oheysup Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	This article sums up why so many men are angry about Gillette's ad perfectly, in my view it should be spread far and wide and used to rebut any of the usual "if you're upset, you're part of the problem" bullshit guilty Guilty of animosity towards the entire gender.... Determined by who? Projecting fake scenarios and getting triggered by them seems to be super common here. I guess it makes sense there's a lot of overlap here and /r/t_d	/r/MensRights	21/01/19 02:38 AM
-1	This article sums up why so many men are angry about Gillette's ad perfectly, in my view it should be spread far and wide and used to rebut any of the usual "if you're upset, you're part of the problem" bullshit Rough play is entirely different than bullying. Rewatch the video because your entire post is you projecting yourself being triggered by a very simple, good message.	/r/MensRights	19/01/19 08:29 PM
-2	This article sums up why so many men are angry about Gillette's ad perfectly, in my view it should be spread far and wide and used to rebut any of the usual "if you're upset, you're part of the problem" bullshit The problem is you're falsely stating that the ad targeted all men. Yes an ad about stopping women who abuse their children would be acceptable as well.	/r/MensRights	19/01/19 03:16 AM
1	This article sums up why so many men are angry about Gillette's ad perfectly, in my view it should be spread far and wide and used to rebut any of the usual "if you're upset, you're part of the problem" bullshit You need unambiguous reassurance to not make unfounded projections of the message of an advert?	/r/MensRights	19/01/19 02:14 AM
1	This article sums up why so many men are angry about Gillette's ad perfectly, in my view it should be spread far and wide and used to rebut any of the usual "if you're upset, you're part of the problem" bullshit targeting women It's targeting toxic actions by men, not all men. Did you read my reply at all?	/r/MensRights	18/01/19 09:54 PM
1	This article sums up why so many men are angry about Gillette's ad perfectly, in my view it should be spread far and wide and used to rebut any of the usual "if you're upset, you're part of the problem" bullshit Terry crews has specifically talked about his muscles and body have nothing to do with masculinity. The rest of your post completely misses/ignores the point as well. I know some of this subreddit has twisted views about what they think masculinity means but you should read more about Terry crews. This is literally an ad about not harassing women or letting your children bully and somehow they interpret it as a direct attack on their "masculinity" and telling them to cut their dicks off and "be …	/r/MensRights	17/01/19 10:20 PM
-12	This article sums up why so many men are angry about Gillette's ad perfectly, in my view it should be spread far and wide and used to rebut any of the usual "if you're upset, you're part of the problem" bullshit Right, because it's an ad about men. Your point? I read what he said just fine but feel free to articulate how I'm wrong.	/r/MensRights	17/01/19 07:48 PM
-15	This article sums up why so many men are angry about Gillette's ad perfectly, in my view it should be spread far and wide and used to rebut any of the usual "if you're upset, you're part of the problem" bullshit No it didn't at all. It associated toxic masculinity with toxic masculinity. It in no way implies all men are tocix, all men are masculine, all masculinity is toxic, or any of the sort. The fact terry fucking crews, one of the most masculine men there is, is shown supporting the movement blows your entire conspiracy theory out of the water. Your second paragraph is just absurd, the count of clips in the video is irrelevant to the message. Typically, when discussing a topic, the videos that go wi…	/r/MensRights	17/01/19 07:13 PM
-17	This article sums up why so many men are angry about Gillette's ad perfectly, in my view it should be spread far and wide and used to rebut any of the usual "if you're upset, you're part of the problem" bullshit It's actually saying most men are good, and asking that those good men that don't take action should be more proactive. It makes zero generalizations about men as a sex. Similar to mlk jrs letter to Birmingham, where seemingly good people (white moderates) were inactive and opposed action - leading mlk Jr to believe the white moderate was more of a problem than the literal ku klux klan when looking at fighting systemic racism.	/r/MensRights	17/01/19 06:33 PM