TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

octalanax Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by octalanax on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Gross.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:19 PM
11

No, men outnumber women on Reddit. The problem is that both men and women favor women. Only a tiny minority of men care about men's issues, and even fewer women give a shit.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 03:35 AM
1

She is committed to unfairness. The idea that she balances the males is invalid, because the males are not committed to male superiority.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 02:32 PM
237

They ALL say that. I have never seen a headline that a woman raped a man.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/10/22 02:54 AM
14

"Men are not owed sex" but "Women are owed marriage". Just more of the double-standards we live under.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 06:28 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 12:50 PM
1

2 factors: imbalance of power and age of consent.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/22 12:45 PM
2

Article is in Spanish.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:37 AM
31

Meh. You have to make a new account every now and then when they notice you're not a drone. Banning just means starting over without your precious "karma" points.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:32 PM
2

Million
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:16 AM
4

Story is missing ALL the critical details. Does not even mention, after a TRIAL, whether he was found guilty or not guilty.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 01:11 PM
1

In a book of literary criticism your notation would be perfectly appropriate. In a straight collection of poems there would be no place for that. And as for historical accuracy, that is always a matter of which facts to select. Did you know that Isaac Newton and Thomas Edison had obnoxious personalities? Would you consider your education incomplete if you did not know that? Of course not. People are known for their achievements. Including irrelevant facts to smear these people is not history; it…
/r/MensRights24/10/22 04:47 PM
2

Unless he's talking about rape or the proper treatment of women, it's irrelevant. Your determination to punish the dead is baffling. Should we discard the Declaration of Independence because of Jefferson's crimes? How much self-abasement or hand-wringing over the past is enough for you? How do you feel about major historical figures such as Alexander the Great, Ghengis Khan, etc? To me their actual achievement is nothing more than bloodshed and mass murder. But I honestly don't care if they pers…
/r/MensRights24/10/22 03:44 PM
2

Seems a little reductionist to summarize a man's achievements by his worst action. Do you want to be remembered only at your worst. Can anyone's life withstand your judgemental scrutiny? This is what's wrong with cancel culture. You mean to conflate the man and his works, and by destroying the man, to destroy his works. The man is long dead and nothing you can do will hurt him or help his victim. All you can do is erase a little bit of history and try to prevent people from benefitting from his …
/r/MensRights24/10/22 12:01 PM
1

He's a dead man. It's too late for him to face justice for the rape. One thing does not excuse the other. But then again, he is also merely a name on a book jacket. I don't celebrate his life and I doubt anyone does. We read his books because they entertain, as well as offer valuable insight into the human condition. I don't need a history lesson on the author's sins before I read their stuff. History does not have room for you to add a disclaimer to every achievement.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 01:28 AM
0

People leave mixed legacies, artists especially. Are we to remember him as a flawed man? Or are we to remember him as a gifted artist? There are millions of rapists, mostly forgotten, like the rest of us, not having left a legacy. There is not time or space in our minds or histories to smear the legacies of those few who left one. Cancel culture is trash, as are those who support it, and those who seek to tear down every accomplishment of dead men.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 12:42 AM
0

How terrible. But his crime does not magically degrade all of his excellent literature.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 12:20 AM
1

In this scenario, SHE is the one sexually harassing the men at her workplace by dressing in a provocative and indecent manner. She feels entitled to their stares but also entitled to resent them for staring.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:40 AM
1

Language control is thought control and it is done for evil purposes. You should have a problem with changing the word.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 08:07 PM
2

Paywall
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/22 01:07 PM
187

"Makes no sense" is practically a requirement for a law to be a law.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 06:45 PM
2

They support violence against men, and they resent you bringing attention to it. Simple as that: they must silence you. To be clear: they are evil and have zero moral restraint from abusing their power.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 04:30 AM
8

Sure. AOC is well known for respecting men and being able to see both sides of issues. /eyeroll
/r/MensRights01/10/22 03:36 AM
30

In reality it is rape. But in Britain the law says a woman cannot rape a man. For real.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 12:09 AM
1

It's outside the Overton Window, so people refuse to think about or even acknowledge the idea of legal paternal surrender. We're so used to men having no rights that it is inconceivable that they should.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 03:48 AM
66

It's like slavery, but worse, because with slaves the masters wanted to keep them alive and productive. With conscription, the masters want to send you into combat and get you killed!
/r/MensRights24/09/22 05:48 PM
4

You might inform your interlocutor thusly: Patriarchy is a figment of your imagination, merely an accumulation/reservoir of all the things you consider "badness." Your entire feminist movement depends upon false claims of victimhood, when you are a member of the most-protected and most-celebrated group in the history of the world: women. If "men are victims too" then why does your movement always ignore and downplay the suffering of men? And when it comes to actual policy, why does your movement…
/r/MensRights24/09/22 12:53 PM
6

I hear you. Personally I think the whole concept of race is outmoded and should be eliminated. But instead we're in a world of racial preferences and promotion. If everyone else gets a race, I need one too.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/22 11:54 AM
43

Every other race is expected to be proud and aware. The white race is instead told to be ashamed at best, but more usually that it simply doesn't exist. Racial justice is just revenge, apparently.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/22 11:24 AM
13

They don't always say abortion, but when they do, they call it "health care."
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/22 09:50 PM
104

Because there was too much justice in our farcical legal judicial system, we have had to set up a second tier at the collegiate level, where defendants are presumed guilty and somehow have even fewer legal rights.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 02:43 AM
4

Very impressive. Thank you for sharing. What has been done to American fathers is an unspeakable injustice, and continues to get worse every day.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:13 AM
1

Style editor has built-in "women are wonderful" effect: female (even with penis) does something good: "call it woman" same does something bad: "call it person" male does something good: "call it person" male does something bad: "call it a man"
/r/MensRights17/09/22 03:44 PM
7

Look I like offensive language as much as the next guy, but I try to use it intentionally. As opposed to just being completely unaware of how times have changed, and how babes are no longer called broads.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/22 01:32 AM
1

Nope the movie was by Cassie Jaye.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/22 01:31 AM
5

This long-haired person has oppressed me by expressing an opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/22 01:36 AM
13

Because men's actual lives matter. Not just their sperm. We're not just a breeding project, and eugenics has been discredited.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 05:40 AM
4

How does she even know they are men? Just because they have penises? Sounds like she is a year or two behind on her wokeness.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 01:12 PM
2

Because strong independent wahmen get their feelings hurt extremely easily if anyone disagrees with the hivemind.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 01:52 AM
16

Apex fallacy. Just because a few men are at the top does NOT mean that all men are at the top.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 01:15 AM
100

According to feminism, women are just men with boobs. I am very attracted to femininity, which is mostly dead now. I am not at all attracted to men with boobs.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/22 11:29 PM
40

Men earn; women spend. Simple and timeless.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:19 PM
2

Sure. Western culture is based on certain shared beliefs, such as the importance of freedom, honesty, individual rights, family, the judeo-Christian ethic, private property, etc. Marxism stands absolutely opposed to all these concepts. Marxism is not simply an economic revolt against the excesses of capitalism; it is an attempt to supplant and subvert Western culture. So as Marxists seize control over institutions, they gradually erode each of these foundational principles, weakening our beliefs…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:35 AM
8

You should see the Wikipedia article on Cultural Marxism. The term "Cultural Marxism" refers to a far-right antisemitic conspiracy theory which claims that Western Marxism is the basis of continuing academic and intellectual efforts to subvert Western culture. Honest and unbiased, right? No. If you're expecting a shred of honor and integrity from Wikipedia, you've gone to the wrong place.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:05 AM
3

Well he hurt her feelings, right? That is the worst crime in western society.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 02:15 AM
2

Scaphism
/r/MensRights26/08/22 01:05 PM
15

First date is coffee or a walk. Not spending for a fancy dinner. This one is a gold-digger all the way.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/22 02:43 AM
4

They are both issues of sexual sin that "Church Inc." exploits for fun and profit. Very closely related when you think of them that way.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:10 AM
6

You basically have to have a separate account for each subreddit you participate in. The hivemind enforcers have bots that check your comment history and ban you if you participate in the badthink subreddits. It's simple censorship and thought control. Evil and banal.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 03:08 AM
1

It is known. Because the average man earns more than the average woman, this justifies hatred and discrimination against every man. Hatred is basically the bloodsport of Reddit. They just pretend otherwise by protecting certain privileged groups.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:32 AM
277

"Have you tried being rich, tall, popular, and attractive?" Hey that's good advice! Why didn't I think of that?
/r/MensRights20/08/22 04:49 AM
5

Can I identify as a woman without making any lifestyle changes? Like, say, can I get preferential job placement and pay without having to take hormones, wear a dress, or cut off my dick?
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:40 AM
1

Feminist cinema? You mean whining and man-hating? Doesn't sound like fun to me.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 12:53 AM
2

Job postings always used to say ( equal opportunity / affirmative action ) as if we were too stupid to realize that was a contradiction.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 12:27 AM
5

You are exactly correct. The other half of my job was spreadsheets.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 06:22 PM
6

Male disposability of chickens continues into adult breeding farms. The breeding males are a different breed than the female line. But because sexing after hatch is imperfect, a flock of 10,000 females will have up to 100 unwanted males of the female breed line. During their adult life, someone has to find and cull (strangle) those males. Source: this was my job.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 12:13 PM
2

Well you've certainly succeeded in keeping it vague. "Something once happened to someone." Boom! Doxxed.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/22 11:37 PM
1

You're thinking of mods. Admins are (over)paid Reddit employees in charge of enforcing the censorship regime.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 03:35 PM
3

Men care about their children just as much as women, and codifying male disposability is a grave injustice.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:31 AM
2

Sure. If you say so. The law is written "gender-neutral" but the lived experience of millions of men is that it is applied unequally.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 04:21 PM
9

The best part is the reasoning behind alimony: Her support was necessary for you to earn what you do. So it's only fair that you reimburse her for her contribution to your career. Except that now that she has withdrawn her support, how can you continue earning that much without her? The whole thing makes no sense. Either her support was necessary, in which case you fall apart without her and your earnings collapse. Or her support was NOT necessary and she is NOT entitled to a permanent share of …
/r/MensRights01/08/22 02:39 AM
2

I judge your comment to be misinformation, thus you should be banned. Do you see the problem with that? Hint: it has to do with who will watch the watchers.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 05:55 PM
7

You are going through a LOT of explication to distinguish a fetus from a person. In other words, you recognize that killing a person is wrong. Also bringing up ectopic pregnancies is a simple self-defense issue, unrelated to "abortion as convenience." Anyone has a right to kill someone that is killing them. Women are different from men. (There, that is enough to get me banned from Reddit.) Women have the special privilege of nurturing and creating new life. The only reason abortion is even consi…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 04:46 AM
34

My last account was banned for noticing that Elliott Page is a fraud. Person needs proper mental health care instead of pandering to their dysphoria. I have no doubt that this post will be removed since biological reality is now against Reddit policy.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 04:18 AM
7

Roe v Wade has to do with whether the federal government has the right to prevent individual States from defining when life begins. Half the country literally believes that life begins at conception. So the issue is whether abortion is murder or not. If it's not, then it should be unrestricted. If it is, then it should be punished as such. It has nothing to do with women's rights. Women do not have any right to commit murder. In this post regarding women's special privileges, your comment is a p…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 04:10 AM
9

Child support is "woman support" by another name. Also you are tragically correct that marital obligations attach to a man even when he has never agreed to a marriage contract.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:43 AM
15

Neither is my ex-wife.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:43 PM
35

This is how it is. But it is actually WORSE than a one-sided contract. It is a contract you can NEVER get out of. Even after divorce, you can still be obligated to pay alimony and child-support permanently. Her obligations (as if any ever existed) die with the divorce, but yours never do.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:16 PM
1

Nope. But I read it just now since you challenged me. Basic blather as expected. Would not have changed my response any.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 10:40 PM
1

Hmm. They have paint-shakers at every hardware store. That is where the baby-shaker's head belongs.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 05:07 AM
2

Good job trying.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 04:51 AM
12

It sure is awful when men find women attractive, or worse yet, express that they find a woman attractive. But we have solutions! First off, make women as unattractive as possible. Destroy femininity; promote feminism and lesbianism. Secondly, criminalize approaching women. No woman should ever have to put up with hearing a man tell her she is beautiful and he would like to provide for her.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 03:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter