TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nuditarian Archive

View 0 posts and 74 comments by nuditarian on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

What is the lack of male-specific resources that you're referring to? The death rate differential is certainly interesting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 06:24 AM
1

Do you think this("sex is probably not even one of the most important factors . . .") is a true statement everywhere on earth, or just in the US (guessing based on D'oh!)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 05:28 AM
3

Do you think actively working to build a sense of deep fraternity with male friends could improve male loneliness? What ideas are out there for addressing male sexlessness?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/23 05:54 AM
3

Genuinely curious how you view this nuance, but "Two-thirds of staff sexual misconduct reported by male youth did not involve force or coercion". This puts the percentages of forced/coerced incidents much closer, though still with more male youth reporting coerced sexual acts. The psychology behind boys vs girls confirming coercion is pretty layered. Where is the data that 91% of incidents involved only female staff? I couldn't find that in the full report. I was just skimming for the word 'staf…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/22 05:44 PM
0

Do you have references to confirm what you are saying? It looks like Ukranian law at least specifies that women are subject to conscription: Women who are fit for military service due to their health and age and who have graduated from professional (vocational-technical), professional pre-higher or higher education institutions and have obtained a medical or pharmaceutical specialty, are subject to being included in the military register of conscripts. Women who have a specialty and/or professio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/22 06:49 AM
1

I was speaking about the US, but my follow up statement was that there should be protest. It's a fair statement that if men can be conscripted for duty, women should be conscripted as well. I believe there IS actually some level of conscription of women in Ukraine, but I don't have the details. To be clear, there has NOT been an example of this "not actually happening" in the US.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/22 03:38 PM
2

Genuinely, great point. In principle, though, it still highlights the disparity. Even if it was only for 8 years, it's part of a pattern. Financial independence IS independence. And OP did ask for evidence of prior oppressions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/22 03:20 PM
1

And? I don't hear anyone arguing for women to be guaranteed freedom from risk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/22 08:45 AM
3

The generalization that I feel you are discounting, is that women's rights regarding property was "less than" men's rights. Clearly my statement that "women couldn't own property" is far too broad of a statement. My revised statement would be that women's rights regarding control of property was "less than" that of men. I would further state that this "lesser" property control would be a "disadvantage" of unresolved impact. You are asking for evidence of such, which IMO presents that you don't b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/22 08:23 AM
3

Classism seems to be a common theme here, and I'm totally down with the perspective that wealth disparity is probably the greatest challenge of our age. What I don't understand is why much discussion here is framed to downplay the struggle of women, rather than simply elevating the discussion of the struggle of people of modest means, and then specifically the struggle of men of modest means.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/22 08:08 AM
2

If you consider having little control over your own destiny safe, then I guess? A prisoner in solitary confinement is "safe".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/22 08:00 AM
2

What I've been reading is that a concept called "Coverture", based on British law, meant that single women could own property, but as soon as a woman was married, all property was functionally controlled by her husband. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coverture
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/22 07:57 AM
3

Agreed, and also agreed that shame is a major issue. I don't think promotion is fundamentally a problem, but the WAY that sex is promoted is problematic. At this point, given the ubiquity of media consumption in the US, promotion largely shapes our culture and the impetus for promotion is NOT wholesome or culturally positive. Sex sells. Violence sells. Extremity sells. You say "promoting sex as great status value", I say "promoting sex as central focus for men". Pretty sure we're talking about t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/22 05:10 PM
6

I agree in the importance of recognizing libido as a rooted in physiology, but the social construct is in how we are conditioned to ACT on our libido. Humans have the ability to moderate their libido. Perceptions about social norms influence men's willingness and/or ability to moderate. Physiology also influences it. Nature and Nurture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/22 04:39 PM
1

IMO, the important part of the statement is "society promoting sex . . . is a real problem . . ." Men need other ways to feel fulfilled. They need other ways to feel cared for and feel community. IMO, in the US, the image of what it means to be a man is hollow and needs to change.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/22 04:32 PM
5

OP specifically asked "what oppressions DID women deal with in the past". Personally, I believe this question belies a belief that women weren't really oppressed, especially given how easy it is to find glaring evidence to the contrary. If you really want to elevate issues where particular men were/are unduly burdened (e.g. conscription, e.g. men without money and power), it's important that we don't do so at the expense of others who were/are oppressed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/22 04:19 PM
0

I'm pretty sure women weren't "opting" to not vote so they could draft dodge, but I don't disagree that there is a disparity. You also are pointing out a few more: 1948 - Women allowed in the military, primarily in medical roles 1996 - Women allowed in all roles except combat 2015 - Ban on women in combat roles lifted If there ever is a draft in the US again, I would expect that women would be drafted just as men. If they are not, there should be protest. That said, you have to acknowledge that …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/22 04:11 PM
1

Is your premise that you don't believe that women were historically shut out of education venues, or are you talking about something more nuanced? My general sense is that private universities on the east coast were much slower to change, public universities or schools in the west either quickly adapted to including women, or always did. Ohio State has allowed women students since it's founding in 1873 MIT allowed women to enroll in 1882, it was founded in 1861. U of North Carolina, 1897 Princet…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/22 06:09 AM
8

Umm, not having the right to vote(19th amendment, 1919)? Not having the right to own property in many states(until 1900ish?)? Not being able to apply for credit cards without their husbands signature(apparently until around 1970)? Are you talking about something more subtle here, because it sure sounds like you are discounting significant and obvious history. Or are you talking about less distant past?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/22 05:48 AM
1

No, but I theoretically could be.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 03:04 AM
1

They basically said that it didn’t like being assholes as if putting the comfort of your dick and balls above considering some one without said dick and balls is shitty and inconsiderate. There, fixed that for you. It's almost like you weren't listening, crazy.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 12:27 AM
13

Anecdotally, I've also been in positions of authority/status, working with ~35% female leader cohort & 65% male leader cohort. I saw no difference in their willingness to reciprocate support. I think an individuals willingness to reciprocate support is a reflection of their individual character, not something inherent in their gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/22 02:53 PM
5

I wish this was concept was touted more. I would clarify that there ARE attributes that are related to having a Y chromosome, they are the statistical nature, but that all of the roles that are associated are generalizations. It's not nature vs nurture, it's clearly both, and it IS something that can be parsed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/22 02:48 PM
1

Is the paper actually published somewhere? 3x to 15x is a pretty absurdly broad range without context.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/22 08:44 AM
3

First of all, I sincerely hope for your sake that your symptoms turn out to be something else. ALS at your age is an exceedingly rare diagnosis (you probably already know this), so hopefully there is hope! I've experienced some symptoms that could be described as early ALS symptoms as well, for about the last 4 years. Docs basically say there isn't much they can determine, unless things progress, and at this stage there are potential benign diagnoses as well. Sincerely feel for the emotional tur…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/22 08:37 AM
-1

My personal experience, observing misogyny in management in my workplace for about 10 years, is that those instances of misogyny that MIGHT be cast as projected misandry(given the merits of the women's complaint) were perpetrated by a male leader who ultimately proved to be a misogynist. I personally witnessed this individual act out his misogyny on 8 or 10 occasions, and am aware of far more through hearsay. This organization is around 33% women in leadership. Of the men in leadership, I witnes…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/22 05:44 AM
-11

I still think that, given the male physiology, honing the benefits afforded by increased testosterone while avoiding the pitfalls, should be a core part of being a man. Strength, fortitude, resilience, daring, bravery, I'm sure there's more, have roots in testosterone. The challenge of our time is finding ways to leverage those traits and excel without having to oppress others in the process. (Not saying that in a purist sense, I understand that for one to excel, often someone has to falter or a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/22 06:53 AM
-5

It's unfortunately that you are already going to throw out that an opposing idea is "incredibly stupid" when you admit you don't even understand what I'm saying. Clearly our experiences are vastly different. I'll admit, I have a hard time believing you when you claim that you have plenty (which I would take to mean 5-10) of male friends who have been abused or raped by women. I don't believe your experiences are narrow. I don't know you in the slightest, I have no basis to say anything about wha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/22 06:14 AM
-2

The disparity that you are stepping past is that a loss of bodily autonomy for a man has a less dire impact. If you consider nothing other than the impact of pregnancy, a woman's paths (abortion, carry + labor + adoption, carry + labor + parenting) have a much higher direct burden. So men don't have equivalent rights in the reproductive space because they don't need them. I agree that there is no getting away from a gender divide. Men and women are different. The best we can hope for is to minim…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 07:53 PM
-5

What this makes me think of is that "Male Advocates" should do a better job of mentoring men that act in ways that are destructive within our society. I've been engaging in argument where the foundation of the argument I'm opposing appears to be that men are grossly underrepresented as victims, and grossly overrepresented as perpetrators. Why not focus on what we can do to stop men from raping or assaulting or <pickSomeOtherIssue>, then we could just as well talk about what we can do to reduce m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 07:43 PM
-3

Would you agree that it would be useful to just stop using the terms masculinity and femininity, which are clearly gendered terms, and just talk about the personality traits themselves? Then by extension, if we could get to the point where the personality traits are clearly understood as something that is not strictly generalized re: gender, we could also talk about how biology impacts those traits? One thing I am observing here(LeftWingMaleAdvocates) is that it seems like all arguments are very…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 07:23 PM
2

Is there a reason you are answering a question with a question?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 07:06 PM
1

Do you support unfettered access to abortion? Once a baby is born, do you think that men or women should be able to withdraw consent to support? Guilt free?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 06:01 PM
-7

Have you ever had a man seek refuge in your household due to abuse suffered at the hands of a woman? Have you known anyone to have this happen? It seems to me that you are focusing on a narrow defensible position, that men are underrepresented in statistics, literature, support regarding domestic violence or abuse, but you fail to demonstrate why this matters. What is the outcome. Can you demonstrate how men are broadly disadvantaged in society as a result?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 05:24 PM
0

Do you believe that through abortion, women have the power to separate sex from becoming a parent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 04:55 PM
-7

What do you mean "in DV provision we never had parity to start with"? Claiming that women have more power in society than men is a pretty bold statement. It would seem to me that there are LOTS of easily observable facts that contradict this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 09:41 AM
-2

Yeah, I know what the word consent means. I'm not saying responsibility can be swapped in without a change in meaning. Not sure what you mean when you say "But it's circular". IMO a paper abortion is someone explicitly NOT taking responsibility for their actions. What did I misconstrue?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 09:35 AM
-1

'If you're consenting to sex, you're consenting to fatherhood.' I've never really heard this point, and I don't really see how it makes sense. The point I always heard was "If you think you are responsible enough to have sex, than you better be responsible enough to be a father" Using the term "consent" in relation to women and sex, is rooted in the prevalence of women experiencing sexual assault/rape, aka penetration without consent. Using the term "consent" in relation to men and sex, implies …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 08:50 AM
1

Yes, I am arguing that male suspects, because they are statistically more likely to be perpetrators of certain types of offenses, are LESS likely to be given benefit of the doubt (room/latitude). And I'm arguing that this likely skews the statistics and disadvantages a very small subset of perpetrators. And there will be no way of gathering that statistic. But my WAG is that it means that instead of mean being 96% of the problem, maybe they are 95% of the problem. Or 92%. Or hell, maybe even 85%…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 08:34 AM
-2

Genuine question, what is your actual point? I skimmed the 4 links and what I'm gathering: Stats about relationship violence show that men and women are equally aggressors, but men just do more damage. Men are underachieving in College and need help. There are lots of degree programs in UK where there are more women than men in the program. Is this the point you are trying to make? Do you believe that we have gone past gender equality and that women now hold more power in society than men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/22 08:03 AM
3

There's a window of time where it's considered acceptable, and some outlier situations. 20/30 somethings giving back to alma mater Highschool/middleschool for an activity that they were passionate about (sports, art, tech), or doing the same as part of community programs Dads volunteering around the same, sports, school programs, community programs, etc. I think part of it is that by 30/40, you are expected to be engaging with YOUR family, and if you are not, you are a creepy dude or weird gal. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/22 11:31 PM
1

I totally agree that the optics WOULDN'T be interchangeable. Again, unfair, but not unreasonable. Female perps would get more room, in part because of optics and cultural perspectives, in part because they are not the root of the problem. I'm not arguing that this sort of cultural bias doesn't skew the statistics. I'm arguing that it doesn't skew a 50/50 problem into a 96/4 problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/22 11:23 PM
0

Texas DPS, 2020 crime report. Presumably this is a neutral source, though you can claim that it's a result of institutional bias against men, after which we can argue about the sun revolving around the earth. https://www.dps.texas.gov/sites/default/files/documents/crimereports/20/2020cit.pdf Page 106, 95.5% of sexual assault offenders were male. There are some specific breakdowns on victim age, but there isn't a specific breakdown on child sex abusers. But here again, I think it is wildly unlike…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/22 05:20 PM
1

Take a look at https://www.ywca.org/wp-content/uploads/WWV-CSA-Fact-Sheet-Final.pdf This is the easiest to find, and I didn't originally post it because I figured it would be disregarded. Take a look at the reference section. There are 17 cited sources. Are ANY of those sources you would consider unbiased?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/22 04:56 PM
1

If this is a discussion we should be having, can you site some source that indicates that women are the primary aggressors, women are the primary child molestors, inciters of violence against men? I truly do understand the need to keep assumptions at bay, but implying that men aren't the primary problem when it comes to sexual violence, relationship abuse, seems pretty much like arguing that the earth is flat(or having your head in the sand). In my local community, I can rattle off an array of i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/22 04:51 PM
1

Sources are easy to find, but I assume you won't accept anything that has anything to do with supporting women. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/saycrle.pdf "Nearly all of the offenders in sexual assaults reported to law enforcement were male (96%). Female offenders were most common in assaults against victims under age 6. For these youngest victims, 12% of offenders were females, compared with 6% for victims ages 6 through 12, and 3% for victims ages 12 through 17. Overall, 6% of the offende…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/22 07:32 AM
1

No I totally think it's unfair, I just don't think its unreasonable. I'm not sure what your point is about your sister. I think with any case of children potentially abusing children, there is a lot of nuance and the legal system probably takes a lot into consideration. Was this the only time, what was the context? Was she helping the kid with something, clothes change, bathroom, ?, or did she just saunter up and grab the kids junk for no reason? Are we talking about a 13 year old or a 19 year o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 06:46 PM
1

Not true regarding child support. In some states it is court determined. You could say the obligation doesn’t end, because those court orders can change if the financial situation changes, but it can be a situation where the non custodial parent has no burden. The OP was talking about adoption, so I wasn’t factoring abortion into the conversation. As to choice and responsibility, since we were talking about fairness and compensation, I still think the woman’s burden is greater. If we were agreei…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 04:44 PM
1

Because the man’s “effort” in the equation is about 2 minutes, and by most accounts more enjoyable that the woman’s 9 month commitment. I don’t know if that’s the case in all states. I believe there are places where the noncustodial parent may not have a financial burden if the custodial parent does not have a financial need.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 04:03 PM
-1

Assuming the father is fit to parent, I know in some states child care responsibilities are determined by custody and income of both parents. At this point, given that there is still a distinct pay gap between genders as well as a gap between status/pay of a stay at home parent vs their paid spouse, I think that’s fair. So if the mother is in the stronger financial position then absolutely she should be responsible for child support. Again, assuming this is a child of choice. Charging a penalty …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 03:31 PM
14

15 years is nothing when it comes to clinical depression. If she never turned things around it could totally be the "source". Medicine talks about depression like it's an event, but it's really a long path. Knowing where issues started is difficult, and getting back to somewhere positive can be near impossible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 01:33 PM
12

Does this mean I don't have to do the dishes?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 01:00 PM
0

Are you saying that non-asshole, tough men are incapable of going to war? I probably shouldn't use that term(toxic masculinity), as I've got my own definition for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 06:41 AM
4

Whoah, that's a big jump. I didn't say that gender is a social construct. What I'm saying is that many of the purported traits surrounding gender are exactly that. Let me make that clear from another angle, I don't believe that gender is a fluid social construct. I believe that gender is rooted in biology. I also believe that there is a social movement that is using language that should be about biology as a means to advance a social belief. I actually don't have a fully formed opinion on that s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 06:32 AM
1

But you are actually drawing that comparison, which in my opinion is far flung enough that what you are doing is propagandizing. You are juxtaposing something you dislike (which is fine, I'm a big fan of debate) with something that is broadly seen as evil. Did you say something about integrity?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 06:15 AM
1

APA guidelines for the treatment of boys and men Thanks for posting that. I had some knee jerk reaction to some of it (like thinking anti-female while reading anti-femininity), but much of that seems spot on. I personally think those that what to push a "masculine" ideal should ditch the term, focus on the positive traits (achievement, adventure, risk, perseverance a.k.a eschewal of the appearance of weakness) and ditch the negative aspects that are so often seen together (all the isms, emotiona…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 06:11 AM
1

So you are comparing a marriage counselor's purported prioritization of women rights to the Nazi's killing 6 million jews?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 05:54 AM
6

What is masculinity outside of physical characteristics? (I'm assuming male physical traits aren't demonized anywhere)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 05:50 AM
1

I'm not saying it's totally fair, but 80-90% of child molestors are men, so I think the "stranger danger" thing is way more of a concern with men than women. I don't think it's anything to do with a man appearing feminine. That said, I believe there is also propaganda that attempts to tie homosexuality to child sex abuse, even though the vast majority(80%?) of male abusers are heterosexual. So there may be a cultural phenomenon at play that makes people even more suspicious of an effeminate man …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 04:01 AM
1

Simplest point being the last, yes I would think it was reasonable to prioritize supporting men for an issue, if the overwhelming majority of those impacted were men. So if 85% of suicides were men, I think it would be fair. Looks like white men account for about 70% of suicides, so yeah I do think it would be fair if there was a focus on white men. Looks like stats for homelessness are similar, so yeah I'd say same thing. Given that men statistically end up in more dangerous work environments, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 03:43 AM
1

So are you saying "Woman goes to give up infant, refuses to give name of father, has to pay 100% of child support" and alternatively "Woman goes to give up infant, gives the name of the father, woman pays 50% and man pays 50%"? Does the woman get any credit for work done carrying a baby for 9 months?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 01:57 AM
3

This is a pretty decent tool for working through balance with this stuff, https://www.fairplaylife.com/. The nuance is coming to agreement about what needs to be prioritized and what can fall to the wayside. I can also say it didn't work in our household because we don't fit the mold, spouse and I both do too much work ourselves and there was no card for much of the work that we split. But the idea was useful in terms of communicating about what is a priority. Ultimately the premise is that ther…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 01:50 AM
1

My other points aside, if your goal was to win an argument, bravo! The first doc I looked at, which was an overview of their program, was largely gender neutral. Their website is not and they explain why.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 01:45 AM
0

OK, they address this in their FAQ. https://www.theduluthmodel.org/what-is-the-duluth-model/frequently-asked-questions/ They don't assume that men are the aggressors, but statistically speaking they are more likely to be, by a significant margin (85% of criminal assaults perp'd by men, women 350% more likely to be murdered in domestic homicide) So they are making a point, men still by in large are the aggressors so their language is not entirely gender neutral. From what I'm seeing, about 50% of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 01:43 AM
0

So I'm reading more directly on their site(https://www.theduluthmodel.org), but I have to ask, do you actually think that men are victimized by women anywhere near as frequently as women are victimized by men? Like, I was doing some cross checking with CDC, and come across the stat that 20% of women in this country have been raped at some point in their life(that's forcible rape(12%) + alchohol involved rape(8%). I know that men are abused, but the numbers are no where near this, and much of the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 01:20 AM
1

I'd probably go for "Real men don't cry", I don't think men beating a woman has been a pre-req for manhood. Certainly it's less tolerated now. Totally agree with the fact that masculinity and femininity are just ideas. IMO we need to stop using those terms and describe the behaviors (which don't have much to do with gender). Those terms are sort of meaningless now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/22 05:22 PM
1

I see the reference to 'men who batter'. Not disagreeing there. I'm focused on the claim that it says "men are the primary aggressor". Where does it say that? It's a 4 page document.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/22 04:14 PM
1

men are the primary aggressor It's not gaslighting, I literally can't find the references you guys are claiming are there. I linked to a 4 page doc, and two people are saying that it references men as primary aggressors, but I've read it like 4 times, and just searched the doc, and it never makes such a statement. Looking at the doc that I linked, the Duluth model does NOT specifically call out men as the primary aggressor.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/22 04:10 PM
4

There's a cliche, think globally, act locally. Unless you're sitting on a billion dollars and slumming on Reddit, then talking about "the patriarchy" is a waste of time. Look at your local power structures(your job, your local council, your friend group, your community), which may or may not be patriarchal, and act at that level. Hierarchy is going to exist, it's how shit gets done. An effective hierarchy is built on the respect of ALL levels of the hierarchy and is only "exerted" for the purpos…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/22 06:33 AM
0

I don't actually see where they define primary aggressor. There is no mention of who "poses the most serious, ongoing threat". Are you looking at a different doc?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/22 11:31 PM
0

The doc doesn't actually say men are the aggressors. It uses the term primary aggressor. So if it doesn't call out men, why would it call out women?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/22 11:26 PM
10

What I see in the current state of debate is that those who might be looking for real middle ground are still using language rooted in extremity and bias. For someone who is looking for a middle ground, what exactly is "masculinity"? Toughness? Independence? Cockiness? Dominance? All of those things can refer to anyone, they have nothing to do with being male. Until we get to the point of describing behaviors across the board in a non-gendered way, we're going to be stuck ping ponging between ex…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/22 07:42 PM
-2

Where exactly does it assume that? I only see references to "primary aggressors" and "victims"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/22 06:14 PM
-2

I'd never heard of the Duluth Model, looked it up, https://www.theduluthmodel.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Definition-of-Duluth-Model-June-2015.pdf, what exactly is in here that is hurtful to men in general?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/22 04:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter