TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

non-rhetorical Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by non-rhetorical on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

last para This is just transparent wishful thinking aimed at associating mere beliefs with gratuitous behavior, and you should be ashamed of it. Go on, tell me I’m “one of those guys” or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/19 08:25 PM
1

I’m not English (I just use the language), but it seems to me that the class system’s seeming immortality simply parallels British institutions as a whole. For my money, there are three countries on that continent worth talking about since mine own country was founded. The French shed their nobility the old-fashioned way, then restored a hereditary monarchy that lasted another couple generations, laying waste to Europe in the interim. The Prussian Juncker class, characterized by its militarism, …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 10:10 AM
1

I may be American, but I can pick up a joke, thank you. You really believe in human rights? The phrase has always seemed to me like a way to smuggle in non-essentials. But I’m not familiar with the act. The English ushered in the modern world! If you’re serfs, what are the Chinese?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 07:46 AM
1

our English, the language of men ever famous, and formost in the atchievements of liberty —John Milton, Areopagitica, 1644 Happiness I’ll cede.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 07:31 AM
2

Have you ever had your opinion of a woman change as soon as she revealed her n-count to you? Situation A: I knew she was hypersexual, clinically. I made a vague opening for her to comment on “how many guys this year.” She passed it over, I imagine for good reason. I was 98% fine with it and 100% fine when it was made explicit to me, via a narrative story, that she didn’t even like the guy in the story, meaning it was purely biological need, meaning our (my and her) intimacy hadn’t really lost an…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 05:13 AM
10

You’re equally willing to turn this around and blame women for being lacking in risk-taking behavior, right? So, the infamous inability to ask for a raise is your fault, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 04:49 AM
2

However I’m also not convinced they should legally stop him if he isn’t being institutionalised. Well, they shouldn’t. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The pursuit. You have to let him pursue his biological function; he’s not a farm animal you can choose to breed or not breed, castrate or not castrate. When you limit his rights, you limit everyone’s rights. Think of the precedent: ex-cons not allowed to pursue employment because they might steal or harm? Is that what we want? And thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 04:06 AM
24

I will trust you.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 03:17 PM
1

SA?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/16 04:22 AM
1

People use "smart" to mean things other than smart. If we all wanted hyper intelligent mates, we'd hang out outside chess tournaments looking for phone numbers. We don't. Some women are not acutely aware of how intelligent the room perceives them to be. Lots of IQ 110s think they're 140s.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/16 06:46 AM
4

https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://img.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/files/2014/12/ednext_XV_2_mclanahan_fig02-small.jpg&w=1484
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 04:42 PM
4

Birth control access and education have increased over the last 100 years, yet so has single motherhood (wildly so, in fact). Explain.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 04:38 PM
1

Same. It was part of a larger evaluation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 04:07 PM
1

Meh. It's more important to me that he answer the question. If caps can help focus his attention, I will use them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 02:46 PM
1

I don't feel attacked. I feel he's deliberately missing the point. This is not a thread about climate change.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 02:42 PM
1

You can't just quote this one link and claim that it crushes the whole global warming argument. Nor critical reading!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 02:29 PM
1

BUT YOU CAN BE A SMART PERSON WITH THAT OPINION, RIGHT?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 02:28 PM
1

True or not, it just makes me think you took an online test in the late-90s/early-00s. That's why I said neuropsych-evaluated. That shit costs $2k.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 02:28 PM
1

Your ;) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan emeritus professor of atmospheric science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences.[35][36][37][38] Is Lindzen a dummy, or is your statement flawed? (I have no strong beliefs on the topic. I'm sure the climate is changing and that fossil fuels are a contributing factor, but that's all.)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 01:58 PM
5

C'mon. I have a neuropsych-evaluated IQ of 145. My SAT and ACT scores were 2280 and 35. People are allowed to have different political outlooks. Edit per rules, apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 01:26 PM
1

Because your kids are their own people, not an opportunity for you to make a statement. Nobody wants a hyphenated name.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 02:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter