TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

not_quite_so_random Archive

View 1 post and 56 comments by not_quite_so_random on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
64

Humournot_quite_so_random/r/MensRights08/03/23 01:08 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

No and no. If there had been risk of serious injury with the choking it would have been mentioned. And you still haven't understood what you're even arguing against: that a similar story to the OP couldn't happen with the genders (plural) reversed.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 02:01 PM
11

Your priorities may differ, but I consider protecting a young child as more important than protecting a grown ass hibristophiliac. And the severity of a little bruising doesn't really compare with almost losing an eye. That's not to say he shouldn't be behind bars, all three attackers in question should.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:45 PM
19

Try reading the original comment you responded to again. having a young child A child that's likely either going to become a victim to or inherit the mother's low moral character and violent inclinations, possibly both. If it takes this little for her to fly off the handle, what's she going to do to a child throwing a tantrum?
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:34 PM
27

In example 1 the female victim explicitly forgave her attacker, the other vic was male. In example 2 it was a man who was attacked. When you find a case of a man being mildly insulted by a woman, with her removing herself from the scene and him then assaulting her once she returns, leaving her with lacerations being let go, lmk.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:13 PM
6

I agree with the sentiment, but you're forgetting that to many of those legislators and lobbyists protecting .ale victims IS an "undesired side-effect"
/r/MensRights08/02/24 02:55 PM
24

The duluth model disagrees
/r/MensRights14/01/24 09:23 AM
21

But didn't mention carrying the child to term or raising said child. Both getting an abortion and getting a fake pregnancy test are easy compared to fighting throughout an entire war.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 01:18 PM
19

Dr Proudman said barristers had told her she should be reprimanded by the board - something which she finds “threatening” and makes her feel like her “workspace has become quite dangerous to be in”. In response to which she reported all of them to the board and is upset they didn't all get outright disbarred. What a clown.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 11:40 AM
7

https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/arti Here's one, I'm sure there were several others showing a higher rate of ssa among men too. Edit: And you'll wanna have a look at this https://www.reddit.com/r/MRRef/s/LvJpfB7Jwe
/r/MensRights20/10/23 07:35 AM
7

Amazing how you manage to be annoyed by posts about dating but at the same time you don't seem to ever even glanced at one. And you're also trying to portray a larger trend as the actions of a single individual, utterly divorced from larger society. But to humour you and answer your question which misrepresents the entire issue: Same as with any other person, male or female, me dating my dream woman after she fell in love with me for no discernable reason, despite her being way out of my league …
/r/MensRights15/09/23 12:27 PM
7

It should be nothing less than obvious from the context, but I'm referencing intersexual inequality, not intrasexual.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 12:04 PM
8

You're making me repeat myself. Any change in anti-male laws, which are in some way related to sex meaning, MGM, rape, sexual harassment, divorce, child support and probably some I'm forgetting now will be utterly impossible without some semblance of equality within the dating scene. And the fact that the dating scene has shifted means that yes, it is indeed influenced by the larger culture around it just in case you want to pull some biological essentialism argument next. Let me try to put it a…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 11:43 AM
8

Gee, who would dare to think that sexual relationships could have something to do with the relationship between the sexes. Quips aside, unequal laws don't just materialize out of nowhere, they stem from cultural views. This shouldn't need explaining but this goes double for legislature in a democratic system. But the very notion of changing culture is apparently heretical in your eyes. Ironically enough you mention unequal rape laws, well they're a DIRECT consequence of inequality in the sexual …
/r/MensRights15/09/23 11:18 AM
25

90% of homicide victims in mexico are male.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 06:23 PM
11

It doesn't have to be mutually exclusive like that. Both groups' misandry just manifests in slightly different ways.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 10:13 AM
7

These findings go some way towards debunking the narrative that "Women just live longer." Instead they suggest what many here probably already suspect: that people with easier lives live longer and women live easier lives than men.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 12:34 PM
1

https://archive.ph/VTKOX Archived Link I spent way too long sifting through this piece of verbal diarrhea, trying to find anything resembling a coherent argument and mostly finding delusion stacked on top of impossible-to-meet demands. But before that, here's an unintentional nugget from early on: women are people. They are complex beings like everybody else Who's "everybody else" in this sentence? It'd have to be men, but she apparently cannot bring herself to write that men are human beings...…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 01:51 PM
13

Oh I'm very much in favour of spreading awareness around breast cancer. You could even say I'm actively supporting them by suggesting they should advocate for mandatory paternity tests. More than you're doing, certainly.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 09:30 AM
16

To be fair, the organization indeed doesn't explicitly describe itself as feminist, but a Women's Health Org. If you want to describe that group as fully distinct and separate from feminism,possibly even opposed to feminism, I won't stop you. In fact I'd invite you to take that opinion and proudly present it in feminist forums, see how they react.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 09:24 AM
42

Wow, feminists accidentally making the case for mandatory paternity tests!
/r/MensRights09/05/23 08:54 AM
1

As I touched on before, assuming fat men to be unattractive (to women) MAY (extra emphasis on the may as I am in fact not a mind reader) be a flawed assumption on our part. This ofc also extends to the self image of these overweight guys. Again, as icecorrect mentioned, overweight guys are, or are perceived as stronger and women tend to look for perceived strength in a partner. Though I guess women being more vocal about that could be considered a win for men and I didn't come here to spread neg…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 12:56 PM
2

The idea that larger men are generally attractive to women and that this includes fat men. Icecorrect also made a comment to that effect, but dressed it up in prettier words and justifications. To elaborate, I don't see this as a huge win, because if there is merit to that hypothesis, this would just be an example of women gushing over a conventionally attractive man. I would find people praising a short and/or skinny man or the like more encouraging. Granted, I may just be too pessimistic... Al…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 12:27 PM
1

Point to the lardmaxxers, I guess?
/r/MensRights05/05/23 11:11 AM
11

Yeah, your post certainly puts mine to shame, but recognizing the inequality and hypocrisy seems like an important first step. So I went with the more basic option of pointing it out.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 02:11 PM
18

Really the threshold in this analogy should be even lower: "if she was only slightly wet, she wanted it"
/r/MensRights25/02/23 07:25 PM
9

I don't control men's standards What a cop out. The scales are woefully unbalanced, if they weren't this would be a different conversation. leading/guiding his coworkers to success in a positive way What you're describing so quickly and vaguely means ACTUALLY putting in the effort, ACTUALLY having a position of power, ACTUALLY knowing the strengths and weaknesses of everyone involved and ACTUALLY knowing the best way to leverage them. Which a) Women are just as capable of if they have the requir…
/r/MensRights24/02/23 03:42 PM
12

My point being that only a small percentage of men can pull it off and not for lack of effort. Meanwhile female beauty standards are low enough for the vast majority of healthy young and youngish women to benefit from there sexuality. A small, scrawny man throwing a squeaky temper tantrum isn't perceived as any better tha "bitchy" women, probably worse in today's climate. So he's not able to use "masculine aggression" or whatever for his benefit.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 03:26 PM
19

Ah, the old "Just literally be a greek demigod, bro!" Gets them every time
/r/MensRights24/02/23 03:18 PM
16

Just so everyone's aware, you're talking about a telephone survey from 1994-1996 with questions designed to exclude female perpetrators.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 03:09 PM
8

If a man got into a relationship with a violent woman, you wouldn't expect random women to jump in and save him. It's that double standard which is the catalyst for this post.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 10:13 AM
4

The post clearly identifies the problem as the innocent men disregarding his own well-being in an attempt to a woman he didn't know.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 10:06 AM
1

Exactly the point of the post, so why are you complaining?
/r/MensRights18/11/21 09:56 AM
23

Why do you get uncomfortable? How would a man in an elevator with 3 women not get uncomfortable?
/r/MensRights14/11/21 02:17 PM
17

Then spell it out for me: What happens if a woman gets into an elevator with 3 men?
/r/MensRights14/11/21 02:14 PM
17

Notice how I use "IF he WERE". For your scenario to be a problem, you'd have to assume that the average woman has as much disdain for men as a raging homophobe has for gays.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 02:12 PM
26

No, I'm pointing out that YOU trust men so little.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 02:08 PM
26

Let's take your elevator example. We can actually simulate this by taking a scrawny guy and putting him in an elevator with 3 muscular men that all wear "Proud to be gay" signs. But if he were to throw a paranoid fit you'd rightly call him a homophobic bigot, wouldn't you?
/r/MensRights14/11/21 02:05 PM
3

Womens' and mens' rights are indeed compatible. You'll be hard pressed to find an MRA who argues for restricting womens' rights, but you'll find plenty of feminists who want to restrict the rights of men and their supposedly moderate fellows will rarely if ever call them out. And the feminist movement is fully capable of calling out what they dislike, as you can see with their treatment of TE(R)Fs.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 04:43 PM
3

My old biology teacher gleefully told the class that the y-chromosome is a crippled x-chromosome. Feminists also don't want women crawling in the muddy trenches, or in nameless mass graves, they want them in cushy officer positions far from any danger. I don't think viagra and birth control make for an adequate comparison, but if you insist, it's an example of womens' safety taking priority. Same with drug testing. "Gynocentrism hurts women too" I highly doubt that doctors have a policy of "No t…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 04:17 PM
5

If you're talking about hypertraditionalist societies, yes men typically enjoy more freedom and women more safety in those. But looking at the western world, women are just as protected while enjoying the same or more freedoms than men.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 03:43 PM
5

Prioritizing womens' well being over mens', tolerating abuse against men while harshly punishing abuse against women. Things like that. The actions of feminist lawmakers, scholars and activists matter more than your personal sensibilities. The Duluth model actively harms male victims of abuse, as it is designed to do. It's not "Nothing"
/r/MensRights23/09/21 03:30 PM
5

The fact that society is gynocentric despite men being in positions of power is merely a result of the gynocentrism of both genders, aka women and men both have a bias in favor of women. Blindly putting more women in positions of power without widely acknowledging and condemning this bias will only exacerbate these issues. Most people, including most feminists view patriarchy as a system which unilaterally advantages men over women and those that are aware of the definition you use typically swi…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 02:32 PM
5

Even if we were to assume that men almost exclusively engage in physical violence and women in psychological violence, that doesn't change how victims are treated based on gender. A male victim of physical violence is business as usual, a female victim of physical violence is a horrible tragedy. A male victim of psychological violence is the object of mockery, a female victim is, giving you the maximum benefit of the doubt, business as usual again. You are also talking about a society which sees…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 01:12 PM
4

INTP, but a poll may be a better option for this question...
/r/MensRights07/08/21 04:05 PM
6

By having men protect and provide for women.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 11:15 AM
6

Believing someone to be incapable, but affording them all the care you can isn't hate. Think of overprotective parents, their behaviour may very well be damaging to their child, but they don't do it out of hate and a desire to inflict suffering.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 11:00 AM
6

You'll notice that putting these restrictions on women often comes with a very similar assertion that they are simply incapable of doing these things. How do you maximize the protection a group of people receives? You make the rest believe that the group is worthy of protection as well as incapable if protecting themselves. The notion of giving children a baseline education and having them then choose their own path is a relatively recent development, throughout much of history children were usu…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 10:42 AM
9

Almost all of these things apply to children as well. So does humanity hate children? Or does humanity value the well-being of children, occasionally to the point of restricting their freedoms?
/r/MensRights31/07/21 10:30 AM
12

Feminism isn't some invisible boogeyman, it's a clear and present ideology and movement. It's like calling any given religion invisible and irrelevant in a nominally secular nation. The individual politicians should obviously be voted out of office as well, but there's feminist organizations collecting money to bankroll these politicians, paying for ads on billboards and TV, helping these people get elected.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 01:02 PM
10

Many politicians are either fully feminist or adhere to key feminist ideas. So in order for society to hold these politicians accountable, feminism needs to be discredited. In your version of events, in which feminism is still regarded as the essence of everything good, the lone champion of equality and fairness, people will confront a politician, pointing out what policies they dislike and the politician will shrug, say "Hey, I'm just doing what the feminists told me" and the critics will have …
/r/MensRights08/07/21 12:31 PM
14

So you're arguing that more politicians should openly oppose feminist legislation. I agree.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 12:20 PM
15

Feminist politicians implement a model developed by feminist scholars, adhering to feminist dogma and with support from feminist voters, but somehow "feminism isn't to blame, politicians are" How does that begin to make sense?
/r/MensRights08/07/21 12:12 PM
14

The implementation of the duluth model in several nations is just one that comes to mind
/r/MensRights08/07/21 11:53 AM
21

Firstly, feminism doesn't have a monopoly on women's rights and thus using the two terms interchangeably is either misguided or disingenuous. Secondly, the fact that you seem to put the responsibility to unite both women's and men's rights on the rather small and niche men's rights movement, rather than on women's rights movements and feminism, which command billions of dollars to me speaks volumes on your intentions. Thirdly, a good chunk of the inequalities faced by men today are created speci…
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:21 AM
11

Seems to me like men are just more willing to engage in a relationship at all, the curves look almost similar. If your hypothesis was correct, the female graph would have to eclipse the male one for the lower body counts.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 06:21 AM
2

I disagree. It's judging a man purely by how women subjectively value him, irrespective of his actual value or the quality of his character. And feminists LOVE to use this exact kind of insults against men, so I doubt they call it toxic masculinity consistently.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 09:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter