TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

notunhinged Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by notunhinged on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

I haven't studied the history of feminism enough to know either way but I do know the Suffragettes took part in the 'White Feather' movement to shame and victimise men who refused to join up during WWI.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 02:57 PM
1

'Relationship', 'affair'...
/r/MensRights24/09/18 12:02 PM
64

This wasn't even heat of the moment murder, it was premeditated and very calculating and callous. She is a truly dangerous person.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 07:19 AM
2

The burden of proof for investigating supposed sexual assaults is very low. If a woman accuses a man of rape unless he can prove his innocence he will be processed and have his DNA taken. This guy was named and shamed, lost his job, his friends and kept waiting over a year for a trial based on nothing more than a crazy accusation http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/man-falsely-accused-of-sexually-assault-on-actress-wants-apology-from-cps-over-bemusing-case-a6877036.html Feminists say …
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:19 AM
18

Who is the woman next to him? It is pretty odd how she completely ignores him.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 05:03 PM
47

Big names like Paltrow or Jolie were already multi-millionaires with well established careers behind them, they could have trashed Weinstein any time. now they are all trying to get in on the 'victim' action when really they were part of the conspiracy of silence.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 05:27 AM
1

Well it is a big world so there is likely a lot of variation amongst departments and individuals. The same social worker defended allowing a guy to continue working with vulnerable children even though he bit his son, because 'it is very common'. I am sure it is very common if parents are allowed to harm their sons without repercussions.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 09:13 AM
15

A social worker once told me about a dysfunctional family they had under observation where the boys were 'basically fucking each other' and they did nothing until the family had a daughter whereupon they performed an intervention. It was the clearest official admission I have ever heard that abuse of males is an irrelevance. I wouldn't be surprised if all the boys were then automatically placed on a watchlist. I don't think it is an absurd leap to suggest that by not protecting boys they know th…
/r/MensRights24/10/17 08:27 AM
2

Falsely accused men end up on a register exposed to the 'barbarity of the world', what's the difference? The only difference I can think of is that a prosecution of a false accuser is always based upon evidence, but rape convictions can be based upon nothing more than testimony. Men are in a very vulnerable position.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 09:11 AM
2

It is a weird site, full of references to how male circumcision makes women suffer.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:20 PM
9

Same reason that if you type 'women' in to google it prompts 'women empowerment' and 'women quotes' and if you type in 'men' it suggests 'meningitis' and 'menopause'.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:19 PM
263

I think the clinic were negligent, for something so important as releasing embryos it should be a witnessed signature. I can't really think of another instance where verifying an identity is so important, because unlike nearly every other form of fraud this situation cannot be undone.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 02:11 PM
5

She can just stay at home and look after the children.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 09:15 PM
161

Men are 93% of all homicide victims in Honduras.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 02:34 PM
8

Those links discuss the fact that men receive longer sentences than women, which is an established fact. I need a link to the specific point in question.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 07:52 AM
2

They would literally say that this is discrimination against women because the judge is being patronising.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 07:37 AM
7

Do you have a link for the increased sentencing for men if they have children? Sounds incredible, but nothing would now surprise me.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 07:34 AM
1

Sure, a lot of children do remain semi-dependant on their parents until their twenties.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 08:10 AM
3

Yeah I know you do, but you haven't given any more justification why. We don't allow children to choose to do any other life changing things at 13, like get tattoos, drive, drink, have sex etc so why allow irreversible genital mutilation? It isn't difficult to imagine where a boy gets told that if they don't 'choose' genital mutilation then they won't be getting college funding from their parents. I don't even like the term 'circumcision'. The process is not simply 'cutting around'.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 07:56 AM
7

It should be 18 at least, children are open to all sorts of parental pressure and coercion. *I actually think that non-medical genital mutilation should be completely outlawed. Medical ethics should already prevent doctors from carrying out the procedure, it is outrageous that the medical profession allows it, it is totally in contravention of the Hippocratic Oath.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:15 AM
1

Really? Fuck that.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:21 PM
13

'Faces up to' two years. In other words, probably will receive a non-custodial sentence.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter