TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

oniongasm Archive

View 0 posts and 53 comments by oniongasm on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

Yup. I stepped in to prevent my brother being abused by his girlfriend. He walked away from the situation. I kept her back so he could leave and she turned on me. Queue 25 minutes of her slapping, scratching, spitting, and cursing at me. I know because the 911 caller narrated the whole thing. I finally pushed her down on a patch of grass, walked 40yds away, and sat down. When the police showed up, I was arrested. With no buttons on my shirt, my glasses gone, bruises from my chest on up, and burs…
/r/MensRights28/11/16 12:21 AM
1

Oh wow yeah. Definitely not boring! Did everything get sorted out? I hope you're not still going through all of that
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:13 PM
1

Yeah I had two other judges for the other hearings, they just seemed bored more than anything
/r/MensRights10/10/16 01:10 PM
0

Hammered, known her for over a decade, was staying with my brother (her bf) for the night, felt emotionally obligated to fix things. Did I mention hammered? And I just don't have a lot of "fuck this, I'm out" built in. I'm generally the calming factor for my more hot-headed friends.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 06:10 AM
28

I dealt with (someone else's girlfriend) having a fight with her boyfriend, him leaving, her hitting me for 25 mins while I tried to calm her down (all narrated on 911 tape) I got arrested because (direct quote from the officer) "on calls like these, we arrest the guy". Remember that there were eyewitnesses to everything that happened. Despite the "victim" who shattered my glasses, tore my clothes, burst blood vessels on my eyes and left me bruised from chest to head (and who had no injuries) sh…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:44 PM
29

They don't usually ask if you've been arrested, just if you've been convicted of a crime. I wasn't. The case was dismissed, the woman came to court and pled on my behalf during every hearing. I will say this, I'm an engineer, was in grad school at the time, and have no record, not even a ticket. But I'm a tall muscular man with a shaved head. I've never heard as much venom out of anyone in my life as from the female judge at the second hearing, who argued for jail time when the prosecutor pushed…
/r/MensRights23/09/15 03:22 AM
24

I've been arrested for assault (initial call was DV, the BF left the area and she turned on me) where someone stayed on the line with 911 for 25 minutes narrating her abusing me and me just trying to calm her down. The cop, while he did a great job being calm and straightforward, told me straight up "when we get a call like this we arrest the guy".
/r/MensRights23/09/15 02:52 AM
72

All we have is a blip, but here's what that blip tells me: She has been charged There has been a trial She admitted to the charges Sentencing hasn't happened yet This is likely coming from a question asked by a reporter. If I had to guess, the question was something like: "Is she aware she could face jail time?" "Yes, she is aware of the possible sentences." So... wait for the actual sentence then get outraged (or not).
/r/MensRights02/03/15 08:32 PM
17

Tall, broad, and buzz-cut haircutted here. I've been arrested for assault when I tried to calm down a woman who ended up hitting, spitting on, and verbally abusing me (she was a family member's SO, I just wanted to calm her down so I could crash at his place) for 25 minutes. I know it's 25 minutes because the person who called the cops narrated it for the entirety. After 25 minutes of abuse I looked for a soft spot (grass) and pushed her down once, walked 50 yds down the sidewalk, and sat down. …
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:15 AM
2

I only associated it with men, frankly. Looking into this taught me that the two leading causes of death are roughly the same for men and women (23-25% Heart Disease, 22-24% Cancer) So... this gendered advertisement taught me about how alike we are. To advertise something for one gender doesn't mean you aren't also advertising for everyone. Feb 7 is National Wear Red Day, which is to raise awareness about heart disease in women. THE ENTIRE MONTH OF FEBRUARY IS AMERICAN HEART MONTH. I don't see h…
/r/MensRights07/02/14 12:18 AM
-1

Feminism doesn't do shit cohesively. The same as the MRM doesn't do shit cohesively. Both are, in fact, disparate movements that stem from a single original goal and have evolved (often splitting) from there. Feminism isn't lying about shit. There's plenty of groups that say they couldn't give a rat's ass about men's issues and plenty who do, in fact care. And everything in between. And they are, in fact, all Feminists. And wake up. Different groups are accustomed to different manners of convers…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:31 AM
1

The rephrase reads a lot better. There's just something about the structure of your last comment... I read it, I see you're saying ABC... and my eyes snap back to "but it looks like XYZ!" and so I see that. Despite the disclaimers in the comment, that's what happens when I read it. The Gillis article strikes me as being off the mark here. Taken out of context it reads fine, but in context it's a terrible quote. And it gets there in a snarky, semantically bickering sort of way. This remark of Wam…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:15 AM
2

And this isn't oppression olympics... But it is when it's framed in the way you did here. It becomes: 1. A is a problem 2. B is a problem 3. But seriously, A is a bigger problem Sure you mention both sides, but come on. I'd say you're probably right, that women are more affected by masculinity than men are by femininity. But what is the purpose of that statement? What benefit does it provide to the discussion? It makes the reader DIRECTLY COMPARE the effects of gender-based "harshness" on men vs…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 05:05 AM
0

A few things: You will often see people who identify as MRAs say that the MRM is a movement for equality, while they only focus on men's issues. Many feminists do the same thing. This is not bad. People should focus their energies most on whatever they're passionate about. They tend to get more done that way. Feminism is not under any obligation to directly address men's issues. The men's rights movement is not under any obligation to address women's issues. However, as long as both movements wo…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 04:35 AM
7

In all my years no guy has ever mentioned you can have a hard on while you're uncomfortable or that they've had unwanted sexual experiences with girls except there's supposedly 1 in 6 men that have. That's the power of social pressure for you! We're socialized to either glorify sexual encounters (dude, see her? yeah. tapped that.), minimize them (she was a dead fish), or act as though they didn't happen. I am the poster boy for privilege. White male in a STEM field from an affluent, undivided fa…
/r/MensRights17/01/14 06:15 AM
3

Feminism is completely different from being combative towards other points of view. That's a trait of people. The person I value the most for gender discussion isn't involved with MR, she's a Feminist. Very staunchly so. She is actually the stereotype: the Women's Studies/Psychology/Sociology major (well, graduate). Why do I value her opinion? Because she thinks about things differently than me. Because she's not afraid to speak her mind, but also willing to listen. Because she provides an inter…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 07:32 AM
1

The article as [sic] about rich people, not genders. Which is what I was getting at. Cheers!
/r/MensRights02/10/13 02:16 PM
19

Just a note: I only looked through the first part of the list, but half of those are family inheritances, not spousal. Now reading on the pattern more than holds. I'm counting 13/20 as either family inheritance or self-made. And most maintain(ed) some degree of executive control. That is, they work(ed) at it once they got it. No need to take anything from them. More than that, many of these mention sons who have assumed control. Sons who are no more or less worthy than inheriting mothers.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 08:11 AM
0

I was going to make some wise-ass insulting remark... and I tried to think of something... but apparently I don't keep insults on tap. Sorry, uh, I hope you're having a nice evening? Shit, that doesn't work.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 06:00 AM
0

Requires some vocabulary. Need a catch-all.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:45 AM
0

But then you have the fun jurisdictions where assault and battery are not so clearly divided! In the state of Washington for example, assault can mean the act which causes physical harm.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:39 AM
2

Simply put, Men's Rights Activism is about the concept that men face unique societal and legal problems that negatively affect them as a group. It's about understanding and addressing those problems to promote equality. Note that the above makes no reference to women. How then can it be misogynistic? Of course MRAs understand that women face their own problems, but people are allowed to choose which issues are most important to them. Some people fight injustice against men, some against women, s…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:34 AM
1

Yup!
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:14 PM
17

Try a double edged safety razor. For me, less razor burn and replacements cost pennies. I keep a cartridge razor around for travel but my safety razor is my go to.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:57 AM
3

Out of curiosity, why is it strange?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 11:03 AM
4

No unwanted children effectively indefinitely and the reversal shot is literally water + baking soda
/r/MensRights29/07/13 11:21 AM
5

I'm looking forward to RISUG. Outpatient injection, 10+ year effectiveness, reversible with a single injection. It looks like it'll be marketed as VasalGel in the US, available 2015.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 05:14 AM
2

It means sites that create duplicates of other sites are a common way to get around filters (like the one your office has). Proxy Avoidance: Avoiding the filter by using a proxy.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:55 PM
1

Its apparently either illegal or against bar association/court rules (pretty sure its former) to let the jury know what the punishment for the crime they are deliberating is. That doesn't make sense to me, because we all assume that the penalties for the more serious crimes (murder) are pretty severe. Informing the jury of sentencing options would make them weigh the laws themselves. A juror's role is to interpret the facts of the case, not the law. I know I don't want the law to be in the hands…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:28 AM
5

I only know a handful of Women's Studies majors, so this is anecdotal at best. But I have a hard time because the general response, even when just asking questions (simple, not-too-charged questions) is "Oh, you think you're qualified to discuss this?" Now, that's a personal problem on their parts, but at many turns we've talked and they've had issues when confronted with things in the form of "Devil's Advocate" arguments. I don't know enough about these issues to formulate a coherent, novel arg…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:52 AM
1

I know I (mostly) lurk on MR, AskFeminists, and Feminism for that very reason. Wanting to understand more.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 09:26 AM
2

I've been lucky, but I go with be friends first, THEN talk about gender issues. Then they know me, they know I'm coming from a position of musing about everything. They're more willing to be open-minded, because I play Devil's Advocate a lot. So I'm at about 70% success in finding good feminists to talk to. I've taken one girl from laughing (out loud) when the concept of a MRA was mentioned to asking my opinion about the male perspective on a lot of issues. Now I don't necessarily identify as a …
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:03 AM
1

There's definitely a reason I used certified mail. And that's it. No ambiguity, the federal government says you got it. Someone signed for it. Paper trail all the things.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 03:04 AM
1

Agreed. However, OP's already past that point.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 03:00 AM
1

Might be worth reading my similar experience, including my experience with the courts. It's a huge wall of text, but includes more violence from the woman. It's up as a top-level comment on this thread.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:26 PM
10

Well here's my story (WARNING: wall of text. I'll try to break it up some but it's a year's worth of story) BACKSTORY: My girlfriend had been studying abroad. She was coming back into town and I was really excited. Now I live in the middle of nowhere, so I drove to the city she was flying into (~250 miles away). I'm nervous and a little afraid and super excited. Also: I'm 6'4" 235lb (106-107kg, 1.93m), and I have a close buzz cut. Balding for the win. INCIDENT: I need to kill the rest of the day…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:20 PM
1

Oh you're absolutely right there. But I think that's coming from a reactionary mindset, of looking for something to fight, of looking for an enemy. And the more "different" the enemy it is, the easier it is to vilify them. It's NOT the way to go about things, but it's definitely something that goes on around here. Frankly I think too much time is spent criticizing feminism at all, regardless of its members' respective sexual orientations. The most common complaint I've heard about MRAs is the ov…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 08:46 AM
2

Well in general advocacy groups are comprised of people who are motivated and dedicated to the cause. That's how it should be. Now, you can't just force dedication on someone, they have to find that themselves. And self-interest is a great motivator. So it makes sense that advocacy groups rise out of self-interest, and in terms of building a strong-willed movement, that's what works best. It's why feminism is more heavily populated by women, why the MRM has more men. As for myself, I know that I…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 08:35 AM
1

Oh I agree completely as regards sexual orientation, gender, race, age, etc. Things you cannot change are not a something to criticize but something to understand and respect. Criticizing something fundamental about another person is not an issue? I didn't say or imply this at all. I was using a criticism of my friend to say that criticism and respect can coexist. And the criticism was about personality and the way they carry discussions, which are certainly changeable. The non-issues I mentione…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:47 AM
1

To be fair, you're the one who brought lesbian feminists into this thread, as a primary concern. Of course it's going to be discussed. If you're looking for relevance, that's it right there. As for the rest, I'll just spitball here for the sake of playing devil's advocate. Our partners are among the most important relationships in our lives. We advocate most strongly for ourselves and those closest to us. That's only natural. What happens when those two fall within the same gender? Wouldn't it t…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 06:51 AM
1

I can't imagine a method in which a someone could criticize you as a person respectfully, that contrasts the whole concept of respect. I feel as though you tend to have alarmist tendencies, crying out against things that have not yet become, are not, or will not be problems. And it makes a lot of your friends uneasy. Not geared towards you, but a friend of mine. They tend to make friends, get comfortable enough with them to talk about issues, and then flood conversation with things that (to most…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 06:26 AM
5

While I don't think violence is generally warranted, I would like to note something I just realized: Even in hitting her, he's still treating her differently than he would a man. If that were a man, he'd plant a right hook in the guy's jaw, not a slap. He'd try to break the dude. Nothing beyond that, just a realization.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:41 AM
13

WARNING: This turned into a very long post. TLDR: Reactions regarding male agency and representation, BONUS STORY TIME, back into gender discussion roundup. I've really only reached a place of forming coherent arguments on one point: speech/representation/agency. The very idea that men should have means of entering the realm of gender discussion in a more cohesive, organized manner. That in gender discussion, men are largely ignored because of a privilege bias. That we do not, as a general rule,…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:22 AM
1

Exactly. Most engineers are not in that top echelon. And so they don't land those jobs, get those perks, etc.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:17 AM
4

Reasonable things... if you work at one of the big companies. And they're looking to make work as hassle-free as possible so you put more time in. It makes sense from the companies' standpoints, it costs them far less than additional salary and gets them a better worker for more hours.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 03:33 PM
4

I think we've witnessed a solid "whoosh" here.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:44 PM
2

Umm. That says "Meh" not "Men"
/r/MensRights02/05/13 08:43 AM
1

We should work to improve our world (teach people not to harass). At the same time, common sense is to learn to adapt to the world we live in (how to avoid harassment). Because the fact is, we live in a world where people DO harass others. We should be doing both.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:23 AM
-1

It doesn't strike me as though there are omissions here, it reads fairly matter-of-fact. What really gets me is the following: She waited for him to come home (premeditation) She didn't just use one weapon, she found the chance to use four. That means she stuck around and pressed the assault. Note that all four are very easily deadly weapons. Three months jail time (what?!)
/r/MensRights26/04/13 11:55 AM
1

Violence is not necessary for it to be terrorism. Bomb threats are just as much terrorism as actual bombs. Causing people to be concerned about their safety just so you can get your point across? That's pretty straightforward. It's terrorism. Granted, it's pretty low on the totem pole, but that's another matter.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:47 PM
2

Well it's the use of terror. It's quite easy to instill terror violently, but even threats can have the desired effect.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:43 PM
1

Obviously in America it does. It's just that that exchange went as follows: You lynched them. Race. I wasn't even referring to race. Right, but race. I was going by the definition, not the connotations. Fine then, race and gender. Lynching isn't the word I would have used. For one, you kind of need a lynch mob for that. And from the sounds of things event staff were pretty much going by the policy of "inappropriate statements are inappropriate". In any case, while reporting things you think are …
/r/MensRights23/03/13 12:11 AM
5

just a box with a heart on it. Take it back.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 10:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter