TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

off_da_grid Archive

View 2 posts and 66 comments by off_da_grid on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Ruin the lives of young men how? This only pertains to Congress, which is old as fuck.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 08:07 AM
1

Posted it on my Facebook. Positive responses for the most part thus far :)
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:24 AM
1

The still is misleading. Track down the clip. Just youtube antifa girl punched or something.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 12:43 PM
2

I watched the video. She didn't hit him first. He had his hand cocked and punched her. Mid punch she grabbed his collar.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 10:44 PM
1

Except if you can't afford a Ferrari you can just buy a cheaper car. If you can't afford an abortion, your life is fucked and you're bringing a child into a struggling resentful family to become a financial burden. I... fail to see the similarities.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 10:27 PM
2

"abortion is a way for women to choose not to become parents once they become pregnant. In this vein, men do not have the same right or privilege, irrespective of their biology." I can agree with that. Women certainly have more options when it comes to choosing/opting out of parenthood. And lots of options isn't a bad thing. The answer isn't to take away women's options, it's to give men more options (fingers crossed for male birth control pill and financial abortion in the future). On the same …
/r/MensRights17/04/17 02:37 PM
1

I don't. I was illustrating that just as MRAs often see feminist issues as minor and not worth attention, feminists see men's rights issues as minor and not worth attention. It's not a zero sum game.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:42 PM
1

I never said women are being denied a right that men have. That's not the definition of oppression (not that I'm sold that denying abortion is oppression anyway). Men don't have that right because men CAN'T have that right. It's biologically impossible. How is that a privilege? Are prostate exams a male privilege? Are testicles dangling between men's legs a male privilege? Men and women are different and require different healthcare. It's not oppression or privilege. It's biology. And driving is…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:38 PM
1

Was this in response to me? I'm so confused. Where did I ever say that anything wasn't up for debate?
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:04 PM
1

"That's my point. Men have no equivalent right to not become parents." Correct. Men can't stop a woman from having a child. Men have their reproductive organs, women have theirs. They're not the same. Life's not fair. Financial abortions are the closest thing men have, and I completely support them. "how does not wanting to pay for someone else's procedure mean its made illegal?" Like I said, while it's not technically illegal, it can be behind a paywall not accessible to most people. That's wha…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:03 PM
-1

And that's exactly what they think about men and men's relatively minor issues.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:37 AM
7

I support "parental abortion" as well. You can be in favor of both, you know. I know many feminists shit on men while clamoring for abortion rights, but put your hate aside for a moment. Don't be like them.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:29 AM
1

Many people, including many politicians, want abortions to be illegal. And regardless of your view on the issue, making abortions a lot more expensive means many women won't have access to them anymore. Those are facts, in case you're wondering "what're they complaining about?"
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:18 AM
1

What equivalent right? And while abortion is still legal, there is constantly a lot of talk about making it illegal. And removing funding from abortion providers can close down clinics and skyrocket costs for those seeking the procedure. I believe it's anywhere from $300-$1000. If you're poor, it might as well be illegal, because you can't afford it anyway.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:02 AM
2

I mean... you could say being denied the right to an abortion is oppression of sorts.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 07:54 AM
12

While arguable if a right or not, there is one thing I support feminism in, and that's abortion rights. I know there's no male equivalent, and the ethics can be disputed, but there's undoubtedly constant conflict about this issue.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 07:20 AM
2

I guess I base that off of government representatives, not the populous itself. I feel like every republican candidate feels the need to pander to anti-vaxxers by touting the "Too many vaccines too fast! Doctors are lying! You don't need all that!" horseshit. As a healthcare professional I can't in good conscience support idiocy like this.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:50 PM
6

Liberal leftist here. I just cannot support the climate change denying anti vaxxer right.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 07:17 AM
3

I don't get it. Sure there are lots of crazies in there, but they have a few valid complaints. Cutting government funding for abortions means many won't be able to afford them anymore. Say what you want about pro life/pro choice debate, but this is clearly a massive hit for anyone seeking an abortion. They have every right to be upset.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 08:19 AM
1

Wrong. 2013
/r/MensRights23/05/16 07:59 AM
3

This is really old. Why are you bringing this up yet again.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 07:58 AM
4

Abortion rights are one of the few legitimate issues feminism is fighting for. If that quote of Bernie is true, I don't agree with the way he framed it, but I do agree with abortion rights. It's not a man vs woman thing. It's a religion vs woman thing. This does not change the fact that reforming the draconian prison system will overwhelmingly benefit men.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:07 AM
2

The only candidate who has come close to addressing men's issues is Bernie with his emphasis on prison reform and releasing many nonviolent criminals, which are almost entirely men.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 07:13 AM
1

There's not a major outcry and there shouldn't be one. I know you're just pointing out the hypocrisy, but it's not like this is the first time babies have been killed in GoT. I believe somewhere in the first couple seasons someone orders a baby to be killed with a dagger in Little Finger's brothel. And I don't think "nobody cares because it was a boy." I think nobody cares because it happened quickly, off screen, and it was a baby. Maybe it's just me, but I don't feel for babies as much as I do …
/r/MensRights02/05/16 08:22 PM
0

This is old data
/r/MensRights23/04/16 08:05 AM
2

9% of suicides by immolation!? What the fuck!? Why would you choose to go out in the most agonizing way imaginable? The fuck is wrong with you, India.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 10:03 AM
6

Men PERIOD are much more likely to commit suicide. Much more than twice in the US anyway. I don't know if that's the case in India. I get the feeling it probably is. In which case this story is misleading.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 04:08 AM
7

You won't find any candidate speaking openly for men's rights. It just ain't gonna happen. Having said that, I like Bernie a lot and am planning on voting for him. One of the biggest issues he's fighting for is reducing the huge prison population and letting out those in for minor/nonviolent crimes/etc. And nearly all of them are... surprise surprise.. men. I think Bernie comes closer to dealing with male issues than the other candidates.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 07:27 AM
1

This is absolutely wrong. You should never back down from an opportunity to debate/try to explain your views to an opponent. Refusing to debate is exactly what the feminists do, and it's a HUGE thing we criticize them for. Refusing to debate shows weakness, that you can't defend your positions. Don't be like them. The facts are on your side.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 04:49 PM
35

... it sounds like you're trying to justify equating two different standards of data. Listen, your infographic is good and has a good point. Even if you fix your data to say 91% you'll still have a good point because the facts are on our side. You don't NEED to twist the numbers around to support your cause like the feminists often do. That's what we often criticize them of. Don't sink to their level. Respect the study.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:56 AM
39

Where are you getting your statistics? I simply googled "contraception failure rates" and got different numbers. Here is a good source. https://www.arhp.org/Publications-and-Resources/Quick-Reference-Guide-for-Clinicians/choosing/failure-rates-table Looks like you might be comparing "perfect use" of female contraceptives to "typical use" of condoms. Typical use of the pill actually gives you about 91% success rate.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:16 AM
1

Downvoted for saying you can appreciate the sacrifices of both parents without belittling one side. Fucking stunning.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 06:33 AM
0

Wow. No. I'm not even a parent and I know it's no walk in the park. In a "stay at home mom/dad works" situation both parents make significant sacrifices. Mothers get no sleep, do backbreaking work, and deal with literal shit piss and puke day in and day out. Don't belittle their work, please. You can still appreciate the father without doing so.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 07:40 AM
1

Theon's penis was not fed to him. It's implied that it was sent to his father.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 08:18 AM
2

It wasn't even a disagreement, I would say. He wasn't debating her on anything. Unless that something was "can I be here? Y/N"
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:39 AM
6

But teaching communication and journalism IS her job. If she's so incredibly inept at communication and has such contempt for journalism, how is she qualified to teach?
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:10 AM
0

She definitely shouldn't go to jail. She didn't do anything violent. Even calling it "assault" seems like a stretch. But she SHOULD lose her job seeing as how she was acting like a colossal cunt and making a mockery of communication as a professor of communication.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:07 AM
1

Oh daaaaamn, son! Sick argument. Jesus, is this how all mgtow are?
/r/MensRights18/01/16 02:44 AM
0

"Pussies can't handle the truth about females." Try switching a couple words and you get "neckbeards can't handle the truth about males." Do you not see how that sounds? It's like the red pill invaded this sub or something. Threads like these are what makes MRAs look bad.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 06:13 AM
-3

eye roll No. I'm not a journalist. I'm someone who works with nothing but women day in and day out. And yes, you said many women don't know how to work in teams, etc. I'm sorry for misquoting your sentence, but I don't believe I took it out of context. Your first sentence implies that you can't find an office without problematic women in it. "how can anyone who has worked in an office or a group with women actually believe this." Believe it or not, the women I work with get shit done. I'm in pha…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:35 PM
0

I'm not sure what you mean here. More powerful if the viewer could see the double standard on their own? Do you mean to provide examples? If so, it would be hard to provide examples for this one. It's more of a trend than a single case. There are hundreds of female only spaces and no male only spaces so. ... How do you concisely show this in a graphic? It's not like anyone has done a study on this.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 11:40 AM
-6

It kind of sounds like you're saying they're inferior. "Women don't know how to work in teams. They cause and escalate conflicts." How is this different from what Hillary is saying? "Women listen better, come up with better ideas" etc. We should stay away from such broad generalizations.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 07:41 AM
3

You're a good artist. I like these. Nice line work and expressions.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 08:06 AM
1

Less than a thousand dollars off. We got this :)
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:55 AM
5

Note I said her being a woman plays no part in THIS specific piece. Her being a woman very well may have helped her garner the attention and funding, but she's not playing that card here. Nor should we automatically assume the worst of her and put words in her mouth.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:11 AM
1

Nice talking to you too, little buddy :)
/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:56 AM
4

Again. This in no way "celebrates porn as long as it's made by a woman." It celebrates a specific kind of porn and condemns another, but her being a woman plays no part in the piece.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:07 AM
14

I think you guys are off base here. I don't see where she says porn made by guys is bad and porn made by girls is good. She's a proponent of hyper-realistic affectionate porn and an opponent of hardcore porn. Unless you guys think the only porn guys make is hardcore and the only porn girls make is realistic and affectionate. Not my thing, but whatever floats her boat. The only gendered thing she says is a jab at Heffner and his bunnies. Which is weird considering Playboy is the most softcore shi…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:32 AM
1

Present ourselves well to the general public, yes. Regardless of what the title is, feminist publications (which the general public reads) will say the movie is terrible. If the title is TRP the publications will say "See? Men's Rights is in love with PUAs like the idiots who boycott Mad Max. They're one and the same." The general public will raise their eyebrows, google "The Red Pill" and "PUA" and sure enough will see the subreddit and such. That'll turn a lot of people off and they won't watc…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 11:23 PM
2

MGTOW ignores the influences of the world and does whatever it wants. Nothing wrong with that, but from what I understand it cares nothing for making any change, for improving anything. Campaigning for change requires public support. And, big surprise, public support requires that you present yourself well. PR matters. Don't go into an interview wearing a tie dye t shit and then complain when the guy in suit and tie gets the job and you don't. Because "fuck the man," right?
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:39 PM
5

I don't think Cassie originally being a feminist will matter to them. As soon as she gives the MRM a platform she's as good as dead in their eyes. No longer a feminist. You're either with us, or you're against us. Just like Christina Hoff Sommers.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 12:09 PM
7

Credibility won't matter. It hasn't mattered so far. Anita has zero idea what she's talking about, and yet she's invited to Google, TED, the UN, Colbert, and every publication worships her. When the feminists smear this film without having seen it, nobody except a select few people will criticize them for it. The public takes feminists at their word.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 10:05 AM
4

Despite the unfortunate title, I'm still planning on backing this in the next day or two. Want to watch it with the gf to show her MRAs aren't psychos
/r/MensRights08/11/15 09:52 AM
7

People whose blood boils when they hear TRP will not be seeing this movie. I can guarantee you that. Feminists don't look deeper into things that make them angry. They completely avoid them.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:45 AM
2

Did she say women make 16% less!? does a double-take I mean.. It's still bullshit, but it's fucking leaps and bounds more accurate than 70 cents on the dollar or whatever. Oh wait.. Not a real campaign video. Is it real audio though? Did she really say 16%?
/r/MensRights07/11/15 04:12 PM
1

Yes she is (or was) a feminist, and this is marketed towards feminists and regular people so they learn more about the MRM. But if you know anything about feminists, they will refuse to see anything that is even ironically tinged with something they don't agree with. Many feminists agree that men have a lot of issues they deal with. But presenting something to a feminist you have to be extremely.. and I mean fucking EXTREMELY careful in how you present your message. Feminists will NOT see a movi…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 12:36 AM
1

I don't think men's rights needs a hook to get attention. The concept of men's rights is so out of the norm that it will be plenty controversial on that alone.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 12:23 AM
2

I feel like the mere concept of men's rights is plenty controversial on its own and will rustle plenty of jimmies. Not all publicity is good publicity.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 12:16 AM
2

Feminists don't even have to do anything. Imagine you've never heard of the MRM or TRP or anything like that. Then you hear somewhere that there's this interesting new documentary about men's rights called The Red Pill and it's very controversial. Okay. So you google "the red pill." Go ahead. Google it. See what comes up. 1st result, the TRP subreddit. You're automatically turned off. 2nd result, "it's time for reddit to flush the red pill". Turned off. 3rd result, "What is the red pill? Interne…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 11:34 PM
3

True. I wish the title was different.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 11:11 PM
4

Huh. This seems to have everything I wanted to know. Apparently the term "the red pill" was used by the MRM years before the subreddit, and most importantly the documentary will address this exact fact and the common conflations of the two. That's all anyone could ask for.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 10:42 PM
2

Hm.. How old is that subreddit anyway?
/r/MensRights01/11/15 10:33 PM
1

I dont think these are in any way similar. The ISIS dildo flag was making fun of ISIS and was simply silly. Yes the media made a stupid snap judgement, but if all of a sudden the lgbt community decided to adopt the ISIS dildo flag as representing the movement or if Trump made a logo very similar to ISIS but was made out of money or something, they'd be the stupid ones, wouldn't they. This isn't a matter of freedom of speech. This isn't gamergate. Gamergate never stood for misogyny from day 1, an…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 10:32 PM
3

You're getting mad that people associate a men's rights documentary titled "the red pill" with a subreddit with the exact same title that is commonly (if erroneously) associated with men's rights? If you find me calmly asking this question frustrating, you cannot imagine what you're in for when this actually comes out. This is the first thing every single media outlet will pounce on, and they won't be wrong in doing so. The "oh, we have the same exact name, and we're always in the news together,…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:43 PM
1

I'm well aware that it was a thing in the Matrix and you see the harsh reality and so on. But to my knowledge the first and only group to adopt this monicker was the TRP subreddit. And that's all the world sees from now on. And all they will ever see when they hear "The Red Pill." It's like stormfront. Try as you might, you're not gonna make a teddy bear-making company named "Stormfront" without attracting questions about white supremacy. Is this documentary supposed to be a "We're taking it bac…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:39 PM
2

It doesn't? Is that not its origin?
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter