TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nuala-lala Archive

View 0 posts and 76 comments by nuala-lala on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Too bad it's THIS doctor. The cause is discredited by his voice.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 06:57 AM
4

Is anyone surprised that a feminist would target a male child with her affection? Feminists hate grown, adult men who can actually resist their bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:26 PM
0

Because they're dead? /s
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:42 PM
7

Agreed. If you don't feel sufficiently aggrieved to warrant a report to the police, your other remedy is a civil trial, which you will not pay for if your case is robust. If you don't feel sufficiently aggrieved to make a report to police or that your case is sufficiently robust to risk a civil trial, what do you have really? (Answer: nothing but yourself to blame for your bad choices surrounding your sexuality and well-being)
/r/MensRights20/01/19 11:19 AM
1

I will never buy another P & G product again.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 05:18 AM
9

When did you stop beating your wife?
/r/MensRights16/01/19 05:16 AM
5

Already did my part.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:38 AM
1

Lift off and nuke the site from orbit: I'm out.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 02:06 PM
4

I know when I call for police help, I want my rescuer to be someone who has failed the fitness tests. I'm converting to Islam. At least then I'll have a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 12:32 PM
1

That goes both ways. Exactly, and the only way to do that is to tell the full story.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 05:19 PM
1

Your assumptions about the nature of what he did are EXACTLY the reason all doubt should be eliminated. Nothing warrants a death sentence.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 04:28 PM
1

Why TF won't they tell us what the content of these complaints were? Could it be that it would make the eomen look like heartless harpy POSs?
/r/MensRights27/12/18 02:15 PM
1

Medicine isn't mediated by open-mindedness, fascist, but by empirically observable fact.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 01:09 PM
1

Except they don't: you're not allowed to discriminate on the basis of sex, which this bitch is.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 12:02 PM
1

A doctor shouldn't be delaying anyone's puberty ever. Only a mentally-ill ideologue would argue otherwise.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 11:05 AM
1

Then file a fucking C-16 complaint against that rank, sexist bitch.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 04:14 AM
1

I don't need to Google. Couch was the modern origin of the affluenza defence. I know you think that because Turner was rich, that makes class the big theme in that case, but it wasn't. It is only because he was male that rape was even raised as a possible charge: they were both drunk, interacted consensually, and she became unconscious at some point. The judge treating him better than he might if Turner had been poor is kinda irrelevant: that ALWAYS operates, an is unremarkable as such in this c…
/r/MensRights11/12/18 08:42 PM
1

You're thinking of Ethan Couch, the super rich drunk driver who killed four.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 10:26 AM
1

In other news, water is wet. “The ‘gender wage gap’ is as real as unicorns and has been killed more times than Michael Myers,” writes Phelan. “Yet politicians feel the need to genuflect before this phantom figure.” This guy! I like this guy.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 09:42 AM
1

I'm going to go one step further, (farther?), and say that it's okay even if the market isn't interested in seeing women do what she wants to do. The market doesn't exist to cater to her; it's precisely the opposite, with her, (as someone who wants to harness the market for profit), in the position of finding out what the market wants. Either she has it for sale or she doesn't. End of story. SJWs want to try to artificially force the market to want things it doesn't want. Get woke, go broke is t…
/r/MensRights10/12/18 05:24 PM
1

Shocker.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:57 AM
3

This is actually part and parcel of the communist manifesto whole: their goal is destabilization and destruction of society for the purpose of destroying capitalism. They pursue this goal by attacking the family, (pitting men against women and children against parents), setting races against each other, etc. At this point I'm checking out, going somewhere off the beaten path, and waiting for this to either burn out and die, or succeed, and for capitalism to rise, (as it ALWAYS does), from the as…
/r/MensRights05/12/18 10:05 AM
5

There is an anti-male narrative that must be countered, and the only way to counter it is with facts.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 03:24 PM
2

Jesus wept.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 03:23 PM
13

Excellent. Now we just have to include literal poisoning. Leave the kids alone!
/r/MensRights01/12/18 03:12 PM
16

Feminism has ruined literally everything.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 10:47 AM
2

The effects are 100% reversible, and does not cause sterilization. Oh really? What medical school did you go to? You're a board certified endocrinologist? Bullshit, 1000% politicized, activist bullshit. Anyone with even the slightest familiarity with the existing research knows that it is not possible to make your quoted statement, that we haven't been tinkering, (read: fucking with), the sexual development of children long enough to know even the first thing about long term effects. Stop politi…
/r/MensRights28/11/18 08:09 PM
1

In 2 years, he could be chemically castrated if his mother gets her way, so you're not entirely correct.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 08:01 PM
6

How "scientific consensus" is politicized and manufactured.The history of the terrible fraud that is "transgender medicine". It has its roots in the "free love", feminist 60s and was originated by a few, (undoubtedly mentally ill), self-appointed "specialists".
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:58 PM
4

I'd be fine with that, except we now live in a timeline in which we're supposed to believe all women, it's okay to hate men, and the scientific "consensus" around transgenderism is manufactured and heavily politicized against anything but transitioning. I'm not going to apologize for being unwilling to leave the physical and psychological well-being of male children in the hands of women and pediatricians in this environment.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:33 PM
2

"It's better for 10 guilty to go free than 1 innocent to suffer" is a basic principle of presumption of innocence and main feature of liberal democracy. Something is going on here that is not being well-characterized, and it's frightening because it's much bigger than just feminism and reminds me of the way I felt listening to polled voters in the run up to Trump's election. I keep on encountering people who reject basic precepts which I would have thought unquestioned for all time, like free sp…
/r/MensRights28/11/18 05:50 PM
1

Uh...you know your state is the reason for the proliferation of gender neutral bathrooms everywhere, right?
/r/MensRights25/11/18 09:00 PM
1

More like a new, SJW-focused Babylon Bee.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 08:54 PM
1

Wow, compelling commentary...nuanced and rich.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 08:41 PM
2

Who wants rape sex? Fucking psychopaths, that's who.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 11:59 PM
2

What's often left out of that part if where said slaves came from, and who sold them, in the first place... Or who's STILL selling them.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 11:57 PM
1

If you think a life turned over to nihilism is bound to make you happier, go for it, but most people would be better off risking the pain and making the sacrifices necessary to build a family together. Sure, there are no guarantees that your partner won't turn out to be a shallow douchebag who turns on you, (no less so for women than for men), but you can hedge your bets: take it extremely slowly, feel out his/her character, make it hard for anyone shallow or self-serving to stick around, make s…
/r/MensRights22/11/18 03:31 PM
2

Also.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 02:10 AM
7

I'm an older ex-feminist. They are the crazy ones. Keep your chin up, your opinions to yourself, and your nose to the grindstone. If pressed, pretend agreement, then withdraw. There is nothing to be gained from arguing with lunatics. Succeed, find a nice conservative woman to make a life with, and have a large family. Outbreed the madmen; their belief system leads to sterility and death. Don't give them a second of your time, or any more of your headspace.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 01:27 AM
4

Send only female journalists to conflict areas. They get the acclaim that comes with that and sometimes they die.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 10:04 PM
1

That's a good question. I think the very best answer is it took the bulk of ordinary, normal men with a liberal bent who had no reason to imagine the insanity they were unleashing and no way to argue against cultural Marxist interpretations of the interactions between men and women. The world had never seen feminism or Marxism before. Now we have, and there's no excuse for not rooting it out after engaging with and summarily destroying its "logic".
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:41 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights18/11/18 05:52 PM
1

they have zero understanding of basic law even by my standards they have no understanding of human rights either. They are outcome focused...i.e. the ends justify ANY means.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 05:51 PM
1

Wait...what? Since when?
/r/MensRights18/11/18 05:50 PM
3

Yeah. Any discussion beyond this unnecessary.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 05:50 PM
22

Serious answer: Just complement a piece of her outfit, ("that's a pretty blouse, pair of earrings, etc."), or a component of her look, ("is that a new haircut/style? It suits you.") Also, just as with anything, I'd err on the side of giving to those who'd appreciate the gift: the level-headed, the reasonable. In this case, the married, older, more mature women.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 05:47 PM
1

They just dismiss it as "that wasn't real socialism". If taught correctly, such a conclusion isn't an option.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 05:20 PM
1

There's already things in place for it. We don't need to strike some interference balance with government to deal with that. Oh, I see why you've been acting like there's a bug up your butt: nobody but you said anything about government regulation. My original statement was about having communal historical knowledge of what toxic collectivism and individualism looks like, so that they, unlike the forms of feminism currently running amok, would be socially censured/prevented. A better example sti…
/r/MensRights18/11/18 03:24 PM
2

You can be individualistic and cooperative. I didn't say you couldn't be indivdualistic; I said that there exists a level of individualism that is toxic.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 02:25 AM
4

Social species who live in collaborative groupings require a certain minimal amount of cooperation.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 06:19 PM
6

Agreed. Strong knowledge of history a plus, to guard against malignant individualism + collectivism.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 01:44 PM
5

In a very real sense, they're not wrong: it was a society run by men which passed the 19th amendment - just a certain kind of men. It was a society run by men which tolerated + facilitated the rise and success of the feminist movement. It's a bit of a sticky-wicket: where to draw the line on freedom without erring on the side of totalitarianism or barbarism?
/r/MensRights17/11/18 01:16 PM
14

Projection much /u/kn0thing?
/r/MensRights17/11/18 01:06 PM
3

Disgusting pieces of shit.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 01:06 PM
1

How can you brag about emancipating women as a man’s accomplishment lmao. Who voted for the 19th, ninny? Women? Good god this is dumb.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:26 AM
17

Let's see, they abolished slavery in the West, DRASTICALLY improved working conditions for the common man, emancipated women, ended child labor, separated church and state, strengthened civil rights and the free press, and presided over the greatest reduction in world poverty in all of human history...but sure, I bet someone else would have done better. 🙄
/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:36 PM
1

Once the man explained that he had been cutting through the woman’s clothes in order to use the AED, he was not questioned any further. Thank god for that.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 03:31 PM
1

The removal of a woman’s clothes particularly the bra before using a defibrillator seems to be the largest source of the problem but I’ve never heard of of it going beyond the complainer You've heard of a complainer? Who TF complains about that?
/r/MensRights12/11/18 12:52 AM
7

So far medicine still largely cares more about biology than whacko lefty indoctrination, so my guess is that the healthcare professionals would tell the feminist to STFU and BTFO of a conversation in which feminism is as irrelevant as it is possible for a thing to be.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 08:01 PM
2

As long as they're not lovingly cupped over each breast, you're good.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 07:54 PM
5

Healthcare pro checking in: rescue breathing, (i.e. mouth-to-mouth) is no longer a part of layman's CPR. All you gotta do is chest compressions, which if done correctly, often result in fractured ribs. Ain't no one gonna confuse that with sexual assault.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 06:28 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 07:56 PM
2

Either approach accomplishes the goal of avoiding an echo chamber, but being subscribed implies support I'm unwilling to lend. It's actually important.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 01:40 PM
9

Unsubscribing doesn't prevent you from visiting or reading. As for 2 X chromosomes specifically, that sub is a complete and utter waste of time, not an opportunity to hear well-reasoned arguments. I consider it a badge of honor to be banned, and I actually have 2 X chromosomes.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 11:34 AM
2

While I am banned, a badge I wear with pride!
/r/MensRights06/11/18 10:00 AM
4

Are you handcuffed to a radiator? Unsubscribe that shit.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 09:59 AM
3

Not if they have any self respect and immediately unsubscribe.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 09:58 AM
2

What a lunatic.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 12:17 AM
1

Why don't you just address their argument instead of playing dumb? Their argument is 1000% irrelevant to the discussion...so much so it would not at all be clear why they chose to answer me with it except I've been exposed to mentally ill cultural Marxists a LOT lately. I refuse to dignify that GARBAGE with a substantive response.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 09:50 PM
0

Why are you conflating normal sexual attraction with assault? We are talking about attraction and sexual desire. Not sure why you and others insist on conflating that with assault...oh wait, yes I am: you're either not very bright or a brainwashed ideologue. Men and women both are capable of expressing their attraction without tackling the object of their desire, (e.g. by writing a harmless love note). Bringing up assault as though that's in any way relevant says a LOT about you and nothing else…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 09:46 PM
1

Youre male nature I'm a woman, you moron.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:38 PM
2

wat. The context is a 9 year old writing a love note. The context is male affection and attraction. How fucked in the head do you have to be to get from that to forced sex? You're repulsive.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:36 PM
4

True. But women aren't being demonized, so who cares?
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:18 PM
1

What part of protection involves rape? TF does that have to do with anything. <--- rhetorical question, it doesn't, you're a brainwashed ideologue who has conflated all men with rape. Or being classed as the smaller, physically weaker creature? I could launch into a discussion of the thin veneer of civilization, normal distributions, and the relative strengths of women versus men, but you're a waste of my time, and I'm not talking to you. You were born a woman with only so many trips around the …
/r/MensRights30/10/18 07:47 PM
19

The solution to this is to obliterate the mind-body distinction: it's only because these idiots believe humans are bodies (hardware), run by entirely malleable minds, (software of our choosing), that it never occurs to them that (shocker) men have an ineluctable drive to mate, and more often than not, that drive is going to be directed at women. It's why it never occurs to them that not only is this an inescapable part of the human condition, but also why they never try to see how it could be a …
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:45 PM
2

I've play smacked a guy on the arm/hand, but never any harder than I'd be perfectly fine with them doing to me, and never out of malice/anger/frustration. Should I feel bad/stop? Examples: they're poaching food while I'm cooking. I smack their hand away. Or, guy is intentionally giving me a hard time to flirt, (i.e. being play insulting/difficult), I lightly smack/play punch him on the arm. I kinda think about this the way I do juvenile predator animals, (wolves, tigers, bears), play fighting: c…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter