TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nominalgeek Archive

View 3 posts and 112 comments by nominalgeek on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Thanks Captain Pedantic.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:43 PM
–

Why did you let her stop working before you were married? Did you have the child after you two moved in and before you got married? If there was a long gap between her ending her full time work and having the child, why did you provide for her without expecting her to carry her own weight like an adult?
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:15 PM
7

Sounds like bullshit on her part, she nailed a provider's gravy train.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:12 PM
3

Is this what you are referring to? "The weird lesson for men who have group sex in bathrooms: Film it on your cell phone. A five-minute video of the sex, which one of the men gave the cops, apparently persuaded the 18-year-old to take back her original story. At another moment, such a video might have gotten the guys in trouble for making porn and for sexting. But this time, it seems to have saved them." http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2009/09/smeary_lines.html
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 12:24 PM
-4

if it sounds like a duck...
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:00 PM
1

Population booms I think he's saying that population booms most often lead to economic booms, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 04:23 PM
2

except that still doesn't solve any problems. Whos going to earn the money to buy the stuff the robots build/fix/create?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 04:22 PM
12

that's the true lesson here.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 06:57 PM
1

In no way should this be a law that has criminal repercussions, that would be inane. Unless of course an unaware partner is knowingly exposed to and infected by HIV (or another STD/STI) because of their cheating partner and it was proven. Which I'm sure is already in some way on the books. She's just being irrational and speaking from her own anecdotal perspective.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 04:39 PM
-2

I was explicitly making a link to rape or completely agreeing with OP's source. Just saying that her conditions for consent didn't really change, one party was clearly dishonest when obtaining consent. And it looks like the end of my post was cut off... She's talking about a man that cheated on her but she doesn't really say that only men should be punished. as far a I can tell from the linked content
/r/MensRights06/06/13 04:34 PM
3

Well you have to agree that it would be nice if a spouse was caught cheating while married that would put them at a real disadvantage in divorce proceedings.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:45 PM
2

Agreed.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:19 PM
3

Wasn't a man charged with rape for sabotaging a condom? If feminists want to push that, we should just turn that insane doubt edged sword back on them and see how quickly they backtrack.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 01:52 PM
–

I wasn't saying it was, at best it's grounds to simply break up with the person and move on. But in marriage cheating used to be a crime and grounds for divorce. It's not anymore thanks to no-fault laws, but it would be nice to bring that back. Of course only if it was applied universally and equally. But what I was really asking (in another comment) for answer to is where does she explicitly say that only male infidelity be punished by law?
/r/MensRights06/06/13 01:49 PM
–

While I'm not trying excuse crazy feminists is there really that much wrong with this form of "consent"? I mean, if a man consents to sex with the understanding that the women is on birthcontrol, but she really isn't. Is that very similar to this? edit: I am not saying this is rape, stop putting words in my mouth.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 01:37 PM
–

Well she isn't really retroactively removing consent, since her "consent" was based on no other partners. Where does she explicitly say only men can be punished? She's talking about a man that cheated on her but she doesn't really
/r/MensRights06/06/13 01:33 PM
1

well you are doing a shit job of that.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:23 PM
57

you'll be waiting for a long time...
/r/MensRights04/06/13 02:15 PM
7

Quote gold. I also think the way these guys are presented as just wanting "sex", when they really want LOVE is just another tool to rob them of humanity and vilify them.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:31 PM
1

what is that from?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 04:54 PM
1

He has had two kids while in long term relationships. I don't think anyone would consider that wild and reckless behavior. First relationship ended when it turned out she cheated on him and committed fraud on the paternity on a child. And the current one seems very healthy and committed as they are married.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:32 PM
1

Yes, because he had two children with a women that he was in a long term relationship who already had one child to another father. He did his best to be as great of a father as he could... then he found out that his first child (the middle one) wasn't ever really his biological child. Then he separated from this women and remained a constant presence/father for all of his children. (re: two that aren't biologically his and one that is) Then had another child with a women he married,is still marr…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:52 PM
7

I'm pretty sure most of this discussion is about forcing it on non-consenting infants...
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:59 PM
3

OP --> Wife --> Wife's Brother --> Wife's Brother's Wife Brother in Law's Wife.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 07:48 PM
3

Don't really think compassion is something he had to worry about here, i agree it wasn't smart to end it like that because it might not be over yet.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 01:01 PM
2

I don't think he's saying people can't be faithful outside of a marriage, but that outside of a marriage there is no contract to be faithful and a relationship can be terminated at anytime with no lawyers involved.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:46 PM
5

Well to be fair, some assholes might troll her with some threats...
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:37 PM
1

Somewhere where the guy who was fired, said himself that he was fired.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:16 PM
14

Pretty one sided (and selective) enforcement if you ask me...
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:15 PM
36

He's being understanding because he knows he has to. The hordes would rip him down if he did otherwise...
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:17 PM
1

She isn't his partner, she's a lier. This is survival mode, do what ever you need to do to survive. It's that simple.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 05:37 PM
-4

And no one cares that it exists.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:00 PM
3

Do not go gentle into that good night.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:48 PM
9

If he says he's not an MRA, he's not an MRA. Don't push a label on him.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:49 PM
1

simply cite the shit you say or get angry when people ask you to backup shit you say.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:07 PM
2

Can anyone find some article or proof of this?
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:23 PM
–

Exactly, people are first and foremost concerned with protecting their family not strangers.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:11 PM
12

We're in modern times now... I don't care about what primitive cave dwellers did. It's 2012 and soon it will be 2013, where we can finally acknowledge a man's life is worth as much as a women's life.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:42 PM
–

Children first I can understand. But Women, why? Why should a women go first? Is it because she's a mother of a child? What about a man being a father? Children First, Adults Second.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:56 PM
–

You can't win a game where the words and rules can be redefined under your feet while playing...
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:11 PM
3

Please cross post this.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:52 PM
3

Okay, why am I downvoted for a sarcastic restatement of some of the comments from other the subreddit? "/s is the SARCASM TAG people"
/r/MensRights24/11/12 01:41 PM
–

The whole world is a men's center /s *edit seriously people, note the god damn sarcasm tag.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:42 AM
–

what an easy way out.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:08 PM
1

As has been said over and over, she was not asking to enter, but for someone to go outside during the worst of the storm to search for her children.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 05:15 PM
3

because it sounds like complete bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:10 PM
0

I'm not suggesting hitting anyone, but you shouldn't cow down and take it simply because it is a female that's beating on you. Just take gender out of the equation, and react accordingly...
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:09 PM
–

many women hit men because they believe we will never hit back. If you remove that impetus for them to hit first, they may stop hitting... or at least know that just because they are female they aren't immune to someone defending themselves.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 04:27 PM
1

That URL is blocked under "Mature and Hate Speech" at my office.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:23 PM
1

While that is somewhat true. You can earn trust and that's not blind trust. Just because someone can break your trust doesn't mean it was blind.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 09:02 PM
1

I think the only problem is, most people don't see it until it's already happening to them.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 08:55 PM
–

I think the point is it's one thing to "blindly" trust someone and another to really trust someone.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 08:49 PM
1

You're both pretty much correct, why she wasn't charged with the actual crime is beyond me, almost like they went out of their to explain it away or not call her a rapist.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:39 PM
–

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/29/destiny-witte-sex-14-year-old-boy-public-bathroom_n_1638013.html ** Edit: The comments on the huff post thread are pretty messed up.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:20 AM
3

He was paying child support then she went after him for more for herself. He really had very few options, live as a slave or run away and be free in a dangerous land(die free).
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:39 PM
5

That seems like the best way to go, since you have no say in the planning you shouldn't be subject to her planning whims. Contribute what you initially agreed to, she shouldn't be writing checks she can't cash.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:39 PM
–

For the bar mitzvah were you involved in the planning?
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:40 PM
2

Well that's why i suggested bonds, stocks, or a cd. A cash gift that's not completely liquid for his future that can't be easily spent and is only in the child's name.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:39 PM
–

4 figures for a party for a 13 year old (for half or less then half of a party) is a lot of money. Not to mention this figure is in UK Pounds. That's a lot of money to give to his ex-wife for a party I'm pretty sure he had ZERO influence on planning (read budgeting costs for). If he doesn't have fair/equal access to his child why should he be dictated to. He's there for his child for for his ex-wife.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:37 PM
–

parties like this are more often about the parent not the child though.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:21 PM
–

I would second this, if the mother doesn't play well with others and well X,XXX is a lot of money to give to someone you don't completely trust and get along with. Why not just give X,XXX directly to your son, i'm sure he'll be much more thankful for that then for some bullshit party. Maybe in the form of bonds, stocks, or a cd.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:20 PM
–

He's not saying hit her, but making sure she knows she can't get away with shit like that. Maybe he restate what he said but from the rest of what he says he doesn't seem to be advocating hitting her back. Just that she doesn't get a free pass to hit you just for being female.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 03:51 PM
–

Why is the person who's advocating AGAINST physical violence being downvoted?
/r/MensRights18/06/12 03:47 PM
–

but this is also China, which is a whole other world.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 05:16 PM
–

always try to provide a source.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 11:42 PM
0

oh how much i wish i could downvote "swordmaster006"
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:40 PM
0

eg men are slaves to pregnant women
/r/MensRights30/05/12 08:13 PM
–

Another software engineer approves this message.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 02:30 PM
1

Can you link to proof that this is illegal in NYS?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 08:14 PM
–

why are you looking at this like a financial transaction. are you in here to troll mensrights? I would think who ever asks could pay, if you can't afford to pay and want to split a bill then maybe you are going to places that you can't afford. If you're looking to throw money on a girl, go ahead. But if you're looking for a equal relationship and she never initiates a date and pays then maybe shes simply not the girl you are looking for.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:35 PM
–

adults go to a plastic surgeon, not a child who has no say in the matter.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:25 PM
–

if you want to have kids and clearly this isn't that person you'd being doing that with, why is she a 'current girlfriend'?
/r/MensRights08/05/12 02:35 PM
2

I do agree with one thing, people shouldn't get out of control drunk with people they have no reason to trust.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:28 PM
1

This fight should have been broken up as soon as it started.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:18 PM
1

The men don't want to get involved because they know if they lay a finger on her, they're fucked. The women don't want to get involved because he must deserve it.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:13 PM
–

The best thing you can do, is document all instances and find and cite the sexual harassment material in their employee covenant agreement and then approach HR. If these persons who are touching you without permission are in a position of power over you, approaching HR is the better way to go as it's the least confrontational method to resolve this. It also ensures you get the chance get the complaint on record without them attempting to subvert you. This advice is entirely GENDER neutral as it …
/r/MensRights16/04/12 08:40 PM
–

yes the women groping him are the /real/ victims here. you have shown us that way.... /s
/r/MensRights16/04/12 08:31 PM
1

sometimes you need proof to swallow that bitter pill.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 02:18 PM
–

why are people upvoting the bot? Do we really want to see this at the top?
/r/MensRights03/04/12 05:55 PM
1

as new yorker, I've seen more then enough reasons to never want to ever deal with a cop.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:51 PM
5

lots of stupid shit goes on in america.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:50 PM
–

Is it every really obvious? The second you let pigscops make judgement calls you open the door for this exact problem.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 02:23 PM
1

Yeah, sorry must have misread your reading of my comment. I'm all about context, after I read the original article I went searching to see what I could find out about this guys kids. I mean something had to amiss there, clearly his wife left him and he missed 17 years of their lives. I knew someone had to try to hit him up for money, I'm saddened by the fact that his ex-wife hasn't come forward and forgiven him for any backdated CS. I wonder if she believed he was innocent? If she ended the marr…
/r/MensRights27/03/12 01:59 PM
2

http://tdn.com/news/local/cnn-program-features-wrongfully-imprisoned-man-now-living-in-longview/article_346de4ce-7552-11e1-9bad-001871e3ce6c.html\ Upon his release, however, he learned he owed the state $111,000 in unpaid child support, even though he didn't have a dime to his name. The amount was reduced, but Northrop said still owes about $53,000, which he pays off with $50 deducted from each paycheck. If this man gets paid bi-weekly he has about 1,060 payments to make over the next 40 years? …
/r/MensRights27/03/12 01:32 PM
5

Same guy from post [ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/rdlkl/man_spent_17_years_in_prison_for_a_rape_he_did/ ]
/r/MensRights26/03/12 05:44 PM
–

Not sure if you realized, but the guy in my comment/link and the guy from OP are one in the same.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 05:44 PM
–

Think that is bad, now that hes innocent he gets fucked even harder. "Wrongfully convicted rapist is freed after 17 years.. and hit with a $110,000 bill for backdated child maintenance " http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1351402/Man-wrongfully-convicted-rape-freed-17-years-receives-compensation-does-hit-child-maintenance-bill.html
/r/MensRights26/03/12 02:31 PM
2

He makes $500/month more then you a month? (before taxes?)
/r/MensRights21/03/12 06:03 PM
–

But I would argue this was a troll post as well.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 09:39 PM
–

It's call communication try it. If you feel bad that he's paying for the entire date, and the only reason why is because you are flat out broke I doubt any dude would take issue with that.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 09:16 PM
–

| I'm going out with him because he wants to take me out. Interesting choice of words, not because you like him or enjoy his company?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 09:12 PM
–

So you honestly think, if a guy asked you out to dinner at Ruby Tuesday's that he expect you to cook the steak for him? The only case where any guy would (innocently) assume you would cook for them is if you invited them over to have dinner at your apartment or home. But it would be equally possible that you could be ordering in.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 09:09 PM
–

I still don't see how that relates. How would he expect you cook dinner on a date?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 09:00 PM
–

I think it's reasonable to point out that you're asking for relationship advice more then you're seeking advice on a rights issue and that this isn't really the right space for such questions.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:54 PM
2

70k/year with no student loans at 21 years old is pretty good even in New York City.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:18 PM
2

While I disagree with you, that not everyone thinks this way. I do think he should address this possible issue in tactful way.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:26 PM
–

Can you clarify the difference?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:54 PM
10

it's so sad when I read this, it seems all too familiar.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 05:11 PM
2

he made a shit attempt at making that point to be honest
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:26 PM
3

There is problem with that as most doctors will refused to perform a vasectomy on an unmarried man. (for various reasons)
/r/MensRights06/02/12 06:20 PM
–

from the story it seems like the ex wife and bio-dad knew it wasn't her husband's kid from the beginning.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 02:20 PM
1

For Christ sakes you are talking out of your ass Read The Fucking Article.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 02:14 PM
–

Remove gender bias of the term and it's underlying meaning applies... Bitch: "refers to someone who is belligerent, unreasonable, rudely intrusive or aggressive."
/r/MensRights02/02/12 09:24 PM
–

stand corrected, sorry not sure how I missed that.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 06:19 PM
–

where does he say we don't?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 05:13 PM
1

Or he was going to propose to her at a game on/around Christmas with the engagement ring and Superbowl tickets as an extra?
/r/MensRights31/01/12 04:49 PM
–

I don't think that's what he was saying. I just got married this past October. And if I had found out my wife was dying of cancer the day before the wedding, I would have married her because I loved her. You know the 'The whole till death do us part, for better or worse, etc etc'. I wouldn't have married her out of obligation. (but I'll give you hes assuming they had a solid relationship) Great lyrics, 'loving someone is watching them die'. Because you're willing to put their emotional well bein…
/r/MensRights31/01/12 04:44 PM
8

I'm going to have to agree with lazydictionary, how can yo move on? Any profession career is tarnished, with a degree in education how are you going to make money with the "SEXUAL PREDATOR" label on your transcripts? I don't see how you /could/ let this go.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 07:34 PM
4

TL;DR Pro tip women, If you're looking for a relationship, establish one before you have sex.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 05:17 PM
–

It makes sense; well i mean, sex is the goal and who's going to refuse? Not many and those who do actually turn it down may not get a second date. But it's true, I may take the invitation to sex on the first date but I may ask myself if I got it on the first date how many other have and will as well? Most likely any guy would ask themselves is this so/gf/wife material? It may be a bit sexist the old slut vs stud double standard. But I have to ask, why isn't the girl asking themselves the same qu…
/r/MensRights10/01/12 05:08 PM
–

I got the idea from the post that he was more so ranting about girls he knew too often complaining about "how so-so guy used them". While they're a willing (and enjoying) participant in the sex itself.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 04:36 PM
1

I think something would been lost if the tone of the article was overly appeasing.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 04:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter