niroby Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	It doesn’t even guilt women :P Extremists of course exist, but your comment implied this was a common occurrence. Has anyone in your life shamed you when you've supported men's health? I may not see it because I'm a woman, but again I'm yet to meet anyone who has taking umbrage with men's health campaigns.	/r/MensRights	22/08/18 04:15 AM
1	It doesn’t even guilt women :P I'm yet to meet anyone involved in breast cancer awareness, breast cancer research, or even your average feminist, that sees it as a competition. Do you have an example of a person in your life who has said that we shouldn't be working to improve prostate cancer diagnosis rates or mortality and morbidity? In Australia, Movember whilst been a male focused movement has had a huge female following, and women have been encouraged to help support men's health. I'm yet to hear or see a backlash to tha…	/r/MensRights	21/08/18 08:42 PM
0	It doesn’t even guilt women :P You have shown zero understanding of the role of awareness campaigns, the importance of early detection and self checks, or the amount of funds raised that have been then used in research. There are legitimate criticisms of pink campaigns, but you being willfully ignorant of the positives and cancer epidemiology shows that you are not capable of speaking on them. Do better next time.	/r/MensRights	20/08/18 08:13 PM
2	It doesn’t even guilt women :P It may not be a young women's disease, but it still proportionally effects more young women than prostate cancer does young men.	/r/MensRights	20/08/18 10:40 AM
3	It doesn’t even guilt women :P I can understand laziness, especially in an internet argument. Looking solely at average age of onset isn't that useful a metric. Here is the cancer Australia site on breast cancer, and on prostate. Compare figure 1 on both pages, prostate cancer incidence spikes compared to breast cancer which is a slow climb. More young women develop breast cancer than young men do prostate cancer. Prostate cancer has typically been an old man's disease. It used to be common to die with it, rather than from it…	/r/MensRights	20/08/18 09:46 AM
0	It doesn’t even guilt women :P Comparing mean to median is dishonest use of statistics.	/r/MensRights	20/08/18 08:23 AM
-5	It doesn’t even guilt women :P Anecdotes aren't data. Prostate cancer is primarily an old man's disease. That doesn't mean outliers don't exist	/r/MensRights	20/08/18 05:36 AM
3	It doesn’t even guilt women :P Age of onset often matters when discussing the "popularity" of a disease, as does gender and class. A disease that effects more young people, will receive more interest than one that primarily affects senior citizens. Breast cancer awareness has had to do a lot of work to get to the level where it is now. Prior to the 1980s breast cancer was a quiet disease that wasn't typically talked about openly. There were huge campaigns and efforts to get awareness up and have it be an open discussion. From…	/r/MensRights	20/08/18 04:35 AM
-21	It doesn’t even guilt women :P Unfortunately though breast cancer gets a whole lot more attention than prostate cancer Because it effects more young women than prostate cancer affects young men. Prostate cancer is an old man's disease, breast cancer is more equal opportunity in who it affects age wise.	/r/MensRights	20/08/18 04:05 AM
2	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter You're approaching this from a very logical perspective. You've smoothed out all the complex intricacies that surround pregnancy in order to find a fair solution. That's not how it works. Pro-choice women don't necessarily find it an easier choice, and you can't generalise that they do. Pro-life women don't take extra precautions to avoid pregnancy as evidenced by abstinence only states having higher teen pregnancy rates. I'd like you to look at the situation emotionally. also discussed how the …	/r/MensRights	15/02/18 07:52 PM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter For married couples, 'financial abortion' this is not an option I'll accept your premise, but I would like to note that married women do have abortions. In 2014 14% of abortions were for women who were married, and a further 34% were for women who were cohabiting source. And unlike a pro-life woman, it's easier for them to abort a child they could not financially support. I think this might be why we're at cross purposes. You're assuming pro-choice would easily want an abortion. For some that is…	/r/MensRights	15/02/18 03:15 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter Ideally, there would be alternative consequences to these choices A few comments ago I said I'd be more willing to see financial abortion if we had better safety nets. It seems you are the same. The current situation does not allow for financial abortion to be fair to the child, so I don't see why you advocate for it so hard. With financial abortion we have the following results: Father and mother agree to have the child, all happy. Mother doesn't want the child, father does. Mother has an abort…	/r/MensRights	14/02/18 07:56 PM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter From the perspective of 'Opportunity to opt out of parenthood' it is [equal opportunity]." I intentionally specified a single facet of comparison. Saying the same thing over and over again doesn't make it true. They're not equal opportunity, one is discharging your responsibilities to a child, the other is terminating a pregnancy ensuring that no child exists. That's a false comparison I'd say it's quite apt, we're talking about using money to influence someone to have a medical procedure. You d…	/r/MensRights	14/02/18 01:26 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter These aren't considered irrelevant points. They also aren't rights. Which was what you were originally asking about. Even if you disagree that men should have this option, both options allow a parent to make the choice to not be a parent No, again we've been over this. One option results in no child being born. The other results in a live child who now has one less parent. They're not equal opportunity. How is it extortion? It's still entirely the woman's choice If I say donate your kidney to me…	/r/MensRights	13/02/18 10:39 PM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter Outside of parenthood, name 1 right that is gendered? None, because outside of gestation sexual dimorphism is largely irrelevant. At least it shouldn't be. It's responsible for equality of opportunity And a financial abortion isn't equal to having a medical procedure in terms of opportunity either. She's perfectly capable of determining whether she has enough money to support the child, or to abort the child if she does not. Here's one of my big problems with financial abortion, you've now codif…	/r/MensRights	13/02/18 07:03 PM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter It's irrelevant to the conversation. I'm not advocating for biological equality, I'm advocating for legal equality There is no legal equality. Signing off your responsibilities to a potential child is not equal to having a medical procedure. Just like kicking someone in the nuts isn't equal to having a period. Yes, that's exactly my point. Both are making a choice while there is no parent to harm. But it's only one situation that results in their being a child. With a financial abortion there is…	/r/MensRights	13/02/18 02:36 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter From a legal perspective, yes. That is a foundational concept of our legal systems in the West. So your view on the nut kicking, for or against? The decision of the man is also taking place while there is no child His decision is not about having a medical procedure on his body, the two aren't comparable. First, this is not true You missed the word typically. If one parent is dead, if one parent is unknown, then government benefits typically step in. Please read through the articles I send you. …	/r/MensRights	12/02/18 07:38 PM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter Either both sexes get a say post-conception, or neither do. So fairness is the only thing that matters. Excellent it's not fair that women have periods once a month, to make it fair all men of reproductive age will get kicked in the nuts once a month. That is the argument you're making here. It's not fair that women gestate, therefore to make it fair men don't have to pay for their progeny if they don't want to. You're just making it unfair in the other direction. All we're saying is that men sh…	/r/MensRights	12/02/18 04:59 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter By aborting the child, she is preventing herself from becoming a parent. The man can also prevent themselves from becoming a parent by not having penis in vagina sex. It's not fair that women have an additional option to stop a pregnancy, but it's also not fair that men are typically stronger than women. You can't grant someone more rights because biology has created an unfair situation. Women don't get to demand men pick up heavy objects, men don't get to unduly influence women into having a me…	/r/MensRights	12/02/18 03:30 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter In a pregnant couple, the woman has the right to out out of parenthood but the father does not No, she has the right to terminate a pregnancy. There is no child to parent. After birth, the woman has the right to forfeit the child without consulting her partner No. It's unfortunate that a woman can hide a pregnancy from the father, but if the father knows about the child the mother cannot give it up to another person without their input.	/r/MensRights	12/02/18 02:05 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter if a woman doesn't want her child, Safe Haven laws allow her to give him up, no questions asked. The father has no rights in this situation. You know fathers can be the primary custodial parent right, and receive child support from the mother yes?	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 07:40 PM
0	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter The opposite is also true. If he wants to keep the baby (not an embryo, or a foetus) and she doesn't want the child then she can't adopt the baby out. Fathers can be the primary custodial parent, and can receive child support from the mother. Mothers can also sign off their parental rights to the father's partner.	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 09:40 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter It's not nothing but it isn't adequate for financial abortion. Universal basic income, plus each child receiving a stipend might be. The current system means that single parents who are low income earners are typically better off being a stay at home parent, because any money they earn is equal or less than what they'd pay in child care (even with the rebate), and earning over a set amount can reduce their benefits so they end up bringing home less than if they hadn't gotten a job. Our safety ne…	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 09:29 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter Have you ever been a single parent on the pension? Our safety net is great but not good enough for financial abortion	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 08:40 AM
1	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter It's a more passive choice, but it's still a choice. However, society has made the decision that a child requires the support of two parents (where possible), so by choosing to walk away, they then have to choose to deal with the resulting consequences of wage garnishment etc. I'd say ghosting the mother, and refusing all contact with her would be an example of ignoring the consequences. In a different society, with a better support network for all children, I'd see it as a workable option.	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 07:57 AM
0	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter By having an abortion, you're removing those consequences We disagree. Abortion isn't undoing the pregnancy. It's making an active choice. You're dealing with the consequences by having a medical procedure. If you have a tooth ache, is getting the cavity filled ignoring the consequences?	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 07:25 AM
0	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter While abortion is an option, men should have the choice to opt out of parenthood, just as a women can They do. It's called adoption. Find someone to take over your parental rights.	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 06:39 AM
0	More knowledge bombs over at r/blackpeopletwitter Abortion is accepting the consequences. Ignoring the pregnancy, delivering the child and then abandoning it, would be not accepting the consequences.	/r/MensRights	11/02/18 06:31 AM
0	Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds Nice dodging the question. If a study is robust it will stand on it's own, outside of meta-analysises and literature reviews, it is always better to share the original research.	/r/MensRights	29/12/17 08:07 PM
0	Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds The blog is an editoralisation of the study. Let's say I write a blog post that talks about a study which found that 90% of men will use violence when an argument doesn't go that way. This blog post gets shared on a feminist subreddit. It turns out the actual study is about how when trapped in a situation where they feel like there is no exit, men will use violence in order to escape. Am I being dishonest about the study? Should the people discussing the study have linked the actual research rat…	/r/MensRights	29/12/17 08:02 PM
-1	Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds A blog post is an opinion piece, and typically tends to be the worst kind of science journalism. Which as a general rule isn't great. If you want people to take research seriously link the article without editoralising. If it's good research it will stand on its own. Why would you be against that?	/r/MensRights	29/12/17 05:09 AM
2	Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds So you do know what a primary source. Why on earth would you share a blog post then.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 10:05 PM
3	Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds Lol. Using a blog post and treating it like it's a reputable source, isn't really a question of opinion. You are bad at research and you should feel bad. Remember how I said you were ruining the men's rights movement, this right here is an example of that. You are killing what could be a good movement by death of a thousand cuts. When the only talked about articles are biased blog posts and tabloids, it makes the movement a joke.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 09:57 PM
3	Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds When I find people being purposefully ignorant about basic science/research I correct them.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 09:44 PM
-5	Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds ... a blog post isn't an article.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 09:32 PM
1	Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds That's a cop out excuse. If you want to share legitimate research then you do that, you don't share blog posts that talk about it in the same breath as quoting reactionary media personalities. Doing so ruins the credibility of the work.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 09:29 PM
5	Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds Bud, you could have linked to the abstract, instead you linked to a reactionary blog post. The importance of using the primary source is generally covered in high school.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 08:59 PM
5	Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds I don't think you understand how research science works. Hint, the first step is to share the original paper not force people to jump through hoops. Frankly, you make the men's rights group look bad because you make it look academically dishonest. You want to be taken seriously? Then act like it.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 08:18 PM
5	Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds I don't think you understand how research papers work. Plenty of journals are now open access, and generally there is a way to get the paper if not. With sites like research gate it is even easier. Heck, they could have linked to the abstract and even that would have been better than linking to a shitty blog post.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 08:16 PM
3	Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds Then why didn't you post the original research paper? This isn't even a review paper, it's a heavily biased blog. You should know better.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 07:49 PM
0	Flip the Script: No consequences for her Bud, so far you've wanted to sentence people based on future offences. You've also used your thesaurus a lot to try to build your case, but it's only served to make you sound like a first year philosophy student. You've also fallen into the fallacy fallacy, just because something is a fallacy doesn't mean it's not a worthy argument.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 09:46 AM
0	Flip the Script: No consequences for her Yeah, you don't understand the legal system.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 09:38 AM
0	Flip the Script: No consequences for her The timing of the text is relevant how? Because we don't sentence people based on future actions. The texts came after sentencing. Yes yes yes, because one has to be a chartered lawyer or court judge to have an educated opinion Lol you don't have an educated opinion, you have an overinflated sense of your own importance.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 09:33 AM
0	Flip the Script: No consequences for her There's no reason to believe that the callousness of this women deserves any modicum of "leniency", especially when there is clear intent, provocation of the child's father via text You realise the texts came after sentencing right? And she was given a lenient sentence because at the time of sentencing she showed remorse and was working towards betterment. She also cannot re-offend as she lost custody of both her children. Tell me do you actually have any experience with the legal system?	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 09:19 AM
0	Flip the Script: No consequences for her What? Harsher sentences don't reduce crimes, and without rehabilitation when criminals finish their sentence they tend to re-offend. More leniency for first time offenders and rehabilitation leads to better outcomes for the whole society.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 09:04 AM
0	Flip the Script: No consequences for her You can want that sure, but it leads to worse outcomes for everybody. The justice system should be a combination of punishment and rehabilitation, not just punishment.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 08:56 AM
0	Flip the Script: No consequences for her Literally all I said is that men and women should be held equally accountable for their actions. I asked you a question, which would you rather see: women punished equal to men, or men given leniency to become equal to women. You answered the former, clearly you'd rather see men punished. You're hiding behind a wall of text, but it all boils down to you being anti-women rather than pro-men. I'd love to see a men's rights movement which actually raises up men, but you've repeatedly stated that th…	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 02:50 AM
0	Flip the Script: No consequences for her The point of my comment was to inform you and anyone else who might read it, of just how bad the sentencing disparity Why do you think I'm not aware of this information. As far as what I want... What I want is for women to be held accountable for their actions to the same standard as men. So you'd rather punish men, then see men be given lenient sentences and be encouraged towards rehabilitation. You are what's wrong with the men's rights movement. Instead of fixing a known problem, you'd rather…	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 02:19 AM
-1	Flip the Script: No consequences for her What is your point with this wall of text? The current situation is that (white) women typically receive lighter sentencing. Given the following two options which would you rather see: Women treated more harshly so that it's fair to men? Men treated with more leniency so that it's fair to men? Because so far all of your ranting suggests that you'd rather punish women than actually help men.	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 01:33 AM
0	Flip the Script: No consequences for her I answered your question, you did not like the answer. It just is not the answer you want. You answered you'd like to see justice out of the justice system, which is an incredible non-answer. So far, you did not answer my question. I asked a simple, yes or no question. Your question was a sarcastic attack on my character. I don't answer questions that aren't asked in good faith. Me, I prefer a prison to do the housing while a person decides to behave outside the bounds of society. Rehabilitation…	/r/MensRights	28/12/17 01:09 AM
1	Flip the Script: No consequences for her Have you? Attacking your opponent, answering the questions you want to answer rather than the ones you were asked. Wanting an intangible idea rather than actual result (what exactly is justice?). Prefering punishments rather than rehabilitation, so contributing to actually worsening the problem rather than working towards solutions. You should run for government, you'd fit right in.	/r/MensRights	27/12/17 11:17 PM
0	Flip the Script: No consequences for her Your very good at ignoring questions and responding to what you want the argument to be. So, obviously, the justice system goal is to return the child to the abuser at the most prodigious rate possible after white washing the crime. She lost custody of both her children, and was given 12 hours of supervised visitation. After those 12 hours it goes back to a judge who will take into account her text messages. I'm not seeing how the justice system is awarding her sole custody at the most prodigiou…	/r/MensRights	27/12/17 11:02 PM
1	Flip the Script: No consequences for her To be blunt, that healing process ,you were implying has occurred, takes YEARS to happen if ever. I didn't state that it occurred, I said she was working towards that goal. And tell me again, how a guy has the same rehabilitation prospects? You seem to be reading statements that I'm not making. You asked if a man should receive the same leniency, and I said if their situation was similar they should. You didn't ask about the current state of the justice system, or if I think there are inequal se…	/r/MensRights	27/12/17 09:20 PM
-2	Flip the Script: No consequences for her That's not answering the question. If a man had experienced childhood sexual abuse, been raped multiple times, had mental health problems, and was now showing remorse for their actions, had completed rehab, was getting psychological help, and had committed to further education, I'd like to see them get a similar level of leniency. Would you prefer to see them thrown in a cell with no rehabilitation prospects?	/r/MensRights	27/12/17 08:32 PM
-6	Flip the Script: No consequences for her Regardless of how much you disagree with the punishments, they were still applied. So pretending like she received no consequences is patently false. Complain that the consequences should have been harsher, but don't lie. You didn't answer my question. What do you think the end goal of the justice system is?	/r/MensRights	27/12/17 08:18 PM
0	Flip the Script: No consequences for her To me, this shows that the Australian court system has to be under influence of a very malicious and toxic force of some kind What do you think the end goal of the court system should be?	/r/MensRights	27/12/17 07:42 PM
-10	Flip the Script: No consequences for her Welcome to a life without any consequences You do realise she suffered consequences right? She was given a suspended sentence (which means if she fails her alcohol and drug testing or gets arrested for anything else she goes directly to jail). She lost all custody of both her children and was only given 12 hours of supervised visitation, after those 12 hours are up it goes back to a judge. Who will consider her text messages as part of the case for her visitation rights. She also only got this l…	/r/MensRights	27/12/17 07:41 PM
2	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. It's possible that we just see different articles. I follow R U OK and Movember on Facebook, so stories on men's health and male suicide are constantly on my news feed. I'm also from a farming area and there's been a huge push in recent years to combat the high suicide rates in farmers. I feel like the ABC runs stories on male suicide quite regularly too. Here's one from last week.	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 07:19 AM
1	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. Youth sucide, or Trans suicide, or LGBT suicide, or "Sexual Minortiy Youth" suicide, or "Adolescents with Bipolar Disorder" suicide, or "Homeless Youth" suicide, or "College student" suicide, or "Chinese older adult" suicide, or "Alaskan Native Youth" suicide, etc. etc. Do you think that these groups don't include males? Perhaps it's different in the US, but in Australia male suicide is constantly in the news. Especially male suicide in rural communities. I did a quick google news search for mal…	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 05:58 AM
3	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. Meanwhile, men are having a suicide epidemic. Why? Who knows These are all the research projects the US government funded on suicide prevention in 2016 Here all the ones for suicide. Why do you feel like this isn't being investigated? Because it is.	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 04:19 AM
3	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. So not much. Why don't you use this passion and fundraise? You've talked about suicide risk a couple of times, why not start an R U OK movement in your community?	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 03:45 AM
4	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. So what have you done about this thing you're so passionate about?	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 03:40 AM
4	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. From our discussion it seems I've done more for men's health than you have. I've repeatedly fundraised for men's health charities. You seem to just rant on the internet about how unfair it all is.	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 03:33 AM
3	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. That might be the point of the post but only because you've moved the goal posts a dozen times to get here. Your original point was that there where no men's health programs. When shown that there are programs specifically focused on men's health and funded by the US government you switched to wanting a men's health agency. Frankly I think you don't want to change the status quo, you just want to whine about how unfair it is on the internet. Again, why don't you focus your anger and passion into…	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 03:29 AM
3	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. Who says I'm against a Men's health agency?	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 03:14 AM
3	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. Dude I gave you a link to that exact data. Per 1000 people in 2011 men had a standard death rate of 6.7 compared to women's 4.7. The reason why there isn't a US department for men's health is because traditionally men's health has just been considered health. What are the classic symptoms for a heart attack or a stroke? Turns out that the 'classic' symptoms are only classic for men. Women can report with very different symptoms and we've only worked this out recently because in medicine we consi…	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 02:58 AM
1	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. Not by the same margins. And why does that matter? Things got better for men but that doesn't count because things also got better for women?	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 02:48 AM
1	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. I'm not trying to save anyone, I am trying to understand why you seem to think why a hazardous environment is okay for you. Do you think it's okay for young men to make the same career choices you have made?	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 02:46 AM
1	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. It literally decreased by 20%. Who says I'm against research into men's health or education programs for men? I've literally espoused the virtues of charities which are focused on that. [Here is a list of all the prostate cancer research the US funded in 2016] (https://report.nih.gov/categorical_spending_project_listing.aspx?FY=2016&ARRA=N&DCat=Prostate%20Cancer) Here is the list for suicide prevention, an area which typically affects more men then women Here is homelessness	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 02:31 AM
1	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. Why aren't you using some of your above minimum wage to move into a different career? There are plenty of trades that don't involve hazardous chemical removal. You could study part time by distance if you don't want a trade.	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 02:19 AM
1	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. Yes you did link to more up to date data. But as it turns out your data is still out of date. That 50% stat is no longer accurate.	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 02:14 AM
1	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. Dude you linked me to a fifty year old abstract. The ABS uses context to explain their 50% rate, something you failed to do. Did you also note that all cause mortality for males is decreasing? From 2008 to 2011 the death rate per 1000 people dropped from 7.3 to 6.7 and the trend is that it will continue to drop. Your fifty percent stat is no longer accurate. Men's health has become a large focus in Australia, partly due to the work by groups like Movember. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]…	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 02:02 AM
5	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. ...That paper is from 1976. And that is an abstract.	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 01:34 AM
7	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. You keep on using mortality rate but I don't think you understand how that works. Men in Australia are not dying 50% faster than women. You have to use these stats in context or they're meaningless. I don't think you should shut up, I do think your anger is misplaced. Do you know why breast cancer prognosis has improved in the last thirty years? Because people got angry about women dying and decided to invest in research and education. Just like Movember is doing with men's health. Be angry, but…	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 01:23 AM
3	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. Complaining about it certainly isn't doing anything for them. Here I'll help, Movember was started by a group of guys in Melbourne, Australia. They wanted to raise money for a cause that was important for them, men's health. It is now a global mega charity. Use all this energy you have for this cause and start up your own branch of the charity. Men's health is importan to you, so do something about it.	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 01:12 AM
0	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. maybe start working on those issues? Why aren't you working on these issues?	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 01:02 AM
4	In the U.S., there are twice as many women over the age of 85 than men, but no 'men's health' programs. Why do you choose to work there? I work with hazardous chemicals, I'm well aware of the risks and take steps to reduce the potential for harm. With proper PPE hazardous chemicals won't impact on your life expectancy.	/r/MensRights	23/08/17 12:59 AM
2	Woman wants an abortion because she found out she was pregnant on the day Donald Trump was sworn in as President. And the father's political choice is? Which country do you live in that step parents aren't able to adopt their step children?	/r/MensRights	22/01/17 02:39 AM
2	Woman wants an abortion because she found out she was pregnant on the day Donald Trump was sworn in as President. And the father's political choice is? You said there was a double standard with regards to being responsible for a pregnancy. I assumed you were talking about abortion as a double standard? My point was abortion is a responsible decision, so there's nothing to have a double standard for. With "financial" abortion the response is for a child outside of utero. Once a child is outside both parents have the same rights (or theoretically do), so again there is no double standard. Besides we already have something in place that confers th…	/r/MensRights	21/01/17 09:02 PM
5	Woman wants an abortion because she found out she was pregnant on the day Donald Trump was sworn in as President. And the father's political choice is? An abortion is a responsible decision. If you have a uterus you get to decide what is in that uterus. You don't get to decide what is in other people's uteruses.	/r/MensRights	21/01/17 08:18 PM
1	How To Boost Your Testosterone Naturally LH and FSH don't travel through the spine. They're released into the blood stream. The pituitary is technically outside the brain. The rest of this is mainly fluff. Eat well, exercise, drink in moderation, and if you're that worried about your hormone levels see an endocrinologist. Don't self diagnose or self treat, unless you want your testes to stop working.	/r/TheRedPill	09/12/16 09:25 PM
3	Feminist Karen DeCrow on Male Reproductive Rights Regardless, if you decide not to financially support your offspring you don't get to be involved in their lives, which is not the situation /u/redditisfulloffags is in.	/r/MensRights	26/08/15 07:05 AM
3	Feminist Karen DeCrow on Male Reproductive Rights This kind of policy wouldn't affect your situation at all. You seem to want to be involved in your children's lives. A 'financial abortion' would be for fathers who don't want anything to do with their offspring.	/r/MensRights	26/08/15 04:46 AM