TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nxg Archive

View 0 posts and 96 comments by nxg on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The first one is especially interesting when the stereotype generally is that men think with their dicks while women are above that. It's the old tactic (common in not just feminism) where you enemy has far more power than you while at the same time too even push a fly. The same thing happens with maturity, women/girls mature earlier while it takes longer men/boys. But when it comes to sex an underage boy should know better than sleeping with an adult.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 03:29 PM
2

There's a lot of stuff left out here, especially the "just" bringing up transgenders people testosterone/estrogen levels up to the expected level. Testosterone is not given to men lightly (regardless of how people portray it) because we have, for the most part, a good idea of the negatives and positives. As for transgender people, as much as activists might not like it, it's important to remember that regardless of what gender you feel like you are doesn't change your sex. And this is very impor…
/r/MensRights20/01/23 01:05 PM
0

Going by his track record, he may complain about testosterone, even though it seems that being on testosterone helped him make better movies.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:47 AM
10

They made a series were a couple of man (and a woman I think) complain about how violence is absolutely 100% at fault for violence in the world ... followed by a scene were a woman massacres countless men with ease.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:44 AM
13

Yes this seems to me what's really going on, he used to be a dick (and honestly probably still is), but instead of owning up to it (which I'd argue would be the masculine way to handle it) he simply blames testosterone and toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:42 AM
-1

This will very likely explain what was happening here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WMuzhQXJoY And that will likely be true even if she does not think of herself as a feminist, a lot of people (including men) have feminist ideas about the world, nowadays probably more than people actually identifying as feminists.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 12:42 PM
33

Some additions from my own experience, though this is from ~25 years ago (and not in the US). To 1. As a boy being part of a bullying means you will get punished, in my case that was as the one receiving the bullying. To 2. I didn't really see any outright yelling towards guys, but 90% of my female teachers made sure be very public about the error individual boys made (for example during tests). Basically shaming them in front of the whole class. I didn't see that happen once with girls. My expe…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 11:37 AM
2

So "It's not about men but about mansplaining" when the original post literally started as "I like when men explain basic things to me". Nevermind that mansplain is used when a man explains anything regardless of competency level of anyone involved. Unless it's a man explaining to another man how supposedly easy a man has it in life. The annoying thing is that her original post doesn't seem to be about mansplaining at all, instead she seems to be about guys passionately talking about their passi…
/r/MensRights07/11/22 11:08 AM
6

Women can do anything a man can do, so they can definitely mansplain. Just look at your average feminist mansplain to what it is like to be man with total authority ... and the zero knowledge on the matter.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 10:58 AM
13

Pretty much. Any average man you will ask about stuff like this will state that women have it harder in heartbeat, never having even thought about it.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 02:22 PM
2

Create Post -> "Link" Tab -> URL of the Video in the URL field Reddit detects it as a Video and will embed it.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 10:01 AM
72

Honestly, even if it was just "kids saw a boob, OMG!", replace boob with dick and people would see the situation completely different. And this wasn't even a situation where they saw it by accident, it was purposeful flashing, something that would have been seen as harmful if it had been done by man.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 04:28 AM
14

I agree, in practice it sadly feels like circumstances will be held against men even women with the same or at least similar circumstances will usually have them counted towards their defense. We see something like this with teachers that by law should be charged with statutory rape, yet male teachers are punished more harshly compared to female teachers who do much worse.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 06:49 AM
1

It being widespread isn't really the point, my point is that we see it in all human cultures, even native tribes that had no outside contact before. The thing about being praised doesn't make sense, as we see it in all cultures even without contact to others. If it really is purely nurture then it has to have developed in every culture independently, which is possible but still indicates that there is likely something in common (outside of social heredity). I'm unaware of any place on earth that…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 10:44 PM
1

Every single culture of humans had male disposability, and every single culture had (and still has) males defending females, be it from outside threats or from other humans. I'm unaware of even one single case where that hasn't been the case, even from little we know from cavemen and neanderthals this has been the case. This suggests, that there has to be a link of it to nature, no matter how small it might be. That makes is incredibly hard if not impossible to prove that there is no link. Yes w…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 03:15 PM
1

I don't think there is a simp gene, but yes it would help my case, but it would only help, it wouldn't come close to proving that gynocentrism is based purely in nature, though my case isn't even that, all I'm saying is that there is plenty evidence that points to it being based in nature, which wouldn't even mean that it's purely based in nature. And yes I seriously want to know what leads you to believe that it is absolutely factual that gynocentrism is purely based in nurture. Yes studies in …
/r/MensRights08/05/21 02:09 PM
1

I have no issues with the definition, reality is that it's quite difficult to distinguish what behavior stems from nature and which from nurture, and to my knowledge we don't have all the answers yet (besides may be the identity politics group that knows for a fact that everything is nurture). I'm not saying that we're necessarily fully like any other species, but there is a good reason why animal testing has been to beneficial, and it's not just used for testing drugs, we have learned quite a b…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 01:47 PM
1

That would essentially mean that nothing in human society is natural. We see gynocentrism in nature, where adult males either take over as the leader or get kicked out of the tribe. That is usually how we determine something being natural. If it truly were fact than by that definition (or rather applying it like that) you might as well throw natural out of the window as a term. We see gynocentrism in all human cultures, modern society does certainly amplify it, but we certainly don't have enough…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 12:19 PM
2

I find it quite worrying that you equate something being natural with it being good. Plenty of very horrible and disgusting things are quite natural. It might in truth be natural to value a woman's life and comfort over a man's, just as it's natural to the same thing for children. And so what if it is? It's also natural to die of a cold, it's also natural to die of cancer. Something being natural is a very poor indicator of something good or right. Dying of cancer is natural and yet I would do e…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 11:21 AM
6

Yes slavery was normalized back then (and still is today if you step outside of the western world), but even that likely had many reasons stemming from human tendencies. I don't literally directly or indirectly justify gynocentrism. Just because something is normalized in society doesn't say anything about if it's a human tendency or biological at all, though one could actually make an argument that something being normalized could potentially suggest that it might be. There's far too much evide…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 10:21 AM
9

No, I agree with it being human tendency, that much at least seems to be the case from a lot of studies. However that we still still accept it as such in modern society is normalized misandry. We have many tendencies that seem to come from human nature, but in modern societies we've learned to oppose many of them anyway, and the tendency for gynocentricity is certainly one we have to conquer if we truly want equality.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 09:55 AM
1

Is it really that much different, though. A false rape accusation can easily cost me my job, potentially incarceration and even death isn't out of the question. My whole livelyhood is linked to my job, even more when the reason for me potentially being fired will make it harder for me to aquire a new one after, and on top of that I might have a family that relies on me. People tend to underestimate just how much of an impact a false accusation. For me as a guy going by statistics I'm a lot more …
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:46 PM
1

I think more brave isn't a bad way to put it, though the result doesn't necessarily have to be that women just walk out at night. You can know that you have an irrational fear of spiders and still have arachnophobia for example. We take a lot of risks in our lives, and the best way to deal with it is to know more about what kind of risk you are actually taking and the taking action based on that, knowing full well that you didn't do so with full certainty of the outcome. Not going out alone at n…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 03:07 AM
8

I started avoiding playgrounds/kids as I grew older because I noticed how are other men are perceived that tend to be near kids as well how i was perceived as I got older. It just takes one accusation to be labeled as pedophile as a man. There are plenty of reasons to fear being around women, even if it is really rational. In truth a child is probably more likely to run into female pedophiles as they rarely get recognized as such. Is that really how we want to move forward as a society, though? …
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:38 AM
28

Exactly. Another example would be the countless kids killed by their mothers' every yeah, should all women also be responsible for that?
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:23 AM
1

There a lot of easy counters. For example you would be allowed again as a man to decline hiring women, after all you can't tell beforehand if they will accuse anyone of rape. And i should be able refuse to working with women for the same reason, even if my employer ends up hiring them. Both of which would be silly, but in an odd way these examples are actually a lot more harmless when compared to what people are actually demanding.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 02:11 AM
1

No, that's the one he had when they got together. It eventually broke completely after his wife misused over and over. He then got another expensive model, only to realize that his wife still misused it and thus the machine as well was event broken beyond repair. He now wants to get a cheap one (or already got one) while his wife is complaining that they do have the money to afford a good one. Though seeing how she handled the previous ones they might have the money to buy one, but I don't think…
/r/MensRights09/03/21 02:22 PM
2

Pretty much, and it's also pretty well known that that also plays a role in what kind of programs law makers try to introduce, to ensure (re)selection. But I'm not convinced that it's just about those in power more likely to be men, there seems to be another element for it as well, though it might simply boil down to a lot of people actually believing in the idea of the patriarchy (in one way or another).
/r/MensRights02/11/20 11:42 PM
1

That's more or less my experience. Which is why I don't really understand why it's usually portrayed as men forcing it onto women.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 11:24 PM
11

That and there's a chance that reversing will not work. In general though it's poor comparison, unless they somehow want to blame men or society that pregnancy results in childbirth. Though I wonder how many on the pro-life side are man. There are countless women that advocate for pro-life, yet it's always portrayed as men trying to control women's body. Thinking about it, isn't abortion a control over the body rather than being pro-life?
/r/MensRights02/11/20 10:50 AM
1

Yeah, that's the issue. Yes, this should be seen as evidence for abuse, but in practice this is seen as pretty normal, you're more likely to find people just wondering what exactly the issue is with this piece of paper.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 09:28 AM
1

ADHD meds are both under- and overprescribed, sadly. Many kids that would need it have it denied because of misplaced shame among other things, on the other hand a lot kids (especially boys) have to take them to "fix" them. Girls on the other hand show different symptoms usually (as is the case with many other mental illnesses and disorders), because of that it is often times overlooked and often only recognized by people if they show the same symptoms as boys. ​ Regardless, the decision whether…
/r/MensRights12/09/18 12:25 PM
2

Exactly, the idea is to ban it to be done on babies/minors. If you want to it to be done to yourself as an adult, then go ahead, it's your body.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:27 AM
27

The funny thing is a lot girls/women actually seem to feel that way about their vaginas, that's why there have been campaigns to show girls that their distinctive looking vagina is natural and ok as it is. Of course we don't see the same for men.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:29 AM
23

I disagree with "no real skills required", the mental gymnastics needed for a job like this seem to be astounding.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 11:35 AM
2

If actually force someone to drink (or mix in alcohol in secret) then I would agree with you. But getting someone drunk is too broad a term, simply buying drinks for someone for example, shouldn't count, after all there is the choice to simply not drink. Of course if someone actually becomes unconscious in the process then that's a different thing all together.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 07:40 PM
2

The same doesn't apply to drunken driving, so neither should it here. Reality is different of course, as we know, but that doesn't mean that it should be.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 04:09 PM
10

I've seen women from oppressed countries making excelent points for whey they would never associate themselves with feminism.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 03:50 PM
12

To be fair, a lot of girls get told basically exactly that, by feminists and non-feminists alike. Even in media all they ever see is about how girls/women got as far as they did despite being women (they usually make a very big deal out of it).
/r/MensRights06/02/17 09:20 AM
2

Again with those unrealistic beauty standards for women.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 09:08 AM
1

Generally when I ask people to do something (politely or otherwise) then I don't expect them to do it, though that might just be a sign that I'm a pessimist. There is however a backlash, not necessarily due to people using it, but rather because people believe it (probably but not necessarily due to people using the word that way). People treat autists as if they were idiots and they refuse to accept that someone who isn't stupid could be autistic. I don't really care about political correctness…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 08:37 PM
2

Sure they do and I know that it won't change anytime soon, but I also have seen the backlash that people with disabilities face as a result. Back on topic, though, considering a polite request like that to be over sensisitive? The replies to him sound more like "Stop triggering me, Shtlord".
/r/MensRights15/08/16 01:46 PM
1

That's what I meant. That is what makes cases like these especially bad/complicated. It's somewhat like a (bad) prank played on you results in you being incarcerated for years.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 01:15 PM
2

There's also criticizing the usage of the word, because the word doesn't mean what you are using it for. Autism doesn't mean stupid, even if a lot of people do use it that way. It's the same as using feminism as synonym for equality.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 12:56 PM
1

Chances are that she doesn't fully understand what she was doing to him. Which makes the whole idea even scarier, because when raising children there will always be times when they won't see eye to eye with you. Even spoiled brats will likely often feel that their parents are "too strict". The possibility of being charged with rape because of that is a hard pill to swallow.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 10:27 AM
1

They still need to be treated as innocent until proven guilty, of course. No one is saying (or should be saying) that due process shouldn't apply.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 10:17 AM
2

True, but he isn't policing anything, he is asking nicely. Words like mansplaining and manspreading get critisized here frequently (and for good reason, I'd say) but asking politely if someone could consider using a different word is somehow over sensitive?
/r/MensRights15/08/16 10:06 AM
2

Exactly. The reaction to his request is way out of proportion. It seems the ones that are overly sensitive here are the ones complaining about his/her request.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 09:59 AM
1

There is a saying (or whatever) that right-handed people are left-brain dominant and the other way around. I think this was a myth, but honestly don't know enough about the subject. But a lot of people do have the impression that that is how you determine which side is dominant. So I could see it as an honest question.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 01:01 PM
1

I think that is pretty much where we are already. Though, I do agree. I think it is more of a consequence because of how things are already (and how they have been for quite a while). I don't think that change should (or rather can) start with the lawyers, as long as people will be treated unequally by the system, there will always be a need for lawyers accustomed to how the system works. This would be true even if things were judged equally by people.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 03:20 PM
3

I would say they are needed, not because they discriminate based on gender but rather because they specialize on the defense of a certain gender. I'm sure that women and men do face different obstacles in court and because of those differences a specialized lawyer simply is needed.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 12:22 PM
2

Except that in case of men it's wrong if you don't act like one, as well.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:29 PM
15

In my experience, men simply have to learn to be able to shrug it off. Being told to "man up" (among other things) is pretty common, as it has been in the past and it will stay that way in the foreseeable future. It's a very serious problem that people usually don't acknowledge and something that a lot of people even joke about.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 11:28 AM
2

Like I said I would consider him being controlling, as in I wouldn't know, but I would suspect it to be the case. Of course things are often not quite black and white, and they often are not exactly what they might appear to be at first. I have seen relationships were you get impression that the guy might be a control, but once you dig deeper you see that he isn't actually the one holding the reins. And I'm pretty sure that there are many cases where the opposite is true, as well. That being sai…
/r/MensRights25/06/16 11:57 PM
2

Possible, and I fully agree that it's impossible to make an accurate judgement with so little (and one sided) information. That part of his comment stands out to me, though, since I somehow expected the anger he expresses here to be directed towards his gf (as in the controlled person) rather than towards a third party. I'm no expert of any kind on topics like this, though.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 03:59 PM
5

Yeah, that confuses me, as well. If it weren't for that part I would definitely consider him controlling. But that part really stand out to me.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 01:53 PM
7

It's generally thought of as socially unacceptable, but in practice, like you say completely socially acceptable. The whole thing (especially the thought that it would be utopian) is an extension of the way that society thinks of women as nurturers and emotional perfect beings.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 05:17 PM
1

No idea why /u/Revoran commented on your grammar, but I could easily see how people could have a hard time understanding what you mean, especially for non-native speakers. For example I guess that you meant "frowned" with "frond", but a lot of non-native english speakers (andy maybe even a handful of native speakers) might have a hard time figuring that out.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:21 PM
3

Actually, they are implying that men would solve women's problems in ways that men do not even slightly bother to address men's problems.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 09:19 AM
6

It didn't seem like he really cared what she said, either. Especially the pendulum rebuttal was interesting to me. A pendulum were a good metaphor if the issue really just switched sides, but her whole point was that that is simply not the case as only one side of the equation changed. I didn't watch more than roughly half way through but his responses seemed to be something he wrote on a card before the show even started.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:40 AM
3

May be we should fight real issues, you know, like man so reading. /s This is a good cause and needed. Yes it is a family matter, but the pro-circumcision side is big and it can be incredibly hard to find support for it.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 12:17 PM
2

Reality would be much simpler, rarely any (if any at all) women would apply, which would make them unable to meet the quota. Unable to meet the quota it would be illegal for them to hire men, even if they needed more people.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 12:37 PM
2

Often enough it doesn't work out well for the children either.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 01:54 PM
5

Not sure about definite proof, but how he talks about "their family" is at the very least a red flag.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 10:10 PM
4

Pretty much, I have seen many people complain that men do not open up, those same people were the first to complain when men finally did open up.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 05:19 PM
2

That's exactly what I was getting at, sans the lying about a kid part. Then again the she doesn't directly say that about lying about a kid but rather about lying in general. Either way when it comes to life changing decisions, lying to or tricking people isn't the way to, but especially when it comes to pregnancy there seems to be nothing there to discourage women.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 07:37 PM
13

Do you really think it's that different in other (western) countries? It's not without reason that handsome guys sexualized that much in the media and women tend to voice their opinion about those guys quite openly, even in front of their spouses.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 12:43 PM
1

I totally agree with that, just wanted to add to it. Personally I'm more surprised that specifically pressure at work is mentioned since it could be any pressure, if pressure is the cause at all.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 12:38 PM
27

To be fair, people do lie under pressure and probably easier so, but that's in no way limited to women.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:46 AM
4

They would probably argue that it's sexist if the daughters are not called 'princess', as well
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:05 PM
3

I would say the actual abortion is not a MRA issue. Sure it seems unfair to man not having a say in it, but forcing pregnancy is still not the way to go. The issue here is the consequences for the man, which is determined by the woman alone.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:26 PM
3

I agree. I mean I understand the sentiment, when you get raped (or get sperm stolen any other non-consenting way) you wouldn't want her to be able to have that child. But simply to force the perpetrator to abort isn't the solution. What we really need here is protection for the victim to be free of consequences (child support and so on), that's what really should matter.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:19 PM
0

Experience tells us that that's not true. It will affect males as well, especially the victims of domestic violence. Not in a benficial way of course, we see how women misuse such laws (or simply the prejudices of law enforcement).
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:29 AM
1

And it's introduced into more and more countries, I think. Of course it doesn't outweigh the bad things the law brings with it.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:26 AM
12

I think this what many of us thought feminism would be like, before being confronted with reality.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 12:27 AM
2

They wouldn't let it count because it doesn't fit into their agenda. And they don't seem to care much about men having problems (well society as a whole) or will simply not acknowledge it.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 11:58 PM
5

Very true, they basically even say the opposite when they talk about man-hating, which they simply claim that they are not part of feminism, but when it comes to an issue that men face, then suddenly we all should suffer because Hitler was a man.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:12 AM
3

Another reason is simply that FGM is used as a reason of why MGM isn't bad, which doesn't make much sense. Even if MGM really were so different from FGM, it would still be like saying "Robbing someone isn't as bad as killing someone, so it's fine".
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:05 AM
1

I don't think so, the hostility seems to be according to the gender of the affected not the being hostile. It might as well be that the majority of the hostility comes from men. Edit: rechecking the image again, it seems that I simply overlooked that detail, it does specify women on men and the other way around.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:50 PM
7

To be fair, the authors of this poster wouldn't consider any male to be trusted.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:50 AM
0

Because a lot of people are so absorbed in the idea that women are oppressed, that the mere thought of men having issues is just too foreign to them, that leaves very few things that MRAs could be standing for. Of course the complaints of men about the so called friend zone comes to mind and the rest of men, that are not in the friend zone have to pick up artist (or what ever the best name for the male version of slut is). A lot of these people are men, which is no surprise, we get told all the …
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:00 PM
1

Well you look up to see people who have it better than you. That way you don't really notice the ones around and below you.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:09 AM
2

While I don't know what dingobait exactly meant, I think its a lot of the time like that. Even if your mother doesn't blame your father or manhood, you still get the impression of male disposability from everywhere today, and without a positive male figure in your life the impact is most likely even stronger.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:02 AM
1

While that's likely true for you in the US, I was under the impression that jail is not prison. Are jails owned privately as well?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 12:28 PM
0

Appealing to emotion by wrong advertising won't help anyone, it will most likely make things worse in the end.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:55 AM
1

I agree that we shouldn't use this guy as a way to talk about domestic violence, and I think that's not what this was meant to be about. The point how people react and talk about it, it is fucked no matter the circumstances, but if the gender were swapped, the reaction would be much different. What we want to change is that men receive help, or at the very least are warned about dv, but for that to happen the public perception needs to change.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 05:39 PM
2

I'm not sure about the US, but afaik here in Germany the law differentiates it. As far as supporting the traditionalist view of women, that's hard to say without knowing rulings in cases like this (and I don't expect a lot of men even trying to sue). My guess would be for it to be considered sexual harassment the woman would most likely need to scream "Look here, I'm sexually harassing this guy" for it to be considered as such. Ninja edit: as this is me just guessing, I'd love to be provedn wron…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:08 PM
2

I agree that the lines are getting blurred, and that basically only when comes to cases with men as perpetrators and women as victim. None the less, there is a line between harassment due to sexism, sexual harassment and sexual assault. Sure a lot of feminists (if not almost all) are fighting blur the lines even more, but I'd say that that makes it even more important for us to differntiate these. It helps no one if blur the lines the same way they do.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:30 PM
1

I would ask why feminists? Sure they will defend her, but so will a lot of other people, both women and men. It really is a a sad thing how deep these kind of stereotypes are in our society (and most likely not only in our western socities). Feminists have fought long and hard to battle the pains that women have with these stereotypes, and it's doubtful that they will even acknowledge that men suffer from them. I'd say that is a prime example of how much damage this one sided approach on things …
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:00 PM
3

Knowing nothing about the US laws on the matter, I would still say that there is a difference between sex-based harassment and sexual harassment, even if the latter is sex-based harassment, too. On a side note, sex-based harassment might give people the wrong impression on what it is, harassment out of sexism would desacribe it better. That being said, though, keep in mind that english is only my second language, so "sex-based harassment" might mean something different to me than it does to a na…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:12 AM
1

Now that you mention it, I vaguely remember talks about them requesting church status, but I'm much out of the loop on such things.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 08:29 AM
1

Like I said, your tax goes to the church you're in, as roman catholic it goes to the roman catholic church, as protestant it goes to the protestant church. If you don't belong to a religion/church you don't have the tax. Though I know there has been talk about getting a tax for people whithout a religion to pay for some social things, but as far as I know that is not the case for now (heard about it 10 years ago and inbetween). Baseline is, if you're atheist, but belong to one of the churches, y…
/r/MensRights27/06/12 08:26 AM
1

It is "official", but that has a financial background, unlike the US our Churches are paid for with Taxes, they are not commercial organisations, and you pay taxes for the church you are in, not sure if the same goes for Muslims/Jews. Scientology and Jehova's witnesses are as far as I know commercial organisations, and are not accepted as official religions (unlike the catholic churches, Jews and Muslims). I waas sure it was even stated on the ID, but I just checked and it isn't, it is stated th…
/r/MensRights26/06/12 12:07 PM
0

That and a lot of people of turkish descent living here, most of which are now German, but most do not try to integrate into society, do not try to learn German and so on. It's will most certainly stay a hot topic.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 09:12 AM
3

True, you have the right to decide the "religion" of your kids here (Germany), which is basically simply how you raise them, as soon as the kid is 14 years old he can switch/choose his or her own religion (it's a law here, but of course most kids are pressured not to switch, especially those with an islamic background). Circumcision is something that goes beyond that and not reversable. But it's simple, if someone truly believes judaism or muslim is the right religion for him, he can still do th…
/r/MensRights26/06/12 09:07 AM
2

I don't think that's the intention of the statement in the book, even if you can read it the opposite way. But either way, this is an Elementary school book, and I don't think I would have understood it the way you say it at that age.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 09:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter