TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

non-troll_account Archive

View 0 posts and 321 comments by non-troll_account on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Supergirl and lobo are my favorite dc characters. I ignored all the social media about it and I saw it on opening night. It was one of the worst movies I’ve seen in years. How did they fuck yo Lono so fucking bad?
/r/MensRights17/07/26 08:47 AM
0

Incels are not red pill. Incels are not red pill. Incels are not red pill. They’re pracgiically opposite. Incels are not alone because of their views on women. They develop their views on women because they are so chronically and totally rejected by them. Red pill guys actually attract women. They are practically unrelated.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 07:06 PM
0

Red pillers are not unselected. Red pillers actually get women. Red pill is not incel. They are practically opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 07:02 PM
5

No. This is just narcissistic thinking. All people perceive reality through an ever shifting lens composed of both of those, and nearly all of your knowledge about the world comes from other people. Have you ever done the measurements and math to show that the earth is round, or that the Indian Ocean is real, or atoms and elements are real, or that water is two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom? Did you see George Washington be president, or watch a single event of ww2 with your own eyes? How m…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/26 06:26 PM
1

Yeah but social work is soul crushing and hard
/r/seduction15/03/26 07:44 AM
4

shhhh
/r/seduction10/03/26 03:02 AM
-16

Morality doesn't run on vibes. And Women find asking for consent to be attractive. Go spend some time in r twoXchromosomes for a while.
/r/seduction09/03/26 01:45 AM
-20

Newsflash. You have to ask for consent every time you touch another person.
/r/seduction09/03/26 01:35 AM
-21

First, you need to ask for consent to touch her hand. Most men find doing that so awkward, but it's impressive OP has overcome that fear.
/r/seduction09/03/26 01:01 AM
15

Call thing things like that gender affirming care seems prove that saying that “gender affirming care” just means vanity affirmation.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 03:31 AM
1

It doesn’t have religion on it. Must have been written by a privileged Christian. /s
/r/MensRights31/12/25 01:57 AM
2

My beta empathetic ass would start off trying to that and end up just helping people learn English without ever getting laid.
/r/seduction22/12/25 10:48 PM
1

This sounds like an ad, but the purple mattress. The stretchy latex they make it out of is both bouncier than spring and squishier than memory foam.
/r/seduction22/12/25 09:53 PM
7

What they don’t understand is that there is no relation between incels and the “toxic masculinity” they are aiming to prevent. The type of men they are trying to create become weak, effeminate and unattractive to women, ie incels. It’s why I’ve always been unattractive to women.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 10:36 PM
3

A man who is unable to attract women is almost universally regarded with revulsion and derision. It is proof that he is worthless and worthy of disregard and contempt. This is true even for feminists, despite the fact that it violates the principles of their worldview. But they also regard any enemies of their viewpoint as being the worst kind of man they can think of, and the worst kind of man they can think of is a man who cannot attract women, an incel.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 12:26 PM
5

I have an actual staring problem. It has gotten be into a lot of trouble in life, but I dant help it. I just check out. And my eyes just keep tracking with whatever I was looking at the moment I checked out. It's fairly common for people with adhd. Now, it's going to be illegal. Fuck these authoritarian bastards.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 05:09 AM
2

But during that time window of youthful attractiveness, they ARE practically a prize that all men, even good ones, want.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/22 11:20 PM
3

Peterson is a prolific psychology researcher, and one of the most highly cited scholars in the field of personality research. A person may not like some of his political positions, but his psychology lectures are the lectures of a highly qualified expert in psychology and personality, teaching at a university level. The political atmosphere today is deeply unsettling and the way the left demonizes him reminds me of the way my religious family growing up would demonize anything that wasn't explic…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 04:11 AM
1

Sexual dimorphism is real, and affects behavior. All mammals become more physically aggressive and prone to violence with higher levels of testosterone. Prison inmates tend to have significantly higher levels of testosterone than the average population, and this is true even when controlled for by gender. Violent women offenders tend to have higher testosterone than average for women, so it should surprise absolutely no one that men commit more violent crime.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 07:02 PM
18

This isn't a men's rights issue, it's a police brutality issue. End qualified immunity for police officers. Create oversight bodies which are not also part of the police organization, (fucking internal affairs). The worst that is likely to happen to the officers who did this is that they will get a few months paid vacation, which they'll call a punishment. But they likely won't face any punishment at all. This is because ALL of the "good cops" who could do something about this either won't (beca…
/r/MensRights14/11/22 06:55 AM
2

Bro, Spears. And humans are the best throwers of all the animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 08:08 PM
4

There also isn't nearly as much sexual dimorphisn in bonobos. Males and females are much closer to the same levels of size and strength, compared with humans. But humans are WEIRD. No other male animal leads it's movement with its exposed genitals. Other bipedal animals have their genitals tucked up underneath and protected. When quadrepedal animals do it temporarily, the genitals remain protected and hidden. Human body structure is fucking WEIRD. I could list tons of other things. I've heard on…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/22 07:59 PM
1

It's not like women chose to find a man's inexperience to be a turnoff.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/22 07:20 PM
2

I've read that it's available in India, but I haven't for the life of me figured out how to get information on how to go there and get the procedure done myself.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:44 AM
2

I'm in the other extreme end for agreeableness in men, and I have had literally no succes with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:32 PM
40

All you have to do to get women is to just treat women like people. Bold of you to assume that I haven't been doing that my whole life, with no results.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 07:41 PM
1

I don't know what you mean by "comfort" in RP. Are you talking about some principle about making a woman feel comfortable?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 11:50 PM
0

RP men don't actually like women. LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 09:35 PM
-2

LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 09:34 PM
2

Red pill says that "love bombiing" doesn't work. On a basal instinctive level, women don't find niceness sexually attractive, they find social dominance and even aggressive sexually attractive, whether they want to or not. The only one who will "love bomb" you is a blue-pilled guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 09:33 PM
-15

Y'all need to realize that "incel" is just a slur for "disgusting" men, to practically anyone who doesn't actually identify as an incel.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 06:39 AM
1

You are an outlier. Evolution has made the single strongest desire in most humans to be pair bonding and reproduction.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 02:18 AM
9

Lol, thats not what they're weighing it against. They're weighing it against the tons of extra money they get from ladies nights because of the extra men there trying to buy drinks for the ladies.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 09:08 PM
4

Yeah, but those nights would end up losing more money than the ladies nights make them.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 09:06 PM
-1

Lol, that's not why they're doing it, and they know it. They're doing it because it's good business to get more women in there, even if it costs a little more money on the face, because that will draw men, who are much more willing to pay money to talk to women at bars. The money paid by men looking to get laid easily makes up for the money lost on the cheaper meals.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 09:05 PM
0

It's why literally all of my friends who go to bars so it, to meet women. So bars want to incentivize women in particular to come to the bar.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 09:01 PM
-2

I agree, Mostly. But I still can't help but believe that all people are between 50-75% a product of their environment. Children raised around violence usually become violent adults to some degree. Children raised by manipulators will more often become manipulative adults. Even the WORST people are not simply born with maximal narcisistic and antisocial personality traits. You CAN be born with severe tendencies toward those traits, but proper parenting and nurturing can massively reduce how stron…
/r/MensRights21/10/22 01:03 PM
-14

By raising her in a household where she was so afraid to admit having sex that she was willing to accuse her brother of raping her rather than be found out to be having sex. Even typical fundy Christian households that shame the fuck out of sex don't create THAT much fear.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 07:46 AM
-56

Gonna side with that redditor. The parents raised their kids in an environment where their daughter was so afraid of her parents finding out that she was having sex that she accused her own brother of raping her. These parents ruined BOTH lives. She is of course culpable for her actions, but the parents absolutely share the blame for what she did as well. These parents ruined two lives, and they arguably ruined the daughter's life before she made the accusations. This isn't your standard spite b…
/r/MensRights21/10/22 03:23 AM
1

How is nobody talking about how MacKenzie Scott just filed for divorce with her second husband just last month?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 10:04 PM
22

Lol who would build the mud huts?
/r/MensRights18/10/22 08:23 AM
31

The gender critical radfems hate men, and refuse to be told that someone with a penis is anything other than a man. They refuse to accept the idea that anyone wasn't born a women can have the slightest idea what it's like to be a woman, and frankly, as far as that goes, I can't find any flaw in their argument. But of course, because they hate men, and include transwomen in that category, they just lump the misogyny of the trans activists as being the same thing as the men whom they regard to be …
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:43 PM
1

Not necessarily. If you're at a club or bar and you have one girl that's paying attention to you and you're not paying attention to other girls, they'll make the first move on you. Did that for the first time in my life last night and it happened several times, and I'm not attractive. Or at least I don't think I am. I feel like someone would have let me know by now if I was attractive.
/r/seduction10/10/22 12:34 AM
3

Girls will make the first move at a bar if you're there with another girl ignoring all the other girls. Went to a bar with live music for the First time in my life last night, with a friend of a friend I just met, and I was mostly just paying attention to her and the music, and over the night, like 3 different girls started to try hanging off me. It was fucking wild.
/r/seduction10/10/22 12:31 AM
1

Rules 1 and 2.
/r/seduction09/10/22 08:34 PM
4

This doesn't really belong in this sub. Has nothing to do with the science of attraction between the sexes.
/r/BlackPillScience08/10/22 01:44 AM
3

I do genuinely hope that you find a way to be comfortable in your own body without convincing yourself you need to drastically change it in order for it to be acceptable to you. You are already acceptable.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 08:31 PM
2

Ah yes. Which is weird. I would have expected him to reply to me himself in order to promote his business.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 06:25 PM
5

I have hung out in some of those radfem spaces online and interacted with them and I can assure you, they degrade and mock incels for being inferior men (just like everyone else does), not because incels care about sex when they shouldn't. I spent time on the "gender critical" forums here on reddit before they got banned for being transphobic, because they were the only leftists I could find who were critical of the transgender movement. They were a mix of lesbian radfems and straight radfems an…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 06:23 PM
7

Well, the connotation of it HAS shifted such that it also can function as a range of things, including refering to a specific subculture of men, to being simply a slur to denigrate a man. The simple definition of it being someone who is celibate against their own choice really only flies in incel subculture circles at this point; foreveralones, for example, reject the label, despite being covered by that basic definition.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 05:00 AM
13

I think incels accept and adopt the label when they give up all hope of being an accepted member of society, but it must be more than that, because we foreveralones are in an identical boat, but we still reject the label. But incels still accept the label for themselves despite the fact that it is now the MOST denigrating of slurs in the English language. But I think you're simplifying why they (We) are like this. Most incels have swallowed the "black pill" an alternative to the red pill, which …
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:54 AM
2

What business are you in where you get these clients?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:47 AM
17

It's frustrating, because as OP noted, not all people who are "involuntarily celibate" identify themselves that way. I identify as foreveralone, despite the fact that I meet all the definitional requirements for being an incel. The fact that most research limits itself to those who self identify as incel is deeply problematic. Most of us realize that you NEVER admit it in public because of the stigma it carries. That study likely included foreveralones in the non-incel group, which would affect …
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:44 AM
24

Even radical lesbian feminists make a particular point to degrade these unattractive men, despite the fact that you'd expect them to reject the societal value system which values men based on their ability to be sexually successful with women. Nope. Your inability to sexually attract female partners is still indicative of your inferiority as a man. Only inferior men are unable to sexually attract women, and all inferior men are unable to sexually attract women. It seems so deeply ingrained even …
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:40 AM
6

As a foreveralone who doesn't identify as an incel, I appreciate this post.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:30 AM
-1

Nope.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 11:26 PM
0

They don't like it when you apply their here argument to race instead of gender.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 12:04 AM
3

Yeah but it still takes days of uncomfortable prep, specialized equipmentand a team of at least 3, including g the doctor. A breast exam is much simpler and safer by every metric.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 02:52 AM
44

Let's just be real though, that's just the shittiness of the American Healthcare system. It shouldn't cost anyone 5 grand for a colonoscooy.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 05:26 PM
9

Dogs experience sex much differently than humans do, and human behavior during sex (particularly involuntary female vocalization) looks almost indistinguishable from actual physical violence to a dog. If you didn't know it was a vocalization of sexual pleasure, you would 💯% think that a woman moaning during sex was in pain and being harmed. And because dogs have no conception of a vocalisation of sexual pleasure, its extremely hard to train them not to be upset and stressed by human sexual activ…
/r/seduction28/09/22 08:49 PM
1

That was lucky. More often than not,it will be a turn off.
/r/seduction25/09/22 04:37 PM
9

My therapist didn't even bother trying to change my mind when I told her I gave up trying to find anyone nearly a decade ago.
/r/seduction25/09/22 09:47 AM
2

It will not be acceptable to most of your social group.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 02:55 PM
5

Be careful. There are large swaths of th internet and the world right now that would label this as transphobic, because these are markers for identifying whether a young male child is transgender.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 04:16 PM
2

Well, fat is the main kind of ugly for women. But yeah the fix is easy. People say it's hard but it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 09:19 PM
8

Alright so I'm on mobile so it's a real pain in the ass to cite sources here, but there have been numerous studies that demonstrate that over the last 10 years, online dating has become the most common way of couples to meet, by a very very long margin.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 09:07 PM
2

I am ugly because I lack social skills and social understanding, I'm just awkward and don't know how to make people like me. It makes me unattractive. It is what I'm referring to when I say I have an ugly personality. But I'm also ugly. I have this huge acne cyst right between my eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 09:04 PM
1

42%
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/22 06:27 AM
3

Yeah man they love that shit.
/r/seduction06/09/22 08:16 PM
1

If she maintains the eye contact, she's interested. If not, it's a crap shoot, but probably not.
/r/seduction06/09/22 08:16 PM
2

MGTOWs don't lose their sexual drives though, and don't usually become gay.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:49 AM
1

Incels are just involuntary MGTOWs.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 10:41 PM
1

This has got to be the stupidest thing i have ever read on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/22 03:09 AM
2

OK that's interesting evidence. Too bad the article didn't mention it, or literally any evidence at all that didn't contradict the article's point.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 12:29 AM
5

So I just tried reading the article to find specific sources or even specific claims about statistics, or... Anything. When I clicked on the link, "a growing body of research", the source cited there actually presented polling evidence than men cheat more. This article didn't cite any evidence or even make any specific claims except to say, without sources or specifics, that women cheat more. I'm perfectly open to either idea. But this was a terrible article, and didn't make its case at all. Ser…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 10:44 PM
5

They all have boyfriends.
/r/seduction20/08/22 07:23 PM
1

Nah. Some posts as genuinely misogynist. I've seen people argue that women have NEVER been oppressed. Men who try to argue that Chinese foot binding doesn't count as female oppression. Who try to argue that the fact that women were never allowed to be scribes or scholars or merchants, or own land, for nearly all of western history, doesn't count as oppression, just because MOST men weren't able to do those things either.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 07:02 PM
9

1950s - pathetic virgin 1990s - pathetic virgin 2020s - incel. It has always been acceptable to mock a man for his inability to attract women.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:52 PM
2

I don't identify as an incel, but rather a foreveralone. People just use the term incel to denigrate men they don't like by implying the worst possible thing about them - they are unattractive to women.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:31 PM
8

You can’t even do the single most important part of the seduction process, sustained eye contact.
/r/seduction22/07/22 06:30 AM
2

Well, nice is who I am. If women don't want that, I guess that's my problem. If I could go redpill and become an asshole to attract women, I would, but I can't.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 09:55 PM
5

Having never had a girlfriend at 38, I'm a walking red flag, in so many ways. If a woman were to have something wrong enough with her judgement that she would want me, it would be immoral of me to take advantage of her. Some people end up alone. There isn't "someone for everyone."
/r/MensRights17/07/22 09:38 PM
4

I get angry at people for denigrating others. You make it out like any display of anger is just a display of incel anger at women for not wanting to fuck. I got angry at him for being judgemental of incels and foreveralones.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 09:32 PM
3

I don't identify as an incel, but I'm 38 and women have never wanted me. There's no reason to think the ever will. The only difference between us foreveralones and the incels is that they have gotten angry about it, and we have merely gotten crushed by it.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 09:19 PM
3

I'm 38. women never wanted me.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 09:17 PM
13

If you're constantly being a complete asshole because of your life situation and blaming people who don't even know you I'm not constantly being an asshole. I was being an asshole to *YOU *for deciding beforehand that men who can't attract women must deserve it because they're awful people. I don't blame other people for my situation, but you can't imagine an incel who doesn't do that. You already made your judgement.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:39 PM
16

How so? the single most despised people in America are men who are unable to attract women. You've fallen for the propaganda line that such men must automatically deserve this horrible fate, so they must automatically be horrible people.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:18 PM
13

all of society uses it as a slur.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:10 PM
12

I'm a foreveralone, not an incel, but the incels regard me as one of them, but in denial. I'm unlovable. Women don't want me. If you think it's because i'm "toxic" you're a fucking piece of shit who doesn't know me, but is perfectly willing to denigrate me after knowing one thing about me.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:10 PM
-4

LOL, no it's not worse than being called a whore.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:07 PM
2

Most guys I Know getting married these days are doing it because that's the only way you can have sex without it being sin, and they're religious.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 05:32 AM
11

What's worse is equating sexual assault with rape. Punching someone in the face is assault. Grabbing a woman by the tits against her permission is sexual assault. That's a bad thing, on the order of the crime of assault. But it isn't rape. Calling men rapists who were guilty of merely sexual assault is absolutely insane.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:14 AM
1

What's more, it is a much more unusual an event, which would normally make it newsworthy.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 10:04 PM
1

Huh. Could wealthy land-owning women vote?
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:11 PM
-5

In America men have always been able to vote. Stop your fuckery.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 11:22 PM
1

Of course the biggest source of oppression, by far, is wealth class. But one of the oldest tricks in the books is for the elites to create further divisions within classes to weaken any attempts to challenge their power, based on anything but wealth/birth class, and the oldest further division of the classes has been based on sex for a damned long time. Even among the wealthy and aristocrats, women often couldn't attend the quality of schools that men could, even if they were gifted. In Europe, …
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:47 PM
-1

I'm not talking about the UK. I'm talking about the United States. You're deflecting. I could list every state, and in ALL of them, men, all (white) men, gained the right to vote between 75 and 150 years earlier than women did. In the United States, for 100-150 years, white men had basic civil rights that blacks and women did not. Fuck, Alabama didn't even ratify the 19th amendment until 1953. There are ALWAYS degrees of oppression when oppression exists. Today in America, the single most oppres…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:22 PM
-7

Seriously? Until 1921, many women in the US COULDN'T VOTE. Sure, by the time 19th amendment was ratified, about half the states had passed laws giving women the right to vote, but for the other half, women couldn't vote. And in ALL of the states that did allow them to vote, there is a record of that right being fought bitterly for until the laws got passed. If being deprived of the right to vote isn't oppression, we're operating under diametrically opposed systems of morality.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 04:20 PM
-18

never happened? Come on. Even in Western culture, before the 20th century, there are myriad, endless examples where being a woman meant that you were automatically denied rights and privileges that you wouldn't be denied if you were male. Especially among the religious. Sure, over the course of the 20th century, secular egalitarianism basically won by the 90s, and anti-egalitarian feminism started to have more sway, but to say that women were never oppressed by society (to a degree that men were…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 11:53 AM
2

Thanks, I almost fell for this.
/r/seduction28/06/22 11:19 PM
1

Eye contact. Do not break eye contact first. You don't even have to say anything. If you're maintaining steady eye contact, she can ask you a question, and you just smile coyly. This works if you're attractive.
/r/seduction26/06/22 08:55 PM
1

It's actually off by about 130 years, but otherwise essentially correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 08:07 PM
20

This survey is over 4 years old. The numbers have assuredly gotten worse, but I doubt the next version of the survey will be checking for these details.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/22 07:50 AM
36

Sounds like you're ugly. The only class of people that even progressives brag about denigrating.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 09:27 AM
1

Well I'm a male virgin pat a certain age, and it's a red flag because its a signal that other women haven't wanted me. That's actually the most important signal of attraction for women. So now it's a catch 22.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:18 PM
0

Lol ok
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 07:19 PM
3

I was never able to find any woman who wanted me, so I gave up, but the thing I always craved when I saw other people pair up was so one who just wanted to be with you, and you just wanted to be with them. The thing you're getting out of it, the thing you want, is the other person's presence. I never could find that. But I guess it sounds like that's not what women are interested in anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 08:32 AM
3

Lol it is their complete failure to give a fuck that attracted you to him, get over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 08:25 AM
1

They both tend to be oppressed, but women are literally treated as property and legally inferior.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:22 PM
2

Ha. I like it. You're technically correct, the best kind of correct.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 05:26 AM
-3

oh hang on, i didn't mean to include bangladesh, that paragon of muslim egalitarianism for both men and women. So so sorry about that. /s You seemed to miss my point that, if you were to just look at the countries with the highest muslim population, you would have to conclude that womens' oppression was still an extremely serious problem. Of course Bangladesh isn't as bad for women as Afghanistan, I'm not an idiot. But it's absolutely worse than anywhere in the west.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 04:26 AM
-7

You're right. Most Muslim countries aren't as bad as Saudi Arabia, or Afghanistan, Or Iran, or Iraq, or Pakistan, or Bangladesh, or Libya, or Egypt, or Indonesia, or Nigeria, or Sudan, or, hang on a second somethings wrong here...
/r/MensRights20/04/22 03:41 AM
2

Duckduckgo just uses Bing underneath.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 12:46 AM
0

Why? In strongly Muslim countries women are often little more than property of their male family members from a legal perspective. In the west, Egalitarian feminism achieved gender equality in about the 70-80s. Since then, they've continued on far past egalitarianism, gradually making men the more disadvantaged class. In eastern Muslim countries, women haven't ever gotten that equality.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 12:01 AM
2

It won't be a game changer. The pharmaceutical companies have all the information they need on it; it cannot be made highly profitable, so they have no intention of ever letting it get to market. They don't need to know anything else, and put all their research on pills that can be sold repeatedly.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 11:26 PM
3

I have done my damndest to find out how to get this and what it would take to travel to india to get it, but there is absolutely no information on it anywhere. Both google and bing scrub their search results of any usable information on how to get it.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 11:24 PM
5

You're thinking of Christianity. Divorce has always been allowed in Islam.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 11:19 PM
-12

OK, but to be fair, in Muslim cultures, women GENUINELY are oppressed, and oppressed pretty badly. This seems like some small measure of an attempt to balance the injustices against them.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 11:19 PM
9

The success of those cases actually bothers me. There's a reason that there are usually long lines of men waiting in line to get into clubs, while women walk right in, and it's related to the reason why throughout all of mankind's history prostitutes have almost always been women. When you look inside, the gender ratio is about 50:50, and it's STILL hard to get enough women in to make the place full. If you let all the men in all at once, it would a goddamn sausage fest, and women would be even …
/r/MensRights19/04/22 11:14 PM
19

people who have sex reassignment are a myth, LOL, No I didn't. I argued that calling it "sex reassignment" is a grave misnomer (but still a better term than "gender affirmation"). It is plastic surgery to make the genitals look like the genitals of the opposite sex. In no meaningful way has the person's sex actually been reassigned or altered.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 11:03 PM
17

My point was that it doesn't change your sex in any meaningful sense whatsoever. An animal's sex refers to its reproductive function. In mammals, that is fixed and cannot be altered.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 10:59 PM
22

This happens literally every single time, without exception, whenever I make these points. instead of attempting any refutation of any kind, attempting to correct a misunderstanding I might have, I am simply accused of being a hateful bigot, as if that would prove me wrong, even if I were, and they attempt to have me silenced and banned. Instead of any kind of argument or debate of any kind. Every time. without exception.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 10:58 PM
50

There's no such thing as sex reassignment. Once a mammal has reached a certain stage of natal development the kind of sex gamet it can produce is completely fixed. The body treats a neovagina the same way it treats a pierced ear, and is constantly trying to heal it and close it up as if it were an open wound. That's why a person with a neovagina has to dilate it on a nearly daily basis. If you forget to dilate for too long, it just closes up, and often there's no way to really fix it. Sex reassi…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 08:05 PM
9

No, you don't.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 07:59 PM
11

I give it 6 months, top, probably more like 1 or 2.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 07:58 PM
5

They've experienced success with further and further incentivizing women to come to clubs, so they just derped right on to the end conclusion of their sjw reasoning, all the way to a no-men allowed night. Their reasoning is that women want to come to clubs, but men make it a negative experience, which is why they have to make drinks or entry discounted or free for women. They think that if they just get rid of the disincentive, men, women will have no reason to avoid going to the club, and they'…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 07:57 PM
0

There exists a cheap, reversible contraceptive for men called risug. It's basically a vasectomy but instead of cutting the vas deferens, it blocks it with what is essentially a tiny plastic bead. Pharmaceutical companies resolutely refuse to bring it to market. Not because can't be made to be profitable. It's a single procedure that's very cheap and requires no additional purchases, except for the reversal. Thanks capitalism.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 03:04 AM
12

Less than 6 months? Lol, 2014. I accepted a long time ago that I'm unlovable though.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 01:31 PM
-4

Bill Burr, left wing? Lol OK.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 02:37 AM
2

I bet this is related to this insistent idea that "all women are beautiful" that women adhere so strongly to. Men know it isn't true, but women may convince themselves that this obvious falsehood is true because of this ingroup preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 12:24 AM
8

Saying "that's a you problem," kinda makes you sound like an idiot. Would it ever occur to you that someone alarmed by those statistics wouldn't actually be afflicted by the problem themselves? It's a societal scale problem, meaning it is a societal problem. What percentage of men in their 20s being virgins would qualify as a societal problem? 50%? 80%? Perhaps you feel the same way about homelessness. X% of a society is homeless, and that sounds like a You problem. Or perhaps unemployment? X% o…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 03:15 AM
20

Holy shit
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 07:45 PM
16

a guy being a virgin past a certain age is a red flag. Just saying it louder for the kids in the back, if anybody didn't hear it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 04:25 AM
2

What a bizarre time to be alive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 06:28 AM
3

My sexual market value is null
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 06:26 AM
1

There are people whom I find to be disgusting who say x. Therefore, x is false.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 08:54 PM
4

Remember. If you think it's possible for a child to be confused about their gender, and doubt that all children have undeniable certainty about their gender, you're a transphobic bigot and we're gonna have to take away your social media accounts and possibly fire you for expressing hateful views.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 08:51 PM
3

So what DID THE SHIRT SAY??
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:21 AM
0

There could be a perfectly adequate woman out there, but when you find out she has 13 bodies on her it becomes clear that her mileage is too high and pair bonding ability is broken beyond repair. Only 13?? Holy shit grab that inexperienced girl up RN!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 10:30 PM
12

Nah, it's the equivalent of a job interviewer asking, "Can you explain this gap in your resume?" Sure. That was a time period that i decided not to put in my resume.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 10:29 PM
14

The fuck are y'all smoking?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 07:21 AM
1

How the HELL are you gonna be trans after the apocalypse? Nobody's manufacturing your hormones anymore.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 01:04 AM
1

See how long you can maintain eye contact. Girls rarely look away first if they're interested.
/r/seduction14/03/22 02:02 AM
38

Whatever happened to a simple, "pee on her gym equipment to assert dominance"?
/r/seduction14/03/22 01:58 AM
1

If you're even mildly attractive, men are going to WANT to talk to you, regardless of whether you're talkative or not. But if a (good) guy senses that he's making you nervous or anxious (or even just notices that you are), he's going to back off, because he doesn't want to make you uncomfortable. Talkativeness itself isn't the thing we find attractive, but it IS a signal that you're interested, and THAT'S what triggers additional attraction for us. For men, seeing shyness in a woman isn't a turn…
/r/seduction14/03/22 01:30 AM
24

The highly contested concept of freedom of speech WTF??
/r/MensRights13/03/22 08:46 AM
1

What a silly question. Human behavior is almost always best described in terms of tendencies. You claim that this trend is generally true, but look at this exception to the trend! that proves there is no trend! I mean, fucking really? And for human behavioral tendencies, the exception groups can be relatively significant. Human personalities fall into ranges of various categories, and these factors affect attraction, mate selection, and pair-bonding tendencies. Pair-bonding tendencies are especi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 01:50 AM
-1

I wouldn't go that far. You could say there has always been a group within feminism that was centered on hate, but seeking the right to vote, or getting sex added to the Civil Rights Act don't exactly count as hate movements in my book.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 09:03 PM
1

I've got to hand it to the TERF radfems though. As radfems, they hate men, and aren't gonna take it when men tell them that they're women too. Nope. They hate transwomen because they hate men, and won't be bullied into accepting the idea that they're women too just because they're told to do so.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 09:59 AM
4

Well most of the mods there don't have 2 x chromosomes, they just believe they're supposed to. People like that have an impossibly hard time finding romantic partnership.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 04:25 AM
93

Fuck, most women would find that a turnoff.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 04:23 AM
15

It's not dishonest if they don't realize that they aren't telling the truth. The disconnect between the unconscious mind and the conscious mind is surprisingly sharp. The conscious mind will make up all sorts of stuff and believe it, all the while the unconscious mind is satisfied to let the conscious mind believe whatever it wants, and make the person do what the unconscious mind wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 12:16 AM
3

I have argued with transwomen about this who claim angrily that yes they do have periods, and I'm being a transphobic bigot for not affirming their lived experience. A few times on the internet, and the one time it happened in real life, I was the one who was asked to leave, for being insensitive.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 10:17 PM
2

Just a reminder that claiming to be Trans, and then claiming that trans women have periods, and calling anyone a bigot who disagrees with you, would very easily help you take advantage of this policy.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 06:12 PM
3

This is a battle that was lost the moment the word was chosen. Retarded was chosen as a term for mentally deficient people to conjure ideas of pity and compassion; they are not lesser or inferior, they are merely slowed, delayed. But like every word before it (like idiot, or imbecile, which both originally had connotation attempting to conjure pity rather than contempt) that has been used to label such people, whether by the medical community or groups trying to help them, literally as soon as t…
/r/MensRights05/03/22 12:31 AM
2

No, I despise her. It just pisses me off when people use incel like that. There is no more universally acceptable group to mock, malign, and show contempt toward, than men who cannot attract women. Give it a name, and you have a word that basically means, "this person is worthy of your contempt." But thats not what it means. You're using it as a pure slur. You may want to think that awful women like her can't find partners. But the universe doesn't work that way. Having contemptible personality …
/r/MensRights05/03/22 12:09 AM
-2

Just Google to find who she's dating now. You'd be a fucking moron to say that she's the female equivalent of an incel.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 09:59 PM
2

Bingo.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 08:53 PM
41

Not really. I'm not willing for fight even when it is safe to do so, and lots of people are willing to fight when it's not.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 07:35 PM
11

FDS women don't give a shit about patriarchy BS and other feminist ideology lingo. They actually regard exploiting men in our system as incredibly easy, and encourage it on the basis of self interest, not gender ideology.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 07:33 PM
-5

FDS women are not incels. They get laid.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 07:31 PM
-7

Yeah, the difference is, FDS women get laid. Edit: why the downvotes? I'm not saying that to the credit of FDS women, or to malign incels. I'm saying it to point out that the comparison is flatly wrong. Y'all seem to have bought into one of our culture's anti-male sentiments, that the one group of people that universally deserve your contempt, disgust, and derision are men who cannot attract women. Why can't they attract women? Well the answer must be because they are contemptible, disgusting an…
/r/MensRights04/03/22 07:30 PM
17

Abuse of men isn't merely ok, it is strongly encouraged in most cases.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 07:29 PM
8

What condition do you think she might have?
/r/MensRights04/03/22 07:27 PM
5

The most you could say she has is narcissistic personality disorder, and honestly I don't think it's even a legitimate disorder. Maybe antisocial personality disorder, "but only toward one gender" isn't recognized as a type of condition.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 07:26 PM
36

The actual number is closer to top 10-15% of men, and 70-75% of women, but that's still absurd.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 10:13 PM
1

Yes. We're at an extreme disadvantage because we can't do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 09:00 PM
1

Yeah, fucking duh. But feeling those feelings is torture. You're missing his whole goddamn point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 08:57 PM
8

Of course he is. Men who aren't good looking have to settle for the women who have gotten ready to settle down. They don't get dates easily under any circumstance.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 08:47 PM
4

I support the lgb community.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 09:16 PM
4

This is actually an example of the Trans movement changing the rules. Lots of women are offended that men can just claim to be women, and that women just have to accept their claims as true with no question.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 09:13 PM
17

I remember at college we had a club for "asexuals" and by the end of the first semester, the two leaders were fucking. They didn't stop "identifying" as asexuals though. It was hilarious.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/22 04:59 AM
3

Oh God, flushing it is so bad for the plumbing system.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 02:54 AM
0

False. Women do not want to be in my life.
/r/seduction20/02/22 09:03 AM
9

Hang on. Brock Turner was CONVICTED of rape. He served his sentence. He's now a registered sex offender, and his life is ruined for what he did. How the fuck is that "pushed under the rug"?
/r/MensRights19/02/22 04:30 AM
5

In criminal court, a crime needs to be PROVEN beyond a reasonable doubt, and the system leans strongly toward the addage "it is better that ten guility go free than for 1 innocent to be punished." If you think presumption of innocence is one of the systemic issues disadvantaging women, because it means that it's harder to convict an alleged assailant, we cannot even have a conversation.
/r/MensRights19/02/22 04:06 AM
1

God, it must be amazing to be attractive.
/r/seduction16/02/22 11:26 PM
0

lol 30 was a long time ago. My life has been over for a long time. There's nothing left for me here and no prospects for moving forward. I've already irrevocably lost everything or every opportunity, for anything I've ever cared about. No woman in her right mind would be willing to give a walking red flag like me, a man with already graying hair, who has no relationship experience, a second look. The only reason I'm still here is because I'm a coward.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 02:19 AM
2

Man, it's way too far gone for me. I'm hoping to unalive this year.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 01:16 AM
3

The lesson is don't share that shit, and lie if you need to.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 12:56 AM
3

one of the most embarassing moments of my adult life.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 08:54 PM
6

Hey thanks for the advice. While I'm at it, I think I'll try being wealthy and attractive too.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 07:31 PM
5

I didn't mean to. There was a team building exercise, and one of the "exercises" involved using the name of an ex, and I know I should have lied, but honestly I don't remember it well because I have been blocking it out for years.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 07:30 PM
17

Any social circle you're a part of is very likely to simply begin shunning a foreveralone like me after a certain point, around 30. It is proof that you are a creep or otherwise socially negative. At a new job several years ago, I accidentally let out that I'd never been able to find a girlfriend, and within two weeks, nobody was talking to me, and within a month, management told me I wasn't a good fit for the company. Not worrying about what others think isn't gonna help with this issue. It can…
/r/MensRights12/02/22 11:55 AM
5

Before reading, from the title, I thought this was gonna be about seducing women with disabilities
/r/seduction11/02/22 11:18 PM
3

Yeah I've been banned from subreddits for having posted here at all. People use it to dismiss me in arguments all the time
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:16 PM
-10

Men commit most of the violent crime. It's mostly men against men from that point of view. The true important conflict is powerful men against the poorer men and women.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:15 PM
3

Don't downvote, this they're right. There are SOME here who genuinely do seem anti-woman.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:13 PM
2

I'm subscribed here for the same reason, but I've been banned at other subs simply for having been subscribed here. World is bonkers.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 09:03 PM
1

Weaker doesn't mean inferior.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 10:42 AM
4

Not sure why this is being downvoted. Unless a man is in the bottom 5th percentile for strength, he is stronger than 90% of women. The United States women's national soccer team does its practice against high school under-14 boys soccer teams. And frequently loses. The bell curves for strength capacity in human males and females have very little overlap. Women have to work extremely hard to achieve upper body strength levels which are normal for men who don't work out at all. Sure, it happens, b…
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:29 AM
-4

Yeah but you'd be opposed to the law including the gym as a whole as an exception, so why are you in favor of the locker rooms being an exception?
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:09 AM
7

Get rid of the gendered locker room too. You couldn't have a whites only locker room.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 12:07 AM
4

Oh ohhh girls, just wanna have fun, they wanna,
/r/seduction22/01/22 07:26 AM
-1

Lolwut? I wasn't being nasty. You made a bizarre claim. Antifeminist because I'm opposed to identity politics in general, dipshit.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 08:59 PM
6

And it's also disproportionately black men who commit the murders as well. If your reasoning is a legitimate justification for bigotry against men, then your reasoning is a legitimate justification for bigotry against blacks. But it is a stupid line of reasoning that cannot possibly be relevant to good faith reasoning, and pointing out either fact misses the point. The point here is the victims. Who happen to also be black. Using identity politics to vilify the perpetrators is bigotry. Period.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 06:46 AM
12

Who are the men being murdered by? Mostly black men. NOBODY likes that answer. If women have a right to be afraid of men for killing women, white people have a right to be afraid of blacks for killing whites. But both fears are bigoted and wrong.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 06:38 AM
-1

Deaths caused directly by the war, irrespective of gender, were 50-56 million. Even presuming all of those deaths were men, that's less than a third of the number of women alive in the United States. What a bizarre incorrect factoid.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 06:34 AM
3

Omicron has been around long enough that we should have some data, or at least estimates, on the number of deaths from it. Buy you still get banned from the main subreddits for asking for omicron death toll numbers, and I I certainly haven't found anything while trying to find out.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 05:15 AM
5

But not too energetic. I'm naturally extremely energetic socially and women have never been attracted to it.
/r/seduction11/01/22 06:45 AM
2

Who what is the right technique?
/r/seduction08/01/22 05:52 PM
2

What? Why? That's the technique I was taught. Honest question.
/r/seduction08/01/22 05:27 PM
41

I knew a guy who pulled incredible tail by having a faint smell of WD-40 on him. He said it subconsciously reminded girls of their fathers doing manly things around the house. Maybe, but holy shit the women he slept with.
/r/seduction08/01/22 05:23 PM
1

You're not wrong. The REAL r3d p1ll (or used to be back in the early 2000s) is that women are drawn to assholes who treat them like shit. That's the real way you get laid. Not this, "treat a girl nice, and she'll respsect you, and that's what makes them sexually attracted to you!" There is some fucked up evolutionary psychology going on where they want a dominant man, and dominant men are gonna treat them like shit. Or something. Last 15 years or so TRP has really softened. Not that It personall…
/r/MensRights06/01/22 05:21 AM
1

incels would imply that they aren't getting laid. How are they the incel versions of women? Incels are the ones who are undesirable to ANY women. These are the ones who just can't get chads.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 05:17 AM
0

That's a legitimate question but leads us to the purpose of incarceration. I it more important for it to protect society from the dangerous, or to punish people for doing wrong, to execute justice on them? Or maybe the main purpose is to rehabilitate an essentially sick person to become fit for society again? Or perhaps the main purpose is for society to see how awful it is, so it functions as a deterrent from crime? It can, of course do all of these things at once, to some degree, but scenarios…
/r/MensRights04/01/22 08:41 PM
1

It might actually be that men actually commit vastly more violent crime. This isn't actually an unreasonable conclusion. Testosterone is known to produce aggression in all mammals. I wouldn't be surprised at all if most men in prison had signifantly higher testosterone than males in the general public.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 05:43 PM
3

Yeah real easy in a society that has still shut down most of its social events and locations.
/r/seduction03/01/22 10:27 AM
11

Auro-erotic asphyxiation is when you do it while masturbating. This would just be erotic asphyxiation.
/r/seduction03/01/22 08:01 AM
1

You forgot food
/r/TheRedPill02/01/22 01:59 AM
3

Maybe she was drunk, or regretted it, or the sex wasn't good.
/r/seduction01/01/22 04:33 AM
1

I have had an extremely hard time finding data on this, but women's suicide attempt numbers may also be inflated by a smaller number of women "attempting" suicide multiple times. When I was in the hospital after my near suicide attempt, about 8 out of 15 of the women in the psych ward for a suicide attempt had been admitted for suicide attempts before; one of them was there for the 6th time. I only met one man who had been admitted before, and it had been many years prior.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:25 AM
13

Aside from pedophiles, There is no group of people who are more universally looked down upon than men who are unable to attract women (and aren't gay). Virtually every group and subculture not only regards mocking such men to be acceptable, doing so acts as a perverse virtue signaling, to indicate that you aren't on their side. Fuck, even radical feminists make fun of incels for being unable to convince women to sleep with them. The only groups I'm aware of that don't do this are Christians, but…
/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:18 AM
2

Broadly speaking, Women tend to be instinctively attracted to men displaying high status and social dominance. That's about 3/4 of what they mean when they say they find "confidence" attractive. In our society, wealth functions as a signal of status within social hierarchy. This isn't absolute of course, but is a very powerful evolutionary factor within the complex dynamics of human mate selection.
/r/seduction29/12/21 08:52 PM
1

Of course they have always had value. So much value that they were treated less like persons and more like currency.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 01:22 AM
14

Across all ages? Nah. Today? Sure.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 08:53 PM
2

No I don't. I'm a worthless piece of shit who was never able to get his shit together. That's not an excuse. it's a condemntation.
/r/seduction15/12/21 02:57 AM
2

The article LITERALLY ADMITS the hippocracy! hippocracy
/r/MensRights30/11/21 11:30 PM
2

I myself was a little uncofomfortable with it being named after their father when it was about them, until I learned this. cool.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 12:35 AM
3

Personally, i find it fascinating that ASD seems to have such a strong negative effect on women's libido.
/r/BlackPillScience28/10/21 12:34 AM
5

IRL eye contact is a highly social event which completely changes the kind of event. Having someone look you in the eyes is a vastly different kind of experience from looking at a picture of someone looking at you.
/r/BlackPillScience21/10/21 06:25 AM
12

The other study was actually studying something totally different. The other one studied gaze duration during live interpersonal interactions. This study analyzed gaze duration toward a picture. Eye contact is a highly social event, and its duration is affected by numerous other social factors. It's practically unrelated to a non-social event of looking at a picture of an attractive person. One of the points that redpillers are actually right on is about eye contact. If you meet a minimum attrac…
/r/BlackPillScience21/10/21 06:23 AM
1

more like communists copers who want the soviet union back.
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/21 10:45 PM
1

I haven't laughed that hard in months. You're not wrong.
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/21 10:44 PM
1

You linked the wrong article. This is: Russia in Revolution 1890–1918 and Lenin and the Bolsheviks: The Intellectual and Political History of the Triumph of Communism in Russia Published in the journal International Affairs, in 1967.
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/21 04:07 AM
1

To rephrase the salient point established here a bit more clearly: Maintained mutual gaze can increase the attractiveness of a male to a female. If a man maintains sustained eye contact with a woman, she finds him more attractive. This is, of course, providing that she finds him initially physically attractive enough to join him in sustained eye contact to begin with.
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/21 03:46 AM
1

This was a terribly designed study, but this specific issue is something the redpillers are right on. Getting eye contact with a woman, and then not breaking it, is one of the few things that can boost a man from average to attractive in a woman's eyes.
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/21 03:38 AM
2

Yes they are. Table II and Table III
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/21 03:33 AM
10

Read the paper. The study includes 60 men and 40 women. The "neurotypical" control group is absolutely ridiculous and useless, but it does look like the paper does responsibly study ASD individuals. Spoiler: 20 out of 40 (50%) of autistic women in the study never have had sex (a bigger proportion than the men) and 11 (27%) had sex less than once a month. On the other hand, 57% of the women reported desiring sexual intercourse less than once a month (15%) or Never (42%), so it would make sense th…
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/21 03:25 AM
10

Yeah, a study which finds that 0% of non-autistic men are virgins is a bullshit study. I know numerous men who are virgins by choice because of their religion, and I know a few neurotypical incel virgins. Edit: Table II is where OP got his numbers. The "Healthy Control" group consisted of 57 strictly heterosexual men and 39 strictly heterosexual women, Whereas the group with ASD had a wide variety of sexual orientations, consisting of of 60 Men (45 heterosexual, 10 homosexual, 4 bisexual, 1 none…
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/21 03:03 AM
3

The whole message of black pill is "give up." Like, that's why the black pill is black. "women only want physically attractive men, and you're ugly, so there's no hope." That's the black pill
/r/MensRights20/09/21 07:02 PM
9

Oh come off it. Don't give that, "don't worry about finding x community, just live your life!" Having a community to be a part of is the single most important part of normal human happiness.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 04:33 AM
0

A. You didn't respond to anything I actually said. B. Contraception fails all the time. Even if you're making the highly specious argument that the act of having sex itself counts as consent to allowing a person to hook themselves up to you for life support, The use of contraception absolutely indicates that such an intrusion onto the woman's property (her body), is against her will, but contraception can fail. And the fact of whether or not you actually used contraception nobody else's fucking …
/r/MensRights16/09/21 01:15 AM
0

Bodily autonomy, to control what happens to your own body as a free person, is absolutely a right, even assuming the incredibly controversial idea that an embryo and then fetus are fully fledged persons (which wasn't even agreed on by most evangelical Christians until Reagan's Presidential campaign). Say you wake up one day and somebody else is hooked up to you as their life support. You can't go anywhere without them, your movement is impaired, the whole event often makes you physically sick, a…
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:19 PM
3

Oh. Ok yeah, of course I agree with that, that's just fucking stupid, you're totally right.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 12:49 AM
0

It doesn't matter how many women support taking away the right to bodily autonomy from women. It's a human right. It's like if a law was passed to take away the rights of black people to vote, and somehow a majority of black people supported it. It's totally irrelevant that all those hypothetical people supported taking away that right, even if they're the group it applies to. It is a right. Or if a law were passed to allow the government to come and confiscate everyone's guns, and a the majorit…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 09:07 PM
-3

The fact that the there are women who support the law is irrelevant to the fact that it is oppressive to women. Look at fundamentalist Muslim culture; The women will swear up and down that they aren't being oppressed, that having their lives controlled by their fathers and then their husbands is just God's will. Fundamentalist Christian Women do the same thing, just to a lesser degree. Conservative Christianity can be counted as one of the few actual forces of oppression against women active tod…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 08:55 PM
3

As a foreveralone, I can tell you that there is a surprising amount of loneliness suffering that you can survive. Calling it a need feels... i dunno, flippant? If you think of sexual "needs" as genuine needs, then the incels are right, and they are being deprived of something that they need.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 12:19 AM
1

I get erections sleeping almost every night, regardless of how full my bladder is.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 04:33 AM
1

As far as I'm aware, I seem to have "morning wood" while sleeping practically every night, regardless of the content of my bladder.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 04:31 AM
1

Wait. I haven't had a spontaneous erection (an erection that occurs while I'm awake, and not thinking about sex) since puberty. Is this actually common among other adult men?
/r/MensRights30/07/21 04:29 AM
1

I haven't had a spontaneous erection since puberty. I always figured they stopped after that. note: I'm not counting morning wood as a spontaneous erection; those are a natural part of the sleep cycle. I'm just talking about spontaneous erections while awake and not thinking about sex.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 04:26 AM
1

Nah.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 04:40 AM
1

Personally, I was referred to, and thought of myself as, "young man," for so long that when someone older than me referred to me as "man," without the "young," it felt very jarring. Very akin to being misgendered, I felt mis-aged. but just like with gender, just because my self-perception doesn't match with reality, that doesn't mean my self-perception is more valid. I had to come to grips with getting older.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 04:37 AM
3

Can I just say though, Cary Elwes's and Alicia Silverstone's acting WERE sooo GOOD. Alicia Silverstone knocked it out of the fucking ballpark, but Cary Elwes just did his role so good. Alicia WAS hot here, but she looked closer to 20 than she did to 14. And culture was so much different 30 years ago. My dad married my mom when she turned 18, and he was 28, and literally nobody had a problem with it. They met when she was 16. So He was a little foolish in his behavior, for the time, even though t…
/r/MensRights21/07/21 12:27 AM
2

But it shouldn't have any effect on willingness to come forward if you didn't lie. Even if you can't prove your accusations are true, you can only be punished if it can be proven that YOU lied. If you didn't lie, there is absolutely no risk to you.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 12:20 AM
3

It's an aboslutely mad position, and the research that has been done suggests that there is a clear bias among the relevant diagnosticians (psychiatrists, pyschologists, doctors, etc.) with regards to gender and paraphilic and other psychiatric conditions. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829224/ So the ACTUAL fact is that current research suggests that Mental Health Professionals regularly fail to diagnose women with ACTUALLY PRESENT paraphilic disorders, while inccorectly diagnosi…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 12:59 AM
3

Actual quote: Dr. Pearce testified that the current research suggests that women do not suffer from paraphilic disorders apart from masochism. What. The. Fuck.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 11:33 PM
12

and equating red pill to incels is equally absurd.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 05:23 AM
11

LOL, the way they lump together redpill and incel. The redpill is virtually the opposite of incel. Incels even have their own pill, the "black pill." Red pill says that becoming a socially dominant person is the most important thing for female attraction, so you should change yourself to become socially dominant to get women. Black pill says that women really only care about looks, and if you're ugly, just give the fuck up. And NIETHER of them inherently have even the faintest to do with "men's …
/r/MensRights24/06/21 05:16 AM
-2

Well, let's be fair here. Removing the clitoris is a much more horrible thing than removing the foreskin. Is removing the foreskin awful? oh, absofuckinglutely. But removing the entire clitoris is more akin to just chopping off the whole head of the penis. Are both bad, and should be illegal? Yes. Is one of them MUCH worse than the other? Also yes.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 08:15 PM
0

Well, good news. Trans Rights activists have been overturning laws banning female circumcision, because the only way to describe it in a legal fashion makes in almost indistinguishable from gender re-assignment surgery. They attack the laws as thinly veiled transphobic bigotry. But back to your point, the practices of circumcision on girls vs boys is VASTLY different. Female circumcision is more equivalent to surgically removing the head of the penis than it is to removing the foreskin. A genuin…
/r/MensRights09/06/21 08:12 PM
15

I think it is important to note here: BEING ACQUITTED DOES NOT PROVE YOUR INNOCENCE. It means that your jury or judge was unable to prove your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. OJ Simpson was acquitted of murdering his wife, but he absolutely did it. Acquittal just means, "we can't prove they did it." If you look at the details of Lady Nourse's case, you'll find that the accusations are actually pretty credible, and yeah, she probably did it. But "probably did it" isn't enough to convict someone …
/r/MensRights09/06/21 08:05 PM
2

OK. It's still a bad idea to just give it as broad advice to someone in this situation.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:12 AM
1

...ok? In the united states, and several places in Europe, turning off the utilities where someone lives is a severe legal no-no. It might not be a "felony" in your country, but there is a chance that there are a ton of very serious rules about when someone is allowed to turn off utilities at an occupied residence.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:33 AM
1

varies place to place. Arizona is a week I think.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:22 AM
0

DON'T DO THIS. Turning off utilities for literally anything is legally murky, at BEST, and can often get you in some serious legal, (as in felony) hot water.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:18 AM
5

Yeah, I've always known that.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 08:35 PM
28

My father died when I was ten, and after that I was raised by a single mom, and I can confirm, I'm totally fucked up because she had no idea how to properly mother.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 04:57 AM
3

On the other hand, it does look like some shit may hit the fan soon about his friendship with Jeffery Epstein.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 08:54 PM
4

First how about, just give me a definition of man or woman that isn't self referential, and maybe I'll consider not being "transphobic". Man is adult human male. Woman is adult human female. You have a better definition? How does reproduction work in mammals?
/r/MensRights19/05/21 08:50 PM
1

That's what I don't get.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 06:19 AM
3

There's nothing stopping you from using theirs. If anyone gives you hastle, just tell them that you're a woman too. Seriously, fear of being called transphobic will overcome pretty much any anti-male sentiment in more progressive or liberal contexts.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 10:03 PM
0

Probably moreso a result of women being taught that they're less safe than they really are and men being taught that they are safer than they really are. Which leaves women excessively stressed and men excessively careless. No doubt, but it is still a privilege which I enjoy as a man that any given woman would need tons of therapy to overcome.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 05:40 AM
-6

sure, but I never worry about it. And if I'm attacked by a stranger, I can be relatively confident that he won't be literally 10x stronger than me. I'm not walking around with a sense that strangers are always leering at my body, with no real recourse if they decide to take action. Yes I realize that those kinds of rapes are vanishingly rare, and a huge part of that feeling may be due to fearmongering, but I never even realized that women would often refuse to walk alone at night until I got to …
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:46 AM
-7

This person is stupid. Not being able to wear the same thing for fear of social judgement isn't male privilege. Male privilege is being able to walk a few miles home at night without even wondering about your safety. I just do it, and it's normal. It should be normal to everyone but it isn't. Male privilege is real, but it is overblown, and misunderstood. It's similar to white privilege. Never in my life did I ever get paranoid around a cop, until I was hanging out with my black friend, and the …
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:21 AM
0

As a 36 year old foreveralone, this is what I do (or, did, before my life completely collapsed). This is not good seduction advice.
/r/seduction05/02/20 08:18 PM
2

Sounds like an upgrade to me
/r/seduction08/09/19 12:55 AM
2

Is that so? I wonder how Amazon will fare without her. Or will she stay on and continue running it with him? I haven't seen any articles about it.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 09:08 PM
5

The top percentage of the most attractive men have it as easy on tinder as most women do. While it's a popular incel talking point, it's also true.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 07:19 AM
25

Almost makes me feel sorry for an asshole like Jeff Bezos, his wife leaving him and taking half. Almost, but I have friends who worked his warehouses and one friend who even worked as a supply chain manager. He is a monster to work for.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 07:17 AM
2

Yeah, I kinda doubt Jeff Bezos soon to be ex-wife will be moving on to anyone else, or that any billionaire would be dumb enough to take her.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 07:14 AM
1

There are indeed a very small number of men who are insanely powerful, more powerful than any woman. Well, except for Jeff Bezos' wife who is divorcing him, and she gets half. Making her the richest woman in the world by a long margin, and putting Jeff in like 4th or 5th position.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 07:13 AM
5

Good news is, in Canada at this point, you can just claim to be a woman too, and you get access to all their services.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 09:02 PM
2

Easy solution, just tell them that you're a woman.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 05:01 AM
-1

men can only be raped in a very small subset of sexual acts You mean the single most common kind of rape, prison rape; male on male rape? Strange way to define "very small subset of sexual acts," but I do admit I have had a tough time understanding English language changes recently.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 05:57 PM
0

That's simply incorrect. In the US, rape laws are gender neutral. The social views are the problem. In the UK, it's legally impossible for a man to be raped by a woman.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 05:29 PM
11

Then they clap when he calls them out. Fucking lol
/r/MensRights25/07/19 12:57 AM
1

I like GC because they are one of the few places on the internet willing to criticize the transgender movement. But they're definitely authoritarian and man-hating too. Although I do think it's funny that this sub auto removes comments that link to GC.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 01:09 AM
29

You have no imagination. Things could get MUCH worse.
/r/seduction24/06/19 08:25 PM
12

I haven't paid much attention. Is there a difference between toxic masculinity and regular masculinity, or is toxic now the standard adjective that needs to be attached to masculinity?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 09:15 PM
9

For real. The reason I'm foreveralone at 35 is because I didn't figure out those first two points until I was like 28. Now it's basically too late and my personality is too unattractive and too entrenched to change enough.
/r/seduction08/06/19 12:47 AM
-3

That's definitely socialist talk. Competition will sort out anything wrong in the market, and if, through competition some company gains a monopolistic advantage through legislation, that's just good capitalism. Why shouldn't a company try to do that? Next you're going to be saying that we shouldn't cut funding for the socialist programs that have infected America, like food stamps, or Medicare, or medicaid, or fema, or public transport, or parks, or the highway system. Let the free market handl…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 10:53 PM
-2

That is the entire heart of socialism. You cannot have socialism without that, and that's really all that's socialists like crazy old Bernie care about. If you want to oppose socialism, you cannot betray the job creators too.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 10:44 PM
1

You can sue for defamation if there is positive evidence that you didn't do it. But just because a court cannot find enough evidence to declare you guilty doesn't mean that you are in reality innocent. Imagine if a man raped a woman, and she accused him, and there was a trial, but there wasn't enough evidence to convict him, so he got off. If a not guilty verdict was all it took to prosecute someone for a false accusation, that hypothetical rapist could put that woman in prison just because he g…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 06:17 PM
0

That sounds like socialist talk there, and that's frightening. Don't you trust our job creators? Stop hating them out of greed, and trust them. Don't be jealous of them. They're people too.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 06:07 PM
1

I was a special ed student. I had Adhd. I wasn't retarded. Both of my special ed teachers in high school were goddamn gorgeous, and I would have given anything to have sex with them.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 07:14 PM
1

I actually like the bottom middle.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 07:42 PM
3

Yes but it works both ways. False accusation is a serious crime, not to mention moral infraction, and if you're going to presume innocence, you should presume innocence on their part too, and not assume they are guilty of false accusations. For all we know, the lawyer's behavior racked him with so much guilt on himself, that the accusations coming forward were too much, but his accusers didn't see it quiet as bad as he did, but still bad enough to report, and now they feel horrible about having …
/r/MensRights28/12/18 01:22 AM
1

I agree, and think that births should still happen in hospitals, just in a different way.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 11:03 PM
-1

I have not. I imagine that a lot of, perhaps even most births are totally fine and not even objectionable. But I've seen with my own eyes the way doctors often disregard the thoughts and feelings of women, so it's not hard for me to believe that it happens enough for it to be recognized as a problem. Again, I'm not arguing that they are the more oppressed grou; they wouldn't need to be in order experience systemic injustice in one specific area. I am arguing something that a lot of people here W…
/r/MensRights25/11/18 01:15 AM
0

Yes, I'll grant that a notable portion of feminists take things way too far, and the madness of retroactive rape and "all intoxicated sex is rape," may be good examples of that movement, (something which doesn't actually receive much real support among the left, except from the vocal minority). But the example of "birth rape" is NOT part of that. They aren't calling for it to be recognized as literal rape, but calling it that to highlight how invasive and violating it is. And Again, I'll admit t…
/r/MensRights25/11/18 12:08 AM
12

Ok to be fair, what she is complaining of in that article is unnecessary meddling by medical staff, who are 25 to 100 years behind the modern medicine, in the birth process, meddling which is genuinely violating. I know that it isn't appropriate in this sub to talk about real socio-cultural problems that women experience, but a real problem they face is doctors simply and completely disregarding their thoughts and feelings regarding their health, and the birthing process is one of them, in many …
/r/MensRights24/11/18 10:18 PM
1

Just tell her he identifies as a girl during those times. Gender fluid or something.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 02:08 PM
1

Transwomen are really men. Transmen are really women. Trans people are really people. Disagreeing with their beliefs about their own gender does not somehow magically mean you believe they aren't even real people.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 09:40 PM
1

I know 2 younger men who got prostate cancer. One of them in his 30s, the other in his 40s.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 05:05 AM
-5

An ugly, white, straight Christian male. Welcome to /r/braincels or r/foreveralone.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 07:21 PM
13

Don't worry. Gender isn't based on genitalia anymore.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:52 AM
5

Well, there could be: if biology determined it, like it had for all of human history until the last 15 years, instead of feelings.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:31 AM
0

Oh, I forgot. If everybody else does it, that makes it not bad! I keep forgetting that that's the morality of Trump's America.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 04:32 PM
-1

Statistics show that that is less and less the case as years go by.
/r/seduction22/02/18 08:50 PM
-1

Pretty doomed. I'm 34, and I've basically given up on it now.
/r/seduction22/02/18 08:49 PM
4

Also, don't be mate poached, because your mate will never be able to trust that you won't do it again for someone better, and you'll never have trust between you.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/17 03:30 PM
-22

What kind of person subscribes to both /r/seduction and /r/foreveralone?
/r/seduction27/07/15 09:23 PM
2

Man, I would love to frame it like going back to my place means that I would let her put the moves on me.
/r/seduction09/07/15 08:33 PM
-16

You may consider joining us over at /r/foreveralone. I follow /r/seduction because I hate myself.
/r/seduction07/05/15 09:05 PM
-1

he was suggesting that it would be best that OP himself not have kids.
/r/seduction02/05/15 09:48 AM
5

31 year old ForeverAlone in Tempe reporting in. I'll be perfect to go out with, lower the expectations of the ladies for you, and boom, you're in.
/r/seduction02/05/15 08:06 AM
-10

Incorrect. All the women out there worth having are taken.
/r/seduction12/12/14 04:47 PM
81

Okay, this is how I do it. Bring your chin down to protect your neck while continuing to stare into her eyes. Bring up your hands and say "I long to make love to you in the back of your butt." Flex your traps and core. Slightly bend your knees. Here comes the important part. In a low voice begin to say "wolowolowolowolowolo" slowly increasing in volume. She should be surprised by now. Begin to sway side to side and loosen all facial muscles, your anal sphincter, and your kegal muscle. By now you…
/r/seduction15/08/14 07:41 PM
1

Are you ready?
/r/seduction01/05/14 03:07 AM
1

You can trust me bro.
/r/seduction01/05/14 12:11 AM
2

What about buying a random girl AND the guy she's with a drink?
/r/seduction30/04/14 06:32 AM
1

I wonder how much time it took him.
/r/seduction30/04/14 06:30 AM
19

DING DING DING Even if the original story is bullshit, this point is true.
/r/seduction30/04/14 06:30 AM
3

Actually, I agree. Doesn't make Ender's Game itself any less awesome though :)
/r/seduction04/04/14 11:11 AM
28

Ender's Game. Amazing book.
/r/seduction04/04/14 05:42 AM
1

Quitter.
/r/seduction04/01/14 07:04 AM
1

He man was a goddamn monster from what I discovered later.
/r/seduction13/12/13 02:00 AM
24

About 10 years ago, I was at a D&D gaming session GM'd by a man i would find out soon after was a small cult leader. The single cutest girl I had ever known was his girlfriend. I was there to watch him exercise an evil amount of power over her, and, despite all rationality, she fawned over him for it. During the gaming session, she received an email from her sister, begging her to leave this guy. she was over in the livingroom, and crying. He told her to read the whole thing, aloud. She did. And…
/r/seduction12/12/13 01:47 AM
13

Ah yes, the alot of rejection. Alots of rejection are fearsome creatures, in contrast to the common alot, a pale, pathetic, chubby beast.
/r/seduction04/08/13 11:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter