TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nokappa1 Archive

View 1 posts and 131 comments by nokappa1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
150

Marriage/Childrennokappa1/r/MensRights16/02/24 07:37 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Without context of the following: The custody arrangement The overall living conditions of each party and their ability to dropoff/pick up child His ability to get her to agree to his arrangements if she's the one with custody on weekdays, or if she's the one with the final say anyway His ability to communicate about the costs and the value without coming across as a selfish asshole (outside of having to pay what's already incurred), and without disclosing his current financial situation, and he…
/r/MensRights18/02/24 05:54 PM
6

It may have been in evidence but the judge left it out of the decision. That is more speculation than your claim of my speculation. You haven't worked with/engaged lawyers before, have you? It's their due diligence to sieve out any evidence in their client's favour. For something as material as this to be left out by the mother, the lawyers, AND the judge? Honestly improbable. be it myself or others in support of the mEother, all parties are speculating. Yes, because I'm NAL, much less involved …
/r/MensRights16/02/24 10:50 AM
6

The only area left which is gender unequal is spousal maintenance, where men do not have the full right to claim spousal maintenance as women. You're referring to the part that says women and incapacitated* men, I presume? The man agreed, with the benefit of his own lawyers at the time, to paying. What lawyers? He's unrepresented. OTOH mother was. Her telling him about the costs, or agreeing with him to pay BEFORE the arrangement didn't happen. Because if it did, it'd have been in the report. Si…
/r/MensRights16/02/24 10:36 AM
25

Yet another case of educated Singaporeans failing to think critically. Just look at the dumbasses casually forgetting that evidence enough to single handedly win the case was not found, even though she was represented by lawyers. She didn't disclose the costs and financial commitments up till the point she didn't have money. Had she done so it'd be plastered all over the article in CNA and the report itself. Had she done so that alone would have been sufficient to win the case without going thro…
/r/MensRights16/02/24 10:32 AM
14

It is. The dumber part is that nobody realised that letting the child stay with the father until the mother gets her act together is a potential solution. The dumbest part is that they all lack critical thinking and make arguments purely based on what's written, with no regard to circumstances or context. Mom can't pay? Just go ahead and sue dad after the fact Don't want to handle disagreements? Just don't communicate; hide the information from him Hire a lawyer, win the case and claim the legal…
/r/MensRights16/02/24 10:24 AM
14

I think the archaic regulations to protect women should they decide to not work are still in place here too. Also, it does bug me how so many people defending the woman failed to see that she was legally represented, and any evidence in her favour would have been clearly stated. Many were harping on how the man didn't ask about change in financial obligations when the report clearly didn't mention that the woman sought agreement, or even informed him of the expense. This is despite her being leg…
/r/MensRights16/02/24 10:17 AM
9

The article does not include enough info. The second link details the circumstances, the judgement and the rationale behind it. However, there are also some fathers who are cheap shitheads. This man has been paying at least 3k a month, and is on the hook for all educational expenses. He has also been paying the entire time. I'm not sure if the 3k is inclusive, but nonetheless I think that'd be enough for me to not call him a deadbeat or a shithead. Singapore's WC is archaic and hasn't been updat…
/r/MensRights16/02/24 08:55 AM
13

His bank account and the state effectively giving a blank cheque to the ex-wife for child support are two different matters. I don't see how affordability should come into the picture. Taking it out on the kid, cause your relationship fell apart, no bueno! The man's been paying though? I don't see how that's "taking it out on the kid". unless you have cash to burn. Also, shouldn't it be that the mother realises that SHE doesn't have the cash to burn and NOT make this decision instead of spending…
/r/MensRights16/02/24 08:10 AM
3

Think again. The particular person.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 11:53 AM
22

And who do you think bears the consequences of most decisions made by that family, be it any member?
/r/MensRights30/12/23 03:45 PM
3

Firstly, how much amoranth makes is by and large a fact. Secondly, it's really not like amoranth really does anything of value other than essentially selling her body either. Which is practically impossible for a man to do, whether you like it or not. Heck, even the jokers screwing everyone else over on wall street at least create value for their paymasters. You can't stop people, whether MRA or feminists, from thinking what they want to think, especially in this case where the facts are laid ou…
/r/MensRights16/12/23 02:39 AM
9

Very few creators on OF make a living and the median earning is not that much more then forms of passive income. But it IS an option, given as largely a birthright, since almost all women go through puberty normally and gain the "desirable" features that men are apparently paying for. I agree that there's the halo effect in play here, but to say that it's an option's not as good as it appears (newsflash: hardly anything is) is an utterly different statement from it being a privilege. Just like h…
/r/MensRights15/12/23 10:44 PM
1

Y'know, I don't seem to remember the last time I saw actual misogyny online that wasn't either a response to blatant misandry, or a logical explanation of men's perspective which was rejected by women just because they don't benefit women. That, or they might all have been downvoted to oblivion and hence we never see them. What do I know? I'm just someone who has my opinion invalidated because of what's between my legs.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 11:56 AM
40

but woman with depression needs to see a therapist and needs help immediately. You forgot the part where there was no prior mention that the woman has depression, or even signs of that.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 10:53 AM
9

Same as father's day isn't it? Mother throws out an idea, father drives and pays.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 07:46 AM
1

what % of prenups hold up on court is based on a different reality I think it's only fair to treat <100% as 0% when the consequences are so impactful and long lasting. On top of that, it's a legal document. When outside of marriage would a signed legal document be simply disregarded and thrown away, other than those signed by someone clearly not in a sound state of mind? Tend to is not good enough when it's potentially life changing in a bad way.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 05:22 AM
1

Just my thoughts on the obligations dictated by many governments (some with legal precedents): Governments also actively appeal to women by setting up systemic difficulties for men to get custody of their children as well as providing child support and alimony in majority of cases to encourage marriage and childbirth, as an attempt to cope with the declining birthrate observed in most developed countries. I'm not sure why this hasn't been updated for the later half of a century since women joine…
/r/MensRights23/09/23 09:14 PM
10

Not every woman is trying to destroy us, or steal from us. There are many great and good women out there, who value, respect and love men. Between the sizeable population of women who're malicious and the various life-wrecking negative consequences should you encounter one, there's no good reason for men to actively embrace the "good ones". Until such point women call each other out for ridiculous behaviour and laws are updated to reflect the equality in today's society and offer comparable prot…
/r/MensRights20/09/23 10:04 PM
5

Does that sub not autoban you for your activity here?
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:58 AM
3

how we can begin to shift that mindset Can't change how people choose to view us bro. That said, the closest you can get is for enough men to collectively withdraw their participation from society, enough for women to feel the impact of said withdrawal, realise their mistake and to start calling other women out for the current nonsensical behaviour we're seeing. Will take a while.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 08:29 PM
1

And what is the issue with that? Do elaborate, since you made like 3 different points in 1 statement and jumped to speaking about girls in the next statement.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:48 PM
1

That was directly quoted from MR NukeTheCow and aren't of my own.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:34 PM
1

Maybe because boys have an innate understanding of what's acceptable behavior, or, more likely perhaps, because because boys are taught, from an early age, what is and isn't acceptable behavior. But this lack of open display of love is what we should be allowing boys to display and receive, to accept and to help them grow emotionally, isn't it? Why do we want men to become void of emotion, at a young age when they're still growing? So that when they're confused by how outsiders treat them harshl…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:24 PM
6

People here don't bash men, or woman for that fact, just because they're men or women. They look at and address the underlying topic at hand. If you're coming in unreasonably expecting support just because you're a man... you'll get laughed out pretty quickly. Y'know, unless the ones who downvoted the comment you replied to are men, proving me wrong...
/r/MensRights14/09/23 05:36 PM
4

When one becomes too logical and fails to see the blind spot that children live in a different world until they grow up and start understanding that humans can't be thought of as good by default. He literally said it was possessive/jealous/rude behaviour. https://www.reddit.com/r/MadeMeSmile/comments/16hr9r3/comment/k0kjlmd/?context=3 I don't think that child (or any child that age doing that) knows the first two words, and gets called the third occasionally without truly knowing what that word …
/r/MensRights14/09/23 04:50 PM
-16

pretty rare to hear men bashing women here Rare? Try throwing out an argument on here without sound logic and you'll get sent out the door with downvotes fairly quickly, whether the subject involved is a man or a woman. Edit: Okay y'all, my point here was: Man makes sound argument/counter-argument/point, no bashing. Women makes sound argument/counter-argument/point, no bashing. Man makes bad argument/counter-argument/point, bashing. From both men and women (lurking in a man's space, may I know f…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 04:43 PM
18

If you look at this from another perspective, women win custody battles so often (statistically) that they can't deal with a loss. Interesting, isn't it?
/r/MensRights29/08/23 03:02 PM
2

Largely. Which sort of lines up with my belief that only parent-child relationships can be a truly unconditional display of love.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 06:10 PM
17

At this point perhaps only widows are deserving of empathy.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 04:06 PM
2

But there's no internet on Mars yet how'd they post on social media /s
/r/MensRights10/05/23 02:44 AM
1

Well in which part of the entire comment did i mention i agreed with their approach? I hate it as much as the next person in this thread does. But it is what it is, and there's nothing I can do individually
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:16 PM
2

If you take into consideration the dwindling birth rates (i.e. TFR < replacement rate of 2.1 in most developed countries), you'll see tbe true issue at hand regarding childbirth. It goes something like this: Government needs kids. Women are the ones who bear these kids. Make policies overwhelmingly in favour of women. Profit. The fact that children in poverty/single parent families are likely to be a wage slave their entire lives only serves to help the gov once the kids are born. So, what role …
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:20 AM
5

In this day and age? Probably the moment the mother’s ultrasound detects the boy part.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 08:31 PM
1

My question is do y’all hate feminism or the way feminism is portrayed now? The issue here is that people are going to act in preserving their own (and by extension their group's) self interests. Women are preserving their own self interests, by wanting to have their cake and eat it. (i.e. promiscuous younger days and rely on men financially when they start losing their charm, freedom of fucking around while claiming alimony + CS from their ex-spouse). It's understandable that people want to pro…
/r/MensRights04/04/23 05:50 AM
7

That sub is utter nonsense. You get downvoted to hell for simply taking the male's side in most cases if the other party involved is a female. The only exceptions I've found are when it's a boy vs an adult woman, or when the situation is so clear cut that they cannot deny it (straight up right and wrong scenario). Left a while back and never looked back. That said, men really shouldn't be asking for women's opinions that much when it comes to making decisions. It's the same reason why government…
/r/MensRights26/01/23 05:51 PM
2

You need to remember that they come from the perspective that they do not have to consider men's feelings. You can't say they're wrong once you take that out of the equation, as they do. We're able to percieve from their perspective, unlike them.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 06:31 AM
15

Objectively she's correct, in the sense that she's looking after her (and her own kind's) best interests, by wanting the best of both worlds. Men need to hold them accountable for their actions by saying no to these women. At least 1 generation of women will be destroyed by their own selfishness at this point.
/r/MensRights25/01/23 07:56 PM
305

So many things wrong about the entire thread. OP was assaulted. People are defending the woman just because she's a woman? lots of mental gymnastics just to defend her action of stopping, letting OP catch up, and then assaulting OP. Does she think the road is hers, or what? I can't tell if she did it maliciously or intentionally. Someone doing a daily jog would usually be in light clothing and running shoes, and jogging would indicate that he's running at a leisurely, relatively fixed pace. I do…
/r/MensRights15/01/23 06:44 PM
2

The moat important thing you missed in this entire conversation is that we're coming from the rational perspective. Which is definitely not the case for a say, 5 year old kid, who's more likely to think "why doesn't mummy love me".
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 11:25 PM
5

Without going into the topic of fathers picking up the slack for mothers, it's usually not possible for the father to become the primary emotional caregiver. Could be reasons such as the father not having received such emotional support, and as such not knowing how to do so, or that he might need to take up a more disciplinary role towards the child, in which case it's hard to balance these 2 opposite roles, especially from the perspective of a child (would be confusing to see). Healthy coping m…
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 11:08 PM
9

Frankly, little foetus with a penis here should be aborted. Misogyny aside, he's pretty much certainly going to be denied emotional support from the one person who's supposed to provide emotional support and nuturing (the mother), and boys aren't really going to be getting it anywhere else. Our little boy here's going to (at least) go through a painful phase of not knowing how to express his feelings/get it out of his system. That... is unfortunately how we end up with unnecessary violence, like…
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 07:19 PM
0

The insurance industry goes off statistics when it comes to premiums. On motor vehicle insurance specifically, even if we were to put aside the fact that men are on the road way more than women are, men are more likely to get into serious accidents especially at a young age, where they drive more impulsively. Women on the other hand are more likely to get into fender benders due to poorer spacial awareness, lack of interest in driving (properly), and wanting to multitask (talking/using their pho…
/r/MensRights14/01/23 07:58 AM
12

Honestly I'd love to see something like that happen, if only for the sake of the kids. Your entire paragraph details that child-rearing IS a learned skillset. And while women generally do these jobs, we cannot determine that they've done it "better" because there's no comparison available. On that note, I believe there has been evidence that children from single father families do better than single mother families.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 02:02 PM
3

Interesting, thanks for info! In which case both genders betrayed God in that sense, so I don't even know what they're on.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 12:46 PM
2

Not christian, but afaik Eve was the one who fell to the temptation, and ate the forbidden fruit, and asked Adam to eat it too. So apparently even God holds men accountable for women's actions instead of the women herself. Correct me if I'm wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 07:17 AM
1

Why Are People Typing Like This It's So Hard To Read. But well, they're going to have their way. That's something pretty well established by now.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/22 07:18 PM
523

He wasn't destroyed by "one unfortunate night". He was destroyed by "one false accusation".
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:14 AM
2

Most men rainbow-f-word-ize themselves to have a shot at reproduction and they will be brainwashed or identify with the feminine. Until they get screwed hard by the system. Wouldn't allowing them in this sub let them see the issues with what they're doing?
/r/MensRights26/12/22 09:19 PM
0

To answer your question directly: it's their birthright. That said, I sense some frustrations from your end. I think regardless of gender, there will always be things beyond ourselves that we don't have the capacity to understand or reason logically. Since there's a claim here (whether by you or people who support this idea) shouldn't we also use this ability to reason logically to come up with a more feasible, middle of the road solution to reach out to more men, rather than shutting them off?
/r/MensRights26/12/22 07:58 PM
7

My condolences. What's this got to do with MR though.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 02:18 AM
4

Why are you drifting away from the point that men are stakeholders in the decision to have children*? Edit*
/r/MensRights21/12/22 05:42 PM
7

? Are you saying child support isn't a thing? Where's the abortion equivalent for men when they don't want the kid? Give us some of what you're smoking
/r/MensRights21/12/22 05:34 PM
10

At this point just abort if you're expecting a son. Saves him the agony of being brought up in such a misandristic family.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 05:22 PM
34

men’s rights is bs The fact that your post is allowed to stay up when the reverse would be bashed and deleted, and the user banned in no time at all speaks volumes. This is before considering WHY you feel a need to barge into a MRA forum to whine about women's problems. all the things that men are judged and bullied for are associated with femininity and women. Like? Women wanting to feminise men for the better half of the past century? debating abortion when it has literally nothing to do I can…
/r/MensRights21/12/22 05:17 PM
1

Who'd have thought letting the children grow under a parent who's more likely to think and behave rationally instead of emotionally leads to the children learning how to think and behave rationally? /s
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 05:24 AM
1

He was working when you met him. But he simply refuses because he doesn't want to work anymore.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 05:11 AM
1

Well, what can you do if your husband simply refused to look for a job/go to work?
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 04:08 PM
1

You really have an idealised unrealistic view of having kids. Ad hominem argument there. Rude. First you’ve got NO idea how hard it is until you are in it. And I said that it was one's conscious choice to become a parent earlier. You mean you took up over 2 decades of commitment without knowing how hard it is? That's on you. Second people change (or sometimes show true colors) after having a kid, pushing an unfair burden on one of the parents. Yes, both men and women. Seen it go both ways. Even …
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 05:13 AM
0

Not sure why you raised 2 replies to the same thread. But yea, I replied there.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 03:11 PM
1

I agree it's hard. Kids don't act rationally more often than not. However, my perspective on this matter is that both parents should be relatively stable and ready BEFORE they have kids, so I'm honestly not sure why people are complaining about the "mini me" they DECIDE to bring to this planet. After all, your children are the people you're supposed to show unconditional love to, no? Can't say the same for a job, which is to make money for our own survival. Essentially, people have no choice but…
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 03:10 PM
3

Grass is always greener on the other side eh? There's always pros and cons to both, as well as moments that make you wish you were on the other side. But hey, at least women have the choice of deciding for themselves whether they want to be SAHMs or working mothers, without being judged by society. I'm not saying caring for kids is easy. I just don't necessarily think that it's harder than some jobs, esp in industries like retail/f&b where you're just facing unreasonable customers day in day out…
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 12:03 PM
1

That's because she is usually the one doing all those things, right? It's her share of contribution to the household (finances being the counterpart's) So in reality your wife should work. She should work to protect herself and not be at the financial mercy of another. In this day and age I agree with this take. But you don't mix them up together. A SAHM/single income family's inner workings will definitely be different from a dual income family. Don't try to jumble them up together and get your…
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 03:40 AM
2

You realise that at least half of the stuff you tried to expand your needless list with is done by everyone right? Accountant, secretary, laundress, driver, personal shoper, event planner, staff for birthday parties and holidays. How many people really have those? They all do it themselves. The only difference is that it’s more efficient to have 1 person decide on minor day to day matters, so one person does it. Usually the non-worker. The only applicable ones are really maid, tutor, and childca…
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 03:00 AM
11

This. Women tend to grossly underestimate how much energy goes into dealing with others at work. They’re making a fuss when they don’t even realise that.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 02:54 AM
1

You don't do that because it's your own responsibility. If you do that, you may lose your things although it's of no fault of your own (can't say that it's your fault that someone decided to take your belongings), but you're definitely responsible.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 12:42 AM
2

As a gender neutral similar circumstance, would you leave your belongings unattended when you’re outside? The answer and reasoning is honestly similar.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 07:06 PM
4

women should appreciate the opportunity to stay home and raise a family while men break their backs at work. Speaking from personal experience: It's way easier to be dealing with your loved ones than working out there, enduring all the nonsense your supplier/customer/teammates/bosses give. No matter what, the people you put up with on a daily basis are the people you LOVE. So it's definitely an easier job in that aspect. So yes, women should appreciate the opportunity to choose, because men cert…
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/22 03:08 AM
10

How did feminising men end us up with man-children? Pretty telling if you ask me.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 12:42 PM
4

The emotional labour as the feminists define it goes by another name with men: follow-up. I'm all for finding a fair system that works for you & your partner. I'm not a fan of belittling efforts. Spouses should be supportive & appreciative & understand their partner's strengths & weaknesses. Agreed. In today's world it's hard to find someone who understands this, which is sad.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:51 AM
9

There's really 3 parties involved if you break the situation down for anaylsis, excluding the kid. Government, woman, man. Government wants kids to push up their GDP figures through parents spending for the kid, having more wage slaves, people contributing to the pensions so that the old people sitting in their government posts can actually take out their pensions, and to buy properties so that when the time comes they can sell their houses to these people at a profit, and of course children to …
/r/MensRights12/12/22 07:34 PM
9

spend 80% of the money I've seen many arrangements where the woman's in charge of spending, but it's the man's money that they're spending. They spend their own earnings on their own desires and save the rest, while the man's income supports the household expenditure. In such a case, or when most of the household expenditure is paid for WITH the husband's income, would you say that it's fair for the woman to take care of a larger share of household chores as compared to the man? Without further …
/r/MensRights12/12/22 07:08 PM
9

I'd love to see a study that asks how much both parties contribute to the household financially. It seems like they want "your money is ours, my money is mine" AND "equal if not more contribution towards housework". Apparently I've been downvoted to oblivion multiple times in AITA for simply asking whether they contribute equally to the household financially. it seems more fair to me than for each to do 6 hours of housework. The other thing is of course, 6 hours of housework from the wife and fr…
/r/MensRights12/12/22 07:04 PM
44

Stay at home homemaker? she'll complain about doing all the housework. working partner, and split household chores equally...she'll complain that she has to do ALL of 'her' chores. Pay for a housekeeper, she'll complain that she still has to cook. Apparently emotional labour is a thing, according to these modern women. It's called leadership. In a traditional relationship, men are leaders when it comes to the overall relationship matters AND matters outside the house, and women are the leaders w…
/r/MensRights12/12/22 07:01 PM
68

I think his point was that A maid is better It's a transactional relationship and he gets what he pays for, as compared to instead of a normal loving relationship where you both put work in. Where she doesn't put her share of work in. I don't see any statements on whether the contributions had to be housework or financially, he just didn't want a freeloader.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 06:57 PM
3

Am Asian. Have seen petite Asian women with the exact attitude that this sub dislikes, especially when they're younger. Though Asian women in my experience eventually tone down on the feminism shit once they start gaining age and losing their youthfulness, and go along with arrangements that guess what, benefits them most. Oh yeah. The Karens where I am are usually older people who believe that they deserve entitlement for their contributions to society (usually slightly younger than the indepen…
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/22 01:35 AM
2

easier alternatives for cheap labor It's only one end of things. Foreign labour are less likely to spend and therefore contribute to the GDP as well. They are also not committed to the country. That's what they want. Cheap labour, AND people to be tied down by debt and commitment (of which children is a major one, after which there are housing loans, car loans and whatever else). They need the people to be constantly spending to make the economy look like it's in a good state. Guess what trigger…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 04:15 AM
2

the declining birth rate It's the result of the policy failing in its objective. ban contraceptives That would be too outright and abortion Which they did. better off supporting the religious right than feminism As people get educated they start questioning religion. You can question feminism or otherwise, but it has a very direct impact on one's life. Cheap labor is also readily available in foreign countries Yes but there are impacts from diluting one's own culture.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:47 AM
10

Y'all give women too much credit. It's fundamentally an economical decision. Basically: People at the top need more kids to slave for them They are skewing the laws in that direction Women are more emotional as compared to men Give women more power and pray for more kids in return. Bonus: better if they're raised by single mothers, since they're more likely to remain amongst the bottom percentiles and be wage slages. That's the way I see it at least.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 07:05 PM
3

Oh i got that from the first comment. And i do agree that men do it too. Thing is, i don't think your example works because it's a matter of technical skill, not general behaviour/traits/thoughts etc. And i gave you an example of if a doctor said another sucks (yes obviously not going to happen in front of another patient due to professionalism, but still) i wouldn't think it's because he sucks.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 08:11 PM
4

What stuff? What question? What conclusion? Man this statement is hard to comprehend.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 08:04 PM
7

Don't really see it working that way when it comes to technical skills. I'd be damned if a doctor gets mad at another doctor for being incompetent because they are also incompetent themselves.* ​ *Edit
/r/MensRights07/12/22 07:37 PM
8

Whole load of nonsense. There is a difference between FEMINISM and FEMINAZI'SM. Unfortunately as far as we are concerned the entire feminism movement has been overtaken by feminazis. "Feminists" haven't been calling their behaviour and wrongful thinking out as the people in the appropriate position to do so. Because what happens when men attempt to call them out? "PATRIARCHY!!!!!!" You people are part of the problem. This sub is giving true feminists a bad name, the labeling of feminazi's as fem…
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 10:03 PM
1

At least she tried. Still beats those “I’m going back to the kitchen” posts.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 06:46 PM
36

Except you're looking for the charges for men which may not apply to her.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 08:59 AM
1

Link?
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/22 11:47 PM
7

The main focus should really just be teaching accountability. It's a nice gender neutral rule that could reduce violence while teaching about accountability of actions. To be perfectly honest, the reason they do it is because they think they can get away with it. To solve this problem they have to be held accountable as much as men are. If they want to throw the first punch knowing that they are weaker, then getting knocked right out should be their consequences. Sounds like fair game to me.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 11:42 PM
1

Since I can already hear the shrieks of feminist trolls here, I’ll elaborate on (c). The only way that the statement “Men cause 100% of pregnancies” can be true is if men are either: • never raped by women. • responsible for being raped. Some addons: Zero sperm jacking No sperm donors IVF On the other hand, it's easy to prove that 100% of pregnancies are a result of the woman deciding to carry it to term.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:19 PM
2

Intention "clear as day" dark
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:09 PM
2

So you want the money without having to deal with the person?
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:07 PM
4

Even if it reaches one person it will be worth it. Adding to your point here: I don’t know why it hurts so much, and why no one talks about the fathers side of this traumatic event. Is it really just this? From my understanding people don't ask how dads cope with newborns as well, yet they seem to be calling everyone who lets the mother do her fair share of work "deadbeat dad". Seeing you have kids, you should know what I'm referring to. At some point we just have to accept that men will never h…
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:06 PM
3

It's all about her her her in this entire post, it's so sickening to read. Shan't elaborate, i hope this woman leaves her husband and remember to not take alimony on the way out. What do I know?
/r/MensRights30/11/22 09:38 AM
23

That may or may not have been their choice, but their actions sure make it hard to not do so sometimes.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 07:01 PM
3

Wasn't going to spell it out, but thanks
/r/MensRights29/11/22 07:00 PM
10

Halfway through the story i wondered if it would have been any different had it been your daughter instead of your son. I mean, your experience has come to be pretty expected at this point.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 03:49 PM
13

Yep unsubbed from AITA now. Even an info post can be downvoted. I have no idea.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 03:42 PM
116

Didn't have to look that far. All the daily mental gymnastics happening on AITA when it comes to defending women and blaming men... i swear the population wouldn't have an obesity problem if those were actual gymnastics, or even a workout of any sort.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 03:13 PM
2

Not parent. Wife. Meaning: No kids Only women need apply
/r/MensRights27/11/22 04:36 AM
1

Uh huh, and I'm talking about the various factors that result in fatherlessness. Can't talk about the issue without trying to get to the root of it can we?
/r/MensRights25/11/22 12:26 PM
1

Women have more rights particularly when it comes to family matters, custody going to them by default along with CS, alimony when both sides are supposedly equal and both make money. I like womans rights to be equal to mens rights. According to you women should have the aforementioned rights removed, am i right to say that? But is that what you're saying? For the most part your comments are reasonable by themselves, but fundamentally at this point feminism seeks to give women more rights than me…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 12:25 PM
1

she should be able to get an abortion I definitely agree on this one. I've long stated that the removal of right of abortion in my view is the government's take against declining birthrates. Basically, who tf cares if the babies do well, just give us the babies. If woman cant have an abortion and are forced to have the child, the man should also be held accountable. Except it's a problem the government created, and citizens are paying the price. Sucks for everyone involved I know. If abortion is…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 06:53 AM
1

Gonna preface with me not knowing too much about the Netherlands. Coparenting is the standard. In the scenario where the 2 parents can't seem to stick together as a couple this is the best option, but ideally they should be providing a loving family for the kid to grow up in. What are the policies on alimony and child support?
/r/MensRights25/11/22 06:48 AM
1

men having children then abandoning them, Men AND WOMEN having children without ensuring they have a good relationship going and being able to provide for the child, both financially and otherwise. shouldn't be repeatedly having kids and then ditching them. Men AND WOMEN have kids. Ditching is a result of custody going to mothers by default when their relationship falls apart. single parent should be receiving payment Remove this and alimony, and you'll see how quickly people stop having kids or…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 06:31 AM
1

I don't think that the mother should be automatically given preferential treatment I do feel like CS is a hot topic that needs to be fixed, but will never be because governments in developed countries are all concerned about declining birthrates. It's quantity over quality that has pushed custody and CS in this direction, because they are the child bearers.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 11:38 PM
10

instill a sense duty in modern men to stick with their girlfriend, wife, or significant other So once again the onus is on men, instead of both of them? The issue here is that the mothers have way too much power, as far as I can tell. recommend monetary incentives It incentivises women to divorce so that they get the money and get to do what they want. In fact, I'd say removing CS might encourage partners to stick to each other.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 09:01 PM
7

We absolutely should not discredit a woman immediately, the burden of proof should not fall on just them. Yes the burden of proof should absolutely fall on the accuser. You want to say something that has severe lasting consequences you HAVE to put up some evidence to make yourself credible. Let’s not start being pro-discrediting. Let's not encourage false accusations either. I think that's enough, don't wish to rebutt your points individually. Not saying you're entirely wrong, but man who wants …
/r/MensRights09/08/22 07:01 PM
1

That would greatly depend on where they are. Where i live a piece of paper to own a car costs like us$70k, so i'm probably not a good judge.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:11 AM
1

If people chose to live within their means instead of expecting all that much, it would have been better. Sure that might be all that’s within their control, but it still is.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 01:11 AM
1

Your headers say they’re not to blame…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:46 AM
2

Wow. Is a $100 bill worth $1 just because someone thinks/says it's worth only $1? That's straight up flawed thinking. AND they go ham on people who point out what i said above. I hope I don't see this part of the western world get incorporated into the society where i'm in. It's so cancel.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:53 PM
7

Step 1: find land. I don't think i have to continue...
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:48 PM
1

Now women expect expensive meals, trips, gifts and much more. People are throwing $30,000+ weddings. They use to marry in people's backyards or the neighbors ranch. This is kind of in direct contradiction to your header...
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:45 PM
2

Why would they want to poke a hole in their golden parachute?
/r/MensRights30/06/22 08:12 PM
3

Have you tried putting this in a feminist sub?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 04:52 PM
3

As a woman, did it ever come across to you as inexperience from men's part to handle/accept compliments from women due to the rarity of it?
/r/MensRights23/06/22 08:17 PM
2

Personally call it TikToxic. Delete it please.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 10:41 PM
1

Why would the top 20%% want to compete with the bottom 20% for male attention, jobs, or anything? Wait do you think it's the top 20% of women pushing these agendas? Genuinely curious.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 10:16 PM
1

Many do it out of necessity. One could hardly call selling themselves out on OF necessary. Women do not hate each other. They compete with each other for attention.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 10:15 PM
3

It's fucked up right now. I'm not from the western world myself, but suffice to say that the comments i see on reddit in general... From the experience on reddit: AITA's just full of instances where women are never held accountable for their actions, with lots of mental gymnastics done by redditors to defend them, whereas men get outed for even the smallest things said/done that put women in a disadvantageous situation regardless of right or wrong. Antinatalism got raided so hard by women trying…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 10:10 PM
1

Alright i get what you mean. I guess mother figures don't work the same way in that the intimate relationship and emotional sharing usually isn't there, as compared to father figures which are often juat about how they respond to things and act on things.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 08:06 PM
1

The problem is that your statement is contradictory. First part says there’s no mothers, second part says usually there are. So what is it? Are there mothers in your picture? It’s not offensive, merely confusing.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:48 AM
1

For the most part i agree with you, in that it should ideally not be the case. But as of current times there is still a significant proportion of families doing it that way, which is why i highlight that. What you said is true, speaking from my own experience too. But what are the odds that a single parent can financially provide as well as emotionally provide consistently, as compared to having 2 parents? You’re also right on this, though I think that men as a population currently are rather il…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:46 AM
-1

So that's basically a single parent family. Even if you were perfect as a father, the child would: have no example of interacting with women to learn from in their family lives lack nurturing love that mothers usually provide not learn how to express themselves properly (that's a woman's privilege where we are now Probably be bullied at school for not having two parents These are off the top of my head. I get where you're coming from, but having kids is a bad idea if you can't provide those, whi…
/r/MensRights18/06/22 01:51 PM
1

I’ll say this, the women I know without mothers were some of the most toxic people I ever knew. Usually they had mother figures, but there was something missing. Did you mean to say father somewhere?
/r/MensRights18/06/22 01:46 PM
3

Yea they’re butchering and creating terms all over. Just yesterday i learnt that accountability, responsibility, and dissatisfaction with the other person’s standards on something is currently called emotional labour.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 09:50 PM
4

I'm Omega. i.e. DGAF until the end of time.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 09:29 PM
1

If her trajectory (think mentality growth/maturity) doesn't change, you, as well as all other men (whether she knows them or not) will be held accountable for all her negative behaviour. Doesn't sound like a good life to have eh?
/r/MensRights17/04/22 09:25 PM
3

"Safe" referring to a space that's designated (by intent) for men, though I get what you mean by "open" as well. I sure hope that the world becomes an open space for both genders to express equally, but I doubt I'll get to see it in my lifetime.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 09:20 PM
15

The way i see it, not every post is a fight for rights, nor was it ever meant to be. Some posters are just here to let off steam from the injustices and the hate they see from women towards men. I think that's fine, seeing that this sub is meant for men to have a safe space to talk about such topics in general. Also, in my experiences, fighting for men's rights, or even just trying to let women understand or see from our POV can often be an attempt in futility. I believe many men in here also un…
/r/MensRights17/04/22 08:31 AM
1

You’ll be surprised. The male will always be the AH and there’s going to be an olympic’s worth of mental gymnastics to justify the female’s actions.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 10:00 PM
5

He might get off if he lives his next life as a woman.
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/22 09:39 PM
1

Honestly can’t tell if you’re trolling after looking at the comments.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 10:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter