| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Traditional gender roles is not the solutionThe great equalizer is when they still come to us to open that pickle jar. 😅 | /r/MensRights | 22/04/21 09:51 AM |
| 0 | Why can’t they call it what it is?Then call it that. | /r/MensRights | 21/04/21 09:28 AM |
| -8 | Why can’t they call it what it is?So I made this point on another post. Unless she sodomized him then I don’t think it’s “rape”. You can rape a woman because she just has to be there. But what she did was seduce the boy. There couldn’t have been sex like they mentioned if he didn’t have a boner. And most guys don’t get boners when in a hostile or scary environment. I’m not justifying what happened. I just think we’re alll throwing the word “rape” around a bit loosely. As I always say. You can’t rape the willing. He might have re… | /r/MensRights | 21/04/21 02:19 AM |
| 1 | Why can’t they call it what it is?👍 | /r/MensRights | 21/04/21 01:18 AM |
| -5 | Why can’t they call it what it is?I think it’s a little different here. A man can rape a woman because she has a hole. She just has to be there. So unless she sodomized him, then what she did was seduce him, because he would have had to get a boner to have sex with her implying that he was willing and enjoying it. I don’t know about you dudes but I don’t get boners when I’m scared or being threatened. (Some of you sickos might though lol, joking) but seriously how can it truly be rape when you can’t rape the willing? | /r/MensRights | 21/04/21 01:02 AM |
| -9 | Why can’t they call it what it is?You guys never wanted to bang your teacher? 🙄 | /r/MensRights | 21/04/21 12:17 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter