TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

only_does_reposts Archive

View 1 post and 141 comments by only_does_reposts on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
75

only_does_reposts/r/MensRights22/10/13 11:59 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

That's Phil Fish, another SJW game dev although I don't know anything about his involvement here except that he does support ZQ.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:32 PM
4

start recording interviews...
/r/MensRights07/03/14 07:44 AM
3

There's a very strong overlap. source: posted excerpt from my socio text here last semester
/r/MensRights19/02/14 12:45 AM
10

Men do virgin-shame each other occasionally, it usually works differently than slut-shaming and more often than not isn't even factually accurate. But men do call other men virgins like it's a bad thing.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 01:35 AM
1

Well, that's a bit extreme, I don't know if you can actually say that...
/r/MensRights11/02/14 05:05 AM
6

gtfo
/r/MensRights07/02/14 03:49 AM
1

take your "man academy" bullshit elsewhere
/r/MensRights03/12/13 02:42 PM
1

As you seem to have noticed in your experience, the extremes will use shaming tactics and propaganda quite freely.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 09:12 PM
4

this means nothing without the field of your degree. STEM women will have guaranteed jobs waiting for them on graduation...
/r/MensRights14/11/13 03:39 AM
2

read the original article - this was in Europe.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 03:36 AM
1

ah, fair enough. didn't take note of the timestamp.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 07:13 PM
-1

Some of them, yes, but most bad ones were in fact downvoted.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 07:09 PM
0

duplicate
/r/MensRights08/11/13 06:48 PM
7

It would be disingenuous of me to suggest otherwise :)
/r/MensRights08/11/13 05:55 PM
4

disingenuity*
/r/MensRights08/11/13 05:47 PM
2

And they are - if you file them at the police station. If you just post it on twitter - they are! or should be, under some form of libel law. I haven't done the research.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 02:24 AM
5

Mister F
/r/MensRights08/11/13 02:18 AM
1

quality journalism there. and yet. check your biases. we had no story from the other party in the 83% alimony case either.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 02:14 AM
0

good query from one who capitalized after a colon
/r/MensRights06/11/13 11:37 PM
0

did you not even read it
/r/MensRights06/11/13 11:31 PM
11

No. Your own biases present men as oppressors. This poster is pretty damned even-handed, with the possible exception of the last line.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 11:30 PM
0

fuck fox news pretty universal, reasonable opinion 14|10 ¯\(ツ)/¯
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:35 PM
2

The man has a petition set up, although it's in spanish.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:39 AM
2

Looking further into it, there seems to be some controversy even there. Now, I'm not terribly interested in debating that, so I'll concede that she understood computing superior to anyone in her time, but that's only in the same manner of importance as the Vikings "discovering" America. Despite this ground work, Babbage's work fell into historical obscurity, and the Analytical Engine was unknown to builders of electro-mechanical and electronic computing machines in the 1930s and 1940s when they …
/r/MensRights04/11/13 06:20 AM
-3

exactly what srs and the feminist subreddit would do. False. You would be banned without discussion or the ability to reply to your adversaries.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 12:20 AM
6

Ada Lovelace invented... No. She translated a paper from French to English and added mathematical commentary, including new equations/methods to use with the analytical computer, a theoretical invention (not built) conceptualized by Charles Babbage five years earlier. At best she was described as a computer programmer.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 11:51 PM
1

have you not read the why link?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:51 PM
3

yikes.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:13 PM
2

Camaraderie* Good post though.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 01:12 AM
1

Do they hold themselves as above the law?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 01:10 AM
1

They don't use them (Thanks RCC, you dogmatic bastards)
/r/MensRights01/11/13 12:04 AM
5

pathologized boy behavior a masculine culture that looks down on reading I honestly think these are the biggest problems. As a child, I read almost pure fiction, read tons of what you would probably call unsuitable material, had an entirely female teaching staff wrt English and literature and spelling (first male teacher: grade 6) and yet my language skills were and are top-notch and have been. I do not recall being affected by the bullet points mentioned whatsoever - generally great teachers an…
/r/MensRights31/10/13 11:10 PM
3

men/female ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights31/10/13 11:01 PM
2

Then you'll have a cake
/r/MensRights31/10/13 10:51 PM
9

He's making a point. He'd be dissing your wife if he called her a fat slob.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 10:40 PM
1

I think the issue is nobody has any idea what the actual meaning is, and assume pedophile = child molester. As has been said, the media is to blame for this, as it makes absolutely no distinction.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 04:05 PM
1

You're not wrong, but any advertising or awareness campaign must play on public perception, and the general public is unaware or apathetic.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 06:08 AM
3

Feminism has always been radical relative to its society. That doesn't mean it wasn't important or sensible, but radfems now are no different from anarcho-capitalists in their departure from reason.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 02:03 AM
5

I don't think sympathy for a war volunteer is nearly as accessible as sympathy and/or anger on behalf of a victim of the maternal court system/DV/rape.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 01:46 AM
-2

Sorry to intrude... I'm a human that thinks you used the word 'offencive' which is, as you apparently don't know, not actually a word. You probably meant 'inoffensive.' Pretend it was a typo. p.s. All modern browsers have built-in spellcheck.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 10:42 PM
6

Ann Coulter is a real life version of the internet troll, I can't take anything associated with her seriously.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 01:04 AM
8

Now, I remain open to the possibility that this is just being inflammatory to inspire debate on their little blog or whatever, but quite skeptical. I took this picture over a month ago, debating whether or not they were serious, but I'm usually pretty good at sniffing it out and the tone here does not read as anything but the usual textbook matter-of-fact to me. None of the other, similar boxes seem to say anything close to the highlighted. There's one about abortion that plays both sides quite …
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:02 AM
1

Also alt + 2 for those of us browsing on 
/r/MensRights22/10/13 11:41 PM
1

Google's algorithms do change quite frequently, especially as of late.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 11:39 PM
7

At least it actually used an apparently authentic academic reference.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 11:29 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights22/10/13 11:04 PM
1

Silence can be consent depending on the context. For example, the bankers riding golden parachutes while America crumbles is outrageous, but if nobody dissents, maybe it's fine.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 07:18 AM
1

always, always, ALWAYS, ALWAYS put the /s tag. /s
/r/MensRights07/10/13 04:13 PM
5

(Eating meat) is really on the same moral level as child abuse. It’s the same thing. I can't take this seriously
/r/MensRights04/10/13 03:56 AM
5

Except all of the authorities?
/r/MensRights03/10/13 10:23 PM
2

No, it's theirs. Just no apostrophe.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 04:44 AM
1

Democratic Socialism.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 11:15 PM
17

The Puritans may have died out a long time ago, but their prudishness lives on quite well.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:11 PM
5

jail for rape jk
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:08 PM
2

Entertainment, I would imagine.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:48 PM
2

Boycotts haven't done anything in a long time, and the ~70k of us here aren't going to accomplish shit even if 100% of us participated.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 04:58 AM
2

I was only aware of the one post.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 07:28 PM
1

It's a serious issue and well written, you might be surprised.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 01:44 PM
2

I'm sorry, there seems to be some miscommunication. I'm not quite sure what you're talking about, but it seems you think I'm attacking this position. It's called the apex fallacy because it's assumed (by feminism in particular for the context I'm familiar with) that men are all at the top (the apex) and women are all at the bottom. Hence oppression. This is a fallacy, because men are also vastly more concentrated at the bottom. As far as data goes, the vast majority of the homeless and imprisone…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 02:53 AM
1

Do you know your 19th and early 20th century history?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 02:10 AM
2

Typically referred to as the apex fallacy.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:58 AM
2

Have three
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:33 PM
3

LGBTs want privileges?
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:40 AM
1

A lot, probably. Human response time is pretty pathetic compared to a computer's. Overcorrection runs rampant as well.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:33 AM
3

because men are not as capable of being empathetic B-b-but that's a 'biotruth'!
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:13 AM
2

I have the same with 10.7.5
/r/MensRights08/08/13 10:48 PM
1

Sex becomes a bigger deal when it's involuntary.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 10:17 PM
39

This subreddit is pretty good at downvoting its own misogynistic members most of the time. We neither need nor want your "pity brigading".
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:09 PM
1

Welcome to subreddits...
/r/MensRights01/08/13 04:23 AM
1

Well they don't have physical tests for no reason...
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:20 AM
1

wat
/r/MensRights27/07/13 07:27 PM
1

Because physical strength?
/r/MensRights27/07/13 07:26 PM
1

Ah yes, the freedom to oppress people.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 07:09 PM
3

I have an /s delivery for a Mr. dungone, will you sign here please?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 09:01 PM
2

Caucasian students receive a disproportionately greater share of merit-based institutional grants, Caucasian students are more likely to have higher grades Lower-income receive more need-based grants, obviously. Merit receieve more merit-based grants. Seems OK to me, what's the problem? There's also a bit about private scholarships overwhelmingly affecting caucasians, but it's more of a cultural thing ("white sports" scholarships like swimming, wrestling) than anything else. I received a small s…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:41 PM
1

I know it's a legitimate concept, just wanted to give you some advice.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:19 PM
4

In raw numbers or some sort of meaningful measure?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:17 PM
2

You should know that using the word privilege won't get you a lot of traction in these parts
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:12 PM
1

It's, uhh, yours.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:42 AM
2

Nobody needs anything
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:19 PM
1

You're right, but you got the elaboration on why wrong
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:11 PM
3

It's supposed to drive home the smack-in-the-face-spicy vibe, I think.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:08 PM
8

Please implement a NP rule or disallow this sort of thing altogether, as we seem to have more of these reddit links as of late and since we're not SRS we may be shut down like other subs of late
/r/MensRights20/07/13 01:35 AM
3

Please don't turn this sub into an SRS downbrigade
/r/MensRights20/07/13 12:34 AM
0

Wow, really? I thought a fairly large part of Mad Men and Peggy Olson's character was illustrating just how bad it was for women who worked back then. I always knew it was bad, of course, but it is in absolutely no way reflected in today's workplace, holy shitfucking hyperbole.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 06:15 PM
2

I'll see if I can whip something up that looks more like a fun infographic, should be good practice :)
/r/MensRights19/07/13 06:06 PM
1

That's true, but at least it's not WoW-style bikini armor right?
/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:29 AM
2

Skyrim style is pretty great, haven't seen any real life examples unfortunately.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:21 PM
1

Can mothers do so without consent of the father?
/r/MensRights17/07/13 08:12 PM
1

No person is killed by abortion either...
/r/MensRights17/07/13 08:11 PM
3

Are you familiar with George Carlin? Tons of his material aren't jokes either.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:51 PM
0

I checked the site out for the first time from her link, immediate and multiple red flags with the "Living In The Matrix" heading and specifically the reference that followed it, "Take The Red Pill". After reading other comments here explaining it a bit better and going over the site more slowly, it's much more palatable, but easy to see how it gives off that impression at first glance.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:55 PM
2

I used to hold the same opinion, until I saw a good post describing why that 'advice' is treated as blaming a while ago in one of the larger subs, maybe bestof. To my chagrin I did not save it. The gist of it was this: don't you think those people already know that? You're just piling shit on top of shit that they already regret. It accomplishes nothing but making them feel worse. Yes, becoming wasted/high/incapacitated is not the best of ideas. However, it's also no excuse for rape or other act…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:39 PM
1

As they say about your chance of reaching the front page in the defaults, it's all about timing. Maybe the demographic that votes x way hasn't seen the post yet, for example. Context doesn't hurt either.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:30 PM
1

Well, depending on your definition of upper hand... There's certainly different opportunities for the different sexes. Men have a chance to get into professional sports (granted, a very very small field) and get paid quite a lot to play. For the purpose of a career, women's sports practically don't exist. Men can, by virtue of biological differences, better take on physically demanding but highly rewarding jobs such as welding, roughneck (oil hands), construction, etc. Women don't have to worry …
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:24 PM
3

We're used to it.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:15 PM
1

huehuehue
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:08 PM
5

Don't forget point no. 2
/r/MensRights14/07/13 03:21 AM
5

It really depends where they're at, 30k salary in a lot of areas is the median household income, so pretty good. In crazy urban areas, that might be rent+car+utilities+food
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:28 PM
3

You can take a screenshot of the website, can't you? You can save it as a .html file which will open it even if the site itself is offline.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:40 PM
2

In the real world uncontroversial topics aren't discussed. This brings visibility and a media spotlight, practically the only way to accomplish anything.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:57 AM
13

At least two of those articles are only citing prosecuted false accusations, while at the same time talking about unprosecuted AND unreported rapes. They also didn't get an interview of any kind with anyone who supported the posters. Totally balanced coverage. edit: I forgot to mention we've had several topics here on this front page that mention false accusers not being prosecuted at all, something else the article completely omits.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:40 AM
1

You want to restrict women's reproductive rights. I'm the tyrant.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 04:50 PM
2

so funny
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:31 PM
1

I didn't downvote you. I'm also not a policymaker, so I would probably consult some of them. I do know that spite is not the way to advance.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:43 PM
2

In the U.S., private sector teaching pays more than public, which is one of many contributing factors to the poor state of education.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 09:10 PM
5

People are missing your reference, but I got it.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 09:07 PM
2

Which is self-contradicting. Just thought you should know.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 04:30 PM
6

another failed attempt at a humorous comeback you have no sense or concept of humor Well humor is subjective
/r/MensRights09/07/13 04:01 PM
1

I don't have words for how dumb that position is. Spiteful protest is all that it is, and not even remotely plausibly effective at that.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:34 AM
3

This is standard among all crime cases; were it not so, the alleged could sue for slander.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:29 PM
3

that doesn't make any sense
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:12 PM
1

Please do and downvote that stuff to improve the sub :)
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:06 PM
1

All right candidate anon, you look like a great fit for the company. Let me just google your name... oh... well, we'll call you.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:25 AM
4

Pay or go to directly to jail; do not collect $200 How isn't that violent?
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:23 AM
1

Umm. They are. If the individual person does not meet the requirements, they are not hired. This isn't a "don't hire women because they aren't as strong," this is "Hire qualified applicants," only it's gone wrong since they relaxed the standards for political correctness.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:15 AM
3

Hillary Clinton said it way back when, hopefully someone will come along and provide the source (can't find it myself)
/r/MensRights02/07/13 02:09 AM
1

Luckily, kitties and doggies are safe. Ponies are off limits though.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 03:19 PM
1

You're so privileged you're above spelling
/r/MensRights28/06/13 09:09 PM
2

0 years in the OP's article have you ever heard of 0 years for a male in the same situation?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 09:06 PM
2

All I said is that it was a choice. It's obviously not a flippant decision, but neither is career woman or homebody. I agree with you in that it's obviously not something to be taken lightly, but nothing I said in my original comment indicates one way or the other – seems like you may have read my comment directly in context to your story. It was not a personal reply (or it would have been a PM) but one for the thread's discussion in general.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:22 AM
10

A child has been a choice since '73
/r/MensRights28/05/13 03:55 AM
1

Can't do that, language is formed by the patriarchy /s
/r/MensRights25/05/13 08:30 PM
0

Apparently an open mind is not welcome in /r/MensRights. A shame, really. I'd rather not have it turn into a clone of srs or feminism where only agreeable viewpoints are valid.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:42 PM
0

I don't think he's saying to love and embrace feminism ;)
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:05 PM
1

"What are you gonna do, stab me?" – Last words of man stabbed to death
/r/MensRights21/04/13 02:42 AM
12

Call Saul!
/r/MensRights20/04/13 07:25 PM
23

Except in that case
/r/MensRights20/04/13 07:14 PM
1

While certainly not a flattering comparison... yes.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 05:54 PM
6

Social expectations in general are unrealistic
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:42 AM
0

Anyone can be a journalist; it is neither a trade guild nor a licensed profession.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:57 AM
1

It may be unlikely, but that doesn't mean it can't happen.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:46 AM
1

After a certain point, "No True Scotsman" no longer holds any value. Radfems no longer meet the definition, so it's not fallacious.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:45 AM
1

It certainly can be used in that context, and getting it used in such a context is exactly what we're fighting for. noun a person who advocates or supports such a principle.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:41 AM
1

While that may be correct, without anything further this is just conjecture.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:16 AM
2

The draft is what happens when they select you. You know, when you mandatorily signed up. You've already been drafted, along with every other male 18+, we just haven't been officially enlisted yet.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 05:40 AM
1

The draft is what happens when they select you. You know, when you mandatorily signed up. You've already been drafted, along with every other male 18+, we just haven't been officially enlisted yet.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 05:40 AM
1

Well it's the Daily Fail, you expect people to pay attention to that?
/r/MensRights16/04/13 09:32 AM
1

But pen0rs :(
/r/MensRights01/04/13 09:22 AM
1

I'm not sure how this factors in, but he's the lead singer of a seemingly popular band — public figure?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 11:06 AM
10

Who can you respect anymore? Almost every online site does this shit.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 07:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter