| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Female PrivilegeI’m not well versed enough in the workings of a fully socialist society (or capitalism for that matter), but I do think socialist aspects like looking after the less fortunate is beneficial. I’m personally independent, but I acknowledge that in a lot of situations people need a helping hand. I understand you disagree, but I want to (and do) help others in need. I can understand the issue of ‘making’ people spend their money on other people via taxes if they don’t want to, so I’ll have to think a… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/19 09:47 PM |
| 2 | Female PrivilegeIt’s more like agreeing to disagree because we’re both obviously adamant in our ideas | /r/MensRights | 06/03/19 09:12 PM |
| 2 | Female PrivilegeI respect your opinion then, and I appreciate that we could have a peaceful discussion about it. Have a good day :-) | /r/MensRights | 06/03/19 08:46 PM |
| 1 | Female Privilegehttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/pentagon-spends-a-lot-of-money-on-viagra/ https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-40741785 I agree that condoms should be funded by the government, but they’re not a necessity like menstrual products are. (edit: sorry if the formatting in my comments are strange I’m on mobile) | /r/MensRights | 06/03/19 08:24 PM |
| 2 | Female PrivilegeIf you’re talking about reusable pads, then: They’re more expensive than normal menstrual products (although the cost builds up if you buy normal pads/tampons the initial payment is too much for some people and can only pay over time, and it’s not like a period is going to wait until you have menstrual products). A lot of them don’t work for women who have heavy periods. For women with heavy periods they’d also have to replace them often, which brings up the issue of having to carry around used … | /r/MensRights | 06/03/19 07:57 PM |
| 5 | Female PrivilegeIf you’re suggesting women who don’t afford tampons to bleed freely like women in prehistoric times (who had much less periods than women do now, because they were often pregnant or too unhealthy to have periods) that would pose a serious biohazard, because blood would be getting everywhere. You can’t stop a period with a few layers of public restroom toilet paper. You can obviously survive without being able to use menstrual products, like you can with not having a roof over your head or clothe… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/19 07:22 PM |
| 5 | Female PrivilegeAnd I assume you’d take the same stance with handing out free food or clothing if you do so with menstrual products? They’re all necessities, it’s just that the need for menstrual products tends to apply to women. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/19 07:09 PM |
| 6 | Female PrivilegeIt’s because tampons/pads are a necessity for people with periods. If they don’t have those their periods quickly become a biohazard for others because it’s hard to stifle a period with cheap toilet paper, and it tends to get everywhere. Although the majority of men don’t have periods, I think a lot of them would agree they’d rather not have blood everywhere because poor/homeless women can’t afford menstrual products. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/19 06:25 PM |
| 4 | Female PrivilegeJust because the majority of men don’t have periods doesn’t make it any less of a necessity for people who do have periods. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/19 05:35 PM |
| 10 | Female PrivilegeHow is this female privilege? They’re helping homeless and poor women by handing out a necessity. Women literally need tampons/pads, periods are unavoidable. It’s the same thing as handing out free clothing for those in need. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/19 05:33 PM |
| 7 | Female PrivilegeYou don’t need razors. Women need tampons/pads because we don’t want blood everywhere. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/19 05:31 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter