notheanix Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
6	Obama finally working on a program specifically to help young minority(black) boys --- People ignoring all the exclusive women and girls programs cry afoul. He isn't being an idiot. Your pithy statement is ambiguous.	/r/MensRights	19/06/14 12:49 PM
1	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” You still have no evidence of secret lists, just claims. The reporter of that article has never seen such a list, just as you have not. In fact the doctor in question hasn't given this secret list to anyone.	/r/MensRights	04/05/14 01:17 PM
1	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” Note I gave several examples of problems reported over many years, and nationwide. No, you simply repeated your claims. Of those that you listed, the Fox News article was only national in the sense that that specific administrator in question. They are not claiming that her problems are national. More, over THEY HAVE NOT SEEN THE LIST. This is not evidence. They are simply repeating the claim. The Dailyshow claims are neither, secret, related to healthcare, or exclusive to MEN. Are women vets wh…	/r/MensRights	04/05/14 01:16 PM
1	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” I guess you can't admit when you are wrong.	/r/MensRights	03/05/14 05:07 PM
1	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” No, unless you or someone else can provide evidence that they are. You are begging the question here. Read the conversation again. There is nothing in either of your links that supports "secret lists" for Men. The secret lists, whatever you may call them, are a fact. His assertion is circular. What is his evidence? Sharon Helman, director of the Phoenix Veterans Affairs Health Care system, is accused with other management officials of keeping a fake waiting list that made it appear sick veterans…	/r/MensRights	03/05/14 07:01 AM
1	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” I'm not sure how it isn't. I pointed out how the distribution wasn't uniform I took what you said to mean the amounts of money were not uniform. I.e not every vet uses x amount of money. Ultimately "underfunded" is usually a political term, not an economic one, despite its use of numbers. People will often firm using its funds in a way they don't think is the best by having different priorities. Which is one reason why I have been backpedaling.	/r/MensRights	02/05/14 10:32 PM
0	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” You're still using per capita/per vet statistics, which the distribution of spending in each set is not the same, making for an improper comparison. Yes, you are right there, but your initial statement isn't in agreement with what you are saying now. I'm saying it's irrelevant what other sources that are not as comparable-at least by the metrics used-have for funding cannot tell us whether it something else is underfunded or not. Yes, I agree. Total expenditure is also irrelevant without a prope…	/r/MensRights	02/05/14 09:30 PM
0	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” I'm pointing out the flaws in your argument. You can be wrong without me proposing an alternative. I get that, but you weren't actually pointing out the parts that were wrong. The "per vet" thing wasn't the wrong part. I.e. comparing average medical spending in the more healthy general population to the medical spending of the VA on the less healthy population of veterans. That's not a function of under-funding. That's a function of "reducing redundancies" in their style of administration. It's …	/r/MensRights	02/05/14 09:12 PM
1	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” Also, nice anecdote.	/r/MensRights	02/05/14 08:06 PM
-1	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” You're naive if you think that's remotely uniformly distributed. I don't think it is, and my argument isn't contingent on that. Read my other post. Further, pointing to a higher number=/=underfunded. It is also based on those long waits that everyone is talking about. You're kind of doing math, but barely. If you are going to make an argument, make one.	/r/MensRights	02/05/14 08:06 PM
-1	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” I see you deleted a major portion of your initial reply. So a separate phone number and a separate waiting room are not evidence of segregation? I guess we should make all restrooms unisex. Cause that would be segregation... Your question is not just about segregation, but also: an indication that this is not merely bad service for all vets, but an attempt to segregate and provide better service for female vets only? An act of segregation in itself does not make the second question answer as tru…	/r/MensRights	02/05/14 07:08 PM
-1	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” Even if you look at the expenditures per unique patient that number averages $9840. That number now only includes people receiving medical treatment. The PP expenses for the general population include both those who receive treatment and those who do not. Considering that Vets have more health problems, I don't think enough is being spent on their treatment.	/r/MensRights	02/05/14 05:58 PM
-2	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” My question is, are the special waiting rooms for female vets (link above), the exclusive female only vet call in numbers[2] , and the secret orders to destroy medical test requests[3] and the exclusive gathering of performance data by the White House Council on Women and Girls for female vets, and not male vets, an indication that this is not merely bad service for all vets, but an attempt to segregate and provide better service for female vets only? No, unless you or someone else can provide e…	/r/MensRights	02/05/14 05:42 PM
0	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” That translates to 6134 dollars a year per veteran in this country (There are 22,658,000 vets). Considering that the VA is both dealing with Baby boomer vets and young Vets from. That includes Compensation and pensions. Which account for the majority of expenses In 2013 56 billion was spent on on medical care. Meaning 2471 dollars per vet. Expenditures in the US per person_per_capita) are $8508. Do the math. Considering that Vets are more likely to have severe health issues and that you have a d…	/r/MensRights	02/05/14 05:41 PM
-3	Are only male vets subject to die on secret waiting lists? “Our Women’s Health Center offers multiple services including a separate waiting room for women.” Seriously, what the fuck are you talking about? It is a god damned women's health center in a VA. Why would a man be waiting there? WHY? This is the third time I have seen you post a link where you attribute some grave conspiracy to innocent content. There is nothing in either of your links that supports "secret lists" for Men. As for the "secret waiting lists," thing. The only potentially malevolent about them is the "waiting" part. No medical facility would have public waiting lists. Have you …	/r/MensRights	02/05/14 04:38 PM
2	National Organization for Women Workshop Guidelines support women's equality, but prevent any discussion of the advantages of women and girls, or any discussion of male victims of domestic violence (i Can you name one prominet male speaker for women's right to be pro-abortion? Obama. I bet you can find a prominet pro-life woman speaker easier than an prominet pro-abortion man. That is not the same question, and I honestly can't name one of the top of my head. This is a failure of feminism for women and men, as they turn off allies and don't address the male genders issues, one they don't seem intent to change. As seen in this very thread, they would be accused of co-opting those issues to gar…	/r/MensRights	12/04/14 06:41 PM
3	National Organization for Women Workshop Guidelines support women's equality, but prevent any discussion of the advantages of women and girls, or any discussion of male victims of domestic violence (i I think we both know that feminism is a moralizing, intellectually bankrupt, and hypocritical ideology. My problem with this post is that nothing in OP's post supports his claims in his title. Specifically that the guidelines "prevent discussion." There are plenty (I mean a seriously large amount) of instances of feminists engaging in censorship and disrupting discussion. So even if OP is right, there is no need for this example since it relies on supposition. If I were running a men's rights wo…	/r/MensRights	12/04/14 05:39 PM
23	National Organization for Women Workshop Guidelines support women's equality, but prevent any discussion of the advantages of women and girls, or any discussion of male victims of domestic violence (i I didn't see anything that "prevent[s] discussion" about these issues. All that is there are guidelines that insist that women and woc be the focus of any workshop. Being that it is the National Organization of Women, I wouldn't expect that Men's issues would be highlighted in any of their activities.	/r/MensRights	12/04/14 04:42 PM
1	Internet Porn harmless for adolescents, sex researchers find. Adolescent boys know how to responsibly dose their porn consumption. Porn does not harm their real world sexual behavior, might even incre http://rebeccajorgensen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/71612135.pdf Try google scholar. It took me about a minute and a half to find it for free without a subscription.	/r/MensRights	12/04/14 05:16 AM
2	Internet Porn harmless for adolescents, sex researchers find. Adolescent boys know how to responsibly dose their porn consumption. Porn does not harm their real world sexual behavior, might even incre Here is a link to your study. I don't know why nigglereddit can't find it. http://rebeccajorgensen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/71612135.pdf Edit: Maybe he doesn't know how to use google scholar?	/r/MensRights	12/04/14 02:29 AM
2	Female Philadelphia Cop 'Stops and Frisks' African American Teen, Literally Destroying His Genitals For the grip strength - here you go: http://www.topendsports.com/testing/norms/handgrip.htm Now, remember that I'm claiming only grip strength. Injuries have happened in weight rooms with these size weights, but they're also usually falling at an acceleration close to that of gravity, thus having more momentum, and thus more energy than a hand's grip. http://www.topendsports.com/testing/tests/handgrip.htm I'll pass on 55-60 lbs of force being exerted on my testicles. Not mention that that only c…	/r/MensRights	23/01/14 01:27 AM
4	Female Philadelphia Cop 'Stops and Frisks' African American Teen, Literally Destroying His Genitals What literature? he should know that it's physically impossible to fracture a testicle because fractures only happen to bones It testicular fracture is an actual thing, but it is different than a rupture. I tend to agree that if the gentleman was otherwise healthy, few women or men could conjure up this Hulk-like strength to do this. Added to this is that the victim's pants were probably on the whole time and remained unripped. The officer likely would not have adequate grip strength, or leverag…	/r/MensRights	22/01/14 11:39 PM
26	Female Philadelphia Cop 'Stops and Frisks' African American Teen, Literally Destroying His Genitals Just so you know, this guy isn't a doctor. He is a racist, sexist troll. Black people are intellectually inferior as a group. If you don't understand that, you don't understand statistics. Every conceivable measure of intellect, blacks fall behind. They also have more testosterone which makes them more prone to violence and rape. How come white men never rape black women. How come black men rape about 30,000 white women per year?	/r/MensRights	22/01/14 11:01 PM
5	Female Philadelphia Cop 'Stops and Frisks' African American Teen, Literally Destroying His Genitals Note that his anecdote is about a fracture and not a rupture (as was described in the article). A rupture and a fracture are different. So we have an non-contributing and unsupported claim in his first comment. Then his second comment is based on him being a doctor and then describing an injury that is different than the one in the article. I am all for reddiquette, but has comments are bad, regardless of the position he is holding. If you don't want to be labeled a "troll," then don't talk like…	/r/MensRights	22/01/14 10:55 PM
9	Female Philadelphia Cop 'Stops and Frisks' African American Teen, Literally Destroying His Genitals I have no opinion on this subreddit either way. Then why are you here?	/r/MensRights	22/01/14 10:22 PM
2	Undergrad mature student (female) asking Reddit family for help in questionnaire research. I am trying to display evidence that men are negatively focused on and discriminated in allegations of sexual harm against children. Please fill out my questionnaire and I will be very grateful. Happy 2014. That isn't true. You should be trying to disprove your hypthesis. Your job as a researcher is NOT to do provide research to support anything. Then you may as well count grains of sand on the beach. The job of a researcher is to examine the data and report what you find, objectively, without any investment to any aspect or portion of the data. Seriously, since when did hypothesis testing get removed from science?	/r/MensRights	03/01/14 03:04 AM
4	I had no idea MRAs were so hated pick up artist	/r/MensRights	20/12/13 03:23 AM
5	"Why did sillymod remove the Occidental College post?" Let me tell you why. Many SRSers call themselves Shitlords. So do most of the people on on /r/tumblrinaction	/r/MensRights	18/12/13 01:51 PM
29	Feminists at Occidental College created an online form to anonymously report rape/sexual assault. You just fill out a form and the person is called into the office on a rape charge. The "victim" never has to prove anything or reveal their identity. Except that Jimmy Russels is a second year bio major at Occidental College.	/r/MensRights	17/12/13 02:04 PM
52	“A drunk woman can’t make correct decisions, but apparently, drunk men turn into Einstein when they get drunk.” As others have pointed out, consent can be revoked at any point. You could have a notarized document stating consent and it still wouldn't be evidence of consent (beyond the moment it was signed).	/r/MensRights	30/11/13 03:49 AM
25	Essentially how it goes. I don't think that is the point of the comic. Rather its point is that dissent on certain issues is being treated as if it could only stem from hate for the group most effected. This happens all the time where an issue is pushed to the forefront to polarize an electorate. "Haven't you heard? Republicans hate women."	/r/MensRights	11/11/13 04:26 PM
10	Rape Culture Explained in Gif's by a Smart Girl [X-post from r/TumblrInAction] Concern trolling and accusations of it have been around a lot longer than reddit or your "manosphere" thing.	/r/MensRights	29/10/13 12:21 PM
3	Why is mensrights not allowed to be linked to r/bestof, yet their current top post is about a woman being sexually assaulted? Shouldn't the people's votes decide? I don't know what your goal is, but you aren't going to win people over by saying things like that.	/r/MensRights	24/08/13 05:12 AM
2	Why the use of "privilege" by SJWs is annoying. ancap "natural inequality" You misspelled privilege	/r/MensRights	22/08/13 08:47 PM
-1	Innocent man stabbed in the head by screaming woman who mistook him for someone that "threatened" her with rape. /r/mensrights is falling into sjw territory. It is going to adopt "the matriarchy" as the cause of all of society's problems if recent trends continue.	/r/MensRights	21/08/13 03:51 AM
3	Thunderf00t: PZ Myers accuses Shermer of rape The burn from Mr. Deity was outstanding. I had no idea he was still around.	/r/MensRights	19/08/13 05:21 AM
2	Washington Post: A high divorce rate means it’s time to try ‘wedleases’: These generally create a turnkey divorce in which the wife wins child custody in advance. Why do you think wedlease proponents don't have intent? Because you haven't shown me evidence of any intent. Why do you think wedlease proposals in Mexico cannot be compared to wedlease proposals in the US? Because they have different legislators, different laws, different cultures, and one is a developing nation and the other isn't. Do you think this proposal does not cover child custody? If so, why? No. I said: if you are going to change marriage contracts you will of course have to include pr…	/r/MensRights	16/08/13 09:47 AM
8	Washington Post: A high divorce rate means it’s time to try ‘wedleases’: These generally create a turnkey divorce in which the wife wins child custody in advance. I'm not going to pretend that I like this idea, but there are some issues with your response. This is an editorial - an opinion piece. The amount of power this guy would have in acting on this idea is minuscule. You are reading to much into what "The messiness of divorce." At worst the statement is vague, which is to be expected from most opinion pieces. Editorials are usually shit. If you are going to attribute intent to wedlease proponents, you should explain how you know instead of just leavi…	/r/MensRights	16/08/13 08:18 AM
9	Washington Post: A high divorce rate means it’s time to try ‘wedleases’: These generally create a turnkey divorce in which the wife wins child custody in advance. The article doesn't mention custody at all, OP.	/r/MensRights	16/08/13 07:54 AM
1	PZ Myers retracts rape allegation post (and this post). Tries to have one more final dig at Michael Shermer's character. Now you are getting it.	/r/MensRights	13/08/13 06:12 PM
2	PZ Myers retracts rape allegation post (and this post). Tries to have one more final dig at Michael Shermer's character. No, atheism is about not believing in gods. Anything else is incidental. The rest of what you are saying still fails to acknowledge atheists are human and therefore social. Read one of my earlier posts. There is no guarantee that a person will be rational about everything. Nor is there a guarantee that a rational opinion is held for rational reasons.	/r/MensRights	13/08/13 06:01 PM
5	PZ Myers retracts rape allegation post (and this post). Tries to have one more final dig at Michael Shermer's character. Humans are social creatures and validation is comforting.	/r/MensRights	13/08/13 05:15 PM
3	PZ Myers retracts rape allegation post (and this post). Tries to have one more final dig at Michael Shermer's character. Well, one could argue that anti-theism is a logical consequence of being pro-reason, but that's another discussion. It can be, but my point is that it doesn't have to be. After all, a dog does not believe in god (probably). It could instead be a response to a culture you do not like, or in favor of something contradicts it. For instance, a Christian believes in his God but not a Hindu god. He does not believe in the Hindu god due to a deeply held understanding of logic, but instead he doesn't be…	/r/MensRights	13/08/13 07:00 AM
1	If you get furious about... Check my edit. I hoped it went through before you responded, but I guess it didn't. Also, as beyond all reasonable doubt and that is the point, science doesn't do that. It doesn't even do it beyond a preponderance of a doubt. It suggests, it is supported by evidence, it is consitent with, it is in line with the theory. I wholly believe that the public missuses science and the word prove when it uses them together. I think the difference is significant enough that it is worth arguing. There is a …	/r/MensRights	13/08/13 06:54 AM
4	PZ Myers retracts rape allegation post (and this post). Tries to have one more final dig at Michael Shermer's character. I haven't, but it looks interesting. I would be hesitant to say that they aren't concerned with making the world a better place. It is simply too easy to discount someone as narcissistic, immoral, shallow, or idiots. P.Z. Myers likely thinks he is doing the right thing. I think Salman Rushdie recently hit it on the head. I do think that one of the characteristics of our age is the growth of this culture of offendedness. It has to do with the rise of identity politics, where you're invited to def…	/r/MensRights	13/08/13 06:39 AM
1	PZ Myers retracts rape allegation post (and this post). Tries to have one more final dig at Michael Shermer's character. I think being anti-theist instead of say pro-reason left it open to becoming this atheism+ thing we see today. I also don't see social justice being pro anything either. I spent 2 years studying under a philosophy professor that was a feminist and critical theorist. Those philosophies were anti-male, anti-female, anti-white, anti-science. His philosophies were rarely constructive, and when they were they would have degraded everyone involved. However, I respect your opinion, and I want to think …	/r/MensRights	13/08/13 06:38 AM
0	If you get furious about... But if you want to be more concrete, then give me an example of a fact that isn't true by definition I doubt (think) therefore I am. - Paraphrasing Descartes. This is of course irrelevant. I am only pointing out that there is no common conclusion on a universal doubt or whether something can be truly known. This is not a settled issue in the past or today. You and your friends are free to use the word "proof" in its most rigorous sense in casual conversation if you want, but what I'm saying is t…	/r/MensRights	13/08/13 05:57 AM
17	PZ Myers retracts rape allegation post (and this post). Tries to have one more final dig at Michael Shermer's character. Richard Dawkins isn't in America.	/r/MensRights	13/08/13 05:30 AM
0	If you get furious about... If you're willing to be sufficiently pedantic and entertain sufficiently ridiculous explanations, nothing is proven, and nothing ever will be. Some philosophers and mathematicians would disagree with that. Look up Descartes. Nothing is unquestionable. Which is why in normal conversation, we do not hold anything to those standards. And I know a few people I work with and have gone to school with that would disagree with that. Not everyone is you, stop being so self centered. only true if you use …	/r/MensRights	13/08/13 05:12 AM
18	PZ Myers retracts rape allegation post (and this post). Tries to have one more final dig at Michael Shermer's character. I gave up on it years ago when I realized that atheism and religion were largely irrelevant. Reason and critical thinking are what had attracted me to atheism and its proponents. As time went on I realized that one could hold irrational ideas but not be an irrational person, and conversely, to hold rational ideas but not be a rational person. Appropriately enough, it was P.Z. Myers that convinced me of that. P.Z. Myers held many rational ideas, but his arguments and behavior were irrational. Nam…	/r/MensRights	13/08/13 04:57 AM
0	If you get furious about... That is the thing, though. When people hear that "science proved" something some people take the statement as absolute fact. There are a lot of people let down by our public education system that do not know the difference. Even in my philosophy classes and intro science classes, people would make these statements. The rest of my social science and humanities were even worse. The difference is huge and it needs to be pointed out. Even if you think the general case is pedantic, when the OP says s…	/r/MensRights	13/08/13 04:38 AM
-2	If you get furious about... Keep fighting the good fight.	/r/MensRights	13/08/13 01:52 AM
1	If you get furious about... I'm not sure, but I too would like to know. OP did mention something about it being from a Facebook page so maybe it is that.	/r/MensRights	12/08/13 07:57 PM
2	If you get furious about... the words "scientifically proven" it sets off my bullshit meter Not to mention that science never proves things and never seeks to. It puts out a hypothesis and then tries to falsify it. When the hypothesis is falsifiable but fails to be falsified it moves on to theory. Never ever ever, do scientists say they have proved something (unless they are dealing with math).	/r/MensRights	12/08/13 07:53 PM
2	Atheism+, Skepchick, FtB feminists going all out in attempt to destroy the skeptic movement: Ben Radford and physicist Lawrence Krauss accused of sex assault, Bill Nye accused of harassment, DJ Grothe accused of misogyny, Michael Shermer ACCUSED OF RAPE by PZ Myers. This is beyond fucking insane. A lot of people dismiss /r/mensrights in a similar manner by comparing us to redpillers and manhood academy. a shit ton of people there are just sheep A shit ton sounds like a majority.	/r/MensRights	09/08/13 09:56 PM
3	Atheism+, Skepchick, FtB feminists going all out in attempt to destroy the skeptic movement: Ben Radford and physicist Lawrence Krauss accused of sex assault, Bill Nye accused of harassment, DJ Grothe accused of misogyny, Michael Shermer ACCUSED OF RAPE by PZ Myers. This is beyond fucking insane. Then why are the comments on this post in r/atheism being critical of PZ Myers? Hell, the post is even labeled as uncorroborated.	/r/MensRights	09/08/13 07:58 PM
3	"Women attempt suicide more than men"... no, they don't, sayeth the CDC Thanks for posting this sonja_newcomb, it looks like a good read.	/r/MensRights	27/07/13 04:19 AM
5	"Women attempt suicide more than men"... no, they don't, sayeth the CDC Threatening to kill yourself is not a sign of narcissism. That is unless that narcissism has depression associated with it, which can be caused by the narcissist's fantasy being broken. More likely, suicidal threats and frequent ideation would be associated Borderline Personality Disorder. While BPD is more frequently found in women than in men, I don't believe that has anything to do with your conclusion about teenage girls. Also, men are more frequently diagnosed with narcissistic personality …	/r/MensRights	27/07/13 04:16 AM
1	Lulu, the new “rate him” app, allows its exclusively female users to access profiles of men they’re interested in through info and photos that have been anonymously and secretly uploaded from Facebook by its other users. Tastes like purple	/r/MensRights	19/06/13 07:35 PM
1	Colbert Report 6/12/2013 - Daniel Bergner on "What Women Want" Pretty high. Also, that is math which deals in proofs which can be arrived at by logic. Science does not prove things and is reliant on both logic and evidence.	/r/MensRights	12/06/13 11:13 PM
1	Colbert Report 6/12/2013 - Daniel Bergner on "What Women Want" Consensus not required. It is for me. Even when something like those rates of reproduction aren't disputed, the cause and modern relevance of them are. Just so stories used to explain biological phenomena have a long history of being wrong even when they stand up to reason. Typically they fail due to a lack of evidence and instead rely on induction. Which is why I want to know what the scientific consensus is. Not to mention that the book "What Do Women Want" is sensational title and so are his …	/r/MensRights	12/06/13 10:54 PM
5	Colbert Report 6/12/2013 - Daniel Bergner on "What Women Want" It looks interesting, but I wonder what the general scientific consensus is (if there even is one).	/r/MensRights	12/06/13 05:53 PM
2	"Star trek is misogynistic because there's a 2-second clip of a woman in her underwear." And, apparently, because some of the characters were not female. The really scary thing is that this is as clos Unless I am seriously missing something, your links have nothing to do with OP's link. What you posted has nothing to do with this feminist "critic" of the Star Trek movie.	/r/MensRights	23/05/13 09:17 PM
3	"Star trek is misogynistic because there's a 2-second clip of a woman in her underwear." And, apparently, because some of the characters were not female. The really scary thing is that this is as clos I think I missed something here. Are you sure you are replying to the correct post?	/r/MensRights	23/05/13 08:11 PM
2	The Unsafe Sex: Should The World Invest More In Men's Health? A shift in global burden of ill health towards the non-communicable diseases, coupled with changing social norms towards greater gender equality in some societies, could result in the present health outcomes of men increasingly reflected in poor health outcomes of women. In the same way that it makes sense for the health-care sector to join forces with other sectors to address social determinants of health, it would arguably serve the long-term interests of women to join such coalitions too, so …	/r/MensRights	18/05/13 09:19 PM
2	The Unsafe Sex: Should The World Invest More In Men's Health? Few cross-national datasets compare health-care seeking (rather than intervention coverage) for women and men, particularly for the same condition. Evidence from cross-sectional surveys is somewhat contradictory. That women might use health services more frequently than men in many settings is often biased by women's use of health services during their reproductive years. Women's access to care might be limited by gender norms that restrict their autonomy over whether and when to seek care,23 an…	/r/MensRights	18/05/13 09:19 PM
4	The Unsafe Sex: Should The World Invest More In Men's Health? Here is the article http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(13)60253-6/fulltext (which is behind a registration wall) referenced in OP's link. I have posted it below: “Gender is probably the most restricting force in American life” Gloria Steinem (American journalist, social activist and feminist), 2008 “But let me tell you, this gender thing is history.” George HW Bush (former President of the United States of America) Gender is missing from, misunderstood in, and only so…	/r/MensRights	18/05/13 09:18 PM
0	Men, stop doing this to yourselves... Your words speak for themselves, and I think people are beginning to see the kind of person you are. Irrational and of no help to the MRM.	/r/MensRights	09/04/13 05:47 AM
5	Men, stop doing this to yourselves... You called them "sex starved losers," and you said nothing about their commentary. How would this differ from what the OP in my link said? He criticized the commentary and then likened them to "little boys," which you called male shaming. How is referring to sex starved men as losers not male shaming? If you are calling them losers who happen to be sex starved, how does that not shame men who are "sex starved."	/r/MensRights	08/04/13 10:46 PM
12	Men, stop doing this to yourselves... Didn't you call someone out last week for anti-male shaming?	/r/MensRights	08/04/13 09:35 PM
-1	Joe Rogan's been getting slammed over the past couple of weeks. This response sums up everything perfectly. While men and women and whites and blacks all have differences, in GENERAL they are all the same. And in GENERAL, I don't like blacks. There are always exceptions, yes, but not a lot for me. Call me horrible if you'd like, but I'm just a human with an opinion. Also way not to answer any of my questions, and yes I will call you a horrible person.	/r/MensRights	06/04/13 08:04 PM
0	Joe Rogan's been getting slammed over the past couple of weeks. This response sums up everything perfectly. A woman is not the same as a man. They can not be held to the same rules and standards as an adult. As such they can be trying to be around for people who do not have the patience for it. This problem is compounded by the fact the we have a "think of the woman" culture where you are expected to want and adore woman and if you do not you are abnormal and a fag. It is no wonder that some people do not want to associate with woman because of the strain that is placed on them. Is it okay to not like…	/r/MensRights	06/04/13 07:15 PM
1	A credit union in Vancouver, B.C. is advertising this for Women's Day. A simple gender switch, and presto: instant sexism. So these women didn't earn it; it was just given to them?	/r/MensRights	10/03/13 09:41 AM
0	A credit union in Vancouver, B.C. is advertising this for Women's Day. A simple gender switch, and presto: instant sexism. Yeah, I am not exactly sure what I am supposed to be upset about here. Is it not okay to acknowledge women?	/r/MensRights	10/03/13 08:27 AM
17	A credit union in Vancouver, B.C. is advertising this for Women's Day. A simple gender switch, and presto: instant sexism. I really question why I still subscribe to this subreddit. redditor for 0 days	/r/MensRights	10/03/13 08:21 AM
58	Skepchick Rebecca Watson interrupts Imgur founder Alan Schaaf to say that defending Reddit with evidence is "rude" what ever hole she crawled out of An elevator shaft?	/r/MensRights	09/03/13 04:37 AM
1	I'm 20 and was just diagnosed with a terminal illness. fuck you r/againstmensrights! I cant edit my other reply, but I want to add that I agree about societal problems not being zero sum. My issue is that you are to eager to label something as oppression. Personally, with exclusions for legal inequalities (disparity in custody law and harsher prison sentences), I don't find the term oppression to be relevant to men's rights. I also don't think it is matter of rights, but increasing utility, I.e. reducing problems.	/r/MensRights	03/03/13 04:06 PM
1	I'm 20 and was just diagnosed with a terminal illness. fuck you r/againstmensrights! You had me until,"women just experience worse things then men." You can't seriously mean that when we have 90 percent of work place deaths are men, the majority of homeless are men, the majority of suicides are men, more men are in prison, more men are murdered, more highschool dropouts are men, men account for fewer college degrees, and the majority of our military are men.	/r/MensRights	03/03/13 03:58 PM
5	FYI: r/mensrights is currently being trolled by a user calling himself billbailey and hipsteruser by different accounts. He has attempted to garner sympathy, in order to open up a subreddit created on I think you are confusing schizophrenia with psychopathy. Edit: missing word	/r/MensRights	03/03/13 03:39 PM
1	I'm 20 and was just diagnosed with a terminal illness. fuck you r/againstmensrights! My point is these things aren't oppressive, but I see you would rather be dismissive and flippant than discuss it.	/r/MensRights	03/03/13 02:49 PM
1	I'm 20 and was just diagnosed with a terminal illness. fuck you r/againstmensrights! So why would a system oppress women in regards to money and men when it comes to voting? Is there no room for rational self interest causing these trends? Edit: I also want to point out this: According to an analysis of Census Bureau data released by Reach Advisors in 2008, single childless women between ages 22 and 30 were earning more than their male counterparts in most United States cities, with incomes that were 8% greater than males on average. This shift is driven by the growing ranks of …	/r/MensRights	03/03/13 01:57 PM
0	I'm 20 and was just diagnosed with a terminal illness. fuck you r/againstmensrights! they certainly don't deserve to have less of a say in capitalist society, and THAT my friend, is the source of all these real and imagined "unfair double standards" that everyone is yelling about. So power in our capitalistic and democratic nation can only be measured in dollars earned? I simply don't believe that. Women vote more than men. Even if men are "naturally disposed" to vote less, they certainly don't deserve to have less of a say in our democratic society, and THAT my friend, is the s…	/r/MensRights	03/03/13 01:35 PM
0	I'm 20 and was just diagnosed with a terminal illness. fuck you r/againstmensrights! Your citation for "B" doesn't account for the variation in for the meaning of "full time," overtime, or Women choosing jobs that payless.	/r/MensRights	03/03/13 12:41 PM
2	Male suicide rises in the UK and government and health professionals do nothing Well if governments are not going to respond to this, what can we do? Any ideas?	/r/MensRights	29/01/13 07:05 AM
1	"Academic critics reject the research cited by Men's rights activists"? It mentions suicide under health.	/r/MensRights	17/01/13 04:19 AM
6	Feminists defended women's right to kill men who don't return their affections. Twelve years for a single murder is pretty privileged too. Never said it wasn't. What I will say is that it isn't the first time a government has been duped like this. If that makes you feel indignant, consider Abdelbaset al-Megrahi. He killed 270 people by blowing up a jet. He served only eight and half years before being released for "compassionate reasons." He lived freely for three years.	/r/MensRights	08/01/13 08:03 PM
17	Feminists defended women's right to kill men who don't return their affections. Double murder? She killed one person.	/r/MensRights	08/01/13 07:39 PM
1	[Funny] Women-only hysteria & double standards - from a great Men's Rights Tumblr I'm a supporter of the MRM. So try again.	/r/MensRights	16/11/12 11:59 PM
2	[Funny] Women-only hysteria & double standards - from a great Men's Rights Tumblr I just want to point out two things. One homicidal ideation is very common (50-90% of the population). Two that second quote comes from a discussion about racism and isn't proposed as good thing. Now I have question for you. Why is it that manhood101 is constantly spammed everywhere?	/r/MensRights	16/11/12 09:57 PM
7	A real feminist at work!!!! Have you read any of her books? She is incredibly critical of feminism.	/r/MensRights	27/10/12 10:43 AM
5	A real feminist at work!!!! Yes, she is at least a little crazy. She doesn't even capitalize the first letters in her name - bell hooks.	/r/MensRights	27/10/12 10:42 AM
6	Norah Vincent: writer disguised herself as a man for 18 months to write a book on gender. After the experiment, she was institutionalized for depression, and stated that she never felt so glad for being a woman. [xpost from: todayilearned] humor That is where the radical part comes from.	/r/MensRights	27/10/12 02:54 AM
1	Update in "Man Asks do I know you" case As a small framed woman, a man large man approaching me in a parking garage is very frightening. I honestly would have made a complaint to security too. I'd rather be safe than sorry. Nice. Apparently, being reported to the police for being big and scary isn't an isolated incident. This whole thing makes me sick.	/r/MensRights	27/10/12 02:42 AM
2	Controversial Claim. Still true if you replace "racist" with "misogynist". There is no such thing as "everyone playing by the same rules," and there never will be. Nature and society dictate that not everyone is equal. Our rules and laws should reflect that. Should all students receive the same education? Even if they have learning impairments, learn better under a different style of teaching, or are blind? Should the old be judged the same as the young? Should we as a society not accommodate them when the alternative is a drastic reduction in their quality of life? I …	/r/MensRights	25/10/12 09:45 AM
1	Michelle Obama's Facebook page just put this up. Yes, there are a lot of problems with our justice system, but that doesn't all of a sudden make privatization a good thing for the prison system.	/r/MensRights	24/10/12 03:18 AM
1	Michelle Obama's Facebook page just put this up. I'm sure he would, but the justice system shouldn't be put in such a position. The people who run those private prisons have a very large incentive to increase prison population, and there is a very straight forward way to do that. I don't know why some people obsess over privatizing everything. A business has one motivation. Their motivation is not to provide the best service possible for the lowest price, but instead to make the most money possible.	/r/MensRights	24/10/12 01:20 AM
1	Michelle Obama's Facebook page just put this up. From your link: What about private prison companies lobbying for more prisoners? Johnson said he never had seen anything related to this. I tend to believe Johnson when he makes statements like this. He’s not your typical politician, he's honest and straightforward, and he’s really a businessperson who got into politics to make a difference so he has nothing to gain from lying nor lose from telling the truth. I don't know about lobbying, but here in PA about 1000 Juvenile convicts had their conv…	/r/MensRights	24/10/12 12:10 AM
7	Friend uploaded this to FB - Imagine if 'man' was changed for 'woman' and the uproar there would be. What is this /r/furry?	/r/MensRights	20/10/12 11:34 PM
3	Feminist domestic violence campaigner assaults man at violence against women session You're missing the pattern, though. Taken as an isolated incident, i'd probably go ahead and side with him. However: if you watch any of his other videos, he has a paparazzi feel to him. By that I mean, he's annoying with the camera. Shoves it in people's face. Tries to get them to verify badge numbers, last names with spelling, etc. He's not polite, he doesn't adequate explain what he's trying to accomplish other than stating "I hate a right to film," etc. You are right, I am missing the patter…	/r/MensRights	20/10/12 02:18 AM
4	Feminist domestic violence campaigner assaults man at violence against women session We don't have it on video, but I'd bet you my next paycheck that he was goading her somehow. His videos are not exactly examples of polite courtesies and pleasant conversation. He gets in people's faces, he starts shit and he calls people names, all under the guise of "protecting himself." Even if I accept what you are saying is true, I don't see how being annoying is "abhorrent behavior." Recording someone is simply not abhorrent. The fact that she responds to such an inoffensive annoyance with…	/r/MensRights	19/10/12 11:44 PM
2	Feminist domestic violence campaigner assaults man at violence against women session Abhorrent behavior?	/r/MensRights	19/10/12 10:58 PM
1	Happened just now. I don't even remember ever posting there. If you're this afraid of dissent, you're just insecure in your views. THIS IS/WAS TAUGHT IN PHYSICS DEPARTMENTS. It relates to local violations for local meaning very very very small distances and times. That isn't what I was taught in my physics department. My physics professor explicitly stated that quantum fluctuations do not violate conservation of energy. THIS IS NOT TRUE AT ALL and certainly does not occur over very very very small distances or time. Yes it is, there is more energy on earth each day due to the sun. If make your system as just the earth, the …	/r/MensRights	15/10/12 10:55 PM
1	Happened just now. I don't even remember ever posting there. If you're this afraid of dissent, you're just insecure in your views. After I just wrote a statement that isn't true, what do YOU think I meant when I wrote "amirite guys". Again, what does WOOSH mean to you? Okay, can we just agree that we got off on the wrong foot? First, I took several of the things you said to mean the exact opposite. When you said your statement above (about vacuums), it was without context. I would not expect most people to know that vacuums were not empty, so when you said that I thought you were most people. Second, you never related what …	/r/MensRights	15/10/12 10:29 PM
11	Happened just now. I don't even remember ever posting there. If you're this afraid of dissent, you're just insecure in your views. No one is attacking here. There is a big difference between, irrational beliefs, unsupported beliefs, group think, and religion. Over generalizing or falsely attributing attributes to make a shorter sentence is a piss poor excuse and he should be called out for it. When people equivocate positions, it lets them avoid responsibility for their actions. I can call all sorts of irrational behavior and thinking religion, and then pat myself on the back and say I don't have those problems because I am…	/r/MensRights	15/10/12 10:19 PM
1	Happened just now. I don't even remember ever posting there. If you're this afraid of dissent, you're just insecure in your views. Amiright guys. What does that mean? You ability to form an idea and get it into words is lacking. Still not addressing your unfounded belief that virtual particles create energy.	/r/MensRights	15/10/12 10:12 PM
1	Happened just now. I don't even remember ever posting there. If you're this afraid of dissent, you're just insecure in your views. Which is why you said it was Space is a vacuum. The absence of matter. Matter is energy. There is no matter in a perfect vacuum, in space, so there is no meaningful way to discuss energy of a vacuum. And while we are at it, you also thought virtual particles created energy. That physics degree is really paying off. Even if you didn't mean either of those things, you never learned to properly communicate.	/r/MensRights	15/10/12 10:03 PM
1	Happened just now. I don't even remember ever posting there. If you're this afraid of dissent, you're just insecure in your views. Yes, talk down to me some more, and don't address anything else I said. Lets not forget that you thought the vacuum of space was completely empty.	/r/MensRights	15/10/12 09:43 PM
1	Happened just now. I don't even remember ever posting there. If you're this afraid of dissent, you're just insecure in your views. I said the plural "particles." Yes, you can say the particle has energy, but no energy is created. If one of the virtual particles is sucked into a black hole, the result is that black hole ends up radiating energy and shrinks. I wouldn't know anything about that. I don't even know if it that is possible. Atheism can be defined on paper as X, doesn't mean atheists actually behave like X is true. Ok, so you used the word religion when there are countless other words that better describe the intel…	/r/MensRights	15/10/12 09:34 PM
2	Happened just now. I don't even remember ever posting there. If you're this afraid of dissent, you're just insecure in your views. Biochemist here and i took quantum mechanics. I am talking about quantum fluctuations. That means that conservation of energy can appear to be violated, but only for small times. This allows the creation of particle-antiparticle pairs of virtual particles. The effects of these particles are measurable, for example, in the effective charge of the electron, different from its "naked" charge.	/r/MensRights	15/10/12 09:06 PM
1	Happened just now. I don't even remember ever posting there. If you're this afraid of dissent, you're just insecure in your views. I don't need to look it up. Those particles exist specifically because they don't create energy.	/r/MensRights	15/10/12 08:52 PM
3	Happened just now. I don't even remember ever posting there. If you're this afraid of dissent, you're just insecure in your views. I just don't see what that has to do with atheism. Also, those things are described by science. So what is your point?	/r/MensRights	15/10/12 08:08 PM
5	Happened just now. I don't even remember ever posting there. If you're this afraid of dissent, you're just insecure in your views. One, there is no such thing as a perfect vacuum, and, two, what the hell are you talking about.	/r/MensRights	15/10/12 07:57 PM
13	Happened just now. I don't even remember ever posting there. If you're this afraid of dissent, you're just insecure in your views. Atheists as humans are not immune from having thoughts, behaviors, tactics, normally associated with the religious. That is the important part, but by saying "religion" you make it sound as if people who are not a member do not do that.	/r/MensRights	15/10/12 07:55 PM
-2	Happened just now. I don't even remember ever posting there. If you're this afraid of dissent, you're just insecure in your views. It's because atheism plus at its heart is no better than any religion -- it is religion. Yeah, I am gonna have to disagree with you on that. Religions have dogmas. To call yourself an atheist implies one thing: no belief in a god or gods. The same can be said of theism: it only implies the belief in a god or gods. Both are descriptors of single stance and are not religions. There can be dogmas held by atheists, but they rarely have anything to do with a no god or lack of belief in god position. …	/r/MensRights	15/10/12 07:45 PM
1	Women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of domestic violence cases. This is just one study, so yes, it can be disputed. That said, I don't see anything worth disputing.	/r/MensRights	09/10/12 12:09 AM
1	32 Year Old Mom Sentenced To Jail For Incest With Her Teen Son Except for the jaundice.	/r/MensRights	24/09/12 01:03 PM
4	Have you ever had a girlfriend? Miranda	/r/MensRights	10/09/12 05:26 AM
2	"If men are the only group one can joke about exterminating, ... perhaps it means that antimale bigotry, especially among the narrow elite, has reached potentially dangerous levels." James Taranto The comedy community doesn't pick and choose what jokes are appropriate or not. The New York Times does, or at least it appears to as I have rarely seen joke OP-eds. If they are picking and choosing, shouldn't you be telling them to tolerate all jokes and not us?	/r/MensRights	28/08/12 04:36 PM
1	Men, Who Needs Them? - NYTimes.com I used to really like Dr. Myers. Has he too been bitten by the stupid recently? Edit: Yeah the stupid got him.	/r/MensRights	28/08/12 06:18 AM
5	ACTIVISM OPPORTUNITY: Tell Mr. Hampikian and Boise State's Biology Department how you feel about one of their faculty dismissing the value of men. Indeed, especially after the OP asks everyone to be polite.	/r/MensRights	26/08/12 08:07 PM
2	ACTIVISM OPPORTUNITY: Tell Mr. Hampikian and Boise State's Biology Department how you feel about one of their faculty dismissing the value of men. I sent him an email last night asking him if he would be interested in answering some questions. I don't expect to get a response until Monday as many professors don't read their email during the weekend. I think it should be noted that he works as the director of the Idaho Innocence Project and was involved in freeing men who were falsely convicted of rape. Please don't turn this into a one issue bitch fest.	/r/MensRights	26/08/12 08:06 PM
4	X-post from /r/offbeat, didn't find it posted here and thought it needed to be noticed. "Stunning" Angelina Jolie lookalike held a man at knifepoint and "forced him to have sex" according to police. She doesn't look like jolie.... This is a disturbing waiting cover a rape.. 'Tatum channing look a like holds girl at knife point ams rapes her... S' I'm not quite sure what you said, but I think I agree with it.	/r/MensRights	26/08/12 07:50 PM
1	Men, Who Needs Them? - NYTimes.com I'm referring to the expansion of the universe. It is expanding and it is accelerating. I think you misread my post; i.e. I said it wasn't static, but Einstein said it was.	/r/MensRights	26/08/12 05:30 PM
3	Men, Who Needs Them? - NYTimes.com if you had need of the innocent project's help, would you think that they'd take your case M)ore or L)ess seriously, knowing that the director wrote that piece and was proud of it. Less. Well for what it is worth, I am going to email him and see if he has a thick enough skin to comment here on the negative response.	/r/MensRights	26/08/12 02:30 AM
1	Men, Who Needs Them? - NYTimes.com From what I wrote above Oddly enough, he co-wrote Exit to Freedom a book about "The true story of a man who served 16 years in Georgia prisons for a rape he did not commit until DNA evidence freed him," and works for the Idaho Justice Project. He is probably responsible for freeing many men who were convicted for rape that they didn't commit, which should make him well liked by this subreddit. Do you still think he should resign?	/r/MensRights	26/08/12 01:58 AM
1	Men, Who Needs Them? - NYTimes.com it's just another corrupt, ideologically-driven racket. It's a money racket, but that is another thing entirely. The reality is that having education is not a litmus test for not being an imbecile. This is especially true for holding ideas and beliefs that are outside of your field. Scratch that. Take Einstein for instance. Brilliant man, but he could never except that universe was anything but static. He was wrong and it was known that he was wrong for many years before his death. Being educate…	/r/MensRights	26/08/12 01:55 AM
19	Men, Who Needs Them? - NYTimes.com The fact he's a professor of biology I almost find offensive. I thought the article was funny until I saw that.	/r/MensRights	26/08/12 01:22 AM
1	Friendly Reminder: Social issues affect MEN too. That doesn't say anything about rights. Interestingly your last two comments contradict each other. their creator with certain inalienable Rights Inalienable not transferable to another or capable of being repudiated You say that a right can be repudiated by law: if there is no legal standing to deprive someone of their life, then that right cannot be infringed upon. This suggests that they aren't rights or that you need to take a look at what you mean by rights.	/r/MensRights	25/08/12 06:36 PM
2	Friendly Reminder: Social issues affect MEN too. The Declaration of Independence is NOT US LAW.	/r/MensRights	25/08/12 06:13 PM
2	Friendly Reminder: Social issues affect MEN too. we don't have laws against murder because it's immoral, we have them because it denies someone their rights. Terms like "rights" are a way of framing a moral stance. Troll. Showing you clearly have no idea of the laws that govern the United States. Can you clarify that statement, but with less angst? If people have a right to life, why is there no universal healthcare and why is the death penalty accepted in most states? Can you point to a law that says we have a right to life? Does a new butter…	/r/MensRights	25/08/12 05:46 PM
3	I prefer Creame and Sugar. Have you ever smelled coffee before? Those are aromatic compounds evaporating or sublimating. When you reduce the temperature, you reduce the rate of evaporation. Also, the lipids in coffee can oxidize and become rancid. For every 10 degrees C you reduce the environment that a chemical reaction is occuring at, the rate of reaction reduces by 2 or 3 times (this is a generalization). However, putting your coffee in the freezer can subject it to "freezer smells."	/r/MensRights	20/08/12 12:49 AM