TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nuker1110 Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by nuker1110 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

That may be how it started, but it has come to cover “heinous injustice against some in the name of ‘equality’ for others”
/r/MensRights16/04/24 10:06 PM
1

A joke in 2001. A “legitimate” question in 2021.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/21 08:37 PM
3

And your strawman bastardization of my analogy is as ridiculous as your argument is to me. I fervently believe a woman has no right to infringe on her child’s fundamental right to life itself. As stated in the US Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson, “... among these [inalienable rights] are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.” That unborn child has done nothing to warrant the termination of its right to life, aside from existing under your worldview.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 05:23 AM
3

A baby is an unwanted effect of recreational sex And jail time is an unwanted effect of robbing a store. Consequence is not a buffet, where you can pick and choose what you want. It’s an all-or-nothing deal. And that’s not up to you. That’s why I vote for representatives whose views align with my own, to pass laws with which I can agree. killing an unrelated someone that would otherwise stay alive... Such as a healthy baby that would otherwise survive to term and grow into a functional adult?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 04:49 AM
5

Personal responsibility means each person is responsible for the consequences of their own actions. Once a child is conceived, as a direct result of consensual intercourse, the mother’s autonomy does not include ending that developing life. It’s not hers to end.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 03:26 AM
3

You also have the autonomy to not have sex in the first place. I negate the risk of killing someone while driving drunk by not driving drunk. Why should there be any difference there? Freedom of Choice is NOT freedom from consequences.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 03:19 AM
6

I do believe both parties share responsibility. It takes two to tango, as they say. Contraceptives are A-OK in my book, but with the stipulated emphasis that they can fail, and do so often enough to warrant using multiple compatible options every time. I don’t believe a police report should be required for plan b pills, because shit happens. Condoms break. Hormonal birth control loses effectiveness. The list goes on. There’s a long enough window of opportunity for a morning-after pill to cover m…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 01:46 AM
3

I’m not telling people to give up sex. I’m stating that doing so will prevent pregnancy. I am a classical Personal Responsibility conservative, and I stand by my statement.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 01:26 AM
-3

The funny thing about Bodily Autonomy in regards to pregnancy is that there’s a sure-fire, guaranteed, 100% effective way for a woman to prevent it: ABSTINENCE. If nobody nuts inside you, you can’t get pregnant. Unless you’re the Virgin Mary or something, but I digress. Noted, this doesn’t account for Rape, but then there should be a police report and a morning-after pill option.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 12:40 AM
19

The people that proposed it fully intended this result. These people have been working to “knock men off their pedestal,” so to speak, for decades, near a century.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 08:35 PM
6

IMO, the Egard ad is less a push, more a croquet mallet from hell. Launch that puppy!
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:48 AM
26

It can honestly be applied to most people on either side, as the majority of the general public don't think for themselves and just repeat whatever their chosen sources tell them.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 04:52 PM
53

It refers to the constant regurgitation of the same talking points, like a video game character with the same preprogrammed lines every time you interact with them.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 04:25 PM
3

Going by those numbers, less than half of people who get married in the first place (which number is declining) get divorced, and how many of those who do get married a second time? I don't think a simple average is sufficient for this type of problem. Edit: later in the article it says that less than a quarter each of US men and women have ever been divorced.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:46 PM
2

Source on that 60% divorcee rate? That seems astronomical.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:56 PM
2

No worries. The fact that you’re not trying to be actively antagonistic makes you OK in my book.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:56 PM
2

Modern church leaders have actually clarified that there is no prohibition against soda, or even caffeine specifically. Just coffee and tea.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:17 PM
1

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. (Emphasis mine) Congress is the only entity restricted thusly.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 12:15 AM
3

I’ve heard it said that “Boys never truly ‘grow up’, their toys just get bigger and more expensive.” Condescending overtones aside, I think there’s some truth to it. We never outgrow the need for some kind of “play.”
/r/MensRights25/04/18 02:06 AM
6

My only response.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 01:36 PM
3

I'd say they're designed by misanthropes, not misandrists specifically. NOBODY could find those seats comfortable at a natural body size/shape, at least on my local public transit.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:41 PM
1

I'd settle for either/or.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:38 AM
2

Also true.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 06:44 PM
1

I actually can't find any news articles on the topic, but still...
/r/MensRights28/06/17 05:16 PM
2

Oh, you'd still get jumped. The white knights would just be fueled by crazy and meds along with the testosterone.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 03:33 PM
14

I think this falls into a similar vein to Jury Nullification, where a jury can deliver a verdict in opposition to evidence as a protest against an unjust law. Then again, I'm just an average southern Joe that would probably have volunteered as the dad's spotter.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 03:30 PM
2

Teaching.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:48 AM
1

Dr. Ben Carson disagrees with at least one of those points.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 02:45 PM
3

Omega is supposed to have the meaning of "last" or "final" IIRC. Also yes.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 08:05 PM
1

And people have been mocking NAMBLA for decades...
/r/MensRights18/12/16 07:44 AM
5

The way I see it, Brexit (the decision) was not unpredictable, the leaders who didn't see it coming were just out of touch AS ALL FUCKING GET-OUT. Just like the American MSM.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 08:22 AM
6

We want to feel safe walking the streets at night. Yeah, walking the streets at night is INHERENTLY unsafe. Yes, women are sometimes raped walking around alone at night. Ya know what men get in the same goddamn situation? Shot. Stabbed. Women are more likely to walk away with their life than men are.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:53 PM
3

If this was in Texas, the father would have shot him a half-dozen times and gotten off scot-free.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 05:21 PM
1

Excuse me for not wanting someone fighting next to me that can't haul my wounded ass back to safety if needed. If I go down, ANY soldier must be capable of bringing me back to base, or the entire point of "No man left behind" is rendered null.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 02:42 AM
5

Until you read the last line?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 08:16 PM
3

How about "Interpersonal culpability is not transferable"?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 02:25 PM
6

/r/dwarffortress would like a word...
/r/MensRights28/02/13 03:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter