~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | "If feminists were what they tell everyone that they are, MRA's wouldn't exist."I'm guessing the women who tell you to take care of it yourself are not the women who don't like it when you do. It's a pretty heterogenous movement; in fact, I think the term "feminism" is so dilute as to be almost meaningless. You're always going to get a few obnoxious, self-righteous nuts in any movement. Feminists and MRAs both have their share. I've never actually come across that argument, except as a strawman used by antifeminsts. It sounds like the type of statement an idealistic college… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/08 05:16 PM |
| 1 | "If feminists were what they tell everyone that they are, MRA's wouldn't exist."At the same time, women have a better understanding of the issues women face. They might be best suited for identifying these issues and proposing solutions. The same is true of men and their own problems, or any other group. It makes sense for people with a common problem to come together and deal with that problem. I'd just like the groups to have the same end goal in mind, and to approach one another with respect and understanding. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/08 11:12 PM |
| 3 | "If feminists were what they tell everyone that they are, MRA's wouldn't exist."Plenty of feminists admit that they're predominantly interested in women's issues. They also believe that they're working toward equality. This makes sense because they believe that society is currently UNequal, with privilege skewed toward the men. It does Not mean that men's issues are imaginary or unimportant. It's just that, to many women, women's issues are both more apparent and more pressing. A response I've come across to men complaining that feminists aren't addressing situations where … | /r/MensRights | 23/08/08 10:28 PM |
| 1 | The loss of women and children is tragic. Men don't merit a mention.I agree. I said that we "might not be in imminent threat" to counter relevance the argument that "women and children first" no longer matters. We may in fact see a large die-off before too long, IMO. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/08 02:23 PM |
| 9 | The loss of women and children is tragic. Men don't merit a mention.I've always thought of it as natural selection, on a cultural scale. If a society loses a large chunk of its men, the remaining fellas will manage to take up the slack. Succeeding generations won't be too much smaller. If a chunk of women are killed off, the reproductive potential of that society is attenuated. Depending on how many die, it could be generations before the population rebuilds itself. The society would be vulnerable to extinction. Societies with the "women and children first" rule… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/08 12:11 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter