TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

noth1ngbettertodo Archive

View 13 posts and 87 comments by noth1ngbettertodo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
40

Legal Rightsnoth1ngbettertodo/r/MensRights30/11/15 06:16 PM
35

noth1ngbettertodo/r/MensRights19/02/16 05:25 PM
27

Generalnoth1ngbettertodo/r/MensRights11/12/15 04:22 PM
18

Activism/Supportnoth1ngbettertodo/r/MensRights02/12/15 09:23 PM
13

Legal Rightsnoth1ngbettertodo/r/MensRights30/11/15 12:57 AM
10

noth1ngbettertodo/r/MensRights10/01/16 06:10 AM
6

Legal Rightsnoth1ngbettertodo/r/MensRights19/02/16 07:10 PM
6

Feminismnoth1ngbettertodo/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:54 AM
5

Generalnoth1ngbettertodo/r/MensRights29/02/16 04:27 AM
5

Questionsnoth1ngbettertodo/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:26 PM
4

Discriminationnoth1ngbettertodo/r/MensRights25/02/16 05:48 AM
2

noth1ngbettertodo/r/askTRP14/12/15 05:38 PM
0

noth1ngbettertodo/r/MensRights04/09/16 10:59 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Wow, I had to stop listening to that. Not because of the level of hate, bigotry and stupidity of their statements, but I just couldn't take Gigi saying the word "like" anymore. I imagine she probably said it over 100 times in the first 5 minutes.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 03:46 AM
1

So the way it works, is when someone stupid calls something stupid, it actually means it's actually intelligent. It's called a "double negative" - are you familiar with the concept?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 03:43 AM
1

They have to investigate every claim I believe, he should bog them down and weigh them down.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 07:09 AM
1

If you treat people the same, aren't you treating them equal? Aren't same and equal synonyms? Like the number 2 and the number 2 are the same number, they are also equal to each other?
/r/MensRights08/10/16 05:36 AM
1

I think in a situation like this I might not show them the hand I'm dealing with, so that they can fly as high as they can go, and so the crash landing hurts even more.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/16 12:48 AM
1

I just love how devoid of reality the comic is.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 03:09 AM
1

Saying "'Feminism is Cancer' promotes hate", promotes hate.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 03:08 AM
1

Give it a try the next time you're in a situation where you are acting like a decent human being, and some radical third wave feminist is acting like a radical third wave feminist. And you have to come off as serious, I don't say it jokingly. I say it as serious as possible, and if they challenge or question me, I just double down on my conviction, I double down on my tone. Rules for escalation, dont back down, if they one up you, you one up them, and you stick to it. Seriously, they live in thi…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 12:58 AM
3

Guys, its time to start playing the "feminist" game. It's time to start acting like stupid children and just do and say whatever you want, and they have given us the tools to do so. One time I got accused of "mansplaining" - I replied, "Well, that's impossible, I identify as a woman!". And I said it in a very defensive/aggressive tone - she apologized and backed off. This is the answer to all of our problems in dealing with the cunty feminists - just tell them you identify as a woman.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 10:55 PM
1

Behaving like a woman is supposed to be a downside.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 04:06 AM
-8

Yeah, don't back down, don't let them win, you are acting like a normal healthy social human being. These crazy feminists want to destroy culture and have full power over the conversations and relationships between men and women. Just keep doing what you are doing and people will realize her false accusations and exaggerations are bullshit when they see all you are doing is sending friendly messages and acting polite and social. If anyone accuses you of "acting like a creep", tell them to provid…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:00 PM
1

So the numbers are bullshit because how ridiculous they define sexual assault and battery? Unwanted kissing? Unwanted touching?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 05:37 AM
1

At the nine schools during the 2014-2015 academic year, with 2 percent to 8 percent of female students experiencing the trauma of a completed rape during that time. The same amount as false accusations by the feminists.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 04:29 AM
1

This woman hating pops up mostly when lunatic entitled feminists weaponize sexual assault allegations to destroy and exploit men, usually because she's trying to control and boss the man around and he won't let her. A casual hook up becomes rape when the woman thinks that night of sex was to be the beginning of her fairy tale romance but it was just sex for the guy, or in this case, Kesha signed a business contract she wants to get out of, and instead of honoring it, she maliciously and dishones…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 08:43 AM
0

Please find me a man who feels an accusation of a crime toward a woman should automatically be believed and half the world support the man.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 01:07 AM
18

I hope he bankrupts this cunt. You know what will get people believing accusations of rape and sexual assault? When entitled horrible cunts stop making false accusations, but forever now there is no risk, nothing to lose by making a false accusation. You start punishing false accusations, you'll see fewer false accusations, and then most of the accusations you hear will have more legitimacy to them.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 06:24 AM
0

that just teases them, no real bashing
/r/MensRights26/02/16 06:16 AM
1

It's perpetuation of rape and sex assault hysteria. Painting men in that light. You'll never see an article joking about women studying how to improve their false accusation speeches.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 04:12 PM
1

This perpetuation of rape and sex assault hysteria.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 04:08 PM
0

Very true! Running draws attention and implies fleeing, escaping - why is that guy fleeing! He's trying to escape... from that little girl! Omg little girl did this man rape you? Oh no she must be traumatized, little girl, blink if this man raped you ... ... ... ... ... She blinked! Off to jail with you pervert!!
/r/MensRights25/02/16 12:05 AM
1

If a young girl was standing in the middle of the street with a car about to run into her, or if a young girl is in any sort of trouble, or if I just see a young girl in public, I turn around and run away as fast as I possibly can.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 04:42 AM
1

This is the concern I am talking about. All these behaviors that are pretty common amongst men are being vilified by feminism. That's why all these women are having this idea that if a man and a woman are going to interact with each other, the man has to accomodate the woman's social style. I'm sick of this, I want to be myself and I feel like I'm being fake around women because I essentially have to talk to them with kid gloves. I can't call them on their bullshit because then I look weird - I …
/r/MensRights22/02/16 02:14 AM
1

Agreed, although there might be some traits found more in boys than girls, and those are what I'm interested in.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 02:11 AM
1

I understand that and I'm not taking any issue, but what I want to figure out what the landscape is like for other men across society regarding social acceptance/criticism of masculine traits.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 10:07 PM
1

Is sarcastic humor considered to be "masculine"? I don't know, either way she doesn't seem to appreciate it as much. That's a good line though.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:49 PM
2

I can be a very competitive person (especially playing sports), but I think and try to ALWAYS treat other people with respect, I try to be gracious winner and a gracious loser, I don't talk trash, I don't gloat, I play fair, I'm honest, I don't cheat. My girlfriend has criticized me for this saying that it is rude to make people feel like losers - she buys into the idea that everyone should get a trophy. I tell her, just because someone "loses" at basketball, or is proven wrong in an argument do…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:33 PM
3

Absolutely, and I'm not surprised (and it's very scary) that we think it's within the realm of possibility for "sane" people functioning in society without supervision to believe this statement and be able to reconcile it logically.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 04:45 AM
-12

I believe survivors and even victims, even if they are completely fabricating or lying about their sexual assault stories.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 11:08 PM
66

So is Kesha guilty of perjury if she went back on her word? Will she be on trial or punished for perjury? Or is there a "hysterical woman clause" that says because (woman are feeble and hysterical that can't form coherent memories /s) in matters of sexual assault, prior recorded statements are subject to correction?
/r/MensRights20/02/16 11:06 PM
1

It isn't good enough and it will never be with them, they are just a bunch of clowns alienating themselves from society every day as the world keeps seeing how crazy and out of touch they are.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 10:58 PM
1

This is extremely dangerous and concerning from me. I am seriously afraid that someone would allow this idea to be published (is this a published news source)? Seriously afraid that there is a movement behind this.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 03:46 AM
2

It exposes what happens when we lax due process
/r/MensRights19/02/16 06:12 AM
2

To Kill a Mockingbird. Atticus Finch was a rape apologist. SMH
/r/MensRights17/02/16 07:29 PM
1

These "court documents" are advocacy, they are biased, they are the prosecutions versions of the facts.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 08:11 AM
-1

This is a SJW wet dream. Shaun King, the author the NY Daily News article is BLM advocate, and he's just upset that there exist racist people unfairly criticizing Cam. Some people (black and white) think Cam is arrogant, some think he's just being confident, some are racist and hate him because he's black. This article will now supposedly put things in perspective for those racist people and realize the unfair way they were treating Cam because Peyton is horrible person. And what a perfect oppor…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 08:11 PM
5

"Women are constantly patting themselves on the back on how difficult their lives are and no one corrects em, cuz they wanna fuck em" - Bill Burr
/r/MensRights13/02/16 10:13 PM
0

I wonder how much they spoiled her and gave her her sense of entitlement. If they taught her that regardless of her beauty she is not entitled to anything and she is responsible for her own wealth and well-being, she'd probably still be alive.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:33 PM
0

In their second year together, Nina said Sam had changed. He became different and Nina said Sam would want her to pay her way more but still live the expensive lifestyle and she struggled. Good riddance.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:30 PM
2

This is going to be horrible for companies and employees. Employees will now be under the microscope, they will have to formally count every minute someone works. In salaried positions where there aren't time cards or time sheets, everyone in the office knows who comes in early and who stays late. This creates further costs and over head to collect data to justify pay.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:20 PM
200

That's the problem, too many men are tolerant and self-sufficient. They don't want to make noise, they don't want to disrupt society, bother people, annoy people. They want to go about their business being constructive and productive. Men need to learn to speak up when they see bigotry.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:56 PM
17

Feminist Entitlement. Everyday I am more and more surprised how outrageous it gets.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 08:37 PM
1

This is so sad, I'm sorry for you man, your ex wife is crazy and vindictive, trying to find any and every reason to be a pain in the ass. I feel for you, hopefully she can get some therapy or counseling to stop being so hateful and create useless pain for others. You gave the kids a haircut and this is how she acts.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 03:45 AM
1

It's just so enjoyable watching feminism collapse under the weight of it's own logical inconsistencies and blatant sexism.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 03:33 AM
1

Exactly! I think men want to be respectful and chivalrous, it's just unless you're a billionaire in a thousand dollar suit doing it, you're a "creep".
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/16 02:12 PM
28

I'm going to get downvoted, but I'll give it a shot. I sense some entitlement in her, but I also think she wants to balance it out. I think, and hope, that she's trying to say men and women have different roles - she is holding women accountable for the fact they act like they don't need men. I have no problem being "chivalrous" to women if they pay the respect back.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/02/16 04:24 PM
-4

I like this idea of rebranding. Theoretically, I think all MRAs and Feminists truely want and believe the same things - equality. I read recently something that really stood out to me - that the entire movement and ideology pursuing gender neutral language and thinking... is Feminism. This just blows my mind. Shouldn't your brand reflect your goals? Why would you assign an explicitly feminine label to a movement dedicated to gender neutrality?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:30 PM
1

I don't think MRAs oppose the empowerment of women, in fact I think we categorically support it. I think there needs to be a distinction made between empowerment and patronizing with special treatment. A lot of what I see in feminism today underestimates women, telling them they do not have agency and responsibility over some of their decisions, that they are not capable of succeeding if not given special treatment and consideration. Also, empowerment of anyone is not empowerment if it involves …
/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:36 PM
1

Could someone please post the link to the study (not this article which is a commentary) to /r/feminism? I would but I already got banned from /r/feminism for saying that gender stereotyping and generalizing all men based on a few personal experiences is counter productive to gender relations.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 11:05 PM
3

It is a stupid law suit, but that's the problem. So many women engage in these stupid and frivolous law suits and complaints. Men for the most part do not engage in this frivolous behavior and unfortunately society is making them pay for it. The only way to reverse this social current punishing men is for them to speak up and complain just as much as women do.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 10:06 PM
1

I'm a man (not that it should matter) and I grew up with the belief that physical relationships were a lot more fulfilling when there was an emotional and mental connection as well. I'm in my 30s now, but in my 20s I participated (briefly) in this hookup culture, and it didn't take too long for me to lose interest. Are we really surprised when we engage in a shallow, superficial, fleeting treatment of life that our resulting experiences end up being.... shallow and superficial? This is the unfor…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:37 PM
1

Whenever I hear anyone, man, woman, non-binary, gay, straight, bi, white, black, tall, short, etc... make categorical judgements on an entire sex, race, demographic, etc... based on their personal observations and experiences, I automatically dismiss that person as childish and narcissistic with an unhealthy sense of entitlement. Grow up, reality and expectations of life sometimes (most of the time) don't match up. Sometimes, people are losers. In my personal experience, people who suck at life …
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:26 PM
1

I appreciate your honesty, I do have a long way to go.
/r/askTRP15/12/15 03:48 PM
1

I decide on me. You decide your level of involvement. I like that. I appreciate your honesty, I've got a long way to go.
/r/askTRP15/12/15 03:48 PM
1

I have to admit I'm not good at "nipping in the bud", I try too hard to make things work, and I try too hard to accommodate other people.
/r/askTRP14/12/15 10:35 PM
2

Besides allowing it - am I doing anything else sick?
/r/askTRP14/12/15 09:53 PM
2

I do have a pretty good job - software engineer with 6 figure salary. I think you are right. I'm ready for her to walk out, I do love her, but I'm just about fed up with her criticism and control.
/r/askTRP14/12/15 08:22 PM
1

The result is you gave her your balls on a silver platter. That's pretty much it. I'm willing to walk, and I realized something big over the weekend. We got back from a dinner where she was worse than usual, and I told her how I thought she went overboard. She got mad at me for bringing it up, essentially using her emotions as a weapon to make me seem like I'm the bad guy. She kept saying (and in the past it's always worked for) she wants to go home, and I say "no babe, stay, let's work it out",…
/r/askTRP14/12/15 08:06 PM
3

It sure does feel abusive at times.
/r/askTRP14/12/15 06:27 PM
2

Maybe I'm misusing omega - what I'm saying is I'm plain and simple a bitch who cares too much what she thinks. I'm the bottom of the barrel, definitely not an alpha, a beta is too generous - I figured omega was the lowest.
/r/askTRP14/12/15 06:26 PM
1

I'm not even a beta, I'm an omega.
/r/askTRP14/12/15 06:17 PM
2

My favorite thing about this debate is how Wendy spoke in a very clear, straightforward manner, while Valenti sounded like a high school drama queen. Just pay attention to how many times she says "umm" and "like". "Ummm, so like... thank you for like having me speak, and like, um, rape is totally not cool, and ummm, like, ya know?"
/r/MensRights11/12/15 06:43 PM
11

It's sad when you consider someone like Jessica Valenti a "prominent feminist". It's clear this woman is delusional with a child-like, impulsive manner. The moment someone starts using emotional reasoning to make conclusions, they've already dismissed themselves from the real world adult conversation.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 03:52 PM
10

The odds of jail are small, but the odds for character assassination in the court of public opinion are absolute.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 03:28 AM
2

As Cathy Young outlined in this article, and also seen in many other surveys, the term "false promises" could be considered a reason why someone thought they were raped. It appears this doesn't allow for someone to change their mind - something we see prevalent in the definition of not giving consent. If I have sex with a girl, and afterwards I change my mind that I'm interested in dating her, am I now accused of rape? I feel like this is what happened with Mattress Girl.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 07:06 PM
1

I think I can see how you interpreted that when I said "there's no reason to listen to ... [radical] feminism". Of course we should be aware of their socially destructive machinations. I'm saying there's no reason to listen to them in the capacity of trying to talk to them. Of course we should definitely publicly address the issues they are causing and affecting with their reckless and selfish rhetoric, thinking, and behavior; but this comes in the form of dialogue with policy makers that are be…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 05:02 AM
1

Yet these organizations won't allow any opposition in any dialog. So what is the one problem with my statement? It seems you agree then. I was obviously using hyperbole in my original comment, but it seems we both agree that engaging in productive dialogue with fanatical feminists is impossible.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:33 AM
1

"Women are from Venus, Men are from Hell" - C.H.S. No matter what a man does - he's vile scum. There's no reason to listen to or engage in dialogue with feminism unless you are a self-loathing masochist.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:14 PM
6

Close the revenue gap! If you want to get paid as much, generate as much revenue! How is it possible that SO many adults live in such denial? How is it possible to be so delusional? Is there some bottomless pot of gold a group of super powerful white men are hiding and guarding, and due to their sexist misogyny they only decide to give the men more? Or perhaps the governing body for your sport can only pay you as much money as you generate for them? Basic arithmetic feminists!
/r/MensRights03/12/15 04:05 PM
2

Exactly, and they allow themselves to do that. Essentially the above justifies any behavior as long as they view it an "important objective". Well, it seems pretty clear that to the OCR and Title IX that the systematic oppression and denial of rights to boys and men has been an important objective of theirs lately.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 03:01 PM
1

If a student is incapacitated (through her own fault), and another student has sex with her, I agree it's rape. If you offer someone drugs or alcohol and what you offer them is not the same thing as what you tell them it is, and are thus incapacitated, because of the example you give where a drink is drugged - yes it's rape. Now, as you say she elaborates this statement on examples. The way her statement "He might incapacitate her through drugs or alcohol (or both) to make her more vulnerable." …
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:03 PM
0

The dystopian utopia.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 02:36 AM
1

In some cases, yes, which they also mentioned as another example alcohol drugged with roofies. She also explicitly stated drugs OR alcohol or combinations - therefore situations where alcohol exclusively was consumed without roofies or any other drug were also worded as methods in which the driving factor of the incapacitation was those "frat boys".
/r/MensRights01/12/15 02:36 AM
2

Absolutely, I just fear that given all this hype and hysteria that some of these additional accusers coming out of the woodwork are being intellectually dishonest by taking things out of context.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:53 PM
2

With the unfair advantage of Hillary being a woman to garner women votes, he still has to play some politics to not completely alienate the woman vote.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:44 PM
1

I personally believe that men or women aren't inherently better at any particular academic discipline, I believe the statement should be "what's wrong about women generally preferring literary topics?"
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:30 PM
2

It matters in assessing credibility and evidence that a trauma victim might not be able to recall facts in a linear way, as the administrators may expect her to. Gaps in an account of rape do not necessarily imply a lack of credibility. Rather, the victim’s account and its traumatic effects should be considered in the wider context of the case. Hey dumbass, don't you think the fear of [unjustly] going to prison for possibly for the rest of your life and being repeatedly raped in the ass might ca…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:07 PM
22

Just a quote I can't believe Harvard Law Review would allow: He might incapacitate her through drugs or alcohol (or both) to make her more vulnerable. Attention women, you have agency over yourselves, if someone offers you drugs or alcohol, you have the right to refuse. If you accept drugs or alcohol at a frat house, you are incapacitating yourself. EDIT: Also forget the fact that the "preponderance of the evidence standard" goes against our fundamental legal process. And the inherent bias in th…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 06:24 PM
2

Something I think that is very nebulous about this whole ordeal is the sort of culture involved with porn stars. Anyone can be raped, of course. Anyone could be sexually assaulted. Sometimes cultural implications play an (actual) bigger role in the sort of behavior that is acceptable. I am not a porn performer, or have had any exposure to that environment, but I would have to say that among porn stars, very sexually liberal people, a phrase like "would you sniff my balls?" would take on a very d…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:31 PM
-1

The set describes, "Rights, procedures, and due process". And I agree, emotional reasoning isn't a right, but that is what radical feminists want, they want the right to use emotional reasoning to justify evidence and claims. then I would assume that you mean that in rape and sexual assault cases, the accused suddenly has no rights, and emotional reasoning is taken seriously by judges Yes, exactly my point, this is what radical feminism wants - as you are seeing with the Stoya allegations now, a…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:05 PM
7

The amount of sheer ignorance and stupidity is just baffling. Just the delusional thinking and intellectual dishonesty that goes on is beyond unbelievable. Fact checking and critical thought are irrelevant. Where does one learn (and actually believe) that rapists were not convicted because the accuser "was a slut", or "dress was too short"?
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:45 PM
0

You're right, it doesn't, the rights of the accused should be relevant in adjudication of all crimes. And I also think emotional reasoning does not belong in the legal system at all.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:25 PM
-1

Are you familiar with Venn diagrams? They are not arithmetic operations, they regard set theory. The way to read this is that regarding ALL crimes, rights of the accuser are always valid. Regarding specifically rape and sexual assault, the usage of emotional reasoning is included, but the rights of the accused are not important, not part of the process, irrelevant. Finally, in crimes other than rape and sexual assault (murder, theft, tax evasion, etc...), the accused are allowed to have rights, …
/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:40 PM
-1

Could you expand on "it's not failure to support false accusers that hurts real victims" - I'm not sure I completely understand the full meaning and all the implications of that statement. Maybe it's the wording, I'd say failing to support false accusers helps real victims - support should be given only to accusers you know to be true.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:40 AM
-1

I made it.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:33 AM
1

I'm not sure what about my original comment went against their sidebar. What would be the appropriate subreddit to make this post.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:39 AM
1

There's something wrong with this girl - at the very least she's a sociopath. Read her other post about saying you should tell someone if you don't want a 2nd date. All she does is blabber about how boring her date was and how interesting and funny she is. Right, because people who are interesting and funny usually have to go on the internet to let everyone know how interesting and funny the are - doesn't reek at all of pathetic loser.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:35 AM
2

I guess, and I feel a lot of us are coming to this conclusion, that usually when someone censors you they know that there is no need for dialogue and conversation - you're right, but they'd rather just continue living in their made up world.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter