TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ninjarxa Archive

View 1 post and 102 comments by ninjarxa on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
53

ninjarxa/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:35 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

because 16 years of being their father means they are now your child. Nope, no it doesn't. It just means you were the victim of paternity fraud for 16 years. At that point you should get a ton of restitution for the time and money you invested in raising someone else's bastard. Time doesn't erase biology.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 09:35 AM
1

The real metric for our value isn't in our contribution to society but in our inherent worth given to us all by God. He isn't impressed by your education. We're called to follow Him, a God who laid down His own (far more valuable) life to save us. Oh man, seriously? Please leave your religion out of this. I never said a child is more valuable than you. Are you an MRA? Aren't you here because you value equality? Isn't it inconsistent to then decide you're more valuable when it comes to saving you…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 09:34 AM
1

Humans aren't really worth a whole lot. There's 7 billion of us, and most of us are easily replaceable in the grand scheme of things, myself included. I don't think there's a universal metric for valuing human life, but to say that an educated adult with a specialized job is not more valuable than an untrained child is simply laughable. Sure, potential is there, but there are no guarantees.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 08:35 AM
2

Yes, compared to me. I'm a functioning, contributing member of society.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:50 AM
1

If the state allowed a mother to unilaterally disc laim the legal rights and obligations incident to motherhood after the child was born , then the law would be extending a right to mothers which it does not afford to fathers. What about giving a child up for adoption or Safe Haven laws? These do the exact same thing this court is claiming that mothers cannot do.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 05:13 AM
7

If you can't face the potential consequences of sex, then don't do it... Simple as that sweet, go tell that to all the women who have the option of abortion and giving up the kid for adoption.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:05 PM
1

r/childfree is a safe place to vent, sometimes people need that.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:06 AM
3

I agree that they should say something like that, but I hear constantly that they're afraid to be up front like that because of the guy's possible reactions. In r/askwomen a lot of them said that they've tried this and have had negative reactions (being called a bitch/slut/cunt/cock tease/etc.) because how dare they not be attracted to said guy? I can understand being hesitant to be so blunt after receiving such a reaction instead of something more reasonable like "oh, okay thanks for being hone…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:57 AM
10

That isn't relevant to the situation.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 07:21 AM
8

Anyone who has a kid is an idiot and I want to slap every child I see. This type of thinking isn't really encouraged on r/childfree. Its mainly people enjoying the things they can do because they don't have kids and then venting about shitty parents who don't know how to properly raise kids/think they're entitled to certain privileges because they're parents/don't respect other people's decision to be childfree.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:01 AM
-10

That's a bullshit excuse for the scared and the lazy.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 10:16 AM
19

Why don't you write a paper on all of the bullshit in the book and try to get the curriculum updated? Include sources and citations that point out all of the inconsistencies, bias, and bad logic. Be proactive so others don't have to suffer through the same stuff.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 08:57 AM
9

omega as fuck
/r/MensRights30/10/12 08:44 AM
13

26 here, marriage is a terrible legal contract for men. The system is not set up in your favor should it go wrong. Its an archaic antiquated tradition that is not necessary in today's world. It doesn't make your relationship work any better. That little scrap of paper won't turn your life around, nor do you need it to show your love for someone. I will never get married.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 07:52 AM
5

but it still saddens me that my happiness can no longer be my priority... Welcome to parenthood. Also have you had a paternity test done? It seems like it would be a prudent measure because who knows how many one night stands she's had. And thanks for solidifying my conviction to get a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:46 AM
5

thanks for that link, that is terrifying and one of the (many) reasons I'll be getting a vasectomy soon. childfree aww yeah
/r/MensRights22/08/12 03:50 AM
7

As vindictive as say... tricking someone into raising a child that wasn't theirs?
/r/MensRights21/08/12 07:53 AM
1

So you're arguing that it is the rights of the woman vs the rights of a fetus? That's all fine and dandy, but really it has nothing to do with men's rights and this discussion belongs in another place.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 05:52 AM
1

What are you arguing here? If it is not a women's rights issue, what the hell is it? Are you arguing that we should press women into putting unwanted fetii into incubation tanks and let them mature until capable of surviving on their own? Who is going to take responsibility for that child? What if they don't want to? This sounds like some extreme right winged science fiction, and it is kinda scary.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:53 AM
3

Seems like calling yourself an egalitarian mra is pretty redundant, since men's rights are covered under the egalitarian label.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:49 AM
8

you're not, some of us have been around a loooong time.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 06:15 AM
4

comment history of the op leads me to believe that it is a male asking the question, perhaps trying to troll or whatever.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:23 AM
4

So why do men (and MRAs) constantly ignore this and trivialize their issues, at least on this subreddit? This subreddit is designed to promote awareness of problems that men face, and understandably is devoid of women's issues because of it. That's not to say that we don't care about them (I consider myself an egalitarian who thinks both sides have issues that need to be attended to) its just that this isn't the place for it. Much like r/feminism isn't the place to find discussion of men's right…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 04:23 AM
16

I really wouldn't bitch out about outright paying for an abortion as it would be infinitely cheaper than having and raising a child. I do think that since it took both parties to get pregnant, both should chip in on the procedure though.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:20 AM
3

I don't doubt that, but food stamps and welfare aren't only given to women. Now if you want to argue that women benefit more from government programs, I'm sure that's true. But let's look at birth control here. I'm sure its cheaper for a male to pitch in a few bucks via taxes to help fund some birth control than it is to knock up some woman and be on the hook for raising an unwanted kid for 18 years. OP just seems extremely mad because he's not the one these women are having sex with.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:13 AM
5

You act as if only men pay taxes.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 09:58 AM
4

This doesn't have anything to do with mens' rights. You sound lonely and bitter.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 09:23 AM
7

I think the main disagreement here between you and me is that I think that we are not ready for that type of policy and you probably see it as necessary and worth it to give men rights now. Why do you oppose giving men the ability to opt out of parenthood when women already have that choice? I would think if you were an egalitarian as you said you were, you'd be in favor of giving men an equal right. It should be noted that there are some fathers who do not pay child support despite the laws. Th…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:41 AM
8

why are men seeking to promote the rights of a group that is already perceived to have rights. This sounds like the heart of the matter to you. Here's the deal, we don't have equal rights in all aspects. A lot of it in the area of reproductive and parental rights, which are absolutely HUGE. Women have the ability to withdraw from motherhood via contraception, abortion, and adoption. Men have condoms and vasectomies, not exactly an equal playing field. If you get pregnant and decide you want to k…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:24 AM
6

Racism and sexism are two completely different things and have no corrolation between them that I am aware of (feel free to cite sources to correct me). You use "priveledged" as a blanket statement. Are men priveledged in some areas of life? Yes. Yes we are. But the same goes for women as well, especially when it comes to parental rights. I don't even identify myself as a MRA, I self-identify as an egalitarian. But back to the question. When you ask that, you're basically asking "do you realize …
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:07 AM
8

What differences do you see between a men's rights movement (a movement for a group that has privilege in our society) and a white right's movement? Are you fucking kidding me?
/r/MensRights27/07/12 06:47 AM
12

Shouldn't we all be egalitarians?
/r/MensRights24/07/12 10:09 AM
5

I would be pissed if my lawyer told me that I'd basically just get over it and be glad I didn't get convicted. You had your reputation dragged through the mud, your time and freedom stolen from you, and are still suffering from the effects of the whole situation. That's bullshit and I hope you hit her with a lawsuit so hard it ruins her forever.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:42 AM
3

Are you planning on filing charges against her for this false accusation?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:06 AM
4

What does this have to do with men's rights? What does having children have to do with perceived success?
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:24 AM
-1

These studies are from the UK, and I am unfamiliar with the education system over there because I'm an American. I'm not sure how well they can be applied over here. Also the testing experiment to try to find out gender bias in grading seems really subjective. I would like to see an example of a question and a similar response from both male and female where the bias is evident, because it seems really unlikely for any bias to be present with a testing method of true/false, multiple choice, or a…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 08:28 AM
-1

thank you
/r/MensRights07/07/12 08:08 AM
-2

Would you please cite sources for me? And while the method of teaching may not be optimal for young boys, what is stopping the parents from helping them pick up the slack?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 07:37 AM
-6

the schools are failing boys No the boys are failing themselves. Stop acting like schools are actively helping girls and ignoring boys just to spite them. It's the parents' responsibility to make sure their child is doing what they need to do for their child to be successful, and I'd be willing to be that a number of them just don't care. Pay attention, study, do homework, participate in class. These aren't gender specific, they're common sense.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 07:08 AM
-2

yes, are you so eager to play the victim card that you grasp desperately at straws like this?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 05:24 AM
-3

No, I get that. Perhaps I should have aimed that reply to the OP because he seems pretty convinced the feminists are out to get young boys in school.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 04:52 AM
-6

I think comparing maleness to a pathology is a gross overstatement. I mean be a good parent and teach your child to sit down, behave, study, and pay attention in class then let's compare grades. This article is stating the case that because male children cannot do these basic things that they fall behind in class, which is true. This issue is purely behavioral and can easily be adjusted by decent parenting. Don't tell me that your child doesn't behave properly in class and then claim there is a …
/r/MensRights07/07/12 04:06 AM
2

That's a valid point, but I have a hard time wrapping my head around a nationwide feminist conspiracy to keep boys from learning.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:33 AM
-3

Can that really be blamed on sexism or maybe its just some sort of combination of poor teaching and shitty parenting?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:05 AM
48

Common law marriage is an atrocious abomination and should be annhilated with all due haste.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 05:35 PM
0

How so? The vast majority of r/atheism is made up of former theists. Don't get me wrong, there are a ton of stupid, arrogant, and asshole people there, but close-minded isn't an adjective I'd use to describe them.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 09:23 AM
7

The bible is one of the most misogynistic pieces of literature on the face of the planet for fuck's sake ,and should in no way be used as a tool to teach communication between the sexes.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 05:33 AM
0

I find it hilarious that you think atheists are close minded. Seriously, an overwhelming majority of us grew up theists, went through church, bible camps, etc and gave it a try. Its not close minded if you actually went through the experience, found it ridiculous, and changed your mind. And I'd invite you to tell me more about how atheists are oppressing your everyday life but this isn't the place and somehow I don't think you could come up with much.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 05:30 AM
54

I'm glad they're mad. Fuck them.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 09:16 AM
4

Morality? What is immoral about it?
/r/MensRights23/06/12 05:23 AM
0

As long as you're not making them both out to be sexual assault that's fine.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 11:43 AM
0

It seems a bit of a stretch to compare unwanted pregnancies and "he didn't tell me he had a penis before he gave me a blowjob".
/r/MensRights08/06/12 11:24 AM
5

It's not illegal, but it is immoral to intentionally mislead someone by deception. I don't think it can be nor should be classified as sexual assualt either.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 06:05 AM
2

I dunno, the whole thing sounds absurd. "Hey everyone, someone said something wrong on the internet, let's get together and bitch about it."
/r/MensRights05/06/12 09:19 AM
1

Is SRS really a board just for whiteknighting?
/r/MensRights05/06/12 09:10 AM
1

but the government can't just declare that you're in a defacto union just because you live together, if that was the case there would be a shit ton of mixed gender roommates unknowingly walking around married.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 12:52 PM
3

You're using a wide brush to paint a generalization of society's definition of emotional maturity. I'm sure there is a lot of variation among socioeconomic statii, ethnic backgrounds, and geographical locations. It seems like you have tunnel vision when it comes to the media, a confirmation bias about men being belittled. I don't think it is the norm at all. Even starting out by mentioning your ex wife leaving you makes you sound pretty bitter and just lashing out at the things you notice. Ameri…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 07:38 AM
1

I don't think you can be civil unioned without your consent. There's no way that could hold up in a court. The government can't tell you that you're married. I believe the circumstances require you to present yourselves as a married couple to the outside world, like telling people that your gf is actually your wife and vice versa.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 04:35 AM
1

I do. Its called oxytocin.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 09:45 AM
1

it gets complicated only if you let it, proper planning works
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:24 PM
1

it comes down to who paid for it, i buy the tv and you watch it doesn't mean you have any claim to it. like you said, don't get a joint checking account, or if you do, only use it for food, not luxury items. pet goes to the person who paid for it, unless it was a gift. not sure how you're making this so complicated
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:53 PM
1

but if you're not married the woman isn't entitled to half of the assets, no alimony. just take what you brought with you. the only things you have to argue over are the things you bought together, which if you're smart you won't. you buy what you want, let the gf buy what she wants, split the bills evenly and if it doesn't work, just take what you bought and go.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 09:47 PM
1

joint checking account yaoface so what if there is other things to separate? can you not sit down and discuss it like civil human beings? whether or not you have to get divorced, these things are going to have to get separated if the relationship fails, so how is this a reflection on anything I said?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:30 PM
1

right on man I always get the you have a nice house why aren't you married, what the fuck does that have to do with anything! i.e. you have money, I want you to marry me so I can have some of it
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:45 AM
0

common law marriage has been addressed already, only 10 states still use it
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:43 AM
1

Its all good buddy.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 09:11 AM
-1

I agree, but demanding via ultimatum someone marry you or you'll leave them is not the way to go about it. Express what you want but be fucking civil about it.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 09:10 AM
1

Oh, unless you simply mean that there is no need for two adults living together with children, to actually be married, to be happy together. In that case you are absolutly correct. yeah, that's pretty much what I was going for.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:37 AM
1

well good luck to you, hope it works out.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:07 AM
-1

care to back that up with evidence?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:05 AM
0

they are if they're catholic...
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:04 AM
1

well that's bullshit. government is far too intrusive in matters it has no business being in.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:43 AM
-1

what's your point? that you need to be married to have children? that a marriage home is the best and most hospitable place to raise children?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:42 AM
-1

can I get a secular source more current than 2006? and one that includes self identifying atheists? thanks
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:41 AM
0

interesting, would he need a court order for each visit/permission slip or is there a cover all court order that you have to get only once?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:57 AM
1

Though the ultimate reason is love, I suppose. I'm sure the majority of marriages are like this, yet how many last? Things change, and people change. If you do get married I wish you the best of luck, but remember its just as possible to love and cherish her the rest of your life without a piece of paper and a little ceremony.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:35 AM
0

I welcome any up to date statistics. I'm glad that you found someone you can trust fully, but the question is, is marriage necessary? Do you need that ceremony and piece of paper to love, trust, and cherish her like you do right now? Also, for many situations, having a pre-nup gives the idea that there is already doubt in the success of the marriage, and getting out is possible. I don't think so, its more of a safeguard to protect what's yours in case shit goes bad. You don't buy car insurance b…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:30 AM
3

I never said it was wrong, I said it was a stupid bet. And should there really be such extreme consequences such as losing half of your stuff because you made a mistake?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:09 AM
3

Do you need a ceremony and a piece of paper to show how much you love someone? Or how committed you are to them?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:07 AM
2

Its not fear, its knowing a bad bet when you see one. Nearly 50% of marriages end in divorce, are you willing to unnecessarily bet your life's accumulation of wealth on a coin flip when you don't have to?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:38 AM
-2

To sit down and ask where the relationship is going is perfectly fine, but saying either we get married or I'm leaving would have been way out of line (which is what I got from your original comment).
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:30 AM
0

Good for you man. I think a lot of guys are afraid to stand up for themselves in this type of situation because they're scared of being dumped over it. Its pretty shitty for her to try that but I'm glad your gf was understanding about it and realized your position. Good luck.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:16 AM
1

So really, I see that if you really trust and love the person if it makes them happy marry them. I wonder how many people have taken that approach only to be raped in the divorce after they've been cheated on...
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:12 AM
6

Explain how it makes it easier, please.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:23 AM
0

yes I can be
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:20 AM
0

that threat is there anytime you are in the same room as your SO... hardly an effective argument against cohabitation.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 03:36 AM
-6

then leave out legitimate, don't paint it in a favorable light
/r/MensRights17/04/12 03:35 AM
12

In my view, the only legitimate reason to get married is because your girlfriend might leave you if you don't sorry friend but that is a terrible reason to get married. that is coercion if your gf threatens to leave unless you marry her. almost as bad as getting married just because you knocked someone up.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:44 AM
0

I addressed that in another post, but only 10 states still carry this archaic rule, and its disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:41 AM
3

The obsession of diamonds is nothing but good marketing that makes men and women feel that an appropriate way to show affection is through the purchase of a stone that is vastly overpriced.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:40 AM
-1

I'm an atheist, and although I loathe religion, I can understand why those who follow it would want to get married in their church in front of their god. But then again this post isn't really addressing the spiritual rammifications of getting married, just the earthly.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:39 AM
3

Don't cohabitate. this just seems excessive. can you elaborate further?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:00 AM
1

That's fine, and that's your right. Drawing up prenupts is a fantastic idea, I'd worry for any man willingly jumping head first into a binding legal contract with no defense. Best of luck to you if you ever do get married.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:55 AM
4

Society places a high value on getting married, mainly because of the religious ties. It's seen as the end result of a normal relationship. "Oh you love each other, when are you getting married (and having kids!)?" That kind of bullshit. As if anyone who doesn't think that marriage and kids is the primary goal of life is weird. Its strange how society dictates norms.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:52 AM
4

sounds like coercion into an unfavorable position to me. better and cheaper to break up before a marriage rather than after imo.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:19 AM
14

Exactly.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:17 AM
1

Thank you for your explanation. I didn't know about the custody and unenforceable provisions, although the example you provided is extreme.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:16 AM
5

That's pretty appalling that the government can set your status as married without your consent. I doubt, at least I hope, that it isn't a very common occurrence. I mean if I act like a fireman in a bunch of aspects, can the government tell me I'm a fireman? Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:59 AM
5

that is a valid point, but I think this discussion caters more towards US citizens.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:57 AM
8

I'm unfamiliar with law, so how much can a prenupt actually protect you? Or is it a legal document that you can be as specific about how the marriage works and the process of divorce, if necessary, goes?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:55 AM
2

also, a number of states consider you legally married after living together for X number of years, so you can't even avoid it sometimes. True, per wikipedia A common-law marriage can still be contracted in the District of Columbia and ten states: Alabama, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Utah, and Texas included. But I think one of the requirements is that you must present yourself to the public as a married couple, therefore if neither partner does such, …
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:51 AM
2

okay, could you flesh this argument out a little bit for me? do those benefits outweigh the costs of divorce and alimony if things don't work out?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter