TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

nycjohndoe Archive

View 1 post and 80 comments by nycjohndoe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

it is ok to find people hot / sexy/ fuckable. it isnt wrong to find people attractive or sell objects based on sex.nothing wrong with being an assman, titman, or dickman. quit thinking that being turned on by someone is guilty.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 01:31 PM
4

x per cent of women married husbands with significantly higher levels of education than their own. x per cent of men married wives with significantly lower levels of education than their own. so more men were marrying below their education level now than in the past. saying it this way..what does it say about men in Europe? was/is there a shortage of comparably educated women in Europe? are well educated women not interested in marrying their comparably educated men? was the world different when…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:52 PM
1

best line "is that the key to your heart"
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:02 PM
2

i suppose i read it differently. yes she is determined to 'free' herself from the kids with her single and/or childless friends when she can. If her kid is in a playpen they must be demanding on her time. i also remember that time as stressful and overwhelming. it was only a few years ago, but i can still remember my spouse feeling trapped and burdened as well. i can forgive ppl their little excesses if indeed that is what it was. if she is endangering her kids then the father needs to step up a…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:25 PM
3

She has children, but no desire to be a mature and responsible adult. are you are referring to her desire to "take a vacation" from being a parent? is the idea that the lowest standard of a good parent is one who never takes a vacation from their kids? i love my kid, my friends love their kids and we all love to take vacations from them for a few hours every so often. we all do it in different ways: online; at the pub; at home with a few brews; at the spa; etc. I don't think that means we hate t…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:51 PM
1

people allover the world continue to get shit-faced well into their 80s so yes its been living for a long time
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:29 PM
1

Is it bad for her and her kids that when she drinks she binges? sure. however, after reading the article, good for her to cut loose every once and again. just because you have kids does not mean you stop living. no man should be called a loser for drinking and watching MMA, no lady should be one for drinking with friends. caveats abound for the safety of the kids, but if you are a parent you know that if they are in their crib there is little risk to them if you fall into their playpen.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:37 PM
-1

Finally, it seems to Bill that her resolve is weakening, and he convinces her to marry him. Amanda would never had done it but for Bill’s incessant advances.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:51 PM
5

COTWA said...To our readers: this decision is ground zero for why we >have this blog. We don't know what happened between the two >parties the night he allededly assaulted her, but the erroneously >excluded evidence likely would be enough to create a reasonable >doubt about his guilt. I can get behind this
/r/MensRights07/08/12 04:58 PM
2

OP's questionable image aside: why are the three stooges funny, if not for the physical humor of slapping each other around?
/r/MensRights30/07/12 03:45 PM
37

So how many "outliers" in a row does it take to change the actual statistic? do you really think she wants to go for the another possibility: they don't want her
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:14 PM
4

its so fucked when the happy music pops up while she's screaming "lick it-lick it I'll break your finger"
/r/MensRights06/07/12 07:08 PM
2

did you read the article? if he had tried to rape that man it would be different. the judge considered that the criminal had assaulted what he though was a woman with the intent to rape, but since the victim was not a woman the judge threw out the attempted rape charge since to his reasoning there was no intent to rape a man. agree or disagree with that, his reasoning is completely different than "it is not possible to rape men".
/r/MensRights06/07/12 03:12 PM
0

this article is shit. if the woman were mentally incompetent then she could not give consent regardless of her age. you can't get over on a mentally handicapped person and get any good will from me.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 05:16 PM
10

elevators have cameras. you're probably ok in there
/r/MensRights14/06/12 03:13 PM
3

i don't think anyone could suggest that prince had any issue with his height which he overcame through use of platforms though. his clothes were a part of his hyper-sexual persona. I think it is apparent that Sarkozy WAS trying to be taller in a way that was not relevant to Prince. *edit its to it is
/r/MensRights08/06/12 06:23 PM
4

he did not help himself with his platform shoes or standing on his toes for official photos. Had he not made an issue of his height I think he would've disarmed most critics.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:57 PM
7

leon "no women, no kids"
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:54 PM
1

if you'd pick up a history book you'd see again and again that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. history shows that of the men who framed the federal constitution and those in the the state houses which later ratified it, have multiple 'understandings of the nature of people'. the framers and founding peoples of the US were not some monolithic block. They were composed of various groups primarily concerned with maintaining their own local power through throwing off the yoke …
/r/MensRights01/06/12 08:18 PM
2

strawman? Your statement was as follows There is a way to take care of those who are struggling in our society without giving an incentive to women to get pregnant for financial gain. you mention financial gain. I do have a problem with that and my point referring to that is valid. child support can be and is exploited by some women for financial gain at the expense of wealthy fathers, and it is enforced by the state. That whole system is broken, bottom to top, even when it "works." In restating…
/r/MensRights01/06/12 06:31 PM
2

I'd disagree on your premises a) greatness requiring free people to make moral choices and b)that the system will never work because the system is corrupt at its core. there are tyrannies of the minority and majority. pure democracies become one type. it is not the system that is inherently fallible but each component of the system, its people. even given that all systems decay into entropy, the human condition allows for improvements to be made and in effect renewing as opposed to maintaining. …
/r/MensRights01/06/12 06:12 PM
1

are you really willing to say that government social services make having a kid a positive net present value (vs. not having a kid)? if so I'd love to see you prove it. if you are stating that current divorce law penalizes men, then I agree.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 06:05 PM
12

While I understand your sentiment that since "gov benefits exists I'll get knocked up and someone else will support us" is morally wrong, social support institutions (gov benefits) exist for a good reason. The implementation needs work to be less sexist, but maximizing the available resources requires planning and is the duty of the person to themselves and their kid, if they find themselves in that situation, male or female.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 01:50 PM
2

Women work less. Therefore women don't do an equal amount of work this does not follow. saying women work less hours at their job in aggregate across the entire employed labor pool is not the same as women do less work. simplifying the point down to fewer words in this case is lazy and needlessly combative. firstly because saying that one 'works' only if one is paid by an employer for it is a poor definition of work, secondly because defining work as a function of 'hours spent at the jobsite' is…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:34 PM
2

They work fewer hours at far less dangerous jobs. That is pretty simple to understand. your quote does not address 'women don't do an equal amount of work'. i.e. being a teacher requires less work than being an lumberjack? just because one is more likely to end up dead does not reasonably affect the analysis of which does more work. or even suggest that they are comparable in a meaningful way.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 09:16 PM
1

repost this to all.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:33 PM
1

I suppose I'll take the other good, helpful, encouraging advice in this thread. Fuck off. shame you can't admit it was a poorly chosen example. lashing out at people isn't the answer
/r/MensRights22/05/12 10:05 PM
1

We don't have world records for every race or age group we still have a race to determine who is faster though. for the race to have meaning the competitors must be comparable. the race has value if it is a challenging one. Only with male and female athletes do some insist the winners are as good as each other do you have evidence of this? Now in some sports men don't have advantage, so it might be accurate to say the female winner is just as good as the male winner, which leads to the question:…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 10:01 PM
0

pretty bad example.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 09:43 PM
1

Powerlifting isn't just judged on the weight lifted. yes it is. from the wiki: Each competitor is allowed three to four attempts on each lift depending on their standing and the organization they are lifting in (usually smallest w-class to heaviest). The lifter’s best valid attempt on each lift counts toward his competition total. If two or more lifters achieve the same total, the lighter lifter ranks above the heavier lifter. In a footrace whoever runs fastest is the best regardless of those me…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 09:18 PM
1

Well, not really professionally nor at the Olympian level. OK we accept that grouping by age is relevant, but has yet to be seen as relevant at the Olympic level. We don't have weight classes in other sports where weight matters, exactly- we have weight classes where power matters i.e power lifting. it is never about safety when discussing weight in sports. we don't have 50kg weightlifters trying to lift the same weight as the 100kg weightlifters-they're much more likely to get injured. this rea…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 07:57 PM
1

Among adults, we don't really separate by age 1-why limit to among adults? Are you accepting that among kids it is appropriate to group by age? 2- there are many over 30, over 40 leagues specifically for people who want to have fair competition. Weight is separated based more on safety, how is that assumption valid? weight class is used the world over as a proxy for relative physical power. skill rank are separated with a clear tier system that doesn't imply the winners of each are all of equal …
/r/MensRights22/05/12 05:55 PM
1

So we are supposed to be sensitive, heartfelt people yet not show our emotions? stubbing your toe an wincing to pain is not showing emotion. if you broke down afterwards because 'it feels like the world is out to get you" and revealing your emotional pain & insecurities, would probably qualify.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 02:28 PM
1

My point was that despite other factors contributing, we only call unfair when there's a gender difference, and even then only when the men have an advantage. This line of reasoning is false. There are numerous where even after separating athletes by gender there remain sufficient unfair advantages between athletes to further group them age, weight, or skill rank (belt) to achieve fair competitions. Equitable measured by what metric? You seem to focused on outcome, whereas I think it should be m…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 01:16 PM
1

Only when there's a gender difference do we suddenly throw out the rules on fairness and make new ones. TracyMorganFreeman No one is denying what the greatest common factor is. The point is that gender isn't the only determinant in performance. You yourself admitted that using the available data the greatest single factor contributing to the measurable difference in performance is gender for some sports at the elite level. Did we make new leagues when Wilt Chamberlain dominated? We are not creat…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:21 PM
1

No, ignoring the scientifically measured differences between different types of athletes will result in the unfair and arbitrary outcome that less skilled athletes will be ranked higher than more skilled athletes. being born female is not a "talent, strategy or skill" and the resulting benefits therefore must be addressed in order to have 'fair competition' between athletes. Sports which incorporate both "technique and physical attributes" should be looked at carefully to determine if they would…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 06:35 PM
1

in your opinion is ranking someone higher who exhibits a lower level of skill while possessing greater physical attributes fair?
/r/MensRights21/05/12 04:53 PM
1

this will be unfair to those individuals who possess greater skill but have with less power per pound for any given weight class, would it not?
/r/MensRights21/05/12 01:09 PM
1

so not power lifting then?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 06:55 PM
1

do power and weight fall outside the "talent, strategy, and skill" categories?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 06:15 PM
1

Please tell me your definition of fair and unfair advantage with regard to sports.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 05:48 PM
1

my premise is supported by observable data. at the elite pro sport level the inherent and natural sexual dimorphism in humans is exaggerated resulting in different peak physical performance potentials between the genders.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 11:07 PM
1

No, you're making the false assumption that the best way to make a return is to hire the most skilled athletes. My point was "employing the best team to make a return is logical". Let’s see if it is true when we examine the Redskins example you bring up later on. Well, if Jane Smith would have ended a better tennis player in the mixed leagues than Navratilova and Williams, then perhaps we shouldn't be saying that Navratilova and Williams are the best female tennis players in the world. Perhaps w…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 11:04 PM
1

No one is denying what the greatest common factor is.The point is that gender isn't the only determinant in performance. We are expressly discussing if sports where gender differences matter should be segregated by sex. If they are the greatest factor in producing performance differences, then yes they should be segregated by sex. If there are other traits like weight class, or age classes which make competition even more fair, then great.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:26 PM
1

I'm recognizing differences in performance from the data. a simple regression analysis says the greatest common factor for that difference is gender in some sports. group by gender and the performance gap between individuals become much less. ie more fair.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:57 PM
1

separating by gender eliminates the source of the greatest performance variation on performance for some elite athletes for some sports. further groupings may be appropriate per sport. the fact that men tend to be taller is an advantage but it is by itself unfair? No probably not given we've talked about short NBA players. but again for any given height basketball players at the elite level men outperform women NOT because of differences in skill, but differences in morphology. There is no getti…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:54 PM
1

gender performance differences amount to unfair advantage in some sports.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:42 PM
1

Do you mean that it's syntactically or grammatically incorrect, or do you mean that you understood it, but disagreed with it? I meant my comment was employing the best team to make a return is logical." does not lead to me assuming anything and your comment did not make sense. You're unfairly using the "Equivocation fallacy" here. to clarify the context of the reply "best" was always in reference to gender performance. However #2 your original argument is also false. Navratilova and Williams wou…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:32 PM
1

I don't think I argued that we should pick other groupings like height for the basis of leagues. Sorry- I confused you with another person. No, you're making the false assumption that the best way to make a return is to hire the most skilled athletes. this doesn't even make sense. Navratilova and Williams aren't the world's best at tennis. They're merely the world's best... women. They were the worlds best female professional tennis players. No one say they were the best player overall. They wer…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 04:12 PM
1

So you're saying grouping for all the attributes that gender affords an advantage in will never mitigate all the advantages which gender provides? Let's just think about that a second? for any given sport you'd like different leagues divided by height, weight, speed over a given distance, power per pound, and endurance. I agree and we do it already for some sports by using gender as the first common grouping. edit for spelling
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:08 PM
1

this is false. the argument is to 'unfair' advantage. that there are genetic differences does not lead to making them unfair.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:03 PM
1

I'm sorry, I don't understand this paragraph. This paragraph is in response to your arguing that we should pick other groupings like height for the basis of leagues to eliminate any gender inequality. The existence of people like spud webb (short pro sport athletes) is evidence that selecting on height will not eliminate the performance gap between genders for certain sports. Why can't we have a single league for all genders ... (In other words, there are multiple parties involved here, and they…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:00 PM
1

what are you talking about negating the trend, when you provide no data. over representation of some genetic heritage in some sport is not the same as proof of genetic advantage. and as I've shown even when there is some evidence of measurable genetic advantage derived from genetic heritage those benefits have less impact on an athletes performance than their gender.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:57 PM
1

The variability of men is much greater than women, afterall. if that were true of the top athletes the data would bear it out and it does not ar·bi·trar·y/ˈärbiˌtrerē/ Adjective: Based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system recognizing the difference in performance in some sports between genders, analyzing the root cause of that difference and grouping players accordingly is neither Random nor based on personal whim. grasping at symptomatic expressions of the real re…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:53 PM
1

this is type of argument is easily dismissedwith a simple example from MLB. Would you say that dominicans have some genetic advantage since they are over represented in baseball? of course not since what you are seeing there (and in other professional sports) is the result of differential incentives for dominican youth and not absolute differences in performance potential. *edit a word
/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:26 PM
1

How did you arrive at the conclusion that it was sufficient? because i look at the data. the gap between top man and top woman is greater than the gap between top man x heritage and top man other heritage for some sports. it may be true that someone should look at the data for 100m times to see if the advantages black people have is due to some simple genetic trait. however from what i understand of it bolt is a speed freak due to his height and stride, not necessarily his blackness. are there n…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:13 PM
1

The stereotype of white men not being able to jump or blacks having trouble swimming is a stereotype for a reason: it's widely prevalent. it may be a prevalent stereotype, yet at the highest levels of professional sports (baseball, basketball, tennis, futbol, rugby) there are plenty of genetic heritages present evidencing that even with the specific genetic advantages one genetic heritage may have over the others, in sports, there still is enough parity between those heritages NOT to group them …
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:46 PM
1

The argument you're making is that there are large "unfair" differences between two groups due to genetics. No, I'm stating the observable fact that there is measurable performance differences between gender performance at the elite level of some sports and that that difference is sufficient to merit different competitions for those genders. And if there is the same level of disparity between the various genetic heritages in performance at the elite level for any particular sport then it is logi…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:09 PM
1

Yes. Just like the physiologies of blacks and whites. this type of generalization is a mistake. physioligical differences are only relevant if in aggregate the genetic differences result in performance differences so great as to merit distinct classes of competition. if that is the case then it should be addressed. Nothing of value of society? I think not diluting the idea of sport with the notion that inferior athletes are "just as good or better" when you divide them arbitrarily. Gender perfor…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:57 PM
-1

meh fair play if we can still trade up to the trophy wife in 'no fault'
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:28 PM
1

The fact that people like spud webb exist in the NBA simply means that there shouldn't be a pro short league. It provides no basis to extrapolate into a single gender league as it provides no evidence that women at that height + build play that way. It provides some insight the other way however in that ther are more women spudd's height than shaq's and yet those pro women players themselves do no seek the higher salaries of male NBA teams. http://espn.go.com/espnw/news-opinion/6527710/women-pro…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:27 PM
1

For all the reasons you list to look at individuals as special I would agree all individuals are special in at least their genetic make-up+personal experience. So what? How does that matter to pro sports? it doesn't. the one armed man who tries out for the olympic swimming team may be an example of determination and in all likelihood would be better suited to trying out for the para-olympics. Regardless that has no bearing on recognizing the value of gendered pro sports for some sports. also as …
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:15 PM
1

We all compete with the tools and circumstances we have right? Some are better off in one area as opposed to others. That has nothing to do with recognizing there are real differences in performance between the genders in some sports and it achieves nothing of value to society to eliminate gendered competition in those sports. Is there any value or merit or entertainment in racing a current generation Nascar vehicle with pro driver against a current model year production ford mustang for 500 mil…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:57 PM
1

The eye color thing is statistically verifiable and thankfully some one did a study http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/blue-eyed-players-hit-just-fine-in-day-light/ If you think that that woman should not be celebrated as an example of what dedicated and exceptional humans are capable of that is unfortunate because so few examples exist.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:47 PM
1

We do recognize and celebrate the pinnacle of gendered excellence in each discipline AND I think we do hold up exceptional individuals of 'unexpected' genetic heritage (david lee and michael chang come to mind). I would argue that we are not eliminating certain heritages from sports since at the olympic games (see also NBA,NFL, Futbol, Rugby) we see all genetic heritages competing at the highest level. I also think in trying to put too fine a point on the opposite end of this fact it is easy to …
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:42 PM
2

Here you have mixed two characteristics: eye color and ethnicity. eye color does not affect athletic performance. An argument can be made that there are sets of genetic traits which run together in different 'ethnic groups' that can affect specific athletic performance. However the degree of advantage those genetic traits provide is currently not seen as insurmountable or 'unfair' by most people for most sports. the only example I can think of is long distance runners and Kenya. And even there t…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:26 AM
7

No there are some sports where it makes sense to recognize the differences between male and female performance and to celebrate the best the world has to offer of each. Would Navratilova/Williams been recognized as such a dominant players if 50% of their matches were against the top men of their eras? Would women compete against Tyson/ Mayweather?
/r/MensRights15/05/12 09:35 PM
2

No there are some sports where it makes sense to recognize the differences between male and female performance and to celebrate the best the world has to offer of each. Would Navratilova/Williams been recognized as such a dominant players if 50% of their matches were against the top men of their eras? Would women compete against Tyson/ Mayweather?
/r/MensRights15/05/12 09:34 PM
7

there is only so much stepping up you can do to overcome height / weight / strength differences at the elite level. How fair would it be if there never were another female Wimbledon singles winner?
/r/MensRights15/05/12 08:37 PM
3

they probably got the idea from an old episode of the big bang theory
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:44 PM
1

unfortunately for him, he already conceived a child with that woman, the child simply has/had yet to be born.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:01 PM
1

you are first going to have to redefine rape. at least google's source for it since they say "committed by men". anyone who buys into the current definition will never understand your point
/r/MensRights11/04/12 01:23 PM
1

some people spend more time getting dressed than vetting the person they marry
/r/MensRights05/04/12 05:38 PM
15

depends on which white guy is speaking and to whom. there are white rappers who say nigga and there is that fat chick comedian loves herself the blacks.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:22 PM
4

Shepherd told a mental health evaluator that there were a total of about seven male students — 15 to 17. however morally wrong it was due to position of power/undue influence it was not pedo.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 07:17 PM
1

it is great that you have a good and working marriage. but honestly the opportunity cost for her not working and having a second fully realized breadwinner in the house may come back to bite you both in the asses later.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:36 PM
2

the whole precinct should be questioned to see who else subjected those girls to "viewing" cruelty
/r/MensRights06/08/10 06:16 PM
11

Breaking News: Men biologically different than Women. Pics at Eleven
/r/MensRights23/06/10 04:06 PM
-2

My nephew (15) is currently servicing Ms. Robinson. I gave him his due props and then I advised him to end it before it blows up in his face. They are using each other and he gets that. BUT so long as he keeps his head in the game and she keeps her head in the game no problem. Also people have been having sex as teenagers forever. Nothing new there and as long as both parties consent, have at it. If she gets knocked up - bad news (is that worse than him knocking up another 15yo?); if the get cau…
/r/MensRights09/12/09 05:55 PM
3

I love my son, who looks absolutely nothing like me. It would take a lot for me to test the genetics. Even then, as long as we are married, so what he's not my kid. If we get divorced, he shouldn't suffer additional hardships, so I'll deal with alimony ... BUT if she gets remarried, the new dude should pay for the instant family he's buying. Not saying I wouldn't help, but bitch made her choice.
/r/MensRights19/11/09 06:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter