TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

noriann Archive

View 8 posts and 215 comments by noriann on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Male privilege?
/r/MensRights05/08/18 01:01 AM
8

Hey, I'm a "radical leftist", and I think the excuses are pure bunk. Racism is racism. Sexism is sexism.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:56 AM
5

I have a hypothesis that people representing those in power are purposely hiring and giving voice to extremists in order to fuel fighting within and between the general populace. It wouldn't be the first time. Pro Tip: look up "Operation Gladio". Ms. Jeong she should be encouraged to seek emotional and psychological help. Well, I can't disagree with that. both the democrat and republican parties ...are dogshit. Hopefully more people will recognize that.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:43 AM
3

Well, let me say a couple of things. Racism against white people does exist. You should at least appreciate this on a theoretical basis. For example that truck driver who was hit in the head with a brick, and killed. Ultimately it doesn't matter whether you think something is institutional, the reality is that people live their day to day lives, and yes sometimes white men are subject to racism. Now if you want to create a new term, whatever. It's not going to help anyone, and it's not going to …
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:36 AM
2

Well, to be honest, there has been a rightward shift on Men's Rights over the last year or so. Which is sad. But I still say the majority are just normal people. I mean you have to remember that the men's rights movement itself was started by men who were denied access to their children.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:20 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/94k7h6/not_just_hatred_of_whites_ny_times_editor_sarah/e3mcfvd?utm_source=reddit-android Oh Please. The majority of people here are married or have girlfriends. It's so lazy to impute negative intent to positive people. Most guys and gals here love women, but they are not feminists, because they believe that both sexes will be best helped by actual equality.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:16 AM
5

Boom. There it is. Thanks PeonS.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:08 AM
20

Well, you're in luck. I just happened to have been a fly on the wall. They asked her whether she hated white people, she said yes. Then they asked her whether she also hated white MEN. There was a little bit of controversy here, as the woman had had past relations with white men, but ultimately she agreed that they are scum. Agreeing that straight white males are scum, she was given a job.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 12:04 AM
2

Idpol is mostly negative nowadays, sadly. It's basically a way of creating new hierarchies and displacing class analysis. Fully 1/3 of the planet or more believes women are to be blamed when they are raped by men Sorry, but that just sounds completely insane. Everyone I've ever met finds rape to be absolutely appalling. In fact some countries don't even recognize female-on-male rape.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:58 PM
1

If a woman truly loves a man she will throw away the contract. WhatZ? Not a single woman does that? Hmmmmm
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:46 PM
1

Idpol is fine if it's addressing an actual issue. Eg MRA's try to abolish cutting up little babies. Once upon a time, gays organized to advance their rights, blacks did so, women organized to ensure abortion rights etc. The problem arises when people define themselves according to their race/sex etc., and create maximum division while ignoring class; moreover, these people reduce people to categories; it's insulting, and it's disgusting.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:41 PM
1

I agree, Kike.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:34 PM
0

I am an actual leftist hahahhaa And I'm curious why you think you are an anti-idpol leftist They're scum. There. We agree on something.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:33 PM
1

Shut up, I have to deal with a pig who done squeeeeel!
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:31 PM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:31 PM
-7

Look. Jr. If you don't want people to hate you, dont' be a racist. That doesn't sound that hard.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:30 PM
0

Sadly, yes.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:29 PM
0

lol. There is no such thing as "equality of opportunity" you fucking imbecile. Poor people don't get the same opportunities as rich people. How can people be this stupid?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:29 PM
1

radical leftist I'd be careful about this term. Because you actually find constant complaints about ID politics on "radical leftist" websites. Liberals/Capitalists love this stuff though -- anything but class analysis.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:16 PM
6

I sure hope not! and I don't believe in dominance/sub situations, you fucking weirdo.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:12 PM
23

Yeah women are a slight majority. In answer to the question, it's perfectly fine to be racist and sexist toward straight white males, apparently. This has the effect of driving straight white males to the far right, members of which at least to pretend that they care about white men. The SJW Phenom may as well have been financed by the far right; it's basically a gigantic recruitment mechanism for Neo Nazis etc.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:08 PM
-7

Capitalism is amoral. Profit. Nothing else matters.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:00 PM
3

I'm sure all of that is out of context as well. Nope. About 90 percent are stand alone tweets. I'm not so sure what context would justify hateful racial slurs against black people as well as white with a few gay slurs thrown in for good measure. Well it's good that you recognize bigotry against certain groups. Now try to imagine how other people may also be horrified at bigotry against their group. To be honest, this is so simple that you shouldn't need to engage in any level of profound thought…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:56 PM
10

People don't like hypocrisy. It's just human nature. So of course they will rally around this issue. This was entirely predictable. If racism is wrong, then racism is wrong. It doesn't matter whether you have a degree in sociology, people see right through the bullshit. "Don't be racist" actually isn't a big order.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:51 PM
10

I find the whole affair more amusing rather than insulting. Now let's change the words "white men" with "Jews." Unless I want to get banned from the Internets, I probably shouldn't do that ;) You're being disingenuous. Of course people are going to get offended at racism. The "SJW" thing is basically a gigantic recruitment mechanism for the far right. And when people try to defend this sort of absolutely awful behavior, of course it's going to be a boon to the far right.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:47 PM
9

Um, wait, are you suggesting she doesn't hate whites? Because that would be a pretty remarkable case to make. Please proceed :)
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:30 PM
12

This is the new editor the NY Times Tech. Enjoy.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:24 PM
11

Explain? I'm actually one of those leftist radicals Jordan Peterson warned you about. I just so happen to believe in gender equality, so I'm not a feminist.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:22 PM
1

Heh. and No. We should all expect one another to be at least civil, if not well behaved. This lunatic is so far beyond "well behaved" that I want to vomit.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:21 PM
14

rich white families don't forget about those rich Asian families. Pretty sure Asians make on average more than whites in the US. Surely this demands an intersectional interpretation.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 09:57 PM
-3

capitalist That's not very Christian. Other than that I agree.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 09:37 PM
0

I’m confused. Yes, you are. I was highlighting the anti-male bigotry in addition to the anti-white bigotry. Clear? Good.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 09:29 PM
30

agreed. She's clearly mentally ill. Not sure that should be a resume for the NY Times. But what the hell, the Times has always been shit anyway; they supported the attack on Iraq.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:54 PM
1

I have a different idea. People (including men) can do whatever the fuck they want. No interference by the state. How's that?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:37 PM
2

Meh. Why not eliminate the state from all contracts? True love, right?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:36 PM
2

Dude, I still remember when I got my sociology degree. It was a total bro-fest. Beer, "hooters" girls, tits everywhere, and not a small amount of Mary Jane. We all got high and toasted the patriarchy. My only complaint was that I didn't get my "patriarchy" and "white male" dues", so I could rapidly expand the corporate ladder, or at least get a job.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:41 PM
1

Sounds like a lotta red tape to me. You know what pierces red tape? Bullets. No, no, no, I'm not advocating any sort of radical action. But red tape is pretty flimsy.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 06:46 PM
1

Cheers :)
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:55 PM
9

You commies can pretend reality isn't a thin lol. You're just as dumb as you sound.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:47 PM
6

It has the potential to become truly apocalyptic Indeed. Easy for me to say but I wouldn't get too stressed about your workmates. I used to work in an all-female office. I won't lie --it was Hell. Wait, I was supposed to be reassuring you -- well I can't do it. Learn how to hunt or something, and be a survivor, I think that helps men. But the predictions "well, it will take at least 50 years for this to reverse", I really do think they're bullshit. "Facts are very stubborn things." There will be…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:43 PM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:32 PM
4

To be frank, I think it will come in five years or less. The whole thing is simply too absurd.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:28 PM
9

Assange is very sleazy Nope. Assange is a good guy. He targets Dems and Repugs alike. He wants the people to have knowledge. That's a good thing. Only authoritarian douche bags hate Assange.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:21 PM
0

lol.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:11 PM
22

Oh you gotta be fucking kidding me. Like clockwork. Now here's a newsworthy quote: "Women, I will let you in on a male secret. Men know that constantly self-proclaiming male 'feminists' are often predatory sleaze bags. They are intensely disliked by other men because of their manipulative qualities and not, in general, because they are viewed to be sex traitors. — Julian Assange 🔹 (@JulianAssange) October 21, 2017 I don't know whether the allegations are true. And while I can't help myself from …
/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:49 PM
3

You may be over-dramatizing the situation. Low-effort memes that appeal to the reptile brain get more upvotes, and as soon it hits R/all other reptile brains join in the fun. On the other hand I've noticed what you're talking about: really shitty posts getting highly upvoted, to serve as a strawman for the feminists on R/all. Black propaganda is a thing, and feminist have billions of dollars to play around with. Wouldn't surprise me if there were occasional shenanigans.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:39 PM
124

except perhaps worse. Honestly, I don't think I've encountered this type of hate since second wave feminism. Most third wave feminists are savvy enough to not say things like "we must reduce males to ten percent of the population!" (Sally Miller Gearhart, who founded the first gender studies class and coined the phrase "the future is female") and instead try to make their hate speech sound as "ironic" as possible. For example that British feminist who "ironically" suggested that men should be pl…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:21 PM
0

The CIA has nothing to do with the narco/government conflict in Mexico. Please, please tell me you're a troll. I mean -- you can't possibly be this ignorant, right? RIGHT? I'll pretend for a moment that you're sincerely ignorant. Watch this: https://vimeo.com/65942057 No "conspiracy theories" here, just the facts m'am Or read this: https://www.amazon.com/Politics-Heroin-Complicity-Global-Trade/dp/1556524838
/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:14 PM
2

Pretty sure the CIA already ruined Mexico with the drug war shit -- pretending to oppose drugs while simultaneously backing drug lords from Mexico to Afghanistan.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 04:01 PM
6

Yeah, I think that's a really important point, and oft overlooked by MRA's. It's not just gynocentrism. The whole thing is a racket. There are billions of dollars involved....
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:57 PM
64

Let's think about this rationally for a moment. Imagine a society in which one sex: can have his genitals legally mutilated, is more likely to be abused as a child, is more likely to be drugged as a child, gets lower grades in school, is less likely to attend university, is more likely to be subject to violence of all kinds, can be legally discriminated against in the workplace, is twice as likely to be arrested for a crime and receives 60 percent longer prison terms, is routinely denied access …
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:53 PM
-3

"As it is, that bitch shouldn't get any of your money." Yes because all women are bitches right? Get your misogynist BS off this sub. 1) Wait. Does that mean calling a guy a dick is misandric? Here's a hint: if you're too much of a fragile snowflake that you can't countenance the word "bitch" in written form you should probably go hide under a blanket or something 2) Yeah, pay her. I'll make an exception in your case.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:20 PM
4

But alimony is rarely granted Wow. Sounds like you guys have a relatively sane system.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:44 AM
21

You shouldn't blame him. That's basically what all men are told. "Sure you can fight the courts, but don't be surprised if you lose 10,000 dollars!"
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:40 AM
0

Yeah so what. Go cry about it?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:13 AM
3

Indeed.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:58 AM
1

Capped, as in the highest possible. If you can’t raise a kid with 12,000 Bitch, I'm not in that position. I don't have any kids and if I did, well... So go suck your snog.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 09:54 AM
6

I wouldn't worry too much about it. Every "Sarah Jeong" relies on a man or men to enforce her will. Without men she is utterly useless, and that's probably the source of her rage. She simply can't do anything without men. So relax. Remember that these man-haters rely on entirely on men, otherwise they would be living in grass huts.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:41 AM
-1

That said, I find the arguments of redditors who HAVE apparently read left wing academics and thinkers, including Marx, to be sad. Wow. Just. Wow. So you're upset that some people read the people they criticize. This is so completely insane I don't know what to say. gun rights. Well I happen to be PRO gun rights, you commie. In fact, I have a thirst for guns. In fact I would like to own a potato gun. Also, who the fuck is Oded Yinon? You silly, silly girli. Thats the guy who controls you. I don'…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:26 AM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8lRjXf2IK0
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:18 AM
1

No that's not it all. Go back to school.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:04 AM
3

Your mom?
/r/MensRights04/08/18 07:03 AM
0

Its not some conspiracy. Like, say, the invasion of Grenada? Or Iraq? Face it: you haven't the slightest idea what you're talking about, right? Former CIA officer Ray McGovern, who used to deliver the daily brief to George H.W. Bush, found torture disgusting. Most US leaders disagreed. McGovern went so far as to say that some people in the high levels of US policy care more about Israel than the US. Hmmmmm.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:29 AM
20

I still say the best article posted on Spiked was their fascinating study of the disturbing similarities between feminist "rape culture" and the KKK rape culture. "Automatic belief of rape accusations was a central principle of the KKK’s war on rape, too. This was one of the things that most shocked Ida B Wells, the early twentieth-century African-American journalist and civil-rights activist. ‘The word of the accuser is held to be true’, she said, which means that ‘the rule of law [is] reversed…
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:07 AM
8

The best thing about "trauma" is that there is no defense for men. Even if the woman emails you the next day and says "dude that was awesome, I totally want you to fuck me in the ass" that's merely a sign of trauma, and further confirmation of the man's rapism.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 03:03 AM
7

Nah they're right. I was planning on working the other day -- I perform (monkey like) a high status/low pay job of climbing things so people have electricity -- and it suddenly occurred to me that I had fragile masculinity. Then it also occurred to me that if I wanted to, I could shut off the electricity to everyone. It was a delicious thought. Needless to say I developed the classic "angel on one shoulder and devil on the other" situation going on. And I still do...
/r/MensRights04/08/18 02:57 AM
0

capped somewhere around $1000 per month WTF. White knight here thinks I should pay twice my monthly stipend to some chick.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 02:49 AM
-1

Yeah but the Mark Twain quotes are real, which only goes to show we live in a misogynistic society run by straight white Kentucky Fried Chicken.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 02:47 AM
1

Twain also claimed that "If man could be crossed with the cat it would improve man, but deteriorate the cat." Apparently he had never heard of crossing a woman with a cat. And besides aren't some cats feline? Fucking misogynist.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 02:46 AM
6

Sadly enough, the Swedish branch of amnesty is against it. What the Hell happened to Swedish men? It's just sad....
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:22 AM
2

Betsy DeVos, Trump's secretary of education, is the person who rescinded the "dear colleague" letter Which was awesome. On the other hand, a Repug blocked a bill that would have prevented men who fell behind in child support from automatically going to jail. Gee Karen, I wonder who opposed that bill? Could it be the same degenerate scumbags you support? Why yes, yes it is. That's why you shouldn't take an explicitly far right wing position. Philip Davies, a Conservative MP, has endured smearing …
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:10 AM
1

First-wave feminism got women the right to vote and resulted in several pieces of legislation in various western countries that balanced the legal system in areas like marital rape, right to work, and right to own property. Here Second-wave feminism started reform in several middle-eastern countries and China, and tackled the social structure in western countries. Here Third-wave feminism still had the momentum from the first two waves, but lacking real issues Here Now go home, dust yourself off…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 04:29 AM
3

No I suspect some are. But I also suspect if you make a private arrangement with an escort the law won't bother with you. Maybe I'm wrong. But I've never heard of a Goldman Sachs executive being busted for hiring an escort.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 03:57 AM
2

[sorry for edit: you really do rock, even if I hate your Twitter linking to far right blowhards] One of the main problems I see with the MRM is that while properly drawing attention to facts like eg men make up about 95 percent of workplace deaths and a similar number of homeless rough sleepers -- some of the MRM leadership supports far right politicians who would see that problem become even worse. Charity is great, but it's not enough. We know this due to the experiences of people during the l…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 03:40 AM
6

Well your first problem is thinking your on the left. Actually, the majority of the left supports decriminalization, while the majority of the right supports keeping prostitution illegal. Bottom line is that people in power will cherry pick certain ideas on both the right and left to increase their power. People who view things solely in terms of "left" and "right" have a grade-school level understanding of politics and power.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 02:58 AM
2

Yeah, it's really shitty. Paradoxical but when you sticky something people are less likely to read it. The bold green fades into the background like white noise. On the other hand, if the mods keep this stickied perhaps we can make progress over the next week or two. The March isn't until late August.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 02:40 AM
15

It doesn't work, sadly. Warren Farrell, who is basically the father of the modern men's rights movement, began as a feminist and spent literally decades trying to get feminists to address men's issues. They ignored him. Then came academics like David Benetar, who bent over backwards to oblige feminists on "female oppression" but argued that there is a "second sexism" that affects men and boys. He too was ignored. Only when MRA's started challenging feminist power in a rather direct way did they …
/r/MensRights02/08/18 02:36 AM
3

So the basic position of MRA's on prostitution is in favor of legalization, right? Yep. Also what has been done with females buying sex under the Nordic model? Nothing. I haven't studied the issue but I don't think men are bothered that much either? Even in countries where prostitution is completely illegal they tend to only target massage parlors and street hookers. They tend to leave escort services alone as I understand it; this is because rich men use escort services. So the bottom line is t…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 02:29 AM
1

Actions like that suggest feminists want a return to dancing naked round trees to find answers to things. Hey, speaking as someone who likes to dance naked, ideally around trees and a bonfire, I take exception to this. It is quite possible to act like a barbarian by night and study science by day.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 02:10 AM
9

Amnesty International supports legalization. They came to this conclusion after interviewing thousands upon thousands of sex workers in countries around the world. About 90 percent of sex workers support legalization. The other 10 percent are pimps (both male and female). Why do feminists and tradcons think they have the right to tell women (and men for that matter) what they can do with their bodies? Sex workers also reject the Nordic model. Said model seems to be a "win win" for feminists beca…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 02:03 AM
3

It shows how violent girls are becoming. Yeah it's pretty disturbing. I don't think all these "a woman can easily beat the shit out of ten men" action films are helping matters. "nice" girls are getting stabby. lol. Don't worry though, feminists and their white knight enablers -- including tradcon cucks on the right -- are making sure that no female, young or old, will suffer any repercussions for any action, ever. Females are simply angels come to earth; we can tell because they look more like …
/r/MensRights02/08/18 01:46 AM
2

Second, often both men and women are "forced" into marriages. Yeah, feminists conveniently forget about this fact. They say things like "in the middle ages, women were treated like property and forced into marriages!" Um, so were men, dumbass. It's not like every arranged marriage was Jessica Alba being forced into marriage with some dork. At least half of the time the man probably had is eyes on someone else, or would have preferred to be a cad or something. And all of these facts apply to curr…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 01:41 AM
21

Yeah that's nasty. The "rape joke" thing is more interesting than it first appears. When we make a joke about a woman or a child being raped, the humor derives from the fact that we find the act horrifying. When we make a joke about a man being raped in prison, the humor derives from the fact that we think he deserves it. So feminists claim that "rape jokes" (involving women) are a slippery slope toward "rape culture" against women, but nothing could be further from the truth. If anything, we li…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 01:34 AM
1

Be the prostate. It's a Zen thing.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 01:27 AM
2

Don't look now, but THERE'S A COMMUNIST UNDER YOUR BED. DUCK AND COVER.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 01:11 AM
2

That dude is a legitimate quack. He's literally praising fascism on another thread. It's difficult to discern whether he's a feminist false flag or just another confused young man who has listened to too much Rush Limbaugh/Milton Friedman. But he clearly has issues.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 01:10 AM
0

I have interacted with many different types of fascists and they are reasonable, level-headed and , dare I say it, mature people. hahahaha. Keep it up junior.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 01:05 AM
2

Feminism has done good things in the past. Example?
/r/MensRights02/08/18 01:04 AM
-3

fascists are actually pretty reasonable and intelligent people Hahahaha.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:55 AM
4

Balls on this guy. My man. The tides are changing my friends.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:49 AM
13

"THEY'RE HAVING A THING FOR MEN! SHUT IT DOWN!" Those bastards can see!
/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:37 AM
1

I'll be on a panel with "the faithless feminist" Karen Garst at Mythicist Milwaukee in September of this year. Yiss. But I'd also like to see Karen vs. Anita (in a wrestle-mania style arena), and Karen vs. Jessica Valenti, Karen vs. Clementine Ford, Karen vs. Bell Hooks. I wonder if I could arrange one of these... It's not that your brutalizing some "Karen Darst" doesn't sound like a lot of fun -- it does -- but I want high level blood, dammit. These man-hating bigots living high on the hog have…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 12:26 AM
1

Is that it's constant feminist bashing and masterbatory outrage over wrongs or injustices towards men. Gee, who would have thunk that on a men's rights board, people would be concerned about mens' rights! You're so dumb -- you're so profoundly stupid -- that you should probably crawl into a gutter somewhere in die. That's how stupid you are.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 08:36 PM
1

To be fair, powerful Zionists (not including your average Jew, or indeed your average Israeli) along with most powerful governments are creating would-be-autonomous killing robots. Sounds like Sci-Fi but Human Rights watch even issued a condemnation of this Terminator-like tech, which is indeed being developed. Wait what was the point of this exchange? Oh yeah. MensLibbers are like deranged, killer robots. Sorry got confused for a second there.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 06:16 PM
5

I think that's premature. You'd just end up with a few diehards. If the Melbourne event is successful though I think an international grass roots protest -- planned well in advance -- could work.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 05:40 PM
5

A documentary from the future: Current Year: the Year Men Fought Back
/r/MensRights01/08/18 05:35 PM
31

I've said it before and I'll say it again: MensLib is one of the top five or so most toxic subs on reddit. It is truly sad to see men beaten down like dogs, groveling at the feet of their feminist masters, self-loathing, self-flagellating, desperate for a pat on the head. All the while ironically maintaining the traditional male gender role of white knight extraordinaire. A lot of those poor saps were probably raised by single mothers or are extremely unattractive. They're desperate for female a…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 04:37 PM
2

Hey Karen, speaking of crying... You're aware that feminists are trying to "teach boys to cry more" because boys allegedly grow up to become emotional retards ("emotionally stunted" is the phrase I just heard by a feminist spamming the Melbourne Men's March Facebook page; perhaps "learning to control one's emotions" would be a more apt description?). I recall your suggesting that this will merely make their lives more difficult, because as soon as that voice breaks and the neoteny recedes so wil…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 04:28 PM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffusion_of_responsibility
/r/MensRights01/08/18 03:52 PM
5

Bravo! Good for you.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 03:51 PM
1

I don't disagree.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 03:22 PM
1

If there wan't a problem with the traditional family why would many women follow them? Because they can. People don't always do what's in their own best interests, especially when they are given incentives in the opposite direction. On the contrary people often do what feels right in the moment. Eating a candy bar instead of a carrot. Getting drunk instead of staying sober. Getting divorced and ruining the lives of your children by denying them access to their father etc. The question is whether…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 03:22 PM
7

This is getting beyond ridiculous. Men are dropping like flies from suicide and they devote newspaper space to this is the kind of princess and pea inanity? Feminist complaints make typical "first world problems" look like Greek fucking tragedies.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 12:14 PM
4

They do sometimes. There's a scene in the Red Pill where Paul Elam and a few others are holding a rally in Toronto. A bunch of SJW counter-protesters show up but they don't engage in any shenanigans. Even feminists have probably grown savvy enough to realize that attacking people speaking about men's rights is counter-productive to their cause. I wouldn't be surprised if they try to drown out the speakers with bullhorns or something though. That too will make them look like idiots, assuming the …
/r/MensRights01/08/18 11:53 AM
12

Pure cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 11:20 AM
3

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 11:20 AM
14

Awesome.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 11:17 AM
6

Do you really think any neutral parties will be reading the page? I'm actually not familiar with how Facebook works. If the answer is "yes" then I agree with you.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 11:15 AM
26

Feminists are already spamming the March page. Exhibit A: Did it ever cross your mind that social conditioning around traditional concepts of masculinity are significantly to blame for men's mental health issues, emotional stunting, and difficulty handling relationships? And that your anti-scientific notions that blame women for men's ills actually worsen the problem by adding fuel to the fire? Misogyny won't fix men's problems, it'll make them worse, by reinforcing the toxic, false ideas that m…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 11:06 AM
31

Looks like the next phase of the MRM has begun. It's about time. Godspeed Australia. If this is successful I think the next step should be to plan an INTERNATIONAL event where men and women around the world come together in different cities and protest for men's rights. I think we've reached the point where we can achieve impressive numbers given enough publicity and networking. The most important thing -- and it's unfortunate it has to be this way -- is that we have at least as many women in at…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 10:47 AM
58

Yep. Provided the speakers stick to Men's Rights issues and not play into their hands by turning it into a left vs. right political battle. Just talk about compassion for men and boys, cite the stats, and watch them stand there looking like the bigoted assholes they are.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 10:38 AM
21

Okay now it's ON, baby ;) Their campaigns seek to enforce rigid gender norms, sexist stereotypes and violence toward women. Are people really this fucking stupid? If they were motivated by sheer evil I might be able to muster up some grudging respect, given the power they wield; but it seems most of these twits are legitimately clueless. Like the idiots who protested screenings of the Red Pill without having even seen the movie. This could be a real landmark if Australian MRA's promote the hell …
/r/MensRights01/08/18 10:36 AM
8

Well aren't you a chivalrous guy. Nice to see that some gentlemen are still willing to stand up for m'ladies. Mentally ill men that are cross dressing entering a bathroom with young girls is indeed something to be concerned about. Girls are more likely to be abused by a female pedophile than a transwoman, who is clearly attracted to males (hence the sex change). However, I do understand your point, to a degree. It is simply ridiculous to have eg trans women competing with females in sports. You …
/r/MensRights01/08/18 09:03 AM
10

Feminists are disgusting people. I understand that a lot of the yungun's are just brainwashed gender studies students. But there is absolutely no excuse for the college professors and institutional leaders who censor the truth about "gender abuse". What makes it all the more sick and appalling is that violence against males by women (especially boys) often produces a blowback effect, causing male violence against females (eg between 55 to 80 percent of male rapists were sexually abused by women …
/r/MensRights01/08/18 08:53 AM
1

The Atlantic used to publish a lot of great articles, even pro-men's rights stuff by Christina Hoff Sommers. Seems like they're going down the feminist shitter too...
/r/MensRights01/08/18 08:48 AM
7

I've seen a lot of posts on this sub showing establishments where there is a woman's bathroom and a "gender neutral" bathroom. No men's room. If men aren't permitted privacy then women shouldn't have it either. Having said that, it's a little silly to worry about trans women. It's not like they're gonna rape you are something, they're interested in the "opposite" sex (the sex they were born).
/r/MensRights01/08/18 08:45 AM
5

Feminists (and tradcon women) oppose sex robots for the same reason they oppose porn, prostitution and grid girls. It has nothing to do with "objectification" or whatever other fancy sounding theory they come up with. It's simple economics. "The American psychology researcher Roy Baumeister of Florida State University has been advancing for some time now an interesting theory that analyzes the sexual act from an economic perspective. According to Baumeister, heterosexual sex can be understood as…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 07:57 AM
0

This doesn't qualify as an "answer." It's just clueless dumbassery. I'm much more disgusted by the ADL's recent attempt to conflate MRA's with "incels" and far right douche bags like Roosh V. Unfortunately they are given ammunition by an influx of far right posters on this sub. Part of me wonders whether they're sock puppets acting in some sort of coordinated effort. "Black propaganda" is a common technique used in counter-intelligence operations, and feminists have a buttload of money at their …
/r/MensRights01/08/18 07:33 AM
2

Unfortunately a lot of far right wing types have congregated on this sub over the last year or so. They're not really interested in men's rights, just promoting an alt-right agenda and attacking what they imagine is "the left." I wouldn't worry to much about their opinions. They don't represent the average MRA. Having said that, it seems like there's a lot of support for trans people in the dominant media and even at the state level, so I'm not sure why you care about the approval of MRA's. I me…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 07:25 AM
6

Feminists: we must treat women as strong and empowered! Also Feminists: we must treat women like children with no agency! Yeah, this isn't completely fucking insane at all...
/r/MensRights01/08/18 05:51 AM
25

What modern feminists want is to rid the world of traditional masculinity, pure and simple. I'm afraid it's not that simple. Feminists are positively enamored with traditional masculinity when it comes to men with power acting chivalrous toward women. Giving them all sorts of special treats and goodies, treating them like children in the criminal courts, protecting the honor of m'lady etc. Indeed feminists rely on "traditional masculinity" to a remarkable extent -- specifically the parts about p…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 04:38 AM
2

I definitely blame feminism for that because they've convinced girls that if they were even slightly tipsy they were raped or that they can withdraw consent the next day after a one night stand. Unfortunately it's not new thing, with or without the pseudo-justification by feminists. But feminists have certainly made the problem worse.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 04:30 AM
5

Did a search for the author's name. This woman is a reformed Canadian feminist. At minimum she appears to staunchly oppose third wave feminism and is writing some good articles on the subject. More here: http://www.ireneogrizek.com/
/r/MensRights01/08/18 04:26 AM
35

"Feminism teaches girls to be strong" lol. Yeah, because "strong" people need to be given artificial privileges in every aspect of life.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 03:26 AM
2

It is infantilizing to treat women as children in the criminal justice system. We must treat them as equals and give them the same punishments as men. It is sexist to assume women can't do dirty, dangerous jobs. We need state funding for programs to get more women working in fields like garbage collection, oil rig drilling, land mine detection etc. Girls are not inferior to boys; they don't need any special programs. Female-only spaces are sexist, they should be eliminated. The patriarchal idea …
/r/MensRights01/08/18 01:51 AM
2

Larry David and the Big Vagina
/r/MensRights01/08/18 12:58 AM
2

Well setting asside your revolution fantasies If you had any sense at all you'd agree with me. But in a way I don't blame you. If I spent a hundred years kicking a dog and he only let out a periodic whimper I too would be optimistic that he would never bear his fangs. But at the end of the day men and women will have to fix what feminists broke during their prolonged temper tantrum against reality. It can done the positive way -- by supporting MRA's and actual gender equality -- or it can be don…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 12:17 AM
5

Seriously. Feminists now control the most violent institution in the history of the world, and are trying to turn every single woman into her own little empress (if she merely feels a man wronged her in some way, a lot of really strong men with guns are gonna come after you). The increased physical strength of your average man is rather paltry in comparison. It's like a fucking ant vs. a T-Rex.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 12:05 AM
2

People have been claiming things that women are doing will cause major problems since at least 1558. So far the outcome hasn't been too bad. You can only whip a dog so long before it bites back. As Karen Straughan noted, men have been putting up with this abuse for over a hundred years -- in large because they have no interest in competing with or fighting against women, and also because feminists exploit the good nature of men -- but every man has his breaking point. Feminists literally have tw…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 11:56 PM
1

I just see it having any broad general impact. Wait awhile. We're only just getting started here. Well you would claim that wouldn't you. It's not a "claim" it's a fact.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 09:16 PM
11

This will only work if at least half the participants are women. And it could have a negative effect if the turmout is small. So if you're going to do it, promote the hell out of it.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 09:13 PM
8

Islam is a leftist religion LMAO. I am not going to waste time debating someone this ignorant.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 08:52 PM
2

You didn't address a single one of my arguments. We clearly know a very different set of men. While there do seem to be a subset of men online claiming to be very worried about #metoo they don't appear to make up a significant percentage of the general population. Heh. Just give it time. Men aren't idiots, and feminists have shown zero inclination that they intend to curtail, let alone reverse, their bizarre neo-puritanical crusade to micro-manage the sex lives of men and women -- placing all of…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 08:50 PM
1

Muslims near universally have a hatred of the jews Actually Muslims sheltered Jews at a time when Christians were persecuting them. There is a large Jewish population in Iran that evidently has no desire to moved to Israel. Animosity against Jews by Muslims owes mostly to the Zionist project. And I'm not just talking about the horrific treatment of Palestinians. Israeli scholar Israel Shahak notes that the Israeli strategic planning towards the Arab world is essentially genocidal, and involves b…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 08:36 PM
4

Chad Christ, let's not start using incel language on this forum.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 08:14 PM
3

The "one in four" figure includes things like an "unwanted kiss". That's retarded. When people hear the words "sexual assault" they think of a guy dragging some woman into an alley and raping her. Moreover, the (feminist) studies deliberately do not ask women whether they were "sexually assaulted"; they ask the subjects a series of questions that feminists then categorize as "assault", even when the subjects do not perceive it that way. I recall one study that even included "a sexist joke that m…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 08:12 PM
41

Articles like this almost invariably pretend that it's some great mystery as to why boys are falling behind. We already know the reason: Feminism. From another article on the subject: "In the 1970s, feminist critics regularly complained that the school system favored “male thinking.” Facts, dates, rote learning, and math skills that were seen as “too masculine” for girls. In the intervening decades, feminists have made huge strides throughout the Western world, and education – particularly in th…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 10:03 AM
17

Ironically most of these behaviors are disproportionately engaged in by women ("Repeatedly putting you down"? - no contest). However men seldom report their partners for domestic abuse. Basically another attempt by feminists to micro-manage human affairs via the state with the assumption that only men will suffer as a result.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 07:59 AM
232

Don't forget we also need to equalize the workplace death gap (95 percent male). And the consumer spending gap (women control about two-thirds of it). The health care spending gap. The social spending gap. The "granted custody of children" gap. The alimony gap. The prison sentencing gap. Etc. Etc. I'm sure feminists will tackle these gaps any second now...
/r/MensRights31/07/18 06:08 AM
10

equity They have done no such thing. They seek equity or supremacy in positions of power and prestige; and they seek supremacy everywhere else (education, legal rights, custody rights, social spending, health care spending, etc. etc.). You won't find feminists arguing for "equity" or "equality of outcome" in areas where men and boys are behind. Moreover this is consistent with the entire history of feminism, even during the first wave, when Earnest Befort Bax wrote, "Feminism means unlimited lic…
/r/MensRights31/07/18 02:26 AM
43

A "rape culture" would entail tolerance or even encouragement of rape by the broader society (eg the way men and boys are treated when the perp is female). That doesn't exist in India, at least not on a large scale. India actually has one of the biggest men's rights movements in the world. They are horribly mistreated in many areas of law. There is also an epidemic of false rape accusations, designed basically as cash grabs.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 01:19 AM
15

If we count things like "emotional abuse" or "controlling behavior" it's probably more like 1 in 2. On the other hand we shouldn't fall into the feminist trap of characterizing every behavior in the most alarmist and extreme manner.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 01:15 AM
2

'cause he's a hypocritical simpering mangina? (and painfully unfunny to boot, unless you think smug snarkiness is hilarious). I was gonna say "feminist" but a lot of tradcon men take basically the same approach.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 01:11 AM
13

I gotta tella ya, the patriarchy is doing a really shitty job of oppressing women. Men on the other hand....
/r/MensRights30/07/18 11:29 PM
13

This is blatant, institutionalized misandry. Anyone who claims feminism has something to do with "gender equality" should be openly mocked. The incredible thing about this is that women are already given massive privileges in the criminal "justice" system. I don't have a link handy, but one study determined that if women were treated like men by the courts, about half of UK prisoners would be female. And it didn't even take into account arrest rates or the fact that most men do not report domest…
/r/MensRights30/07/18 11:28 PM
27

Sorry, but "satirical" man-hating literature by feminists is similar to "satirical" anti-Jew literature by anti-Semites. Moreover the text doesn't read as satire at all. What is most remarkable about Solanas is that she received substantial support from the "mainstream" feminist movement. NOW almost split over the controversy, Gender Studies founder Sally Gearhart agreed that males should be reduced to ten percent of the population, and Germaine Greer actually repeated one of Solanas' arguments …
/r/MensRights30/07/18 10:59 PM
5

Among other things Karen discusses how highlighting the plight of women and children helped to achieve labor rights for (mostly) men during the early 20th century. Another interesting event from the time period not mentioned in the lecture: the Ludlow massacre, in which a dozen or so wives and children of coal miners were slaughtered by guardsmen working for the Rockefellers. This event caused about 1000x more national outrage than the previous several decades of men being slaughtered en masse i…
/r/MensRights30/07/18 09:41 PM
1

https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=verbal&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all
/r/MensRights30/07/18 08:53 PM
2

The claim women are superior at X was a first and 2nd wave thing. Are you kidding? I constantly hear feminist make blatant appeals to female superiority. And not just twits on tumblr, I'm talking bout powerful women. Eg Hillary Clinton: "I just think women in general are better listeners, are more collegial, more open to new ideas and how to make thing work in a way that looks for win-win outcomes." (Hillary also shares the female supremacist view that female privilege should be expanded, not el…
/r/MensRights30/07/18 08:52 PM
3

Great article by Hannah. He went on to point out that the spirit of masculinity manifests in men, when tested, striving to make things safer and easier for the next person crafting what is needed to achieve that, mean our ancestors are in everything we have, from old laws to tools and structures we use to protect ourselves from the horrors they faced, and from which they learned. Feminism, he said, “wears those masculine gifts like a robo-suit, using gifts of masculinity to wage war on men.” His…
/r/MensRights29/07/18 11:19 PM
24

Actually the popular feminist slogan "the future is female" was coined by a feminist named Sally Miller Gearhart, who advocated exactly that: reduce males to ten percent of the population (I don't think she thought things through; women would end up competing for said ten percent of men). Gearhart founded the first gender studies class. Now consider that in some countries gender studies receives government funding, paid for by mostly male tax payers. It would be like black people being forced to…
/r/MensRights29/07/18 10:56 PM
14

It was about an old case, where a 14 year old girl was allegedly raped, then flagged a random car for help, and the driver of the car also raped her. I find that absurdly implausible.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 10:28 PM
5

There are an increasing number of posters here who are concerned less with men's rights than pushing a far right agenda. To characterize anyone left of Genghis Khan as a "communist" is idiotic, and betrays an ignorance of basic political and economic theory (there are plenty of anti-authoritarian leftists, for example). It's also noteworthy that virtually all of the best MRA texts were written by people who are left of center (eg Earnest Bax, Warren Farrell, David Benetar, Paul Nathanson, Kather…
/r/MensRights29/07/18 09:23 PM
1

Wut. Are you retarded?
/r/MensRights29/07/18 07:32 AM
1

She's very fond of boys; as in boys rather than men.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 06:52 AM
3

Example?
/r/MensRights29/07/18 06:44 AM
1

Thanks, I'll look into it.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 03:19 AM
1

lol. Feminists are trying to change the definition of "rape" to include not asking verbal permission for every escalation of a sexual encounter. That turns every man into a rapist. Feminists think it's right and just that men have their lives destroyed with no presumption of innocence or due process under "MeToo" -- even when the behavior amounts to a clumsy come-on or boorish remark. You'll forgive me staying far, far the hell away from that minefield. All sane men will eventually do the same, …
/r/MensRights29/07/18 01:57 AM
3

I explained why citing specific positive qualities as masculine is difficult for feminists. And yet they have no problem whatsoever claiming that women are superior at X, Y and Z. That women are more cooperative, empathetic, nurturing; that if women ruled the world there would be no more wars etc. They vacillate between claiming the sexes are identical and claiming women are superior. This was evident in the first wave. Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote that women are "infinitely superior" to men. It…
/r/MensRights29/07/18 01:38 AM
2

Why? What exactly would that achieve, if such a quote were to be provided? It would prove that feminists aren't an anti-male hate cult for one; it would demonstrate that they are capable of coming to grips with observable reality and biology, for two; and for three it would provide men and boys with some much needed respect and appreciation in an age where they are relentlessly demonized in the corporate media and every other major institution. Best method might be to get yourself a feminist GF …
/r/MensRights29/07/18 01:17 AM
2

Heh.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 01:13 AM
2

I stated in OP that I'm not interested in feminists claiming they are somehow going to "help" men and boys (even as they relentlessly attack them) overcome their "toxic masculinity" etc. Try again.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 11:26 PM
1

So again, the answer is no? Saying "Men aren't all evil" doesn't count.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 11:12 PM
3

So...no then? I'm looking for a quote by a prominent feminist saying something positive about men and masculinity.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 11:11 PM
4

You misunderstood. I'm not talking about feminists who claim they want to help men (they don't), or rescue them from "toxic masculinity" etc. I'm talking about feminists who acknowledge that there are positive things about men and masculinity. An example of what I'm talking about can be found in the work of social scientist Roy Baumesiter, author of "Is there anything good about men?" He draws attention to the positive attributes of men and masculinity. So for example we could say that "men are …
/r/MensRights28/07/18 08:51 PM
24

Schopenhauer called the post-orgasm moment of clarity as "devil's laughter" because it's when we realize we're slaves to a biological imperative uncaring of our happiness.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 08:36 PM
1

Yeah, pretty sure it did.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 02:29 AM
3

I'm not sure how it works in Argentina, but legal systems up here entail punishments if you lose, if only the money you wasted. ;)
/r/MensRights28/07/18 01:54 AM
3

Also, the reason most cases don't go to court is because lawyers honestly tell men they don't have a fucking prayer. Rich men can afford expensive lawyers. So congrats again feminists on separating fathers from their children, and children from their fathers. It's not like it makes a profound difference or anything.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 01:31 AM
9

I'm saying they didn't need to destroy one of the last few boys-only organizations. If they thought girl scouts was too girly (How horrible, being a girl? -- that seems to be what they're implying), then add an optional category of doing the more traditionally boyish stuff. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 12:45 AM
12

So expand girl scouts. Why not do that? Offer them new options from the boy scouts catalogue.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 12:36 AM
3

they should check the specific case and resolve the situation case by case, always having the interest of the child on highest ground. Joint custody should be the default position, and should only be changed if one parent is deemed unfit. Again, feminists have blocked every single attempt to make joint custody the law. Not just in the 70's but every time since then. It is the official position of NOW. The "best interests of the child" doctrine is constantly violated, because as mentioned, study …
/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:34 PM
2

Sure, I'm just saying that reform of judicial system is a major issue we all agree it should happen. Great. I look forward to numerous posts on MensLib about the subject. I totally disagree with putting it into context of the system of punishment that the judicial system is. We agree again. Too bad feminists with actual power don't share your opinion. False, send me an example. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=verbal+consent&restrict_sr=on Totally false. Teacchers, specifically eleme…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 10:59 PM
7

Which frankly is a leftist issue in US, because black men specifically are specially targeted. No. Men are specifically targeted. The racial sentencing gap is minor compared to the six times larger gender sentencing gap (which feminists want to expand). Black women are treated much more leniently by the criminal justice system than white men. Couples have a lots of agreement already into their lifestyle and their communication is far more attuned. That's irrelevant. We're talking about the law h…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 10:16 PM
3

I think it's an interesting experiment. There are probably a lot of ignorant people out there who think feminism is simply a movement for "gender equality" rather than a virulently anti-male hate cult (granted these delusions are becoming increasingly difficult to maintain now that feminists have infiltrated most of society's institutions). It would probably surprise the average "coffee shop" feminist to learn that no feminist of any repute has ever said anything positive about men.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 09:21 PM
12

Have you had any posts demanding women be treated like adults in the criminal justice system? ----->We support a justice reform that is more lenient on men, instead of more harsh on women. As do I. However, do you extend that to eg female serial killers and female psychopaths who torture children? Have you guys discussed the current feminist fad, expressed in august publications like the Washington Post, arguing that female prisons should be eliminated entirely? Are you aware that feminists in t…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 08:58 PM
3

Women are supposed to settle and take care of kids, and the home Not anymore they're not. Young women who choose that path are often maligned by feminists. And if viewed historically, that's a pretty small sacrifice compared to being forced to fight and die in some war before you even reach legal drinking age.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 08:00 PM
176

Feminists have already done a great deal for boys. They have created untold numbers of damaged men (and women, for that matter) by denying boys contact with their fathers (via eg the Duluth model, denying the existence of false accusations in family court, blocking alimony reform, blocking shared parenting legislation etc). They have portrayed domestic violence as a patriarchal conspiracy, which has allowed countless mothers to get away with abusing boys (and girls). They "reformed" the educatio…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:49 PM
3

I love the pic of the guy on the ad with a big grin saying "at last!"
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:35 PM
19

I dont consider feminism the opposition. Read this. MRA's didn't pick a fight with feminists just for the hell of it. They block equal rights legislation at every turn, constantly lie about us in the media, and literally try to shut down MRA meetings on things like male suicide.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:31 PM
27

I beg to differ The modern-day "father" of the Men's Rights Movement is Warren Farrell. He used to a hardcore feminist and was even president of the National Organization of Women at one point. Many MRA's used to be feminists -- until they realized that feminism is an anti-male hate movement. We have tried, over the course of many years, to work with feminists. But they literally oppose equal rights. I am an anti-feminist precisely because I support gender equality.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:28 PM
2

There is a saying that there is a fine line between genius and insanity. Yeah this is an oft-overlooked looked point. Geniuses rarely have normal, happy lives. Many suffer from all sorts of mental problems. It's not necessarily something to envy.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:08 PM
15

I actually agree with you here. There are way too many posts on this sub blaming "leftists" for all society's problems. Having said that, Hillary is about as left wing as Auguste Pinochet.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:51 PM
23

Have you had any posts demanding women be treated like adults in the criminal justice system? Do you guys support quota systems? -- which suggest that women are too weak to achieve things on their own even though they already make up the majority of university students? Do you support "enthusiastic consent", which places all of the responsibility on the man and turns women into weak little vegetables who aren't even capable of saying "no"? Do you have posts demanding that female teachers stop gi…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:50 PM
21

Actually MensLib is much more conservative than this sub. You guys ape traditional gender roles really well (women are all victims and lack agency; men must protect and serve them), minus the "respect and fairness for men and boys" part. Politically speaking, yeah there are plenty of right wingers here, but there are also plenty of leftists and even socialists.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:30 PM
43

The philosophy of men's lib is pretty simple, and accords perfectly with feminist theology. Women have problem ---> caused by men. Men have problem ----> also caused by men. Women have problem ----> men must fix it. Men have problem ------> men must also fix it. They even extend this bizarre philosophy to boys who are being raised entirely by females. It seems counter-intuitive but MensLib actually embraces traditional gender roles to a remarkable degree. Women are morally superior and pure but …
/r/MensRights27/07/18 05:24 PM
4

No one said anything about anyone being "inherently superior." Ted Bundy had an IQ of 150; are you suggesting he was superior than everyone who has Downs syndrome? And you also seemed to have missed the part about men also being more likely to have very low intelligence. Typical feminist: you only look at the apex and ignore the bottom. Reminds me of feminists complaining about the "glass ceiling" while ignoring the "glass cellar". Edit: and regarding socialization (and nutrition). I never claim…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 04:54 PM
10

Actually it's significant, because when you reach the extreme high end of intelligence it's basically all men. That's why there is no female Mozart and why the Nobel Prize list looks as it does. If we don't acknowledge the hard truth, feminists will claim that the above is due to "sexual discrimination" against women. No. It's just biology. Edit: at the extreme high end of intelligence, the ratio is 236 men to 1 woman. That's according to scientist Helena Cronin. You can view her speech on the s…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 04:35 PM
1

They don't have ads. They don't need them. There are some very deep pockets behind that organization.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 10:39 AM
1

It's the ADL, they don't give a shit about clicks. They get (lavish) funding from wealthy donors.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 10:21 AM
7

Edit: people shouldn't downvote OP because he linked to a hitpiece. It's not like anyone here agrees with it. We should know what our enemies are saying about us. Wow. This is probably the most egregious hitpiece I've ever seen against the men's rights movement, and that's saying something. It is 100 percent bald-faced lies. This should be upvoted for visibility. The ADL, like the SPLC, is still considered a respectable organization by some people. This article reveals that it is strictly a prop…
/r/MensRights27/07/18 08:42 AM
13

So to summarize: women are more likely to initiate unilateral abuse against their husbands. women are more likely to engage in controlling behavior. women are more likely to use relational aggression lesbians have the highest rates of domestic violence, while gays have the lowest. women are more likely to use false allegations of abuse, which is an extreme form of proxy violence women are more likely to abuse and kill their children boys are more likely to be abused than girls children who are a…
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:58 PM
15

There is one additional group: men who have been lied to since infancy and never exposed to alternate sources of information. The "education" system is almost 100 percent gynocentric. It is increasingly difficult to use this as a defense, however, since the misandry is fucking everywhere now.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 01:54 AM
3

Do they invite journalists? It seems like the more journalists you have present the more likely you are to get some fair and semi-fair articles in addition to the feminist lies.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 01:01 AM
2

Strippers and prostitutes are a hate crime against women? So I guess that means hen parties, chippendales dancers and male escorts are a hate crime against men? This is completely absurd. We all know what's really going on here: unattractive women are jealous of attractive women. women who are too "easy" reduce the sexual bargaining power of women as a whole it pains feminists when women give men pleasure of any kind, sexual or otherwise. Funny how tradcons and feminists (minus an impotent minor…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 10:01 PM
3

When I say "valued for their wombs" and I didn't mean something that happens consciously. It happens on an instinctual level. Neoteny is another factor. And yes I agree with you that men genuinely love women and want to protect them. Unfortunately women seem to have a much harder time empathizing with the opposite sex.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 09:44 PM
1

I'm not talking about a movie. I'm talking about the statistics from the Titanic. More than that, I'm talking about DNA studies from all of civilized history: during every time period and every country, females were significantly more likely to survive to adulthood and reproduce.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 09:41 PM
3

Yes I understand and agree. I think "victim" suffices. I mean we don't even call torture victims or people who have had their legs blown off in war "survivors". Being a sexual assault victim is terrible but I just don't see how using that word is helpful.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 06:44 AM
10

We shouldn't call sexual assault victims "survivors". It creates the impression that the trauma is too difficult to overcome, and that being a victim is how you should define yourself. I also find it troubling that the term is often used for people whose allegations are unproven or even highly dubious (eg the "rape survivor" Emma Sulkowitz). In feminist circles, it almost seems to function as a sort of status symbol: "I'm a sexual assault survivor so I have authority that you don't." Apart from …
/r/MensRights25/07/18 06:17 AM
6

There is a fundamental difference between the typical male and female rape joke. When we make a joke about a woman or child being raped the humor derives from the fact that we find the act so appalling. When we joke about a male prisoner being raped the "humor" derives from the fact that we think he deserves it. You can see this on any given cop show when the detective taunts the evil male suspect about how the prisoners are gonna "just love him" etc. So, ironically, MRA's could well make the ar…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 05:30 AM
3

This is a really egregious case.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 05:24 AM
4

men with money are valued more, just like beautiful women are valued more. The Men with money are valued more than women? No, that's not true. Eg on the Titanic rich men were more likely to perish than poor women. Or look at MeToo: we have no problem destroying the lives of rich men over a mere accusation of impropriety by a woman. And average men don't "value" rich men more than themselves. Women certainly do. That's why men get rich in the first place. I'll concede your argument if we're talki…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:19 AM
14

Uhhhh, like engineering, medicine(doctors, not nurses), laboratory research, banking and wall street, automotive, filmmaking, business management and whatever else lol? Show me some evidence that men are in any way "privileged" in said fields. You won't find it. Indeed a recent study showed that in tech fields there is a two to one hiring preference for women. Women are less likely to work difficult and demanding jobs, this is true. They don't have to because men don't sexually select for wealth…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:12 AM
11

Oddly, women never have to say "not all women" when the daily "women kills her child" story hits the papers.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 03:09 AM
5

No, you're not taking crazy pills. A lot of these feminist men seem to have had a difficult time bonding with other males while growing up. They extrapolate their unusual (lack of) experience to all males. Gender based shaming comes primarily from women. What Brown also discovered in the course of her research is that, contrary to her early assumptions, men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 03:05 AM
26

Many men perceive women's worth in their beauty, or lack thereof. Nah. When the ship sinks they don't say "beautiful women and children first! Ugly chicks -- you stay behind with the men!" All women are valued. It's true that beautiful women are even more privileged, though.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 01:47 AM
27

There are still way more successful men than women And? There are also way more homeless men than women and way more men in prison. The fact that men are still able to succeed when every major institution favors the opposite sex is remarkable, admittedly (not including males born into wealth, as they have their own set of privileges).
/r/MensRights25/07/18 01:24 AM
53

Sorry, she has to own her misandry, as does the disgusting bitch who penned the article. If a man was doing the same and dismissing women as "useless" if they weren't super attractive we would rightly call that man a piece of shit. Feminists have a really bad habit of engaging in appalling hate speech then claiming they were only being "ironic". It would be like if a member of the KKK said "black people are useless monkeys", then followed up with "relax bro, I was just joking." That dog don't hu…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 12:42 AM
39

John Keats. Christopher Marlowe. Percy Shelley. The list is endless. Of course by citing great men who died young we're sort of playing into her argument. A man should not have to achieve greatness or earn great wealth to be considered a valuable human being. The true heroes of society are average working men who keep civilization functioning, often risking their lives to do so. This spoiled bitch Lopez wouldn't last ten minutes if all of these men decided to take a day off. It's funny that wome…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 12:36 AM
420

Women are human beings, men are human doings. If a man doesn't provide some utility to "society" (meaning women and children) then he is indeed considered useless. Worse than useless, in fact, a burden. Women are valued simply for existing due to their wombs. Men have to prove their value. This basically explains the entire history of gender relations and "patriarchy." What feminists have done is unbelievably selfish, when you really think about it. In addition to maintaining all of women's trad…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 11:14 PM
11

MIght be able to find something like that on r/menkampf
/r/MensRights24/07/18 11:03 PM
4

When feminists abuse men using the term "fragile masculinity" they unwittingly reveal something profound: men are disposable. Men have to prove their utility and worth, women have de facto worth. Feminists don't understand this, however; they assume that men are highly protective of their honor and sense of worth and masculinity just for the hell of it. No. The simple truth is that women despise weak men. This, again, is what the research shows. "What Brown also discovered in the course of her r…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:32 PM
2

Why not perform a social experiment? Ask ten men whether they are appreciate some obnoxious woman calling them "fragile." It's an awful, abusive term, designed specifically to degrade men. If you can't see this I don't know what else to say.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 09:56 PM
4

You can't speak this broadly about feminism and be taken seriously in any academic or intellectual context. I don't consider gender studies a serious discipline. It's more akin to astrology. The only reason feminists haven't been booted out of academia -- as they should have long ago -- is because of what feminists themselves call "benevolent sexism" (a euphemism for female privilege). you're dismissing the movement's focus on making things better for men by men lol. Feminists don't want to help…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 09:45 PM
5

Regular guys in their 20s and 30s still feel some pressure to be stoic, rugged, and other traits associated with hegemonically masculine guys with little room for things society society considers feminine. First of all, don't use terms like "hegemonic masculinity". It makes you sound retarded. Secondly, if men weren't "stoic" society would collapse. Men perform about 99 percent of the dangerous jobs that keep civilization running. Should men be allowed to be more feminine if they want? Sure. Go …
/r/MensRights24/07/18 08:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter