TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

numquamsolus Archive

View 0 posts and 93 comments by numquamsolus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That only works on helpless infants about to be aborted.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 10:14 AM
8

These work on iPhones and Android phones. Good luck.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 11:43 AM
7

Are you aware of the font that makes it easier for dyslexics to read more confidently? See this.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 10:41 AM
14

Local climatic conditions are not what you are looking for: it's whether and not weather.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 10:23 AM
1

I don't understand what you mean.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 06:18 AM
5

I think that you need to understand the issue from an evolutionary perspective. This does not in any way justify or validate societal notions of male disposability, but it does explain it. The objective of a species is to perpetuate itself. If there were not the case, then the species lacking the genetic compulsion for perpetuation would cease to exist. For humans, the scare resource for perpetuation of the species is a uterus. It's that simple. As long as there are enough men remaining to maint…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 09:10 PM
2

I was hoping that she'd keep the rôle so that she'd have more assets for the court to award to Depp.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 09:06 PM
1

I'm not sure about genetic superiority, but clearly males are more expendable in an evolutionary sense: Fifty cows, one bull
/r/MensRights04/04/20 11:45 PM
2

It is clearly a woman's issue because 20% of the victims are women and 80% of the perpetrators are women. /s
/r/MensRights31/03/20 03:17 AM
3

Let her be in future movies so that Depp can collection the financial judgment against her that he should receive.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 03:47 AM
2

I do not deny that there is a real issue underlying some claims of sexual harassment (or worse), but the definition of sexual harassment has been expanded to the point that a man saying, "That's a wonderful blouse that you're wearing" can be considered sexual harassment. The college campus figures for sexual harassment are outrageous--if they are to be believed.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:49 AM
1

I genuinely think that the basis of this is One bull, many cows. We men are simply not as valuable a reproductive resource whatever our personal merits may be. Society, itself an evolutionary result, values us accordingly.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 01:38 PM
3

That's not true. They were first used in English in the mid-18th century--700 years after the Norman Conquest.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 03:35 PM
6

A heterosexual man typically has a fiancée, and a heterosexual woman a fiancé.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 11:43 AM
1

Years ago, I would have agreed with you, but I now realize that we are living in a post-logic world. Premises and structured arguments are passé: only conclusions that satisfy preconceived notions are welcome.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 08:41 AM
3

Wow. So woke! Statements like his are apparently well-received by women but men don't really care, so the natural choice for a principle-less politician is to say nonsense like this.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:19 AM
4

Yup. Only Catholics priests are perverts. /s
/r/MensRights27/09/19 03:29 PM
1

And choice of majors: Women's Studies and Art History versus STEM majors.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 08:10 AM
2

The nonsense I have to hear about from young people today boggles my mind. It is as if they consider suffering to be something that is supposed to be completely alien to human existence whereas I, and the generations before me, were taught that it was an integral part of that existence. Sure, we were supposed to avoid it, but we accepted it when it came, and we worked around it.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 01:46 PM
3

But why is it that for untold centuries we men toiled on without recourse to suicide? Why is it that we are doing it now whereas before it was an unheard-of escape from responsibility?
/r/MensRights09/09/19 08:48 AM
1

Naturally! They could be identifying as respectable, mainstream types.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:58 AM
1

After reading too many horror stories, I've settled on telling women What a wonderful color palette! so that I can't be accused on being creepy. Now they just think that I'm effeminate.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 10:44 AM
29

That level of mis-reported paternity is a ridiculous assertion. The usual reported rates for mis-reported paternity is 2-12%. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-paternity_event
/r/MensRights20/05/19 01:46 AM
12

But men didn't accept that risk (i.e., the risk of carrying the child) when we decided to engage in sexual activity. (This assumes, of course, consensual relations.) There's no way around the asymmetrical risks associated with men and women engaging in sexual relations. The problem is that evolution doesn't give a damn about differential rights and assymetrical risks--it just clumsily moves along to perpetuate the species.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 01:39 AM
2

The fact that you and the vast majority of men haven't raped any woman is the reason that feminists are promoting nonsensical expressions such as microaggression.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 11:36 AM
2

No. Let's applaud the quality of the prize recipient's work and leave gender out of it.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 11:44 PM
5

I feel slightly triggered by your use of correct orthography, punctuation, and grammar: all tools of the Patriarchy. Today, I'm self-identifying as a member of the Patriarchy and so I am doing the same.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 01:09 AM
4

Pray tell what is that? I need more ammunition in my right-to-be-offended magazine.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 01:15 PM
32

You're setting the standard a bit high there. Nano-aggression is enough these days.
/r/MensRights16/03/19 01:41 AM
2

Actually, I disagree in a slightly nuanced way. There are a lot more stupid men than stupid women. Intelligence is more widely distributed statistically speaking for men than it is for women. Also, there are more extremely intelligent men than extremely intelligent women for the same reason.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 01:59 PM
1

But that's principally because they outlive men, is it not? So, it is fair that we randomly shorten the lives of women so that average longevity between the genders are equal? /s
/r/MensRights10/03/19 01:55 PM
7

Natural disasters of all types are becoming increasingly political correct, so... What the helll are these people thinking? More black and Hispanic firefighters who can pass the fitness tests? Sure. Fitness tests benchmarks changed so that the unfit can join the ranks of firefighters? No.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 02:55 AM
1

A random attractive woman is not the same as someone who has generally been selected as a date. The goal posts may have been moved, but they're still on the field.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 11:56 PM
1

What if she has herpes? You don't know her and you didn't vet her. That would be a problem... unless, of course, you've already got herpes.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 11:44 PM
2

I'm not sure. Let me consult a radical feminist to tell me what I should think.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:44 AM
13

Rational people no longer seem to have a voice in politics. She said this in Honduras during her husband's presidency and, for reasons that are all-to-easy-to-understand, mainstream media--except for Fox News perhaps--never made an issue of it. It is like Eric Holder justifying the drone strike on Anwar al-Awlaki, dismissing an entire amendment to our Constitution, saying that due process of law and judicial process are essentially what the government says that it is when it wants to say it and,…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 09:52 AM
124

But Hillary was so convincing when she told us that: "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." I hope that the /s/ tag isn't necessary.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 05:16 AM
1

Control is really nice especially when you can abuse it. I'm not sure whether an /s/ is warranted because what I've written is true.....
/r/MensRights14/01/19 07:52 AM
3

The correct quote is Where ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 11:39 PM
0

I'm male, but I tell people that I'm actually a lesbian trapped in a man's body.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 10:08 AM
3

Those toxic males should be ashamed of themselves.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 08:14 AM
1

There's no need to apologize. On the internet, it is difficult to tell the difference between ignorance and uncooperative spellcheckers.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 10:48 PM
1

The word that you want to use is indict and not indite, which means to compose.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 09:37 PM
2

Well, of course the babysitter was a female, because, you know, the Patriarchy! Moreover, who would trust their kids with a male babysitter because all men are rapist pedophiles right? Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 12:37 AM
1

This is called virtual rape: it didn't actually happen, but because, you know, the Patriarchy, it could have happened... /s/
/r/MensRights04/11/18 02:15 AM
1

Fifty cows and one bull.....
/r/MensRights26/10/18 05:39 AM
9

I understand the big lesson there was that sequencing matters.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 11:36 AM
20

I haven't heard a rational explanation for what was apparently a first-class shit storm. I learned pretty early on not to fuck with physics.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 10:17 AM
109

Mathematics is a tool of the Patriarchy. /s/
/r/MensRights17/09/18 08:14 AM
18

I've heard it said that I was afraid of a real woman because I prefer women to look healthy. Go figure.
/r/MensRights06/09/18 06:13 AM
1

I don't understand your logic. The whole point of her current position--which is inconsistent with just about every thing that we know about the incident--is that she was raped by him and therefore shouldn't be charged under California law. Now that she's upped the game, what could have been left to die its own death is going to be thoroughly investigated. I'm looking forward to seeing her try to explain her possession of child pornography and having sex with an underaged young man.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 10:42 PM
3

It's amazing that she'd say this when a bunch of old white guys and their Asian and African comrades-in-arms saved the majority of the population of the Korean Peninsula from the misery of the Kim Dynasty.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 11:05 AM
13

Why can't he just self-identify as a really safe driver?
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:34 PM
6

For as long as I recall, she's been a nasty, nasty person.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 12:38 PM
16

What a horrible thought: fucking Hillary Clinton.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 11:41 AM
2

"whether or not", "is theirs".
/r/MensRights18/07/18 01:09 PM
4

If I were your cat, and you were publicly fat-shaming me, I'd plot your death, too.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 01:21 PM
1

Your cat is plotting your death.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 09:40 AM
6

Men are more successful at committing suicide than women.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 04:14 AM
1

What does the second point even mean?
/r/MensRights15/05/18 01:28 AM
4

How do we deal with the serious situation of a false accuser not wanting to come forward to admit her (or conceivably his) lies because doing so will likely cause their own incarceration? The fact that the person made the false accusation in the first place doesn't speak well of their character....
/r/MensRights10/05/18 03:57 AM
1

On the other hand, isn't she wearing a cap made of the skin on an endangered species?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:12 PM
6

Literally Hitlerian rape....
/r/MensRights13/01/18 09:50 AM
1

I wonder whether she uses antiperspirant.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 09:49 AM
4

On that basis, a minority or either sex robbing a Caucasian male isn't really robbery because the Caucasian has all the power. What utter nonsense!
/r/MensRights09/12/17 09:49 PM
4

I was referring to a new feminist philosophical notion. I wasn't referring to the law. In any case, law is highly jurisdictional, so I'm not sure what law you were referring to unless it is the UCMJ. I hope you are clear on the relevance of the blog.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 09:08 AM
5

https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/2017/05/12/retroactive-withdrawal-of-consent/#respond
/r/MensRights04/12/17 08:54 AM
4

Feminists have apparently introduced a notion of retroactive withdrawal of consent. Seriously. Insane.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 08:46 AM
3

That exaggeration would, of course, undermine your entire assertion! Why do you hate women? Have you stopped beating your wife? Not married? Why do you hate women? Etc
/r/MensRights12/09/17 02:12 AM
2

It seems to me that it is implicit in the accusation of mansplaining.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:38 AM
2

How do we know the Dr Hirsch self-identifies as a man? (/s/)
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:20 PM
2

I'm less concerned about the gender issue than I am about her dismissing the underlying science.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:19 PM
3

You should self-identify as a female goatkin and then have her charged with lesbian bestiality.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 02:28 AM
2

Can I be micro triggered or do all triggering events cause full triggering?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 10:07 PM
8

Not good enough! "Clear, unambiguous, and continuous affirmation of consent" is such a better standard. /s/
/r/MensRights06/08/17 10:56 AM
2

"The corruption of language is the corruption of thought." It is common now to quote statistics about "sexual assault", and the meaning of that term can include a whistle or an unwanted request for a date. It seems to me that if people were genuinely serious about the issue, then they would be extremely careful about defining terms. Rape--genuine rape--and sexual molestation are horrific crimes, and yet it seems that the first step to dealing with it seriously, defining it, itself is not taken s…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 05:18 AM
1

Ah. Thanks. My "mild cognitive impairment" evidences itself once again....
/r/MensRights01/08/17 11:33 PM
0

Isn't she the one who admitted that she was diddling her younger sister when both were minors?
/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:40 PM
8

"John William Richard Durham Ashdown (1909–1980), was an Indian Army officer in the 14th Punjab Regiment and the Royal Indian Army Service Corps, and in 1944 attained the rank of temporary lieutenant colonel. During the retreat to Dunkirk in May 1940, John Ashdown ignored an order to abandon the men of the 32nd Animal Transport Company (Mule) under his command, instead leading them to the port and on to one of the last ships to leave, without losing a single man. Although court-martialled for di…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 12:29 PM
21

Her generation didn't know any better. We do.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:11 PM
-1

Bonobos are MUCH better than baboons because they will make themselves available sexually in exchange for grooming or resources! Imagine that!
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:12 PM
1

Not only that, but we men perpetuate the problem by dealing with problems rather than incessantly complaining about them.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:09 PM
14

You might be in luck, and there may be an infinite number of alternative universes.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:08 PM
1

Would you mind show us what the facing page says?
/r/MensRights19/03/17 08:05 AM
4

That's a wonderfully sensitive comment from someone who probably is a cis-gendered member of the Patriarchy. /s/
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:31 AM
1

Well, the means cannot justify themselves, so I think that it is pretty clear that the end must justify the means, subject to the means being themselves acceptable.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 11:49 PM
1

As an old Jesuit professor of mine used to ask, "If the ends don't justify the means, then what does?" Ouch.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:05 AM
91

Not if she's given a pussy pass....
/r/MensRights28/07/14 02:23 AM
19

Clearly, he should have removed his penis before defending himself.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:35 AM
16

It is extraordinary to me that simple notions of natural justice are lost on the administrators of what was (and perhaps still is) a great educational institution.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 08:11 AM
3

A gentleman doesn't confuse a woman with the facts.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 08:11 AM
1

I'm not saying that is the way that things should bring be in America; I'm suggesting that is simply the way, unfortunately, that they are. We have a serious problem in America with different treatment of races, and we should all be unhappy about it.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 08:29 AM
-5

Are you a dark-skinned American? Because if you are, thank your lucky stars that it ended as well as it did.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 03:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter