TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nnniiiccckkk1 Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by nnniiiccckkk1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Meh, not everyone takes the hippocratic oath (I did not). Its kinda outdated, I mean there is a part about no touching young boys...
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:56 PM
1

I mean this is an interesting post with some good info, I just really do not see the need for the aggressive tone that permeates the whole post. I mean this is a basic theoretic discussion of physiology and biochemistry and how it applies to nutrition, not a pump up session before a football game. If anyone wants to learn a bit more, there is a fantastic presentation by Dr.Ludisg that goes a lot deeper. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 07:48 PM
11

The actual deposition in his lawsuit against Colombia does a pretty good job.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:26 PM
1

9 years younger actually.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 04:43 PM
1

Interesting example. Might there be a distinction based on what you are alleging, ie the criminal nature of the act? So one would need a court decision for that, but you could go around saying that they guy has an illigimate child, because there is no crime? Or could it be the dissemination? So if I said it to a buddy at a bar it would be ok, but if I said on TV wrote it in a newspaper it would not? But good point.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 10:21 PM
1

You got me interested and did some reading. For one, Canada follows the more plaintiff friendly British model (without Quebec). This makes sense as the US tends to value freedom of expression very highly and more so than other countries. Secondly, our (my?) laws are kinda different. As the wiki page so eloquently puts it :"The parameters of English-Canadian defamation law have been described as arbitrary, capricious, absurd and otherwise illogical." The distinction, as I understand it, is that i…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 09:05 PM
2

Completely agreeing and expanding with a longer explanation!
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:55 PM
1

Yes. But I can undestand that he doesn't want to do that. It would reopen the case and have further looks into the veracity of her claims. For defamation to be hold, he has to prove that what she said was false. As we know, this would lead to more media attention,probably not of the best kind for him. To sue the university, he doesn't have to show that her claims are false. He only has to show that the universities reaction was a) discriminatory based on his gender and b) created a hostile learn…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:47 PM
1

In fairness she did not try and get him locked up, just expelled.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:43 PM
1

There are two distinctions to be made. One Falwell is a public figure, so the standards for defamation are higher. For a private figure (which he obviously was), you need to prove falshood, that it caused harm (no intent) and that no reasonable attempt to find the truth was made (research). In this case, if it was false, it obviously caused harm (again whether she intended it to is irrelevant). The third criteria doesn't really apply. For a public figure, you have to prove the above three plus i…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:42 PM
1

That was my first reaction too.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:35 PM
1

Why do you say that? if you can prove that something is true, then it 100% does not count as defamation.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:33 PM
2

The whole point of university is not to learn things. The whole point is to demonstrate to others (employers, medical schools) that you are smart and disciplined. You can't do that with a degree in basket weaving...
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 06:41 AM
5

TRP is about doing helping achieve one's goals by promoting a certain outlook on life. What counts as successful varies from person to person. He definitely, by his definition, achieved that success and is therefore "alpha". He is completely right to point out the certain obsessive focus on one area of success, namely sexual success. Not everyone is as focused on that one area and that is their choice. Finally, if you define "alpha" as being the dominant male in a group, then I hope that I will …
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 06:30 AM
0

Creatinine is produced by muscle. More muscle = more creatinine...
/r/TheRedPill26/03/15 10:01 PM
27

"said she felt pressured in to reporting the false claims because her former boyfriend was ‘violent’ and ‘controlling’." At least own up to it instead of accusing another guy...
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:27 PM
7

Here is the source he gave: https://www.thecalmzone.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Mortality-stats-deaths-registered-in-Eng-Wales-2013-with-CALM-calculations.pdf Here are the canadian numbers http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/84-215-x/2012001/table-tableau/tbl004-eng.htm As you can see, it kinda depends how you count. If you group accidental death with homicide, this "violent death" would be number one. If you separate them, suicide comes ahead.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:32 PM
1

Kinda the same as selling vs buying drugs. Selling is a criminal act, buying is legal/civil act.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 09:50 AM
2

Sue on what grounds? A doctor giving medical advise?
/r/MensRights11/01/15 10:08 PM
2

While this is interesting and I love game theory, I don't think that you picked the right game (PD) or the right framework. My idea would be to do it on a population level, not individual. That way you do not simply account for one on one interactions, but you can account for switch in society. The model that you could use is evolutionary game theory. This has the advantage of not being restricted to "pure" strategies, that is to say Altruistic vs Selfish, but you can create a "mixed" strategy. …
/r/TheRedPill12/12/14 04:25 PM
1

"alcohol is metabolized to lactic acid" Not quite, ethanol is oxidized to acetaldehyde then to acetate (all 2 Cs). Acetate is then either further oxidized to CO2 or transformed to Acetyl-CoA, which can either be used as the building blocks for free fatty acids or oxidized to ATP via the citric acid cycle. Since the liver is in a surplus of energy, most of the Acetyl-CoA will indeed make FFA. AT no point is a carbon added to make lactate/lactic acid. "and then built into triglycerides and then in…
/r/TheRedPill23/11/14 11:51 PM
1

Obviously not OP, but in the field so I can answer for him. Essentially, as a doc, you choose the amount of patients that you take on and this leads to a certain amount of work. So if you want to only work 3 days a week, you will make 60% of what the guy that works five makes.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/14 06:50 PM
1

Animals are diploid, that is to say that they have two copies of everything. One copy gets fucked up? No problem make another one. The exception is of course the Y chromosome, men only have one (paired with an X) and women have none. The point of that paragraph is that, when you only have one of something, you can`t really experiment around with it as much. Any mistake will have much more serious consequences.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 11:20 PM
10

I have seen him twice, and both times his set fell apart, the music stopped and he had to restart. I had never seen anything like it before....
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 01:19 AM
-2

"Do you think your fragile body can handle 2 cups of water every hour, cupcake?" Probably. It is just that I don't really see the point, best case it just gets pissed out, worst case bad things can happen. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/strange-but-true-drinking-too-much-water-can-kill/
/r/becomeaman28/08/14 12:14 AM
-5

Um what? 8 L is excessive and borderline dangerous.
/r/becomeaman27/08/14 09:52 PM
9

Brazil for black guys kinda sounds like Japan for white guys...
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 07:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter