TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ninja8ball Archive

View 1 post and 22 comments by ninja8ball on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

After reading this.... I kind of want to go cheer on the US women's soccer team! GO USA!
/r/MensRights05/12/13 04:46 AM
1

Thank you so much for this tip, I will definitely use it.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 06:00 AM
3

You can run 1.5 miles in 9.5 minutes? That's honestly incredible if you're overweight. I'm in the military and I can't get my 1.5 under 10. It's been frustrating me for a very long time.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:44 AM
4

By doing the math, that would mean you could do another half a mile in 4.5 minutes. (9 * 1/2 = 4.5) So 1.5 miles would be about 14.5 minutes. If you add on maybe another 30 seconds because your pace will slow down after the first half, you're saying you can run a 15 minute mile.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:11 AM
7

Okay, still, all I was doing was explaining what weighting is.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:49 AM
12

I'm not making any political or moral or any other kind of point with my post. You said "huh?" as if you didn't understand what it meant to weight the statistics, I explained it.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:55 AM
13

Imagine if there were only 1 woman in the world. If that woman died in an industrial accident, she would account for .0001% or whatever of those accidents, right? But she would make up the entirety (100%) of the female population. Weighting it helps to normalize the statistics in a way that isn't misleading.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:48 AM
1

No there are half decent reasons not to give someone a life sentence outside of excusing their behavior because of trauma they experienced as a child. Perhaps, and this is crazy to consider, but perhaps the punishment doesn't fit the crime, and that's why we don't give life sentences (usually) for proportionally less serious crimes.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 08:33 PM
1

Yes you are. Psychology attempts to explain the why of the behavior (and broadly, the brain) but not excuse bad people for their actions.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:52 AM
1

But all and all I suspect he is quite willing to pay to avoid being tied down with a kid. Child support is far cheaper than babysitters -- even child molesting ones. LOL Blood boiling. Who says something like that?!?!
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:14 AM
6

You don't happen to know many military wives... do you? 'Cause I see a lot of bumper stickers like that around where I'm stationed.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:01 AM
72

The fundamental difference between MRA and this flavor of feminism is MRA won't deny women face inequality still, but the protestors would be quite happy to see only their demands for equality met. Face, meet Palm. facepalm.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:47 AM
14

You just described most of the married people in my squadron. I get the weird looks though when I tell people I'm not interested in dating...
/r/TheRedPill01/04/13 09:50 PM
3

slowclap
/r/MensRights22/01/13 07:49 PM
4

No government wrote the Declaration of Independence. It indeed was a formal body of representatives from different states, but their message was not we're disbanding political ties so we can create a new government which grants us our rights. It was "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights". If it isn't abundantly clear, let me make it so: Your human rights to life, liberty, and property are g…
/r/MensRights24/12/12 05:12 AM
14

Currently active duty and get TA. They've made it clear if I don't pass I owe the military back their tuition. I'm not very informed on the rules for the GI Bill but it wouldn't surprise me to know we'd have to pay back our money if we fail.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:11 PM
1

What were you getting at, anyway? That issue was in no way relevant... I'm not even sure how you connected the dots to bring that up...
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:09 AM
1

It's only relevant if he was jailed in a private prison. The first paragraph said it's a county jail. Presumably belonging to the county since it's a county jail.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 09:55 AM
2

They don't have to downvote. That's not what it was designed for. It has to do more with people holding emotional ties to their karma. They then downvote others as a show of approval or disapproval. If their karma wasn't linked to their emotions, they'd more likely upvote dissenting but relevant discussion.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:07 PM
21

whoooosh I'm not saying anyone "deserves" alimony. I'm saying that if the judge does feel she deserves alimony, but setting it way too high and jailing the man the judge has made it impossible for her to get any alimony at all. Edit: I'm going to make it very clear. I'm not judging the merit of the arguments of alimony. I'm judging the judge's ability to judge effectively.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:43 PM
34

Just assuming she actually deserved alimony, the fact that he's jailed makes him unable to do any helping at all. As wrong as all of this is, this punishment only seems to have made things worse for everyone.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:00 PM
3

That's pretty poor and the most disappointing feature of the reddit community. I do my very best to upvote people with legitimate viewpoints and particularly ones who've been downvoted, even if I disagree. I typically proclaim why so as to encourage different viewpoints instead of stifling people's opinions. Please don't stop dissenting. No matter where you post.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter