TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nocorelyt Archive

View 2 posts and 20 comments by nocorelyt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

99% of the time, Slate is a fucking rag and not worth reading.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 11:01 PM
-2

Men who let women get away with the "my vagina forced me to, I had no control" excuse are not deserving of success in intimacy/sex/love/whathaveyou.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 03:46 PM
0

If you can't remember what happened to you and you wake up with your pants around your ankles and the last woman you saw is bragging that you two boned that night, then it's non-consensual sex, which is considered rape. To be honest, that's all the evidence anyone needs.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 04:53 PM
1

Considering this is the fourth time since the top of the thread that I've seen this question, can OP please put the answer to this question in the original post?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 10:10 PM
8

Unfortunately, the man's response was the best one yet. I had to close the tab after reading the woman's comment, because it was so blatantly ignorant I wanted to scream.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 11:53 PM
4

God, just reading those quotes makes my blood boil.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 01:18 PM
4

Trust me, I have noticed, and I don't appreciate the condescension. I do believe that, regardless of how many people we have on this planet, the "we must protect women as a resource" mentality has always remained despite factors that would make it irrelevant. As I said before, I'm simply providing a possible theory as to why the law still considers men more expendable than women. I'm not saying the law is right.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:54 PM
1

Oh, it very well could be that! I'm not saying my hypothesis is definitive in the slightest - I love to hear other hypotheses on this! And you're right, the study of biology and of genes have not been around longer than law - but regardless of when they started studying it, biology and genetics have always been in play long before we started looking at them scientifically - the only difference is, back then, they either took it for granted or incorporated religion to understand it.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:53 PM
2

I'm not sure if I would consider who carries the womb "irrelevant," particularly because men cannot, biologically, carry offspring from conception to birth - we get to carry them afterwards, often in those ridiculous-looking baby carriers that we strap to our chests, but I digress. In terms of the prevalence of monogamy as a societal norm, I think the idea of women being less expendable would still apply - if a woman's husband dies on the battlefield, she can still take another man and have chil…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 06:50 PM
6

You won't hear any disagreement from me on that point - especially considering that our methods of warfare are moving farther away from boots on the ground and more to microchips and missiles. I just wanted to make the point that, in terms of biology, men ARE more expendable than women are.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:11 PM
5

It shouldn't, but biology doesn't care what century it is. As long as women are the only ones capable of carrying children, protection of that resource will always take precedence in human society over just about everything else. The only way the Selective Service System will change is if women overwhelmingly support being included in the registry and support the idea that their inclusion in the registry supersedes the necessity for them to survive to carry the next generation. Even if they DO o…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:03 PM
9

When you think about it, though, we kind-of ARE the expendable sex. And yes, I recognize that such a statement may get me downvotes, but it's not a new idea, as it's been around well before the concept of "law" ever became a concept. It comes down to biology - females in any animal species are the only ones capable of carrying sets of genes into a new generation. Yes, it takes two to tango, but the female is the carrier - not the male. As such, the womb is actually the most important resource in…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 04:23 PM
1

I do it for Science.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:43 PM
6

I am all over this project like flies on shit - the very second they open it up to human trials, I'm putting my name in. I do not want to have children in my lifetime, and I'll be damned if a lover tries to spermjack me.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 12:33 AM
2

I had to stop reading the comments five minutes in because I started to get sick to my stomach. The fact that men are vehemently attacking this boy and actively supporting this predator disgusts me.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 05:34 AM
1

That would be interesting to read, except people in India still ask for a dowry to marry off their daughters and sometimes engage in honor killings.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 01:53 AM
2

You'll get no disagreement from me on that one.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 01:18 AM
7

Exactly. Regardless of the sex, India would STILL be royally pissed that some NYPD officer was getting a little handsy with their diplomats.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:52 AM
7

If it was their diplomat? You bet your ass they'd care. They'd care a whole lot. Because it's their diplomat.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:50 AM
19

Admittedly, I don't understand why anyone would need to be strip-searched and cavity-searched for tax fraud.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter