TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

noturtles Archive

View 3 posts and 47 comments by noturtles on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-24

Do you actually have any idea how transgenderism works? I mean, being against is one thing, but claiming that "no one will switch to the male gender"? It's actually pretty common- I personally know two people that have transitioned towards the masculine side. I don't know what else to tell you other than yes that does actually happen.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 06:05 PM
1

There's quite a bit of reasoning behind what I'm saying, if you'd be willing to hear it out. I'm getting the sense that you wouldn't be willing to do that. And talk about making assumptions- I never said a word defending the stoning of women in the middle East. Nor have I spoken to anyone, including philosophers that lie at the heart of feminist thought, that would be anything but against that. You're putting everyone that you disagree with into one category. You're connecting dots that shouldn'…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 05:00 PM
3

Or, you know. Actually make a playlist and share it here and suggest it to Spotify. I mean, honestly I'm trying to think of what that playlist would even be.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:59 PM
1

How can I be hiding behind something if the entire point of my last comment was to try and convince you to actually engage in some form of meaningful discourse? If anything, you're hiding behind claiming ridiculousness. Without even giving a reason why, just kind of saying it as if it's self-evident. So yeah, you left out some details, but you basically described my thought process. Now, like I said, would it kill you to try and figure out why I think that?
/r/MensRights16/02/18 10:26 PM
1

Soo.... Slang is out. Dialects can't be a thing. It was dumb for us to allow new languages to evolve from old ones. I mean by that logic it's dumb that the word "earth" describes our planet. Why don't people just understand that it originally pretty much just meant dirt?
/r/MensRights13/02/18 11:32 PM
0

Backwards thinking is relative. From my point of view, the majority of the content on this sub is backwards thinking, to the exact same degree that you just said. I don't even know how to respond to it because it's just so wrong to me. But I still subscribe and I still read the articles and the comments because I want to know how the subscribers here think. And I've been subbed here for like 5 years. Honestly, my opinions are much more rounded because of that. I don't really feel bad that you're…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 11:23 PM
-8

How is it not? Being the norm is cultural dominance. If I'm not mistaken, are you trying to make the point that it is not a privilege to be considered the "default" of being a person? Why on earth would you think it isn't? Again, if I'm misinterpreting your question, then I apologise, but as I've pointed out in another reply, it's a privilege to identify with the norm because this thinking permeates so many important aspects of our culture and the way we think. So my question to you is why you t…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 06:57 AM
-28

Yeah and "Uranus" has nothing to do with an anus, but let's be real here. The way that language sounds affects the way that we think about things, regardless of the actual linguistic roots. I disagree-I think it is reflective of a sexist society. It's undeniable that men, in general, are physically stronger than women. But that's a huge generalization, and the nuanced reality is evidenced by the fact that there are actually police that are women that are perfectly capable of doing their job (and…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 06:27 AM
-51

That's precisely the problem. The language implies that it's the norm to be a man. And it implies that to be a woman is a deviation from that norm. Don't believe me? Imagine a world where the definition of man and woman are flipped. So now every time someone says "Policeman" or "the dawn of man" the first image that pops in your head is what we would right now call a woman. I don't know about you, but it's really hard to imagine. Yet I use a language where the first thing that pops in my head wh…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 05:17 AM
-7

Fuck Milo.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 06:02 PM
1

As someone who has taken take-home exams, the ones that I took were definitely not the cakewalk that everyone here seems to be assuming.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 03:06 AM
1

I can see that, but why do you think that is?
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:01 PM
-2

I think you're generalizing a bit much
/r/MensRights05/04/17 07:36 PM
1

male centric hobby What the fuck is that even supposed to mean? I certainly don't give a shit who else likes the same things I like, all I care about is that I like those things. I really don't see the point in trying to gatekeep something like this. Look, all I'm saying is that lately MRAs have been just as caught up in this type of shit that doesn't really matter as the tumblrinas. I literally don't care if there are good or bad attempts to make strong female leads.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:09 PM
-2

I don't see what this has to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 02:58 PM
4

I'm sorry, did you read any of it? I mean, I realize Wikipedia is written by "anyone," but it's all sourced and most of the site has been heavily reviewed by others. He has been caught on tape multiple times either admitting to habitually engaging in what can at the very least be described asperverted activities like using his position to "inspect" beauty pageant dressing rooms, or just generally objectifying women. There is currently no hard evidence that he has raped, but there are things to b…
/r/MensRights01/04/17 04:34 PM
-2

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations?wprov=sfla1 Edit: apparently some people are not actually as big of a fan of facts as they think they are.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:01 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations?wprov=sfla1
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:01 PM
-2

This needs to be higher up. Meninism is becoming less and less about Men's rights and more and more about exposing certain feminists. I mean, both movements should be working towards having equal treatment of men and women. I really don't see the point in trying to paint feminists as the enemy.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 10:18 PM
1

I think that putting emphasis on the use of either word oversimplifies the matter. Men typically have more money. Sometimes it's for one reason, sometimes for another.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 09:14 PM
1

Yeah, I'm not getting that.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:49 PM
-1

Because meninists are trying to take down political correctness and people getting offended at every little joke. /s I've been here for years. This sub has changed.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:47 PM
0

I usually don't get into it with being a grammar nazi, but since you asked for it, you've actually made several mistakes. Yep the ironing is delicious There should be a comma after "Yep" because it is an interjection. Sadly you won't be able to attack me... There should be a comma after "Sadly". ...because believe it or not I'm a Liberal.... There should be a comma after "...not". Man, you're not good with these commas... If you try and misrepresent what I say as homophobia then I'll just go ahe…
/r/MensRights10/12/16 08:17 PM
1

Seriously, it's like people don't even know what this sub is for anymore
/r/MensRights26/07/16 04:22 AM
3

Even still, though.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 12:05 PM
8

Im about as upset at how bad of a design that is. It can only be appropriately worn one day of the year. Some guys may not care, but I just can't see myself wearing that shirt in public any day other than father's day without feeling silly, even if it weren't for the poor attempt at feminism.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 03:36 AM
1

Well in that case it wouldn't be very good satire because that's not grounded in reality. The people that feel that way about men are actually a very small minority. To say that "men are no longer valued in society unless______" even though the overwhelming majority of men respected and valued by society serve as counterexamples to that claim, only shows how removed from reality son MRA's can be. And don't get me wrong, I'm an MRA myself. But i don't think that that's what the article is satiriz…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 06:45 AM
3

I think you're getting the message of this sub confused with that of r/tumblrinaction or something of the sort. While I think the article is funny, it deals more with trans issues than with men's rights.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 05:53 PM
23

That's great! One of them could replace my psychology teacher. I hate her.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 01:27 PM
1

Well that's an oversimplification.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 05:17 PM
8

Well, ideally it should be equally bad.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 02:01 PM
1

/r/ShitRedditSays
/r/MensRights01/12/14 05:41 PM
2

Well, the people on this sub tend to think feminism only means one thing. Historically, there have been many unique waves and movements under the name of feminism. Just because she doesn't spew bullshit doesn't mean she isn't a feminist. I would argue that she is a very strong one.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:26 AM
1

well just because TED has one talk that you disagree with doesn't mean that you should dislike the whole organization.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 09:24 PM
1

as a 17 year-old dating a 15 year old, this is one of the reasons for which we've agreed to not have sex. it's not even her- her parents are psycho. they'll probably try to get me for it anyway.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 03:15 PM
2

oh, haha i totally didn't notice that. well, the 'r' is next to the 't.'
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:38 AM
1

well so far in my findings the most confirmed percentage is 3% false accusations. the number that gets tossed around here is about 40%, but from what i gather this is incorrect. 3% is still way too much, though.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:42 PM
2

i was a bit confused by it too, but the paper is supposed to be about a social issue in america, and for the most part such issues are reflected in literature. much of the class is spent trying to find such reflections (we just read "the crucible" which reflects paranoia over communists in america). for example if a student were to write about racism, they could use "The Help" by Kathryn Strockett as a source because it provides pathos to the subject and gives the issue a more realistic feel to …
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:44 PM
1

do you mean "mrs. doubtfire" with robin williams? or the book that i now find that it's based off of. if so, its worth looking into. thank you very much, this may do the trick.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:27 PM
1

no, i doubt that that exists. it only needs to support part of the thesis statement. so like a short story about a man losing his kids due to divorce, or one about a man getting falsely accused of rape.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:23 PM
1

correction-i wont try to.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 08:46 PM
1

numbers are cool too.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:51 AM
1

haha i cant stop you or blame you. seems to be a preferable path nowadays.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 01:10 AM
1

right-on. if we are to respond to things, it is best to do so with logic and peace. but don't say anything in return that is just as radical. this ties into #4 about being self critical. (side note, it also has to do with career choice. many women choose to have jobs such as teaching or nursing that do not usually have a high income. i think it ties back to pre-feminism. ever since a freakin long time ago, women were the chosen gender to be concerned with taking care of others while men were con…
/r/MensRights29/12/12 01:07 AM
1

ah yes, i probably should have been more clear about that. of course true gender equality is impossible without there literally being only one gender. we should definitely aim to balance the scale, though, instead of just trying to tip it back to our side. but i'll just ramble for a while about stuff. what i mean is that although our movement is concerned with fighting for the rights of men (hence the name), we need to keep in mind that women are still being oppressed in other ways. i theorize t…
/r/MensRights29/12/12 12:57 AM
1

i'm not sure if you understand. I'm not saying we shouldn't act upon these things, and i'm not saying that we should just stand here and take it. I'm saying that if we really plan on achieving true equality between the sexes, it would be best to do so peacefully. Acting the way you describe will only make us look bad. It's exactly what a lot of feminists do wrong, and we all know how stupid they look when they do this. We would look similarly bad. In all honesty, we have the right to be angry. s…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 07:28 AM
0

downvote all you want, but she does make a good point in saying that we are very rage-filled. i don't like that about us and it should be improved.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter