nulspace Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. You started this thread by saying: "Shared" assets. Funny how this reasoning oozed out of the divorce industry whose various parasites' livelihoods just so happen to depend on this sort of viewpint" At least now you acknowledge that she is entitled to a share of the assets, depending on the circumstances in which they were acquired. Cheers.	/r/MensRights	27/03/17 06:31 PM
2	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. I'm not going to argue about this, but I want to add just a few things: I'm not talking exclusively about his/their business income (I say "his/their" because it's not clear if she was involved). I'm talking about house(s), car(s), furniture, clothing, joint savings accounts, investments, etc. She's entitled to a share of value of all of those types of things, if they were purchased/invested into/etc. after becoming married. That's part of the legal obligation of marriage - you share assets (unl…	/r/MensRights	27/03/17 06:01 PM
3	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. do you honestly think that after 40 years of living together she doesn't have an ownership interest in any property or assets?	/r/MensRights	27/03/17 03:42 PM
2	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. Firstly, she didn't submit the evidence on appeal, they're reviewing the evidence she submitted at trial. Secondly, it says she was a homemaker "in her latter years". And again, finally, it does not say she didn't contribute to the growth of the business.	/r/MensRights	27/03/17 04:54 AM
2	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. But the appeal decision doesn't say that she didn't contribute...? You're not allowed to just assume such an important fact. The trial decision likely states her contribution to the business one way or another, so if you can get a copy of that, then I'd be convinced. edit: I skimmed one of your earlier posts - you were pre-med two years ago, you're smarter than this. Why are you arguing something you have no evidence of?	/r/MensRights	27/03/17 03:25 AM
2	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. Just not to leave with half of their shared assets ftfy	/r/MensRights	27/03/17 03:19 AM
4	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. I'm confused, what do you think it is?	/r/MensRights	27/03/17 03:17 AM
2	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. because that guy couldn't be bothered, here's the law in the UK, taken from the appeal judgment: Section 1 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 [holy shit that's an old act], re-enacting provisions originally in sections 1 and 2 of the Divorce Reform Act 1969, is in the following terms: (1) Subject to section 3 below, a petition for divorce may be presented to the court by either party to a marriage on the ground that the marriage has broken down irretrievably. (2) The court hearing a petition for…	/r/MensRights	27/03/17 03:14 AM
3	Woman cheats on husband, uses that as proof that her marriage is irrevocably broken, and tries to steal half of his stuff in divorce. Court rules against her and media creates a circus. Right, so...have you read that? That's the appeal decision. It turns on a question of law - namely, whether or not the trial judge correctly applied the law of divorce in the UK. It's not very heavy on facts. Can you point me to where in the appeal decision that it says "she contributed nothing" to the business? I see this, at paragraph 4: "During the latter years of the marriage the Respondent has not provided the Petitioner with love, attention or affection and was not supporting of her role a…	/r/MensRights	27/03/17 03:08 AM
2	Afroman - Don't interupt my concert! Trick question; fedoras only exist in a tipped state	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/02/15 10:05 PM
-5	Afroman - Don't interupt my concert! Bye	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/02/15 07:10 PM
-6	Afroman - Don't interupt my concert! lol you fucking idiot. You fucking idiot.	/r/PussyPassDenied	18/02/15 06:19 PM
2	A Queen's student involved in the opposition to a Queen's men's issues group was assaulted late last night It's ridiculous that you're being downvoted. There's very little level-headed discussion here.	/r/MensRights	28/03/14 09:49 PM