TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

numb3red Archive

View 1 posts and 174 comments by numb3red on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
36

Raising Awarenessnumb3red/r/MensRights01/02/15 10:46 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Lol, you have to be pretty fucking dumb to think that that's what clown world is about Make up your mind lol
/r/MensRights09/05/19 12:32 AM
0

https://imgur.com/a/Cx43AZJ
/r/MensRights09/05/19 12:23 AM
-1

Sorry for observing.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 12:20 AM
-1

You don't have to be a white nationalist to meme holocaust denial and race realism? Hmm.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 12:11 AM
-6

"It's just a joke xdd" /s
/r/MensRights08/05/19 05:49 PM
1

I'm really sorry about your persecution complex.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 04:33 AM
0

"Men" is not an oppressed group of people.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 12:26 AM
0

on a specific oppressed group of people Found your problem.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 11:56 PM
-1

The fact that the military is mostly men seems the obvious explanation. I also never said federal prisons were good. The US has a prison problem in general.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 11:41 PM
-3

Corrupt and for-profit prisons that don't care for the well-being of prisoners are responsible for prisoners getting raped in prison. That shouldn't even be a controversial statement.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 11:29 PM
-2

So this is a prison industrial complex issue.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 11:23 PM
-6

But that comparison doesn't apply unless women needed a lot more sleep.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 10:10 PM
1

One of those people who understands the distinction between a fetus and a baby, oooOOOooOOOOoo
/r/MensRights25/04/19 05:57 PM
1

Correct. Please provide evidence that it's legal for women to kill babies.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 04:10 PM
0

The key term I used is "almost exclusively." Women are almost exclusively harassed on the street by men.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 02:00 AM
1

Bullshit, women have valid legal excuses for both. Please provide any evidence that it's legal for women to kill babies.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 01:46 AM
-1

I started talking to different people more, as well as just having more real-world life experience. Statistically, practically, men are not being oppressed. Men have issues, but they're not as bad as minority groups' in general.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 01:44 AM
1

If you'd actually paid attention you'd have seen that it isn't two kids wrestling. The one being pinned clearly isn't playing and is just being bullied. The guy's trying to tail a woman down the street because he thinks she's hot and likes her ass when she's just trying to get on with her day.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 01:41 AM
0

I actually don't think I've ever seen someone strawman and put words in my mouth as hard as you're doing ever before in this sub, and I've gotten into a lot of arguments. No offense but I'm gonna stop responding to you because it's not worth my time if you're gonna claim wild shit like you're busy telling male victims of abuse to check their privilege. And who fights against this idea? Not you obviously somebody who has never lifted a finger to raise awareness of men's issues because you think m…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 01:20 AM
0

Saying #NotAllMen is like saying #AllLivesMatter. In a vacuum they're both true statements, but they're used to dismiss the issues that were being talked about by falsely acting like the people talking about sexism/racism were somehow claiming that "All men are bad" or "Only black lives matter."
/r/MensRights25/04/19 01:17 AM
-2

What would you have boys be? You're interpreting "boys will be boys" literally. It's a vague statement often used to justify bad behavior. In the context of the ad, it's used to justify physically bullying another kid. Would you have boys be bullies? But lets face it, in reality schools, the law and society in general will punish innocent boys for what girls do or claim boy have done. High School girls are falsely accusing boys they don't like of rape today, with no repercussions. So the entire …
/r/MensRights25/04/19 01:03 AM
3

Fair enough. As a capitalist entity, I think Gillette can go fuck itself for trying to co-opt social awareness to sell blades. It's manipulative. But ignoring that, I don't see a problem with the message of the ad.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 12:58 AM
0

You're saying you don't believe that men disproportionately harass women, in comparison to the other way around?
/r/MensRights25/04/19 12:57 AM
-4

Should women also feel a social obligation to shame women who make false rape accusations Yes, but they very rarely happen and are not socially acceptable at all. attack or kill their husbands or kill their babies? Those are all incredibly taboo and illegal.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 12:56 AM
-2

too many black people think it's okay to rape white people, where's that ad? Once again, this isn't a "black people" issue. People of every race commit rape. The reasons why rapes happen aren't tied to race. Too many women think it's okay to abuse or falsely accuse men, where's that ad? Despite what people here would have you believe, false rape accusations are wildly less common than actual rapists going uncharged. They're seriously rare, and even the rare false rape accusation that does happen…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 12:55 AM
-2

Prove any of that. That's a baseless and conspiratorial assumption. You have to ignore Occam's Razor and adopt a victimized worldview to think all these women are out to get you because they're talking about social issues.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 12:15 AM
-7

The ad never said "Men are such bullies who harass women." It's a fact that too many men think it's okay to bully and harass women, but nobody ever said it was all or even most of them. "Some men are good, but not enough" is a good mindset to have because we should strive to have all men be good. Moreover, you have to realize the difference between calling out the socially ingrained problems specific to a disproportionate amount of people in society's dominant group vs. generalizing behaviors do…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 12:13 AM
-2

There aren't any nation-wide social issues that almost exclusively black people perpetuate. The same can't be said for men when it comes to things like harassing women on the street. However, the ad still didn't target all men, or even most men.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 11:51 PM
-14

The commercial addressed a lot of things disproportionately done by men in comparison to women. It never blamed all men. Would you be happier if the commercial showed an equal number of women harassing men on the street as vice versa, or just bewildered? I'd be the latter, because it's not a thing that really happens.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 11:47 PM
-32

How's that? Because they lined up a lot of dads saying "boys will be boys?" I didn't read that as an attack on all men, even less so as some inherency to men, but rather as commentary on the idea of "boys will be boys" being prominent in society. It's true that a lot of older men have some unhealthy views on gender, and it's okay to talk about it without getting triggered and offended.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:58 PM
-9

If you are a male, good or not, you should take responsibility for the shitty behavior of a minority of men and do everything you can to prevent the "inherent toxic masculinity" that comes with being a man... Firstly, you just added the "inherent" part to toxic masculinity. I've never seen anyone say that toxic masculinity "comes with being a man." Rather, it comes from unhealthy and unfair expectations taught to boys from a young age. I really think that MRA's hating the phrase is a big misunde…
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:55 PM
-60

I have never seen parent praise a bully, I have never actually seen a male sezually harass a woman, I have never seen a man openly cat call a woman. Then why do you feel attacked by it? The ad quite explicitly only called out those behaviors, and if you aren't taking part in or witnessing them it wasn't directed at you. EDIT: I don't mind the downvotes, but if one of you would care to actually explain that'd be nice. This whole ad fiasco is one of the most bewildering things I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:22 PM
-2

Holy shit. I'm so close to unsubbing from this dogshit sub.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 04:16 AM
0

That's what she's suggesting, believe it or not.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 04:51 AM
18

Why does this shit have positive karma?
/r/MensRights02/03/19 08:56 PM
-2

Why are people in these circles so much more likely to say "transsexuals" than 'transgender people?"
/r/MensRights28/02/19 05:39 PM
1

I've talked to a lot of feminists and they're adamant on feminism being "equality through women's rights" and that if we have any issue, we should use our own resources and movements for it. I've been told feminism is not about men and trying to even bring it up in a discussion is hijacking. Those people can go fuck off, imo. We need more voices for equality for all in progressive social movements and they're not helping. I've been told in my face my issues can't be talked about because we "live…
/r/MensRights17/02/19 06:17 PM
1

Nobody's saying white people get a medal for being white, just that they get jobs more easily and they get shot less, among other things.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 06:05 PM
2

If the ratio were closer, I would say you have a point, but a 80-20 say that more women attempt suicide, while more men commit suicide. Would you agree that culturally, it's much more accepted and pushed that boys/men should like and own guns than women? Further, would you agree that of all common suicide methods (hanging, jumping off a building, running in front of traffic, etc) death by gunshot and death by overdose of sleeping pills seem the least terrifying and least painful at first glance?…
/r/MensRights17/02/19 01:29 AM
-1

Theres a pretty big leap between... ...attempting it [suicide] to actually end (sic) your own life. How? Explain how women attempting suicide more than men is irrelevant without baseless conjecture. I dont see feminism advocating for women to take those jobs though? Then you're not looking. You must not have even read the article I linked, because it's clearly pro-women-in-construction. I seriously dont understand how you can say its "only 76% of the victims" and how men being the prevalent murd…
/r/MensRights17/02/19 12:19 AM
5

Suicide attempts are between two and four times more frequent among females, and research suggests that suicidal thoughts are more common among females than among males, particularly in those under the age of 25. Women are discouraged and prevented from having the choice to work dangerous jobs, while men are expected to. Men make up 96% of murderers, yet only 79% of victims. Maybe there isn't a global conspiracy to secretly oppress you and make you miserable. Maybe you're actually being reductiv…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 11:45 PM
-5

Are you actually saying that the world is equally easy from the get-go for trans/gay and cis/straight people, all else being equal?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 11:33 PM
1

I'm a man, you persecution complex incel. I grew out of thinking everyone has it better than me, maybe you will too one day.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 03:37 PM
0

lol
/r/MensRights15/02/19 04:00 AM
0

Do you believe that "female cunts" have as large of a negative impact on society as toxic masculinity? Genuine question.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 02:25 AM
1

Okay, I've wasted way too much time on this. To quickly respond to your points: Sure, distrust of men is a learned prejudice. However, this prejudice doesn't actually harm anyone as much as toxic masculinity harms everyone. Also, the prejudices aren't going to go away if we don't root out the toxic behaviors listed previously, as we can see this is where the prejudices form. Women being in the labor force doesn't mean they have as many choices as men. The "gender pay gap" is a myth in the sense …
/r/MensRights14/02/19 09:03 PM
1

Eliminating catcalling does not benefit men Firstly, we're talking about men harassing women and treating them differently from men in general, not catcalling specifically. Secondly, doing what you claim to be effortless and eliminating these behaviors helps men too because then male strangers will be trusted more by women in general, and everyone can get along better. Women aren't distrustful of unknown men because they're randomly sexist or something, almost every adult woman has had negative …
/r/MensRights14/02/19 08:18 PM
2

The ad is called "The Best Men Can Be," and it depicts men calling out annoying, obnoxious behavior by men. I don't dispute that this is good, I dispute that this is anywhere near the "best men can be." You know what, I think we can agree on this. Gillette is a company with a slogan and a profit incentive; they made a good ad not because they care about social movements, but because they wanna keep people thinking about Gillette. This ad postulates that serving women's interests by calling out c…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:26 PM
3

Yep. I'm really glad I was able to see through a lot of this shit as I grew up. I'm still subbed to r/mensrights and r/tumblrinaction for perspective but I roll my eyes at posts like this.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:04 PM
2

Exactly. It's just confusing when a bunch of people act like it's targeting all men.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:03 PM
-3

Anti-male social media campaigns, like #killallmen and #menaretrash are incredibly popular, yet no women-led group is calling them out. I don't agree with the methods of these campaigns, but I guarantee you can't demonstrate any real-world harm that's come of them. Violence against men isn't rising, it hasn't become less safe to live in the world as a male because of a feminist social media trend. As a matter of fact, a feminist got booted from an event for Tweeting "Kill all men." There's no re…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:01 PM
0

It's an entire commercial dedicated to negative depictions of men. Yes. You see, the ad is about bad men, and bad things otherwise decent men do without realizing the harm. If the ad wasn't about that, there wouldn't be so many bad men in it; however, that's the entire point of the ad, so unsurprisingly that's what's in it. but this commercial targeted a massive swath of men, which looks like an attack on men. Well I'm glad you acknowledge that's what it can look like, rather than that being the…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 06:04 PM
-12

Okay, I used to be a big MRA and even trying to go back and look at the ad through that old mindset I can't figure out why people have a problem with it. It's literally saying "These actions are what toxic masculinity actually is, if you don't do these and call out people who do you're a real man and that's awesome." Women are calling out men who dislike this ad because it's impossible to figure out how good men can see it as attacking to them.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 05:08 PM
-1

Wow, you don't have any arguments and just want to play the victim. Yeah, the people defining policy, literally ruling the world, are irrelevant.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:48 PM
2

Yeah. I've come to realize over the years that this sub isn't great in terms of the views of the people here.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:39 PM
-3

Him making a comic about it doesn't prove shit. StoneToss is a nazi, and that's not hyperbole.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:44 AM
-5

How does one reply to such delusion? What did they say wrong? Everything about this checks out.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:31 AM
4

Who the fuck upvoted this garbage?
/r/MensRights05/01/19 01:21 PM
7

What's the point of this distinction?
/r/MensRights05/01/19 06:00 AM
6

Literally MGTOW.
/r/MGTOW09/09/18 03:49 AM
1

Cringy title.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 07:00 PM
1

No point in boiling a party down to the radicals. You completely missed my point.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 07:11 PM
-2

Sure, but 100% of neo-nazis are conservatives. No point in boiling a party down to the radicals. EDIT: Downvoting a fact? Need a safe space guys?
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:07 PM
10

Most liberals' views don't align with radfems.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:04 PM
49

It's called parenting. Thousands of decisions are made for your child. Ah, yes, because there are many permanent body part removals carried out routinely by parents.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 09:23 AM
1

This post's title is cancer too tbh
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:41 PM
1

and feminism's history is all women centric Because throughout human and US history women have been oppressed? Obviously that's the term's history, it doesn't mean anything now.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 04:24 AM
1

That's a common trait, not the same definition. Feminism: Equal rights for all. Egalitarianism: Equal rights for all. Notice how they mean the same fucking thing. Take a text parser if you don't believe me, those are character-for-character the same.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 02:52 AM
1

Oops. You'll find that two of these mean the same thing, and two of these mean different things, meaning you made up a stupid argument that didn't actually follow my logic.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/17 12:34 AM
2

feminists want to swing the pendulum the other way, take away mens rights so that they are superior It's just a fucking name my dude. A real feminist = an egalitarian. fem·i·nism ˈfeməˌnizəm noun the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 09:23 PM
-1

The dictionary definition? Why do MRAs pretend only radical feminists exist?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 05:44 PM
-13

That's what mods are for?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/17 10:50 PM
-10

Letting upvotes decide kills subs btw.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/17 10:41 PM
41

Honestly, I don't think 99% of people like him are trolling.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 06:50 AM
40

You're being too pedantic. 2. You looked up the definition of ruined because you're being so pedantic and we found that being made blind fits the bill.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 06:42 AM
69

Lol he's literally irreparably harmed, he's blind for life.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 06:39 AM
153

Life ruined =/= time to kill myself. Also way to shove redpill stuff into an unrelated discussion.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 06:35 AM
214

Blinded and disfigured for life?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 06:26 AM
2

If you are so desensitized what makes you think extra skin would change that? Couldnt your foreskin be just as desensitized? It's not that I'm desensitized, it's that I'm literally missing everything that makes a penis sensitive. There are specialized nerve endings in the ridgid band and frenulum, as well as the fact that the protection the foreskin provides to the glans allows it to be more sensitive. Uncut guys will attest to hardly being able to rub their uncovered glans it's so sensitive, wh…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 08:51 AM
3

Oh, and I suppose you were there when I was having sex? Like what the fuck, everything I said is personal experience + indisputable fact.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 06:22 AM
7

Because I'm incapable of experiencing hardly any sensation during sex (same for BJs), and the girl I had sex with, who produced a ton of natural lubricant, would frequently get dry over the course of a couple minutes due to the lack of a foreskin. Human penises literally don't work right without foreskin, they aren't supposed to be missing it.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 05:58 AM
5

Mine is "properly" circumcised friend, or as properly as you can remove a body part for no reason.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 05:40 AM
6

female genital mutilation is by far the bigger antagonist here and that should be dealt with with more vigour And it's illegal in the majority of the world, whereas MGM is legal basically everywhere.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 02:57 AM
3

It's an incredibly personal and important topic.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 02:56 AM
6

Because nobody is going to want their dick cut off at 18 This is a good thing.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 02:54 AM
3

?
/r/MensRights13/03/17 02:53 AM
7

Here's the actual size.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 02:51 AM
12

Our circumcised penises work fine. My circumcised penis doesn't work fine, don't speak for me.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 02:49 AM
2

Humans have more bodily autonomy rights than dogs.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 02:48 AM
8

Same.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 02:47 AM
10

It kinda ticks me off for people to say you should just let the kid decide when he gets old enough, because it's really not that simple. The whole point is that they won't get cut as an adult, because nobody should get cut. That's why it makes perfect sense to let them decide as an adult, because they'll choose to stay intact.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 02:44 AM
1

I can't finish or really experience much pleasure at all but #worthit because lasting longer.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 07:25 PM
0

We have no reason to believe it's total fiction. I'm saying there's no grey area where the boyfriend in this story is justified in his actions.
/r/PussyPass21/01/17 02:31 AM
2

Thank you.
/r/PussyPass21/01/17 02:30 AM
-9

Lol sure. Why would we automatically distrust her? If there was a post here of a guy saying "I beat my wife, but it was justified because she started it" you all would upvote it unquestioningly.
/r/PussyPass21/01/17 02:30 AM
-23

But since we're only given hers, our only real option is to judge it from her perspective, and in doing that we can conclude that she hit his chest not very hard, and in return he fucking pinned her down and punched her a ton, then chased her to her car. Not a huge amount of grey area.
/r/PussyPass21/01/17 01:01 AM
-24

The part where he fucking beat her up for slamming his phone on his chest not very hard, then she had to lock herself in her car? I dislike double standards as much as anyone, but you redpiller types prevalent on this sub are fucking blind.
/r/PussyPass21/01/17 12:35 AM
-27

Did... Did you read the story?
/r/PussyPass20/01/17 09:37 PM
2

/r/cringe
/r/MensRights08/01/17 12:56 AM
1

You don't hang up the phone either.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 01:59 AM
5

One term was popularized when women had starkly lesser rights?
/r/MensRights07/12/16 01:53 AM
1

Not Von Miller! :c
/r/MensRights16/11/16 09:05 PM
2

I don't see how this is sexist.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 04:04 AM
0

Do you need to be told about the history of China/Africa/All of the Middle East/just about everywhere?
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:11 AM
7

annoying This is the key word. Also, was that an attempt at non-straight-splaining?
/r/MensRights23/03/16 07:22 AM
11

Asexual people have to deal with the annoying perception they don't exist Oh no..?
/r/MensRights23/03/16 04:03 AM
-1

This isn't even remotely relevant to the sub's purpose, this just makes us look like a bunch of whiny basement-dwellers. How does this display female privilege? Some random kids screwing around that happen to be female and one gets pushed over.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 03:51 AM
–

The point is good, but this looks like a cancerous facebook meme.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 12:47 AM
9

I meant that it's obvious following the information from the first sentence. There's plenty of sources I've read but I don't have a definitive list. This should suffice though.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 10:50 PM
22

To add to what's been said, around 50% of external penile tissue is removed. You can claim "we'll never know for sure", but it's pretty obvious it's detrimental to sexual health and sex in general for both partners.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 10:27 PM
3

Everyone would have thought he was a showoff douchebag, if not a womanizer. This is literally the only example I've ever heard of society having a double standard in opinion that favors males, and it really isn't even true.
/r/PussyPass08/10/15 01:29 AM
9

Literally what are you talking about? Not even remotely true except in a few secluded circles.
/r/PussyPass07/10/15 10:47 PM
2

Wrong subreddit?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/15 08:03 PM
0

I've heard 300 dollars. 4 million babies are born annually in the US. 2 million boys. If around 66% are cut that's about 1.33 million. that's about 400 million dollars annually.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 08:15 AM
-1

Where did you hear this? I've never heard it described as cosmetic once.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 08:11 AM
5

What is your goal? To protect future generations from non-consensual permanent amputation?
/r/MensRights12/08/15 04:07 AM
7

chopping body parts off lie Uh, do you understand how the excision works?
/r/MensRights12/08/15 04:05 AM
11

How do you feel about female circumcision? In countries where FGM is prevalent, the women there use literally the exact same arguments as pro-circ American men. There is no denying that it's done without consent and that in itself is enough reason for outrage, not to mention all of the proof of damage.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 04:04 AM
8

It kills over 100 babies yearly, so in terms of health we're already operating at a negative, not to mention that cut guys wear condoms anyway so all you really get is permanent damage without consent.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 04:02 AM
2

Look up Foregen.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 03:59 AM
2

because male and female circumcisions are different One of these two is illegal in the US.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 10:23 PM
3

But I agree they should be given a choice. Then you're anti-circ in the same way we are. Of course you can cut up your bits as an adult, nobody's saying you can't.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 10:21 PM
3

This is because MGM is the 'solution' that sought problems. Any health benefits for MGM were made up after-the-fact as justifications.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:11 AM
4

half of uncircumcised males will require treatment for a medical condition associated with retention of the foreskin. Who would have thunk that amputating a body part means no further injuries or infections can happen to said body part? Tired of stubbing your toes? Hack that shit off! We treat vaginal infections and conditions as is needed, and everything works just fine. As a matter of fact, female infections are much more common and we still don't cut girls. The preemptive treatment by genital…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:49 AM
3

Firstly, those studies have been debunked and/or shown to be biased. Secondly, the supposed benefits are so marginal that amputation should never be considered a solution. Thirdly, parents have to right to permanently damage someone else because they think it to be in the child's best interests.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:03 AM
1

Not to mention the parents/insurance pays for the operation, so hospitals actually rake in millions annually.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 06:41 AM
2

Foreskin serves no purpose. Who told you this? It protects the sexual sensitivity of the glans as well as providing it's own sensitivity, considering it's full of nerves. 15 square inches worth.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 10:27 PM
2

Yeah, that attractive scar and dry crust.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:51 PM
5

It's like half a inch of skin calm down 15 square inches.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:50 PM
3

Huh. I've been circumcised as a kid because the skin was too tight and the head couldn't come out. This isn't a condition, it's a state. As a kid, it's supposed to be this way.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:47 PM
2

you should look into Foregen and HUFO.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:36 PM
3

Don't do it! You're really lucky to be intact, and you should keep it that way.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 11:01 PM
22

Damn, that was snarky.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:40 PM
3

Thanks.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:06 PM
2

Please post results if you convince him.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 03:45 AM
3

It sounds like he supports it for health benefits. Tell him that no non-American organization in the world supports it, the evidence is inconclusive, the health benefits are marginal if they're even true, and through either god or evolution humans are supposed to have foreskin. Also mention that it's illegal to circumcise females even though there are supposed similar health benefits.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 03:32 AM
2

You're being argued because it sounds like you're defending "his body, parents' choice."
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:21 PM
1

You wouldn't happen to be on the Foregen forums would you?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:13 PM
1

If you're for it, it seems perfectly fine too. It's not the parents' choice, and it removes 50% of sensitive penis skin.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:12 PM
3

I'm a follower of Foregen, and I'm not sure about this making a video thing. Two things they are doing are HuFo and a series of informational videos. HuFo is a huge step in circumcision damage awareness, and you can read more/help fund it on kickstarter, and the video series is being made by Foregen's spokesman, Eric Clopper.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 05:44 PM
1

Cleaner Looking Americans are raised to think this. The cut penis is scarred and unnaturally dry. Also hurts your partner during sex. Easier to wash About as easy as cutting your ears off would make washing. decreased risk of infections decreased risk of std prevention of penile problems decreased risk of cancer All super unlikely and not enough justification for mass mutilation. hurts less Just false. easier to "dry rub one out" Who told you this? Intact masturbation is unanimously agreed to be…
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:18 AM
1

I have a hunch that the odds of a feminist claiming to have been "raped" are a factor above the population average. Rape makes women feminists! See, rapists are really just trying to make everybody feminists. /s
/r/MensRights30/03/15 09:53 PM
2

frist of all, how dare yo u FTFY
/r/MensRights30/03/15 09:52 PM
9

We're still claiming women are systematically oppressed in the US?
/r/MensRights30/03/15 05:39 PM
1

There's hoping that modern medicine can undo all of the harm.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 01:23 AM
1

Yeah, that stuff happens a lot.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:13 AM
5

Emphasis on in America. It was started in other places by religion.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 02:29 AM
6

Circumcision has definite health benefits Doesn't prevent HIVs. 4 of 1000 men get UTIs after losing their most sensitive genital skin anyway. It's really easy to clean an uncut penis. What health benefits?
/r/MensRights10/03/15 07:52 PM
5

Sounds like you're refusing to see their side because you're annoyed at a select few people. Of course you don't mind being circumcised, it's normal to you. But the fact of the matter is that circumcision makes sex less pleasurable for the male and female, and in cases hurts the female during sex. As well as potential damage from the amputation. If being able to cum is your definition of "fully functional," fine, but it's an unnecessary practice that harms and doesn't help. Also, the only reason…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 07:50 PM
12

It's a terrible misinformed practice. It was started in America by puritans in an attempt to reduce pleasure. We only do it nowadays because it's "normal." If you decide you're unhappy that your body was violated permanently you might want to check out Foregen.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 07:43 PM
12

/r/intactivists
/r/MensRights10/03/15 07:40 PM
2

lol, using the stupid definition of sexism. Sexism is prejudice against a sex, changing the terms is stupid.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:56 PM
2

In theory, it should regrow exactly the same as it does naturally, so yes.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 06:03 PM
4

Do you mean foreskin restoration? It isn't anywhere near the same thing, as it's just slowly growing a faux-foreskin out of normal skin. None of the unique parts of the foreskin are recreated.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 02:05 AM
1

It's much more likely for someone circumcised as an adult to lose the ability to orgasm.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 01:17 AM
2

That's the hope.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 01:16 AM
3

So, between too much and almost no pleasure, you choose the latter?
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:38 AM
5

every day of my life I wish I had been cut Hundreds of thousands of men with every day that they could get their foreskin back. Most women who have been with both claim that uncut men are better, and you would lose most of your sexual pleasure if you were to get cut. If the only reason you'd be willing to give up most of your sexual pleasure is because of a few uneducated people, that's very sad.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:28 AM
4

First and foremost, there is no real justification for circumcision. It started as an ancient religious practice to lessen sexual pleasure so that men would be less tempted to sexually sin. Under the new testament, this is unnecessary and pointless. However, the practice has been widespread to the point where it's just what everyone does. The medical benefits are virtually non-existent and just an afterthought/justification for circumcision. The most sensitive/pleasurable nerve endings in the wh…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:02 AM
2

In their probable cause filing, authorities paint a picture of a mother overwhelmed and suffering from postpartum depression. Fucking die in a hole.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 12:00 AM
3

My initial comment was sarcastic.
/r/PussyPass08/10/14 08:02 AM
9

Holy shit, I didn't think people were thick enough for me to need a /s.
/r/PussyPass08/10/14 12:53 AM
15

Gasp How could they put that poor woman in jail for a double abortion? This country is sick and the patriarchy ruins everything! >:c /s
/r/PussyPass07/10/14 09:17 PM
98

statutorily raped I think the Judge needs to learn what that means. The whole point is that they aren't ready for the responsibilities.
/r/PussyPass07/10/14 03:24 AM
50

Just a little too optimistic.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 05:08 AM
44

How have we not changed this blatantly sexist definition yet?
/r/MensRights05/10/14 04:59 AM
79

What if they're both drunk? The man gets charged.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 04:07 AM
6

Really sassy. This is reddit. That's not to say that serious discussions can't be had here, but 99% of this is just feminist bullshit like /r/tumblrinaction and /r/pussypass.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:33 AM
8

Gettin' sassy.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:26 AM
1

You gotta love how after the false fact spewing, yelling, and insulting, feminists always end with pure denial. "No, that is not true." Props to you for putting up with her entitles BS.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:31 PM
2

Have you never done/experience this kind of shit when you were young? You'd be surprised. Never happened to me anywhere near this extent.
/r/PussyPass16/08/14 07:41 AM
3

black men restrain woman, pull up her shirt and touch her with stuff. SOUNDS SO ACCEPTABLE.
/r/PussyPass16/08/14 07:11 AM
23

This is pretty fucked up.
/r/PussyPass12/08/14 01:37 AM
1

“Prostitutes, or as I call them, prostituted women, are more victims than perpetrators inasmuch as they are in sex trafficking, they are the product, a human product,” said Singer. “Women in our criminal-justice system are pretty well underserved.” What the fuck? So they have no responsibility for their own actions?
/r/PussyPass09/08/14 04:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter