TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

notcaptainkirk Archive

View 0 posts and 263 comments by notcaptainkirk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

For the record, men telling girls what to do is patriarchy at it's worst, nothing but shitlords, but women telling boys what to do is THE RIGHT THING.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:47 AM
45

Indeed. I fail to see how the "patriarchy" benefits the father of 5 working at McDonalds. But if someone would be as so kind as to educate me...
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:17 PM
7

Ah, yes, college. You're a complete failure if you don't spend at least $50k there.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:02 AM
3

How about I save people a bunch of time and a bunch of anger and say this: Vice.com will say literally anything for page views.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:00 AM
5

If I get a ball, it's mine. And that's fine. But the guy in the story WANTED to give the kid the game ball. That's fine, too.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:37 PM
2

small acts of kindness can have such a huge impact on our fellow humans
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:35 PM
8

Any time I hear someone talking about being alpha, I know they are definitely not alpha.
/r/seduction03/08/13 07:37 AM
7

It's funny because the wallet is talking. When will the wallet learn its place?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:27 PM
38

In fact, Ms. Doucet repeatedly told police, and then a psychologist, that she hadn’t been brutalized by Mr. Ryan at all, and refused the offer of a protection order when the RCMP offered it. That's all that needs to be read here.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:22 PM
43

The most disturbing part about the connection between rape, alcohol and consent is that it's only rape if a man does it. Which is why all the people talking about "rape culture" can kiss my ass. If I get drunk and a sober woman has sex with me, it's either as much of a rape as if our sexes were reversed or it isn't. The fact I am a man SHOULD HAVE NO BEARING. Which is NOT the legal situation currently.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 06:10 AM
1

No one is denying that women and men are paid differently. What people are denying is that women are paid less BECAUSE they are women. They are paid less because, on average, they work less and have less dangerous jobs, among other things.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 03:31 PM
5

Wait a second. You guys are posting almost every single day that there is no pay gap and its just a myth. There is a gap between what women and men are paid There is NO gap between what women and men are paid FOR THE SAME WORK
/r/MensRights03/07/13 07:18 AM
8

he was also regarded as being sexist. Don't you see, anything said about women in any manner is sexism. But in all seriousness, that is just sad. I feel for the kid. And in Canada, no less. I'm embarrassed.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:30 AM
4

I think you misread what is being said there. They're agreeing with you, that these institutions no longer exist. Read the sentence broken up: Needless to say, there is not a renowned and powerful National Organization for Men to lobby against these grim and worsening realities and if there were it would be treated by a joke by those who didn’t dedicate themselves to eliminating or feminizing it the way they destroyed so many traditional all-male associations. In other words, no lobby exists but…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:18 AM
1

I read your comment the way you wrote it. You first say he lost his friends not because of his viewpoints but because of his manner. And then in your second paragraph talk about how he should not follow a certain viewpoint otherwise he will be mocked. Pick one. You are self-contradicting and you're blaming HIM for his "friends'" problems. He shouldn't have to change his views for acceptance. Especially not after ONE discussion. But if you like your high horse, you can stay on it. Why would he wa…
/r/MensRights01/07/13 02:29 AM
1

Welcome to the world we live in. Anyone who doesn't toe the feminist line is a misogynistic pig and anyone who hurts men is a hero. It's sick and twisted. While there were heros of feminism, they are spinning in their graves with the current crop of misandrists (not a default word in Google Chrome, I have just discovered) who run the movement now. I compare it to the MADD movement being taken over by closet abolitionists. Stay strong, if these people bailed on you for this, they were never your …
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:17 PM
2

So we're blaming him, now, are we? Because his friends left him after ONE argument. Yes, it's completely HIS fault. Ass.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:11 PM
2

"I am THE true conservative republican that is going to lose to Obama!" "No, I am the true conservative republican that is going to lose to Obama!"
/r/MensRights28/06/13 12:49 AM
63

I assume it's not a good idea to tell her you'd like to po-po-po-po-poker face.
/r/seduction09/06/13 06:23 AM
163

Man: My wife has been beating me for months on end and I'm finally at the end of my rope and I'm contemplating raising a hand to protect myself. Helpline: You MONSTER!
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:10 AM
1

Advertise your own "Men's Space" (but, in the fine print, allow anyone who wants to come, regardless of gender)
/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:49 PM
73

LOL, men cannot be raped!
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:26 PM
6

The worst part of this situation isn't the clear discrimination. It's the fact that one of the top universities in the Midwest cannot judge a person on their merit for the position based on the ACTIONS instead of inherent characteristics. It boggles my mind that this kind of thing is legal in the US.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 05:49 PM
-11

He's not a piece of shit for talking about abortion and suggesting it's wrong. He's a piece of shit for taking a very private moment and making it public for monetary gain. If you have to reference the Constitution to justify your comments, they are most definitely made in poor taste. Which is why he will be lambasted, justifiably, for these comments. Which were made only to stir up interest in his book.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 07:24 AM
16

prison rape has been a running gag for... well, longer than I've been alive. Isn't that the point? That men getting raped is hilarious but women getting raped is a tragedy.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 04:51 AM
1

There are two points I made, both of which are correct. Using 3g of acetaminophen or less per day will not cause liver damage in 99% of people who do not have underlying issues. Mixing a drink with a dose of tylenol will not cause problems. I do agree that binge drinking and tylenol use is a bad idea. But the liver failures due to acetaminophen use are generally due to intentional overdose or using multiple acetaminophen containing medications without knowing it. I would not suggest washing your…
/r/seduction10/05/13 03:44 AM
-3

More than 3g of Acetominophen is NOT good for your liver long term, though. FTFY And the if you have a drink and a tylenol, it's not going to kill you. Or do anything to your liver, frankly.
/r/seduction09/05/13 11:40 PM
28

"If we can lobby for [discrimination based on race, sex, and sexual orientation], we can help end racism, sexism, homophobia and warmongering" This just HAS to be a troll.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:54 PM
2

Hate begets hate. Regardless of whether you agree with the response or not, it happens.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:23 AM
1

But I remember rolling my eyes and saying something about that being some “white people’s foolishness,” to my friends, because who does that? Racist White girls do that. Racist
/r/MensRights13/04/13 02:01 AM
2

They are talking out of their vaginas. Followed you until this right here.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 09:14 PM
0

You are a hypocrite if you did this but like him when he said he hated chinks, spicks and gooks.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:34 PM
2

And coincidentally he was right up until he targeted you. Priceless.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:53 AM
7

I agreed until he posted this: http://i.imgur.com/aZr07ag.png Fuck you Mr. Rogan. Just because I don't like children I'm not "a hateful twat" "I liked <person X> until they said they didn't like <characteristic I have> and then I hated them." What a crock of shit. You liked him ripping on people until you yourself were a target? Fuck off, hypocrite.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:45 AM
39

Unfortunately, for her, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is QUITE CLEAR in stating that freedom of expression is only protected in as much as it does not threaten other people's safety. So, no, this is most definitely NOT freedom of expression, at least in the eyes of Canadian law. IANAL and I'm too lazy to cite.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 01:51 PM
2

On most of the measures, women had equal or better outcomes than men. The study is published in the May/June issue of the journal Women's Health Issues. Well that explains some things. I'd look at the study to see exactly what they used as outcomes (I really don't care), but I'm betting that they used a 50% in LDL cholesterol which is harder to do with a lower LDL, which women will tend to have vs men who are otherwise the same. Where are the hard outcomes (ie survival)? Men are still outlived b…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:02 AM
3

What evidence is there for that?
/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:54 PM
1

Just go up to him and: "Hey, you look familiar. Do you know John Doe? No? Too bad. I'm desperatefor." Guys rarely get approached by women, so be careful not to seem too desperate (despite your name), but something like that is a good deal breaker and works for women where it may be taken as BS in the reverse.
/r/seduction04/04/13 11:43 PM
25

7: up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, B, A
/r/seduction02/04/13 12:38 AM
-3

This comment on SRS really sums up SRS: This is the very definition of an echo chamber: Redditors have become so fully ensconced in their little bubble of misogyny and hate that it is unthinkable that there are people who could disagree with them. When exposed to the fact that their opinions are not mainstream, are not the majority, and that their shit is not acceptable to most people, they freak the fuck out because it's like trying to imagine a round square. Anybody else follow the Free Republ…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 12:29 AM
3

From the comments section of the Pharyngula blog: Dear men: Die. No, seriously. This is a rant, and it’s about you, personally. You, personally, are a ****, because statistics indicate there is an almost 100% certainty that you have either committed a rape, or wanted to commit a rape, or knowingly assisted or defended someone who committed a rape, or mocked a woman who was raped. And no, I’m not dropping links to tell you what you should damn well already know. Here is what you know: that you ar…
/r/MensRights24/03/13 05:06 PM
3

Or at least taken their pictures to the organizers and told them they were being annoying and loud.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 05:03 PM
1

Zero tolerance is for administrators who don't do their job. If there is no discretion required, what do we need so many of them for?
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:36 PM
2

Prior to this even they implicitly forbade what she did, after the fact they made it explicit. PyCon did NOT do the right thing. They did the EASY thing. At every turn.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:25 AM
5

This is not one of those times. It just makes the MRM community look like sexist assholes. So many other words that don't reference the fact she is female would have sufficed.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:32 PM
1

Male only scholarships : Female only scholarships - that ain't even close. My point was that there are people whose job it is to encourage women into STEM fields. I spoke to one and asked them if they thought it was silly that they were targeting women so much, yet the same thing wasn't happening in nursing, etc. We had a pretty good discussion, actually.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 01:17 AM
5

Of course they're not going into STEM by choice. Are there people that DON'T think this is the case? Holy fucking shit. There are actually people at university whose one and only job is to encourage women to go into those fields. WTF? Where is the funding to get more men into nursing? Or teaching? I'm sorry if this is non-sensical, but this whole situation is moronic.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:58 AM
8

The guy is saying people with mental health have crazy ideas. No one is laughing. They are highlighting the fact that this type of idea is completely socially unacceptable. But I guess you can just freak out about how offensive it is. And completely miss the point in doing so.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:45 AM
1

Based on the US justice system, it has to be the former.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:41 AM
1

I find it hard to believe that this is anything but a giant trolling.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:33 AM
7

False. They will not find jobs because the concept of justice is sexist. Also, patriarchy.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:57 PM
1

So let me get this straight, a random girl comes and sits next to you "by accident" and YOU seduce HER? Are you fucking shitting me?
/r/seduction07/03/13 08:39 AM
0

I guess what I'm trying to say is that, even if the girl right in front of you was naked and ready to fuck, some people would do nothing about it. Some dudes don't just want to fuck? NO FUCKING WAY!!!!!1
/r/seduction28/02/13 09:22 AM
6

It's the ones who HAVE ISSUES who believe that every one has issues as well. Classic projection.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 08:20 AM
10

You're right because obviously the point of mensrights is to call people names and make baseless accusations.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 02:48 PM
3

You are making a lot of assumptions here.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 06:55 PM
5

It's the same thing for female-on-male rape. How can you have accurate statistics if these men are laughed out of police stations?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 08:30 PM
1

See, there are good women out there. It's comments like this that make people outside of r/mensrights think this is a sexist subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 07:01 AM
2

having a lower survival rate =/= having a larger chance of dying from it What you are actually trying to say is that if you take the average woman and the average man having a heart attack, the woman is more likely to die. However, men are much more likely to have heart attacks so the average man is much more likely to die of a heart attack than the average woman. Why is this? Because women have a lot more non-classic signs of heart attacks. Men get that crushing in the chest you see on televisi…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:22 AM
2

You'd be saying the same thing that is said about once a month. Wait, was that a rhetorical question?
/r/seduction01/02/13 12:08 AM
1

I'll give you an example. I was talking with a few girls at a party once, from different walks of life. Somehow we got to talking about feminism and women and men being equal. One of the girls told me that women and men are equal and whatnot and spent a good time saying we should be treated equally. Then she told me that women are inherently better at raising children. This isn't someone that was a self-described feminist. This was just a regular woman who was talking with a guy at a party. What…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:58 PM
19

"While we believe that there should be free speech for all, we at the U of T Student Union believe that some people are more equal than others and some speech should be freer than others."
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:43 AM
22

Copied from Wikipedia: Erin Patria Margaret Pizzey (née Carney, born 19 February 1939) is a British family care activist and a best-selling novelist. She became internationally famous for having started one of the first[2] women's refuges (called women's shelters in the U.S.) in the modern world, Chiswick Women's Aid, in 1971,[3] the organisation known today as Refuge.[1] Pizzey has been the subject of death threats and boycotts because of her statement that most domestic violence is reciprocal,…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:00 PM
14

Wow. No evidence beyond an anonymous letter. That's just mind-boggling. It'd be just as likely that any one with any sort of bone to pick could send that than someone who legitimately thought they were being sexually harassed.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:50 PM
1

HAHAHAHA, it's funny because casual sexism against men is acceptable as casual racism against black and casual homophobia!!!!1 LOL
/r/MensRights20/01/13 10:01 AM
5

Physical force used on someone is a complete no-no, is it not? Just hint to the GM that you won't press charges as long as he talks to the floor manager.
/r/seduction20/01/13 02:39 AM
-26

That is an article from the Washington Post. Thank you for wasting my time. Enjoy the downvote. It's one of those few times where it's actually earned based on reddiquette.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:53 AM
1

"The class as a whole feel we don’t need (strip clubs) in society, that we should have outgrown that by now," Mechalchuk said, adding it’s not just about closing the club. "It’s about increasing people’s knowledge." Exactly what knowledge are they raising? Modern media (movies, television and magazines) do a LOT more to objectify women than strip clubs. They do this to a MUCH bigger audience. "It takes more courage to take on something local like this, something people are passionate about," he …
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:45 AM
1

That was heavy, heavy sarcasm.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:10 AM
-7

Shhhhhh, just drink the Kool-aid.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:37 PM
1

Well women are generally the ones working and paying into social security and whatnot.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 10:30 AM
5

Men having institutionalized problems?! No way! Just look at history! Look at all we've had to overcome! It's really easy to see problems when you've faced them, but if you haven't, it's easy to dismiss them. Can someone explain this to me. How did men have it so much better? Life sucked hard until what, the early-mid 20th century, but then bam, World Wars killing of soldier who are, surprise surprise, men. I mean, I'm sure people tell themselves women were the true victims of war, but that's ju…
/r/MensRights13/01/13 07:15 PM
103

I am not an American, but I am quite certain that freedom of speech is quite limited in schools.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:32 AM
2

Fingering her, but what? DON'T LEAVE US HANGING!!!!
/r/seduction12/01/13 10:34 AM
3

Myths, stereotypes, and unfounded beliefs about male sexuality, in particular male homosexuality, are widespread in legal and medical communities, as well as among agencies providing services to sexual assault victims. These include perceptions that men in noninstitutionalized settings are rarely sexually assaulted, that male victims are responsible for their assaults, that male sexual assault victims are less traumatized by the experience than their female counterparts, and that ejaculation is …
/r/MensRights11/01/13 07:35 AM
14

Say what you want about everything else, but if you think that counsellors or rape crisis center employees categorically cannot be unprofessional based solely on their job, then you're simply a fucking moron.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 07:20 AM
9

Fragile people (ie recent rape victims) tend to perceive things differently than the average person.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 07:17 AM
4

That shit is just made up garbage. Also, domestic rape is not considered rape in India.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:15 PM
-4

The joke was funny the first 5 times it was made. It is getting tired.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 08:19 AM
1

It was news when it was posted a week ago. I'm whining about something being reposted after a week.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 11:33 PM
2

I had this naive notion that I would find another virgin to marry and we'd lose it together. Why, oh why, would you want to do that?
/r/MensRights29/12/12 11:31 PM
-10

How many times is this story going to get re-posted?
/r/MensRights29/12/12 11:28 AM
2

we could aim for a more fair parenthood deal, but that would just shift a lot of those kids' answers from 'dad' to 'mum.' No, it would shift it to "mum and dad living together" which is far less heartbreaking. And the evidence shows that children are far better off with joint custody than sole custody to a single parent.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 04:33 AM
-2

Well, the fact that it is #5 for fathers and #23 for mothers would suggest that divorce is a much bigger factor than death.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 11:47 PM
1

You can have specialization without exclusion though. Call your local gynecologist and ask for an appointment. "Exclusion" of this kind exists for logistical reasons, not due to prejudice.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 09:23 AM
1

I don't understand the intricacies of HIPPA, so I'll leave my comments on that, but on this: Beyond that, though, if they're married she'd automatically have power of attorney over him if he were incapacitated, so his rights to protect his health information from her are to some extent compromised already. This is wrong. She doesn't have that right until he's incapacitated. Just like children don't get their parents money if they're bequeathed it until they die.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:27 PM
1

This is a grossly ignorant statement. Having a program that targets women (and their unique issues with newborns, breast-feeding, etc) is not biasing anything, it's targeting a specific population that NEEDS treatment different from what is available (ie that which targets males and their specific needs).
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:20 PM
1

And men have a bunch of other programs that address their needs. Having a women's program doesn't preclude men from having their own, much the way that having a men's centre at a university doesn't deny women their women's centre.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:18 PM
1

This is the EXACT idiotic argument feminists make. Because women suffer more in X, Y and Z, men's issues don't matter. Do people not see the hypocrisy. And female HIV has the potential to affect babies and this sort of transmission is completely different than that faced by men. Why wouldn't the government want a specific program to address this?
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:17 PM
1

Because men and women have different problems when it comes to HIV. Women have issues such as breast feeding and vertical transmission. Making programs that are completely gender neutral would be a poor idea. Specialization is useful in this area. But the knee-jerk reaction of the forum goes against the best interest of patients and is quite disturbing.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:15 PM
-6

So because men's issues with HIV are worse than women's, we should just ignore women? This is sounding mighty familiar... Edit: I'm quite disgusted by the responses below. The talk about men's problems being worse than women's is EXACTLY the argument feminists make to minimize men's issues. Making gender-neutral treatment is like telling a woman to go to a urologist rather than a gynecologist for female specific problems (ie idiotic). And just because men are the majority of HIV cases, this does…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:31 PM
4

You should ask her why a guy who is that much of a catch would ever want to date, let alone marry, a neurotic, 30-something divorcee.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 05:32 AM
2

Um, it coerces him to disclose information to his wife. So I have no idea how this doesn't violate HIPPA, but then again, I am no Yank.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 03:05 AM
3

Kimmel's work in general is about how we as a society teach boys that violence is the way to handle situations. Is that really what happens? Or are men just taught (as you say later on) not to have emotions and just to "man up"?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:42 AM
9

PIZZA HUT IS THE OPPRESSOR!!!
/r/MensRights20/12/12 12:16 AM
2

I assume in this class you would do more than sing songs about how logic and critical reasoning are lacking?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 11:20 PM
12

But the evidence is sexist! /s
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:05 PM
7

Well lady, if someone does marry your unfortunate son, they'll certainly get the mother-in-law from hell ! In other words, the mother-in-law who will not accept her daughter-in-law not carrying her half of the marriage. But, yeah, I guess if she doesn't acquiesce to the entitled lifestyle, then I guess that'd be hellish.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:04 PM
1

He's just a nice guy and she'll come around to him soon. Or he's been married to his high school sweetheart and just shouldn't be commenting.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:03 PM
2

One could interact with a lot more of them if one desired.
/r/seduction16/12/12 01:05 AM
4

I replied to my friend's FB post saying, "Is it at all possible that just more guys like punk rock?" And she quickly responded "Absolutely not," as I was reprimanded by a handful of her feminist friends for even suggesting the idea. Well, if we look at pop music, Justin Beiber must be the most sexist human on the planet. Also, agist.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 07:36 PM
1

I've noticed MRs generally have an antagonistic tone/style in discussions (guilty here as well). Many people are hurt and angry who come to this sub and well OP's screenshot is a fall-out of just that. Face it, our conversations don't have decades of mediums where civil discourses have commonly been held about our topics (e.g., College Course on Men's Studies). It's called confirmation bias. Most of the discourse here is quite civil, but you're blinded by your biases.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:40 PM
22

She points out that women physicians work longer hours than most scientists, under arguably more stressful conditions, but that this does not deter women from entering medicine. This is the stupidest fucking argument because: a) doctors >> scientists when it comes to type A personalities b) male physicians work longer hours than female physicians The fact that this person is considered a scientist is mind boggling. Cherry picking evidence and completely ignoring evidence that utterly destroys he…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:32 AM
1

I too would like an explanation.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:03 PM
9

This is what sexism looks like in the West in the 21st century. A person is beaten and everyone watches doing nothing. Why? Because the attacker is a woman and the victim is a man.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:57 PM
29

The thing is, this is a comedy show where everyone rips on everyone all the time. He does make a good point, though.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 06:27 PM
1

So you're saying that I shouldn't let one single thing become the centre point of my life? Thanks, tips.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 08:57 PM
1

I think it is hard for people to understand depression if they haven't experienced it. No, I don't buy that. It's only hard to understand depression if you completely lack empathy.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:24 AM
3

"She is not a bad person, but by the jury's verdict she did a bad thing. She made a terrible mistake in circumstances when she couldn't cope with rejection." Couldn't that be said about rape? Or murder? What in the flying fuck.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:31 AM
6

No, no, no, you don't understand. The fact that men feel threatened doesn't matter because women's feelings are more important than men's.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:53 AM
1

You have a chance to stand up for something you believe. Don't miss out. But you can't do this in a stupid manner. You need the following: Talk to your parents. Tell them what your teacher told you and that you're not backing down. If they won't support you, maybe ask a teacher you trust. Re-work the paper to include citations as someone above suggested. Include the sources themselves if you have to so the teacher can read them herself. If she fails you. Go to the principle. If she doesn't suppo…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:25 AM
57

HOW CAN SHE KICK?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 06:23 PM
1

Too many dudes latched onto the concept and did exactly what you say (I went a bit overboard at first too but learned quick) and now girls are wise to the game. No, that is incorrect. While the OP is incorrect about the definition of negging, he was right about one thing: If, however, you're an underconfident newbie, and you try to neg, it'll only amount to you walking around and insulting people. Cut that shit out. That is why you perceive women as "becoming wise to the game". Even if woman rea…
/r/seduction07/11/12 06:01 AM
-2

This bill is never going to pass, was never meant to pass and was never meant to be taken seriously. The arguments I see here how vasectomies and abortions are not the same or about how women have it so much better than men in reproductive rights. Who cares. The point she is making is that reproductive rights, THE WHOLE SPECTRUM OF THEM, should be at the discretion of each individual in question. And she is right. She is also right the government has no place sticking its head into private matte…
/r/MensRights31/10/12 05:33 PM
-1

So you're basically shifting the discussion away from what is being discussed, to "oh, you think orphans don't deserve scholarships?" Again, as I said, you're a disingenuous a-hole.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 01:43 AM
2

His point is that having the option is the harmful part.
/r/seduction30/10/12 05:13 PM
2

People here are talking about #1. You are jumping to #2. You either fail horribly at reading between the lines (we are on MR) or you're intentionally misconstruing what people are saying for your own benefit. If it's the latter, you're an a-hole.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:02 PM
-1

That's different. A lot of the time MRA directly opposes Feminism even though the problems Feminism faces are greater. You fail to cite any examples.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:13 PM
-2

SRS is interested in gender equality from the women's side but the way they see it MR is just butting in and saying "oh yeah, me too". Honestly, the couldn't the same be said about feminism in the western world vs. feminism in the developing world. I mean, couldn't someone say that feminists in the western world are crybabies because women in Africa have it so much worse? No, because that is stupid. Having it better than someone else is not equatable to having it swell. And just because there ar…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:48 AM
-1

If women are going to say "Only men can stop rape", then I guess it's fair to say "Only women can stop false rape accusations." False. Only men rape, so, obviously, if men didn't rape there would be no false rape accusation.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:12 AM
2

Facts, Schmacts.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 04:57 AM
9

"Well, you can prove anything with facts, can't you?" -Stewart Lee
/r/MensRights17/10/12 06:23 AM
25

Ah yes. Well of course he didn't realize it, everyone knows that women are the abused and men are the abusers.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:35 AM
-12

You're proud of you lack of taste in liquor? And you drink regularly. I'm a bit embarrassed for you. Unless of course you save the good stuff for yourself, then in that case, well played.
/r/seduction09/10/12 06:23 AM
-10

Mixed feelings? Really? You don't have to agree with the guy to respect him. And if you don't respect Noam Chomsky, the I say: You, my friend, are an idiot.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:17 AM
6

As a loud talker, people will leave if you're not also witty.
/r/seduction29/09/12 08:15 PM
1

And then he ended with "Just sayin'." Sigh...
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:18 AM
2

So depending on "workplace culture and the recourses that are available to employees", sexual harassment may or may not be illegal? Do you even know how laws work?
/r/MensRights14/09/12 11:41 PM
11

Just for the record: PYLL* due to prostate cancer: 0.268 million in 2008 (breast cancer: 0.766) PYLL* due to heart disease (in males): 4.074 million in 2008 (almost 1 million more than women) Anyone else think that highlighting prostate cancer instead of heart disease is a bit misguided? Hell, the same thing goes for targeting breast cancer over heart disease. *PYLL = Person-years of life lost Source
/r/MensRights14/09/12 11:39 PM
5

"If you act up once more, you'll have to stand outside for 30 seconds." FTFY
/r/MensRights14/09/12 11:02 PM
1

I'm going to go out on a limb and say if a defendant/plaintiff spoke over a judge more than 1, they'd be held in contempt. Of course, this IS television.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:03 AM
5

Do you have a problem with a man playfully teasing a female friend's breast without permission? Of course you do because it is FUCKED UP.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:03 AM
14

They equate speech against feminists as speech against women. But they're advocating against MR... do they not see the irony?
/r/MensRights10/09/12 09:37 PM
4

There is an article I read about this situation from which I got this lovely tidbit: "It’s really just an echo chamber of misogyny and hatred of women in general," Jamie James told OpenFile. "This self-victimization that women are evil and trying to tear down men, when you confront these ideas, people sometimes realize that isn’t what they meant when they said they support this movement.”
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:39 PM
4

I read this last night and I feel like I'm missing the man hate. Hell, I just went back and 1 of the top 10 comments are excusing her actions. Something like 5 of the top 10 comments are jokes. Of course, if it were a woman, 5 of the top 10 comments would be propositions.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:21 PM
3

Patriarchy. Patriarchy patriarchy, patriarchy. PA triarchy.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 05:28 PM
1

Right, you hate the mother because the daughter CLAIMED RAPE to avoid getting in trouble for a party. If your daughter said something like that, wouldn't you believe her? You are hating the wrong person.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:08 AM
2

Well, if their thinking that they'd rather do the procedure themselves in than let the girl get a back alley procedure from someone who isn't a medical professional. Profit really isn't the motivating factor here because the risks far outweigh the financial gains. Those performing these procedures were likely doing them on principle.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 12:16 AM
3

That's fuckin team-woooork!
/r/MensRights29/08/12 01:52 PM
7

women are getting abortions anyway and crooked two-time doctors are getting paid serious money to do horrible butchery. I'd be willing to bet it was less about being crooked and more about being undertrained and underequiped.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:52 AM
14

You didn't get downvoted to oblivion because of an anti-MR bias (although, undoubtedly SOME of the downvotes were because of people like this), your post was downvoted because the article in question is a piece of shit. Also, the drug was only approved less than a month ago, and as the say goes, don't attribute to malice what can be attributed to human stupidity. Also, don't take obvious trolling to be the thoughts of a community. If you post a low quality article, you WILL get trolled and hones…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 05:23 PM
20

"the campus men's center is called the faculty lounge, ass". People who claim that all men are advantaged over women because 1% of men are advantaged are fucking idiots.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 11:24 PM
2

Queue comments on pour spelling.
/r/seduction23/08/12 01:27 AM
1

Nascar is way more than 90% male. Is that sexist? Only if you're a moron.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:40 AM
-6

My point is that theoretically, there shouldn't be a problem with 90% enrollment of women in a field shouldn't be a problem. But it is a problem because the average woman in the same field tends to not work as much lifetime as a man does. And you're comparing a specific subgroup (young, career-oriented women) to basically all people in society. Also, nice downvote. You ought to read reddiquette.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:33 PM
24

Like it has been pointed out, this is popular definitions, not definitions. I mean, "imaginary sky fairy" nails Jesus Christ in my house in no time flat, but in other houses, they'd struggle.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:29 PM
0

tl;dr: Comparing "studs" to "sluts" is a false dichotomy.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:23 PM
-26

The problem isn't that there are lots of women or that women can't work as hard as men. It's that society tells women they have to stay at home with the kids and so they do not work as hard as men. To a stay-at-home mom: "Good for you on taking care of the kids." To a stay-at-home dad: "Deadbeat."
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:15 PM
4

I am assuming that he means that exams tend to focus on minutiae rather than fundamentals and applications of fundamental principles.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 09:13 PM
2

The feminist movement was started to address real imbalances Accurate, but now it is about correcting current imbalances and putting women above men. 0.5% of men get "male privilege", the rest get fucked in the ass.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 03:40 AM
21

If my car is unlocked with the keys in it when my car gets stolen its not my fault but i did make it easy for the thief didn't i. I'm pretty sure your insurance company would think differently.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 10:39 PM
7

There are two concepts in this image. The creator understands neither of them.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 12:58 AM
0

The person who sent the text doesn't in anyway suggest that they find it funny. They seem to be reporting the situation as it happened (allegedly).
/r/MensRights29/07/12 08:18 PM
5

My point is you can get the same effect without being douchey. Yeah, it may take more tries to get the effect you want, but you only have to get outside your comfort zone, not completely obliterate it.
/r/seduction08/07/12 10:18 PM
5

I bet if you added a message "then I guess I should just rape you", you'd get ripped apart on facebook for joking about rape. Male on female rape. You know, the only TRUE rape.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 06:56 PM
59

You don't need to be a complete douche to get women. You just have to not be a gutless pussy.
/r/seduction08/07/12 05:17 PM
6

"You find me offensive? I find you offensive for finding me offensive ." -Eminem
/r/MensRights30/06/12 03:04 PM
1

Colonoscopies: now screening for prostate cancer.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:47 AM
3

It's not like those men don't know what they are doing to increase their risk. This is not the case. The average person is exceedingly ignorant about their health.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 04:43 PM
3

Obama is just sucking women's dicks so they vote for him.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 09:08 AM
3

I thought he meant circlejerking...
/r/seduction31/05/12 07:53 AM
150

"Dear reddit, a girl took me into her bed and is taking off my pants. How can I make sure to get laid?"
/r/seduction26/05/12 03:35 PM
5

Well, that was actually a well written article.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 08:09 PM
-1

That's a mighty sexist way of looking at things. Assuming the man is the breadwinner.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 01:11 AM
20

Unfortunately, as a 16 year old boy, the victim is unable to make that decision by himself, as per American law, as he is not of the age of consent. And hypothetically speaking, someone could be raped and like it. That doesn't stop it from being rape.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 12:30 AM
-6

Apparently, in Pointer1VB's mind, women having sex outside is portraying them in a bad light. Welcome to the 1950s.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:04 PM
5

So, why don't you try and meet women you'd actually want to date instead of just fucking women when you know it's not fulfilling? Yeah, time will make things better, but so will dating a girl you actually like.
/r/seduction07/05/12 04:58 PM
0

If she was released, presumably she didn't do anything. Innocent before proven guilty and all that crap. You really have no clue how the justice system works, do you?
/r/MensRights30/04/12 11:12 PM
6

Yeah, and if she gets released again, she's got a chance to terrorize another man who won't be able to recognize her.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:52 PM
1

"I guess your loss is someone else's gain."
/r/seduction13/04/12 05:36 AM
4

They're trying to have males advocate against domestic violence (aka intimate partner violence). I see nothing wrong with that, in fact both sexes should be involved. What I do have a problem with that basically all these programs reach out to men only because women do not commit acts of violence.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:04 PM
3

You sound very jaded and heading down a dangerous path towards becoming an MRA/misogynist. That word does not mean what you think it means.
/r/seduction08/04/12 11:04 PM
28

There is something I have learned in the past few years. Any time a woman says "I am not <something>", she is most DEFINITELY whatever something she claims not to be!
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:36 PM
2

Consent for a medical procedure, just like sexual consent, can be withdrawn at any time. The question here is not about his original consent, but whether he communicated the removal of consent for this procedure. If he did, then he did not consent to the procedure. And that is completely ignoring any possible coercion.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 06:17 PM
1

because the husband, Chukwudera B. Okoli, had originally consented That is NOT how consent works.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 04:10 PM
7

What apology?
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:11 AM
4

Cracked sucks ass. Also, the guy doesn't even understand what sexism is. Don't waste your time.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:20 PM
2

It's funny, because the only thing that will happen is empty apologies. No one will even attempt to shut that shit down.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 11:05 AM
-24

Because it is a completely false comparison? Why not use the fact that the medical benefits are close to nil and the risk of bad things happening are more than that.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 09:43 AM
4

I want people conscripted EQUALLY, so then more people have something to lose and therefore more people to oppose conscription.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:48 AM
32

It IS poisoning.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 05:18 PM
0

Relevant. Dumbass.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:02 PM
3

I used to be hoverhand extrordinaire, and now I'm working my way up the ladder. Hover tongue?
/r/seduction03/02/12 09:50 PM
31

heavily kinoing each other for a good 15 min I think the proper term here is groping. Groping.
/r/seduction03/02/12 06:29 PM
1

So in short, you didn't get laid.
/r/seduction30/01/12 08:20 AM
6

All the while my cute friend just put her arms around me and rested her head on me until everybody left and we went into my room. Well don't leave us hanging, then what happened?
/r/seduction30/01/12 02:10 AM
0

Bitter and douchey? No, more like selective about the women he's willing to date. If she's going to play stupid games like this, she is NOT a woman you want to get involved with. But you can continue to completely miss the point if that works better for you.
/r/seduction28/01/12 05:25 PM
7

Her: I feel bad. I do like you. You: Maybe you should think before you say things with the next guy.
/r/seduction28/01/12 07:06 AM
7

Yeah, but Tina Paone isn't a real woman, so it doesn't count. Real women wouldn't do this.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:55 PM
-4

LOL
/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:54 PM
8

Therefore, any surgery is technically physical harm, which is why you must consent to surgery. This should extend to ear piercing then, should it not?
/r/MensRights27/01/12 11:13 AM
2

I am very much against circumcision. My personal beliefs, however, are neither supported nor rebutted by the evidence at this point. I suspect that in time, the evidence against circumcision will outweigh that for it, but I cannot misrepresent what is out there.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 12:00 AM
-2

Shortly after birth, the appendix becomes a reservoir for enteric flora that colonize the lumen of the cecum. It is hypothesized that extended exposure of appendiceal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue to this reservoir of bacteria leads to the development and maintenance of immunological tolerance to commensal flora.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 11:59 PM
-7

Circumcision decreases the risk of UTIs in boys Circumcision protects against penile cancer Circumcision protects against some STIs While I don't advocate for circumcision, saying there are no "real" benefits is a untrue. Of course, the benefits are small and to the average person almost negligible. But as for as the evidence goes, it is real.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 11:56 PM
-19

There is no medical benefits of female circumcision. There ARE medical benefits of male circumcision, but there are also risks involved. I believe at this time, the evidence going either way is close to equivocal. tl;dr: apples and oranges Edit: I'd like to point out, that I was trying to be reasonable here, but holy crap, both sides of the argument are full of assholes. I'm anti-circumcision, but that should not matter, the facts are what are important. But it seems as though rhetoric rules bot…
/r/MensRights25/01/12 10:46 PM
1

Then he's a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 07:02 AM
-6

I also found the sexist males I met were usually just poking fun and actually respected me. Yet you call them sexist. Sexism means you judge someone as inferior due to what they have in their pants, not that you poke fun at someone.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 03:31 PM
2

people are entitled to their irrational discrimination. Am I confused about US laws or are you trying to tell me that open racial discrimination by private companies is legal?
/r/MensRights23/01/12 03:30 PM
3

What in the flying fuck?
/r/MensRights22/01/12 12:48 AM
-1

I'm not embarrassed to admit that his jokes and confidence were appealing to me, and that him admitting he has to try really hard to be that way, was not. You were attracted to his confidence, but his confidence was all a charade, so why wouldn't you lose interest in the guy completely?
/r/seduction17/01/12 12:58 AM
2

Yeah, but he went full pussy. You NEVER go full pussy!
/r/seduction17/01/12 12:56 AM
7

If she actually likes you, she's likely just playing hard, so go again later. Most importantly, don't be a bitch about it regardless of the situation.
/r/seduction15/01/12 10:17 PM
27

That's because you're picking up women that just want to get fucked.
/r/seduction17/12/11 03:31 AM
1

Just follow this advice.
/r/seduction17/12/11 01:18 AM
5

See how easy seduction is? The path is laid out for you... just have to walk it. SHE was setting herself up. What he did was the anti-thesis to seduction. In fact, if she was naked an sat on his face, he'd probably apologize for getting in her way and move.
/r/seduction17/12/11 01:13 AM
3

It's not really being grown up. It's more being selfless and then being fucked in the ass for it later.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 01:26 AM
23

she hasn't lived in the adult world long enough to form an opinion worth analysing. Her parents are still supporting her ass through university, so she hasn't lived the adult life AT ALL.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 05:32 AM
23

so the men suck it up and do jobs they don't like. And that, right there, is the definition of "manning up".
/r/MensRights13/12/11 05:29 AM
10

She's facing attempted first degree murder charges? What'll she get? 1? 2 year on probation.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 07:30 PM
3

He was a die-hard try-hard.
/r/seduction09/12/11 06:01 PM
1

How old are you? Reading some if tour posts here you sound like a better 20 year old boy.
/r/seduction08/12/11 04:54 AM
4

And the reality is that women are still the primary care-givers for any children, whether they earn more than their husbands or not. Obviously fact.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 07:07 PM
-3

There are other benefits to circumcision, mainly a decrease in urinary tract infections, but at the moment, the evidence for and against circumcision is basically equal. Which would lead me to be believe it shouldn't be done.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 01:35 PM
3

force them to eat meals from their school What?
/r/MensRights18/11/11 11:13 PM
5

Hell, it could apply to men too.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 12:22 AM
20

The guy is suggesting that high school grades are a better predictor of success than standardized testing. Apparently he hasn't heard of grade inflation.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 06:14 PM
5

Ah, shit happens. If I took this shit seriously, I'd already be hanging in my fucking closet.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 07:51 AM
15

Hahaha, obvious, not obviously. It was an honestly mistake.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 12:45 AM
-4

Gavin Doig, prosecuting, said: 'The most serious injury was obvious to the police when Mr Douglas pulled aside the towel he was wearing. 'They were able to see his scrotum was ripped, his testicles were exposed and bloodied and it was the defendant that had done this to him.' This is really disturbing. A guy gets his scrotum ripped open and the police are the ones who suffered the most serious injury? How the hell is this guy even a prosecutor?
/r/MensRights11/11/11 11:36 PM
0

I look at this situation the same as if it was a 19 year old boy and a 16 year old girl. Really, do you? How can you compare a 34 year-old woman to a 19 year-old man (or boy, as you put it)? I know it's not the law, but shouldn't a person who is over a decade into adulthood better than a "boy" just old enough to go to war (but not yet old enough to drink)?
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:04 PM
1

You're comparing a relationship between a man and a woman to walking through the ghetto. No, I don't sound like a feminist, but you sound like a douche.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 09:31 PM
2

So what you're saying is, that the victim here is responsible. Fuck. That. Shit.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 09:26 PM
11

It's because women have a "maternal instinct" that would prevent them from EVER abusing their children while men are violent. This is of course bullshit. Both women and men are capable of abuse.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 07:36 PM
1

Maybe I want to hire only Russians because I speak russian and english. Is that discrimination? There are non-Russians who are fluent in Russian. If you want a particular skill, ask for it. And it may be your business, but this is not only your country, so you abide by the laws of the land. Or you get F-ed in your A.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 10:31 PM
1

This is where the Jackie Chan WTF face would go.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 04:28 PM
2

My point was exactly as stated: that such cases are, most likely, a minority. So because a thing doesn't happen most of the time, it's not a problem? Date rape cases are, most likely, a minority. See how dumb that is?
/r/MensRights02/11/11 01:39 AM
0

Translation: You guys are fucking morons and I can do what I want.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 01:31 AM
11

Then don't stop working to raise kids. What? He said he's raising the kids. That IS work. Now if you meant, don't quit your job, then say that.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 11:55 PM
7

Withholding sex from someone who deserves it is abuse.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:18 AM
5

Not in my opinion. That's great. The law is not your opinion.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 06:51 AM
12

Her lawyer's paralegal, who had recommended Butler, "made this all seem completely legal and as though it was standard practice" in divorce cases, she said. WTF is wrong with people that this didn't set off alarms in her head? "Oh, don't worry, setting your husband up is a normal thing to do. Everyone's doing it!"
/r/MensRights17/10/11 01:16 PM
15

They are the victims here.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 01:15 PM
5

And I was worried that men in Montana were having a really bad week.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 07:23 PM
-8

Well they're rapists, aren't they? They deserve it.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 04:20 AM
-7

Someone doesn't know how to bold. giggles
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:25 PM
16

Apparently, only women who give up careers, and not men who do the same.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:22 PM
2

That's equality under the eyes of almost every feminist. Feminists want equality?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 03:43 AM
3

If it was on purpose, he doctor could have successfully been prosecuted for battery. Likely it was an error, but not double checking is inexcusable.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 04:42 AM
3

I hate to interrupt this female circlejerk, but many women put a lot of artificial limits on sex as well. A man who doesn't want to have sex with a woman because they're not comfortable with the situation is immature and a woman could do better, but I take it that if a woman is uncomfortable, the guy should just deal with it? Typical.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 10:29 PM
2

It's interesting that you believe that most doctors sell out everything they believe in.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 04:19 PM
8

I think the most telling thing is how many doctors refuse to do circumcisions despite the fact that they are quite lucrative.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 05:23 PM
2

Normally I would be against the cops when it comes othis sort of stuff. Why are your proud of this? You're against cops making public service announcements? Most rapists don't give a flying fuck what women wear, they'll just fucking rape them so saying not to wear skimpy outfits for no reason is wrong. But there is obviously a profile of the rapist here and they are sharing safety tips with the public. Sorry you can't get indignant about that.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 05:02 PM
38

Most high stress workplaces are hostile to women. And hostile to men, too.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 06:54 PM
3

Why not talk to a male nurse?
/r/MensRights08/09/11 04:18 AM
4

Yes, you're more likely to get accepted. But you are a lot less likely to get money handed to you because of the shit between your legs.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 04:16 AM
3

<insert rabid "feminist" response>
/r/MensRights08/09/11 04:15 AM
10

While it may make sense, ignores the fact that the (primary/elementary) schooling system is gear a lot more toward girls than it is toward boys. Why is that never suggested as a reason?
/r/MensRights24/08/11 01:08 AM
3

Women would probably feel safer if ALL men were in jail. So lets just do that, too. You know because making women feel safe is more important than stupid things like personal freedoms and justice.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 05:16 AM
7

Then stop fucking sticking your click in crazy. There is nothing worthy of discussion at AMR. It's 1) trolls trolling trolls and 2) crazy people (who DO NOT represent even a fraction of the population) talking about how much they hate men.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 05:04 AM
8

Don't stick your click in crazy.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:21 AM
9

Good job blaming an intoxicated person for being raped by the way. How you think she intends to 'profit' from the humiliation of being date-raped I haven't the foggiest. So instead, we're blaming the intoxicated person with a penis.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 04:42 PM
1

Police said the father voluntarily provided a urine sample for a drug screen by DCF, which was negative for any controlled substance. So if I call the DCF hotline and randomly claim someone is using drugs, they'll basically force them into doing a drug test. What the fuck is this shit?
/r/MensRights19/08/11 02:37 PM
-1

I think you ought to buddy up with the women's rights group to do a few things together to promote gender equality. HAHAHAHAHA. It's funny because you think women's rights groups at universities are interested in equality.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 03:03 AM
5

Sorry, OCD was acting up. Upvoted. I'm pretty sure it's your lack of understanding of the English language that is flaring up.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:33 AM
1

A victim who knowingly engaged in sex that was likely to give guys HIV. Insertive penile-vaginal intercourse - 05% risk of infection per exposure Fucking science, how does that work?
/r/MensRights11/08/11 03:40 AM
3

I believe his point is that SharkSpider is making a statement, and the first sentence in his statement is false. He didn't even say that this makes the rest of what he said suspect, but now I am making that suggestion.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 10:36 PM
1

Option #3: It's an understandable oversight by the government (only 1 in 100 cases of breast cancer are in men), but one that should be rectified.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 10:41 PM
6

You have heard today from panel members that Social Security as a guaranteed, inflation-proofed retirement and disability insurance system is essential for women. "Is essential for women", as in they NEED it, not "is essentially for women" as in only for them. Fucking reading... how does that work? And the points they raise are very valid. There is discrepancy in pay between women and men. There are arguments on both sides for WHY that is, but when it comes to seniors, they need help, regardless…
/r/MensRights05/08/11 10:28 PM
1

I'm new here too, but if your student handbook refers to an accused student as basically a guilty student, how is that justice? I mean, I'm sure many people accused of abuse, etc did it, but there is a minority who didn't. Imagine if justice system was designed this way.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 03:32 AM
1

Actually, saying that women who have suffered female circumcision are mutilated freaks who can't enjoy a sex life is an insult to women who have undergone female circumcision. Indeed. Which is why I said no such thing.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:44 AM
-4

Elective circumcision is a cosmetic procedure, unlike its therapeutic counterpart which is a medical procedure. And you can easily ban one and not the other. I feel like banning it wholesale isn't the best idea because it is a religious thing. And comparing male to female circumcision is an insult to women who have suffered female circumcision.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 02:50 PM
-4

Elective circumcision is a cosmetic procedure, unlike its therapeutic counterpart which is a medical procedure. And you can easily ban one and not the other. I feel like banning it wholesale isn't the best idea because it is a religious thing. And comparing male to female circumcision is an insult to women who have suffered female circumcision.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 02:50 PM
3

“Everybody is on their feet defending Grove and defending the management, but no one seems to have given a thought to this girl,” said Gaughran. “It’s quite disturbing.” ??????
/r/MensRights26/07/11 04:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter