TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ono412 Archive

View 1 post and 44 comments by ono412 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

ono412/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:31 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That might be true if the only utility the military served was a stereotypical infantry soldier. The military however has a vast majority of jobs from accountants to captains to air traffic controllers and more which do not require strength to the same levels. So we have to redraw the curves, we can't stick to one stereotypical set of curves to describe all soldiers based on sex. It should be based on the occupation inside the military whether or not they are the best candidate. Not their sex.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 02:41 PM
1

She drew two overlapping bell curves. Said the one to the left is women, the one to the right is men. We know at least the top 10-20% of women are more physically able then the bottom 10% of men. Then she shaded in the overlap and said you can't allow one and not the other or your determination is based purely on sex, which is sexism. I agreed
/r/MensRights15/08/18 11:37 AM
1

I believe in thoroughly researching a topic before dismissing it ignorantly. They had some valid points of order, especially in the early classes, had GREAT teachers early on who stressed ideas like if Women shouldn't be allowed in the military then neither should weak men, if that is your standard of acceptance. And we discussed extensively the logic behind it and the pros and cons. Not about whether it was offensive or sexist, but logistically and intellectually taking sex out of it. That's wh…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 03:07 AM
1

I was an EE major, took it to hear the other side. Enjoyed the debate and discussion at the beginning, was disappointed when I got to the end. Was kind of like Scientology in that way.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 02:25 AM
1

Tried to write a paper on this in a 4000 level Womens Studies class for a conference and the prof rejected it saying "It might not go over well and were looking for other.....perspectives." Took an F dropped out of WS then and there. Fuck Virginia Techs WS department. Was one of the only Males to try it, and almost minor in it. the whole major is a JOKE
/r/MensRights14/08/18 10:04 PM
1

Because we dont want for hire marketers being the determination of what is acceptable and desireable, where as we elect congressman and councilmen to make those decisions. Marketers should target everyone to get the largest profit, as is there jobs, if we want to limit that we should do so legally, if we dont want to limit it, we shouldnt blame those just doing their job of some grand conspiracy to promote unhealthiness.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 09:06 PM
4

So...just like over half of Bernie's career in congressional voting. He is almost always the throwaway vote and rarely a deciding vote. Its also easy not to be bought when your vote isn't worth much.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 03:04 PM
1

Everyone will be scared of separate but equal after the last time didn't go so well.....
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:02 PM
0

Yes, but we are still evolving. We haven't stopped. As such, we shouldn't close the door to 50% of the populations potential just because it has historically been that way. I can tell by the way you phrase things and call people with different ideas morons that you don't particularly like change or ideas that negate your own. So neither of us are going to get anything out of discussing this further and I wish you luck with your world view.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:37 PM
-1

You're argument is of natural course of human growth, that females were in the bottom because of nature and the inherent conditions there of. If you want to stick to that them you also have to accept that human development has reached a point where strength and murder are no longer acceptable in our developed society so the traits that initially led to their lack of confidence becoming a social trend must be socially rejected in our current world. Just because gender roles started naturally, doe…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:04 PM
1

I wasn't arguing...just throwing in what I've heard as a counter argument in my research. Relax man not everything has to be a cut your enemies head off debate.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 01:47 PM
3

I've never heard the monetary reward study. Sounds interesting and I'd love to read it. I read that article back when I took women's studies, I'll see if I can find it but that was sophomore year of college so it's a while back lol
/r/MensRights11/04/15 12:48 PM
3

It's a human trait not a female trait. Perception affects performance in low confidence areas and due to social stigma this includes what is considered an unfair disadvantage to women outside their control limiting them from success in those fields. It's a perpetuation that causes most of the feminist argument to encourage stem fields. I think that's why the over sell bias articles about women success in stem fields to attempt to trick the stereotypes into unhindered success in a sense.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 12:45 PM
6

You are correct. The same study did the test on minorities and had similar effects to that of women where as white males had no effect. In feminism they call that an obstacle of negative perception that makes the path to success harder for those stereotyped groups.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 12:41 PM
14

Studies have shown that women who are told before a test in math and science that "men typically score higher on this test" will score lower than the control group while men in the same circumstances saw no change. So there is some validity to women and perceived value in those fields.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 11:52 AM
0

I never claimed to be an expert. In fact I used the words "may" to describe my assumption. "healthy standard for one sex by anatomy/biology may not be the same as the healthy standard for the other." How was that confidently? I used an extreme example in heart attack, but thats the kind of extreme circumstance they are looking. You say they dont do iscaemic heart disease crap, but they definetly look at medical history and weed out based on it. Also, I took women's studies for 4 years before qui…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:21 PM
0

99% of men are stronger than women by nature. Men are taller on average. Men weight more on average. An out of shape male can take longer strides and finish a mile in 10 min, while an in shape girl will have to use more muscle operations (steps) to achieve the same thing and actually be in shape. If it is a measure of health and not of strength, they have to be seperated because what is healthy standard for one sex by anatomy/biology may not be the same as the healthy standard for the other. As …
/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:00 PM
1

But that excludes the fact that what a "fit" man and a "fit" women can do is by nature weaker for women. So for a desk job in the military where the minimum is to be "fit" and healthy as determined by a test would have to be set by different standards for men then for women.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:03 AM
-9

As if infantry is the only thing the military offers....if anything its the least used role in the us military. I just agreed that for things of that nature, it makes sense, but you're being ignorant if that's the ONLY Avenue women can help
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:30 AM
-14

It's a physical fitness test, not a strength test. Therefore to determine whether the individual is healthy or not should change based on sex because women can be healthy and "fit" but still not have the same strength as men. This one makes sense to me, not the special forces crap
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:26 PM
1

O wow thank you friend! If you actually looked at my history you would see my posts in r/feminism and r/MensRights asking for recommended resources, funny enough r/MensRights was firing them off citing personal stories as well as great .gov and research sites. r/femenism kind of vilified me and wrote it off.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 04:31 PM
18

I was a women's studies minor in college up until I had to write a paper and I wanted to write it on the exact topic mentioned in the article. The discrepancy between fathers and mothers in custody cases. I was going to do it as a research paper based on the numbers. When my numbers proved the discrimination toward men (slightly) i was told to go in a different direction with my paper because that topic might not bode well for the audience of the conference. That is the day I swore off feminism …
/r/MensRights27/09/14 08:36 AM
1

I would recommend the feminist perspective of circumcision. I studied women's studies as a minor in college and suprisingly most feminists are completely against the idea of circumcision. This might help and may give you some baseline to argue with her on her level.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 08:36 PM
1

Not for my current paper, thank you for trying!
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:12 AM
1

Wow you are awesome! This will help so much! Thank you!
/r/MensRights24/03/14 12:16 AM
1

Thank you so much for the support! Thanks for the link!
/r/MensRights23/03/14 04:38 PM
1

I believe this would be a great solution! If we have more men at the table for debate more women would listen. The problem I see is we hide behind message boards and blog posts instead of contributing to the growing academic research with our own data.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 04:37 PM
1

I really appreciate your thought out, well-written response. Do you have any sources that I could use to substantiate these numbers/claims?
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:33 AM
1

This would be a bold statement if I wrote the whole paper on cases that were flipped and then last sentence reveal that they were actually on the male side the entire time.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:31 AM
1

Did not know this existed, great suggestion!
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:29 AM
1

I understand your concern and perhaps I should have asked here first before picking my topic, but as it has already been chosen and locked in, I'm going with it. Thank you for your suggestions!
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:29 AM
1

You sir/ma'am, Are awesome.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:26 AM
2

Science is inherently man made and therefore affected by social constructs like gender. For example, any of these sources go in to depth the way gender norms have shaped science in an invalid way. Rogers, Lesley. 2011. “Sex Differences are Not Hardwired.” In Fisher, 2011. Spanier, Bonnie and Jessica Horowitz. “Looking for Difference? Methodology Is in the Eye of the Beholder.” In Fisher, 2011. Wassmann, Claudia. Evaluating Threat, Solving Mazes, and Having the Blues: Gender Difference in Brain-I…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:26 AM
1

This would only give me the perspective of those who have done the same. Not the perspective of feminist scholars and the best feminism has to offer to defend their position against my critiques. It's kind of like going to the priests with my questions of god instead of just any old christian. If that makes sense?
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:20 AM
1

I believe the conference is early May. I will obviously have to have the paper submitted earlier most likely late April. Not sure on the specific date, but I'll keep MR updated! Thanks for your help!
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:19 AM
1

Sorry for the confusion, My minor is Gender, Science, and Technology. The class is required for minor and is called Women's Studies Senior Seminar. The other class is one where we explore transhumans, bionics, artificial intelligence, and the digital reality. This is the part as an electrical engineer I practically fap to :P
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:18 AM
1

Thank you! I appreciate your help!
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:15 AM
2

That's quite the binary you created...
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:14 AM
6

I'm sorry you feel that way, perhaps this could change your view. I have gotten more attention and more job offers because of my minor than anything else. It is so unique it helps me stand out and its justifiable for Electrical Engineers because it applies to the cultural and social influences of technology and many of the moralities behind our understanding of "progress". I never said that I wanted to end or hurt feminism. I would rather both parties come to the same table and fight for their o…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 11:50 PM
2

I'm confused? You mean opt out of the minor? I chose to do the minor to challenge myself to hear both sides of the opinion. I enjoy the minor immensely because regardless of the stereotype, feminist academics are very open to challenging their own thinking and enjoy comparing facts and statistics as much as Men's Rights supporters.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 07:06 PM
1

I just want statistics and analysis on the equality of custody trials. I was coming in with the hypothesis that men are less likely to be given custody due to the cultural gender belief in maternal instinct, needing a mother, etc.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 05:52 PM
1

Could you give me sources to support this? See here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/212waz/serious_need_the_help_from_mr_for_women_studies/
/r/MensRights22/03/14 04:11 PM
1

Could you give me sources to support this. See here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/212waz/serious_need_the_help_from_mr_for_women_studies/
/r/MensRights22/03/14 04:11 PM
2

Thank you for your resources! I will be sure to look into it and give it value in my paper.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter