TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

omfg-srin Archive

View 1 post and 102 comments by omfg-srin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
56

Discussionomfg-srin/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 08:20 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This sounds more like New Age bullshit.
/r/AntiFeminists01/08/22 05:00 PM
1

This whole spiel that some clearly intelligent individuals have in this sub about how 'trans people are in denial of basic human biology' is nothing short of genius. If a demographic which is quite literally mentally tormented over the reality of biological appearance not aligning with psychological ideation of 'selfhood' / 'personhood' is somehow 'in denial' of biology, then the very notion of gender dysphoria (which is defined as 'psychological distress that results from an incongruence betwee…
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:57 PM
1

That didn't answer my question. Anybody can call anybody else an anything, but does that make them 'wokeist'?
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:06 PM
1

How do we define 'crazy wokeism'? What sort of parameters make 'crazy wokeism' what it is? If, for example, I inadvertently misgender a transgender man who is only in the starting phases of his transition from female sex to male gender, and he says to me, 'Hey, sorry, I actually identify as a man,' is that already 'crazy wokeism' because the words 'misgender', 'identify', and the feeling of an individual having been offended for being misidentified is all in one scenario? What about if a transma…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 06:51 PM
4

Excluding a vulnerable minority demographic of men (transmen) who likewise can benefit from men's rights advocacies simply because people think it's 'wokeness' makes people no different from TERF feminazis who think witch-hunts on transgender women make them 'real' or 'proper' advocates for womanhood at large. Rights should be universal if we expect it to be equal. Once we begin to have a debate over who gets what rights why and how because whatever reason, then we end up precisely where the fem…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 06:01 PM
1

Soooo pointing out a clearly observable fact is 'hate' if it doesn't conform to your parameters, but it's 'free speech' if it fits with your mould, Toread01? 🤔
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 03:11 PM
-9

That's more Daddy Jordy's cult's thang, not mine. But your username checks out, so that's lovely. 🙂
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 03:08 PM
-21

That's because Daddy Jordy is a pseudo-intellectual with an axe to grind on people he doesn't consider as 'real people'. Also, 'misandrists gatekeep that compassion and tell them the only way they can get it is to gender transition' is a literal boatload of misinformation. For ya'll folks who believe you'd be welcome into the world and treated with love, respect, care and understanding if you are by any chance someone who 'gender transitions', you're gonna be in for a helluva surprise. For start…
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 03:04 PM
1

Why don't you spell it out clearer? No matter how much you deny your transphobia, it's all over the place with self-contradictory statements like 'I am not against trans people,' doubled-down with 'you're a [they] are a deluded, self-aggrandising, idiot attempting to pretend as if your [their] imagination is reality'. Why don't you just say what you really mean and quit all of the bollocks? You're plain as day. Current medical science CAN and DOES have the capacity to change one's physical appea…
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 10:54 AM
2

Not at all. I am asking you for your credentials on the subject matter in the same vein that if you argued physics or surgery against a physicist or a surgeon, when you are neither of those professions, then all of your opinions are ultimately worth less than dog shit. So, are you IN ANY CAPACITY WHATSOEVER someone who specialises in any of the fields which deal with matters like gender identity / manifestation of gender in society / dynamics and complexity of gender roles in society / someone w…
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 09:45 AM
-2

I am not arguing against the validity of sex as it applies to genus homo. But genus homo is not comprised EXCLUSIVELY of their sex, nor is their sex the sum total of their being. Being that humans are complex creatures, to 'essentialise' a person's being exclusively through sex alone, and to debate over the 'validity' of various iterations of human identity is not only blatantly reductionist / sexist, but it is an excellent exercise at bigotry disguising itself as 'concern' or 'rationality'. 100…
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 09:41 AM
1

And you believe that there are no current-day parameters which ensure that individuals who undertake gender-transition and whatever other surgeries they may opt for are of sound mind why? Do you work for / are affiliated with / directly associated with clinics which address these matters directly? If so, could you point out exactly which clinics / hospitals have broken the law by not following parameters to ensure that people who undertake gender transition are 100% of sound mind so they can be …
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 09:35 AM
1

Are you a registered psychologist or in any capability a doctor which specialises in the field gender / gender dysphoria / behavioural psychology? Or are you in any capacity an anthropologist who has spent a significant period of time studying how identity varies / exists in various complexities throughout a number of different cultures? Could you perhaps be an historian with a background on people and their views of sexuality, gender, and gender relations / dynamics / presentation? Are in any w…
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 09:31 AM
-6

The world is complex. 'Male' and 'female' is not always applicable to 'all species', as you claim, and even in those cases wherein it applies, there are complexities as to what it is or what it entails. If you have a problem with trans-people, why not just say it outright in plainspeak and not attempt to disguise bigotry as flawed 'logic' that doesn't hold up to any proper scrutiny?
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 09:17 AM
0

That applies to language / linguistics, but doesn't cover anthropology or history. Your highly reductionist and infantile 'reasoning' fails to encompass the complexity of human identities and is nothing more than an attempt to disguise blatant transphobia as 'logic'.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 09:13 AM
5

Incel is a unisex term that can apply to both sexes / genders, and folks ought to remember it as such.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 09:02 AM
0

No. Being MALE or FEMALE does. Being a 'man' or a 'woman' is shaped by a myriad of things.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 08:34 AM
12

The entire notion of 'masculinity' is total nonsense. What is 'masculine' in one part of the world might not be in others. What is expected of a man from Java is not what is expected of a man from Australia. Things like hunting, bushcrafting, tanning hides, etc., which are typically considered 'masculine' in the Western world is just a unisex task for folks in third-world countries. In this similar vein, what is a 'woman'? What 'woman' is in the Sub-Saharan regions is not what 'woman' is in Amer…
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 07:33 AM
10

Do what makes you happy. It takes A LOT OF WORK to keep a good house. Ensuring that your family (in whatever form) is happy and well-taken-care-of is a noble and admirable thing. It isn't 'shameful', nor is it 'oppression'. It's an ESSENTIAL role.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 06:51 AM
15

'Moids' is a term their own 'enemies' - the so-called 'incel movement' use. Funny how they adopt the language of extremists and use it for their own brand of extremism.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/22 06:45 AM
1

You're describing yourself with the first descriptor, there. Also, did you just assume my linguistic leanings? 🧐 The audacity. The Waffle SS ought to have you! 🤣🤣🤣
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 05:08 PM
1

Define 'real'. Did you just assume my state of detestation? 🤔 Also, if you understand what being a misogynist supposedly is, why in Titivillus' name can't you spell it properly? 🤣🤣🤣
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 05:02 PM
4

Why can't people just hate all of humankind equally? Imagine how wonderful life would be if everybody hated everybody else, not for their sex, race, gender, or beliefs, but only for the sole fact that they are human... 🫥
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 04:58 PM
1

It may be lost on you - as usual - but you're actually describing yourself. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 04:55 PM
1

So this means that you lack a basic grasp of the English language and it's proper usage, AND you feel like your grossly ignorant opinions trump modern scientific and psychological research... Interesting... 🧐
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 04:42 PM
1

And are you in any way medically capable - as an expert in the field - to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that her 'smok[ing] every other female swimmer' was due to the fact that she is transgender, or are you just a fuckwit with an opinion? Also... 'every other female swimmer...' So you DO acknowledge that Lia Thomas is likewise female / a woman? 🤔 As for 'real', are YOU 'real'? Can you prove your 'realness'? Interesting...
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 04:00 PM
1

Are you a scientist who can prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that Ms Thomas REALLY had an 'advantage', or are you just a fuckwit with an opinion? 🤔 Hopefully that cough is terminal. You could use the rest and relaxation. ☺️
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 03:55 PM
1

'Totally unfair advantage' is an opinion, not a scientific fact. Science says otherwise, but your idiocy simply won't have it. Why are you so gung-ho about women's sports? Are you a woman? If you aren't, why are you calling the shots for who women can or can't exclude? 🤔 I ain't the idiot who's currently foaming at the mouth - you are. So why don't YOU stay mad and hopefully the void will give a fuck and take you, so that YOU stay away from calling the shots on things that don't concern you dire…
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 03:49 PM
1

Not if you're debating over a person's unalienable right to exist without being oppressed by dumbfucks who presume that THEY are the ones being 'oppressed'. Nobody has to 'care', really. But little shitling you seems quite riled up. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 03:41 PM
1

Allow me to elucidate, since you're a bit slow on the uptake: If. You. Are. None. Of. Those. Things. Your. Opinions. Are. Worth. Less. Than. Dog. Shit.
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 03:35 PM
1

Just because you studied it in school and did your 'homeworks' doesn't make you any of the following: an anthropologist a sociologist a geneticist a molecular biologist a behavioural psychologist or even anything with a modicum of intelligence to become any sort of authority on what sort of people are 'real' and what supposedly 'aren't'. How's about YOU do your 'homeworks'? 🤣🤣🤣 And maybe learn when you've had 'enougjhs'...
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 03:11 PM
1

How dare you assume my state of being?! 💀 I doubt you even know what neurons actually are... 🤣🤣🤣
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 03:05 PM
1

I don't think your brain is capable enough to understand what 'oppression' really means. Also, I ain't your baby, sweetie. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 12:40 PM
2

'What right to exist...' The right you yourself should've never had the privilege of having. As for csgender women, we have an overload of rights and privileges in the Western world that we often take for granted. I see now that talking with a waste of air ain't worth it. 🤣
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 12:59 AM
1

Transmen (people born female, transitioned to male) might beat biological women and transgender women, because the sort of meds they take give them the same sort of muscular / strength advantage that biological men have physiologically speaking. Transmen are NOT transwomen. It is TRANSWOMEN that the pundits insist cannot compete with biological women in sports, in spite of contrary evidence showing that their perceived 'advantages' are close to non-existent. P. S. Transman = born female transiti…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 08:48 PM
1

If they are transgender and on medication, yes, definitely. Do you think it is fair to exclude someone born female to compete in male sports simply because he was born a woman but is now a man, or do you question the validity of such a person's manhood in the same way feminazi scum question YOUR manhood when you fail to perform feats of strength ala-He-Man, or if and when you fail to conform to unfair and arbitrary standards of what a 'man' should be, how a 'man' should look, and what sort of th…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 08:44 PM
1

A cisgender man, sure. A transgender woman beating a woman with half the training? I am not so sure. Then again, I am neither a sports coach, a kalisthenics specialist, nor a professional athlete, so that's not my problem to worry about or solve. What I DO know is that from a medical vantage-point, the sort of medication transgender women take in order to facilitate gender transition (i. e. the combination of anti-androgens and estrogen) weakens them significantly. Some studies suggest that the …
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 08:42 PM
2

'Just because they think they are female'. They don't 'think' they are female. Their minds dictate that they are women. That doesn't make them biologically 'female', but medical science is able to better align their physical body with their minds allowing them to be women. 'Female' = biology. 'Woman' = socio-ideological identity. Major difference. Furthermore, the argument of 'these freaks are as strong as men' is pseudo-scientific horse-shit, because the sort of medication they take is quite li…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 08:20 PM
2

You have an even bigger problem if you think that the solution to everything is 'beating the shit out of somebody'. Way to go, toxic masculinity! Also, last I checked, a five-foot whatever with a gun and training, or a four-foot whatever with a knife, regardless of gender, can put down and kill even your Rambo micropenis with ease. ALSO, in case your roided-out brains forgot about how the law oftentimes turns a blind-eye on violence done against men, and how even self-defense by men can be twist…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 06:29 PM
1

Such blatant transphobia. How different is this bullshit from TERF feminazi scum?
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 06:22 PM
1

The day they stop sending men to die in wars and treating men like disposable grunts whose sole purpose is toil away for others is the day their oppression ends.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 07:37 AM
3

Dude deserved protection. He literally lost a digit over a psychopathic woman. If the genders were reversed, protection woulda been all over.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 07:36 AM
2

That is clearly a woman of colour. Or it could be that the folks who are seeing this are incapable of discernment and cannot tell that that is a MALE ALPACA? 🫥
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 03:39 PM
1

'Your anecdotal evidence as a man...' When you realise that I am actually a woman. All of your assumptions are wind. Oh, and why don't you step into my part of the world and try to profess belief in Islam while being queer OPENLY (and by openly, I mean be really loud about it. Go on interviews. Tell them how the Prophet Muhammad was also bisexual. Tell them the Quran does not REALLY forbid being gay. Tell them it isn't really zina when you still keep to the Five Pillars and keep hijab) and let's…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:12 AM
1

TERF extremism has become 'mainstream' feminist ideology. Your argument is really along the lines of 'We aren't like the Catholics and the Evangelicals. We may be Christian, but we aren't anti-LGBTQIA.'
/r/MensRights07/07/22 03:14 PM
5

This reeks of incest fantasies... I doubt even the Lannisters would approve of this.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/22 02:44 PM
2

Things are more complicated than that. It wasn't 'men' that overruled Roe v Wade, but a system steeped in conservative religious nonsense. And in times of dissent and revolt, if 'men' don't help out because it 'isn't their fight', that's a lot of extra people lost that's needed to win a fight. Didn't California governor Newsom side with pro-abortion rights? He's a man. Should he maybe NOT do what he's doing (making a decision regarding women's rights and bodies) simply because he is a man? I und…
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 11:57 PM
2

Take care, Antoine. 💜
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 04:44 AM
1

And, as usual, it hasn't answered the single question I have asked. Why don't you just say what you REALLY mean? 'I am feigning superiority but my own claim didn't stand up to scrutiny so now I am trying to shame someone by pointing out their PRIOR ignorance of a certain thing.' I would proudly die on a hill that ensured TRUE equality for all peoples. Do I have to be a lawyer to make that happen? And on that regard: ARE YOU? 😶
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 04:39 AM
1

I don't have any issue whatsoever with birth control. The responsible usage of which should apply to all parties who fuck. Am I really creating a one-sided narrative? My question is simple: why shouldn't Stacy be given the right to abort, unimpeded by draconian laws rooted primarily in religious sentiment? Not really 'shifting the goalpost'. More like 'what exactly are you defending?' Your own 'defence' doesn't even hold up to scrutiny. Cite exactly where RAINN states the specific caveat you poi…
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 04:27 AM
1

And your so-called trigger laws apparently seem to be imperfect and draconian in their wording, so much so that even your resource points out that some iterations of it are problematic. Sterlisation, huh? And if perchance Stacy wants biological offspring at a later age? Why doesn't Chadwick get a vasectomy, then, or likewise get sterilised? Or use a condom? Could it be that hormonal birth control cannot work for everybody because there are associated risks of its usage for some demographics? And…
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 03:58 AM
2

Sources for trigger laws citation: Guttmacher: https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2022/06/13-states-have-abortion-trigger-bans-heres-what-happens-when-roe-overturned Additional source: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/04/us/abortion-trigger-laws.html 'Stacy having sex with some guy who stealthd her and gets her pregnant doesn't qualify for a trigger law exemption.' In draconian states / nations where abortion is illegalised, yes. But SHOULDN'T Stacy have the unalienable right to an abortion due t…
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 03:27 AM
2

Source is Guttmacher Institute.org According to several articles online, RAINN itself understands how some iterations of the trigger law are problematic. I quote: 'The Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network, or RAINN, estimates that 1 in 6 women are victims of sexual assault. But Salt Lake County District Attorney Sim Gill says most of them never report it. “It is invasive. It is brutal. It is traumatic,” says Gill. “We as a society have not made it safe for victims to be able to come forward …
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 02:54 AM
-1

It's inane ramblings like this that turn women off from actively discussing issues that affect men's rights; and it gives feminazis the perfect kind of fodder they need to fuel their own brand of extremism. In a world where you'd stab both friend and foe without hesitation, you become everybody's enemy.
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 02:35 AM
1

You miss my point. I will reiterate: even WITH trigger laws and their caveats for very specific cases, in areas where corruption is rife, those caveats can be ignored. Also, from what I have read on trigger laws in relation to Roe v Wade, most of it is pretty much anti-abortion oriented, which, again, is an infringement of a woman's right of choice. I quote: These are the 13 states that have passed trigger laws and what those laws entail: Arkansas In Arkansas, a trigger law would ban almost all …
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 02:22 AM
0

But in places where police corruption and systemic racism is strong, a police report will mean close to nothing, so that still doesn't count as proper or effective protections for such scenarios.
/r/AntiFeminists25/06/22 02:03 AM
3

So emotional trauma and financial ruin is not 'violation' enough for you? Why don't you say what you REALLY mean? 'I don't give a fuck about men's rights. I only want to hate things and the people who love and care for women can go fuck themselves.'
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 10:01 PM
2

A vodka, please and thank you.
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 09:18 PM
5

Tell that to fathers of children who are victims of rape. Husbands of women who die of medical complications that could've otherwise been readily treated. Extremism really can make people short-sighted. 'Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.'
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 09:13 PM
2

And are YOU in Afghanistan? Are you going to be the one to bleed to death of an untreated miscarriage? Are you gonna take one for your team and be a victim of rape forced to carry to term? If you're for ?men's rights like you claim you are, are you going to be therevat the forefront protecting the rights of your gay brothers-in-arms once your government comes after them too? Or are gay men not 'men' for you because of whatever insane homophobic reason? Looks to me like you're a self-absorbed pri…
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 09:05 PM
1

And like clockwork, the vermin under the woodwork crawl up from the depths. Bloody fucking hell. 🤮
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 08:57 PM
4

This isn't a loss for feminism. It's a loss for basic human rights. This is a win for religious extremists and rabid 'pro-lifers' who couldn't even give a rat's arse about the homeless or the needy. It's 'pro-life' until you are born into this world, and then it's 'fuck you!' until you die.
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 08:54 PM
3

You are EXACTLY the sort of unhinged extremist on the other end of the sex spectrum that is just as vile as any rabid feminazi.
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 08:51 PM
1

They want violence, so long as it ensures that it is we - the commonfolk - that die in the aftermath. The tactic worked well for them for centuries. Some men MIGHT be willing to fight a 'gender war'. I've seen my fair share of the extremist end of MGTOW and men's rights movements. Those kinds of folks - trigger happy, religiously preoccupied, very anti-LGBTQ - they'd be more than willing. Hopefully they aren't given enough leverage and platforms to actually make it happen.
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 07:28 PM
2

If folks do resort to violence as a solution to extremism, that would be the day the extremists will have truly won. Revolution sounds beautiful on paper, until all the vermin crawl up from the woodwork and begin to usurp the chaos. Fast revolution is messy revolution. In this day and age, we can no longer opt for messy revolution. That is exactly what the rich and powerful overlords who are left after heads have flown and blood has flooded freely want. It isn't just extremist feminism gone awry…
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 07:13 PM
2

Poetry is subjective. 😅
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 12:00 PM
16

Any and all forms of extremism are a cancer to society. 😮‍💨
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 09:19 AM
1

Reading and writing were a class issue. The right to vote was fought for by the Women's Suffrage Movement, which is NOTHING like the pseudo-feminism of today. The capacity and freedom to step out of homes was ALSO a class issue. An oyster-shucker girl didn't need no gosh-darned chaperone because they didn't have the money for it and it was unnecessary. Rich ladies belonging to the bourgeoisie and nobility on the other hand, did, because it showcased 'refinement', 'class', and 'power'. The insist…
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 09:13 AM
1

I checked it yesterday myself. She's I N S A N E. 🫥
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 09:01 AM
1

I specifically stated WESTERN COUNTRIES. The issues that women face in predominantly religiously conservative countries are a byproduct of religious extremism, which is NOT tied in to Western feminism's concept of 'the Patriarchy', and has dynamics that cannot be summed up as easily with 'all men ebil'. It has everything to do with conservative ideologies that shifted and mutated into extreme iterations thanks in some respect to colonisation, or in other cases due to the after-effect of war. In …
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 08:56 AM
1

So, if she is assaulted, it won't count because she's white? What the father fucking fuck? 😶
/r/AntiFeminists24/06/22 08:28 AM
1

This is why in my personal relationships the rules are 'no marriage', 'no monogamy', and 'no shared property'.
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 09:30 PM
8

Because ultimately, a dildo is a tool to get from point A to point B. It's a tool, like a paint brush or a sword. It isn't 'gendered'. I can have as many orgasms as I want using my hands or a dildo or a vibrator, but that still nothing compared to the human connection I get if I am having sex with - at least in my case - another woman. In such a scenario, it is no longer just getting from point A to B, but a complex dynamic of all sorts of emotions. In the case of men, the argument of 'all men a…
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 01:27 PM
1

If they had so much power, they wouldn't resort to antics like bullying far more vulnerable minority groups or co-opting the mob into parroting insane ideologies. They imitate the trappings of power, but have no true form of power themselves, which is why they act in desperation. It's the exact mirror of what they insist the 'patriarchy' has always done.
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 01:00 PM
7

She needs to be sent to a lunatic asylum. Her complexes are none of my concern and not my problem to solve, but she is a danger to society since she is promoting divisive, bigoted ideologies.
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 07:49 AM
6

Knowledge is power. And these feminazis lack both. 😶
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 05:36 AM
9

Also, these feminazis really don't know history. Father's Day is NOT a product of 'the patriarchy'. In the U. S. It was started by a WOMAN named Sonora Smart Dodd, a SINGLE-MOTHER, and known FEMINIST. Wiki has this to say about Ms Dodd's creating Father's Day: 'Though a Father's Day service was held on July 5, 1908 in West Virginia to honor the fathers killed in the Monongah Mine Disaster, it is Sonora Smart Dodd who is credited as the founder of the official American national holiday. Smart hel…
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 03:13 AM
31

'... and same sex couples...' so gay men who have children aren't 'fathers'? 🤔 Fuckery of fuckeries. Everything is fuckery.
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 03:04 AM
20

Feminazis love to imagine that the world can exist in an imbalanced state. They also think we would get to where we are today (if not better), if no men were around. A good take on how preposterous such a notion is is covered by the 2010 film 'The Lady Shogun and Her Men', based off a manga written by Fumi Yoshinaga (a woman) called Ooku: The Inner Chambers. The film showcases the kind of world feminazis dream of and how it will play out, and is actually an excellent critique on gender dynamics …
/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 12:07 AM
8

Predatory behaviour knows no gender. That being said, simply being gay does not make one a de-facto predator; which is why it is preposterous to tag 'all men' as predators by virtue of their sex / gender.
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 10:21 PM
3

Have you tried to trace how far the First to Third Wave feminism movements have gotten to giving women exactly the equal opportunities that we currently have today? Maybe you intentionally forget that thanks to the early Women's Suffrage movement, women in the Western world now have the right to vote, the right to own property, the right to gainful employment, and the right to bodily autonomy (something Far Eastern and Middle Eastern societies already had thousands of years prior)? We have even …
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 11:36 AM
4

That isn't what the original 'involuntary celibate' blog was about. It was a queer woman who tried to band together other 'involuntary celibates', and was predominantly a rant page about how unattractive she was towards men. This project, called 'Alana's Involuntary Celibacy Project', became a hub for all sorts of people who experienced what they termed as 'involuntary celibacy'. In the later years of the 'project', Alana herself would quit the forum she made once she came into terms with her bi…
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 10:57 AM
4

Someone here posted about how the early incel movement was about 'equality'. That comment was deleted, but this is my reply: That isn't what the original 'involuntary celibate' blog was about. It was a queer woman who tried to band together other 'involuntary celibates', and was predominantly a rant page about how unattractive she was towards men. This project, called 'Alana's Involuntary Celibacy Project', became a hub for all sorts of people who experienced what they termed as 'involuntary cel…
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 10:57 AM
5

'Incel' was a neologism coined by a woman, as a matter of fact.
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 08:53 AM
10

I wonder when the feminazis will realise that inceldom is a direct byproduct of their own twisted ideologies?
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 07:59 AM
6

The worst thing about being a man is being a man. They let you die in wars, they work you like mules, and people think you're disposable. All of the 'privileges' a man gets is just a bribe so they remain compliant or tolerant of the abuse meted out to them. I wouldn't want to be a man. But in this current society, I am sick of being a woman. If it's hell to be one and torment to be another, maybe one is better off dead...
/r/AntiFeminists18/06/22 08:38 AM
-2

Wow. The anti-sex-work-out-of-spite-for-all-women-in-general and not just feminazi scum is strong in this post.
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/22 07:01 AM
1

I personally think the opposite. With the current political climate also being very anti-sexual liberation, anti-trans rights, and very misandrist, rather than the radical tearing themselves apart, what would most likely happen is they'll radicalise moderate-leaning feminists or the youth (which is the demographic they're mostly targeting). I just hope I am not gonna be right.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/22 11:46 AM
0

And if you tell these feminazis that a queer woman first coined the term 'incel', and that the modern-day 'incel subculture' is just as much a byproduct of toxic feminist ideology as it is the byproduct of harmful and toxic masculinity perpetuated by harsh societal demands for male / male-presenting individuals, they'll automatically say you're 'defending' the bullcrap incels are promoting. Whenever dialogue becomes impossible, only extremism flourishes.
/r/AntiFeminists09/06/22 11:35 AM
10

Because feminazi ideology is not really 'pro-women'. It's a cult rooted in Western takes on Western problems that they try to project as 'eternal constants' across the board. It programs women into a hive-mentality that claims to empower us only so long as we follow the cult's propaganda. The worst thing that happened to me as a woman is 'feminism'. The best thing that ever happened to me as a human being is cross-cultural exposure. Feminazi ideology says 'We can teach you how to be a strong, em…
/r/AntiFeminists08/06/22 03:04 AM
6

Women also fall under that descriptor, for very obvious reasons. But the term was coined to be more inclusive to transmen.
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 02:25 PM
6

Actually, the 'people with uteruses' and 'people who menstruate' applies for transmen; because some transmen who AREN'T on hormones for whatever reason, or who haven't had a hysterectomy (removal of the uterus), fall under 'people who menstruate' / 'people with uteruses' (who aren't exactly 'women'). It isn't 'purely ideological'. It is a considerate (albeit clumsy) attempt at inclusiveness. The misunderstanding regarding the terminologies you have cited is due in part to the fact that the TERF …
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 02:14 PM
7

It's misandry, plain and simple, coupled with a healthy dose of transphobia. Feminazis are quite keen on displays of transphobia. And it IS a phobia, because it is rooted in an irrational fear of 'theoretical' what-ifs (i.e. transwomen will 'rape' women; transmen have been 'brainwashed' by the patriarchy). The transgender movement has a helluva lot of flaws, sure, but lumping all transpeople together along with the bad eggs under their lobby for basic human rights makes the act no different from…
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 12:57 PM
4

A yelling ANYTHING won't care about facts, but your audience might. Oh, and last I checked, that man there is also foaming at the mouth. So they're both being dumbfucks, actually.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 05:02 PM
8

This isn't a good way to argue why the wage gap exists. A good chunk of his arguments are based on personal sentiment, not facts.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 05:32 AM
14

If femnists really stood up for their principles, they wouldn't hate on transwomen, especially since they experience the same sort of difficulties / forms of abuse / harassment that biological women do. But the way they treat transwomen (as pariahs) and the way they treat transmen (lost, misguided 'sisters' corrupted by 'the patriarchy') shows feminism's true face: pure, totalitarian, extremist misandry.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:13 AM
3

'A miserable little pile of secrets.' Vlad Tepes, Castlevania: Symphony of the Night.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 08:40 AM
40

Split, like proper adults, if able. Take turns if splitting is not currently viable for whatever reason.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 12:40 AM
1

Sorry. I am no transphobe. Transphobia is a major selling point of the radfem cult, and I for one have no tolerance for that sort of ideology.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 12:05 AM
4

It's a common tactic used by cults.
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/22 03:31 PM
32

Even women should skip out on the 'feminists'. You like to do the housework? Patriarchy programmed you. You work nine-to-five but don't earn as much as men do? You allowed the patriarchy to drag you down. You want kids? The patriarchy convinced you to be a baby-maker. You don't want kids? You are not embracing the power of your inner Divine Feminine. You present as a femme lesbian? You are pandering to the male gaze because you're a pick-me girl. You dress androgynously or 'butch'? You are insec…
/r/AntiFeminists01/05/22 05:42 AM
1

Leave. I am a woman, and I used to be in a relationship with a radfem woman. When our views began to differ and I started to explore issues on men's rights (my best friend was a victim of domestic abuse, but nobody believed him, until he chose to take matters into his own hands and leave permanently), the issues that affect the transgender community (my sister is a transwoman), and the lack of intersectionality of the current-day 'feminist' movement, things turned nasty. No amount of reasoning c…
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/22 05:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter