TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

oied Archive

View 1 post and 87 comments by oied on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
45

oied/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:20 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

clearly everything bad is caused by patriarchy and white men
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:00 PM
7

why do you think men are underrepresented in legal matters? a figured it wasn't a representation issue but a bias issue men receive more severe sentences than women for the same crime
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:29 PM
26

for some reason no one else decided to help either
/r/MensRights24/06/13 09:09 PM
1

yea, thats the benefit TEDx provides, you pay them to use their name and website
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:36 PM
2

The income gap between the two groups is quite large. The median total family income of married mothers who earn more than their husbands was nearly $80,000 in 2011, well above the national median of $57,100 for all families with children, and nearly four times the $23,000 median for families led by a single mother.2
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:24 PM
53

there's a difference between TED and TEDx the TEDx program is designed to give communities, organizations and individuals the opportunity to stimulate dialogue through TED-like experiences at the local level. TEDx events are fully planned and coordinated independently, on a community-by-community basis
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:16 PM
2

TEDX has always been a joke
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:05 PM
26

These “breadwinner moms” are made up of two very different groups: 5.1 million (37%) are married mothers who have a higher income than their husbands, and 8.6 million (63%) are single mothers.1 Of all households with children younger than 18, the share of married mothers who out-earn their husbands has gone up from 4% in 1960 to 15% in 2011. During the same period, the share of families led by a single mother (from 7% to 25%). more single mothers = more women as the primary/sole breadwinners
/r/MensRights29/05/13 03:06 PM
1

reverse racism is pretty common in liberal places
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:42 AM
-1

its not supposed to be logical, its meant to appeal to feminists
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:34 AM
0

it shows that gender rolls are socially constructed and oppressive to both men and women and none are stronger or better than the other can you prove this?
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:03 PM
4

declining population is only a problem if they use a social security scheme
/r/MensRights25/05/13 03:12 AM
8

is it a problem that they aren't getting married?
/r/MensRights24/05/13 04:23 PM
1

join the army?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 07:58 PM
1

then people should donate if they want to help, if they dont then clearly forcing them to isnt the right option
/r/MensRights23/05/13 07:12 PM
1

what costs are imposed on society by allowing a father to opt out?, all the costs would just be on the mother
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:14 PM
2

In the instance of abortion - there is no child. and in the instance of a father opting out he is abandoning a fetus, not a child after he opts out the child would no longer be his legally, thus he isnt abandoning his child
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:10 PM
1

The cost is imposed on others either way a cost doesn't have to be imposed on society, the welfare state is perpetuated when the government decides to impose costs onto every individual, instead of who it should be placed on
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:48 PM
1

No, the father is choosing to abandon the child by that logic the woman is choosing to murder the child by having an abortion I do not think he can walk away from his responsibility to the welfare of the child. and i dont think a woman can walk away from the welfare of a child either, by having an abortion the woman is destroying the child's future
/r/MensRights23/05/13 07:18 AM
2

some parents do, didn't some woman drown her kids to do that basically?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 07:16 AM
2

If the mother DOESN'T want to opt out, but cannot support the child herself, are we to tell her "welp, sucks for you and the kid?" the people that want to assist could donate to charity to help her and her child out, or just remove the kid from her like social services would do No, the biological parents don't have an obligation because someone else has legally agreed to take that obligation. as would be the case with the father opting out, the mother legally took all obligation The reasoning be…
/r/MensRights23/05/13 05:02 AM
2

Again, you are not even considering the rights of the child what rights specifically are you talking about? One is ensuring the child never exists, the other is abandoning a child that does (or rather, will). again, the mother is choosing to raise the child alone
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:58 AM
3

That's not the decision except it is The cost is imposed on others either way only if you want to perpetuate the welfare state
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:49 AM
0

so limiting a man's freedom so he cant opt out is wrong?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:48 AM
2

why is it more fair? what is the problem of allowing the father to opt out while she is pregnant (and still able to have an abortion) what is your stance on adoption, do the biological still have an obligation to the child after its been adopted by another family? if not, then why?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:42 AM
2

what makes limiting one freedom okay and another not okay?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:36 AM
2

The problem is that it doesn't take into account the rights and welfare of the child which will arrive how so? It also sets the precedent that parents have no obligation to their children - which is problematic in a lot of ways. parents would have obligations past the opt out point during pregnancy The other issue (and the lesser one IMO as the child's welfare is paramount) is that for the majority of women who become pregnant abortion is not the right choice what is the right choice and why? It…
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:31 AM
1

correct, so what makes one right and one wrong? is the goal to maximize utility for society?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:25 AM
2

still not seeing the problem of allowing the father to opt out while she is pregnant (and still able to have an abortion)
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:21 AM
2

the mother would be consenting to raise that child on her own by not choosing to get an abortion when the father opts out what is the problem with that?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:09 AM
3

i simply asked questions, i didn't say to stop people form having children, just pointing out the contradictions of not allowing men to opt out We cannot control the physical freedom of people by telling them they cannot have children because they're poor but you do limit the freedom of people by telling them they can't opt out of being a parent
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:03 AM
2

yep, why should we impose costs onto everyone and not just the parents?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:42 AM
2

The consequence of allowing a parent to opt out is (potential) hardship placed on the child. such as? should we allow low income couples have kids? they have objective hardships placed on a child. how far do you want to take it? where do you draw the arbitrary line and why? are single women/men allowed to adopt children? how would that differ from a father opting out and the mother raising the child alone?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:32 AM
1

what specifically are the consequences of letting fathers opt out?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:21 AM
1

ya, they just have to discriminate in a less obvious way its pretty stupid for the government to enforce that anyways
/r/MensRights23/05/13 02:37 AM
9

out of curiosity, why do they include people over 16 (the age of consent in BC) in the study? there legally allowed to consent to have sex, but not if they are getting something out of it? "many didn't seem aware that they had been exploited" this always makes me laugh
/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:29 AM
1

only one of the girls said she didn't like any body hair too
/r/MensRights22/05/13 11:53 PM
1

women in lower income countries usually, and more traditional families
/r/MensRights22/05/13 09:46 PM
1

local quality i guess
/r/MensRights22/05/13 09:39 PM
1

not necessarily an issue besides them being less desirable
/r/MensRights22/05/13 09:32 PM
3

there is no issue, a company should be able to hire anyone if it wants, if it wants to discriminate based on gender let it, the companies that hire based on merit will drive them out of business
/r/MensRights22/05/13 09:21 PM
4

what is the issue here? seems like mens rights is turning even more like feminism
/r/MensRights22/05/13 09:17 PM
3

that's a problem with multiculturalism, not feminism unless you want to show some stronger connection, like feminism and liberalism being tied and leading to poor economic and immigration decisions
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:22 PM
0

children of what age? what age is he supposed to be in the show?
/r/MensRights22/05/13 02:38 AM
-1

hahaha ok??? the age of consent varies greatly from country to country, jews consider 13 year old boys to be men dont they?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 10:49 PM
2

whats the issue?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:58 PM
-1

Yes and no, at the time no but after with the regret it looks like it is. hahaha thank you
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:51 PM
-1

depends on the culture
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:50 PM
-5

no im saying the fact that he didn't say anything at all once she started touching him adds to the fact that he probably enjoyed it, based on everything they showed previously he was just afraid of his step mom and what she would do
/r/MensRights21/05/13 07:07 PM
-8

what country is the judge in? im not arguing the legality if it were to take place in the US i am merely pointing out why i didnt see it as rape
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:26 PM
-5

at what age can someone consent to something? he seemed capable of saying no right after she touched him
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:19 PM
-14

he didn't seem too young to consent, he was aroused, and he stopped protesting very quickly, his resistance seems based on the fact that he knew his step mom would beat him if she found out
/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:43 PM
-10

didn't see it as rape at all
/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:36 PM
1

another pointless class
/r/MensRights21/05/13 04:15 PM
2

almost http://www.tomwagnerphoto.com/pics/story07/index.html
/r/MensRights18/05/13 09:54 PM
2

Cytotec is potentially fatal?
/r/MensRights18/05/13 05:14 PM
-5

i would put it on the same level as a women getting an abortion without the mans consent/despite his disagreement
/r/MensRights18/05/13 07:26 AM
0

he knew about the scam, aided the guy in trying to raise money and then revealed it was a scam after everyone already figured it out
/r/MensRights17/05/13 09:08 PM
-3

didn't you hear? ADHD is a fictitious disease http://www.worldpublicunion.org/2013-03-27-NEWS-inventor-of-adhd-says-adhd-is-a-fictitious-disease.html
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:54 PM
1

if having women on the board was good for business there wouldn't be a need for quotas the article was pretty good however and showed a lot of support against the claim
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:23 AM
3

why would that be grounds for a murder charge?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:26 AM
3

the latter
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:52 PM
15

the only question that needs to be addressed is Is a fetus a person? if the fetus is a person, then he should be charged with murder and abortion should not be legal if the fetus is not a person, then he can not have committed murder currently, US law contradicts itself in this
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:16 PM
1

subsidize the student's costs (in the form of vouchers) instead of on the school's, let the students choose which schools to go to, thus forcing the schools to compete if men turn out to be better teachers than those schools with more male teachers will out compete everyone else
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:09 PM
66

What I'd hate to see is the idea that a fetus is a person when the mother wants it to be but not when she doesn't want it to be. that is currently what the law states under the Unborn Victims of Violence Act Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit the prosecution— (1) of any person for conduct relating to an abortion for which the consent of the pregnant woman, or a person authorized by law to act on her behalf, has been obtained or for which such consent is implied by law; although…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:24 PM
19

basically a human fetus shifts from existing as a "person" depending on the circumstances so if a mother consents to an abortion the fetus is not a person and as such doesn't have a constitutional right to life. if she doesn't consent however the fetus exists as a person and does have a right to life, which means the other party can be charged for murder
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:21 PM
1

then this should be evident in private schools since i imagine they would compete with eachother
/r/MensRights16/05/13 03:06 PM
1

what is the ratio of male to female teachers in private schools? i imagine if there is a prejudice there then those schools will end up paying the price
/r/MensRights16/05/13 04:53 AM
1

I want the most qualified in every field except you said we should be granting men scholarships and preferred placement in teaching positions really you should be saying we should be granting scholarships and preferred placement to the most qualified regardless of gender etc.. ~ I'm talking about not chasing off half of the most talented teachers could you explain further?
/r/MensRights16/05/13 01:42 AM
1

because men aren't encouraged to go into education when did this start happening? That breeds a stigma that males don't/shouldn't want to be around children. citation needed do you also want an even representation of all races for all jobs? why would affirmative action suddenly work now when it has failed so many times before i would prefer the most qualified people get the job, instead of trying to meet some quota of what you think if there should be
/r/MensRights16/05/13 01:04 AM
-12

sometimes you have to create your own justice
/r/MensRights15/05/13 08:49 PM
2

to remedy specific, current, systemic barriers to equality of opportunity? such as?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 08:37 PM
1

so we need affirmative action because some people will discriminate? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZA1Q_1t1E0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUbOcgj8AjQ http://library.mises.org/books/William%20H%20Hutt/The%20Economics%20of%20the%20Colour%20Bar.pdf
/r/MensRights15/05/13 08:21 PM
5

what argument is there for affirmative action?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:06 PM
8

what do you make of the gender gap in STEM fields? Should this be resolved and if so how aim for equality of opportunity instead of all this affirmative action bs
/r/MensRights15/05/13 03:28 PM
2

If Men's Rights isn't just there to negate feminism then I am fine with it but there's a terrible issue with the movement when that's the very image it radiates. well I imagine this problem is solved for you now as you should have seen they have many legitimate points Society doesn't need them suppose they dont need them, do they benefit at all from them?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 01:09 AM
1

I'm saying there's no need for a Men's Rights movement because while it has much to work towards much of it is simply opposition to feminism and petty squabbling. what of it is directly against feminism? why are the things that are in opposition to it bad? is feminism always right? if not opposition to the wrong aspects is a good thing Men's Rights really just gives them a counterpart just as immature to squabble with. from what you have witnessed apparently ~ you haven't really said why gender …
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:52 AM
3

which of these are in opposition to feminism? After all, we just want courts to assume 50/50 custody at the start of all divorce proceedings (equality), a ban on MGM as there is for FGM (equality), reproductive rights for men equitable to what women have [or as close as is possible] (equality) and no more bullshit "quotas". the only one that stands out to me is the whole quota thing, which as sonja said, is bull shit. we should seek equality of opportunity instead
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:47 AM
3

i laughed
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:24 AM
3

i agree with all of this, i dont think i have ever seen these issues raised by feminists, which is why i assume mrm came to exist
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:21 AM
3

I'm just unconvinced that this movement is anything other than a detriment and it's only been harmful to the overall goal of equality. what exactly do you think is harmful about it?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:12 AM
5

Yes there are some terrible stupid and inane feminists but unlike the Men's Rights movement those appear to be in the minority of the overall movement. citation needed Instead of arguing for why men are disadvantaged why not argue for where both men and women are disadvantaged because feminism already argues for women only I've also noticed there's a significant macho-ist streak of the men's right movement that rather enforce the generic gender role of men and take pride in their manliness. why …
/r/MensRights14/05/13 11:59 PM
1

then the man should have the right to abort the fetus Why can't you understand that he has some responsibility to this child even if he accidentally made it and thats where we disagree
/r/MensRights12/05/13 07:08 PM
2

But you should at least be held accountable to pay SOMETHING. why? the mother would be making the choice to raise that child on her own
/r/MensRights12/05/13 06:20 PM
3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26QxO49Ycx0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZA1Q_1t1E0 The reason I come to you is that my professor wants me to make a case of the negative impacts of favoritism of women in job placement/promotion and I figured you would be able to give me many examples of such situations. it seems to me that if an employer is hiring purely based on their desire to hire women they may not be hiring the most qualified workers, as such their business will likely suffer and may not …
/r/MensRights12/05/13 05:59 PM
1

you already donate to charity by paying taxes, but i think this chart is pretty solid http://homefreefamilies.blogspot.ca/2013/02/charity-ceos-salaries.html
/r/MensRights08/05/13 02:38 AM
4

somewhat random question here what is the point of this whole privilege thing?
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter