TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nixonrichard Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by nixonrichard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

You get called islamophobic for saying forced modesty on women is sexist, too. Many people can't handle any criticism of barbaric religions. That being said, there are worse things than people calling you names . . . like . . . getting bits of your dick cut off.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 05:31 AM
2

Yeah, it tends to vary on jurisdiction, generally consistent with voyeurism laws. In most areas, sneaking a view of a woman's chest is illegal, but not a man's . . . on the flip side, women are obligated to keep their chests covered.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 12:54 AM
7

I think people are shooting over one another's shoulder here. One side is arguing the perspective of the untenable rules feminists have constructed, and the other is arguing that perspective is untenable. Both are making the same argument just with different levels of abstraction.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 09:21 PM
1

Can confirm. All Title IX complaints get federal follow-up. Start by sending a formal, written complaint to the school's title IX office, then look into New Mexico's FOIA laws. FOIA everything . . . now. Don't wait. Most school e-mail systems delete all e-mails within 6 months.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 05:02 AM
28

1) murder doesn't have to be planned in advance 2) slamming someone's head into concrete is pretty good evidence you were intending to kill them.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 11:24 PM
1

Maybe not crying, but the more serious matters of openly expressing feelings, such as expressing thoughts and feelings of suicide, are WAY more frightening than someone saying "lemme holla at ya, baby."
/r/MensRights01/03/19 08:33 AM
6

Right, but it also makes people uncomfortable when others cry around them. So the question is whether or not we want people to be open with their feelings, or guarded with their feelings because they're afraid expressing them will make others uneasy or uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 08:41 PM
11

Well, it was intended to be lighthearted, but yes. "Cat calling" as displayed in the video were predominantly just simple expressions of sexual feelings. The broader idea that we should be silent and ashamed when we have a feeling of sexual attraction towards someone (even in situations where those feelings run no risk of jeopardizing a professional or personal relationship) is antithetical to the notion that we should openly express how we feel.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 07:59 PM
38

"Men need to be more comfortable expressing their feelings" "I walked through Manhattan for 10 hours, look at all these times these assholes had the audacity to express their feelings without my consent."
/r/MensRights28/02/19 05:14 PM
1

This is the plot of Terminator.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 06:52 PM
58

Women have always been the primary victims of suicide. They lose a paycheck, a scapegoat, and someone to pay their lawyer's fees.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 07:09 AM
36

Gungans no like outsiders, so don't expect a warm welcome.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/19 06:23 PM
1

McEnroe was openly called an asshole by the media, even his fans (and he) admitted he was an asshole. That was his thing . . . and he was severely penalized for it. If Serena Williams wants to be the bad girl of tennis, that's fine, but you cannot simultaneously be an asshole and also expect not to face the consequences of it.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 05:52 PM
0

Asking someone to send you a pic of their dick is also jail time if it's a minor you're soliciting. Sexual harassment is a workplace thing and . . . asking for pictures of someone's dick is also sexual harassment if you're in that context. your dick pic ending up who knows where, etc. That's not a risk, that's a bonus ;)
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:36 AM
0

One doesnt risk anything other than somebody saying no if they ask for a pic basically. The other risks that and way more. Does it? What, exactly, is the risk in sending a dick pic?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 12:08 AM
1

Yeah, but the boldness required to actually ask someone for a picture of their penis exceeds the boldness required to just send one. I don't know why people make such a big deal about dick pics (one way or another). It's just a silly little mating ritual.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 09:11 PM
1

Who would explicitly request a dick pic?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:51 PM
7

Yeah, tail feather displays in many species of bird work exactly the same as dick picks.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 11:43 PM
1

They also recommend condom use. The fact that condoms could be used doesn't mean they are, or that that lack of use is not an actual risk.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:26 PM
0

From the study, they refer to reductions in transmission of disease that cause death.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 06:34 AM
-1

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/e756 That's the technical report. Heads up, there are nearly 250 cited studies there.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:21 AM
-7

But the AAP is claiming that the benefits actually outweigh the risks from a medical perspective, and also some children do have their breast tissue removed prior to puberty when the benefits are perceived to outweigh the risks.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:18 AM
2

When looking for guidance on something it's usually better to not look to organizations made up specifically of people who profit from that thing. I mean okay, but we all happily brought up the AAP's guidance when their policy was opposition to circumcision. Also, the AAP's pros/cons of circumcision from a medical perspective are not matters of trust, they're matters of cited medical studies.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:17 AM
-2

I hear you, but we were all completely happy to point out the AAP's position back when they opposed circumcision and said the medical benefit didn't outweigh the risks. You don't need to trust them, though. They cite their sources.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:09 AM

At the same time, the AAP does see medical benefits that outweigh the risks: https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/pages/newborn-male-circumcision.aspx I'm not trying to wade into this old debate again, but there are medical arguments (that are supported by research) on both sides of this issue. I think it's probably better to argue this from the perspective of individual autonomy. As in: we shouldn't permanently remove body parts without someone's consent except in cases of not…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:52 AM
1

Also, disable your voicemail and don't take their calls. People desperately try to respond to e-mail with phone calls and if they get a voicemail they'll just say "Hey, this is so-and-so hoping to discuss the issue you brought up. Please call me back at XXX-XXXX" and then if you don't call them on the phone they'll ignore your complaint. NEVER let people talk in person or on the phone. Always by letter or e-mail.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 08:36 PM
1

She's literally saying "you should have realized I wasn't into you while I was sucking on your penis." Like, I know people can send mixed signals, but that's a doozie right there.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:51 AM
4

We've already seen what people do when they are both arrogant and also willing to lay themselves prostrate before the judgment of social justice: they announce their resignation and reap the praise for the selfless act of atonement but then remain too self-absorbed to ever actually resign. I can see it now: "I will be resigning in the coming weeks, and my replacement will certainly be a transgender woman of color . . . I am so sorry." . . . 92 weeks later and he's still on the air.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 05:08 PM
31

"Oh fuck, this wrap only had 19 grams of protein. Fuck. They don't sell Bison meat here, either. BRB, bison meat."
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/17 03:46 AM
1

Democracy dies in darkness. Stop silencing the press's right to put real people and real organizations into rape fantasy erotic fiction they claim to be actual events.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 04:02 PM
15

Netflix teases you with unlimited access to everything, but then once you sign up for continuing monthly billing, Netflix slowly cuts back your access over time until eventually the only thing you can get is a joyless handjob once a month. Wait, what?
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:03 PM
55

There are many, many episodes of old series programs that broadcasters refuse to rebroadcast, or they censor segments. The "he's knocking on the backdoor, should I let him in" anal sex joke in Family Guy is normally cut from reruns. The King of the Hill where Bobby is forced to smoke a carton of cigarettes is also no longer aired. Happens all the time, although, the part of the Bill Nye episode that was cut was just a silly thing to cut.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 02:59 PM
6

That's why I deliberately hedged it with "nearly." Average net worth with a college degree in the US is $500,000. Average net worth without a college degree in the US is $80,000.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 03:23 PM
23

Two things happened under Obama that compounded the problem: the federal government essentially took over the entire student loan industry, and the "dear colleague" letter demanding a preponderance of the evidence standard. Yeah, the feds always pushed inappropriately using Title IX, but positioning all colleges to be dependent on federal support and demanding standards of evidence in exchange for that support is VERY troubling. College has become nearly essential for success in the modern world…
/r/MensRights29/04/17 08:08 AM

"In honor of men having a 400% higher rate of being killed on the job, our police department will only be responding to 1 in 5 calls for assistance by women today."
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:04 AM
8

Objects, fingers, and tongue generally count.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 09:03 PM
11

Yeah, remember that time when a woman had to pay $900/mo for 18 years because a man decided to keep an erection.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 08:56 PM
5

The drugs don't prevent aging, and are not intended to prevent aging.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 08:54 PM
7

The law treats prescriptions of the same drug for birth control and non-birth control very differently. If you're being given a drug for hormonal effects without the intent to prevent pregnancy, it's not considered "birth control."
/r/MensRights20/02/17 08:54 PM
6

That might be true except that recently with the bathroom fiasco federal policy became "your sex is when you present as your sex, not based on any legal document." Now it's all in "who the hell knows" territory.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 02:04 AM
15

The absurdity of it really comes to light when you consider sex change operations as well. Under federal law in the US, insurers are required to pay for domestic violence screening and counseling for women only, and are only required to cover birth control for women only. So if a woman is undergoing counseling for domestic violence, and she transitions to male, he will suddenly start having to pay for his domestic violence counseling out of pocket. The absolute absurdity comes when you consider …
/r/MensRights02/02/17 09:48 PM
8

Not sure I can give a good source. ACA coverage requirements classify both birth control and domestic violence screening and counseling as "women's services" which must be covered 100%. There is no corresponding category of coverage for men. http://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/facts-and-features/fact-sheets/preventive-services-covered-under-aca/#CoveredPreventiveServicesforWomenIncludingPregnantWomen
/r/MensRights30/08/16 08:24 PM
29

A big part of this is there are special interests right now jealously guarding their golden goose statistics. Why do you think domestic violence screening for women is covered 100% under Obamacare and covered 0% for men?
/r/MensRights30/08/16 04:07 PM
39

Yeah, but they had to toss him in there to prove the point that evil people have tiny or crooked penises.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 09:59 PM
88

Jezebel is my favorite: http://archive.is/AJR0c
/r/MensRights20/08/16 08:38 PM
7

Eh, this guy doesn't have a story that makes him innocent. He admitted to committing the robbery and destroying evidence of the murder committed during his robbery.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 03:09 PM
7

I think Cenk an be okay, but he needs to stay the fuck away from cases like Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin. The dude completely loses control of any sense of objectivity or rationality.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/16 05:19 PM
0

. . . until your husband comes home early from work and walks into your bedroom.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 03:26 AM
18

There also seems to be an avoidance of discussing the nature of false rape accusations. Yes, false accusations happens all the time, but that doesn't mean all false accusations are equal. Rape is one of the few crimes where the false accusation alone, with no other evidence of any form, is enough to ruin someone's life. It seems the reason there is such a vociferous defense of women in these rape cases is that rape prosecutions ordinarily DEPEND on being able to convict people without evidence o…
/r/MensRights03/06/12 05:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter