TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

notsoinsaneguy Archive

View 0 posts and 47 comments by notsoinsaneguy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

That story might work on yourself, but I've been on the internet long enough to know that internet fights don't have winners - only losers. There's never a good reason to pick internet fights. Internet arguments never convince anyone of anything, and all you'll accomplish is making both yourself, your cause, and whoever interacts with you look stupid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/21 05:22 AM
0

Honestly, based on the comments I've seen here, many of the people who are in favour of this "movement" or whatever you want to call it are not operating in good faith - a big part of why I don't see this succeeding. While I'm sure to some people this is about uplifting men, you can't deny that there are a lot of people in here for whom it is more about tearing down feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/21 06:09 PM
-1

I'm sorry, all of this reads to me exactly like someone trying to radicalize people towards the alt right in exactly the same way 4channers did with their "it's okay to be white" messaging. It sounds like the same "identity politics have gone too far" stuff that has been pushing people towards Trump for the past 4 years. Can you clarify how you plan to distinguish yourself from alt-righters who use nearly identical tactics to attack pretty much identical targets? I know that your intentions are …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/21 03:28 AM
-2

Okay, but you know that this is going to cause like a ton of internet arguments for everyone who gets involved in it? Intentions are really hard to read over the internet, and this movement you've created is honestly somewhat hard to differentiate from a 4chan troll (like the whole "It's okay to be white" thing). I don't doubt that many men, along with people who like men, are going to assume that this movement is supposed to be some kind of attack on feminism, or a means to shift focus away fro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/21 12:27 AM
0

Okay, well, I see this going terribly for everyone. I hope I'm wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/21 11:42 PM
-2

So you're clearly just looking for an internet fight, right? You have a solid us vs them mentality, and all it this is going to do is entrench people further into whatever camp they were already in. If you want to actually do anything to benefit men, you have to come at it from the lens of "hey, I understand and see your pain, but when you show it this way it's hurting people that you probably didn't intend to hurt. Let's try to cooperate to find solutions that benefit everyone!". Instead it rea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/21 11:30 PM
0

Sorry, but I believe you are talking out of your ass. Do you have any evidence whatsoever that there has been even a single case where both parties were drunk (IE: neither had control over their actions, or both had difficulty recalling the event) and the man was convicted of a crime, let alone enough cases to justify such a generalization? It's one thing to be mad at injustices, it's another to invent injustices to be mad about.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:39 PM
1

I can't find any figures for how many rapes occur in Montreal. If someone somewhere, knows, they certainly haven't made the figures available. On the other hand, we know that exactly 28 people have been murdered, with 9 people who have gone missing who may have also been murdered. I can't give you numbers that nobody has bothered to actually count, and it's obviously not within my abilities to figure out how many rapes have occurred in Montreal this year. You're asking some pretty unreasonable s…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 02:35 AM
1

I mean, this comparison kinda doesn't work because murder isn't really as prevalent in our society as rape is. Nobody actually slaughters prisoners IRL. Brutal slaughters aren't commonplace is most first world areas, at least not up here in Canada. I know in Montreal we typically get only like 30 or so murders a year. All those cases are tragic, but considering it's a city of 1.6 million people, it's far from commonplace, at least compared to rape.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 03:02 AM
1

It's basically the same thing as when math programs invite women and black people to apply. It comes off as being mildly sexist, but the intention of demonstrating that men who care for their families won't be judged negatively for it is right.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:38 AM
1

As someone who has been to a few conventions with female friends, I have to say that despite the regulations that exist for dealing with stalkers and harassment, it's nearly impossible to get anyone to do anything about it. It's not about people looking, obviously if you're wearing a costume it's assumed that people will look at you. However, it seems people don't understand that it's not okay to stalk or harass people just because they're wearing a costume. If all you're doing is looking at peo…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 11:34 PM
-1

The problem is that a lot of people aren't aware of what rape is. By saying don't rape, you're asking people to consider whether or not their actions can be construed as rape. There was a good article regarding a teacher telling her class about the Steubenville incident, and a large number of the students in her class not understanding why it was rape essentially because they had never been taught. Saying "don't rape" isn't about getting suspicious evil people to stop being evil, it's about gett…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 11:23 PM
0

Before I begin, saying that someone is "simply" wrong, without even attempting to refute what they've said is an easy way to demonstrate you have no ground to argue on. Ignoring that however, let's talk about this video. It seems this woman says essentially a lot of what you said, and I still disagree. She raises a point early about abandoning children, and claims it is the woman abandoning the child and she is granted the choice when this is clearly not the case. The woman AS well as the man BO…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 09:47 PM
-2

I'm not on a high horse, and logic is on my side: As a society, we generally don't think an embryo is a child. We are concerned about the child once it begins to exist, not when it is a small group of cells. Why can the man abandon the child to a heated box for the State to take care of? Surely having a father is in the best interest of the child? (When people give up a child, it's not just the women who doesn't want it, it's both partners.) The reason we allow for this is because forcing someon…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:43 PM
-2

I don't think we're instituting slavery in any conceivable way? Could you clarify? Regarding Dave Foley, I'm not sure what it is exactly that troubles you about it. It seems like he was fully capable of paying child support but chose not to. Later, when he found himself making far less money, a judge told him that he still owed the money he was supposed to have given (back when he was able to pay it). That sounds like a pretty fair judgement to me, but either way this is not an average case. Als…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:39 PM
-2

Okay, to start with, I'm not arguing that men should have to pay child support if they are just some random bloke who is not the children's father, nor am I arguing that they should be forced to pay child support in the event that some crazy person somehow got ahold of their sperm and impregnated themselves. I think we can agree that these cases are probably not the majority of cases though. Yeah, it's an issue if that's how these cases are treated, (these fringe cases are the reason I believe t…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:27 PM
-2

So now we're saying it's the woman's fault if she gets pregnant? Also, as a Canadian, I was not aware of how poorly child support is handled in the states. Perhaps the first thing to do would be to re-implement it in a meaningful way that doesn't end up putting people in jail needlessly?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:12 PM
-1

Well, I live in Canada where child support is simply money that is granted to the primary caretaker of a child to be spent on ensuring the child's needs are met. I wasn't aware that it was complete nonsense in the States, and if it is as you describe it to be, then you should probably worry about overhauling that system much more than you should worry about who has to pay into it.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:02 PM
-1

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what exactly a financial abortion is. Could you clarify?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:57 PM
-3

"Clearly". This comment if fucking ridiculous. I know I'm in /r/mensrights and so I guess I should expect that people think society is somehow always pro-woman and anti-man, but what? Really? Society doesn't give a fuck about the child? What society have you been living in that doesn't give a fuck about children?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:51 PM
-4

Aborting a child is not a fucking trivial thing. Being pro-choice doesn't mean thinking that abortions are things to be given out like candy. It's easy as hell for a man to say they think a woman should get an abortion, but he has no right to tell her she must. The man doesn't have rights in this situation, there is a child inside a woman and fucking with her insides is trivially wrong. The woman has the right to get or not get an abortion, but a man has no fucking right to tell her what to do. …
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:40 PM
-4

The reason that single fathers don't have the income issues is because the only single men who want to be fathers are the ones who have enough income to support kids in the first place. Women choose not to get abortions for several reasons, not simply because they want to have kids. That's the thing about pro-choice, it's about not forcing a belief system of a large population. The point still stands that a lot of people are very anti-abortion in the states, and those who believe life begins at …
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:21 PM
-1

Men are underrepresented in teaching because society tells men that being nurturing and caring are neither manly nor valuable traits. Also, you make a good point about the position being in demand, however, where I live (in Quebec), we have consistently had a shortage of teachers in the past several years, resulting in hiring of people who are not qualified for the position. This has not helped close the wage gap between the two positions at all, despite this indication that it ought to be more …
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:16 PM
-5

That is very clearly not in the best interests of the child though...
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:10 PM
-2

This is nothing to be proud of. Jobs that men generally prefer still pay better than jobs that women generally prefer. There's nothing inherently more valuable about software engineering than there is about teaching elementary school. Both are important jobs that will help progress society, and both can be learned in 4 years at university. They're both very rewarding jobs, and both have their share of difficulties. It's hard to make many comparisons between the two in terms of contribution to so…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:52 PM
-11

Do people not understand what child support is for? The point is to support the child. Raising a kid as a single mother is not an easy thing to do. Given that many single mothers are below the poverty line, I personally would rather have the biological father pay than have the state pay for it. Women have the shitty card when both parties agree and when both parties disagree. Being the one who has to carry a baby around inside yourself sucks, as is being the one who has to actually get an aborti…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 02:42 PM
2

Women currently make up 14% of the military. Women who are currently in the military are not homeless veterans, they're still in the military. Numbers or women in the military historically have been lower than 10%, less than 2% in the 1960's and 1970's and 9% in the 1980's from what I can tell (http://iwl.rutgers.edu/documents/njwomencount/Women%20in%20Military%202009%20Final.pdf) . So based on these numbers, yeah, it actually does seem like they have it worse, albeit perhaps only slightly. Eith…
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:40 PM
1

In attempting to defy the definition that most people in real life understand, you've listed a bunch of internet personalities. I can assure you, most college students have not heard of "Girlwriteswhat", "typhonblue", or "onereiossiossgrip". The definition of feminism that nearly everyone knows is that of "women deserve equal rights". Any other definition of feminism will not be recognized by the average person. If you want to argue with feminist groups, you need to do precisely that. Argue with…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:47 PM
2

Sure, they're opposing joint custody, but nowhere do they state that mothers should be granted preference for custody. They are careful not to identify genders, because it's not a gender issue. By claiming that they're taking an anti-men stance you're putting words in the mouth of this feminist group. Nobody would argue that a man who is the primary caregiver of a child should lose custody of the child after divorce.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:25 PM
3

I can't seem to find a source for your first thing...nowhere can I find any feminist group making claims they intend to push for mother preference for custody. The only places I can find that claim that feminists push for mother preference for custody are unsourced men's rights activist blogs. An no, not necessarily in the west, but worldwide definitely. In the west, yeah women and men are close to being equal in most regards, a lot of the important work has been done. However nearly everywhere …
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:56 PM
1

Please show me these feminist organizations that have millions and millions in funding pushing anti-men agendas? It's worth noting as well that the feminist movement is bigger, and reasonably so because while Men's Rights does have a few issues to tackle, women's rights has quite a lot more. So there are a lot more "worst" to choose from, making it a pretty easy job. However, on a daily basis you can still see hate-filled protest of feminism by simply looking at the spam that goes on in /r/femin…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:48 PM
1

What makes you think this to be true?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:58 AM
-7

They're underrepresented only in arts fields though. We do not need more artists.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:39 AM
4

They're 60% of college students, but have you ever seen a math, physics, computer science or engineering class? The ratio is typically 30 men to 1 woman. So to answer your question, they are underrepresented on earth.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:38 AM
9

The reason they want underrepresented groups to apply is because they're underrepresented. White males will still be the majority of people accepted, you have nothing to worry about.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:36 AM
4

Dude, this post is pushing the frontiers of activism. With nearly 1000 upvotes, it will almost certainly change the world!
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:25 AM
6

But being a man is harrrrddd!
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:23 AM
32

Have you actually met anyone who said this? It's easy to pick the weakest of a group and criticize the whole group for their existence. The same can definitely done to the Men's Rights movement. Stupid people are prevalent on the internet, and they prescribe to all sorts of philosophies. Assuming they are an accurate representation the philosophies is foolhardy.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:21 AM
-1

I'm pretty fucking glad that I don't have to deal with a landlord trying to peep at me, and while I'm certainly smart enough to avoid it anyways, it's still nice to know it will never be an issue. Also, on top of this, legislature already exists nearly everywhere preventing gender discrimination on leases, so men's rights are actually not needed, what's needed is to simply bring the people posting these ads to court. If the guy who posted that picture actually gave a shit, this would not have be…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:19 AM
-14

Also: I need the mens rights movement because when I was looking for a place to rent, over half the posted ads clearly stated “seeking female tenants only” I'm sorry, but I think this is quite clearly a case where men have an advantage, not a disadvantage. The reason you don't see "seeking male tenants only" is because no creepy landlord is going to try to set up cameras to check you out in the shower. No female who has half a brain would ever respond to an ad seeking female tenants only.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 09:18 PM
3

I agree that individual differences are important and should be focused on. I don't believe that acknowledging trends in general is useful, because it likely hurt the individuals that will run contrary to the trend. On top of that, I'm sure that most of these expectations end up being self-fulfilling. If we continue to think of males as the way we have traditionally, I imagine it will never come to pass that we'll see an equal number of fathers as the primary caretaker of children as women. As l…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 06:06 PM
3

I feel like 80% of this subreddit only comes here to read post titles and get outraged without actually reading the articles themselves...
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:06 AM
5

It's sad that this sensationalist post got all the upvotes it did. The reasoning should be pretty obvious even without having to read the article. Raising pitchforks over nothing does nobody any good.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:04 AM
21

I believe what you have discovered for yourself is that Misogyny and Misandry are two sides of the same coin. You cannot have one without the other, anywhere you find Misogyny, you will find some form of Misandry. If you view women as caretakers and men as earners, then women who want to be earners and men who want to be caretakers will have issues. The only way to resolve the issue is to resolve both at once, not through legislature, but simply by removing the idea of gender roles from society …
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:01 AM
2

I'd agree in almost all cases, but men get raped by other men more than they get raped by women. "Teaching men not to rape" would, if done effectively, significantly reduce rapes of both males and females. Though that does include prison inmates, so perhaps we'd need to put these posters up in prisons as well.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:33 AM
1

I think the point is that a drunk person is more likely to get into a sexual situation than a student loan promissory note situation. If such situations were more likely, perhaps your posters would be needed.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:31 AM
2

The thing is that people telling you not to have been walking in a shitty part of town are dicks. You just got mugged, you don't need to be berated for this shitty thing that happened to you. People aren't stupid, they know that by taking some actions certain consequences can be rendered less likely. Saying to someone that they shouldn't have been in such and such neighborhood after dark doesn't help anyone, and only serves to make the victim feel worse than they already do. Also, it's worth not…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter