TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

oaky180 Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by oaky180 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-5

Someone dresses like they want. "How dare they". Bruh get over yourself
/r/MensRights15/02/26 07:51 PM
59

The dude helped write the Patriot act. That's enough for me to be honest
/r/MensRights12/10/18 06:34 PM
1

If a guy offers to buy something for someone clearly they don't mean it.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:04 PM
1

That's not true. I can't stand it but I know some intelligent people who enjoy it. Why they enjoy it I can only try and understand, but they do anyway
/r/MensRights16/08/18 05:13 PM
1

Who is the feminist trolling? I hope you aren't referring to me. I'm an egalitarian. Not a feminist. It doesn't take a halfway decent person to understand that calling women who accuse someone of sexual harassment whores isn't helping anyone. Instead we should fight for a legal system where men aren't disadvantaged and are able to be seen as innocent until proven guilty. No name calling required
/r/MensRights25/05/18 08:26 PM
7

Wow. And people wonder why no k e takes men's rights activists seriously. Don't call people whores unless they sell their bodies for money
/r/MensRights25/05/18 06:15 PM
-1

It doesn't matter if it is sarcasm or not. If others who haven't formed an opinion of the movement see comments like these they will assume the movement is racist, and not assume you are sarcastic.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 08:05 PM
26

And this is why people don't take the men's rights movement seriously. Keep the hate out of this movement and this sub. There is no place for it here
/r/MensRights14/10/17 07:27 PM
1

That's not true. I managed a date maybe every 2 weeks for a couple months until I met my girlfriend on tinder. Just gotta have good picks and knows what to say
/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:58 PM
5

That's not what this trial was for. This trial was allowing him to essentially defend himself. I hope no one here will argue that he is innocent if he is found guilty against the actual charges that he raped someone, which again, was not this trial.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 12:39 AM
1

That's a saying sure, but then why would we keep anyone in prison on the off chance that they are not guilty?
/r/MensRights24/01/16 12:34 AM
6

OK. Well do you know if bill Cosby was lying? No! He is innocent until proven guilty. Therefore he is innocent right now. An innocent person saying they didn't do it is not lying.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 12:33 AM
1

Oh yeah I definitely meant for consenting adults. Should have been more clear
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:37 AM
1

Now that's something I can get behind. Assuming we had better studies of course. We should be able to make an educated decision
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:28 AM
3

Probably. There needs to be more in biased research in this field for sure based on what I have found
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:22 AM
1

I'm not just picking certain studies to agree with. I'm trying to find both sides. You presented information from only one side so I found some from the other. You can't simply claim every study that you disagree with is a bad study. You can't pick and choose like that. It's not how it works. Edit. And here is a study showing the opposite from my previous study posted. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23374102/ You can't argue that there are different opinions on the matter. Legitimate studi…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:17 AM
1

You're right. Penile cancer is also incredibly rare so that's a horrible example on my part. My bad.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:11 AM
3

I can't understand it either. I feel like it would. However some studies show the opposite. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsm.12293/abstract I'm only wondering how some studies show complete opposite results
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:06 AM
1

Sorry about that, here you go. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsm.12293/abstract
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:04 AM
1

That is true, but can there not be benefits if I choose it myself? If it does actually lower penile cancer like many claim, should we not tell people that? People can have the choice. It helps to know both sides thougb
/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:58 PM
0

I'm not claiming anything at all. And why does where I post something change how it's interpreted? I've grown to like the men's right movement because they tend to more or less look at every side of things. I'm simply showing another point of view. Again, I'm not saying that men should be circumcised. You asked for some studies on the benefits of circumcision which I then presented. It's up to you on how you want to interpret them. You can't deny that many argue for the benefits of circumcision …
/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:57 PM
0

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/6/172 This study was cited saying that it decreases cervical cancer in women. I'm on my phone and can't open it now, but here is one Here is another one stating the lowered risk of hiv. http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(07)60312-2/abstract
/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:42 PM
1

Serious question. Why do I see studies that say that it doesn't decrease sensitivity? Like the one here http://www.m.webmd.com/baby/news/20030430/circumcision-does-not-affect-sensitivity. Are these faulty studies? Here it also states that while complications can occur, it decreases the chance of certain infections that can cause serious problems to both the man and his sexual partner. To me that fact outweighs the chance of a bad circumcision. I'm not trying to say that circumcision shouldn't be…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 09:20 PM
-2

Also these findings assume that circumcision, a socoally accepted act, would bear the same results as other bodily amputations, an assertion that needs further backing. You claim that a man would find it abhorrent? I would say that, at least where I am from, it is more unusual to not be circumcised. Also, you really shouldn't attack an individual. It gives less credit to your argument. And I will be keeping my degree, thank you
/r/MensRights26/06/14 10:44 PM
-2

While it is possible that you can feel distraught over a circumcision you had, I have a hard time believing that it is the circumcision. There are a few examples that come to mind where a person might find some sort of trauma from it. If it was a bad circumcision and caused pain later in life (which is rare and does not justify being so against circumcision). Also, if social stigma existed against circumcision then yeah, it could be a problem. That's not the case though. Every pens displayed out…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 10:33 PM
-2

Yeah pretty much. I don't see myself as harmed personally. For my future kids, ill probably leave it up to the wife. If she doesn't care then we won't do it. I'll agree that it should be left up to the individual person to have it done. I just don't think it is psychologically harmful. I have a degree in psychology and that makes no sense to me
/r/MensRights26/06/14 08:40 PM
-1

I have to disagree. I mean, you can't say that every person doesn't prefer one thing over the other.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:39 PM
-7

I agree with you. I'm happy with my parents decision. It just looks better.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:21 PM
-16

Yeah, it's tough. I mean I'm glad I was circumcised but I would never do it while I was older due to the pain. I have no issue with me being circumcised as a baby though
/r/MensRights26/06/14 05:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter