oldspice75 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	"According to the affidavit, Gelineau burned her son’s penis and Cantrell burned his nipples, holding a lighter to them for about two minutes as he screamed in pain. Throughout that incident, Gelineau beat her son over the head with a stick, the police said." Should get the death penalty or life without parole	/r/MensRights	21/10/13 05:05 PM
-2	Deadbeat dad flees to Philippines leaving four kids without support - thestar.com Maybe the extra grand of spousal support was unfair but child support isn't. He could have paid what he could afford while contesting the spousal support. Instead he's telling his son with cancer and his disabled daughter to go to hell, basically. Even if they didn't have such terrible problems, they are legally and morally entitled to his financial support. In the article, he admits that he did a terrible thing. He's right. Again, men's rights isn't the right not to support children.	/r/MensRights	02/07/12 06:28 PM
-3	Deadbeat dad flees to Philippines leaving four kids without support - thestar.com He is a obviously a deadbeat because he is refusing to contribute to his 10 year old son recovering from cancer and 14 year old Down's syndrome daughter. The mother's actions don't change his moral responsibility for his children. She should sell the house and get a job if she can, but they have to live somewhere, the whole responsibility shouldn't be on her, and Canadian taxpayers shouldn't be supporting this guy's family instead of the parents.	/r/MensRights	02/07/12 05:08 PM
-2	Deadbeat dad flees to Philippines leaving four kids without support - thestar.com Yes I think nothing would be better. The gift was a tease that toyed with and hurt the son's feelings. The father really isn't giving his son anything any more in any meaningful way, so the cheap and seemingly randomly selected gift only rubs salt on a wound. Of course, the father does have an obligation to his children, and he is defaulting on the major obligation of his life.	/r/MensRights	02/07/12 05:04 PM
-4	Deadbeat dad flees to Philippines leaving four kids without support - thestar.com I can't imagine a child possibly wanting healthy mixed snacks as a birthday present. Not only is it inappropriate, it seems ultra impersonal. It really has nothing to do with the recipient. There's something passive aggressive about it. The guy is probably not as destitute as poor filipinos, and there are probably a lot of things there that are not necessarily expensive but would make an interesting gift.	/r/MensRights	02/07/12 05:01 AM
2	Deadbeat dad flees to Philippines leaving four kids without support - thestar.com The son was probably hoping for a good present that would reassure him that his absent dad still cares about him and is trying to maintain their connection. Then he saw peanuts and shit, a pretty insulting present really. Why would he want peanuts, popcorn and dried bananas from his deadbeat dad? It's an annoying, cheap and insulting present. The boy denies caring about his dad's present to cover his disappointment and dejection. If he can reject his father, he feels less rejected. The article i…	/r/MensRights	02/07/12 04:35 AM
14	Deadbeat dad flees to Philippines leaving four kids without support - thestar.com The kid has been through cancer, could have died, may still be in danger, and his father has disappeared from his life. Of course he must feel very abandoned and hurt. His parents financial battle isn't his fault. How would you have reacted if your 11th birthday present was dried fruit and peanuts?	/r/MensRights	02/07/12 04:04 AM
1	Should a child really be entitled to child support unconditionally? Calling what I said above "emotive garbage" doesn't make it less true. I said both parents.	/r/MensRights	15/02/12 04:27 AM
1	Should a child really be entitled to child support unconditionally? If men's reproductive rights is the cause of enabling men to literally deny or take the food from their own children's mouths, I want no part of it. It seems like an extremely unjust cause to me. Children don't ask to be conceived and are fundamentally owed support from both parents.	/r/MensRights	15/02/12 01:06 AM
1	Should a child really be entitled to child support unconditionally? A child may not understand this because they haven't learned about the economic reality of life yet. But a parent who would insinuate himself into a child's life while denying the child financial support is exploitative of the child's affection rather than loving. When that child grows up, they will realize who was there for them in a substantive way. Working hard to provide for a family is a substantive form of love. Men who don't want to be a money tree can take precautions. If they end up as …	/r/MensRights	14/02/12 08:11 PM
1	Should a child really be entitled to child support unconditionally? Even someone who helps feed and clothe their child but doesn't see them is more of a father than someone who enjoys a child's company and time while giving them nothing.	/r/MensRights	14/02/12 04:58 PM
6	Should a child really be entitled to child support unconditionally? Men's rights shouldn't be about men getting rid of responsibilities, and leaving their sons and daughters without a father. Children deserve to be supported by both parents; they do not deserve to be wards of the state.	/r/MensRights	13/02/12 12:50 AM
-8	Society if fucked up - why is it that a woman can purposely get herself pregnant by not taking the pill ... and the man is still on the hook for child support A father's debt isn't to the woman; it's to the child he created	/r/MensRights	01/12/11 02:37 AM