TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

oafsalot Archive

View 1 posts and 1,124 comments by oafsalot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Questionsoafsalot/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:41 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,124 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Sometimes I think these things are so utterly unbelievable they just have to be bait. Don't engage with stupid, it'll pull you down to it's level and beat you with experience.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 04:24 PM
36

It's not the term I hate but the endless creeping of it's meaning. It basically now means, "anyone who doesn't share my world view who is male."
/r/MensRights08/02/23 01:23 PM
115

Vigilantism is a crime... You're a victim. Dating people isn't a crime, they're not victims.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 09:17 PM
3

This is getting more and more stupid as time goes on, without Justice, we're left with very few options.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 02:05 PM
5

Equal pay for equal work, but if your matches don't earn your team the same money then you didn't do the same work period. If you don't fill the stadiums every time, if the team don't get the same for advertisement, if your image isn't in demand for marketing material, etc. You won't get paid the same.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:49 PM
94

It was two separate events, the self-defence from the pellet gun ended when he retreated/fed, and then she just attacked him with no lawful justification, which should amount to more than one charge.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 04:16 PM
-1

Ha, this is just good advice for everyone. We have had some seriously concerning incidents with police documented in the last few years. Turns out, they're statistically much more likely to be vile awful people who do things like rape, murder and paedophilia than the average person.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 12:38 AM
11

Only severe and irreparable consequences keep people in check, and we've done away with an eye for an eye.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 09:36 PM
18

Using the courts against the CPS and Police is nigh on impossible. The sort of money you'd need is well above his means. And retaliation is a real risk too.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 11:49 AM
29

Can't sue courts, or Police for doing their job. He may have a very complex about being remanded when he had an air tight alibi, but with the Police and Courts maligned against that I doubt he'd have the weight to get it through, or the money. She apparently made a lot of money off her lies, so maybe he can sue for that, or have it ordered frozen so she can't use it for her commissary. It's unlikely she will get a harsh sentence, women's prisons are holiday camps, but she is likely to get a stay…
/r/MensRights11/01/23 11:48 AM
1

If I don't offer my sperm for the purposes of pregnancy then I should get a say, because IT DOES impact my life and affect my wellbeing and health.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 03:01 PM
-1

Hey, no. I've had bans for comments like this, it gets the whole sub in trouble. And you just know they're looking for an excuse to shut it down. Plus it's really not that helpful for the movement on any level to have anyone do that sort of thing.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 10:01 PM
3

I'll put money on your father not saying it like that. He will have considered that situation a little more objectively, certainly, he has firearms training and a license from the state and probably went through several checks to make sure he doesn't have a background in irrational thinking or mental illness. I walk down the street with 3-5 times the chance of being attacked and in the past, I've woken up in the hospital twice having been beaten black and blue for no reason. I still don't live i…
/r/MensRights24/12/22 12:30 AM
2

Ok, so yes, in this narrow and utterly pointless variation you have now dreamed up your "right" is real and you can have it. I would assume however the 10th isn't asking the individual to claim new rights they made up, but asking the judicial branch and the states to recognise rights which already existed but were overlooked. I doubt the 1st amendment has any care for things which happen entirely inside your head. But it would let you say that you fear, however you could shout as loud as you lik…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 11:56 PM
3

Do you understand what a right is? A right is ratified by a society. No one has ever thought that society would benefit from ratifying such a right into law. So no right exists. In actual fact, delusional thinking combined with an irrational belief is the basis for a diagnosis and could result in fewer rights not more, depending on what claims you have about your imaginary rights. Fear is not making you safer, it's making you less healthy and making everyone else less safe. Your literally trying…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 11:31 PM
4

No one has a right to fear, no such right exists in any culture or society anywhere on earth. Irrational fears are for children, you're not a child, grow up like everyone else has.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 11:17 PM
0

I don't care. Let them play their game. It's not my game and I'm not going to play it.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 10:36 PM
4

We live in the era of the pre-ban, the very fact he has posted here means he's already pre-banned from participating in many feminist subs.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 10:22 PM
3

Ask yourself, do you want to be safe or feel safe? Do you want more convictions or fewer sexual assaults? Do you want men as allies or men as enemies? Because letting your feminism answer those questions for you has done nothing to make you safer, it hasn't prevented or even reduced sexual violence, it hasn't improved outcomes for anyone. In almost all metrics they have gotten worst for everyone, not better. Despite more attention and resources practically across the board. Do you think your fem…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 10:21 PM
4

She feared a thing happening, she practised a ritualistic behaviour, she convinced herself the fear was real and the behaviour saved her. I spent some time in a hospital for mental health, and there is a delusional pattern of thinking which needs to be broken for her to actually conquer her fear and then become safer. Not that she was statistically in that much danger to start with.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 09:01 PM
2

No, we just don't fear. We conquered our emotions but in women, the emotions conquered them. Fear is an exceptional locus of control for anyone, if you can instil fear in a person you can control what they think, how they feel and how they act. Women are so vulnerable to that that feminism has latched on to the production of fear at the cost of all reason. If feminism was protecting women it'd teach them that the greatest danger to their safety was from someone they know in their own homes... Bu…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 08:55 PM
5

It's only attempted suicide if you actually mean to die. Women clearly don't mean to go through with it or they would go through with it far more often and the increased attempts would result in increased successes.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 08:45 PM
3

That's the problem, women are in constant fear, it's borderline delusional for all but a few of them but fear is a mechanism that makes anyone easy to control and manipulate, once someone is scared they can easily have their minds changed about anything. I learned to control my fear and my anger and most other strong emotions when I was still a child. I know fully grown women who will have emotional meltdowns if you show them government statistics about the real dangers they face and compare the…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 08:40 PM
18

If you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree it will always think it's inferior. As someone who has been in STEM and done the work, it's hard. About 1 in 12 people were women and about half of them succeeded. While more men succeeded as a proportion. You could say that by trying to match men the women denied other men a much higher chance of success.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 08:31 PM
17

It is more likely someone close to her does something than any stranger, by quite a large factor.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 05:13 PM
1

It's a hit piece with no numerical back up what so ever.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 05:34 PM
20

Therapy being polarized is because of the direction resources are applied in training and purpose. The therapists are mostly women being trained to treat women and that results in more women getting positive outcomes in the long run. It's true of a massive swathe of social and health services and it's telling that women's response is to blame men, because that is what get's women more resources and better longer lives. It's pure greed and selfishness.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 05:05 PM
4

Nothing to do with the resources of society being directed almost exclusively at women's mental health and health needs? Nothing at all to to with that.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 05:01 PM
6

No, not proving a rape is not the same as proving a false allegation. A proof for a false allegation would remain needing to be beyond a reasonable doubt. And the very same basic premise you're using comes up when people get convicted of crimes they didn't commit, in every single possible combination of crime and charge. And make no mistake, the system is flawed and massively over worked, it's wrongful conviction rates are only getting higher. So should we just get rid of all possible charges?
/r/MensRights22/12/22 03:27 PM
5

Responsibility is a word that is made of response and ability. Basically, the only time you're responsible for something is if you can by your actions do something about it. If you can't do something about it, you're not responsible for it, regardless. Men are not universally responsible for anything, they can't act to change anything and they can't have caused it, whatever women say.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 10:11 PM
65

Yes, but eventually the child learns to eat from the bowl, which is a pretty important step in learning to eat with others at a table...
/r/MensRights11/12/22 06:10 PM
1

I dunno man. The more I live the more I think Patriarchy as an idea is just wrong thinl, but not wrong. Men did shape the world and so they did shape the world to favour men. We didn't just win, we wrote the rules to manifest the win. And sure, you're right, men also lose more often than women. But that little bit, that nugget of truth, that life is unfair and it doesn't have to be, is sound regardless. The problem with feminism is as you say, it's been taken over to be used as a weapon on the l…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 09:21 PM
3

No feminist can answer this honestly, because feminism does not help men. Sure they say it does, but when you look them dead in the eye and ask for a single local intervention by feminists for men they choke up and start womensplaining about the patriarchy and how masculinity is nothing but toxic and how men do it to themselves like we're divided by sex or something.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 08:16 PM
1

Get your life back together man, and build a better future. That's all you can do, give this passage in your life the big middle finger and rise above it.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 02:03 PM
0

Without men, women wouldn't need reproductive rights?
/r/MensRights29/11/22 10:56 AM
2

The joke is on them; I hate everyone.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 06:26 PM
9

It's sad because the only war is the class war and all other struggles pale in comparison, setting women on men is just a delaying tactic of the real oppressor class.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 03:32 PM
5

Complain to HR that they have complained to HR about you celebrating an international holiday and how you see this as threatening your ability to work at your job in future.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 07:27 PM
1

So because another man hits me I'm not a victim of violence deserving of the resources of society to prevent other men from hitting me? You're just polarising the problem to men vs women. If we direct resources at the violence where it occurs the most we will reduce the violence for EVERYONE the most.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 10:46 AM
28

Thank god the SNP don't have that power, and even if they did the courts would strike it down anyway.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 04:58 PM
19

In reality you're 3-5x more likely to suffer violence than women, and women should actually be scared of the people they know in their own homes, which is much more likely for women. It's madness that they can't even look up basic information and keep spewing rhetoric. Feminism is a cult.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 06:03 PM
6

Yup, the suffragettes were quite clear with the basic message that only women could know the suffering of women and men would not be able to help with that cause. So, turn about, only men know the suffering of men and only men can right that.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 01:05 PM
10

Basically, they're mad that they're being treated equally under the law.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 10:57 AM
2

Probably not, just the natural mechanics of it, one sperm donation can make several babies now, it can probably make several hundred if we try hard enough.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 10:43 AM
3

The gender wars are just a distraction from the class war, it's all managed and arranged for us to consume. The worst it gets the longer the class war will go on for.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 10:10 AM
193

I suggest a complaint and ask to see the policy.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 10:43 AM
2

You only owe child support if you do the impregnating bit. If a woman steals your sperm and uses it, and you can prove it, then you won't owe it. In the case of sperm banks, the bank is doing the impregnating not the donor. That arrangement severs the usual obligations, you also can't claim parental rights over those children.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 12:52 PM
9

This is quite absurd. Women use the same policies throughout all aspects of their life.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 08:55 PM
-2

Biden is quite a crafty chap... Does anyone else see what he did here?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:21 AM
6

Men live shorter lives, die preventable deaths, die more violent deaths, and pay more into retirement funds that they never take out. Misandry for men is systematic and women deny it's even happening.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 11:19 AM
3

It was funny, and not in a good way. My son made it through three episodes and never asked about it again.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:09 PM
18

There is a significant difference between not paying and can't pay. You're assuming all men are dead beats who won't pay, that is the problem with your post.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 09:11 AM
-4

Yes, I get it. You think that's what law is for, it's not, that's called retaliation, revenge, etc. Extra judicial punishments, making examples of person A, so person B fears the same treatment, are typically forbidden in law. It also doesn't work, and never has.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:36 PM
-22

That's called the law... It's not about making examples, it's about actions having consequences.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:20 PM
-27

We don't make examples of people either, because it doesn't work and never has.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:02 PM
-35

If she had been successful and this had come about afterwards, yes. But we tend to punish them for what they did not for what they could have done.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 05:40 PM
24

These people lack real empathy, they pretend to have it, but really they're psycopaths.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 03:50 PM
11

Lies, women get a huge chunk of the basic resources of society, if the resources were split more fairly men would have fewer problems.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:12 PM
1

People who claim it's not a zero-sum game, like feminists.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:09 PM
1

He can never defend himself from her no matter what the actual circumstances.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 03:19 PM
1

Yes, way more. There has always been scope in society for improvements, feminist just hijacked the equality bandwagon and pushed men off it.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 12:10 PM
3

I mean, I'm happy sex work has become so mainstream. But make no mistake, it is sex work.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:26 AM
3

It would because men would defend themselves from them and they would realise that we have for a very long time restrained ourselves from using violence against women and girls... For like as long as history can remember we policed ourselves, don't hit girls, don't hit women, even if they hit you... It WOULD open their eyes overnight.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 03:28 PM
2

If don't want to mate, don't dress like you want to mate. That's my advice to women everywhere, young men are not in total control, that's how we ended up with nearly 8 billion people on the planet, and that is not going to change no matter what lies they tell themselves.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 06:09 PM
2

I barely use it, and when I do I have followed only a few people I also follow on other services. The rest is garbage.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 07:32 PM
2

Ha, they are cucked, they have had women cheat on them and tell them it's their fault.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:52 PM
28

Not only it is more prevalent than people realise, but it also has consequences that are absurdly disproportionate. My second boss killed himself over this shit, his ex took his life by force of law. She later was found out and admitted to friends that she had lied. No one cared at all, not one little bit.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 02:48 PM
0

Yes, there are. And it's a travesty that your state isn't realizing the lost resources you're describing. People are the primary resource in war, ideas, problem-solving, and strategies, all come from people. Being autistic you're used to very rigid rules and the rules have just changed so drastically you find yourself paralyzed and unable to cope. No one is going to help you, sorry. You either help yourself or accept your fate. If you need shelter, ask everyone for shelter, if you need food, fin…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:14 PM
6

Marshal Law is an exception to human rights laws. Arguing from the perspective of peacetime isn't going to sway anyone. Even a pacifist can find a job to help the war effort. I mean in previous wars even civilians who argued against the war could be shot as deserters, so you have at least one step more down the path to tyranny to go before you get to the end. If you can't find something that needs to be done, ASK SOMEONE. Just clearing the rubble is a monumental task, I'm sure you have the physi…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:11 PM
2

No, I don't think you understand. Feminism is about PERPETUATING SUFFERING, not ending it. So long as it exists a lot of powerless women get power and crave that at all costs. MRA's are about ending it. MRA's was to become unnecessary by intent and design.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 05:20 PM
3

Do you think this isn't exactly what they wanted to manufacture? They point to the extremists and claim we're all like that to recruit other women into their cult.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 01:15 PM
10

Wrong, men suffer violence resulting in injury and death at 5x the rate of women. Men die preventable deaths and suffer workplace injuries at a significantly higher rate than women. Men retire later and pay more into pension pools while women get paid most of the pension pool because the men are dead before they can retire. Women on the other hand don't want to be looked at in public or talked to by people who don't flatter them. It's not the same thing. It's not the same thing at all. Safe spac…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:04 PM
3

Shit goes in roundabouts, what you sow today, you reap tomorrow.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 07:47 AM
19

No, people could sue the company, but the company can't sue anyone. They aided and abetted a criminal enterprise... Circumstances are meaningless once a conviction occurs.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 08:37 PM
2

I mean present-day or historically? Can you not imagine being a Jew in NAZI Germany, gassed in the back of a van, or put through hell in a camp... No one is murdering you for your beliefs, no one is singling you out or specialising in attacking you just for being you... Well, a vocal minority is but that vocal minority exist for every group and I assure you there are classes of people who are literally being murdered, put through reeducation camps, having their organs harvested, and worst. Think…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:45 PM
7

The Police informed her that her ex-partner was a risk to her child. If it'd been a female rapist and a male parent the same thing would have happened. I for one wouldn't let my ex see our son if the Police came and told me this, because if I had I'd be considered a risk to him by social services.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:41 PM
2

2 years is actually a good outcome. I mean sure it could be longer but in reality, it could have also been suspended pending good behaviour.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 10:39 PM
2

Everyone gets shit from everyone else, don't take it personally. I assure you that others have it MUCH worst than you do.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 09:02 PM
2

Just look at the average age at death and compare it to the pension age, then compare the pensions paid to the pensions received... Men work themselves to (preventable) death to pay a pension they never get, women live longer and enjoy that money from men's pensions... If that isn't a clear indication men are disadvantaged then I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 05:54 AM
7

Haha, we have had a lot of troll posts in the last while. Mods better be careful what they let pass.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:28 AM
2

Hear hear.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 10:29 AM
2

Don't even try, that's an echo chamber, you can't win.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 10:54 AM
15

Men are more resilient to suffering than women, that's right. Because, and get this, WE SUFFER MORE.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:09 PM
0

Yes, I'd like another child, I just can't find a womb for one. And no I'm not being anti-women, I just had one too many bad experiences and have run out of tolerance for bullshit. Guess I want a peaceful life more than another child.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 10:39 AM
4

Who the fuck cares? The fact is people are changing their gender, and the science IS behind that they can do that, just learn to fucking read and it'll become apparent that there have always been trans people in societies. Perhaps we should ban anyone who's transphobic so we don't waste our time with this bullshit?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:48 AM
9

For a lot of people that is exactly the point of Feminism. There is no actual equality to be had of course, not between any two people, regardless of their gender or sex. There is an approximate equality of sorts, but that just won't do for Feminism. They want actual equality in every sense of the word, along as it's their equality, they don't want equality wth men, and they're not asking for that.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 08:05 PM
5

Humans can do whatever the fuck they like...
/r/MensRights30/07/22 05:59 PM
3

I have had several pretty emotionally underdeveloped crushes outside of my age range over the years. Never children, since I was a child, but a decade or two here or there doesn't hurt anyone... I am however quite emotionally stunted and socially inept, so it's probably got something to do with who would tolerate me socially, so who I had access too. I do wonder how many people just like me end up falling for someone who is not legal and don't know the difference. Aught to be someone you can cal…
/r/MensRights29/07/22 05:36 PM
1

In what countries system? In the UK it's a pretty fucking shallow and immature system I'm describing it accurately.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 01:50 PM
1

Ah yes, but where does it actually turn up. Also, one sentence on Reddit and you're judging my capacity to think, I think maybe you need a mirror.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 09:40 AM
-2

lol. Aye, this is reddit, it's not a diatribe on the subject. Our media amplifies what is already there, they didn't pervade by themselves. This is how we always were only in the past we had no amplification to our voices.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 06:23 AM
1

People have BECOME that way due to the way we have organised our society and culture. That isn't what we see if we send researchers into the jungles to asses the small village societies they have, they all work hard and they all share the work. They have none of our problems, they have a much more pure nature than you're describing.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 05:49 AM
-2

That's what the right has programmed you to believe... But the further left we travel the more we will do and the less we will need selfishness. We will have it nonetheless, but we don't need it.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 05:39 AM
-3

The left hopes to promote positive changes by making people less desperate and less self-interested... The right requires that doesn't happen. I mean, otherwise, we're fucked, right?
/r/MensRights29/07/22 05:14 AM
-4

It's hard to find a left-leaning state that is authoritarian though. The reality is that the tools used by the right are often no different than the tools used by the authoritarian. If it quacks, it's a duck.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 05:11 AM
-2

In the UK our country is leaning so right we're going to capsize yea. All authorities want to preserve themselves, even when they're working against the interests of the people they once represented. Law is not right or wrong, it's actions and consequences. If the right makes the law they will outlaw the left, which they have done for the last decade at least. But yea, as an anarchist thinking person, I believe hierarchies rarely ever self justify and then they do they often exist long enough to…
/r/MensRights29/07/22 05:08 AM
1

You're old enough to leave and not look back... They only miss you when you're gone.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 04:38 AM
-20

Right is authoritarian, with more control and less freedom. Left is counter-authoritarian, with less control more freedom What we have in the UK right is as right as the law allows, and they're changing the law to allow more right and less left possible.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 04:31 AM
2

The problem isn't men, it's the society that offers men no help and then blames them for the outcome. If women and girls get anywhere from 2/3rd to 4/5's of the societal resources then we have a discrimination problem. If we can see that men die preventable deaths and society keeps skewing resources toward women, then that's discrimination. Women want men to be blamed because that's billions of euros/dollars/pounds being used to make women comfortable, while men provide more GDP and get less of …
/r/MensRights29/07/22 04:17 AM
-4

You clearly have not been paying attention. The state currently leans so far right that we have lost sight of the edge.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 02:21 AM
1

It does, but the law was passed having major review, people and interest groups had the chance to speak on it and all avenues were explored. Though I doubt they explored the murder for organs avenue. All I'm going to say on that is this isn't Israel.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 10:46 AM
1

I'm happy to donate my organs and I don't know why people have a problem with it. However if they do they have a lifetime to fill in an online form and add their NHS number and then they won't be used automatically, it'll be up to their next of kin.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 09:31 AM
1

I a lot of countries Organs are opt out not opt in. So sperm is something that can technically already be used. I dunno, perhaps we need clauses in our laws for this sort of thing. Exigent circumstances may appear where is prudent to harvest sperm and eggs from the dead. And yes, I'm assuming a male partner would now have rights to a dead female partners eggs if they had a womb waiting.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 12:51 PM
7

You have to be alive to have bodily autonomy. I'm not entirely sure what happens to an estate if a child is born after death or even conceived after death.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:40 PM
8

One of the only ways to solve a problem is to accurate identify the cause of the problem. This dogma does not do that and therefore those people who follow it do NOT want to solve problems, they want to revel in them.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 11:25 AM
2

Fair societal treatment is probably not what anyone wants. Society is an asshole.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:53 PM
2

If rich men could get pregnant... The rest of us would be baby makers against our will.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:37 AM
3

Last time I researched this I went to the UK's office of national statistics and looked up the number directly from several documents they had published from across the country. Men were 3-5x times more likely to suffer random violence than women, depending on where in the country they were. I know feminism claims women are the greater victims but they're not. What is actually interesting is women are more likely to be attacked in their homes by someone they know by quite a big margin... Very fe…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 05:03 PM
6

Actually they do, men are more likely to be attacked and more likely to be injured and more likely to die in random street violence.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:49 PM
6

I'm not scared to walk down the street, I conquered my irrational fears as a child, I know I'm in more danger than women are, I do it anyway. Women want everything to bend to their irrational beliefs and fears. It's absurd.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:57 PM
2

They don't want the equality of men. What person in their right mind would. The equality they want it the equality of royalty.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:56 PM
6

Police, Fire and Ambulances services would be crippled. Women would suffer greatly for their stupidity. I actually knew a women who said this was a good idea.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:26 PM
1

When you have to refactor sexual assault to mean looking just at someone in a public place then yea, there is a serious problem with the rules you play by. And if feminism wants to change the rules, then so can we.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:48 PM
1

Ha. <-- That about sums up my concerns.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:45 PM
9

Perhaps, but it's a vocal minority, and other women don't seem to police their own. The effect is the same regardless... Which is a problem for men.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 08:18 PM
2

Cases like this are easy to get set aside and reheard, well normally.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 11:11 AM
49

There seems to be a pro feminist mod... mod team need to sort that shit out.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 12:55 PM
6

It is done. But we fight two battles, one to get anything done and two to get the feminists to allow us to get anything done. In my life I've seen several good efforts destroyed by feminists, from pulling fire alarms to literally making false claims to police to get people arrested. Feminists won't let men organise. Plus if we took a page from feminism, we'd be declared terrorists too.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:39 AM
16

It's not reverse sexism, it's just more sexism.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 03:22 PM
11

Little boys can't even retract their foreskin, there is no way to clean it and it's fine for 12-15 years like that...
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:42 AM
1

Because it is unnecessary in the modern world. Because it's done for religious or sociological reasons. Because there is evidence that it reduces the sensitivity of the head of the penis. No good reason exists to expose a new born child to that pain i their genitals, it probably causes connections in the brain that then never go away.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:37 AM
39

In the eyes of the feminists you can do no right, nothing you try will satisfy them. It's a game to them, they don't have any regard for anyone else's welfare... And that's on a good day. On a bad day they actively try to hurt you, want you harmed by others and try their best to gaslight to make it your fault. Fuck them and the horse they rode in on.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 09:29 AM
6

I think they're saying that only white men are proffering an opinion... The gross generalization is however offensive to all white men, so I don't see it as them trying to win votes.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 09:03 AM
6

Education, social care, etc. You only need to look in young offenders institute to see boys being let down sociologically. Then look at all the young men living on the streets. Men and Boys are treated like this because of feminism. If we had humanism this would never have happened.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 08:16 PM
6

Feminism chants loudly that is about equal rights... The loudest voices are the ones people hear. Have a problem with that, POLICE YOUR SELF. They don't include resources for men and boys almost at all, feminism has made sure of that.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 08:02 PM
15

I agree. But you have to understand one thinkg Feminism is a war a cry to hate men for a lot of women, men aren't making that bit up. When was the last time you saw a feminist make a shelter for men, or provide health and social care lobbying for men, or education, etc... It just doesn't happen, and men aren't allowed to do it for themselves, to the chant by feminists that men are not oppressed so they don't need help and asking for it is hating on women.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 12:24 PM
1

Well the war will be a lot longer if they don't see the views of other nations and peoples. Peace has to come some time, and it'll only come with serious consideration for the realities.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:04 PM
1

Yes, but very few see the problem before they're consumed by it.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:14 PM
2

Two reason; one, it's a powerful weapon. Two, it's partly true, some men are misogynistic assholes. It also completely fair to say some women are misandrist cunts. Just because those things are true however doesn't mean we should try to divide ourselves and pick sides, we have much more in common than we think.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:16 AM
6

That's a very simple way to look at it.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 06:21 PM
28

There is a very complex set of reasons Ukraine has ended up being the first nation invaded in Europe in a long time. NATO, Ethnic Cleansing, Anti Russian sentiment in the East, pro war propaganda, Russian attitudes toward Ukraine in general. Just blaming men is an easy win for a second rate politician.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 03:08 PM
1

Well I was here with pn6, do you know that name, he made the subreddit.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 08:49 PM
1

Look I get it, you think everything and everyone must agree with you personal opinion to be welcome here. But as my membership predates yours by years I'm thinking you acting as some gatekeeper is fricking preposterous. I have been banned from 2x for many years, practically within a month of it opening.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 07:38 PM
1

Dude, I have a dick and a kid. Your assertions are stupid. Nature won't change no matter how angry you get, just forget it. The status quo isn't harmful if you don't stick your dick in stupid. Once the first cell divides that's a new being, and sure until it's 20 odd weeks it's not a person, but it is not you and you don't have any say in its existence.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:52 PM
1

I mean yea, isn't that basis for divorce?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:46 PM
1

No, your sperm belonged to you. Once the egg is fertilised that's not RNA any more, it's DNA, and you don't own it. Nor does the female, it just happens that it's inside the female and that gives the female control that the male doesn't get. That is not a function of society, or law, it's a function of biology, it won't change no matter how much we rage. Yes, the choice men have is don't fertilize the egg... That's it, don't do that and you'll be good. I agree with most sensible people, in cases…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:44 PM
1

No, you pay for your genes. Otherwise we have a scenario were some men will just go around making children, potentially hundreds and leave society to pay for them. If you make a child, you pay for your child.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 07:43 AM
-14

Sorry but no. Once your sperm have fertilized the egg then you're responsible for your genes. I'm not having a society were men can go around making babies they don't have to pay for, but we as society do. You'd get to spread your seed far and wind with no responsibility, that's not equitable or equal in any sense of the words.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:41 PM
3

They don't believe that's what they want. They want eqaulity with men as they understand it, they think men have power over everything and everyone, so they want that. They really are fighting the wrong battles, it's a class war not a culture war or gender war. But that's the thing, the more polarized their beliefs the less likely they're to see the real enemy of equality is wealthy elitists with billions and their own media outlets.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 11:16 AM
7

If I only come to be having sex with you because you consented then it's hard to prove I intended to have sex with you against your will... Mens rea is a thing.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:09 PM
6

Why though? Why stoop to the lowest place, it doesn't make anything better for anyone. You can't make your candle brighter by snuffing out someone else's.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:28 AM
-3

This isn't about Abortion people, this is about bodily autonomy. You think they're just going to do this to women, you're wrong. Stop gendering this problem, stop thinking it's us vs them, stop thinking we don't have things in common. Put aside your differences for just a moment and think. If they can do this to women, they can do much worst to everyone. You have an organ someone else needs, well you don't have bodily autonomy so you can't refuse to hand it over. Yes, that is where this is going…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:17 PM
3

In this context it perhaps the right to have your voice heard equally by your government. But I get it, it's not quite the proper usage.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 07:19 PM
2

Equitable use of public funds and resources, health and social welfare, criminal justice, education, etc. Historic evidence suggest women and girls were under provided for, but contemporary evidence now says that men and boys are disadvantaged and the problem only gets worst. Compensation for the age gap, we pay more pension and receive about half of what women do because we tend to die much earlier and often of preventable deaths. Until the age gap is made up I suggest men get significant addit…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:05 PM
0

Civil suits cost a small fortune and often you can't recover enough to cover the costs. Criminal charges would be filed, but prosecutors are reluctant to go after women for crimes like these.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 06:27 AM
12

Toxic gender norms. There is the problem right there. Who told you that, other women? A premise of the original rights movement is that only women can know women's suffrage... So only men can know men's suffrage. Letting other women tell you what men need or want is oppression... You should shut the fuck up and start listening to men tell you what's happening. Men and Women are different creatures and what works for one won't work for the other. Nothing in your feminism has prepared you to be qu…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:58 AM
-18

The rape claim is historical, so it's not retaliation.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 06:53 PM
5

Yes, the aggravating factor there though is the capacity for the victim to defend themselves, women and children are typically less able to defend themselves. Which should be an aggravating factor if you ask me, taken on a case by case basis. Laws like OP has posted about however are absurd and arbitrary though and have no purpose in a justice system.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 12:50 PM
4

Yea, that's not the crime. There has to be a crime which is aggravated by the hate. Just saying, god I hate women, isn't a crime.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 10:26 AM
-3

Misandry by definition, no, I'm OK with hating women being a hate crime. Misandry as it's understood to be now, with just talking or looking at someone being a hate crime. Fuck that, that impacts on basic freedoms.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 09:24 AM
6

Most trans people I know see both sides and therefore recognise that men can be oppressed too. Trans isn't a choice, those people don't take med's that hurt them and undergo surgeries just because they want too.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 02:17 AM
1

He didn't wake me up.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 04:11 PM
3

My son let me have an extra 4 hours in bed. I was very happy when I woke up. Have a good fathers day fathers and parents (cause some people don't identify as fathers).
/r/MensRights19/06/22 04:09 PM
3

No, that's stupid. Bodily autonomy is pretty important to human rights. I don't think human civilization will devolve that much in the future.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 01:46 PM
2

Not sworn off but I have no need for one now. Have a son, raising him myself, women seem a little pointless to me.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 01:39 PM
0

Feminism has become something no one should want. Humanism is what I aim for.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 11:40 AM
3

Women would rather revel in feelings than accept facts. This won't change and is a clear indication that men should be cautious around women, because that is dangerous.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 04:30 PM
4

No matter how loud you are there is always some feminists present to shut you down and silence you. I've seen this in college, in university, in work, in my social life. They just never stop blaming men for everything and trying to hurt men as much as they can in every way they can.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 08:26 PM
1

hugs
/r/MensRights13/06/22 06:37 PM
7

Yup, from a very young age I learned women are just as likely to sexualise youth as men.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 09:17 AM
59

You should never punish the children for the acts of the parents. It's patently unethical and immoral.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:22 PM
3

I'll be honest, TV Licensing is a joke. No one is requiered to answer any questions and there is not investigatory power TVL actually use. The people who come around are high pressure salesmen who threaten and sometimes assault people.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:09 PM
2

I'm sorry but I know plenty of women who need several outifts a month and thousands of pounds of make up just to go to work. Men don't MAKE you do anything, stop passing blame here. You're an adult you exercise choices and face the consequences like the rest of us.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 05:40 PM
5

I would say that shoes/garment/clothing waste and make up production/use off sets this claim quite considerably. I'm still wearing 15 year old clothes. I fix my torn and ripped clothes and I wear my shoes to near uselessness. You rarely see women who will do that though.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 04:22 PM
3

The men who created and shaped society are all dead and we do not punish children for the actions of parents, so it's utter bollox.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 04:03 PM
4

You need to get her filing when she asked for custody, because she HAD to indicate if a parent was available or not, and if she did indicate a parent was available you'd have been contacted for your input. However, if she didn't, then you can get that thrown out and go pick up your son, as you're on the birth certificate you should have parental rights, she does not.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:09 AM
4

Serious drug addiction, that takes over ones life like this, does make someone a victim. Imagine carrying a child and then losing it over something like this, it'd be soul breaking.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 01:58 AM
0

No I'd point out a single stab would is a very odd occurrence, and in most cases of violence you get multiple wounds, even hesitating to actually kill before, or carrying on stabbing long after the lethal blow has been made. I'd ask questions, make observations, and deduce from that my own idea. You'd attack me for no agreeing exactly as you do on everything. YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 03:26 PM
1

I don't need to pretend I would, because I would. I always ask why.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 08:32 AM
-12

There are all sorts of questions to be asked about this before we get angry. Was she actually an abuse victim. Did she act out of necessity or premeditation. A single stab wound is an unusual death, normally people either hesitate a lot or they just keep stabbing after they're already dead. It's an odd case.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:57 PM
3

Chaps, we're never going to see the end of this. There will ALWAYS be someone who tells these lies. Let's be better than this. We need to focus on OUR OWN, and not on the lies told by those who oppose us ideologically. We need to be better than this, out hope is not in fighting these fuckers, but in supporting ourselves. Any anyway, it looks like the SJW's have this authors number, they know this is hate, even if they can't readily say it's misandry..
/r/MensRights30/05/22 08:40 PM
22

No, this is offensive to people with mental illnesses. Radical Feminists know exactly what they're doing and why, they chose to do it.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 10:19 PM
3

You can't be a racist and say you support the rights of ethnic minorities. You can't be a TERF and say you support the rights of Trans people. You can't be a feminist and say you support the rights of all humans. Those things are in opposition to one another. The dichotomy you're trying to justify isn't justifiable. If you really want to support men and women, you need to consider if the ideology you're identifying as is actually the one you want to support.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 11:20 PM
3

No, just my opinion. But if he did one thing to her then her statement is honest and not false and he can't win. Even if she had mutilated his genitals in his sleep, fired them up and fed them to him as breakfast she would still win this case.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 11:08 PM
7

Thank you.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 10:45 PM
7

In all fairness you have picked your side, we're not berating you for being you, we're berating you for the conscious choice you have made in spite of the contrary evidence you admit exists. We are helping ourselves by discriminating between those who make moral choices and those who follow the rhetoric and dogma of feminism. Feminism hurts everyone.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 10:42 PM
6

Sadly he lost. She wins if he did one single thing wrong no matter if she did a million things to him. Civil cases are usually all or nothing. The jury has little choice in the matter. Though I suppose they could refuse to render a verdict.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 10:39 PM
1

Having gone through both, I'm telling you women are more likely to lie than men.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 03:54 PM
12

No, it was one about kitchen knives.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 04:42 PM
4

The Truth sets people free, it doesn't hurt anyone.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 04:15 PM
23

I reported it for advocating violence to the mods and to reddit, I expect nothing will happen. Apparently murdering men in their sleep is OK with everyone now.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 03:45 PM
1

We don't want them to advocate for us, we want them to let us advocate for ourselves. Feminism destroys men who advocate for men and that's the problem, how can a feminist know male suffrage, they're not male and they can not know.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 12:19 PM
5

Women can abuse men, can confirm from personal experience.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 11:24 AM
2

There is the bottom of the barrel, and then there is this shit.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 05:25 PM
1

Straw man arguments don't you make you clever. You don't lose all sensitivity, that would be stupid, you just lose some over your lifetime, that is literally how the nervous system of every living organism works.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:43 PM
2

Wow, did you miss basic biology. You literally do lose sensitivity in all your nervous system over your life time. People with injuries to nerves literally rely on this process to heal, some people can end up in agony because their nerve endings are over stimulated, and eventually the brain just recalibrates.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:35 PM
-2

Not asking for it, legislature awarded it. Like I said, solutions don't have to be fair, they just have to be legal. If someone employs a person with severe needs they have to pay to adjust the working practices to meet those needs. That could cost much more than a few paid days off. And like I said, I'm all for men taking these days too. I'm pretty sure the courts are going to fix this law when it's seen through the lens of other equality laws.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:10 PM
6

Please read about how the nervous system works, because I'm telling you right, stimulated nerves become less sensitive over time, every time, without exception.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:07 PM
5

Sorry but the nervous system doesn't work like that. If I took any nerve on your body and stimulated it over the course of a lifetime you would go from being able to feel that, to not being able to feel it. The brain is conditioned to do this, a baby can feel everything, every minute touch or temperature change, but adults can't, because of that very process.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:05 PM
-7

lol Is it a special privilege if differences are acknowledged? Do we take sticks from cripples, glasses from the blind... Do we police who deserves to have sticks or glasses. Some women are, by rights, disabled some days of the month. We can't really argue about it because it's true. What society does about that is never going to be fair. I'm all for men claiming period leave though, I am some days just unable to do things and extra time off would be perfect for that.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 05:30 PM
14

Unfortunately you have probably lost significant sensitivity in your genitals because of this. You can never get that back.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 04:06 PM
2

Imagine going down that road not expecting severe retaliation from every agency you call on to protect you. The problem isn't the law, it's people upholding the law and they're not likely pull on any strings that unravel their entire game. Sometimes the best way to win is not to lose.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 11:05 AM
6

It's quite funny, I would reckon that for the most part educated men are less likely to use violence against women, though maybe they is something they can weaponise too. It's kind of sad, I want so bad to unite as one and take on the real battle, the class war. But women just can't get further into the struggle than main stream feminist tropes. We truly stand divided.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 10:18 AM
7

They don't want that though. They want men to be disadvantaged by their efforts, because they can't see any way up other than putting others down.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 09:55 AM
-22

Yes, but WE are better than that. Look forward not backward.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 09:51 AM
-27

I mean come on, different era's have different views, we're way way beyond that shit today, at least I think we are.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 09:22 AM
1

Men get to chose if they donate their sperm or not, usually. By having or not having sex. Yes, but women have more choices than men, nature isn't fair, but that's not reason to demand women carry all babies to term or die trying. Ahhh, I get you now. You should have been clearer. To put it simply the fertilized embryo isn't the women's either. It's it's own life form, but it requires a host to gestate in. What happens after birth is god awful, but mankind made that not me, and certainly not natu…
/r/MensRights15/05/22 07:28 AM
1

Women don't deny men any choices over thier own bodies mate. Men are doing that to women. We all play by the same rules, they've been the same since the inception of life, they won't change now no matter how much your rage. Nature is by it's very make up UNFAIR, get over it. Once you sperm has fertilized the egg, it's no longer your sperm by definition of it now being DNA instead of RNA. Your sperm ceases to exist at that point.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 07:16 AM
-3

No, that doesn't mean you can deny women a choice because you don't have one. That's not how reality works. I'm 100% for bodily autonomy, abortions are fine with me, except for non medical need late stage abortions, those are just cruel.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 07:09 AM
-1

Your choice, incase you're too stupified, is to NOT HAVE ANY SEX. Or at the very least vet your partners and don't stick it in crazy women. Men have been practising this for millennia. It's not a new concept, it's the ONLY choice you have on the matter, I suggest you exercise it.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 06:59 AM
-2

You realise no one is making you have sex and there is as yet no means to undo the sex act... You have a choice.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 06:53 AM
-23

Oh come on, do we really need to go there? Bodily autonomy is something we all need to get behind. The women who're saying that are talking to men who want a pick and mix approach to bodily autonomy. In reality women won't get the legislature to change the law unless they have a good number of men on their side.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 12:52 PM
2

Until you realise that we don't document reliably men who fail to commit suicide, because they often never get noticed.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:32 PM
1

When couldn't they exactly?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:03 PM
9

Violence means different things to men and women, Women think being shouted at or talk down to is violence, men think getting your nose broke is violence. Go figure.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 07:59 PM
1

This is one of those times where I don't want to make any counter arguments. This is a bodily autonomy problem, if they can do that to women they can do worst to everyone. The line has to be drawn and we have to be united.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 11:29 PM
8

Just wait and you'll see it turned on it's head by misandrists.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 11:20 AM
0

One assumes the Police checked the CCTV which covers everything in the network. In any case, the actual conviction isn't just for looking at someone.
/r/MensRights30/04/22 01:21 PM
1

As she got off, he followed, so she decided to wait on the station concourse for five minutes before boarding her bus. He stood, less than a metre away, looking. After several trains came and left without the man getting on, she "bolted" for the stairs. "I turned around and he was just waving at me," she says. He stalked her mate, he got time for that as he should have. He'll be out in 11 if he's a good boy. We don't deny some men harass women or cause them to fear, we just deny it's every man l…
/r/MensRights30/04/22 12:48 PM
1

You can't chose what other people can or can't do with their bodies, any more than they can chose what you do with yours. By denying that you're effectively denying those people their identity and representation. Denying their existence. All you need do is to accept that those people got dealt substantially different lives than you, that you can't know what they go through and that they're not doing this just because, but because they need too. Many trans people have killed themselves off the ba…
/r/MensRights29/04/22 07:55 AM
3

It's just a scheme to get attention, they will be back once they realise they have lost their cult followers on Reddit.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 02:08 PM
2

Everything I see women complain about, they do it too. It's hypocrisy nearly every time.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 08:20 AM
7

I wonder what damages and compensation he's looking for from Heard... I think she may be in the poor house after this.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 07:52 PM
9

This isn't sick days. This is extra time off, with pay. Those are two entirely different things and should not be compared. Also, what rational person wouldn't take these days off. More for less is pretty appealing to most human beings.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 02:27 PM
1

money for sex is coercion to then, no?
/r/MensRights23/04/22 01:47 PM
2

I never want to have to deal with the bullshit kangaroo court known as family and/or divorce court again. Don't cohabit then, really is your only choice in the matter.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 12:25 PM
1

I don't really care what Twitter thinks, no one should. It's an awful place to learn a moral and ethical compass from.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 11:38 AM
-1

Bro, literally the first reply, the one you're arguing is legitimate is denying the existence and validity of trans and intersex people. Calling them a myth. Maybe you should be careful who you argue for in future. Also, I can't have a victim complex. I'm not trans or intersex.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 11:34 AM
0

Not cancelling me numb nuts. The first reply was that transex is a myth, that not right is it, you know it's not a myth don't you?
/r/MensRights20/04/22 11:29 AM
0

Denying the existence of trans and intersex people is awful.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:46 AM
0

And another one, shit man how many transphobes are there in here?
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:43 AM
1

Found another one.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:07 AM
1

Why? Legally they have to let me in or they're discriminating against a protected characteristic. I wouldn't want to, I'm not an asshole.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:06 AM
-2

That's not the medical particulars, it's just a way for them to say trans people aren't valid.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:05 AM
-5

Ha, you're funny. You can change your mind, but no one can change it for you.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 09:31 PM
-19

50 years of intense study by experts all over the planet and you think you know better. B I G O T, spell it for me now.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 09:16 PM
-6

No he didn't. He made an argument that people who have sex reassignment are a myth, he is wrong, he is a bigot, you should not defend such things.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 09:15 PM
-17

Sex reassignment surgery is not a myth and attempts to rationalise away trans people as having the sex they chose by saying sex can't be changed. And yes, it's called gender affirmation surgery now, but it was and is called sex reassignment surgery too. It's not going away no matter how much you insist you know better than transfolk.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 08:29 PM
-48

Found the transphobe.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 08:06 PM
-17

Honestly, I have a GID but I'm not trans, so I don't know exactly. It does mean that just dressing like one isn't enough to be one. Usually to get a certificate to start a sex change you need to live as a women for 2 years and show considerable effort to alter your lifestyle in that regard. I've dated trans people, it's incredibly difficult to nail down exactly what makes them trans. Not really the sort of thing I'd expect to go down well here, lots of transphobic people who don't understand tha…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 07:41 PM
13

In Dublin it's actually how a psychologist with a speciality in gender identity disorder identifies you. I could get in, because I have a gender identity disorder. But random bloke of the street in drag or femme or whatever would also have to behave like a women, which is not something most men can do.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 06:54 PM
6

You all need to realise this is OK, in a healthy society we don't care about this sort of thing. It's the unhealthy demands of feminism that are wrong on this topic.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 06:52 PM
21

A basic premise of the women's rights movement was that men could not know the women's suffrage and therefore could not help them or free them from it, women had to do it for themselves, and they were right. Women have obviously forgotten that and believe they can help men, when it invariably hurts men. But perhaps that was the intention all along.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 12:54 PM
2

Reddit should be whatever the people make it. Each sub has it's own merits and sometimes the best way to do things it many different ways. If Menslib wants to ban people then that's their prerogative isn't it.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 12:31 PM
4

Yup, it's a shit show over there. Echo chamber deluxe... I pointed out that for all it's efforts feminism wasn't perfect... Perm ban 28 day mute.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 12:30 PM
5

Yes, it's against reddits rules to cyber stalk people, even across reddit.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 07:39 AM
2

Yea, and how it automatically assumes you can't believe all men.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 11:47 PM
-3

Why would anyone be thinking about money in a time like this. You have the luxury of not being shot at mate, think on that. I don't think anyone in Ukraine is even thinking about money at a time like this, when your life, the lives of your loved and all the memories you ever made together are on the line. Beginning to get really pissed off with some of the content here. Ukraine is at war, this is not managed, it's not political, it's the most pointless wars there has been in a long time. It's no…
/r/MensRights12/04/22 10:04 PM
0

Ha, you're assuming that kid went to school. Some places don't allow girls to go to school at all. And yes, it's fucked up imo too. But there are entire nations that barring some risk of harm, allow it. And who're we too demand they change that, just another country/culture with another rule/view.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 10:52 PM
15

Yes, and I'm completely happy with that outcome.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 08:08 PM
-47

To be fair a lot of incels brought that on us by being quite extremist about their beliefs.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 04:41 PM
-13

I mean as a full time single parent, this is what I've done. State basically pays me psuedo-indefinetly to raise my son and keep my house. There is a reason why the state does this though, other than generosity, it's because we're barely replacing the workers we have and growth while keeping future wages requires we have a surplus of minimally educated workers to juggle between low paying jobs.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 04:41 PM
7

I'd like to not care what feminists think, but as what they think is manifesting as public policy affecting me and my son I have a real interest in shutting down their insane dogmatic ideology.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 04:37 PM
7

The problem is that the law sees it absolutely. https://www.ageofconsent.net/continent/europe A 14 y/o can have sex with 40 y/o in most of Europe. Unless they have responsibility or are family. The law concerns itself with real harm, not imagined. So the problem with a teacher having sex with a student isn't the sex, it's the dynamic being abused to achieve that and the trust that was put in to the teacher... The sex is often not even a factor in a conviction and sentencing.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 02:46 PM
3

Arguably it can be done, by someone who doesn't have influence over them and who is of a comparable age. Which means it's a little more fantasy than reality. But I don't think they mention that sort of thing in sex ed. In some places the age of consent is much lower. That isn't to say those children are any more or less developed, just legally they can fuck till the cows come home and it's not illegal, which they often do with no harm done.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 02:35 PM
2

I mean, I don't really care what feminists say, they don't speak for everyone, or sometimes anyone. Abortion is a medical procedure that women need to have available to them for a whole host of biological and sociological reasons. I don't see why anyone would argue with that point. Feminists just like to create controversy to control people, they don't really want to win, because the fight is what empowers them.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 06:31 PM
7

I bet the number of incidences goes up now they have told women this is another way they can have power over men.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 06:22 PM
73

Because foreskins are a commodity... The hospitals don't just throw them out, they sell them.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 08:51 PM
1

In reality most men are less able to control the outcome than most women. Patriarchy takes the upper elite class and assumes every man has the same power to control the outcome as they do. Which is obviously bullshit of the highest order. Patriarchy has been used to prevent men from changing the outcomes too, because only women are allowed to control the social order now. At it's inception I doubt anyone ever intended patriarchy theory to go where it did. There can be no doubt that mostly men ro…
/r/MensRights05/04/22 10:06 AM
3

Hey, simply put, two reasons, both intertwined. One, feminism is teaching women to fear, literally as a locus of control. Two, as things go men do perpetrate a lot of violence on others and while it's a minority commit the worst acts, our low level behaviours trigger the worst responses in women, see one. It's prejudice of course, but women and feminism truly do believe that somehow their prejudice is special and justified and that men deserve it because we are all oppressors, potential oppresso…
/r/MensRights04/04/22 11:30 AM
7

It's weird, men's gender roles actually seem to have gotten worst. You'd think men earning the money would mean they have the money, but walk down any high-street and you can see the market place doesn't cater for men much at all. Probably because they're not the ones spending the money.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 03:06 PM
3

Gender roles have changed a lot, and it varies by generation, but generally women are valued throughout history for their ability to provide offspring, which was also one of the things most likely to kill them. Not so much with today's younger generations, but some places it's still the case.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 02:20 PM
8

But what about the feeling that it's right! That's important too, right? /s
/r/MensRights02/04/22 02:18 PM
2

At it's all core all suffrage is personal. One of the basic premises of women's suffrage, pretty much no matter which team women fell in to, was that only women knew their suffrage and only women could free themselves from it. A very simple, but important thing to understand, no? Basically men no more know the suffrage of women than women know the suffrage of men. And I wish Feminism would stick to that premise, because women trying to do right by men, but not involving men, has caused a lot of …
/r/MensRights02/04/22 08:56 AM
5

I dontate, I advocate, I spread the message. But then I have found that any real efforts get jumped on by anti-MRA feminists who have no limits on what they will do to prevent mens-suffrage.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 09:26 AM
13

Totally unfit to be parents.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 07:52 AM
1

Well said.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 07:09 AM
7

We do, but we also need to overcome the feminists who want to disempower us when we try. Until we can overcome that we can't hope to help one another, because were ever we get traction, we'll get swamped by feminists who want men to suffer.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:12 PM
17

Not fit to be parents fullstop.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 08:39 AM
17

Oh I know. It was immediately after a user had made a veiled threat too, so I'm presuming the mod was on an alt account. It was rescinded in the end, which I expect was another mod over seeing the first. But really the proper action to take at the time was to post in mod mode as a reply to my post and say something like; "for the benefit of the sub please consider rewording your statement as it's overly general." and you know what, I'd have added a clause to it without a second thought.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:12 PM
27

Yes, but they openly espouse to being unfair and censoring dissenting views. Here we have an open policy of only banning in extreme cases, or only moderating when reddit global rules are violated.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:08 PM
65

A mod banned me for sexism the other day, then changed their mind and made it for generalization. I think there is a feminist imposter on the mod team, it's obviously not a consistant moderation policy. The mod team need to do something about this, the users can do nothing.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:06 PM
1

Smith can throw a punch, I assume it was all acting, or improv. These people know the game they're playing, they're not going to make a crime of a slap on TV, they're both going to try to make MONEY from it though.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 05:38 PM
1

Comics are not main stream political belief though, they go where the controversy is, it's their job. It's mass media for mass consumption, I assume it's ALL pretend. Will Smith is pretty canny, he knows the costs of such things if they're done for real with malice.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 05:35 PM
6

The thing is, it already is. The UK already punishes men murdering women more than men murdering men. Usually because in most cases their are aggravating factors, but still.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 02:15 PM
6

Is that what you think, I'm trying to fool you? You think I'm going to trick you out of something fundamentally important... What trick am I playing on you? I said nothing even remotely like to what you said I did; If anyone is attempting to fool someone, it's you.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:15 PM
7

I certainly didn't, but you imagine I did, which is what you think is important.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:10 PM
7

People have been saying that for almost a decade... Still here. I bet you FEEL like you should be right, I bet you think that because you feel like that the world should change to suit your feelings. I bet you think other people should alter their opinion to suit you or be made too... You know that is not how you unite the sexes, right? You're the oppressor, not the oppressed.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:08 PM
4

That's OK, as long as it very large number.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 09:01 PM
-1

Sorry but since when did anyone have human rights that weren't afforded by the society in which they live... If you check out history those people didn't have any rights for example, same people, same society, different accommodations. Natural Rights are a different thing, and I would put it to you the War in Ukraine already violates the natural rights of people, they're killing each other for example, taking each prisoner, denying each other basic accountability and record (law).
/r/MensRights22/03/22 04:18 PM
-2

The women can fight if they want too. But if they have children they have an obligation to get the child out of the war zone. If I were there I would want my loved ones safe. Also, they will conscript anyone who will fight, but they're not stupid, if someone if a pacifist they won't hand them a gun and expect them to shoot people, they hand them a medical bag or put them on transport. If someone truly doesn't want to fight there are other things they can be doing.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 11:11 AM
2

Rights are afforded you via the country in which you exist. Rights are not absolute statements of fact, they're hard won ideals. If you country falls, your rights and everything you had goes with it. I'd be pretty pissed at my country if they trapped my loved ones in a war torn country and left them to die but I have no problem staying myself and taking up arms so my family and the families of all those I know and loved get to come back to a country that affords them their hard won rights. Refug…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 10:33 AM
-5

Yes, they do. It's war, open warfare isn't about rules, there is no nice way to wage war, if you lose, you lose your country, your culture, your identity and you history. And sometimes even if you win, you lose some of those things anyway from the destruction and death. If it were the UK being invaded I'd have no problem with taking up arms, I had some training when I was younger. Some people need more of a kick in the ass to take that step.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 10:30 AM
-22

It's not a matter of morality, it's a matter of practicality. You can be for the most part those men want their loved ones to be safe and if 25% of the men leave, that leaves 25% of the women and children behind. This is war, not politics.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 09:42 PM
15

You realise that you can technically change your mind, the police have her id and they will have noted the evidence was clear. It'll probably amount to nothing, but it's the principle god damn it. Equality or death!!!
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:38 PM
3

The simple fact is that looking at someone is in no way a provocation. If she didn't want to be seen in public in that shirt she had a choice to make about going out in it that day. Personally I would have taken the charges to court. Women getting a free pass is something I won't stand for, damn it, I want equality and I'm going to get equality.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 12:37 PM
22

It is the other way around, men have no choice, if they want to live they have to work these jobs...
/r/MensRights12/03/22 06:13 PM
1

Just look at the social and health care resources women and girls get and compare to men and boys. Men and boys are dying preventable and often violent deaths, living shorter lives on average, a gap that is only getting bigger... Women and girls get sometimes double the resources that men and boys get and it shows.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:32 PM
5

It's literally online stalking at this point. It's against reddits rules to stalk across subreddits and websites... But good luck getting them to care.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 09:48 PM
2

The problem with out day is absolutely no one gives a shit to mention it. We don't get any press or attention, no one mentions our suffrage at all. We're so easily erased.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 05:46 PM
1

Oh come on, it's actually one of the genuine issues women have in the world. We have to pick our battles, this is not one of them.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:34 PM
4

Does she realize that it make no difference who's in office, they do the same thing anyway. They're all beholden to another.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 11:08 AM
-16

Absolutely correct and also, kinda pointless. This isn't a normal day, this is an extreme measure and martial law. In War no one has rights, it's MIGHT = RIGHT and that's all there is.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 10:41 AM
0

Society is a fine balance, a careful distribution of people of all kinds on all sides... In society we can live peacefully without extremes. War is a tilt of that balance far from it center that the extremes comes back and we have to live more by the laws of nature than the laws of man. I'm not against the idea that men should fight and the ones they love should flee. My own instinct is exactly that. It's not equitable or even fair is it, it's war.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 03:27 PM
0

Rape requires a guilty mind prior to the act, not after it.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 08:11 AM
3

Sadly it happened a lot when i was a kid and once when I was an adult. Women are fucking awful creatures because they're as capable of harming as men and yet live in complete denial of their responsibility not to harm others.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 12:08 AM
2

There is not premise in law for incidental touching being an offense or a tort. So no, it's not abuse. It's perfectly normal for people to touch, psychologically necessary in fact.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 12:01 AM
6

I can't take any feminist seriously anymore, knowing what I know about how they come to have their 'values' it's so funny, they're all so easily duped and manipulated, if it wasn't so terrible it'd be hilarious.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 05:59 PM
-9

They won't ever be safe without a country. No ones would.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 06:15 PM
-29

No, it's not. I'm all for equal rights, but if it comes down to being invaded by Russia and having to default too; what would you do if you knew you were already dead? If your land was going to be taken... Personally I'd send anyone away who I loved and go fight.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 05:13 PM
1

Mum is not going to stop, this will get worst and it will never get better until dad stands up for kid.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 02:56 PM
5

Sounds like child abuse. I hate the system, it's backwards. I'm a single parent dad, mum had to literally have all her kids snatched by the police in the night, and I still had to fight to get custody and not care for him. It's fucking shit, and what's worst is it's only getting worst, not better.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 08:50 AM
11

No, you'd still want to hire value and shed waste and you wouldn't care at all about the gender of your employees. Which would result in the most effective work force regardless. And hiring isn't cheap, you actually have a limited budget, you can't just hope to find a diamond in the coal mine, you're going to waste lots of budget trying to make the workplace 50/50 and then, maybe, you won't be able to run your business.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 01:11 PM
25

No, it doesn't. Because it's not half the hiring pool. You're gendering this, you're making men vs women, when it's actually value vs waste. If business could make more money hiring only women, they would do so, it's business we're talking about here, money is the only concern.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 12:19 PM
24

Those aren't biases, those are real value driven things that actually effect the companies bottom line. If a business could make more money employing women why on earth wouldn't they?
/r/MensRights16/02/22 12:04 PM
5

We die earlier so we basically fund women's pensions too. Men should get a pension discount.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 04:22 AM
1

Get your shit and leave?
/r/MensRights07/02/22 07:25 PM
7

They know it's a lie, but it's also their means to take more for themselves and they like that.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 08:42 AM
-2

Welcome to the club. Women everywhere are driven mad by the idea of actual equality...
/r/MensRights03/02/22 06:30 PM
3

r/legaladvice Seriously you need a lawyer not a advocate.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 01:13 PM
3

No, women will accuse just about anyone for anything if they feel like it's valid. Even if the man had an alibi and multiple witnesses putting them somewhere else, feelings is all women need.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 06:04 PM
4

Migs are awesome jets, I really like the older ones. They have more character than the western jets.
/r/MensRights15/01/22 06:01 PM
1

I mean I know a Prince who's going to end up on the wrong side of the dock soon enough... crosses fingers
/r/MensRights12/01/22 09:00 PM
3

That's so the wife/gf can pick up something they want to see their so in... Not for men to go and peruse.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 06:29 PM
2

Billions of years of evolution, every single successful branch depending on breeding a LOT more than the unsuccessful ones. Breeding being one of the primary functions of life, all life, of every kind reproduces or it goes extinct. Practically every species, almost no exceptions. Do you have control over fight or flight? Can you control your urge to breath? Your reflex's if you touch something hot... Sorry, but we're basically all animals, males and females, and sure we have created a civilizati…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 04:45 PM
19

It's self correcting. When they lose massive investments, make movies no one wants to watch and ruin careers of good actors for bad reasons... When they have done that, and when they have little left to rebuild with, they will see the error of their ways...
/r/MensRights12/01/22 03:39 PM
2

We are by definition animals, specifically we're mammals. Did you not study any biology?
/r/MensRights12/01/22 03:15 PM
1

We honestly don't know because they appear to be color blind when it comes to some crimes.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 01:35 PM
30

It's the UK you can be arrested simply to aid in investigating a crime... We don't have PR here, arrest is a function of the investigation.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 01:35 PM
12

They were brain washed by other women... The industry is something new, the actual behavior comes from tens of thousands of years of needing to attract men to survive. Now they dress up and make up to compete for social points with other women... And they complain that when they dress like they want to mate and send visual and sensory signals like they want to mate, in simple terms, that men think they want to mate. It's disgusting, it should be phased out, girls should not grow up like that, it…
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:49 AM
14

Walk down the high street and see the shops, if it's not general goods, it's women's clothes, makeup and fashion. Practically every other shop caters to women's standards... It also means they have collectively got a lot of money or these shops would go out of business with that much competition.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:34 AM
4

There is usually a corn of truth embedded in the filthiest shit though trying to find it means you get covered in shit.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:28 AM
12

She thinks seeing a man cry should turn her on? What has the world come too when men exist to arouse women.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:28 AM
7

Women are speshul, they never grow up, they're always children.
/r/MensRights10/01/22 11:22 AM
1

It's entertainment... And for some reason sometimes the stupid ideas seem to be workable for some people. Though I doubt they get better results than rolling a die.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 08:43 PM
8

I find it amusing. Since when where people not against men having equal consideration in health education and law?
/r/MensRights05/01/22 10:57 AM
3

Yet, there hasn't be a draft since 1972 YET...
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:28 PM
8

So why then have a Draft at all?
/r/MensRights30/12/21 09:31 PM
9

Teach women not to have sex with people and change their minds after. Drink and drugs do no negate apparent or actual consent if you do it to yourself, that's your problem.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 08:43 PM
1

I dunno man. It didn't help, but men have been hounds for time eternal. There is no fault in admitting that we're biologically pre-determined to want to spread our seed. It often amazes me that we have come as far as we have from biological origins. Women seem to forget than males of the human species are the Apex Predator ever to exist, we conquered everything nature threw at us and we planned to keep doing that until we conquered everything... This fucking gap between earth and space just dela…
/r/MensRights29/12/21 02:24 AM
31

Weremen and wohmen... Old English terms for the genders. Men is the term for all people, always has been. Weremen was shortened to men but it's not true that every instance of men refers to males (or those that identify with/as). Sometimes it's about all human beings. Women can be fishermen, mankind doesn't refer to male kind, but all people... It's completely about changing the narrative, and it's gone so far it's over reached. But it doesn't know the origin of the words so it doesn't realize i…
/r/MensRights29/12/21 01:11 AM
1

Civil Rights movement has shaped the progress of laws all over the world for two hundred years. Like I said, business and employment law prevent you from creating a sex exclusionary space except under questionable circumstances, and that goes practically 1/3rd of the world. A group of guys hanging out isn't an organized structure, no one cares about that unless it falls into a group of guys hanging out planning to bomb the local mosque or something. But history tells us that if you wait long eno…
/r/MensRights29/12/21 12:24 AM
14

Yes to all three. I really don't have time for a partner and I can not imagine one would be worth the trouble to find, assuming I'd ever find one that would put up with me, which I doubt because I'm fucking off the scale weird.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 11:47 PM
1

There is a right to not be excluded on the basis of protected characteristics. I don't see how you can deny that. It's called the civil rights movement and it's shaped the whole world for two hundred years. People are governed, society is ruled. This has been true since before the Ancient Greeks, all the theory and all the writing has been moving that way for two thousand years or more. That is not communism, communism didn't allow freedom, it ruled everyone... Americans have no idea what commun…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 11:20 PM
1

It's not your concern, it's societies concern though, hence why we collectively make laws to address our concerns. Exclusionary groups by definition infringe on someone else's freedom. You can do this in private, to some extent. But as soon as you co-opt social structures like making business you have no choice but to follow the rules of society. Fascists always intended to isolate and remove the groups who didn't agree with them, that they did is piecemeal and not all at once is just because it…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 06:06 PM
1

Legal matters matter when it comes to registered businesses and employment laws... What if the group of men only invite other men over who're also wearing white sheets and hats? Can they have a place of business just for them? Does that sounds like a long term sustainable society, or is it a breeding ground for dangerous things. I believe you're talking about the background to private association. Which I'm not against generally. But this is about PUBLIC association, which is about laws and rule…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 05:29 PM
2

At this point in my life I've stopped caring about it. I'm more of an observer than a participant. I barely had any control over the outcome anyway, so why should I let it bother me. Humanity is flawed and we should be taught from a young age to accept that and learn to live with it. But of course the system we have built, that has been built for us, is hell bent on making sure we never escape.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 05:05 PM
1

I'm an anarchist, I was talking to some liberal people about how the president is just a figure head to convince the people they have some control and perpetuate the system. I got told to go to r/conservative. People are trained and conditioned to create clusters of in and out... If they're busy fighting one another they won't fight for the freedom they actually deserve.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 04:53 PM
1

Yes, generally they should. But if they're making choices based on protected characteristics then no, at that point, they should not. The problem isn't people making a choice, it's why they make the choice and how it reflects on all the other people. Diversity is a universal solution, letting segregated places pop up as breeding grounds is a universal problem... That said, I'm all for safe spaces. But for everyone, not just for a few people.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 04:37 PM
6

They have been trained and conditioned to see the world polarized, feminism teaches them things and they feel it must be true. It's sad really, the help they actually need to learn to handle the realities of the universe and life are in men in abundance, but they would reject it to their dying breath.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 12:06 AM
2

I can assure from experience that this is not entirely true all the time. Though I assume from a lot of what I hear that my stoical fastidious nature is actually highly resistant to this sort of shit.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 12:04 AM
3

The criminal Justice is not fit for purpose and it masquerades as something useful to society because if people knew what was actually happening they would replace it in it's entirety with something fit for purpose. Mass media is also incredibly contrived and can barely be trusted to faithfully report what is happening. Reports of people having their rights abated and being railroaded in to jail isn't new... It's been happening for a very long time, it was actually the purpose of the system for …
/r/MensRights27/12/21 11:31 PM
2

Almost certainly wouldn't have any impact on a he said she said situation. Could actually be played as premeditation, who does that without nefarious intent. What could they have been planning, etc.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:28 PM
2

Be glad for the friends that looked for proof, or not, before deciding, because you can be sure once they had made up their minds they informed everyone else of their findings....
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:26 PM
3

Be glad for the friends that looked for proof, or not, before deciding, because you can be sure once they had made up their minds they informed everyone else of their findings....
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:26 PM
7

Believe no one, wait for evidence.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 10:25 PM
8

Segregation is what we need if we want equality of the sexes! YEAAAAAAAAHHHHH.... Oh wait, I'm 70 years late and it was races not sexes. Anyone see my point?
/r/MensRights27/12/21 09:27 PM
8

You have already lost, they have no faith, only dogma and rhetoric.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 07:17 PM
2

This is what has been happening since time began, what started out a sound biological imperative has become a noose around mens necks.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 07:15 PM
7

You have to use distasteful language to accurately describe a distasteful thing.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 07:14 PM
12

I'm all for accepting a person lived experiences, how they experiences is unique to them what traumatizes them is unique to them. But I'm not going to assign limited real assets, money and resources, to a feeling. If their is not a quantifiable and statistically relevant cluster of cause and effect then the solution is to send the people to therapy. And the reason men live with violence easier is actually simple. One, we suffer it more often and more greatly and two, there is sweet fuck all we c…
/r/MensRights27/12/21 07:11 PM
1

You should change the posters... Stop Violence against Women and Children. You should make some new posters and put them up yourself. Don't be hostile or accusatory, just get a message out everyone will get behind. You can't stop it, but you can start the process of inclusion.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 11:54 PM
8

Feminism is barely starting. Mens Rights is decades behind in an all together hostile environment of feminism...
/r/MensRights26/12/21 11:32 PM
2

Claire still has a penis and it looks they went trans to prevent from being placed in a mens prison, because they won't like it there. Which is a ploy a number of men who can be women have played in the UK over the years.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 09:15 AM
1

People commit violence on other people, because it's people doing it to other people we should not think about or acknowledge it, they should be left to suffer. Take it from a man who's thought about this, no picks a gender, or a sex, or a sexuality, they're born in to it, their lives shape them in ways they can never control, they're grown in to it... Violence is a universal problem, effects everyone, some more than others. We should focus resources on the area most effected by it, because that…
/r/MensRights22/12/21 07:11 PM
2

Problem is this; one sperm is all it takes, it can be crippled, it can swim in circles for days, it can even have mutant DNA, but just one of millions is all it takes... Actually stopping all production is hard as fuck, even a dead person makes sperm for a while after death.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 09:19 PM
1

I think the number was 3-5, depending on other factors. But yea, technically correct, best kind of correct.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:05 PM
1

TwoX will ban you. Feminism will ban you...
/r/MensRights20/12/21 05:21 PM
4

Violence is 5 times more likely to happen to men and boys than women and girls... So I'm confused as to why 1/5th of the violence causes so much paranoia in women and girls when men and boys just get on with it in most cases... I think perhaps there is something important I'm not understanding.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 02:33 PM
368

Women and girls are taking their queues from fiction now?
/r/MensRights19/12/21 09:04 PM
19

Act now, because the worst outcome from this is prison time for a false accusation.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 08:12 PM
0

Sex? What is that?
/r/MensRights15/12/21 10:57 PM
1

You don't have to do it, but you do have to live in a world were other people are free to do it. Also, Islam has changed a lot over the years, those rules were not always as strict as they're not, which means they can change if enough Muslims want them too.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:22 PM
2

I did Judo when I was young, I was a larger lad and the only other person there was a girl who larger than me. I got my ass kicked repeatedly, over and over again. Women and girls are not weak. But yea, if some of these fighter go in to the ring all hyped up to win, some of them are going to have a bad time when they lose. That's life man, sucks to be them, should have trained harder.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:09 PM
1

It'll be normalized during training, they won't have these gendered problems by the time they meet in the ring. They're not there to hurt one another, it's a display of skill and technique with rules and a ref.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 07:02 PM
1

It's sport, not violence. These people train to fight, they will train routinely with and on the opposite gender. The things you're talking about won't factor in to the fight.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 06:58 PM
-1

The sexes competing under a standardized set of rules doesn't bother me in the slightest. MMA is about multi skill fighting, not all of which is about power, a lot of it is about dexterity and importantly, all of it about is about thinking. I think if we had them fight no holds barred the outcome would be almost 100% predictable. But to fight within the rules with a ref, I can see women surprising everyone.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 06:51 PM
3

Not scared in the slightest, not stupid enough to do it. The premise is hilarious to me.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 02:08 PM
3

Not all that rare I'm afraid. And becoming less rare as time goes on. If a strategy works then people will use it more.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 10:02 AM
0

No it shouldn't, unless the person doing the assault is getting some sexual gratification from it it's not sexual assault. Just an aggravated offense.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 09:25 PM
2

People do evil thing to other people, so because people do it to people we should just people suffer under people.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 08:45 PM
4

Weaponized allegations are surprisingly normalized. Having seen them happen and been on the receiving end I can say with certainty that women do not care at all about other women doing it. Even when they know it's happened they won't speak against it. There is no way to defend and even trying to just makes other people try to make it worst for you. The accusation alone is so polarizing that people are struck dumb and deny the evidence of their eyes and ears.
/r/MensRights13/12/21 02:59 PM
22

It already is. This is an attempt to change the gender balance.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 09:52 PM
10

Well this is one way to be certain you end up on your ass.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 06:20 PM
10

I feel like there could be a multi discipline team who go from school to school and tell the kids what the statistics actually say about who does what to whom and importantly, what can be done about it when it's noticed, and if it's you, how to avoid following through and get help.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 09:08 PM
33

No, they're not. It's hard to detect something you never look for... The problem is no one is looking for the indicators and signs, no one is building a model to identify suicidal males. It's all for females.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 04:18 PM
1

It's a zero sum game, when money is spent on women and girls it isn't spent on men and boys. And that has had a significant impact in every measurable category for decades. Life span, quality of life, education, health and social care, care for homeless, outcomes of the Justice system, prison rates and absence of rehabilitation... It just keeps on happening with no end in sight.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 05:27 PM
2

Masturbation games between friends?
/r/MensRights02/12/21 07:00 PM
18

There is a significant problem here; Women use emotional and psychological violence with routine. Words can be violent. It is important that we mention this, because otherwise women will imagine they're free from the curse of violence.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 05:56 PM
3

Children deserve the support of their parents, the state should not have to foot the bill for children unless it was non consensual.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 08:27 PM
6

A guilty plea, with remorse, and genuine regret can negate the need for any punitive action. I had sex several times, while underage and with underage people. It's incredibly normal for most people, yet technically illegal still.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 05:26 PM
12

If you do t want to mate don't send signals like you want to mate. Its not that complex.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 03:51 PM
3

Its cyber stalking.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 03:39 PM
1

Because they think stalking is OK.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 03:04 PM
0

I don't see any evidence that that sub is trying to infiltrate schools, etc. I think if they were the plan should still be to let them hang themselves, just give them rope and wait, it's inevitable, a lot of the participants are unstable to say the least. Also, you have to remember; A lot of the work people put in to this sort of thing is a psy op, they're literally pretending and faking to get other people to go and do things for them.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 09:53 AM
2

Share this with someone in authority at the school and then just stay away and make it known to your 'group' that you're staying away from them because they're trying to hurt you.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 09:51 AM
0

Eventually they will start to do things to get attention that break the rules. But in the mean time, we better not break the rules and give them what they want.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 09:49 AM
1

Best to just not care, there isn't anything we can do about it.
/r/MensRights16/11/21 08:32 AM
9

Men are just bad, no need for a reason, but whatever reason you come up with, it's totally right and men are totally just bad - Feminists.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 04:25 PM
2

Collective punishment is a war crime?
/r/MensRights12/11/21 07:21 AM
3

Document and report, over and over again. As many times as it takes, parents and head, everytime. These girls are incredibly stupid, and actually put them selves at risk of being raped and no one believing them because they lied about it so many times before.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 04:42 PM
2

Feeling safe is not being safe... I feel safe most places I go, I feel safe even when I know I'm not safe, I felt safe when I was getting my head stomped on by a gang of young thugs... Feeling safe is not being safe.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 10:14 AM
1

While social change isn't a zero sum game, the actual societal resources are limited, and will run out. Because of that feminism is desperate to get and keep as many resources as it can. That means that they must stop men from having any resources, and to do that they have to gimp social change for men too. It's a terrible situation in which the only way to win is to actually give up fighting and unite. But of course feminism is gynocentric and will never ally with anyone... Feminism is the prob…
/r/MensRights03/11/21 10:37 AM
1

Find new friends, these people are assholes and they won't stop being assholes, for you or anyone else.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 08:38 AM
0

You can lead a racist to facts but you can't make him learn.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 03:11 PM
16

There is not practical way to know. No one is documenting it, and efforts to do are hindered by feminist policy and propaganda. I can say from personal experience that women and girls have no concern what so ever and will make allegations based on nothing more than feelings and fantasy
/r/MensRights31/10/21 10:48 PM
0

You clearly don't understand the generational deficits that come with hundreds of years of racism.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 01:06 PM
2

You have to consider the generational effects racism has had on Blacks. It's hundreds of years, nearly every generation, and it still goes on today too. It's not over, it's still happening. The reason their is anyone in poverty is because the wealthy and powerful want more wealth and power. The only real fight is the Class fight, all other fights pale to it. But denying racism is just perpetuating the problem of unity.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 10:16 PM
1

I suggest you ask some of those Black folk you know, who no doubt know how bad it has gotten, to tell you some stories about the ambitious, motivated people who didn't make it. The playing field is not level, you can't possibly deny that. A few exceptional people, who're just as exceptional as they're lucky, doesn't make it right. Tokens don't change the reality faced by millions.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 09:07 PM
0

If you walk enough people across a minefield, some will make it unscathed, that means nothing though because the rest are dead or dying... Token people don't take away systematic oppression, or make it right after hundreds of years.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 08:50 PM
0

I can't lead the blind to see. Go read, start about 100 years before America, work your way forward from there... It's all written down.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 08:49 PM
2

Racism is rising because of inequality between the haves and the have nots. And the haves have convinced the have nots that somehow the poorest of the have nots have taken something from them..
/r/MensRights30/10/21 05:55 PM
-5

Anyone who's studied American History knows where she is coming from. Blacks were denied rights and basic privileges for so long that they're a class of people that can never catch up. They will constantly be behind, and be used and abused because of that. Until they catch up there can be no equality and you certainly can't claim to support equality unless you're willing to actually give up the benefits that come with the systematic oppression of the blacks and other minorities. It's not a level…
/r/MensRights30/10/21 05:53 PM
0

Basically because it's customary. It does have a psychological purpose, and basic is about finding out who would cut it in the military, but that's no reason to treat men and women exactly the same, they're different and come with different useful qualities.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 05:12 PM
1

It's not so much the anti men that bothers, men have always shown an inate capability to deal with hardships. It's the anti boy that bothers me, early education and social opportunities really make or break an grown up... It seems like people want more broken men so they can point and say, it's mens fault.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 04:57 PM
8

Pay back for what, being brought into the greatest civilization ever to exist in human history? It's literally built on the lives and blood of men, and continues to be.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 02:40 PM
0

No. Feminism is its own worst enemy.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 04:53 PM
2

Because women like to be right. In reality however no one picks their gender or sex, having a Y chromosome is assigned to you, or not. A single person is entitled to be protected no matter what they have in common with the perpetrator, no matter what assigned details they got at birth.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 07:22 AM
1

It's not degrading to the individual so long as they're not under duress, but unfortunately a lot of people who do porn are at least under financial duress, they have to do it or they can't eat. As for women as a group, so long as some women are prudes they don't want men seeing other women's bodies, or what they have is diminished in value.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 06:22 PM
11

If you have spent anytime here you know for certain that actually that's not a fact, under reporting is even worst for men and boys and being taken seriously is made much harder when feminists like yourself push the narrative that male victims either don't exist or are actually perpetrators trying to hide as victim.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 06:13 PM
34

They don't want to be equal to men at all. No one in their right mind would want that. Men are the most down trodden shat on class ever to exist, we do all the shit jobs, for less reward and we die at an ever increasing rate, losing our pensions because we don't live long enough to enjoy them...
/r/MensRights10/10/21 03:08 PM
-5

Do away with the bricks all together and just 3d print three storey houses out of concrete. One guy can set it up and it can print 1 hours every 3 days... Of course you still need to put the frame in and floors and such. But it's a thing that exists.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 03:07 PM
8

Just means they could not connive a way to not prosecute, so they instead connived a way to make her sentence basically the same for her as not being prosecuted.... It's not Justice, and without Justice we get vigilantism...
/r/MensRights07/10/21 08:18 PM
9

They have the ear and resource because their efforts are exclusively aimed at getting control of those things and keeping control. In keeping control they actively, not passively, attack any attempt to appropriate those things for any purpose other than their own. That is an MRA issue, feminism is counter productive to the sort of equality men and boys want and need. We have no choice but to go on the offensive, otherwise we have zero chances of ever getting our issues heard, none the less dealt…
/r/MensRights07/10/21 03:47 PM
51

Nope, because feminism is one of the issues. It's a zero sum game, as long as feminism has the resources of society, and the ear of the media, they won't give it up. And they have to give it up to make it equal. So no, feminism is using more than it's fair share and has to hand some over.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 11:18 AM
1

You can't... She has no consequences, stupid people are allowed to be stupid, you can't fix them and it's annoying when they're family because you have to make excuses for them to everyone else...
/r/MensRights06/10/21 05:11 PM
5

He was being trans inclusive guys come on. giggles No, he was speaking before he had thought, not that I imagine much goes on in there.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 05:09 PM
2

The only struggle is the class struggle. In fighting is just a distraction, racism and sexism are a means to perpetuate an lengthen the struggle. We are never meant to meet in the middle, just constantly fight one another.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 05:17 PM
2

Physical communication is an important part of being a man. Giving and taking a punch is normal behavior as far as I'm concerned. Women should join in, it's liberating.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 08:16 AM
5

Feminists write both articles, what do you expect?
/r/MensRights27/09/21 09:56 AM
2

No, it's not. But to understand why women fear men you have to realize that they have been conditioned to see every little thing we do as if it was murderous intent. Every look, every word, every gesture, as if it's about them and toward them, and will result in violence. They have been told they're suffering violence at an epic rate, and every little example of it is blown-out of proportion. While the violence men suffer is barely heard off, despite being many times more than women. Also, women…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 02:14 PM
5

Biology not psychology... It's the reason for, not the justification for. Why would a species need a justification for it biological imperatives playing out as they were evolved to do so?
/r/MensRights25/09/21 06:03 PM
6

You may not believe it, but there actually is, in most mammals, a drive to mate that is overwhelming. Why would humans be different? In some ape species the males will kill the young of female so they go back into mating. If they will murder to get laid, I'm pretty sure they will do all the inbetween things too.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 05:11 PM
58

The problem is no one is accepting the massive changes that go on in teen boys heads and bodies when they hit puberty. No one is educating them as to what to do and how to react to new thoughts and feelings that come with new hormones.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 11:51 AM
5

Yea, can do. Look at the age gap, it's actually killing men, more and more as time goes on... Women just FEEL it's killing them more, they don't actually want to see data that proves 5 times more men suffer violence, or life expectancy is lower. And even when they do, they feel the explanation is not to do with systemic social problems, but basically self inflicted. But at the same time, admitting that is admitting they live healthier longer lives on average, proving the first point they made to…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 07:12 PM
4

No, nature just afforded women one more choice than men, carry to term or not, abortion has been a thing for several thousand years. The romans had a plant for this, it was so popular it's extinct now.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:43 PM
-4

I'm looking for willing volunteers.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 12:15 PM
-7

Not sure about this one. It should be an aggravated factor, which means it should increase the sentence. But if there isn't a sexual motive I don't see why it should sexual assault. For example, I have kicked a few people in the dick over my many years, if everyone was considered to be sexual assault it'd be absurd.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 11:10 AM
1

Yes, this is the sort of contrary shit the courts pull when you're too poor to have a good lawyer, not paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 09:52 PM
-1

Excuses? No, realities, yes, we live in a universe not an idea. And yes, I'm a committed Devils Advocate, but also, a committed asshole. Hence the name.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 11:21 PM
-1

Yes it does. If you can reveal something and you elect not to do so, then you enable the thing about which you complain, which is basically self inflicted, which is acquiescence.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 10:32 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights10/09/21 10:10 PM
-2

If someone has easy access to expose the fraud and does not, then the outcome is as much their own doing as anyone elses. Victim or not.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 10:06 PM
-2

You have 18 years to establish it.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 08:57 PM
0

I'll give you that. But by this point I'm objecting on the ground they waited till the child they raised and nurtured was an adult... There is such a thing as acquiescence.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 08:48 PM
3

At that point you're just be punitive against the child, you already know mom doesn't care.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 07:51 PM
2

I don't think the Police would tell the Prosecutor, because he'd have to tell the Judge or he'd be struck off of his highly lucrative career forever. They obviously know the shortlist of who did it, but the exact person, do they even care enough to find out, I doubt they do.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 12:48 PM
5

I don't think the Police told him, he'd have had to disclose that if they did. They initially didn't admit to doing it, until the defence proved it was done. Then it was an error, not a good faith effort of any kind. It was a deliberate attempt to pervert Justice, but which officer did it exactly couldn't be determined.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 08:40 AM
55

Police funding is fixed and a matter of statute. What they did here was create an overtime reward for working on the case, knowing it would go nowhere. They diverted funding to their own accounts.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:07 PM
25

Actually the Police did it, the CPS just presented it as if it were factual.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:06 PM
-2

Men have a choice when they choose to have sex or not. Nature did make males and females equal in this matter, but to disregard that is dangerous. If you don't want a baby, don't do the one thing that makes babies.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 11:14 AM
1

Want one or not, you now have one. You best realize that at some point this will dawn on you and you will want to know about your kid and see them. The reality is she holds the keys to you being in their life. If I were you I'd get your priorities sorted out now, because the choices you make today will have a knock effect and you may not be able to take them back. Also, pregnant women behave irrationally, don't take it personally.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 06:21 AM
-10

No, it wasn't and that is what is sad about it. It was originally quite a noble effort to level the playing field. Men can no more know the suffrage of women than women can know the suffrage of men. So women wanted a say, and they got it. The problem with modern feminism is now it's about stopping men having a say.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 12:07 PM
1

The answer is enough cases to indicate something very wrong is happening.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 08:26 PM
2

The opening paragraph says it all. Plenty of consensual sexual activity happens that way, but if you redefine the parameters to make it what you want you can mislead people into thinking it's not actually consensual.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 01:27 PM
-1

I don't agree. The scenario as it played out here is unlikely to attract attention of the authorities, even if the gender roles were reversed.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 02:16 PM
9

Back when I was a teen my boss went through hell, they told them he could only see his kids with his ex present, she said never going to happen. He slit his wrists after downing a lot of drink and pills. She killed him, outright to this day I have that one image stuck in my head. He worked his own business, he had a life, he had friends, but without his kids he was a goner.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 01:33 PM
7

There was a post earlier on a sub I won't mention, saying that saying you're going to kill women isn't edgy it's psychopathic. I loved the irony.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 11:17 AM
2

I'll be honest here. The legal limit for cannabis and cocaine is very low, you could be high several days before and still have an illegal amount in your system to be detected. Plus the metabolite isn't illegal in and of itself, only with the assumption that it must have only come from drug use immediately before the detection.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:17 PM
2

Haha. Very funny.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:13 PM
20

vice versa, women say kill all men. How can we know where that takes them?
/r/MensRights14/08/21 11:14 PM
22

It's incredibly invalidating to women to realize that men may disregard them as desirable, so they will retaliate with their emotionally driven narratives to stop that. Incels started out with a pretty good narrative, it was feminism and women who weaponized it against men.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 11:11 PM
9

Nah man, it makes no odds to out adversaries, they will leverage anything to get their, they will weaponize this, disgusting as it is.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 11:09 PM
11

If you measure a fish by it's ability to climb a tree then it's going to spend it's whole life thinking it's stupid.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 12:45 PM
2

Did you fail biology?
/r/MensRights12/08/21 11:14 AM
57

More like 10+ for attempted murder, how could the effort be mistaken for anything less?
/r/MensRights26/07/21 01:26 PM
8

Hahaha, oh dear, that is not the sort of type of equality I believe in and even if it was, feminists have basically done nothing for men and boys in over 50 years... So clearly there is some problem with the feminist idea of equality.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 08:02 PM
-2

I'm just annoyed that people won't send them to me! More pxx please.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 09:50 PM
5

Most men are oppressed, the issue with women is they distinguish who is doing the oppressing. That the rich and powerful elite, who're mostly men, are oppressing men is OK with feminism.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 05:31 PM
1

Then you're arguing against your own autonomy.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 07:55 PM
0

I don't like the system as it is, I try to say what I'd like to see, not what is. If you've made a fetus with a female and you didn't intend to then the circumstance of that intent aught to guide the females choices on the matter. I have never picked a partner were they didn't, and I've had two close calls in my life. It never crossed my mind I would be forced to have a child, because I was confident I had picked partners who wouldn't do that unless everything was right. You renounce the parenth…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 06:32 PM
1

Yea, that's not something I'm arguing though. The systems that exist in the west are incredibly broken and they don't exist because of women or men, they exist because the people who rule us and control us want their future children to have a great many broken people further exploit. They create systems not to benefit society, but to perpetuate and keep control of the masses. Children from broken homes make more broken homes, abstinence only sex education creates children, and broken homes. A le…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 06:11 PM
1

I don't agree with your "logic" at all. Autonomy over ones body is not the same as consequences for your person. Your money is not your body.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 05:59 PM
1

You can't force a female to carry a child to term. She has the freedom to chose, up until a point society decides, to keep the child or not. Sex is not procreation. Procreation should be something people decide to do. Yes, you do. Every single time. Even when you're sure you have done everything neccesary to not have children, shit happens. That's what the morning after pill is for, I hope you picked your partner wisely. If you made the child you have custody of it. This isn't something you can …
/r/MensRights07/07/21 05:57 PM
1

She is.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 05:48 PM
1

Look, this is biology 101. You are a gene machine, your end goal is to spread your genes. If your genes spread, you're the natural beneficiary of that. Society is not, therefore the burden of your genes being spread is naturally on you, not on society. A child formed of your genes through a natural process without the commission of a serious crime is your problem, not mine. I'm not subsidizing your genes being spread unless there is no other option, because I'm not a monster, I believe in societ…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 05:44 PM
-4

I can complain, I just find it easier to laugh at people. Complaining isn't a practically useful thing to have... Do or do not, there is no complain.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 05:32 PM
1

Sorry but you're functioning creeping on me now. Money is no a natural person exercise their choices about their body. Your right to control the fruits of your labor is complex and convoluted, deliberately. Modern people are borderline indentured servants and sometimes even, basically slaves because of circumstances. If you want my opinion on that, I frequent some anarchist subs and crypto subs. I've secured my own future and freedom by making sure I have a healthy part of my labour in a form th…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 05:24 PM
-1

No, actually I don't. I'd preach that males should be responsible for their seed. The solution for males and females is different, because out biology is different. However, if a female uses force, violence or deception to get pregnant, that's rape and I would also suggest the child is the victim, and the penalty should be severe enough to deter females from doing that. Legally once the child exists it has independent rights to have a parent, and in the case of the above, the father will be awar…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 05:07 PM
-9

No, it is. Should I have a say in your body? If you get a cancer, can I deem it necessary for your to die because I like those cells more than I like you... It's simple, people have freedom over themselves and no government should interfere except exceptionally.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 04:42 PM
2

"killing babies should be legal" - Comfortable_Ad_574
/r/MensRights07/07/21 03:07 PM
-6

It's actually simple, the person who can have the abortion should have the say and everyone else should stfu. I don't understand why it's more complex than that. The difficult bit is at what point is the fetus more important than the mother and that should be up to the doctors who's care they're in.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 03:05 PM
10

Its not unfair to say but its far from the whole picture. Women and girls are still in need of some legal reform. Abortion for example.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:12 PM
10

Looks, as soon as your realize you're scum in the eyes of most women the sooner you stop caring what women think, feel or want. They do it to themselves in the end, men are independent by our nature, women require a crowd.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 11:46 PM
1

If only men would just give it up, women wouldn't need to rape! Right? RIGHT?
/r/MensRights02/07/21 08:01 PM
1

This is the key to understanding women, their feelings are superior to any facts you can muster. If they feel it, they will change the world to suit them and damn the consequences. Which is probably why men built civilization.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 05:44 PM
10

We should just make gender pointless one day and collective change all men to women on paper. Call it an act of protest.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 05:49 PM
2

Rigging the system to get more power, money and resources for your cause... Who is it they're imitating here?
/r/MensRights01/07/21 05:45 PM
2

Nepotism and Connivance seem to rule most judicial systems now. It's not what you know, it may not even who can afford to pay, but it's who you know and how you arrange things after the fact.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 03:24 PM
6

OK, that can be done. But first you have to make some rich person richer, by giving them a cut of the pie to manage such a system. Once you proven such a system to them, they will lobby and make it happen by themselves.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 05:55 PM
10

This isn't new, a child has an expectation of support from any parental figure in their lives, not just men. It's just it's usually mother who's tricking the first man she can in to paying for the child.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 02:28 PM
3

Technically there are always more women than men.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:37 PM
13

You're surprised? It's obviously not written by men.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 01:06 PM
2

You still think it's about intelligence. Put simply these people imagine they're superior, better than everyone else, they see the masses as a under class, fated to always serve and never be served. They treat us well only if it serves them, we get scraps and think we're blessed. But in reality we're the shit on their shoes to them. You seem to almost worship them for having something you don't, not aware that took it from you piecemeal over the generations that came before, undoubtedly men and …
/r/MensRights21/06/21 10:00 AM
1

HAHAHAHAHAHA. You'd have to be pretty dumb to think you're lead by the most intelligent people, perhaps the greedy stupid don't rise to the top, but the IQ of the average toff is no better than average, the willingness to exploit people and circumstance to make themselves more powerful and rich is what gets them to the top. The money they spend on the poor people, to provide protection and security is what keeps them there. That isn't smart, look at the planet, their descendants are as doomed as…
/r/MensRights20/06/21 11:34 PM
3

If Justice is denied, retribution is necessary. Justice is good for everyone and denying it leads naturally to the worst outcome possible for everyone.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 11:30 PM
2

What makes you think any other struggle can be successful at anything but keeping us busy? I mean we're set on each other by class, by race, by religion, be gender and sex, perpetually. The only struggle is the class struggle, every other struggle is simply a distraction perpetuated by the few to keep them in power, we can never win one, that would defeat the point.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 11:26 PM
3

The only struggle is the class struggle. Everything else is a distraction.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 07:20 PM
5

Collective punishment too. Feminism has become hating on men. And what is hilariously funny, if men actually wanted to oppress women, how could they stop us?
/r/MensRights18/06/21 05:56 PM
-11

It's terrible, but I'm still going to laugh, sorry.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 07:24 PM
-1

I was comparing wwII trench warfare to modern operation based warfare. There already are female operators in militaries around the world. The role will change further as technology enhances combat. Lighter equipment from modern materials, shorter supply lines (with drones), enhanced mobility, It's all coming, eventually.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 05:09 PM
-1

In general yea. But imagine how many intermediate roles women could take up and free up men for front line combat. While still being combat effective if their base or convoy is attacked directly. I also don't doubt that some women can do it and I think we will see that in the future. Also, there are women in combat roles already. There are several roles that need women, specialized roles like in anti terror units and roles that serve along side intelligence operations, where they need to recruit…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 04:45 PM
51

Dead people can't vote mate. If you want to see the truth, see the truth. If you can vote you get more recognition than if you can't.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 04:16 PM
-12

I totally disagree. WWII was proof that we need every able bodied person to contribute in the domain they're best at. Sure that did leave a very sexist policy on the table, but you can not deny that the average man makes a better combatant than the average women in a WWII footing. What has changed is this, war is no longer about personal strength, women can be a part of a team of operators and not reduce the combat effectiveness. In fact in some cases they may be able to improve it. Morale is so…
/r/MensRights17/06/21 04:13 PM
27

Police are basically liars until proven otherwise in my eyes. I have experienced the extent to which they will just make shit up myself. In the spirit of the Polices Lawyer. An officer will saying anything in order to avoid punitive action by his employer and to save the force enough money to pay two officers for a year. So unless they have more proof than their word, I don't care what they say.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 02:41 PM
6

suspected suicide attempts There is an inherent BIAS in recognizing the female attempts and not equally recognizing the male attempts, plus, as others has said, men don't go to ER they go to the coroner.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 06:44 PM
1

I'll be honest, if you primary example of a man is this monster I'm going to go out of my way to accept your lived experience has had a profound impact on you.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:33 PM
0

Yea, so she has suffered all that time. People are easily broken by monster like this, applying your own moral code to such things is bullshit. This women was clearly in an impossible situation and seeing he was going to rape her daughter, she took action, finally. I know you think she had options, and maybe she did have them, but she also had a right to make a choice too, every victim of violence has the right to protect themselves as they see fit, and to protect others as they see fit. I would…
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:31 PM
24

The feminist movement was founded on the notion that only women could speak for women's issues, men couldn't not understand of comprehend the burden of being a women. I totally agree with that, so I don't try to speak for women. Instead I speak for what I do understand, mens issues. As such I know for certain that I've never met a feminist who helps men, I've heard of them. But in my time advocating, from college to uni, I NEVER MET ONE. I heard women say awful things about men, I saw them conni…
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:15 AM
2

At this point I'm guessing the trolls don't know how deep the rabbit has gone and are just in it for the constant recycling of old material. Left hand doesn't know what right hand is doing sort of thing. Anyway, where is the popcorn?
/r/MensRights11/06/21 05:05 AM
2

Who cares what gender of sex a person who commits wrong is? There is not trend across gender or sex lines and no one chose their gender or sex, well most people can't. If we don't chose such things, why're we to blame for them?
/r/MensRights08/06/21 10:25 PM
2

Empathy toward men by women is so low that it's no surprise men consider women the enemy now.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 03:59 PM
4

Should really be doing away with it, not expanding it. It's a terrible way to press gang people in to things they would never want to do.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 08:10 PM
16

Same shit, different day. Feminists do all those things too. One of the simplest ways to tell if it's equality is this. When feminism was born it was born out of the idea that men can not understand or imagine women's suffrage. And that's absolutely 100% correct. But consequently, Women can not understand mens suffrage either. And while I restrain myself from commenting on womens issues I wish the same was true of women commenting on mens issues. Basically as soon as a women tries to express an …
/r/MensRights30/05/21 10:54 PM
3

There is a disparaging and derogatory word in the female lexicon for everything men do. Feminism makes sure every women knows how to put men down at every turn.
/r/MensRights30/05/21 06:15 PM
7

The word Law, and the word Lore both come from the same place. Women shouldn't be making Lore about Men which harms Men.
/r/MensRights30/05/21 05:43 PM
24

What fucking help? All the money and resources are specialized in to helping women.
/r/MensRights30/05/21 05:41 PM
8

Oh yea, I've been banned from several subreddits because people have immediately replied, you use mensrights you're not a feminists go away. Technically this kind of cyber stalking is contrary to Reddits primary rules.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 02:01 PM
1

The human condition doesn't care about gender or sex or sexuality, it's out to satisfy it's own desires end of story. Women have this mistaken belief they're better because they're women, when in fact that belied assures they actually much much worst. To be vigilant of a thing first you must accept you're capable of it.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 03:25 PM
-16

Sorry but no DOXXING, even linking to articles that do it is bad.
/r/MensRights23/05/21 08:10 PM
5

Ugh, this woman is stupid and makes other people stupid just by proximity to her.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 03:49 PM
12

Women have this imagination where they think anything that doesn't flatter them is deserving of their condemnation in the strongest terms... Creep doesn't even mean creep anymore, it's just a term to refer to any man you don't want attention from.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 02:44 PM
1

Agreed, but we need to be clear, there is anti feminism, and there is ANTI FEMINISM. And I think we have to accept the first, and reject the second. Or in other words, there are some elements of all feminism that tend to effect males in ways that are wrong and are put beyond males reach to control. And just shouting about how women got something with their feminism isn't right, more power to women who overcome adversity to get ahead. But if you have to put out someone else's candle to make your …
/r/MensRights11/05/21 10:34 AM
1

CPS only get to know about thing after the police have decided to take the case to them.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 10:12 PM
5

You can't stop random unpredictable violence, it's just not feasible.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 08:41 PM
6

Women are the safest class of people that has ever existed in all of human history... I don't understand why this is not enough.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 06:42 PM
8

It's expensive because they have MORE money to spend, so the prices for the same quality of product get put up. You only have to walk down a high street to see that most of the shops cater to women. This can only happen if they're spending more money than men, and that can only happen if they have more to start with.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 04:24 PM
6

Yup, and as time goes on, it's get more and more extreme. The moderates are forced out and the extremists rule the roost. It's quite a sad state of affairs.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 12:15 PM
3

This won't stop happening until the grown up children start filing against the state for letting it happen. There tens of thousands of children in this boat, and many more in lesser situations. It'll bankrupt the state to have to deal with them.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 04:39 PM
0

No, there is no absolute truth. The court is not trying to be objective correct, it's trying to be just, the process relies on honesty, and the ability to show dishonesty through the adversarial process.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 05:12 PM
4

Truth is no an absolute though. No one expects people to know the truth, just not to lie about things is enough.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 12:21 PM
6

Yup, they stalk people across reddit and attack you for participating in this sub, it's technically against reddits rules to do this, but good luck getting reddit to care on bit.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 07:46 AM
4

Bad break up followed by threats, not an unusual situation. Probably not something to worry about. However there is really only one course of action you can take and that is to get a lawyer and take your evidence to the police. Undelete should work on the cards, but don't you do it, let them do it. It would also help if you can identify the location that she took the pictures, so the police can go interview about her taking them and having the camera at the time when the files where made.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 12:38 PM
2

Breaking it down. She could still have been raped the 11th time and just cried wolf the first. There are sympathies to that situation, the law doesn't stop protecting someone who cries wolf. And the law unfortunately, or fortunately, is a machine, once it starts it tends to follow a set course. For better or worst. As for society taking all allegations as true, that's not a criminal justice problem and the courts can't really stop protesting everyone under the law. If she got two years then she …
/r/MensRights07/04/21 09:51 PM
-17

Legally they're not allowed to lie to the court. But they have learned well from all their time with criminals... And like with anything, what was once almost exclusively a last ditch attempt to get a almost certain criminal off the streets has become a war on every case to get the maximum penalty possible.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 05:25 PM
-25

This isn't exclusively a women and girls problem. It's universal... If you want to see the best liars just watch the cops.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 05:18 PM
72

I dunno, the courts tend to not like it when it can be confirmed they were used maliciously. They all know that they're not 100%, but something like this will irk enough lawyers and clerks to make them work extra hard.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 05:17 PM
38

Watching people starve to death isn't a good look.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 09:23 PM
4

In the UK, the actual Nazi's are basically here. Women have this problem when their appeals to emotion don't work on men, they just escalate and attack. Like when you tell them they're 1/5th as likely to suffer random violence on the street, they attack. Doesn't matter that you're right, only matters how they feel. I would not trust these women with a business, never the less country.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 04:48 PM
1

I dunno, he's a pretty nasty dude who beat the shit out of two people, and then beat on them some more... It's one thing to kill, it's another to take pleasure in doing it.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:05 PM
-3

Yes, that's the entire point... That illusion is what they're paying for. Grown ass adults know what they're getting into.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 05:29 PM
-2

Sex is and always will be a marketable product. This isn't going away. So I say bring it on. It's not free, that's the point. It's better than free because it's custom work, made just for you and everyone else who enjoys it, and with more people in the marketplace to make that work happen, the price is lower and the quality is higher... I don't see a problem.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 04:33 PM
-10

I don't understand why people think this is bad. Higher quality, lower prices... It's a win win.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 03:49 PM
-102

I told one of my ex's and they stopped, and I honestly didn't notice... They had to ask me. I was just nom nom nom...
/r/MensRights29/03/21 03:39 PM
92

Everything a man wants makes them a paedo... Didn't you get the memo?
/r/MensRights29/03/21 03:38 PM
2

I dunno if I can believe a blackout drunk person can be that audible... I mean I don't doubt she said something, but if it was audible is in question, no? If the person you're having sex with didn't consent, then it's rape. All other things being equal sleep sex is a valid fetish... So not at all in all cases. You have to remember consent takes in to account the massively variable desires of all the horny people who've come and gone on earth. One person may say something arbitrary like you have,…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 03:34 PM
5

There is other law that makes sex without consent rape even if your pissed.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 11:21 AM
11

It's hard to say really, did she consent then fall to sleep and forget because she WAS so intoxicated that she couldn't stay awake. That is going to have some effect on memory as well. In this case I don't see how they could prove is beyond all doubt.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 11:21 AM
16

Rapist = someone who is convicted, not someone who is accused. As far as I can tell they still need consent or it's rape. Alcohol and drugs fuel half the sex in the world. Feminism is trying to stop people having consensual sex because it doesn't like people have sex... All sex is rape, etc. It's bogus and it always has been.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 11:19 AM
29

The ruling just negate this technicality in this case, it's does stop rape in all it's other forms from happening. If you're voluntarily intoxicated and you didn't consent that's still rape. Though remember, forgetting you consented is your problem too.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 11:16 AM
43

Actually this ruling means that you can consent while voluntarily intoxicated, which we knew all along. It doesn't mean you can't be raped.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 11:15 AM
7

Yes, feminism has a culture of making everything in to rape... It's a real problem.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 09:35 PM
5

They don't want allies, they want servants.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 06:11 PM
5

We're kept divided by design, feminism is one of the major ways the people who're downtrodden are kept divided, gender politics can only get worse. Don't be sorry though, you didn't do anything wrong.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 06:07 PM
11

Like the Swedish who called in gay to work.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 04:52 PM
6

Many times this has come up in conversation, from college to my 40's. Women have very unreasonable expectations, feminism tells them they have some sort of right over men because of how they allow themselves to feel.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 04:49 PM
5

Next they will be asking men to wear arm bands to indicate they're allies and not a threat, or some such. Women don't seem to think they seem to feel, and it's a dangerous path to tread for men to act on feelings.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 04:47 PM
1

You won't change the system from within... Sorry. I've had talks with several lawyers, they're all fucked and they know it. They have to follow the status quo or they will be professional crucified and pushed out of the industry.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 10:30 PM
2

A patriarchy in name alone! When you look at what men and boys go through it's not a patriarchy at all. It's a psycoarchy, the men at the top, who by their very nature get there, step on everyone on the way up and kick at everyone to keep anyone else from climbing... While we're set against each other to keep us from realizing the truth. Men against women, girls against boys, black on white, class on class... If we only stopped fighting each other we would see who the real enemy is.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 02:31 PM
0

Once upon a time, I did.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 10:32 PM
-5

Have some compassion... Assume that people are genuine until there evidence to the contrary. And sexism as a word, you're right. But sexism isn't a single event, it's a course of conduct.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:59 AM
1

It's not though. Violence is happening, murder and rape are happening. Sure those thing are happening to men too, and sure it's a gross generalization, but it's a very real emotional state caused by very real things. To my mind, and perhaps to most men, it's a massive overreaction, and it's hard to relate too as men. But maybe we don't' need to relate it to our own experiences in order to accept it's happening. In some ways I think women have some sort of meme based mental illness, it's contagio…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:00 AM
10

So, been speaking to some of the women I know, trying to understand this reaction some more. Women and girls learn this fear from the related experiences of other women and girls. It's a real fear, a genuine emotion, that once they learn about it they carry with them and it gets triggered by darkness, being alone and being near men they don't know. I'm remembering a little bit about my childhood since my son is 8 and he's been talking about he is scared of the dark and scared of the monster in t…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:30 PM
-2

Retaliatory violence is wrong, we should not retaliate with violence. I am not allowed by agreement with the mods to say anything else on this matter.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 09:28 PM
6

It's not impossible, it's just manipulated, by watering down the definition to mean anything they like they can say anything they like. What's important is that by the same notion we can honestly say that yes, 97% of men have been too, what of it.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 09:26 PM
3

Lawyer up and don't say anything to anyone about this at all. Don't deny it, don't confirm it, don't discuss it at all. Don't waste money on a PI, you can't recover anything from the woman, you may never even see a record of her complaint. You're going after your employer for not following employment law, you will probably settle, unless they did something significantly wrong. You need a number in your heard for when you see the lawyer, that number will determine how hard they will work, if at a…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 09:24 PM
5

Basically no. I hear that from women making claims about what men say, but I never hear men say it. That's not say it can't be said, I've seen people provoke things before. It happens.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 09:17 PM
9

Actually I just had a though. Tell your GF to tell her that you broke up and she wants to get back at you, to push for something drastic, tell her to buy in to it all and see just how far down the rabbit hole this woman goes. Tell her she needs to know how dangerous this person actually is.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 08:58 PM
31

Sorry. But my advise is simple, cut your losses. These people are not to be toyed with, they're dangerous women and they will stop at nothing to control other women.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 08:56 PM
1

TR is just a careful idiot because he has been sued and prosecuted for the things he has done. He isn't genuine when he says those things....
/r/MensRights13/03/21 08:52 PM
5

I can not fault the logic. You're saying the same thing many men are saying. Some have more trouble getting the ideas out, but it's much the same thing from most of the men I know. The 97% is harassment, not assault. Though many fem friendly publications have switch the words up for effect. As the base definition of harassment is unwanted attention, it's kind of weak to use it like that. So they substituted assault for harassment, which is much more impactful, but outright false.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 08:49 PM
108

Ha, I'm done with getting laid. It's not worth the trouble at all. I have a son, I'm a single dad, mum is distant and unmotivated and I know what I have to do. Raise the boy, live the life of a pirate, take what I can, give nothing back. YARGH!
/r/MensRights13/03/21 08:38 PM
4

All I know for sure is that women can be evil and I can not know which women that is so from now on it's all women.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 08:36 PM
10

Feminsts think that anything that isn't on their side and singing in chorus is against them and therefore the enemy. Because they think they're better than men, superior perhaps. All I know for sure is that women do evil things to men and I can not possibly know which women will do these evils so I'm just going to treat all women that way until further notice.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 08:30 PM
7

The biggest problem is the lack of any accountable or culpability for the one trying to pervert the course of justice. If we only punished them equally when they're caught people would be far less likely to try it on.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 07:44 PM
8

I'm here because I care. Men do care, it's just our nature determines how we care. And we're content to let each man have his own hardship and learn his own lessons... Feminism has taken up all the space for gender issues and refuses to relinquish any. Men are just not loud enough or amplified enough to get the message out. And women only hear the loudest messages, so they deny men even have a problem in the first place. There is only so much time in government, so much money in the coffers, so …
/r/MensRights13/03/21 07:30 PM
6

Frankly I find myself further and further alienated from the plight of women and girls. I don't like it, but enough of them say such awful vile things that I have to assume all women are bad and avoid them where I can... There is no other possible way to know if they're good, so it's ALL WOMEN from now on.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 07:15 PM
26

The very premise of the sufferagettes was that men with the vote couldn't be trusted, or even be capable, of representing womens issues because they literally had very little to zero experience with being a women. But now we are expected to believe the opposite it true, that women with no experience of mens issues can not only identify the real issues mens face but can direct the resource of society to help men. It's unbelievable. Even if they're sincere, the fundamental point the suffragettes m…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 06:15 PM
1

Where would they put us all. There are nearly 30 Million men in the UK. With maybe 20k on duty cops... It's not a good luck on a cop to be hogtied in the street, right?
/r/MensRights12/03/21 11:31 PM
2

You must take into account that men don't reconcile the same meaning and it's self reported in most cases. Personally I know plenty of men who've suffered sexual assault and never even bat an eyelid about it. Men just don't experience the trauma women do for basically the same thing happening.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 11:29 PM
1

Depends on how flexible you are going to be with the definition of sexual assault... Sure, women perpertrate such things differently, but it's still the same basic thing. I think perhaps men are just more resistant to adversity by nature and so don't live with trauma the same women do. Which explains why we record more male on female events than we do female on male. Men are just not reporting it. In my lifetime I've met plenty of men and women who have suffered sexual assault.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 11:26 PM
1

My money on road traffic accident and panic'd cop. It'll turn it was as unlucky as rolling a dice and has nothing to do with her being a women. Had she lent down to tie her shoe while walking over the common some other sods, from further down the same road, body would be in the woods getting burned... I'll put money on it not actually being a murder.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 11:24 PM
2

Don't get me wrong here. I recognize the value of ritual behavior. Bringing people together is a very useful thing, as long as they know it is. Remind me of my time considering being a mason. Being asked to chant a mantra and agree to believe in a higher power. It's a con job and so is feminism. Feminism doesn't want women to feel safe, even if they're safe than literally every other class, fear and dogma and rhetoric keep them in a perpetual state of fear and therefore easily controlled.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 11:16 PM
2

Women want to feel safe, not be safe. No one can control their feelings but them, feelings are entirely non objective reality, they don't mean anything unless you give them meaning, but once you give them meaning they control you forever. As a man I learned two things. I can't control the world and I should not even try. I'm well aware the gang of youths could murder me for the change in my pocket and I have literally been set upon for exactly that. But I don't let my feelings control me, I cont…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 11:10 PM
1

I agree with this completely... I have had the same sort of thoughts but been unable to put them in to words that communicated it well. Feminists are suffering from a collective dillusion with ritualistic behavior. Doing the same thing over and over an expecting the outcome to change. The nest question is, how do we treat mentally ill people who don't even accept they're ill. Can we put something in their juice box?
/r/MensRights12/03/21 11:02 PM
2

Basically anything a women, exposed to feminist rhetoric, says it is. And from the understanding I have, I'd say it's pretty much the same for men, if you interpret it loosely enough, and on a long enough timeline, everyone is a sexual harasser and has been sexually harassed. This is not surprising really, is it?
/r/MensRights12/03/21 10:19 PM
2

I don't worry about the meanderings of children? I mean there is a real world out there, they will have to grow up eventually... They're not my problem.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 10:05 PM
1

Alas this is not what it's being said it is. The Bill will never be voted on. It's technically wasting the time of parliament, and could result in contempt of parliament if it's actually thrust forward as a real bill. This is really just a feel good piece of fiction... An attempt, a terrible one, to get attention for a personal cause by levering a position of trust.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 09:45 PM
4

The only thing I actually have responsibility for is #notme, everyone else can go fuck themselves. I'm not responsible or able to change the other people around in any way. No one is. Nor should we want too, we can only change how we respond to the world, not the world itself.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 09:16 PM
3

Almost exact same thing happened to me, police turned up, asked me to leave. She wasn't even on the lease, they didn't care, it was that or a cell for disturbing the peace... In my own home. I didn't even raise my voice.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 07:57 PM
1

The problem is claims to be so prevalent it would have to happen every moment of every day to and by everyone on earth without much of an exception at all. That is impossible. The degree to which a mis communication or a slight remark is treated as sexual violence, or sexual abuse, or sexual assault clouds the real true problem. It doesn't help to solve the problem of serious offenses like rape, it makes it HARDER to solve. You're suggesting then that men just incidentally do this every day to a…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 08:53 AM
1

The notion that I have to repeat your rhetoric or be branded a rapist is a joke. I am not a part of the problem, the problem is a small number of people who have a predatory nature, those peoples nature will not change through education. So educating men in a manner that changes all men is not a solution to the problem you're talking about. As for 97% of women, that's 3.5 billion people. How do you explain the objective problem of this happening in plain sight yet not being seen by the other 3.5…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 08:16 AM
17

Welcome to equality, men have been disposable for forever.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 10:47 PM
1

It's not a solution, it's a method to be happier. People can chose to control their emotions, or chose have their emotions control them. Live in the moment, don't worry about what could be. Plenty of women commit violence and sexual violence. If there is a skew it may be toward more men doing it, but it's not by as much as people are lead to believe. Is it a reasonable fear though. It's a fear, sure, but it's reasoned... The number of rapes that can be known for certain would suggest it's not re…
/r/MensRights11/03/21 10:20 PM
5

No, they're being taught to live in fear, to live every moment like they're about to be raped or violently injured. When in fact the actual incidence of that happening isn't any higher for women than it is for a man. Men suffer more or less equal violence, though it comes differently and yet we don't live every moment like we're about to be set upon by a gang of thugs or a mugger... Teaching women not to revel in their feelings will improve their quality of life immensely. They don't have to liv…
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:47 PM
-1

There will always be predators, teach women not to look and act like prey... It's that simple.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:35 PM
3

Hypocrites aren't they.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:14 PM
2

I just ignore women who can't control themselves like this, they're children in my eyes and don't deserve the respect adulthood brings.
/r/MensRights04/03/21 03:10 PM
90

Women are just as bad to men, they just don't recognize it.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 06:20 PM
-26

A well written contract can easily compel a court to do a thing, that's the point of a contract. If you can't rely on one then the whole legal system falls apart. The point I was trying to make is if she had such a contract she would be able to plan for this eventuality and therefore be able to have kids without the ex's help, but with the help of another willing participant. But because this was not a choice she had the court isn't going to take children away from her when they're already ferti…
/r/MensRights26/02/21 10:56 PM
6

An egg, lol. Well spotted.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 10:01 PM
-51

Sucks, but the problem here isn't the law, or the courts, it's the person who drafted the contract... If she had known from day one this was a possible outcome she would have prepared unfertilized embryos. And if she had done that the court would have be able to satisfy the husband, assuming the contract allowed it.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 09:24 PM
1

In all fairness the far right appeal to the baser nature of people in general, it always comes around in the end. This probably isn't changing the periodic resurgence, just what lies they grasp on to in order to try to justify it.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 08:31 PM
1

It's almost as if they think everything is about them...
/r/MensRights25/02/21 07:54 PM
8

Menslib isn't a sub for men, it's a sub for women. It's quite obvious if you spend any time reading.
/r/MensRights24/02/21 11:10 PM
6

Haha. What did you expect. Being here comes with serious risk of discrimination, that's how we know we're right.
/r/MensRights24/02/21 10:32 PM
6

Hahaha, I'm staying single and uninterested. I have what I want in life and I don't want anyone to have the power to take it off me.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 10:28 PM
0

Men are apex predators, that is undeniable, but women are not that far behind and however less physically capable of violence they are, they still seem to manage to murder plenty of men, usually while sleeping, or from behind, or with a poison, or by manipulating other men. So it's not that women are less capable of violence, they're just incredibly dishonest about their violence. Women tend to approve of this dishonesty, and celebrate it. So women revel in violence too, they just deny it and li…
/r/MensRights21/02/21 12:43 PM
2

Not actually that unusual, biology + curiosity + opportunity. For most kids that never ends in anything remotely sexual, but for some it does. I can remember being in primary school and do you, show me your I'll show you mine with the girls. I must have been nine years old. Anyone of those times could have turned in to touching, if we had not be in school.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 05:01 PM
1

White Knighting precedes feminism though. I guess he'll find out how it happened now he has the basis of a case against the state, they will have to disclose internal policy documents, etc, to explain why they did it. Those policies may very well be biased based on feminism.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 04:22 PM
1

I'm confused at how this works. She was raped, she accused her ex. She was wrong to accuse her ex, but there was a basis to believe they had grievances with one another and that it was someone who knew the home. I can understand the accusation, I can understand the arrest, I can understand the need for the police to pay it out at first, while they investigate alternatives. Like he had payed someone to do it on the one night of the year he had a perfect alibi, etc. But for the police and the stat…
/r/MensRights12/02/21 04:13 PM
0

Women are guided by how they feel not what they think, so invariably they contradict themselves. It's sort of sad, very few every really wake from the dream, they live vicariously through others feelings and experiences, never actually living at all.
/r/MensRights10/02/21 04:17 PM
19

Personally I'm going to do what my conscious dictates, but damn, I'm going to second guess myself if it's a women, and if they die because of that, I'm not responsible for that, no man is. Feminists are, because that is what they wanted, so it is what they got.
/r/MensRights30/01/21 12:33 AM
-3

Women have a much better sense of smell than men in general. And men tend to harbor more body odors and bacteria, because our sweat is thicker and generally more nutritious to them. I blame evolution.
/r/MensRights28/01/21 09:58 PM
2

Here's a phrase that may help you. Trust, but verify. No one who cares is going to hold it against you if you attempt to verify things, while still offering the trust that they would deserve. Never be afraid to make sure you know what's going on, or at least are comfortable with what you don't know.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 11:25 PM
2

I call this risk. And by consenting, knowingly or not, you accepted the risk that shit wasn't like you thought it was. I guess there is a difference between lying about it and letting someone believe it. But how that affects the law, and the outcome of a proceeding, it's impossbile to know.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 11:21 PM
0

If you consent to a bungee jump then consent is drawn as a line in the sand, if you don't jump, you didn't cross the line, so you didn't consent. If you do jump, then you can't change your mind half way down and expect that to change the outcome. More or less capacity to consent is on you. As long as you basically understand what is happening you can consent. The law today would like to give as many people capacity to consent as it reasonably can. There are even explicit rules about consenting f…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 11:17 PM
6

Risk? Though intentionally transfer an STD is probably assault in one form or another. If I wear a suit and show you my black card, and you sleep with me, but later find out I sweep streets and I'm broke, is that rape? Is sex dependant on being married? I don't get it, you're saying the women is having sex in order to entrap a mate, and by not getting to entrap this mate, it's rape? I'm not even sure how virginity would qualify in the modern world, I guess it does in some places, but that is cha…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 10:44 PM
1

This law you're talking about, it's worldwide and has been for hundreds of years. It doesn't just get used for sex, consent is a complex field of law that is implied whenever two or more people agree to a course of action that has risks. You can't just flip it on its head because you want to. Why can't people with brain injuries consent, can they never ever again engage in risks. Why can't people who have altered their state of mind either. Is your idea of consent so rigid that you would deny pe…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 10:37 PM
0

The problem with sex is it isn't mechanical. It's practically animal. People who're having sex could be considered if they're doing it right, to be in an altered state of mind. A state of mind that may not even register the word no, or stop. And as such that is the risk, that your partner won't immediately be aware of the need to stop. One of the risks anyway, coroners have recorded sex as the cause of death. If your partner is oblivious, are you being raped? If you're being raped, is there a ra…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 10:22 PM
1

This is my point, the law doesn't care how you try to change the rules, it's the law. Consent is not a contract, two people who don't speak the same language can consent, people with massive brain damage can consent. Being drunk, or intoxicated, and you can consent. Perfect strangers, meeting once for mere minutes, can consent. And in every case where there is consent, neither party can get what they want, and tough titties, that's what consent is for. If you consent to an act, that is accepting…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 10:07 PM
2

In the UK alcohol does not negate consent as long as you drank it willingly. You put yourself in an altered state of mind and so you're responsible for the outcome, absent some other parties deliberate offence if you get pissed and agree to an all grudge cage match with a ten times world champion you can't change your mind mid punch. And even if you do, the other participant isn't culpable for the outcome if that punch breaks your kneck and renders you paralyzed. Consent is there for when risks …
/r/MensRights17/01/21 09:49 PM
2

You have added a qualifying act, "keeps going to her satisifcation" which makes the act consented to not the act that is now taking place. The problem which arises from a consensual act is one the consenting parties were aware of when they consented. That is what consent, prior agreement to the circumstances the RISKS involved. If it were not for the risks, consent wouldn't mean anything at all.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 09:45 PM
4

This is exactly my point, it does not automatically become rape. That is what feminism is trying to convince you. Legally the act takes place with consent, but for consent, the act wouldn't have happened. So there is no guilty mind. There has to be some qualifying change in what was consented too for the act to become a new act altogether. The problem that arises from changing one's mind does not automatically make a crime happen or a criminal of our partner. Sure it is a problem, but if you did…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 09:42 PM
6

There have not been grey areas though. Feminism is teaching women a completely broken idea of consent that heavily favours them in case of any desire to claim something against their partner. I studied consent in law for years. It has not changed in over 250 years. It's just the area where it would apply have been expanded on. As an example, a feminist would tell you that any activity which doesn't end immediately is an injury to the women. But in law, an activity that is started with consent do…
/r/MensRights17/01/21 07:11 PM
24

Replace teach with punish. What women are saying is to punish all men until some men stop doing thing.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 06:13 PM
1

Actually it does do something. It increases the violence toward women. You imagine they do this without purpose, they need to be hated and despised to have their status assured. Last thing feminists want is to win, because on that day they lose too.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 03:50 PM
24

Women think because the psychopaths in power appear to be mostly male that this somehow benefits all males. So they collectively blame males and masculinity for their problems. The issue I have with that is most of the time more women vote than men, so they're basically the cause of their problems.
/r/MensRights04/01/21 04:36 PM
5

While I don't' agree with abuse victims being overly punished when they have options, this woman was trusted enough to tie up her husband, which isn't something an abuser commonly does. So I am doubting her story quite a bit. Abusers don't surrender power to the people they abuse, it's contrary to their very nature.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 06:28 PM
2

She was as Evil as they come without actually enacting 100 years of tyranny and mass round ups. Though there was a lot of tyranny and she did round up several groups of people using the machine of the state. Basically, no good she did was done for the sake of it being good.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 07:37 PM
5

Thatcher was the mouthpiece for evil, that she did a little necessary good is not a reason to celebrate her. Anyone who had power at that time would have done the same good she did, but probably wouldn't have destroyed the entire country to do it.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 07:27 PM
5

Fuck feminism frankly, it's a pox on society and a blight on the world.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 02:51 PM
27

Kinda sad for the people who have no money. :(
/r/MensRights21/12/20 08:27 PM
1

Big Flop incoming.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 03:11 PM
3

Setting the limit at 65dB was the problem. He couldn't hear it. Which suggest it was discrimination to do so.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 08:29 AM
2

This is how men conquered the world and built civilization, we realized that emotions are not actually important in any real way. We conquered those as well.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 01:59 PM
1

All that is true. But I find no evidence any of that is happening. And overreacting is harmful too, telling children they're being harmed when they're not is harmful, controlling them emotionally and psychologically is also harmful.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 02:00 AM
2

No, because no child of mine would come home with news out of the blue. I'd have been kept well informed from the very onset of it. I'd know the details and I'd be on top of it, should it turn in to something it shouldn't. What I wouldn't do is make demands, or try to control my child's life unless there was ample evidence on which to do so. Doing so would only alienate them and drive them away from the support and guidance I could offer. And that leaves some real potential for harm. This is not…
/r/MensRights23/11/20 01:57 AM
2

Not paedophilia, not a sexual relationship, not a crime, not even wrong. I'm not MOVING, I'm standing firm. There are enough evils in the world without inventing new ones.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 01:42 AM
0

She isn't saying she has or even wanted a sexual relationship. So there is zero indication of paedophilia. There are enough real child abusers in the world, stop inventing new ones. You do a disservice to real victims.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 01:34 AM
0

No evidence of grooming.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 01:06 AM
1

I mean it's only the meaning of the word and it's not like there are not already enough child abusers to get angry about. But if you all really want to get all hot and bothered about this non-issue I can't stop you.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 12:13 AM
-1

Not automatically no. To be a paedophile the 19 y/o would have to have a sexual attraction to all children. And as they didn't have sex, and as it seems this one person is the preference, it's not paedophilia.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 11:22 PM
-1

No, that's not grooming, that's parenting. Try again.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 10:57 PM
0

You would have the world remain the same, and the cycle of abuse would continue. I would have the world changed for the better, and the cycle of abuse would reduce, and eventually, with compassion and treatment, child sexual abusers would get help and abuse victims would be saved from ever having been made in the first place. And your answer to this was: Hey, go fuck yourself you Pedo apologist. When this isn't even remotely a case of paedophilia... You sling shit, you don't make the world bette…
/r/MensRights22/11/20 09:55 PM
1

Like I said, in my eyes, you too are a child and as a child, you have not really had a wealth of experience on which to base your beliefs. You mostly repeat what you're told, you aren't breaking new ground here by the way. This is normal for every child. You knew of a case of abuse, but that does not mean that everything that is similar is abuse. My point wasn't to automatically make all cases right, or wrong, that would be stupid. My point was to show that all things being equal even 19 y/o and…
/r/MensRights22/11/20 09:45 PM
0

Yea, I wonder how this story will damage those children. They clearly had something and the adults took it away. It was a chance to show compassion and nourishment and now, no good comes of it all.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 09:13 PM
0

It's only karma. It's not like my views are mainstream, but I genuinely think that our current way of thinking of children damages the children.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 08:59 PM
0

You're 17 and you think you know what you're talking about. OK, that's the most amusing thing I've heard all day. I'm 40. To me, you're all children. You barely even out of nappies mate. Learn to think for yourself before you start to speak. As for swearing at you. Again, that's pretty fucking normal behaviour and your childlike analysis is just that, childlike. But, fair warning, if you call people paedophiles, they're likely to fight you. Basically, your argument comes down this: On one side o…
/r/MensRights22/11/20 08:45 PM
0

Isn't it the other way around though? I'm literally saying those things are not happening. And others are chomping at the bit hoping they're so they can virtue signal.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 08:00 PM
0

Let's be real here. You're a moron repeating what you have been told and making aspersions on my character for your own ego. If you argue this is paedophilia then you're wrong. You either don't know what paedophilia is, or you're just being an obstinant cunt about it. Paedophilia is SOLELY a sexual attraction to a youthful image. It is not child abuse, it is not wrong, it is not unnatural. It has existed since before our species existed, every bipedal humanoid precursor to homo sapiens had it. Y…
/r/MensRights22/11/20 07:56 PM
-1

I actually need a foundational reason to believe such things. I have not found one in this case. I doubt anyone plans to bring this down on themselves.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 07:39 PM
-1

As I said, you're so far up your own ass you literally would prefer children be harmed than give up your beliefs.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 07:31 PM
-21

Moron it is then. You are not helping children, you're just flinging shit. If everyone took your approach more children would end up abused. If they took my approach, genuine cases of child abuse would stand out from the crowd and be dealt with. YOU LITERALLY WOULD HURT CHILDREN FOR YOUR OWN EGO.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 06:49 PM
-2

Grooming requires some underlying objective and intent. Falling for someone who's younger than you isn't inherently wrong, it's what you do with that which counts. Everyone is going out of their minds about this, and it's reactionary nonsense. This is literally a non-issue, no one is doing anything wrong. There is so much worst going on in the world that actually needs attention.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 06:47 PM
1

There is no better way to get to men who need help than to declare that yes, men can need help and have a prominent webpage show them it's ok to need help.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 04:45 PM
5

I like running, but I'm no Linford Christie. Should I have extra help, maybe a head start, maybe christie should run barefoot, or just tie his laces together. When I see women wanting to do the dirty jobs, the life-sapping, life-draining, life-ending jobs then I'll listen to them about how men have it so good, and how men are privileged and how men are responsible for everything bad in the world. Women don't actually want equality, they want to control men.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 04:43 PM
2

They're a bit like an elderly demented relative.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 04:37 PM
-5

Are you a moron?
/r/MensRights22/11/20 04:33 PM
-7

They are not having sex. Happens IRL all the time. No one is being harmed by this, conflating it with grooming and paedophilia actually damages real victims, and does nothing to help anyone.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 04:17 PM
-23

Why is it not acceptable? I totally get it, but the way I see it they have not exceeded the parameters of a normal healthy relationship, and age difference alone isn't an indicator of something untoward happening. My parent have a significant agee difference and they met in their teens.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 02:36 PM
-70

No, it's not.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 01:49 PM
-81

Grooming him for what though? She doesn't seem to be trying to make him pose naked for pics she will trade on the internet for kudos. She isn't passing him around to all her friends, or drugging him and having him engage in lude acts with animals. What is the grooming in this case?
/r/MensRights22/11/20 12:38 PM
1

We're painted as raving women haters in every forum, newspaper and website. Google wouldn't dare upset the womenfolk like Starmer wouldn't dare upset a Zionist.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 05:16 PM
3

I'm not called Oafsalot because I played college football and had a 4.0 GPA. lol, I ugly.
/r/MensRights16/11/20 10:33 PM
11

She tries so hard to get all the buzzwords in there... And ends up saying this is terrorism... I mean, how does such an article seek to convince someone who has critical thinking skills, it just doesn't make any sense. She is talking about the minority as if they're the majority.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 07:46 PM
1

A lie can make good PR or bad PR. But if everyone believes the lie, that's the PR decision you have to make for the company. In any case, to the lowest lawful standard, it's not unjust or unright to save to Depp is a wife beater, even IF it's the slightest of wife beating that could happen. The Court have ruled on the evidence. Her admissions weren't in the ruling. She could have done the most wicked and evil things imaginable, but the court had no jurisdiction to comment on her admissions.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:56 PM
1

It's PR, she didn't lose a case about her guilt that was plastered all over the world's press. Are you saying companies should employ people in public-facing roles where the public are told they're a wife beater?
/r/MensRights07/11/20 09:31 PM
1

It's just about PR. Everyone now knows they were both guilty, to some extent. Which is normal in any dysfunctional relationship were neither will leave.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 02:52 PM
8

It's not a victimless crime, so examples must be made when they can be proven.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 09:08 AM
5

But we don't live longer...
/r/MensRights28/10/20 12:14 AM
1

I second this. We need to stop justifying ourselves and jus outright call them on it directly. Ask the basic question "What has feminism done to help men?"
/r/MensRights09/10/20 01:46 PM
2

Thanks /u/happy-cake-day-bot- you're the best.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 09:39 AM
4

Like it.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 08:13 AM
7

The revolutionaries of times past would say that actually it's OK to stoop, if it puts an end to the need for revolution.
/r/MensRights04/10/20 03:47 PM
1

If you're only having sex as a result of consent then it demonstrates your lack of a guilty mind, and as such the grey area between them indicating they want you to stop and you actually stopping should resolve in your favour. Otherwise the conditions of my consent are this. I consent only if you continue to consent.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 05:32 PM
12

The Police interviewed the child and she admitted it wasn't true. I'm not blaming the child, I'm blaming the parents. Because it likely started with the pressuring the child to tell them what they wanted.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 07:43 PM
58

It was determined by the police it was a lie. Presumably it was said at the preasure of parents. Did he touch you, he touched you didn't he, etc.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 03:59 PM
1

Well, slavery existed before the Slave trade and the America's. So no, I think I understand that the dictionary is the authority on the matter.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:35 PM
1

It would appear that they didn't have a meeting of the minds though. So how could they be in any sort of domestic partnership? They were PUT in that by the courts. Not by a meeting of their minds. ie, by force of law. He now not only has to pay an amount determined by his income, but he has to pay that amount even if he is no longer earning the same amount of money. So if he loses his job, he has to pay, if he needs to take time off for an injury, he has to pay. If he just wants to make his life…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:27 AM
1

What you're describing is not what slavery is. You're describing an era in which slavery took place and the parameters of that era slavery. Slavery is a word, it has a fairly simple meaning like most words. And working hard without proper remuneration is one of the meanings of the word slavery. That is to say, if, by force of law, you have to give up a large part of your legitimate income to another, without the right to appeal, and under threat of incarceration if you do not. So, it's forced la…
/r/MensRights22/09/20 07:28 PM
1

So slavery can ever be used as a term again in the context of the slave trade or something worst?
/r/MensRights22/09/20 06:14 PM
1

I know enough about history to know that just because one class had it bad doesn't mean a word falls out of use forever. Modern slavery is much different, but still, principally the same. The word has a valid use in today's age even though that use describes a somewhat different configuration of compulsion and consequence.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 06:46 AM
1

I agree with you, but that kind of slavery is behind us never to return. And it doesn't change what is actually happening now. Permanent incarceration is hardly trivial either. Because once you end up before a judge willing to lock you up for being behind, you're never going to ever get ahead again. I stand by my statement "it is slavery".
/r/MensRights21/09/20 04:22 PM
–

I get banned from places for posting here. I doubt anyone ever read my posts though.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 06:43 PM
3

If he stops working he can't pay it and then he get's punative circumstances until he either dies or has no choice. It may be insulated from being direct slavery, but it is slavery.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 12:05 PM
2

For the police, it would be, but for the public who're repeat victims, not so much.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 03:47 PM
3

I would say they don't need to be mandatory. But a parent should have the right to request one. And remember, they're not actually 100% so there is some risk involved.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 10:31 AM
1

The problem is, if we discuss retaliation, or revenge, or retribution here we get banned and it risks the subreddit to do it, because the mods and admins want it gone anyway. Basically if Modern Justice fails, Natures Justice should prevail.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 11:15 AM
7

They absolutely do wicked evil things and get away with it every time. The public interest clauses are used regularly to not prosecute informants who continue to offend while giving tips to stay out of jail, for example. Which is not in the public interests, it's in the polices interest.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 11:12 AM
14

It's not male privilege that does that, it's common fucking sense. The actual chances of being a victim of violence are vanishingly small. Also, men don't give in to their feelings, so it's not like we don't have fear we just tend to disregard it, because most of the time it's wrong.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 09:16 AM
6

Men just don't share this. Because to do so makes the people they're sharing with think it could have some truth to it. It's always what did the man to deserve it, and that's the root of the problem.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 05:20 PM
2

I agree, anyone acting under the banner os feminism is their problem to police. And if they won't police them then it's entirely right and proper that we take it as granted that is what they wanted from the start.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 04:10 PM
-8

I agree with you, the US should hand out free firearms and as many bullets as you can carry away to every single person. On one basis, they never ever get a passport. That should sort itself out in a few generations.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 11:02 AM
1

I was rude as fuck and hostile to these social workers. I had assumed that because all my efforts had been for nought that they were not on my side. I was completely fucking wrong, and so are you. My earliest experience with the idea that the system is broken was when my boss, who worked his ass off to provide for his family, took all his meds and had a bath with several bottles of wine the day after his wife won custody and he lost all but insignificant contact with all his kids. I was 15. Late…
/r/MensRights23/08/20 10:11 AM
1

If they fuck off and do nothing then they never know mum is the fuck up and never intervene, they have to put the checks to ever know if they need to intervene. You can't have it both ways, if you want a system of non-intervention then you literally allow one parent to control the other. In the UK children have three parents, the mum, the dad and the state. If the mum and dad can't agree then the state chooses for them, that can happen in many different ways, by the direct intervention of social…
/r/MensRights23/08/20 08:38 AM
1

It's absolutely standard practice and completely legal. In retrospect I would be concerned if they were not doing them, remember they often only find out about bad parents from keeping years of data on them. Little tells are not enough to interfere with a family, but if they have several and establish a course of conduct they can get the court to allow them to interfere. It works the other way too, if they do this and find nothing, then all future social workers are reassured that their efforts …
/r/MensRights23/08/20 07:40 AM
1

They do one for everyone, they just dont usually do one for fathers who hjave full custody because that's rare as rocking horse shit. And when they did mine, and they did a few, I was pretty uptight about it because who the fuck likes to be questioned, but in reflection, they asked the same questions to everyone and they were not particularly prejudiced, just ignorant, because it never fucking happens. And my son is great, thanks.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 07:22 AM
3

Have you been paying attention, because if you have then that's all you need to know.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 06:59 AM
67

I was actually just thinking that Feminism has taught women to be terrified of half of life, half of their interactions are with men. And in teaching them to be terrified they have control over them and what they think. If I was terrified all my life I'd be a political pushover too. Thank god I'm a man, right. I literally don't let my emotions and feeling control me, even when I should probably be terrified, I'm not. It's almost as if that is half the battle to just being free.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 06:49 AM
2

I know the feeling, for me it's not quite as bad. But I'm mentally ill and autsitic and well, it's impossible for me to engage with the other parents.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 04:53 AM
0

As a single father with full custody, I can honestly say the only time I come across this is with other parents. Schools and social services are more or less honest from the beginning if there is any risk assessments they have to do.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 04:51 AM
3

Unless he wasn't OK with it, and that's why he fell...
/r/MensRights22/08/20 06:49 PM
1

Sounds like "just grab em by the pussy" Trump
/r/MensRights04/08/20 10:01 PM
11

But men do it to themselves, it's toxic masquilinity... /s
/r/MensRights30/07/20 03:20 PM
2

Sounds about right.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 09:12 PM
1

Look up when men, generally, got the right to vote and then compare it to when women got it... In most cases it's not that long after.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 04:32 PM
1

Yes, but I wonder what the legality is if say, you ship the products to another country and then get the results electronically.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 04:31 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 04:30 PM
0

I never said that. Feelings lead people astray all the time. Listening to them is like rolling a dice, only when you roll a dice you immediately know if the roll is the answer you really want. Emotions are tricky for young men especially and teaching them to express themselves like women hasn't been working very well. I'm just saying, men and women are worlds apart and the way we feel an emotion and the intensity and range of emotion we feel is totally different and motivated by aeons of biologi…
/r/MensRights14/07/20 02:14 AM
0

I disagree, but fair enough.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 09:12 PM
-3

Knowing what meaningless shit is and being able to recognise it is incredibly life-affirming. How do you think we went from cavemen to spacemen? Do you think emotions got us up from worshipping fire and hiding from the rain to building industries and going to the moon? You just let women tell you no only what you ought to feel but also how you should feel it. And now you believe that anyone who doesn't agree with you is wrong and society did it. Which again, is what Feminism is saying men should…
/r/MensRights13/07/20 08:15 PM
-1

Emotions are leftovers from a time when we were small scurrying rodents running around in the dirt. They have almost no practical purpose, serve no useful role, and ultimately create the problems men end up having to solve.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 07:58 PM
–

Men don't typically think it's unfair. We want better, but nothing is unfair about the natural state of affairs. You get what you get and you try to make the best of it, but it's not unfair if someone else had it easier, or harder. What is incredibly unfair is what feminism has done to men. Convincing the world that the best source for mens issues is a women.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 01:55 AM
23

This is utter nonsense. It's almost always a ban followed by a thread delete. If you can find me any living examples I'd be surprised.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 10:36 PM
4

Most likely you're about to find out that we don't think differently from you at all and that there are no sides, not from us anyway.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 10:33 PM
2

Yes, there was one on LegaladviceUK earlier today, he got 4 years in prison and 8 years with no internet activity following it. And life sexual offenders register. That's what happens.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 05:45 PM
15

Only need to walk down the high street to see who has all the money and what they spend it on.
/r/MensRights10/06/20 02:20 PM
0

I did some research on this: It varies by place and culture. Sometimes FGM is actually cutting out the clitoris at the root with an item that resembles a sharpened spoon. They actually dig it out like scooping ice cream. I think we can agree, that's MUCH fucking worst than circumcision. Trimming the labia or removing the clitoral hood is more common, but it's not the same. It's like comparing apples and oranges, they're both spherical and have a skin, but if you bite into them you recognise imme…
/r/MensRights07/06/20 08:15 PM
1

As I read it, it's not entirely the same as a woman who's got herself drunk saying the drink means she didn't consent. This is more like drink or drugs inducing a substantially altered state of mind as to be unlike normal intoxication. One that was not forseen. This is more like, not guilty due to not being in my right mind.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 07:53 PM
1

You imitated white supremacists... I mean come on, of course they banned you.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 01:48 PM
3

White females are the most protected class of people ever to have existed in all of time.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 08:48 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights29/05/20 01:43 AM
3

Stalking users, even across reddit, it against TOS.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 12:59 PM
1

Don't be silly, women don't go to jail! She revels in it though, serious or not it's about attention and it sure does get her some.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 01:23 PM
2

So charge her with perverting the course of justice x 1000 and let her sentence be served consecutively.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 05:35 PM
2

That's just a matter of perspective though. If you're a women or a man you will see if differently.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 03:39 PM
1

Women complain about Mens humour concerning women. Wouldn't be able to do that if we kpet them in the kitchen where they belong, right fellas?
/r/MensRights22/05/20 02:46 PM
1

Yup, totally gone. Can't find it in search.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 01:58 PM
1

Lol, yea, it's a business. But it's playing on the core belief that everything is patriarchial oppression.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 11:17 PM
1

I've never said they wouldn't still have a biological imperative that drives them to consider breasts as something to be desired (in feeding your offspring kind of way). The sexualization of the female image is very much media driven, men grow up in a sexualised enviroment and learn only what they're exposed to. On the other hand, consider tribal culture, where basically everyone is naked. Do you think those men consider the breasts they see as titillation, literally?
/r/MensRights29/04/20 04:01 PM
1

If you can't tell the difference between watching porn and living in place were breats are free then I feel sorry for you. Also, stop hanging around high schools, people are going to start thinking there is something wrong with you.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 03:53 PM
-1

Yes, that's typically how these things work. Desire can be sated by exposure therapy. If you literally grow up with them in plain sight, then they become nothing more than back ground noise.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 01:35 PM
14

No, I went to Spain and saw lots of women with them out. And wondered how it worked, and learned in the process of asking people, that it's perfectly normal there. No one bats an eye at a set of naked knockers.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 12:06 PM
-12

Been there and seen it with my own eyes. If you want to quantify it, by all means, go and see for yourself.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 11:37 AM
-16

Don't seem to be so concerned with them as they're everwhere.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 11:22 AM
31

In Spain women bathe and tan topless on the beaches and no one bats an eye.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 10:52 AM
2

I have popcorn and candy sticks... And a comfy chair. Should be fun.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 02:15 PM
1

Comedy is usually OK. This one made me chuckle.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 07:52 PM
3

Supply and demand in a relatively safe setting. This is hardly people trafficking or pimping is it. Somehow I have to wonder what would happen if they just legalised it. Would it reduce offenders in other catagories?
/r/MensRights09/04/20 03:21 PM
-8

He promoted herd immunity when we need a lock down. He killed people with that, it was contrary to his chosen experts advice and no other nation did anything remotely like it. He fucking deserves it. I hope its the worst case ever to have existed. I hope he lives with massively reduced lung capacity and I hope he gasps and chokes on every breathe from now untill the day he finally rolls over and dies.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 08:28 PM
7

Western women have literally never had it better in all of time immomorial. But they're going through some shit and now they want a pass. lol
/r/MensRights27/03/20 02:40 PM
2

Women are quite capable of violence. They just categorize it in such a way as to make it no readily apparent.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 09:10 PM
8

I've had to stop mum and gran seeing son because of this. It's just a neccesary thing to do until we're sure the virus is under control.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 01:08 PM
14

It didn't need to pass. it's manifestly happening already.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 12:48 AM
0

Angry males don't just become terrorists. It takes a pretty toxic system to produce them, one they have little or no control over.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:41 PM
2

Lie detectors do not work. They only open up the possibility of a relied upon false posistive. A negative will not be used as evidence.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 11:13 AM
1

People are going drugs and havings sex in those restrooms, a few needles here, a little tinfoil there. A used condom or two. Those locks will be gone.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 04:02 PM
9

There is this awkward gap between people coming forward because the punishment is light and they feel guilty and people not doing it in the first place because the punishment is harsh and they want to avoid it. I feel like this is OK, so long as we're going to get to the second state by slowly increasing the punishments. If we just get stuck in the first state then that unjust and unfair.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 07:16 PM
1

Isn't it statistically more likely mum kills the kids not dad?
/r/MensRights22/02/20 04:02 PM
1

As part of the plea, Zachary also agreed never to appeal. As much as I hate to say it, this appears to be an admission on the part of the prosecuter that an appeal would be succesful. Also, WTF are they going to do, retry him for the crimes. A Jury would laugh at this.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 11:46 PM
1

Also collective punishment.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 06:01 PM
6

Actually, because it makes more friction it's more likely to remove skin and expose people to infection via blood/fluid contact.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 08:01 PM
4

The central premise of feminism, outside of some conspiratorial shit, is that females got the shit end of the stick. And if you just go by count, they did. But they forget 99.9% of males got the very same stick too. We are oppressed, but by psychopaths and sociopaths who we have allowed to have power over us. It's all our faults we're in this mess, and the infighting between the sexes only prolongs it. Feminism has become another form of oppression, it won't free people, it won't empower women, …
/r/MensRights30/01/20 05:34 PM
2

Built civilization from caves up. Men... The violence is a necessary part of the evolutionary process. It isn't bad, or good, it's how you use it.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 01:31 AM
1

Women lie, got it.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 12:00 AM
1

This is going to happen a lot more often in future. SU's all over the world are basically corrupt special interest groups.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 04:09 PM
-7

Males by definition don't give up. We're programmed to fight first, question second.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 11:55 PM
1

Feminism man, feminism. It's laughable.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 07:28 PM
1

Have you made a complaint? The police will consider it over once they have established that the crime they're investigating didn't happen. They won't naturally go on to charge the accuser of lying unless there is a complaint that can be upheld. You may want to speak to your lawyer about what crime you could be a victim of. Harassment comes to mind.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 10:44 AM
2

There is no win condition for you. You're going to get trolled, you're going to get debated by idiots, and you're going to get downvoted over and over again. This sub isn't run by MRA's anymore. It's about time we accepted that and moved on.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 11:32 AM
4

But then they'd take jobs from women, we can't have that. /s
/r/MensRights01/01/20 12:42 AM
1

Sure thing, I'll remember that next time I stop to give a shit.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 01:41 AM
1

Oh please, you make a personal attack on my character. You already lost. Have a nice day, moron.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 01:19 AM
-25

Yes, but it's for an entirely different process to establish that.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 12:10 AM
-31

The separation of mother and baby is not unusual. however the baby is made the biological parents have a duty to support it. This baby should be raised as a his brother by his parents. And she aught to pay for it too.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 11:44 PM
3

Terrorism is defined by the state as any attempt to alter the state through violence.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 11:38 PM
1

I don't' have those things though. Nor do 99% of males. This power you think men exercise over women, 1% of men evercise over EVERYONE.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 11:36 PM
1

So they have the money and spend it, but that's not enough. The business is catering to their needs and desires, but that's not enough. Politicians are bending over backwards the world over to make female friendly laws, but that's not enough. There is a two tier system of justice, but that's not enough. Crazy people think like that. Sane people think like us.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 08:57 PM
-6

When the women lack the merit of the men, but the women are selected because of existant gender ratios. That is positive discrimination.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 12:41 AM
-2

All males are singled out.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 12:39 AM
1

It swings in roundabouts.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 10:14 PM
-46

Yes, there is. That's where people typically denied advancement are given it over others in spite of merit.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 10:04 PM
-55

Positive discrimination has its downsides.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 09:10 PM
2

My advice is to just pick your battles. You dont' have to always be an adamant speaker for mens rights, sometimes you can just nod and smile. Thanks for speaking up though, we appriciate you.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 06:00 PM
9

Walk down your local high street, see all the shops selling to women. See the shop selling to men, full of women buying for their men. Sexism against women doesn't exist, they have power in finance, they have power in politics, they have power in law. All the ways in which power matters they have it. There is no sexism against women, unless they tell you there is then obviously they should be believed.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 06:16 PM
62

Welcome to the future, where she can glass you in the face but if you hit her back it's 2 years and a life time criminal record. FEMINISM baby yea, the equality we've all be waiting for.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 05:47 PM
9

Do you realise that a lot of feminists will persecute you for this belief?
/r/MensRights27/12/19 05:32 PM
4

Grounds for an immediate appeal, no?
/r/MensRights26/12/19 06:06 PM
-1

Just think about our last prime ministers, they all went to Eton. Just think about it's ratio of white to non-white. It's about 40:1. And that's today, 20 years ago it was 1000:1. Just because you're working hard in uni doesn't mean you get a place in these universities. You still need to pay for it. But more often than not the people you hear about running the government went to one. How does that work out for you? I was born into a shithole too. I went to university, a good one. it made no dif…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 09:20 PM
-3

If you know about the UK you know that the schooling these men got privileged them to a great degree. Those schools were for wealthy males who were white. And most only accept a few who are not even now. I'm not saying it's not sexist and racist to point that out. But at the same time, it's a fucking boot on all our knecks. 99.99999% of people will never know that sort of privilege. And it's not unfair of the people who're not white nor male to point it out. Though they really should considet ho…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 07:38 PM
0

It was 10 million vs 12 million. I'm not sure they lost 2 million men. Every seat they lost was a close call. Brexit dominated this election, it was obvious. But the Tories will not be ending austerity, they will not stop gimping public services and schools. In 5 years the worm will turn.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 03:19 PM
7

A friend in the UK had one in his glove box and he was convicted because the cop said he had told him it was for protection. He was a mechanic, his car was in bits, it was obviously not for protection. But the cop said he said it, so they gave him a suspnded sentance.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 04:44 PM
1

How is that possible though, even I don't believe me. And I've lived with me for 40 years.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 08:01 PM
1

I can and I will. You just watch me.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 07:47 PM
-3

I don't engage in mental combat with the unarmed.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 07:43 PM
1

But why was it relevant?
/r/MensRights12/12/19 07:01 PM
-1

Why do people insist on using autism as a perjorative?!
/r/MensRights12/12/19 06:46 PM
23

We were all slaves to society for the better 99% of human history. Men didn't exactly fair better, and still don't.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 06:04 PM
-19

She is the front person for a greater movement for sure. But she is also the best chance we have right now. Amplifying the message is important, to life as we know it.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 06:03 PM
1

When choosing the voice for the cockpit in fighter jets they found a women's voice to be the most readily listened to. It says things like 'Pull Up', etc. This was true of female pilots too. Greta is the most likely to be listened to. That has nothing to do with politics or gender and is completely to do with biololgy and nature.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 06:02 PM
-3

Given the current shit the Tories want to pull I implore you to think about the bigger picture. Don't vote Tory.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 04:28 PM
1

Where have I heard this before?
/r/MensRights25/11/19 02:33 PM
18

DO NOT GIVE UP! Persist. There is no point in doing this unless you're willing to go all the way.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 03:15 PM
1

Awww. That got me in the feels.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 11:58 AM
2

I wonder if he isn't held on secret terrorism charges.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 02:29 PM
19

Men don't care. Women would whinge and whine and pout until someone did something.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 08:34 PM
5

This was a new evidence appeal. It's down to his counsel to find evidence of his innocence.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 09:19 PM
2

In feminist fantasy, it's possible they were all raped and that there was no rapist. The all sex is rape crowd, etc.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 04:51 PM
1

In other news women hate men, what's new?
/r/MensRights28/10/19 07:09 PM
3

Misandry is everywhere, and yet nowhere. People are all about misogyny and how it's impacted the world as if there was some grand conspiracy of males against everyone else. But misandry is worst, in a way, because it actually is as a consequence of a conspiracy of females against males. And more often than not against whites too, if they're male. I always assumed at some point this worm would turn, but the more that time goes on the more I worry for my son, who will have to live in a world that …
/r/MensRights28/10/19 04:00 PM
-4

Is this gender bias, or is it the complete opposite. I would presume any positive effect this has on males consequently has a negative effect on the females. If indeed it has any effect at all. I had a teacher who would make us all stand when she came in. No one could sit next to another person, we all had separated desks in her class. She actually got results though.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 09:35 AM
15

It should be mentioned she spends the other half with the threat of recall if she commits any further offences and can receive additional sentencing if she contacts the victim as well as additional charges, she also would end up on remand while awaiting trial if she did. It's not like we let em off with half their sentence and a pat on the back not to do it again.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 09:30 AM
1

It should certainly be a sexual offence to lie about a sexual offence. But as I don't agree with the way the registry works anyway, I don't think it's appropriate anyway.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 06:19 PM
23

Can confirm, dad reflexes are a real phenomenon.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 03:08 PM
1

I only have sex with those who consent, if you don't consent then I'm the one being raped.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 07:51 PM
3

It's not just innocents. Females are protected, males are disposable.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 04:43 PM
4

In all fairness, it's typical of everyone.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:11 PM
1

If you're male and not an MRA then that's a problem too.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 09:49 PM
1

Evidence, you want evidence, this is reddit, we don't need no stinkin evidence here... But seriously you think men have it all together and are without flaw? Because that perhaps is the problem we should approach first.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 09:44 PM
1

I'll be honest, it isn't a majority of feminist who hold the sick views we appose. The problem isn't the sick ones, the problem is the enablers who chose to not speak out against them. So long as feminism does not police it's own then it's own must be policed for it. The same however goes for us MRA's, we certainly have a problem with our movement and we seemingly chose not to speak out against it. We aught to make that a priority, we don't. And I think we should be shamed for that.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 09:36 PM
1

You'd die for your penis?
/r/MensRights15/08/19 04:01 PM
1

See you've done it too. You're seeing it in terms of what she did. She preserved the life of her loving partner, who would chose otherwise. Just because she couldn't live with it doesn't make it about her. If he were gay I think you'd see it differently. When life give you lemons you make goddamn lemonade.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 03:28 PM
1

Losing a vital part of one anatomy can change a person in ways no one can predict. This man needs professional help and outing himself on the internet like this is a sure sign he's probably about to attempt suicide. Honestly, to help someone like this you have to look further than the women who left him and comments on how she is wrong miss the point entirely.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 02:32 PM
1

I'm about as left as they get... So there's that.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 03:01 PM
1

What. No charges and requisite time in prison?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:47 PM
1

I'm only saying what the court will. Being a parent is a benefit not a burden.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 05:45 PM
1

You're talking about the child maintenance the government manages. You have right to a DNA test for that. But for court awarded maintenance if you've acted as a fatherly figure to the child the child is entitled to continued support, so you pay it even if the DNA comes back negative.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 02:29 PM
1

A man is liable if he takes on a child as if it was his own. He becomes defacto the father of the child and must continue to pay child support if he breaks up with the mother.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 02:06 PM
1

It'll never succeed on those grounds. If he sued because he's been denied the chance to have his own son for 8 years that may work because that's a loss that can't be quantified or paid back. UK courts are not like US courts, you can't usually get damages or losses back for things like this. The judge will decide he had the benefit of loving a son for eight years, even if it was his genetics that made them.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 02:04 PM
1

I often wonder why men do this. I decided it's simple, because it's a survival trait. Man learned long ago that feelings and emotions are not only bad for us, but would outright get us killed if we listened to them all the time.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 06:21 PM
1

One can only hope she doesn't illicit any sympathy from her block mates.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 09:12 PM
1

If men were all powerful feminism would never have gotten off the ground.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 06:34 PM
1

Usually they say you can't bring a lawyer.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 09:01 AM
1

No I just like dark humour.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 10:22 AM
0

Everyone knows he's a freak.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 05:25 PM
2

Oh come on, Trump would be into it. He just doesn't know it yet.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 05:08 PM
0

Why just one big bubba. I was thinking of a gang bang scenario where everyone get's a hole, and sometimes even two to a hole.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 04:55 PM
1

If you're only having sex as a result of consent then you don't have the mens rea to commit a criminal act if she withdraws her consent half way through a thrust.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:29 PM
1

You have a computer connected to the internet, why don't you just google it?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 06:20 PM
1

So if a man doesn't want to raise his child, he doesn't have to. And then if still doesn't want to provide for his child, then he doesn't have to either. Like I said, infantilising men is not a solution to the problem.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:55 PM
1

The system doesn't benefit me, I'm a male. When women neglect their children we often remove them and put them into care. A universal system to provide for children is fair. What we have no is often not fair. Making it completely optional, well it is optional, you don't need to make children, in making them you have social contract to your best for them, when that isn't enough the state will step in with benefits, when that isn't enough the state will remove the children.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:52 PM
1

Like I said, I'm not interested in burning it all down for a few outliers. Perhaps their aught to be a recompense for women who do those things. We have victim compensation schemes, maybe they aught to hold on to a claim against the women to come due when the child turns 18. ie, bitches gotta pay it all back.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:18 PM
1

Alas that is part of the problem, for which we need a more suitable solutions. But financial services have come a long way, if the child support was a pre-paid debit card and all transactions were on the record then we'd be able to dispute frivolous spending with the courts. Sure a small amount would have to be cash, but at the same time that amount will go down as more and more services are card only?!
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:05 PM
-1

Yes, that the key to responsibility, it's not all lavish parties and reckless abandon, at some point the negatives come along. And we have to take them seriously. Children in our society are so fucked up by it, we have a duty to the next generation to look after them and nurture them until they can make their way in the world. And in return, for this social contract, we get looked after when we're elderly and can't do it ourselves. It's not a hard concept to grasp, it's been going this way since…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:01 PM
0

You don't abort a child, your abort a fetus. I am very consistent, except when I'm not, and you'll know about then.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 05:58 PM
-2

So because an extreme exist all the middle ground should be trampled? I'm with you on this, it should be improved upon. But to suggest that we're not responsible adults in the majority of cases and therefore actually responsible for the consequences of our choices and actions is to outright turn us into children. Feminism has been infantalising women for many years now, let's not follow them down that path.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 05:29 PM
–

For the majority of cases that isn't happening though. It's hard to see how the whole process needs to be gotten rid of because it isn't perfect. Nothing in life is perfect.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 05:15 PM
–

As a full time single parent I don't always agree with these opinions. Child support is supposed to be for the child. If it were only enforced as such it would not be unfair. However the child came into existence it deserves and needs the support of at least two parents, be they biological or not. A lot of parents are happy to pay to support their children even after a relationship has broken down. It is not black and white.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 01:01 PM
–

Well that was not worth the time it took to read.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:34 PM
–

Nah this sort of thinking is backwards. We aught to support Abortive rights, because a lot of women make those decisions with their partners. The Feminazi, rad fem, etc, is the loud minority. Countering them is counter productive to the best interests of the majority. Basically we should support women's rights to abortions because it's the right thing to do, and that's the better path.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:08 PM
3

Don't be dis-heartend, make those four days the best four days they can be. Don't give up either, get back to court soon and ask for more time, persist.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:02 AM
1

One of the few times I see a truth to the idea of toxic masculinity. One of, the few...
/r/MensRights13/05/19 07:40 PM
-1

There is no such thing. MGTOW was always going to become a toxic place. The premise is entirely wrong. People are fucking sick, sick to themselves, sick to each other, sickening. Give them half a chance and they show it. But at the same time people are amazing, fantastic, creative and generous. Give them the other half of that chance and they will show it. This is true of everyone, no matter their gender, sex or orientation. MGTOW was always the wrong half of the chance.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 07:36 PM
15

No, the lesson sadly is in the article. Don't save women, it's a liability. Let them save themselves.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 08:54 PM
1

With the "people" he chooses to have in his life.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 07:43 PM
1

Just like you are responsible for you, I'm only responsible for me.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 09:25 AM
3

Don't rely on others. If you don't want the risk of making babies don't have sex, or let your sperm out of your control. If you're having sex, with protection or without, there is a chance, however small, that you're going to make a baby. Be responsible for that chance, you chose to have sex after all. Hopefully the future will bring about more solid birth control for males, but until it does never rely on a women, or a condom, to prevent pregnancy.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 06:16 AM
2

It's odd how much reactionary violence there is there. If we had even 1% of that here we'd be banned.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 09:40 PM
5

He's giong through trauma at the moment, he will need time and space to process the reality. He was probably looking forward to being exonerated at a trial. Now he has the worst outcome for him, other than being guilty. Why did he go through it all to have the opportunity of being found not guilty taken from him. You can't fix this I'm afraid. It's natural and he will have to find his own recovery. You can stick by him, you can minimise your relationship, you are allowed to be selfish. Maybe in …
/r/MensRights17/04/19 07:53 PM
1

I couldn't even take my ex to court for over 2 years. She got lost in the system, either no one would report he location to my solicitor or they didn't' have an up to date one to report. But once she was found out for who she truly was I got contact through social services, with a view to him coming to live with me if she didn't turn her life around. She was never going to do that. This didn't happen automatically however as social services believed I was myself a child abuser and rapist. They o…
/r/MensRights16/04/19 06:57 PM
5

In the UK it's more like they enforce their own brand of amorality. Especially in the lower courts.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 11:43 AM
1

Reddit is a game people play on the internet for points.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 01:12 PM
2

You only need to walk down a high street in the UK to see who has all the money.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 06:41 PM
7

Torres, who is now 38, and Terrell preserved embryos in 2014 after she was diagnosed with bilateral breast cancer and an oncologist said she likely couldn't bear children after chemotherapy. This only applies to people who've lost the ability to have children. Which is interesting in and of itself. Still blatantly contrary to what they both agreed too. Which means contracts mean nothing.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 02:15 PM
2

The issue is how consent is viewed. For a male having an erection is consent. I was speaking in more vague terms about it. But you're right, technically they have their own special offence, but that offence is rarely considered and even if it were it doesn't come with the stigma tied to rape. I don't know if that means it would be better to make a new offence for males as well, to remove the stigma, or to rename the female offence as rape, to make it clear we do consider it to be just as importa…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:10 AM
7

In the UK they can't be rapists. And there is no offence of enveloping a penis with a vagina. So it's not going to happen.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 09:35 AM
1

Problem is the criminal justice system isn't perfect, not every crime can be proven, doesn't mean it didn't happen. Plus, there has to be some motivator for the accuser to stand up and admit they made a mistake, or just made it up. If we have severe punishments it just motivates them to keep quiet and double down on trying to get away with it.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 03:11 PM
3

The problem is feminism controlling a narrative and using divisive politics to keep people 'controlled'.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 12:41 PM
9

Teach women not to rape. Amirite?
/r/MensRights04/02/19 04:49 PM
2

This is technically cyber stalking, but red admins don't care as long it's in favour of their own narrow beliefs.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 03:02 PM
1

No it knows that making decisions and actions based on feelings is pointless and leads to serious problems. Men built civilization by being rational, not emotional.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:49 PM
1

I prefer to be ruled by my rational mind, if that means suppressing emotion so be it.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 06:11 PM
1

You'd think that intelligence services wouldn't compromise on quality of staff.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 02:09 PM
1

I was once described as a terrorist because I'm an MRA. By a police officer when I told him, as he was trained to use force in a way that didn't leave marks he was more vulnerable to false allegations than I was.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 10:16 AM
1

You got ban for also posting here. It's actually a form of online harassment.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 09:29 AM
11

No doubt feminists have some creative way to explain how this is actually the mans fault and they deserved it. How it's completely different to what women suffer.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 06:42 PM
43

He wouldn't get to prison.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 08:06 PM
1

See I think that inference is up to the jury or the judges. If someone has done something that brings doubt to their current claims then that's relevant. Certainly if someone has raped before that would go against them when accused again.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 09:47 AM
2

If someone has a history of false allegations I'd want that to be known before I was convicted. The social backlash is media driven, if we placed limits on the media when reporting on active cases we would avoid a lot of the problems we have now.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 09:11 AM
2

I think there is a public interest in knowing the names of the accuser and defendant. I don't think they aught to be secret. I think it also makes sense for the prosecutors to take cases they are much more likely to succeed than this one.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 08:26 AM
11

By charging her with a crime and taking her to court, which the police will never do because it may stop others from doing the same thing she has done.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:34 PM
4

Yes but no matter how much care it won't go away. So why try, there are much more important things to worry about.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 12:11 AM
8

It was written by feminists obviously. Do we care though, no. We're much stronger than that. I'm not an anti feminist, I'm an anti idiocy, it just happens that makes up a lot of feminism.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 09:31 PM
12

I pay for someone to come once every two weeks and do 4-5 hours of domestic chores. My house is spotless most of the time. I can not fathom how a house would require that daily. These people must live in mansions.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 09:17 PM
2

Are thoust mocking me?
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:41 PM
69

This man did the google fu and it's not what you think.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 06:24 PM
-12

Nature and biology. There is no way to make us equal in this sense. Just improvements and teaching responsibility. Maybe technology will come full circle and men will just be able to take a pill too. Who knows.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:05 PM
1

We have a clause in the UK that a third child doesn't get child support, unless it was rape. Guess what happened. I honestly don't know how it would be tested. I guess I expect people to be honest about it, which I know is asking a lot.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 04:57 PM
-14

I'm still not convinced, men get the choice of creating the baby, or not. Maybe there aught to be some clauses for genuine accidents, mistakes and rape. But ultimately your father is still your father no matter what clauses there are. Personally I'm of the opinion that children deserve parents and for the most part parents knew what they were doing when they made the baby.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 04:50 PM
17

This isn't just an activism subreddit though, it's also a support group and a social group and many other things. There are a lot of angry men, we can't just turn them away because they have a grievance.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 05:46 PM
45

This sub has quite the life of it's own and goes through cycles of serious and non serious, of anti feminist and pro MRA. You've just got to let it happen. Being an MRA is a little like going through the stages of grief, we're at some stage or another and here we all mix together. Some are angry, some have forgiven, it's a mess of men all coming together to support one another. There is no wrong way to do it.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 02:07 PM
2

Hey, there is nothing inherently wrong with people who're sociopaths having an opinion. We can't just censor everyone who insists that people deserve much worst than they got.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 08:06 PM
1

I think they can still have STD's though.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 07:51 PM
4

This assumes that men are incapable of telling the difference between a doll and a women... Which is bullshit on every level.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:24 PM
5

They'd have stalked through your post history eventually and found a reason.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 08:28 AM
6

Pretty much standard operating procedure. My solicitor warned me to expect it when I went to family court for my son.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 11:29 AM
3

Man this women belongs in a hospital, with secure doors and lots of downers.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 09:25 PM
28

No they don't. the clitoral hood does, but the clitoris is much smaller and has the same number of nerve endings as the head of the penis. FGM often includes cutting off the clitoris entirely. The equivalent in men would be removing the head of the penis.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 02:13 PM
3

Can confirm, people are entitled cunts and they deserve what they collectively get. The good can go with the bad as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 11:36 PM
1

There is some new law in the UK that allows a resident to use a weapon to defend themselves in or around their own home. Normally she would be guilty for using the knife irregardless of if he was threatening to kill her. This was one of the reasons this law wasn't passed much earlier, it could be abused to potentially murder people. I actually used this law to defend myself a few years back, I'd have been serving time if it hadn't been introduced.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 10:36 AM
5

You have a penis how can you not be misogynistic? - Any Feminist
/r/MensRights04/11/18 08:59 PM
1

Ideally she aught to have braked and come to a stop, she had time to, she just made a judgement call. The jury obviously believed her or she would have been convicted of the greater offence and sentenced accordingly.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 06:15 PM
5

They will ban you just for posting here. I recently got banned from /r/anarchism for posting here. The irony, no?
/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:21 PM
4

I wonder how long it'll take for one to pass training... then I also wonder how long before they quit.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 04:24 PM
1

Who said anything about feminists.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 01:50 PM
1

But coming from women, that makes emotional sense. It's not logical, women primary care is not for what happens, but for how they feel about it. Men care what happens, and don't care how they feel about it, that's why men made civilisation and practically everything in it.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 08:45 PM
15

Men must act like women to be accepted by women. Women are incapable of accepting that being a man is as valid as being a women.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 01:26 PM
2

The current problem is that lots of subs are banning anyone who's participated here, or like here. There are organised groups going around outing people and direct mods to ban them. According to reddit rules this is harassment, but none of the admins actually seem to care, in fact it would appear to be endorsed by the admins, who for some reason want to see undesirable subreddits gone, one way or another.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 11:52 AM
1

Let's face it, there is no real chance that they will ban misandry. Women will always be free to scream "kill all me" and "all men are rapist", or whatever.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 05:50 PM
3

Never, not once... With guys however every time but once.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 08:30 AM
7

Remember kids, don't marry, ever. Not even ONCE.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 01:10 PM
14

Don't be prey. Best advice.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:15 PM
3

Typically yes. Parents are responsible for the liability of anything the child does in bad faith.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 10:38 PM
14

What quality did powerful white men have that made them powerful over other white men, a majority, who have no power at all? Could it be that it's not because they're white, or men, could it be they're sociopaths and psychopaths?
/r/MensRights05/10/18 01:00 PM
4

Assuming it's razor sharp it could be used in defence, to cut the nerves and tendons in the fore arms, striking each time someone grabs or punches. But you'd also have to know how to use it to do that, not just have a knife. Just having a knife will get you killed with said knife more times than it'll protect you.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:59 PM
1

Yup, pretty much a return to them being second class citizens only this time it'll be completely fucking justified. This assumes of course they don't manipulate enough men to fight for them
/r/MensRights01/10/18 06:56 PM
1

I like it. Also, congrats. It took me 2 years, and one awful mother, for me to get custody of my son. Best thing that ever happened to me.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 09:30 PM
3

Ideological censorship from Reddit. Say it isn't so.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 12:18 PM
3

No custodial sentence? Seems like telling the police porkies aught to get your time in a cell.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 12:04 PM
4

All sex is rape though.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 06:48 PM
5

Yup, the suffragettes were terrorists by today's standards.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:25 PM
2

I just had one of these on the hook on Facebook. She couldn't help herself and kept coming back for more. I was perfectly respectful, she was a vitriolic spewing hate monger after three replies. She just called for reinforcements. I can't help but pity these people, reason and logic are completely lost on them.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 10:09 AM
16

That's mainly religion not politics though.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:04 PM
68

It would have been challenged a long time ago if it didn't intrinsically support women.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 06:23 PM
569

Feminists?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 02:55 PM
8

That's a worrying trend. And you can't report wikis/subs as harassing to reddit, only posts, comments, etc. Where do we complain about that subreddit? If you want to complain about this sub goto: https://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/ and click 'message the admins' on the right. Or click this link https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2Freddit.com
/r/MensRights12/09/18 08:51 AM
1

She isn't actually going to get anything from him, she is just trying her luck. The supreme court are right, the family court has to examine every claim on it's merits, and can't just strike out a claim because of it's apparent absurdity.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:56 AM
2

This is sad, punishing a trans person for not having the right equipment. This wasn't an offence, they consented to sex. Consent is much more broad than permission.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 05:44 PM
2

Isn't that illegal?! Surely they must have had another reason.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:27 AM
3

Yup, it's utterly backwards. If anything Women and Children have always been given a step up in life. By the time a boy is a man he has to fight for everything or he gets nothing. Only now we just give girls a leg up and fuck the boys too. When these women find out that it's easier to marry into a wealthy family and suck dick for a living they will ignore their degree and hop into bed with the first semi attractive rich man they can find. Their education is effectively wasted. You don't need to …
/r/MensRights20/08/18 06:43 PM
3

No they're literally saying that it could put them behind bars. As in, giving a false statement to the police, perjuring themselves in court and doing an act intended to pervert the course of justice SHOULD put them behind bars. This is well worth of nottheonion.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:42 AM
2

Doublespeak.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:06 AM
3

It's fucking sad, because you have to know where your kid is to get a custody agreement for the mother to break. If she runs off and disappears before you get one then that's completely legal in the eyes of the law.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 03:54 PM
12

This is done because people want to do it. They decided to do it, they planned to do it, they made it happen then they blamed everyone else for it. Very little happens to the world that is not intentional.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 12:46 AM
1

Look I'm guessing she isn't having sex with any men, we both know it's a lie. That's defamation that is.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 05:22 PM
2

It is fucking lost on me how people who do this wort of thing can get out of prison...
/r/MensRights31/07/18 03:38 AM
1

Is used for mistermeanors not felonies. Although we haven't called them that in decades.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 06:37 PM
1

Yup, they're culpable, but not guilty. It's not a hard concept to get around, it's been law for 700 years. An offence has two components, the act and the mind, both have to be proven beyond doubt to result in a successful conviction.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 05:46 PM
1

Hyperbole doesn't help anyone. Comparing children to women doesn't help either. Sex with minors is ARBITRARILY illegal. There are however certain defences. For example, if someone puts a gun to your head.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:42 PM
1

Just having sex with someone who says they don't consent afterwards is not rape. Rape requires a guilty mind during the act of sex, in order to be convicted. ie, you have to do it intentionally, just like any other crime. This change basically means you don't need a guilty mind to be convicted. Which is absurd and fly's in the face of justice. In the UK if you intoxicate yourself, that's your problem. It doesn't stop you from consenting at all. Regretting doing something when you sober up is ent…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 04:24 PM
1

Rape is the intentionally taking of sex. INTENTIONAL. The defence is often, I believed it was OK because they didn't indicate it wasn't. Now we have a situation were any person, at any time, can say they didn't explicitly say yes and it's automatically rape, with no possibility of a defence. This is a BIG change in the law. A total turn about. And we all know it's going to be used almost exclusively against Men.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 09:45 AM
–

No, you should always be able to confirm, or not, that a child is biologically your own. This isn't about family, it's about nature.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 05:56 PM
4

Bwahahaha. FEELINGS, NOTHING MORE THAN FEELINGS....
/r/MensRights16/07/18 10:10 PM
5

Yes, but it will be years and another government before any of it becomes public policy. Right now I think the government is just trying to look like they're good guys. When in actual fact they're evil as ever.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 03:58 PM
5

I'm thinking the results indicate more about food choices than they do about diabetes. With well payed men making better choices. Eating well, right, and healthy is expensive.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:57 PM
5

Man-spreading is real. It's basically the consequence of having testicles. Fuck Fem's for trying to shame us for it though.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 09:32 AM
2

Automatic? I'm confused, it doesn't say that in the article. Presumably this would require the same procedures as any criminal incitement and 2 years would be a rare sentence. I can see women watching like hawks though. For anything that looks even remotely like up skirting.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:51 PM
15

It's interesting that she notices. Most women seem to be programmed to think that because, ostensibly, to them, men are historically controlling, that they, as women, are free to do anything in return. It's collective punishment, blaming modern men for all the mistakes of history. As if any man ever had that much control, as if modern men are somehow responsible in any case. It's only going to get worst. Sadly.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 07:15 PM
7

Women are the new children.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:06 PM
-1

I'd call it a good start... A proof that it can work and does work. A demonstration that we don't have to be evil to children.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 10:22 PM
–

Yes, for another year or so. :/
/r/MensRights28/05/18 10:16 PM
–

Look at the CIA website, the US is 1st for nothing but wealth. And that doesn't seem to have helped at all. Yes, so california, compared to the netherlands, but compared to germany. And does the size of the nation matter. We all made it work without taking parents from children. It can be done, your solution is not the only way, it's certainly not the moral one. You can't claim the states are different countries but they're a good example of the way you should treat your borders none the less. I…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 10:15 PM
1

No mate, it's not how it work in 1st world countries. I'm in one, that isn't how we and our neighbours do it. You're not in one, America is an ass backwards nation with terrible everything, unless you're rich. Calling it legal is a slippery slope, today it's legal to do it them, tomorrow it'll be legal to do it you. Are you really that short sighted... Will you tail at the alter of legality when they round up more people. Will anyone be left to celebrate when they round you up?
/r/MensRights28/05/18 10:05 PM
-2

No, I leave the back door unlocked and wouldn't take children from their parents under colour of law no matter how much I was payed. I certainly wouldn't try to justify it with terrible comparisons either. I suppose it's only human, people celebrated the brown coats when they started out.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:56 PM
-12

Well no. I can go to 22 countries without needing ID. I can work in them if I use my ID and I can open Bank Accounts and get housing. I can even get state benefits from them. You just want to see the downtrodden at the heel of a boot. Your excuses are transparent. Americans are truly Evil people for doing this to the weakest most underrepresented of any country, the children.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:50 PM
–

No, there is just a place on a map. no one is born illegal. The problem the US has is it's the next fascist state. History tells us that the state will round up a separate anyone they like. What's being done now to immigrants will inevitably be used on citizens. It already is.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:46 PM
-17

By that standard all US people bar the natives are illegals. This isn't a new concept, people migrate, and have done since the beginning of time.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:17 PM
26

Show us your dick or else we convict you. If wrongful conviction isn't force then what is?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:45 PM
2

The problem here is that it's not anti trans, it's anti male genitals, and as is intimate contact, as apposed to making a cake, it's probably actually OK to say no. Otherwise you'd have to do all male genitals like it or not.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 06:34 PM
11

It's highlighting the hypocrisy in the system. The accuser, who very well may have lied, is protected. But the accused, who isn't guilty, is identified and has suffered and will continue to suffer.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 12:31 PM
5

If the police and cps aren't willing to file charges then they're aiding and abetting the corruption. Basically nothing will come of this, because it's failures at every level, every oversight, every official involved, they all perpetuated a lie and knew they were doing it.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 11:18 AM
9

If the police can't police their own they don't have the moral substance to be allowed to police others. This isn't an either or situation. No one is proposing doing away with law enforcement. We want a better law enforcement and we rightly deserve it. The lower echelons care about their wages more than they do a suspects rights. We know this because they must know what's going on and they don't quit.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:58 AM
5

Being a copper is like being an officer of any other business. You job is to create statistics to justify your wages. This is easier to do if you just plain lie about shit. The best performing coppers are the best liars.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 09:29 AM
3

Pretty much admitting here that women get less because they work less.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 03:32 PM
-1

We should be supporting her. We'd support any man who was put through that process unfairly.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 09:35 AM
3

Naked ladies. We can't go wrong with bare naked ladies. I just hope it's the first in a long career... j/k
/r/MensRights11/05/18 09:25 PM
10

I want one right, the right to be offended. Because that way I know I have another right, to speak freely and so would everyone else.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 07:19 PM
1

You can not undo consent if a thing was done only because consent was given.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 10:29 AM
2

In the UK you can have a private prosecution. You can have them in the US also, just because the DA doesn't want to take a case doesn't mean that there is no case.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 01:16 PM
3

Anyone can bring a criminal incitement against anyone. It's not cheap, and the CPS have a duty to take over any case that has merit.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 12:45 PM
2

Private prosecution for perverting the course of justice.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 12:40 PM
5

But the charge was brought by the CPS not the police.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 03:32 PM
70

He's going to get serious dough for the wrongful arrest, unlawful imprisonment and malicious prosecution. But the arrest for Rape will remain on his enhanced disclosure anyway.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 11:06 AM
1

In the UK it's right. There are very few examples for females, but the lesbian couple that had a baby with a donor would be just as screwed as a father if they broke up and had to fight over the child.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 10:23 AM
14

The child has expectations from a father figure... The other parent just manages the money on the child behalf. It's an incredibly unfair system.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:41 PM
14

Typically if you act as a father figure to the child then the child's parent is entitled to child support. As for contact with the child, that's decided either between the parents or if they can't agree between the parents and the courts. It sounds like your friend needs to start family court proceedings for contact. At this point a paternity test isn't useful.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:34 PM
2

Don't understand, some people just go through stuff they can't cope with. This women clearly has reached her limit, good on her for carrying this as far as it can go. Something I learned when I was in counselling, it's OK to be selfish. Sometimes you have to put yourself first.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:59 AM
1

Well they definitely don't care about those. They just lie about the reason why.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 05:17 PM
1

I'm pretty sure a mod/admin can run a subreddit anyway they please and site admins won't do anything to them unless they're blatantly harming reddit in some way.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 04:36 PM
1

They basically admitted to me that it was not a place for free speech and that they would run it how they saw fit. They didn't see it as censorship as it was there's to do with as they pleased.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:45 PM
1

SEX: Male/Female GENDER: Man/Women/Attack Helicopter
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:06 PM
1

The thing is that police in the UK aren't required to search for evidence of innocence, or to acknowledge it. They're only required to do their job which is to turn a detection into conviction. That is how they get paid. All police should now be required to give evidence under affirmation, that way it's perjury if they fail to mention exculpatory details.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 09:42 AM
3

Punishment, I don't think so, I think they will find an excuse to let her off on appeal. She must be crazy right, persecutory delusions and all that.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 06:03 PM
2

Policing is a business and the wrongs that brought about these prosecutions go on everyday as typical conduct for all cases.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 03:49 PM
1

But they didn't, they employed someone to do it for them by proxy.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 03:45 PM
1

Because, and get this, we're all racist sexist bigots. Some of us are in denial, and some of us realise it and do something about it.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 09:54 PM
3

Those who do not seek, shall never find.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:12 PM
3

So she is saying collective punishment is OK if it's too men!
/r/MensRights13/09/17 08:44 AM
7

There are no limitations on when you can be convicted of a crime in the UK. I'd sue her though, take her to the fucking cleaners. And then use that to fund a private prosecution.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 06:40 PM
-1

In law that which is not denied is admitted. The court just have an exparte paper work hearing and grant the applicant whatever they ask for. Now to make a false representation to the court is a crime and he can go back to that case and maybe have it set aside, and reheard.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 05:39 PM
3

Tie a knot in it? These are all choices, people can choose to avoid the craziness.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 07:02 PM
–

No, if you don't want it to happen, don't get married.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 10:14 AM
–

In the UK life means life on parole, minimum of 17 years in a cell in this case, but everyday for the rest of her life she's able to be recalled to prison.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:44 PM
2

The trick is to stop caring what other people think. It's the height of masculinity, who gives a single fuck what other people think of you, just get on getting on.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 07:05 PM
–

Oh I agree it's fucking appalling, but it's also fake. So let's not get wound up about it, we have bigger fish to fry.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 02:26 PM
–

She freely admits it's all fake and she's playing a troll to bring attention to the hypocrisy of it.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 10:48 AM
–

The article still blames patriarchy for men's problems. When will they learn?
/r/MensRights24/03/17 03:05 PM
2

They were never get to get whole of life sentences, but they could each have gotten a few more years for what they did. You're probably right, they got discounts for pleading, but I doubt they will get good behaviour credit while inside for 40% off their sentence.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 02:25 PM
4

The capacity for a barrister to be fully briefed on the details of a case just for cross examination of the accuser is limited. The accused has no such limitation. This directly opposes equality of arms.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 05:31 PM
2

Say good bye to equality of arms.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 05:28 PM
1

NHS staff I can forgive, the system screws them too.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:50 PM
–

Just this subject get's my back up!!!! They really are the worst. Sorry if I come off poorly... Really.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:19 PM
–

They can do exactly three things. Walk to the door, knock on the door, read a caution and leave. Sorry that was four. The home owner can say 'fuck you, leave,' and 'I'm not answering your questions or signing your statement.' And then they must leave. If they remain, if they advise, if they imply or even outright threaten, if they say 'oh well I'll be back' or if they say 'I'm writing here you have a TV', then they're causing harassment, alarm or distress to the home owner and they aught to be c…
/r/MensRights18/01/17 09:08 PM
1

The enforcement of TV licenses in the UK is a racket. They use thugs and liars to target vulnerable people, it is definitely an issue.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:31 PM
–

If you advocated for people then you'd know that using a TV isn't a reason for enforcement. The law required that the TV be used in real time to watch shows as they're broadcast. Just seeing a TV isn't sufficient. Also, enforcement officers aren't authorised to perform surveillance, so they're not legally allowed to look into the window.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:30 PM
–

Have to speak up here. They do target women, it's easier to intimidate them on the door, with threats. Their methods are very much designed to get people to confess. In fact a confession is the only way they can get a conviction. I have had a lot of first hand experience as an advocate for these sorts of cases. They're totally corrupt bastards.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 01:38 PM
6

lol
/r/MensRights18/01/17 01:27 PM
13

They charge with what they could convict. Looks like she is in for several years behind bars. Not a loss by any means.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 08:54 PM
-4

They do though, they deserve to live a long life gasping for air, bones broken, chest crushed, eye's swollen. They do deserve to breathe, just enough to stop them dying.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 11:28 PM
-2

They do though, they deserve to live a long life gasping for air, bones broken, chest crushed, eye's swollen. They do deserve to breathe, just enough to stop them dying.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 11:25 PM
8

It varies really, some people never get released, they're considered to great a danger. I suspect this women will be released, and probably be on quite a long leash. I mean it's not likely she'll get a second similar set of circumstances to go nuts over and murder and she will get plenty of counseling and half way housing.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:00 PM
–

They always have a tariff, in this case 14 years. But Life means literally you're never free again, you will always have a sort of parole officer and can be recalled to prison, subject to raids and searches. Basically just because you're walking around doesn't mean you're free.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 10:37 PM
1

Those engage in risky behaviour aught to be burdened by the outcome. Sex = bad, don't do it!
/r/MensRights30/08/16 09:21 PM
–

No you don't get it, men don't get to decide to have children, women do. If we don't have sex then they can't decide. And less people wouldn't be a bad thing.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 05:18 PM
0

Teaching men not to fuck except under perfect circumstances is a good thing. it's the only tool we have to effecting the problem.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 04:21 PM
–

Don't have sex?
/r/MensRights29/08/16 03:27 PM
7

Only 5 years... I a man had done that it'd be more than double that. Perverting the course of Justice is unlimited sentence and fine.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 10:55 PM
-1

It's not abuse if you consent to it...
/r/MensRights27/08/16 10:51 PM
1

At the point at which a reasonable would believe an item is evidence then it is and tampering with it is a wilful act, thus a crime.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 09:43 PM
2

Amusing.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:37 PM
11

Someone once said that about jailbait.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 05:45 PM
1

Sadly, you can be certain that she consents and still be convicted. So splitting hairs just doesn't get much positivism from this sub.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 03:05 PM
2

I dunno man, a lot can happen in 30 seconds.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 03:02 PM
5

It's a case of belief. If you believe your partner consents then you didn't have a guilty mind. Consent can be communicated many ways, like for example: "Come over and have sex with me".
/r/MensRights27/07/16 03:00 PM
–

Oh yes, penis too. In the UK you don't own your own body, you can't consent to some sado putting nails through your foreskin. Pul the politician can still shit down your throat, and the pm can put his cock in a pigs mouth.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 10:17 PM
–

Actually doing anything that may damage the anus, vagina or breasts is illegal. Images that purport to do that are also illegal, even when faked.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 09:05 PM
3

Except it isn't, sadly, it's a function of law. The law maybe a rights violation but that's different from suffering under the law.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:37 AM
–

As a not gay man I'd be happy too. Never have I had more trouble in a gay bar than from the women in it.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 05:59 PM
1

She's entitle to some part of the common gains they made while they were married. UK law is pretty good, relatively, and rarely awards stupid amounts of money.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 11:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter