onomatopoeiawording Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
26	Misinformation is being put out that aznidentity is an MRA sub after a Slate article was written falsely associating aznidentity with MRAs and actor Simu Liu being accused of posting on aznidentity	Anti-MRM	onomatopoeiawording	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 01:08 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	The MensRights sub seems to be turning feminist on us. Been an MRA for over ten years, yet one quip gets me a three day ban. Suss. No, most MRAs are still on reddit and twitter. Spaces like Gab and other mainstream social media alternatives are full of traditionalists that are completely hostile to the concept of men's rights.	/r/AntiFeminists	25/01/22 06:42 AM
3	The MensRights sub seems to be turning feminist on us. Been an MRA for over ten years, yet one quip gets me a three day ban. Suss. Gab and Gettr don't have a strong men's rights presence nor are they likely to because of the strongly traditionalist leaning presence on those platforms. Reddit and twitter are still far better for men's rights activism, you just have to find men's rights subs that are more even-handed with moderation men's rights reddit subs and make sure you block known false reporters and trolls from the start on twitter. Speaking of reddit, found another example of a post retroactively deleted by mods on th…	/r/AntiFeminists	25/01/22 06:40 AM
1	The MensRights sub seems to be turning feminist on us. Been an MRA for over ten years, yet one quip gets me a three day ban. Suss. The redpill is so far removed from a men's rights context now. It's currently more about culture wars, race and conspiracy theory fear mongering than anything men's rights related. Many people that identify as "redpill" are also hostile against the very concept of men's rights. It's not a label worth sticking by or identifying with if you care about and want to engage in men's rights activism.	/r/AntiFeminists	21/01/22 03:44 AM
2	The MensRights sub seems to be turning feminist on us. Been an MRA for over ten years, yet one quip gets me a three day ban. Suss. on a supposedly MRA space that is at least as censorious They are censorious of MRAs that post things that upset tradcons.	/r/AntiFeminists	21/01/22 02:21 AM
3	The MensRights sub seems to be turning feminist on us. Been an MRA for over ten years, yet one quip gets me a three day ban. Suss. The posts I linked show evidence of the mods' traditionalist stances and agenda. It explains everything about how they act: from how they show leniency to trolls in the name of "free speech" (while banning those that speak out against those trolls), promote and pin traditionalist talking points, hold men to higher standards than women, retroactively remove posts that don't push a traditionalist outlook and ultimately discourage any real progress on equality for men if it goes against their conce…	/r/AntiFeminists	21/01/22 02:19 AM
4	The MensRights sub seems to be turning feminist on us. Been an MRA for over ten years, yet one quip gets me a three day ban. Suss. There is evidence of the mods on that sub being traditionalists and not actually interested in furthering or supporting men's rights. This explains why they have for so long allowed feminist and tradcon trolls to come in and harass any men's rights activist posters, ban MRAs that speak out against such trolls, and retroactively remove posts that go against a traditionalist agenda: https://np.reddit.com/r/Pro_Male_Collective/comments/qhxoqa/misandrist_bigots_that_lie_about_selective/ https://np.r…	/r/AntiFeminists	21/01/22 12:27 AM
3	Lawmakers drop proposal to add women to the draft More so than emailing them, you need to vote against them when they come up for re-election or where they are running against incumbents, provided you live in their district. This is done by voting for one of their challengers (ideally a challenger that is way less enthusiastic about anti-male policies or hasn't made it a focus like these politicians have). It's difficult to find out who candidates are running against by reading the news, so a quick source to find this out without having to wa…	/r/MensRights	07/12/21 08:32 PM
6	Little victory! Finally Reddit Gets It's Act Together And Bans These Bigots. r/thepinkpills taken down. I hope that FDS will be also banned soon.. It was a ban evasion sub for r/pinkpillfeminism, r/blackpillfeminism and r/gendercritical. Screenshot	/r/AntiFeminists	05/12/21 07:21 PM
3	Hawley moving to block Dem attempts to include women in military draft Not only Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) but Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) (https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2021293; see everyone who voted "NAY/NO" on the drop-down menu under Votes) and senators that have expressed opposition to having any change to the current male only system of conscription Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) Senator James Lankford (R-OK) Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) Senator Roger F. Wicker (R-MS) Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) Senator Tom Co…	/r/AntiFeminists	02/11/21 07:08 AM
3	"mEN NeeD To LEARn how TO haNdle RejECtIon" meanwhile this is how women handle rejection. Because media wants to be sold, making the profit for owners. Feminism bullshit always sells good. No, you see this is a view that makes light of or downplays misandry in the media as just another cynical tactic. It absolves misandrist women in the media of personal blame and instead attributes the misandry in the media to the media just unethically trying to engage in clickbait or simply going after what sells. These people aren't just engaging it for the fun of it or because it pisses certai…	/r/AntiFeminists	21/10/21 10:42 AM
3	"mEN NeeD To LEARn how TO haNdle RejECtIon" meanwhile this is how women handle rejection. What is becoming apparent about the blatant double standard and one-sided fear mongering is that a lot of radical feminists and those that are sympathetic with femcels and women's interests above men's have gotten their way into the media. The reporting by media in recent years on gender issues is definitely not objective by any measure, and seems more like thinly disguised venting of feminist ideologues. Of course. It's the same newspaper who published the "My perfect affair – how I’m getting…	/r/AntiFeminists	21/10/21 09:40 AM
2	In our gynocentric society women never are guilty for anything. People always want to justify them, even if we talk about women-murderers.. Also "a prostituted woman" is nothing more than radfem stupid newspeak. Feminism is a mental illness No, it's just willful bigotry. They certainly don't allow personal frustrations by men or antifeminist speech to be excused with "mental illness", so nobody should give them that excuse either.	/r/AntiFeminists	20/10/21 06:25 PM
9	The way this sub likes to blame literally all men for the actions of an extreme minority is exactly why our sub exist. Fuck everyone on that sub. Talk and fearmongering of "male violence" is just a dogwhistle by radical feminists, used to justify misandrist policies like proposed curfews for men, monitoring and criminalization of antifeminist communities, and justifying male only conscription with the idea that "men start all the wars". Also it's strange they are not blaming the police for stepping in sooner and going with the argument by the police that blamed bystanders (some of were undoubtedly women given that this occurred on public …	/r/AntiFeminists	20/10/21 05:59 PM
7	"mEN NeeD To LEARn how TO haNdle RejECtIon" meanwhile this is how women handle rejection. The Guardian already is. Appearance-based discrimination, termed “lookism” by femcel communities, is not the only reason that some women struggle to find a sexual partner. The risk of male violence has always been a concern, but the semi-anonymous nature of app-based dating has increased these fears for many women. “Misogyny is an ideology which dictates that women should be seen as objects, without the same rights as men. Misandry is mostly a reaction to misogyny and informed by evidence. We …	/r/AntiFeminists	20/10/21 05:41 PM
6	"mEN NeeD To LEARn how TO haNdle RejECtIon" meanwhile this is how women handle rejection. Meanwhile The Guardian writes sympathetic articles about femcels while condemning the male equivalent and makes excuses for misandry and downplays the violence that it can cause “Misogyny is an ideology which dictates that women should be seen as objects, without the same rights as men. Misandry is mostly a reaction to misogyny and informed by evidence. We shouldn’t put all men in the same bag, but at the same time it’s hard to criticise women who have had negative experiences.” https://archive.…	/r/AntiFeminists	20/10/21 05:36 PM
4	feminism: selective gender equality only when it benefits women donate to NCFM Here is the link for anyone interested http://www.ncfmmembers.org/donate/cgi-bin/form.pl The men's rights organization NCFM is headquartered in the US but is still considered a global men's rights organization. Supporting men's rights issues like the right not to be conscripted just because you were born male (reminder that trans women assigned male at birth are still currently required to sign up for selective service when they turn 18) also has an effect of making it more likely…	/r/AntiFeminists	15/10/21 02:51 AM
1	She was fortunately banned. So don't be silent or passive when you see female's hate offenses. These comments were in response to my screenshotted posts of an IncelTear thread where the comments were mocking "shortcels" and making jokes about them engaging in leg lengthening surgery. IncelTear isn't typically known as a radical feminist sub but this shows that rhetoric on that sub is already appealing to radical feminists and they feel protective of allowing that to continue.	/r/AntiFeminists	07/10/21 07:26 PM
2	Tradcon chivalry if fully compatible with feminism. Feminism isn't nothing more than expansion of this phenomenon. Just look at FDS feminists views. Especially when they talk about relationships and society, they also enforce servile male gender role. We have to care about men issues, not ideology! This has been commonplace but a good way to see who is really being genuine is seeing where their objectives lie. They may talk about all the same things men's rights activists say but what are their main objectives? If they say things like "equality between men and women is a false ideal", "too many weak men enabling feminism", "there's too many men" they aren't men's rights activists, they are just appropriating the rhetoric of men's rights activists to seem more sophisticated.	/r/AntiFeminists	07/10/21 07:01 PM
3	Single males aren't only commonly smeared, shamed and blamed for not being married or being deselected. They are discriminated by tax policy in many countries. They have to pay taxes for state subsidies and tax breaks for married people and welfare for women who even don't work! They also often side with anti male policies. See Rep. Chip Roy's (R-TX) defense of keeping conscription requirements sex selective and relegated to men only and how his wife influenced his decision on this.	/r/AntiFeminists	07/10/21 06:57 PM
1	Why don't you guys protesting? There's not much to focus on other than legal issues. How people view men is largely out of the control of one MRA and is much more dictated by culture and media. It is of course good to discourage social double standards and raise awareness about it but legal issues are much more pressing. You can mostly ignore other people treating you in a way that isn't ideal. You can't ignore laws and institutional discrimination.	/r/MensRights	07/10/21 05:28 AM
1	Why don't you guys protesting? that's the problem. some idea of masculinity is just primate stupidit doesn't help anyone but their own sense of self There's little one person can do about that. It stems from a large part of what's trending and popular in culture and what the majority of people (or even significant minority) think it means to be a man. It's a dead end worrying about that anyway, look at how opponents of MRAs try to make that the focus (Sam Seder's debate with blueorange22 as an example and his constantly press…	/r/MensRights	07/10/21 03:40 AM
1	Why don't you guys protesting? To be blunt, most men see each other as competition and those that complain about men's rights as losers that aren't adept at navigating in the current system, but there's always going to be naysayers. If you want to protest, more power to you. There are always going to be naysayers and people not really interested in equality that will try to use biological reductionist or appeal to nature arguments to argue against what you are doing. They exist on the other side too. You will never get 100% o…	/r/MensRights	07/10/21 01:18 AM
3	Men don't exist as men except when oppressing women🙄 That tweet is a classic example of victim blaming men that are victims of crime. It's also eerily reminiscent of the bigoted argument that certain racial groups are murdered more and have a lower quality of life because of their alleged participation in gangs. In the true sense, it's a very reactionary and bigoted type of argument and justification to make.	/r/AntiFeminists	27/09/21 08:46 PM
1	Misinformation is being put out that aznidentity is an MRA sub after a Slate article was written falsely associating aznidentity with MRAs and actor Simu Liu being accused of posting on aznidentity Do not listen to things said by manboobz (https://archive.is/5Lpj4) about how MRAs have lost control of their brand. Anytime MRAs are falsely associated with other groups and accused of sharing those unrelated group's bigotry, it can and must be called out.	/r/MensRights	19/09/21 09:18 AM
1	Misinformation is being put out that aznidentity is an MRA sub after a Slate article was written falsely associating aznidentity with MRAs and actor Simu Liu being accused of posting on aznidentity This is a wrong narrative and needs to be called out. Self-love and affirming-self-as-worthy for men is related to men's lifestyle options, not men's rights.	/r/MensRights	19/09/21 09:17 AM
1	Misinformation is being put out that aznidentity is an MRA sub after a Slate article was written falsely associating aznidentity with MRAs and actor Simu Liu being accused of posting on aznidentity It should be expected that MRAs would be hostile to PUAs if PUAs have had a track record of being dismissive to MRA issues from the start, which many of them have. There is nothing saying that men can't have sex with multiple women, however this simply doesn't need to be talked about in the context of men's rights. PUAs bring discussion about dating issues and sizing up other men into the conversation about men's rights and that's what is objected to.	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 11:02 PM
3	Misinformation is being put out that aznidentity is an MRA sub after a Slate article was written falsely associating aznidentity with MRAs and actor Simu Liu being accused of posting on aznidentity I didn't say that. I said that you can't bring a focus on attracting women into men's rights. It's fine if you want to focus on attracting women outside of that in your routine life, but it has nothing to do with advocating for men's legal rights. The issue with PUAs is that they bring their focus on attracting women into discussions about men's rights, making it easier for others to claim that MRAs are only interested in getting laid and no different than PUAs.	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 05:32 PM
4	Misinformation is being put out that aznidentity is an MRA sub after a Slate article was written falsely associating aznidentity with MRAs and actor Simu Liu being accused of posting on aznidentity I don't think that's so much the issue, at least in the articles making this false association between aznidentity and MRAs. The reason they don't like what aznidentity said is that it deals with the people on that sub criticizing asian women's dating choices. Still, that has nothing to do with the MRM and makes this association of aznidentity with MRAs even more tenuous.	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 05:18 PM
1	Misinformation is being put out that aznidentity is an MRA sub after a Slate article was written falsely associating aznidentity with MRAs and actor Simu Liu being accused of posting on aznidentity 24 upvotes man. These are opinions of individuals within the community, and not very popular ones at that. You're monolithing from that minority. I provided accounts from other PUAs like Roosh V, Matt Fourney, and Rollo Tomassi. There are other PUA blogs like Heartiste that I wasn't able to link to since they were taken down a few years ago but they have said much the same. The overwhelming consensus by PUAs is that they look down on MRA issues as pointless to protest over and that it interferes…	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 05:14 PM
3	Misinformation is being put out that aznidentity is an MRA sub after a Slate article was written falsely associating aznidentity with MRAs and actor Simu Liu being accused of posting on aznidentity The insult "MRAsians" has been used for quite a while in asian american feminist media but there has been a series of events where this false association of MRAs with racial identity groups is again being revived. I haven't seen much pushback from anywhere else either. The MRM needs to keep refuting and pointing out these false associations every time it happens. Hopefully once MRM organizations have enough money they can sue the people making these false associations or at least reasonably dema…	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 05:03 PM
6	Misinformation is being put out that aznidentity is an MRA sub after a Slate article was written falsely associating aznidentity with MRAs and actor Simu Liu being accused of posting on aznidentity Men's rights shouldn't be controversial. That people equate it with white nationalism or racial supremacy or personal dating issues shows their bias and unwillingness to consider men as fully human.	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 04:56 PM
4	Misinformation is being put out that aznidentity is an MRA sub after a Slate article was written falsely associating aznidentity with MRAs and actor Simu Liu being accused of posting on aznidentity You did not just link me an no name off brand daytime TV talk show from the 90s, a 10 year old Reddit thread with 24 upvotes, and a few opinion pieces one of which has one whole comment of activity and act like that's the gotcha. You're desperately reaching to find conflict and division that isn't there. You aren't helping men here. The links are evidence of PUAs stance against men's rights that has been present for years now. I'm not trying to find conflict and division. PUA is incompatible wit…	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 04:41 PM
1	Misinformation is being put out that aznidentity is an MRA sub after a Slate article was written falsely associating aznidentity with MRAs and actor Simu Liu being accused of posting on aznidentity PUAs have from the start been hostile to men's rights and trying to pretend that they are anything more than giving men the tools to get laid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d28usWdvmSg&feature=emb_title https://www.rooshv.com/mens-rights-has-become-a-euphemism-for-sexual-loser https://np.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/b8dra/stay_out_of_both_twoxchromosomes_and_mensrights/ https://www.rooshv.com/the-mens-rights-movement-is-dead https://therationalmale.com/2013/06/04/cant-buy-me-alpha/ https://…	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 03:47 PM
12	Misinformation is being put out that aznidentity is an MRA sub after a Slate article was written falsely associating aznidentity with MRAs and actor Simu Liu being accused of posting on aznidentity https://www.dailydot.com/unclick/simu-liu-reddit-history/ https://www.screengeek.net/2021/09/17/simu-liu-old-posts-backlash/ https://districtchronicles.com/years-old-reddit-posts-from-an-account-belonging-to-simu-liu-go-viral/ https://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/121678772.html These above sources are also reporting on Simu Liu (who allegedly posted on the aznidentity sub) as posting on an MRA sub. This is misinformation. aznidentity is NOT an MRA sub and there have been many posts on aznidenti…	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 01:11 PM
4	Honestly looking for groups to donate to really showed me how little society and the government cares for men The National Coalition for Men (NCFM) is one such organization: http://www.ncfmmembers.org/donate/cgi-bin/form.pl If anyone in the United States - or really around the world, since men's rights issues are global and defamation of men's rights groups in the US hurts men's rights globally, even online through making it easier for companies to take down such groups if they are wrongly labeled as hate groups - wants to make a difference please donate to the NCFM. The NCFM has a strong record adv…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/08/21 06:08 AM
2	New Men's Reddit Subs are being INSTANTLY BANNED. We created r/mensrightsfacts as a place to store studies and other academic info, and it was nuked in just a couple of days Do you have proof of this (images, screenshots)? Were they appointed to the reddit admin position recently?	/r/MensRights	12/08/21 08:56 PM
1	The Feminists are coming, the feminist are coming! Top of this thread is now marked Sorry, this post has been removed by the moderators of r/MensRights. Moderators remove posts from feeds for a variety of reasons, including keeping communities safe, civil, and true to their purpose. Even though it wasn't r/MensRights that was going outside of their purpose and trying to ban other subs.	/r/MensRights	12/08/21 08:50 PM
1	The Feminists are coming, the feminist are coming! It will get banned for ban evasion under the excuse that "mgtow" is in the name. You are better off reporting such threads where they blatantly call for brigading and deplatforming subs outside of MGTOW.	/r/MensRights	12/08/21 08:48 PM
2	The Feminists are coming, the feminist are coming! Sorry, this post has been removed by the moderators of r/MensRights. Moderators remove posts from feeds for a variety of reasons, including keeping communities safe, civil, and true to their purpose. So someone shares a post where posters on a sub originally meant to ban MGTOW indicate they want to brigade and report r/MensRights and all the mods can do is remove this post pointing it out? It's not r/MensRights that is calling for a brigade here.	/r/MensRights	12/08/21 08:45 PM
1	Are these Senators being sexist? Yes, and here are the senators that think women's lives count more than men Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) Senator James Lankford (R-OK) Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) Senator Roger F. Wicker (R-MS) Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) sources:https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/9/senate-republicans-introduce-resolution-block-sele/https://twitter.com/chiproytx/status/1419633537301504002	/r/MensRights	12/08/21 04:31 AM
1	The Feminists are coming, the feminist are coming! Also at least the republican party see's that votes can be had supporting men's issues. It's got a life of it's own now. Sure, just as long as those republicans aren't: Mike Lee (R-UT) James Lankford (R-OK) Steve Daines (R-MT) Roger F. Wicker (R-MS) Josh Hawley (R-MO) Marco Rubio (R-FL) James Inhofe (R-OK) Mike Rounds (R-SD) Tom Cotton (R-AR) https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/9/senate-republicans-introduce-resolution-block-sele/ https://twitter.com/chiproytx/status/141963353730150400…	/r/MensRights	12/08/21 04:21 AM