TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

operative87 Archive

View 3 posts and 584 comments by operative87 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I see a lot of good in this article. Her sentence while, being served in a psychiatric unit, is a 20 year sentence. The article also describes her actions as rape. To me that’s all a massive improvement on the normal scenario.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 11:07 AM
3

My ex was abusive to me and when I ended the relationship she accused me of abusing her. I was arrested and charged but ultimately found not guilty. I did spend some time remanded in prison though. Family court is a different beast though they refused to have a hearing on my allegations against her and only heard her allegations they sided with her and I lost my children. They had been in my custody previously but were put into foster care.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 03:14 PM
3

I would advise men to not share their experiences of abuse by women. Society punishes us when we do I learned the hard way.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:47 PM
7

I don’t have anyone I can call. Whether it’s good times or bad. I have people who call me when they need something, but that’s the only time anyone interacts with me.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 03:02 PM
3

Yes it is a movie. Cassie Jay was a feminist who set out to make a movie that would show the men’s rights movement in a bad light but the end product was far from that. It’s essentially a feminist discovering why feminism is bad.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 03:51 PM
1

Based on what?
/r/MensRights10/07/24 09:57 PM
1

To be fair, this time the man deserves more punishment than the woman. What she did is wrong but he was the one trusted with authority not her.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 01:12 PM
3

I’m not sure if you watched the video but the twitter posts there is not women indulging in a man’s kink. I know it’s hard for a lot of people to accept but there a many women out there who hate men and want to make them suffer. It’s insane to me that so many people will believe that misogyny exists while denying misandry does.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 12:09 PM
1

Don’t try to patronise me. The man vs bear argument is sexist bs and well you know it.
/r/MensRights27/06/24 03:08 PM
8

Take your whataboutism elsewhere.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 04:30 PM
57

This is why current statistics are worthless when it comes to domestic abuse. Women play the victim when they are the abuser and thanks to feminist creations such as the Duluth model women who abuse men are more often than not put down as victims.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 04:14 PM
17

It shows they are lying, if men truly are more dangerous than bears they would be going into the bear enclosure rather than staying near a number of men.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 10:51 AM
67

I saw a comment by someone on this sub that is the perfect response to someone who chooses the bear which I now use when this is brought up. Basically all you have to do to disprove the idea that women choose the bear is go to any zoo in the world. Go to the bear enclosure and take note there will be both men and women outside the enclosure. Why are none of the women jumping into the enclosure to escape from the men? Why have we never heard of that happening?
/r/MensRights22/05/24 07:45 AM
3

It’s another name for c-ptsd. An incredibly inappropriate name given that the most common cause is actually combat.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 06:44 AM
21

But she tried to… Your point isn’t really valid at all. Violence is wrong regardless of gender. Edit: making a comment the blocking me shows how immature you are and your point is still not valid.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 02:39 PM
22

Well right now you seem to be agreeing with comments that celebrate attempted murder.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 02:34 PM
25

It only gets that reaction when the victim is male. When a woman falls victim it’s always viewed as abhorrent. When a woman tries to kill a man however people support her. It’s disgusting.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 02:28 PM
28

So violence is perfectly fine so long as the victim survives?
/r/MensRights15/05/24 02:21 PM
15

The issue is that the system panders to one gender. Criminals try to avoid accountability of course but for men the system hits that out of them as it should, it should however do the same with women.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 10:08 PM
25

We have only her word for it, doesn’t make it true and as I said a man claiming his wife told him to do this would not result in her being arrested.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 05:18 PM
40

That’s the problem, an evil person will try to blame others but if they also happen to be a woman society joins in also blaming others. The husband shouldn’t be arrested for what she did and that would not happen in reverse.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:04 PM
4

M’y thoughts exactly given that uk government openly refer to male victims as victims of violence against women.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 07:59 PM
12

They don’t ask gender in the survey so chances are they will not care about male victims
/r/MensRights13/04/24 07:44 PM
3

The 12th of never
/r/MensRights06/04/24 07:14 PM
3

It’s clear that you didn’t read his post.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 02:20 PM
1

That doesn’t really make sense at all.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 10:52 AM
1

When you examine the actions of feminists it’s clear that feminism falls outside of its definition. In the same way that the Nazi party were socialists, but fell away from the socialisms definition.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 09:48 AM
3

I’ve personally been assaulted by women many times I know that it does happen. As to a source look at what you’ve written. You said only 9% of men will will be assaulted in some capacity then you pull the bs that it doesn’t count because it’s other men assaulting them. Your 9% bs is disproved by the majority of victims being men. You are wrong. The only here gaslighting is you. You do not know anything about me so do not fucking tell me what I want you nasty pos.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 12:04 PM
5

Actually most victims of violent crimes are male. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/women-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2021/women-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2021#:~:text=Violent%20crime%20was%20reported%20by,1.4%25)%20in%202020%2F21.&text=Violent%20crime%20was%20most%20prevalent,age%20group%20(Fig%203.02).
/r/MensRights01/04/24 12:50 PM
9

It does she has been proven wrong multiple times but her views remain the same.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 07:26 AM
20

I love the way Karen Straughn said this. It shows the point so well.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 08:36 PM
18

There’s hundreds of sites, the Duluth model has their own website where they talk about some of these things but their books are the place to look. When the Duluth model was created the internet didn’t exist. below is one that you can check for yourself. https://annsilvers.com/blogs/news/the-gender-biased-duluth-model-for-dv-treatment
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:40 PM
28

The Duluth model states that women are only ever violent in self defence therefore they cannot be abusers. It further states that only men can be abusers because they are ‘socialised in a patriarchal society that condones male violence’ You do not know what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:20 PM
30

You are very misinformed.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:17 PM
31

Except feminist completely ignore inequality when it’s men that are suffering it. In some cases they actively create those inequalities. For example feminists created the Duluth model which meant that men can’t be considered victims of domestic abuse, regardless of what a woman does to them. Many, many feminists are misandrists.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:09 PM
23

The sad part is that pension equality has led to protests from women who are demanding compensation for the fact that the retirement age was made gender neutral. The law was introduced in 1995 but they’re claiming that isn’t enough time to plan for a later retirement. To the privileged equality feels like oppression
/r/MensRights25/03/24 03:41 PM
0

The only one here who is pathetic is you. Narcissism stems from being inadequate you pretend to be so amazing and important because deep down you know how worthless you really are.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 06:14 PM
1

Keep doing your mental gymnastics, it changes nothing. The actions of feminists are what matters and at every stage they have proven they are not supporters of gender equality.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 09:03 AM
3

These are the type of things that the men’s rights movement should be about the difference in how we treated in any case of assault or abuse is shocking. In the country I’m from the definition of rape means that women forcing men is not even rape. It’s truly disgusting. Do you have the option of private prosecution? If so do that. In any case maybe organise a protest outside the police station even if you are protesting alone.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 10:10 AM
2

Some of them are funny but most aren’t. Too many base their entire act on their gender which just isn’t funny. Most of what they do is man bashing. The reason in my opinion is that they have a sense of entitlement. I note the hypocrisy that most women have. They don’t seem to understand that they are the ones acting like they are entitled to men not the other way around. The interaction tends to be along the lines of the woman wanting a man to do something for her then complaining and calling hi…
/r/MensRights17/02/24 09:51 AM
1

I have not voted you in any way. However you are still failing to grasp the changes in law. They are not to stop men taking foreign wives but to stop immigrants depending on the state.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 12:06 PM
1

That’s quite a reach. This is to prevent people coming here without the means to support themselves which is a good thing not a bad thing. We already support too many people.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 10:39 AM
2

How does it only target men? Gender is not mentioned at all. Please show which part targets men.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 02:56 PM
0

Yes I think op has this wrong completely wrong.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 01:09 PM
-1

I haven’t assumed anything. You are the pretentious one here. Spend a little bit of time in a gp surgery you will soon see that it’s not illegal immigrants clogging the system. If I’m wrong demonstrate it, show the part of these changes that is gendered as opposed to being about a persons means to support themself.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 12:09 PM
9

This law is not being changed to stop men marrying foreign women it’s being changed to reduce the numbers of immigrants entering the country without the means to support themselves. If you actually look at it the criteria for immigrants is nothing to do with gender and everything to do with their earning potential. Our public services are at breaking point, increasing the demand is not going to help that’s why this law is needed.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 11:49 AM
104

Something I notice about women is that most of them believe they know more about what men experience than men do. For example, if you post a question directed at men you’ll often have several women answering and even having the audacity to correct men on how men feel/think.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 09:38 PM
10

A very large extent of
/r/MensRights14/02/24 05:40 PM
3

Absolutely, I’m not saying the law is just. Far from it. It should be gender neutral but that was refused.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 05:56 PM
3

No it can be any orifice including the mouth. It’s defined in section 1 of the sexual offences act 2003. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/1
/r/MensRights12/02/24 05:27 PM
5

It’s not only against a female. The victim can be either gender. However a female cannot be considered a rapist as the legal definition requires penetration by a penis.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 04:59 PM
1

It’s really not the same for both genders at all. If you honestly believe it is then you must be blind.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 10:36 AM
1

You’re clearly not very experienced. Working in security I’ve seen peoples reactions to these things many times. People will often laugh at an injured party and the police will ignore offences often when they don’t feel like perusing them.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 08:58 AM
15

It’s not just one woman though is it? The system is setup in such a way that advantages women while disadvantaging men. Just look at the difference in domestic abuse services for an example. Thousand’s of women are abusing those advantages. The idea however that we are somehow saying all women are bad is just not true, there are plenty of women amongst our numbers on this sub.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 01:53 PM
18

That sentence is key. Working security I have been assaulted many times at work. We always get the police and of the literal hundreds of instances of me being assaulted by a woman only one woman faced charges. And why was she the one who did? Because she assaulted a police officer too. They don’t care about the average man but if you assault a police officer they’ll throw every charge they can at you. Though even then the sentence was a joke.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 03:34 PM
5

What FBI? There is no FBI in the UK.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:47 PM
11

Women are more violent but men inflict more harm when they are violent. Which is why it appears that men are more violent.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 09:18 AM
1

That’s not how you talk to a victim of sexual abuse. Get a life.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 08:11 AM
1

So what you’re saying is that women aren’t equal to men then? If men have to fight to protect women, don’t we deserve something in return?
/r/MensRights24/12/23 02:06 PM
1

Nonsense, this is an entire gender being forced to their deaths. For you that’s comedy you are a twisted individual.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 02:04 PM
1

But I see you didn’t answer my question, why is it only men who must protect the country? Why not women too?
/r/MensRights24/12/23 01:17 PM
1

Yeah it’s good for women that it’s not them and yes you are evil for what you support.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 01:16 PM
11

There was another recent case where a woman took a job as a kitchen porter for 4 days then sued the employer for making her finish work after 11pm. She claimed that was discrimination because she, as a woman, was scared walking home at that time. The judge ruled in her favour and she was awarded 16k. I spent 5 years working as a chef, kps always finish late because of the nature of the job. After customers finish there are dishes to wash. You leave once that’s done, I’ve never heard of a kp leav…
/r/MensRights24/12/23 10:41 AM
1

Why aren’t women protecting the country too then? Only men are being forced into it. They are being herded up like cattle and sent to slaughter. The fact that you support that shows that you are evil.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 09:11 AM
2

The uk family court system is plain evil. There’s no way a man can get a fair hearing. My ex was abusive to me but claimed I was the abusive one to stop me having custody of the kids. She wasn’t going for custody she wanted them in foster care. The judge refused to adjudicate on my allegations against her and only allowed her allegations to be heard in court. I had 144 pages of evidence that I wasn’t allowed to use including letters and social media messages. I had a video of her being abusive a…
/r/MensRights15/12/23 04:52 PM
8

The system needs to change though. Which is why subs like these matter. When a woman falls victim she gets support. When a man dies he gets vilified.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 02:29 PM
4

No one said that all women are scheming villains, but some are. My ex is a fantastic example. She is an abuser but goes to great lengths to look like a victim. The system is designed to support her in that which is not right.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 12:42 PM
9

Except very few of them deserve respect. Respect is a two way street. Most women have no respect for anyone and therefore do not deserve any in return.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 02:20 PM
5

So do security staff but no one is being arrested for that, the point being made here is the double standards. I can say for sure that if it was a group of women shouting misandrist abuse, nothing would be done.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 09:44 PM
71

It comes from a sad reality that most women have nothing else to offer. Men most definitely want more than that but we also have to accept that it’s unlikely we would be offered more.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 06:08 PM
70

She should be charged under section 1 of the protection from harassment act. Why are you defending her actions?
/r/MensRights21/11/23 01:54 PM
1

Yet so many complain about them….
/r/MensRights21/11/23 01:52 PM
1

Which is a total lie. I’ve already explained why.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 07:34 PM
2

I’ve never understood why they say the sentence is the same. It really isn’t. Being forced to penetrate would not usually lead to sexual assault charges. It would be a section 4 offence ‘causing sexual activity without consent’. The maximum sentence is the same as for rape. That however is irrelevant, hardly anyone receives the maximum for any offence. The minimum sentence is what really matters. The minimum sentence for rape is 4 years custody. The minimum sentence for sexual activity without c…
/r/MensRights20/11/23 09:55 AM
68

They’re complaining that men are leaving the country to find better women, they feel entitled to those men. They aren’t entitled to them.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 12:51 AM
106

No one is entitled to another person plain and simple. They tell incels that they’re not entitled to a woman, which is true, yet can’t see they’re doing the exact same thing.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 08:28 PM
1

Because they are egocentric. It really is that simple.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 09:52 AM
3

The reality is that op has a valid point. A lot of feminists argue that female athletes being paid less is sexist while not realising that female sports do not generate anywhere near as much revenue. Who is better is simply not relevant. The only thing that is relevant is revenue. I always say to those feminists, if you want to support female athletes; buy a ticket to see them. Arguing that they should be given money that simply isn’t there achieves nothing.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 02:13 PM
13

You’re the only one talking about menstruation. The protest is about male babies being cut.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 11:14 PM
2

That’s very true and in the uk the system is very much rigged in their favour
/r/MensRights09/11/23 11:08 PM
11

We do bleed when cut.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 11:07 PM
15

Would you care to explain how he lied or which facts are fake?
/r/MensRights09/11/23 09:28 PM
3

The uk government will refuse funding to this charity. They don’t give a shit about male victims. They’ll be too busy trying to make the abusive woman look like the victim.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 09:21 PM
1

When I called the police over domestic violence from my ex, they talked me out of pressing charges by saying the case would be unlikely to stick as the courts are unlikely to believe a woman would be violent to a man, especially a man in my profession (security). I later found out, through family courts, that the police had reported that I had made no allegation of violence that day. At work I see the police behave that way almost every time a woman behaves violently. It’s commonplace. Knowing t…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 04:56 PM
10

The problem is that she is 100% right. The legal definition of rape means it can only be committed by a biological man. The enemy here is not a single politician asking for the law to be adhered to, she is of no consequence. The problem is the law itself, that’s where change is needed.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 07:15 AM
19

I think a lot more than 50% of abusers would be women at first. They’re used to getting away with it and generally that type of abuse has been almost acceptable for decades.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 04:23 PM
1

She’s a woman attacking a man. The context is already here. We are saying that women don’t have a free pass for violence, surely that is clear.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 05:49 AM
1

When men are victims no one believes us. That alone renders your data impotent.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 09:38 PM
5

That’s a lie.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 09:18 AM
7

A lot of women are also abusers but we don’t say all women are.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 03:51 PM
9

She shouldn’t be hitting. The second she does she loses the right to any protection. You can’t attack someone and expect immunity.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 02:33 PM
12

Why the double standard though? Why is it ok for them to put their hands on us?
/r/MensRights17/09/23 08:02 AM
13

As a security professional I can tell you that what you’ve said is nonsense. A smaller weaker person can still injure the bigger stronger person I’ve seen it happen many times. To assume that a woman attacking a man won’t hurt him is just ignorant of reality. We are not punchbags, no one should be attacking but if someone attacks why should the victim risk injury by holding back?
/r/MensRights17/09/23 08:01 AM
1

It’s a sad situation and the police might not believe that she is abusive but whether you call or not is a decision for you.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 08:29 PM
2

I don’t unfortunately. There’s almost no resources at all for male victims so it may be that they simply tell you that there’s nothing available for him. If you see something it is best to call the police they might not do anything but at least it will be logged. Most abusive women resort to accusing their victim and it’s usually a successful tactic unfortunately. Your call might form the defence he needs to escape that and have a life after the abuse.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 08:10 PM
3

Not many. Call the men’s advice line or email them the keep a list and will advise you if there’s anything in your area. https://mensadviceline.org.uk/
/r/MensRights16/09/23 07:59 PM
57

To avoid those issues being dealt by with. There’s a lot of people who hate men and want us to suffer.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 05:22 PM
32

Ffs, get a new line.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 05:00 AM
1

That’s not always the best thing. Family courts shouldn’t have any bias though. No court should- bias courts are unjust.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 04:53 AM
3

It shouldn’t be that way.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 09:00 PM
3

It may be a well known fact, but it’s also incredibly rare for a father to be awarded custody. Even contact with the children is hard to get unless the mother supports it. That is also a well known fact.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 04:20 PM
2

Family courts have an automatic bias towards women. They believe that the mother is automatically the better parent. Cases such as this show that women are capable of harming their children. Family courts need to be confronted with that truth. For me, that’s why such cases are relevant to men’s rights.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 02:46 PM
1

😂 I thought so.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:56 PM
1

Did you post this on the wrong thread?
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:46 PM
1

Op is referring to female serial killers, shipman wasn’t female. I believe the most prolific female serial killer would be Mary cotton.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 10:45 AM
11

And the actress playing her is a known abuser to boot…..
/r/MensRights20/08/23 04:32 PM
1

For sure most female serial killers target children, if you consider all of them though very few are nurses. Which is the part that’s wrong.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 07:12 AM
4

I understand, I complained about them years ago too. My complaint was more than reasonable but I paid the price for it sadly. I’m not saying you shouldn’t complain I’m just saying be prepared you may need to fight them in the future.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:42 PM
2

I was thinking that too. Her and Myra Hindley. There’s lots of other examples though clearly the commenter isn’t well versed on the subject.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:32 PM
5

You’re lucky, be careful moving forward as well. They are insanely corrupt and they definitely hold grudges against those who complain about them.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:12 PM
41

At the basic level he’s right, he’s just chose a bad example. Women generally do get lenient sentences. Judges are actually instructed to do so. Lucy Letby however has gone beyond the point where gender would save her. When you murder babies for your own pleasure you’re getting that whole life sentence no matter who you are.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 04:09 PM
5

Have you tried making such a suggestion to feminists?
/r/MensRights09/08/23 03:13 AM
1

And yet enough feminists campaigned for that to enshrine it into law in a lot of places. The idea that not all feminists agree is irrelevant be cause such things are still happening
/r/MensRights08/08/23 03:05 PM
1

None I’ve seen are.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 02:57 PM
1

The stats are misinterpreted. There are more accidents involving young men but that’s simply because there’s more young men on the road. That said a lot of women have a ladies first mentality which often leads to problematic driving. I’m a very careful driver and have never been in an accident while driving. Only accident I’ve had, I wasn’t driving, I was parked in a bay and was hit by a woman. I’ve had lots of near misses from women who honestly shouldn’t be on the road though. There are women …
/r/MensRights07/08/23 07:39 AM
11

Most people here are very familiar with feminist ideology. For example the Duluth model which states that even if a women is violent towards her boyfriend he is clearly the abuser because women just don’t abuse men. That was written by feminists. Why are feminists so keen to twist such things? Why can’t they acknowledge that women can be abusers too? Ask those questions and you might start to understand what feminism really is.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 06:50 AM
6

What are you here then?
/r/MensRights06/08/23 10:55 AM
16

I work in security, mostly nightclubs, if a violent incident occurs female security are briefed to act as a witness but not get involved. If I did that I’d be unemployed. That said when we do have female security they deal with all the drunk women so as to protect us from false allegations so there is a balance. I took a few years away from security a while back and worked as a chef. One place I worked we had a woman in the kitchen, the owner of the restaurant was also a woman. The woman chef’s …
/r/MensRights05/08/23 07:27 AM
3

I’ve had the same experience. I think women tend to be more adept at gaslighting and do it way more often. I think what op means, although perhaps I’m wrong, is that feminists have weaponised the terms against men.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 04:47 PM
2

Your whole argument is made to defend the attacker. If you choose to attack someone you choose them as a victim. Equally I’ve been in security for a long time and can tell you that it doesn’t take much to injure someone. I’ve seen plenty of examples, you don’t have to be stronger than your opponent to hurt them. So why should the victim hold back and risk injury? As to the idea that the stronger person should restrain the other, that’s rarely viable because most people have no idea how to actual…
/r/MensRights31/07/23 08:47 AM
0

It’s not that male victims don’t matter but you must understand that not every one accused of sexual offences is guilty. Society has a tendency to forget that.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 12:38 AM
1

I agree with the presumption of innocence, but it happened in the uk. It’s nothing to do with the us.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 12:30 AM
1

Did you forget what you said? I thought you guys cared about men’s mental health and men sexual assault, why are you celebrating the man that has SA’d multiple men? What happened to the “men never get taken seriously when it comes to rape” ?? That was your comment…..
/r/MensRights27/07/23 10:06 PM
2

No one is celebrating him. The point that needs looking at is illustrated by what you’ve said here. He has not been convicted yet you are treat his guilt as a fact, what evidence do you have that the jury did not?
/r/MensRights27/07/23 08:44 PM
3

Our experiences with real women tell us that most of them very much are like that.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 07:29 AM
80

Those same women probably also say they don’t need a man……
/r/MensRights08/07/23 07:36 AM
10

I read the whole thing. The author is supporting feminism, not male victims. She’s essentially saying that male victims should behave how they are told so as not to offend feminists. That’s not support. She’s also spreading lies about how often women abuse men. Using terms like patriarchy and toxic masculinity is not supporting male victims either. Those are terms designed to put all the blame on men.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 01:15 PM
34

Taking them to school not really. But I had to register my son with our gp after being awarded custody. The receptionist kept asking where his mother is, despite me explaining that I’m a single father. My ex is an abuser. I honestly have no idea why I was so patient with her I’ve regretted it ever since. I didn’t even put in a complaint which I most definitely should’ve.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 08:35 PM
49

This is essentially women grouping together to stalk men en masse. That very much is worth discussing and it very much is a men’s rights issue.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 08:51 AM
23

So you’re saying we should disregard what we see and experience and believe what we are told to believe?
/r/MensRights22/06/23 11:49 AM
2

You aren’t right. You just believe you’re superior to others for some reason.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 02:00 PM
1

No one is forcing you to be on this sub. If you don’t want to be here then don’t. Why are you making such a big deal of it? You are not superior to anyone here, no one has to do as you say or match your methods.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 01:56 PM
1

I don’t think you’re understanding the situation fully. The family courts, for some inexplicable reason, behave as if no woman anywhere at anytime or in any place can possibly do anything wrong to children. Even a single case like this proves that position wrong. The reverse example you give is not the same because it expects all fathers to tarred with same brush because of the bad actions of a few. We aren’t expecting all mothers to be treated that way. All we ask is that the courts stop automa…
/r/MensRights13/06/23 01:25 PM
2

The fact that women do these things has to be highlighted in order to remove the gender bias that family courts have. Women aren’t the innocent, nurturing angels they’re treated as.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 12:48 PM
3

Because of child custody cases. In a nutshell women are murdering their children often yet still are automatically considered the better parent in family court because of gender.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 12:42 PM
2

Why do we have to be in a relationship at all? There’s nothing wrong with being single, and given that women generally treat us like shit there’s no reason at all for relationships.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 05:09 AM
1

Stfu you stupid little girl. People like you honestly make me sick. You can’t handle the truth of the world so jump to personal attacks on people who speak up. Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 07:26 PM
2

Yes feminists actually. Go ahead and look at what they actually campaign for…….
/r/MensRights06/06/23 07:16 PM
38

I think we are doomed to be alone. The reason I say that is that in many ways even in a relationship you are alone. Unfortunately society doesn’t care about us and women take advantage of that. I believe it’s too far gone to come back within the lifetime of anyone currently alive.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 05:18 PM
4

So calling me a dumb fuck wasn’t name calling!? Fuck off troll
/r/MensRights04/06/23 04:20 PM
8

I’m honestly done with your trolling. I’m not going to engage any further with you
/r/MensRights04/06/23 04:18 PM
5

You keep name calling but you offer no proof of anything you say. You are the ignorant one here. I’m sure you’re a child. Only a child would be as obsessed as you, make as many assumptions as you and have the level of self control you have.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 04:16 PM
7

Ok prove it, show me where mras say this
/r/MensRights04/06/23 04:14 PM
8

No you don’t find those views here at all. You’re making shit up again. No one has said that at all.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 04:12 PM
6

You’ll find these views across feminism. I didn’t say feminism wasn’t to blame. What I said was that society as a whole is to blame. You are twisting my words. Feminists have poisoned society there’s no doubt there. That said society is to blame for allowing that to happen and it’s society that has to change.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 04:09 PM
1

Maybe you need to get out of your own bubble
/r/MensRights04/06/23 02:56 PM
2

Stop making assumptions. You only embarrass yourself and show how little you know. I’m not American. Your entire profile is just you attacking this sub. You have quite literally set out to attack this sub. You ask questions then become abusive to anyone who answers. It’s easy to see what kind of person you are.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 02:55 PM
3

What are you even talking about, not a single one of the issues I mentioned are caused by the victims of said issues. You clearly hate anyone speaking up for men.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 02:48 PM
1

I understand it’s difficult. I have kids with my abuser too. I stayed for a lot longer than I should’ve for that very reason. When I did leave the court ordered that the kids be put in foster care. They simply won’t accept that it’s even possible for women to be abusers. He stands no chance there unfortunately.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 12:35 PM
29

I read about a case, in Spain if I remember correctly, where a judge ordered that the husband backpay minimum wage to his wife because she had cooked and cleaned. I was thinking he should also invoice her for rent, fuel, food, clothing etc It’s just a crazy double standard.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 12:15 PM
3

Equally your entire comment history is trolling this sub. You are a pathetic individual and clearly you have nothing better to do.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 11:32 AM
5

You asked a question then called someone names for answering it check your attitude.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 11:31 AM
3

Name calling is not ok. It’s clear that you have set up a profile just to troll this sub. Get a life.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 10:54 AM
14

100% I agree but unfortunately there aren’t many sensible people left. I honestly worry for the future.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 10:51 AM
117

It’s a power play on their part. They’re actually trying to enslave men. Think about this, if you are single you have to cook and clean for yourself and pay your own bills. What feminists now push for is men to pay the bills and cook and clean, so what is that if not servitude.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 10:47 AM
7

You really think that’s all we face? Have you seen what happens to mal victims of abuse? Have you noticed that the majority of homeless people are men? Have you seen the Ukraine, where women are free to flee war while men are forced to stay? Did you know that most of the world defined rape in such a way that if a woman puts a gun at a man’s head and forces him to have sex with her, it won’t be considered rape? Have you seen how many innocent men have spent the bulk of their lives in prison becau…
/r/MensRights04/06/23 10:25 AM
2

I went through this myself. My advice is don’t even try to prove it. I don’t know which country you’re in but the country I’m in (uk) courts won’t even consider his evidence. He needs to get out of there that’s all he can do.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 09:56 AM
51

Those are likely to be women who are abusers. They most likely play the victim to hide the truth. As a result supporting men in the way this woman is risks exposing them.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 02:19 PM
4

It’s good that you feel that way. You’re right these types of things stay with you for life.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 12:44 PM
7

I Hope he’s doing better now. False allegations are a serious issue especially as there’s not really a viable solution. I guess the best that can be done is raise awareness that these things happen in the hopes of removing the social stigma that the falsely accused face.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 12:39 PM
7

No need to worry, anyone who sees the injustice and wants change is of course welcome in these communities.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 12:22 PM
21

Exactly this. I’ve never understood the handful of guys on here who tell women they can’t be part of the men’s rights movement. It’s really stupid to shoot down someone who sees the injustice and wants to fight it. That said when those few guys pull that, the majority here let’s them know they’re wrong. Turning away allies to the cause is just absurd.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 07:21 AM
5

It’s a common tactic from them sadly. They say it’s us creating an echo chamber but it’s actually them doing so. Feminists don’t want equality that’s a lie they tell.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 07:04 PM
11

Yes and look at how we are labelled for it…. That’s the problem any where that men can turn for a safe space will be labelled as a hate movement which ostracised a lot of men who need support.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 04:55 PM
73

I experienced domestic abuse in a relationship that started when I was 16. I saw first hand how the system bends over backwards to ensure that the woman-good man-bad narrative is never broken.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 03:40 PM
3

I’m going against the grain here but I think you should involve the police. The guys safety is at risk. If he calls them they won’t believe him. They’re more likely to believe you as an uninvested witness. That said there’s still a chance they’ll take her side.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 08:25 PM
1

British people on average do behave worse than those from other countries. Take that from a guy who has done club security for 17 years in London. Equally keep in mind that most people in London clubs aren’t actually from the uk. You rarely encounter those who are. However, the women are just as bad as the men.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 04:04 PM
7

I think that’s a more accurate term. She created a fantasy of her being victimised repeatedly. A lie is little more simple than what she did.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 03:32 PM
13

I’m not high value but I see the same and avoid them too
/r/MensRights24/03/23 09:24 PM
1

I was a victim of abuse and have refused to enter a relationship since. I always find it it suspicious when women claim to have been in several abusive relationships. Most abusers claim to be victims and when they are women people blindly believe them. I think most of those repeated victims are actually abusers covering their tracks.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 02:04 PM
5

Their tweet where they talk about war journalists being killed. 11% of the deaths are women, they then say stop targeting women journalists. They don’t care about the 89%…..
/r/MensRights15/03/23 02:29 PM
46

When it was discussed in the USA feminists fought only to stop women being drafted, why didn’t they want it banned? Why were they happy for men to continue to be subject to draft?
/r/MensRights11/03/23 02:11 PM
1

Plenty of us have actual experience of women doing what you say is never an issue.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 02:10 PM
1

Did you actually watch the video? It was more like a disabled person being pressured into giving up their seat for a woman.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 02:05 PM
3

You’d be surprised. I’m from London and get told to smile often.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 12:56 PM
2

He said he doesn’t trust them, that’s not the same as hating them and is a normal reaction to trauma. He simply doesn’t want to experience the traumatic event again.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 10:08 PM
8

It’s not wrong look around you. You are ignorant. Why would you try to manipulate ops words?
/r/MensRights04/03/23 06:43 PM
13

You do not understand that as men we face that type of judgement every single day. When we have trauma we are not even allowed to express it. Yet you are claiming we are the ones with double standards. Plenty of women say exactly what op said and they receive support. Do you realise that in quite a lot of countries if a woman forces a man to have sex it’s not considered rape? You have no idea what double standards are. You aren’t helping anyone to understand anything. You are simply ignorant.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 06:39 PM
8

That’s not quite the same as Op is saying. He is saying he is unable to trust women due to a traumatic event. Stop twisting words you pathetic little troll.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 06:33 PM
6

And you are still wrong…..
/r/MensRights04/03/23 06:30 PM
13

Women say that kind of thing all the time and they get support, not destroyed.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 06:27 PM
6

They’re never accurate. If someone is willing to make a false allegation they’re willing to lie to a researcher too. These statistics are gathered simply by accuser if the allegation is false or true.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 11:34 AM
5

Those statistics are not accurate. It’s impossible to accurately gather such information.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 10:44 AM
1

The Uk needs a lot of change for sure. Although it’s not all bad the UK seems to be the only country where those who are proven to have made false rape allegations face prosecution. That’s good at least.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 02:16 PM
14

In the uk the law doesn’t define that as rape, that’s the subject of the article. Morally you are absolutely right but actually no it’s assault not rape.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 02:29 PM
14

I wish it were that simple. In the uk it isn’t.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 02:28 PM
0

It’s not actually discrimination though. He’s upholding the same rules with everyone in order to keep them safe. A bar/club isn’t the best place for you to go to socialise to be honest. You’d be much better off finding a hobby and then using that to socialise, find a group for practicing that hobby.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 12:48 PM
1

A doorman is unlikely to have time to truly explain the policy to you, nor does he have to. That said the policy was originally introduced to reduce thefts as most pickpockets were operating alone. Of course they adapted and started coming in pairs rendering that bit pointless. However the policy does help with safety. You’ve partly explained it yourself but essentially a lone person is vulnerable. As a doorman if you’re dealing with someone who has got so drunk that they’ll struggle to get home…
/r/MensRights25/02/23 12:32 PM
1

Try reviewing Cctv footage relating to allegations you’ll see that the stats don’t ring true then…. Myself I’ve had roughly 40 such allegations to deal with in the last year only one was genuine
/r/MensRights24/02/23 08:46 PM
10

To be honest I doubt such a post would achieve very much, this would need a lot more than just me to make any difference.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 04:36 PM
15

Usually very far. For example one woman slapped a guy then ran to security claiming he had groped her backside. The footage showed that he hadn’t been anywhere near her, she had walked around 30ft to reach him. Slapped him in the face and went directly to security. I tracked his movements from the moment he had entered the site he had been no where near this woman. There’s been other occasions where there hasn’t even been anyone matching the description of the suspect and no one has approached t…
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:45 PM
5

Indeed it does. I saw one on the other side. I very strongly feel that more has to be done for male victims of domestic abuse but I saw an article which for the most I agreed with. Then one sentence killed it for me. Then said x% of males never tell anyone of their experiences( I can’t remember the number). You can’t possibly know how many victims never speak of it. Those type of statements take away all credibility.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:36 PM
20

I don’t think it’s possible to give exact numbers because a lot of cases won’t have evidence either way. That said I work in the security industry and since November 2021 I’ve been in the control room. Part of my job is to be a cctv operator. Ive handled footage reviews for more than 40 sexual assault allegations. The site I work on is heavily covered by cameras, there’s almost 800 cameras here so nothing happens without being picked up. Of those allegations only one has been genuine. Ive had si…
/r/MensRights23/02/23 03:20 PM
1

Are you really that stupid….. If they’re unreported how did the study know about them!?
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:19 PM
1

These are not facts. These studies consist of simply asking the participants. If you think these studies form facts then that’s a good reason not to take anything you say seriously.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 10:17 PM
2

What standard of proof are they using then. I can’t help but wonder how allegations that can’t be proven in court somehow can be proven in these studies. Either they are making assumptions or they are perverting the course of justice by hiding evidence there’s no in between here.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 04:20 PM
4

https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/BFI_WP_2019120.pdf
/r/MensRights19/02/23 05:17 PM
8

This post is about the fact that women can literally run us over in a car trying to kill us and not be punished. Yes I am angry that they have that right.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 09:02 PM
1

I was a victim of domestic abuse and say for sure that there’s many women who think that. Sadly a lot of those women are in positions to do serious harm, social workers, police officers, judges, lawyers etc.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 07:35 AM
1

What he did was challenge her views, which on this subject is required. Male victims of domestic abuse are ignored at best, more often than not they find themselves labelled abuser. Why? Because society doesn’t accept that women abuse men. So actually the conversation he had is one that needs to be had. The chances are the woman became upset because she is an abuser and those conversations will ultimately lead to change in the system that allows her to abuse freely.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 07:33 AM
0

So you think that only men are abusive?
/r/MensRights22/01/23 07:27 AM
3

*write Learn English before pretending to be superior.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 08:27 AM
5

I restrain people as part of my job and can tell you that it’s not as simple as you think it is. You clearly have no clue on the reality. Not every man is capable of restraining a woman.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 06:06 AM
10

No but I’ve seen people cheering women on when using weapons before. It’s not out of the ordinary.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 05:58 PM
11

I work security I see a lot of violence. Most people find it funny or cheer it on when women assault men. It’s a reality of life that needs attention.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 05:56 PM
12

The reaction is though. People find it funny when a woman does this to a man but deplorable the opposite way. Either should be deplorable. Even the police rarely take it seriously. I’ve experienced it myself many times. There’s plenty of examples look at the Dana white thing right now. His wife slapped him he slapped back. He is being condemned yet no one has condemned her slapping him.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 05:51 PM
14

I wouldn’t call smashing someone with a bowling ball one punch, that guy’s life was endangered by what she did.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 05:38 PM
17

This reminds me of an incident at my work. I work security in clubs and was accused by two women of being too aggressive after my colleague refused entry to two women. I wasn’t aware that was happening and came outside for some air, it was hot inside. They immediately said I was being two aggressive. Had to ask my colleague what was going on. They jump to calling any man aggressive for no reason.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 09:08 AM
7

We can form our own views. Gender studies is fully based on feminism it’s not equal, it’s one sided. What you’re doing here is typical of feminists. The you believe what we tell you to believe mentality.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 07:49 AM
5

I’ve literally heard people saying that so you are wrong.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 02:36 PM
251

They want us to stay quiet and this is one way of achieving that.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 10:05 AM
21

I’ve never actually watched his videos but a lot of people take advantage like that. David Icke for example, the guy comes across as insane but he’s far from it. He says all that crazy stuff to sell books, merchandise, and make appearance fees. He was interviewed a while back by a journalist and she directly asked him about that he just smiled and walked away. It was obvious.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 10:25 PM
12

Perhaps but then again there’s no evidence of that. She destroyed the hard drive that he allegedly had the images on. She premeditated murder, all we have to him about the images is her word. She very easily could have lied.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 03:44 PM
-1

I understand. That said his account is deleted so I’m thinking he was feminist troll trying to get people on this sun to support child abuse so they could use it against us. I could be wrong it’s just the impression I got.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 03:07 PM
1

Honestly my phone is going crazy. For the last week autocorrect has been bullying me….. I’m not sure if I should laugh or cry.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 03:00 PM
1

A feminist social worker yeah- you very much are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 02:16 PM
1

The vast majority will do as I described above. I’ve experienced it that is not an assumption. If think it is then you don’t know what assumption means. One need only look at the action of feminist groups to understand. Every time a men’s shelter open feminists campaign to redirect any funding it gets to women’s shelters. Look at what they did to Erin Pizzey, simply because she admitted women are abusers too. You won’t convince me of anything here because I know what feminist do.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 02:09 PM
1

My experience is the opposite. When a man talks about a woman having abused him in any way feminists go on the attack. I was a victim of domestic abuse myself and have first hand experience of how feminists treat that subject.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 02:02 PM
26

I’ve been there too. I went through an abusive relationship and in family courts no one believed me they labelled me as abuser instead it’s only recently that I had a police officer believe me. She was trying to get back in touch and I reported her for harassment, turns out I wasn’t the last victim and she’s been convicted with others hence the police finally believing me. That said at the time I was suffering a lot. I spoke to my gp but nothing happened. I ended up in hospital after a suicide a…
/r/MensRights22/12/22 01:25 PM
2

Child abuse should come with punishment. I believe that op was a troll looking to discredit this sub. I believe that because upon seeing that the users here don’t support child abuse the account has been deleted. That said. Child abuse must be called out. The post was made in such a way that op was claiming to be innocent he’s fat from that,
/r/MensRights22/12/22 12:55 PM
3

There’s nothing wrong with my comments at all. What’s wrong is that you find threatening to kill a toddler acceptable. I mean take a look at the others who have replied to you, dies the fact that everyone disagrees with you not make you consider you might be the one who is wrong?
/r/MensRights22/12/22 12:38 PM
2

Mate you’re justifying child abuse but you think there’s something wrong with me?
/r/MensRights22/12/22 12:03 PM
-1

Agreed to an extent but it certainly came across as them both being abusers.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 12:02 PM
3

No, you should’ve read more he details her also being abusive to the child. They’re both abusing the kid.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 10:04 AM
1

Having to put up with women is fat worse than putting up with periods.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 09:10 AM
22

Actually he pointed out that an expert in the article states that the majority of women’s suicide attempts are not real attempts…..
/r/MensRights22/12/22 09:08 AM
88

The thing is that recently this idea of men staying silent and not seeking help was debunked and feminists still will push their views. The university of Manchester conducted research which found that 91% of men who commit suicide HAVE tried to get help. There is however a difficulty in actually getting that help. They also found that compared to women men are less likely to complete a course of therapy. They don’t comment on the reason for this but my personal experience is that therapists tend…
/r/MensRights22/12/22 09:06 AM
1

Plus they exist to refer you to local services. There aren’t any such services in most areas. I called the helpline a few years back and they told me there’s nothing in London they can refer victims to.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 08:27 AM
3

You do understand that you’re justifying child abuse right? It’s natural that people will find that to be abhorrent.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 08:17 AM
2

I’ve never threatened to kill my children. That’s extreme. The fact that you’re trying to justify that tells me that you shouldn’t be around children. They are not safe with you.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 08:05 AM
27

Your wife sounds awful, but honestly why would you threaten to kill a toddler!? Sorry but the only sympathy I have here is for your son.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 01:19 AM
100

If her past was actually unimportant she wouldn’t lie about it. The fact that she lied proves she’s untrustworthy. Now she’s complaining he doesn’t trust her. No self awareness at all.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 12:32 AM
1

Sexual assault is a dangerous area women commit way more than is acknowledged and there’s a lot of false allegations too. Feminists do embellish those stats. A good example is when they say only 3% of rape allegations are false. It’s likely to be higher but it’s impossible to truly put a number on it. Anyone who tries loses credibility immediately, they’re either lying or don’t understand the subject matter. That said look how feminists react when male victims speak up.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 09:33 PM
1

It’s rare to find a feminist who doesn’t hate men or is willing to even admit that men have issues, unless it benefits women in some way. I remember reading an article in a newspaper a couple of years ago. It was written by a feminist but was far from the usual, up until then she wrote in that paper every week. I wish I could remember her name but I can’t. The subject of her article was how men generally don’t have anywhere to turn to when things go wrong. She pointed out that feminism has creat…
/r/MensRights21/12/22 07:02 PM
63

A step in the right direction if you ask me. Next move should be to get government funding for some actual help.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 03:35 PM
4

Certain issues crossover in such a way that it can’t be helped. Personally my biggest issue is domestic abuse. Abusers generally claim to be victims to avoid be exposed as abusers. We currently live in a society where believing the woman is the norm. To address that we have to address that male victims of female abusers are often treated as abuser and vice-versa. Doing so will be claimed as downplaying women being abused. There’s no choice there.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 12:49 PM
15

Yes but a feminist won’t see it that way.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 09:05 AM
61

No but you won’t convince a feminist to look at men’s issues. Those people have a very one sided view and the truth is they do not want equality they are female supremacists.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 09:02 AM
4

Yes they did. Plus the women would just touch as they please and not care about him telling her no. I get it often as well, I’m not gay but I don’t like being touched. Telling a woman not to touch you seems to just encourage them to touch more.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 06:39 AM
12

I know exactly what you mean. Unfortunately it’s way society is right now. We absolutely should fight it but it’s a losing battle either way.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 07:01 PM
19

Oh I know a woman’s word are very dangerous.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 05:59 PM
23

They do and also with that they often falsely accuse their victim. Last time I went for a night out, which I don’t do often, I had one woman quite drunk started twerking on me out of nowhere. I immediately put my hands in the air and stepped back. Security saw what was going on and removed her from the club. Now the reason that went well for me is that the security there work for the same company I do they know me. My reaction was experience based, stepping back with my hands in the air very muc…
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 05:40 PM
26

I haven’t seen the statistics he refers to about single fathers but if that’s reliable research then we need to get it out there
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 05:21 PM
51

Do you know why gay bars don’t like letting women in? I’ll tell you, vast amounts of sexual assaults. I used to work in one of the bars she’s likely referring to. Edit- to remove any ambiguity. Drunk women get hands and believe that all men want their touch. The men in that bar are gay they do not want it.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 04:50 PM
5

Trying to debate with a feminist is like trying to play chess with a pigeon. How you play makes no difference the pigeon will Knock over the pieces shit on the board and strut around triumphantly.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 01:52 PM
15

Feminists have a lot of political and social influence so of course there will be resistance but this stuff has to be done.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 11:27 AM
1

It does happen in other countries. Certainly in the uk at least.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 05:56 AM
3

That sound great. It’s a cause I feel very strongly about. I really hope you succeed in your endeavour. More needs to be done for male victims at the moment the best we can hope for is to be ignored and that’s just not how it should be.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 11:07 PM
4

You have repeated it several times here
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:55 PM
1

Take your brainwashing elsewhere men are not controlling the world. We suffer plenty so fuck you you psychopath
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:54 PM
1

I’ve been abused and I’ve seen what you evil people do so fuck you
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:53 PM
7

I’m willing to bet most of those women are abusers. You reap what you sow.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:51 PM
7

You are misguided you’re literally telling victims they don’t matter because they’re the wrong gender. You deserve the oxygen you breathe
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:49 PM
6

I’m labelling you as hitler not women. You don’t speak for every one.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:48 PM
11

It’s been done and shut down because evil feminists like you campaign to ensure there’s no funding. I know the truth you people are abusers and you don’t want your victims to have any help.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:43 PM
10

Yet you’re offended by men speaking up about what happens to us, hypocrite.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:41 PM
7

It’s only the discussion in your mind. You want to talk about female victims then make your own post. Feminists do worse than brush us aside they do everything in their power to ensure that we get labelled abuser rather than victim. You’re every bit as bad as hitler!
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:39 PM
12

How can you be both a womaniser and an incel? That’s a major contradiction
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 11:37 AM
30

For me personally I would have no interest in a woman who isn’t paying her own way. I got into a relationship when I was 15 she couldn’t wait to get pregnant and tampered with condoms to do it. She was very abusive. I came out of that relationship knowing that it’s not how life should be. I saw family courts and the way the act. They don’t see men as human that was clear to me. Most women have a very one sided view of relationships. It’s why men don’t share their feelings with women, we do talk …
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 10:02 PM
1

Long enough. You have your views I have mine. The reality is that as soon as you said you’re a feminist I don’t consider you a rational human being. It’s like asking an auschwitz survivor to debate with a concentration camp guard. Feminists are evil each and everyone.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 12:36 PM
3

I was but I would never associate with those people again.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 12:33 PM
3

Doubtful very doubtful. When confronted they’ll pay the issue lip service but they have their agenda and they will push it as much as possible.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 12:21 PM
2

Except if you spend enough time around them you’ll see most are as I described, the ones you describe are the minority. The same rings true when talking about domestic violence. They actively cover up the truth of how many men are abused by women.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 12:14 PM
3

There’s feminist on here who literally advise women to claim rape to avoid being caught cheating….. Worse still was on who recently advised a woman to claim rape to avoid being caught out when her child wasn’t her husbands and instead was the product of an incestuous one night stand with her brother. The feminist in question said it’s better the woman says it rape than her be charged fir incest.
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 12:08 PM
11

For you perhaps but no. Some of us have better things to do.
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/22 10:30 PM
21

I’ve never heard of anyone being banned from men’s rights. The mods there hate banning people because it’s more feminist behaviour, the old you don’t agree with me so you must be silenced. To get banned from there you must’ve gone pretty far. Then again it des seem you just come here to argue.
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/22 10:14 PM
25

Exactly this, I always point out that putting a number on false allegations is impossible and anyone who tries has zero credibility because they’re making up numbers to use as evidence of their narrative. Feminists go nuts when you say that. They hate that you can think independently of their nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 10:45 AM
11

You really need to talk to the police. Those texts are evidence so don’t delete them but also don’t talk to him any further.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 06:28 PM
10

I always thought that women were cleaner at home but dirtier in public places. I attributed it to them looking at their home as somewhere they clean and the public place as somewhere someone else cleans.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 01:44 PM
40

I nightclub security and can tell you that at the end of the night the female toilets always end up looking like a battle has unfolded in them. The male toilets aren’t never that bad, although they aren’t exactly clean either. Based on that I’m going to have to say yes men are cleaner.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 01:22 PM
17

The trouble with creating a law that would allow for abortion only in cases of rape is that it would lead to an epidemic of false rape allegations. There’s already already way too many false allegations no need to incentivise them.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 06:45 PM
78

‘Becoming’? Totally wrong we already are and have been for decades.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 07:10 AM
3

I agree. I didn’t know it was an autism thing but I’m not wholly surprised by that. Trouble is that if you try to explain that to a feminist they won’t care.
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/22 05:49 PM
10

I can’t help but notice an increase in feminist trolls posting here recently I wouldn’t be surprised if you’re right.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 05:25 PM
7

People don’t react at all and the reality is that sadly rings true even when women do cause harm. That said violence should always be unacceptable but that’s just not how the world is.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 03:00 PM
10

The trouble is the double standard in my opinion at least. When a woman is violent towards a man no one cares. The fact that men are capable of causing harm shouldn’t make it ok to be violent towards us which is where we are right now.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:50 PM
1

I’ve refuted every claim you’ve made actually. You haven’t proven anything here and are butthurt I won’t stick to your script. Your account has solely been comment on reply’s to this post. Maybe you should find a better way to entertain yourself I won’t be engaging any further with you
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:36 PM
1

But that’s not the case though it’s a false assumption on your part. Couples often join their finances because they consider themselves to be a household it’s nothing to do with sex. Women usually take advantage of that. If we’re so obsessed with sex how come you’re the one making the leap to it being the motivation for financially merging a household?
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:34 PM
1

You’ve setup an account just to check me here here and troll. You don’t understand the subject matter but are commenting on a post that hasn’t been active for nearly two weeks but I’m wasting your time? I didn’t approach you opposite way round if you feel it’s a waste of your time then why are you still commenting?
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:31 PM
1

It’s 100% relevant. Women treat their partners money as if it’s theirs. I don’t think you’re grasping the reality of this at all. If you’re saying that a wife using her husbands money is him spending it on sex wouldn’t that make all of these women prostitutes?
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:26 PM
1

It has plenty, most of those judges are feminists and it’s men getting screwed over. Women are choosing to essentially use the courts to legally rob men.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:22 PM
10

For a while a chief constable in Yorkshire wanted a man engaging in unsolicited conversation with a woman be considered a hate crime. So if a man was in a town he had never been to before and got lost then approached a woman’s asked for directions to the nearest train station he would be arrested. Thankfully that never went through though.
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/22 02:21 PM
1

And who usually contributes more? Feminists claim that women earn less but also make up the vast majority of consumer spending…… There’s only one way that can be true…..
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:18 PM
1

Family courts on paper are rarely the same as in reality though. Especially where I’m from (the uk) it’s pretty much a free for all here although it will soon. At the moment they’re held in complete secrecy but they’re about to be partially opened which will change how judges act. They will have to actually follow guidelines.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:16 PM
1

Most of the time women choose lower earning careers so men have to pay out. It’s generally not considered that the man contributed more during the marriage either she still gets half.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:14 PM
1

You should look at actual divorce rulings I think you’d be shocked
/r/MensRights10/12/22 01:58 PM
1

It’s still him being forced to pay her though isn’t it? Why is that fair?
/r/MensRights10/12/22 01:52 PM
1

In that scenario she clearly quit her job to stay at home. I know people like you struggle to understand a lot of concepts but this is a simple one. Equally speaking spousal support is not only awarded to unemployed wives I’m not sure why you’re claiming that.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 01:45 PM
1

No I wouldn’t and you clearly don’t understand at all. So if chooses to be stay at home it’s likely she won’t be working at the time of divorce right?
/r/MensRights10/12/22 01:36 PM
1

Do you actually know how divorce works? It doesn’t seem like you do. He can leave but it’ll be court ordered that he still support her he won’t have a choice in it at all. There’s still men who want stay at home wives but that’s not a majority. Most of us have woke up to the reality that we are just being used as a source of income.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 01:20 PM
1

Ok I think you’re saying that a man can choose simply to not be with such a woman is that correct? The way you’ve written it isn’t clear. If that is what you’re saying then you aren’t entirely correct. What happens if you marry a working woman who then changed her mind and decides she wants to be a stay at home wife, what choice do you as a man have? Also as long as we are being told that a real man is a provider there most definitely is a social pressure on us.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 11:20 AM
22

That law will be massively abused. They’re putting ‘persistent staring’ as a category of harassment. If the history of uk law is anything to go by the definition of persistant staring will be left vague enough that they’ll convict you just for a passing glance.
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/22 10:43 AM
14

It relates to domestic violence which is an area of mens rights that needs attention. At the moment male victims generally go unheard because no one believes that women abuse men. Cases like this prove otherwise.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 06:04 AM
8

She got 35 months.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 06:02 AM
1

I work night club security I probably see a hell of a lot more violence than you. It most definitely is true. For your two times of it not happening I’ve seen thousands of it happening.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 10:45 PM
1

I’m not fussed about justice, what gets to me is the lack of support. I mean I finally did get kind of get acknowledged as a victim. Just by one police officer because he saw my exs record and she’s been convicted of doing it to others. To me I think that automatically believing anyone is a bad idea. No judgement should be made until evidence is there. That doesn’t mean disregarding victims it just means remaining open minded.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 04:52 PM
1

The trouble is that gender doesn’t prove anything. I myself was abused by a girlfriend for 7 years. I went through the system at a time when it was believed that women can’t abuse men so if there’s any allegations on either side the man is guilty. I’ve seen the damage it does.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:55 PM
1

There won’t be. That said I can tell you that what I’m saying isn’t just plucked out of thin air. I’ve been a doorman since 2005. I’ve worked in literally hundreds of venues and have been head of security for several too. I know what these policies are, how they are enforced and why because I’m one of the people who implement and enforce them. Edit: the reason the stats don’t exist is that it’s impossible to collect data on it. Even crime reports won’t help because most of what happens goes unre…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:53 PM
1

Wrong again. Large groups of women cause the same problems as large groups of men. There really is no difference. These policies are implemented based on experiences not statistics. Those experiences however are old world ones as these policies have been implemented for too long for current staff to have them.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:46 PM
1

Unfortunately the whole believe women movement does still have a grip.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:41 PM
1

You’re wrong. None of that is the reasoning behind those policies. Groups of men are refused entry because it’s believed they will cause trouble. Often lone men will also be refused for the same reason. Although recently a lot of venues are actually making the no single entry policy gender neutral, their reasoning is that a lone woman would be vulnerable.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:40 PM
3

You’re not wrong. A Hugh number of cases won’t have definitive proof either way and so can’t be prosecuted. But there are also a lot of cases where t there is definitive proof but still aren’t prosecuted. That said it used to be that no cases was prosecuted at all so we are moving forward.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:37 PM
1

Pubs/bars/clubs in the uk still do openly discriminate against men with quite a lot of their door policies though. For example: large groups of women- fine large group of men- no entry. Woman wearing trainers or shorts-fine man wearing trainers/shorts-fine.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:26 PM
3

It’s rarely used but when proven to be lied they can be charged either perjury or perverting the course of justice. There have been cases of it happening. The issue is that it doesn’t happen enough.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:22 PM
2

I think there would be. The trouble with social media is that people don’t seem to understand that they’re talking to a human being. People say things they would never say face to face and then those things slowly become acceptable to them.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:15 PM
12

Depends what you’re angry about. I came to this sub because I experienced domestic abuse and I know that’s an area where men are not treated justly and it needs work. That’s a subject that does make angry. It’s normal to be angry about injustice.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 10:59 AM
17

There’s very few of them but those people seek them out to discredit us, to be honest I wouldn’t even be surprised if some of those posts are made by feminists in order to give themselves ammo against us
/r/MensRights05/12/22 10:37 AM
38

If they admit that they’ll have to actually look at male issues for once. Saying we hate women is a way to discredit us.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 07:47 AM
7

Yes they don’t want to be called out for their own bad behaviour. I work nightclub security and honestly you don’t want to know the kind of stuff I see.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 09:38 PM
13

I know that all to well. They try their to cover it up.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 08:25 PM
65

The trouble is that they do that with any kind of abuse. It ends up making us be quiet about our experiences which is their ultimate goal. This is exactly why I am anti feminist.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 08:15 PM
1

I wonder when men will be able to leave abusive women without being punished. The word ‘always’ is not in my comment. That word changes the context of what I actually said.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 07:17 PM
1

You’ve misquoted to fit your own means. Abuse very much does happen both ways, but again if we talk about male victims you’ll just. You made it clear earlier that you think it’s funny. Stop basing your views on history and look at the modern world.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 06:22 PM
1

Abuse happens in both directions. But we’ve already established that you think it’s funny when men are abused.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 06:17 PM
1

You literally just said she wouldn’t be able to say those things without feminism. So yes you said feminism gave her free speech. Women worked before feminism too so wrong again. Your movement is based on lies, brainwashing and delusion. If I went to a feminist sub and acted how you do on this sub, I’d get banned. You have t been banned here, what does that tell you?
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 06:13 PM
1

Yes she would actually. Feminism did not create freedom of speech. It did create cancel culture though which is pretty anti freedom of speech…..
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 06:06 PM
2

Wait are you implying she shouldn’t be anti-feminist because she owes you people something for her lifestyle? She saw feminism for what it truly is, like everyone else on this sub. Feminists do nothing for male issues and happily create more issues for us. My personal reason to be anti feminist is my experiences of domestic abuse. I’ve seen how feminists treat male victims it’s disgusting.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 06:04 PM
1

What claims did she make that are?
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 05:54 PM
1

She isn’t making baseless claims. Maybe you should read it instead of making assumptions. You’re looking a bit stupid right now.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 05:48 PM
2

No if you actually read what she said you’d know she is not a feminist she’s anti feminist and she’s responding to a random person online who told her what “real feminism” is. She pointed out what real feminists do.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 05:45 PM
2

Honestly I’ve explained that to way too many people to waste my time on actually typing it. Here’s the closest I’m going to do. Take a look at what Karen Straughn said about the argument that real feminists want Eqaulity. They don’t, if they did they would be trying to help male issues too, but they actively try to silence male issues.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 05:41 PM
2

Feminists makes that claim but their actions proven otherwise.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 05:29 PM
1

Also wanting rights does not equate to hatred. You on the other hand come here to insult everyone, that’s hatred.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 05:26 PM
1

No….. I’ve never met my dad. I haven’t claimed anything about him.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 05:25 PM
1

It was earlier today although I also remember you from a thread a few days ago. And yes I do not owe you any answer. I already gave you an answer to one of your questions which is a lot more than I should’ve done.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 05:22 PM
1

On another thread I asked several questions you didn’t answer a single one.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 05:13 PM
2

You don’t answer questions so why should I answer to you.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 05:11 PM
2

Surely you understand that very few men have received any support from women? You can’t seriously not see that. Normally if you open up it will lead to an attack. For example if you tell your girlfriend that you’re insecure about something you can garuntee that as soon as she isn’t getting what she wants she’ll use that insecurity to attack you. The lesson we learn from that is to not open up. Also when I commented stop attacking us when we open up it was a reply to someone else. That said you d…
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 05:07 PM
3

And I promise you, they’re the majority
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 04:07 PM
4

Then you’re in a minority. Unfortunately most women will use anything we feel against us. That’s what we’ve experienced.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 04:02 PM
3

Then stop attacking us when we do.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 03:59 PM
6

I’ll answer, although you never answer questions put to you when you come trolling here. It looks like an equal partnership. Both contribute something and both care for each other. That’s light years away from current standards where men are expected to make all the effort. Most women can’t even acknowledge that we have feelings. Equally controlling behaviour isn’t ok just because you’re a woman.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 02:18 PM
1

You’re a misandrist troll, grow up and get a life.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 12:33 PM
1

And you find that acceptable? You’re telling me that I shouldn’t be offended by people joking about domestic against men because someone else has about women? It’s not funny and you’ll find I’m not advocating it for either gender, you’re the one here supporting it.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 12:27 PM
2

I’m been a victim so yes I do find it offensive. I don’t see why 50 year old adverts should make me less offended. Edit: your link also said those adverts would not be accepted today. So why is one ok but not the other?
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 12:11 PM
2

It’s not an appropriate subject to joke about. You would see that if the genders were reversed. Would you laugh if they were? Would you defend it then?
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 12:02 PM
2

No you did, it’s abuse to cause your partner to live in fear of you. Sorry your misandry doesn’t allow you to see that. Would you laugh if a company posted something saying men should cause their girlfriends to live in fear?
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 11:54 AM
2

Yes women being abusive is just a joke. You must be a horrible person.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 08:43 AM
4

That would help society. There are lots of men out there who need anti feminists to help stop them getting destroyed by evil women.
/r/AntiFeminists04/12/22 08:42 AM
4

Reminds me of a case I read about, although can’t remember all the details. It happened in Scotland. A woman was caught engaging in sexual acts with a dog. She was convicted and received probation. Her husband was convicted of being an accessory to her crimes because he had filmed her, he went to prison…..
/r/MensRights03/12/22 01:52 PM
2

To be fair, most of the time we aim to grapple rather than hit but you don’t always have a choice. Trouble is we can’t run or walk away.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 10:14 AM
1

I’m the USA perhaps, but not everywhere
/r/MensRights01/12/22 10:13 AM
26

Not always, I’m a nightclub doorman. Restraining people is a big part of my job, I’m very capable of it but over my career I’ve been bitten twice both times by women. If you honestly think it’s easy, you’re mistaken. Women can be very dangerous especially when they go for weapons, which they often do. Also especially when you hold back like you’re supposed to.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 11:20 PM
27

The trouble with that view is that it turns us into punchbags.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 11:16 PM
12

100% with you on that!
/r/MensRights30/11/22 10:30 PM
6

I’ve got some martial arts practice under my belt too. Thing is you’d be surprised though. I’ve fought both bigger and smaller people and the truth is that the size doesn’t make anywhere near as much difference as people believe it does.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 09:26 PM
31

My view is that she shouldn’t hit in the first place then.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 09:24 PM
26

Size means nowhere near as much towards a fight as people think. I work in a professional where I deal with a lot of violence and you can’t predict someone’s capabilities based on size. That said I’m not someone who would start a fight with anyone. Though you’d be surprised how many people would do just that thinking that the rules of society will protect them. As to the social one, if you’re being ostracised there’s not a lot you can do.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 07:12 PM
46

I’m saying you shouldn’t be hitting anyone at all. I’m perceived as stronger than most people, I probably am physically but that shouldn’t make it more ok to hit me.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 06:42 PM
119

It would be nice to make it gender neutral but I don’t think their strength/weakness should come into it. It should just be don’t hit anyone that hasn’t hit you first.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 06:31 PM
3

How would you conduct the interview?
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/22 03:20 PM
7

Women have that choice too. Yet they still need abortions……
/r/MensRights30/11/22 01:23 PM
5

Think about it, women and men both chose to have sex but after the fact the woman gets to choose again whereas the man does not. You don’t think that’s a double standard?
/r/MensRights30/11/22 01:14 PM
2

That makes it a male only thing. A woman gets a a year of statutory maternity leave regardless of how long she’s been employed.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:33 PM
7

That’s not it at all. It’s the double standard. Women have that choice but men don’t. The woman decides if the man is going to be a father or not.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:10 PM
2

Not in the uk, here the definition of rape excludes women from being charged with it so only the man could be considered guilty.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 07:11 PM
13

You never hear about de cela though only incels, and incels are the only ones who are shamed for their actions. There’s very much a positive image of independent women who do not need or want men. The same cannot be said for their male counterparts.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 06:49 PM
2

This is the problem. You’re absolutely right and it shouldn’t be that way. If she wasn’t fit to consent and he was in the same condition then neither was he fit to consent.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 06:46 PM
28

I don’t think it does. How often do you hear women being put down for being unable to pick up or satisfy men? How often is femcel used as an insult to discredit a woman?
/r/MensRights27/11/22 06:24 PM
43

Most men are brainwashed into believing that our only value is in pleasing women.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 06:11 PM
15

If they’re stats are right then all they’re actually proving is that the woman wasn’t contributing 50/50 through the marriage.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 05:56 PM
31

Physically attack? I would love for such a man to physically attack me. You can’t defend yourself against a woman because the law will be on her side but a man is a different story. Attack me for seeing reality instead of being brainwashed by feminists hell yeah I’ll enjoy teaching him the errors of his ways.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 05:33 PM
1

Yet you post here that all men need to do better why call out all men but not all women?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 09:41 PM
1

I don’t know why they hate us either but they do, and yes I am against that. I have experienced things that shouldn’t happen to anyone and feminists fight to ensure that it keeps happening to men.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 05:48 PM
1

And I’ll bet if you tell them that you’re a man who was abused by a woman you’ll get one of two responses, You are lying. You are statistically insignificant
/r/MensRights26/11/22 05:35 PM
1

Now I know you’re lying. They’re not capable of being civil when you don’t mirror their bs. You should hear some of the stuff they say when you tell them you’re anti feminist. There can’t be a good outcome for everyone because a good outcome for feminists can only be a bad outcome for men.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 05:34 PM
1

There can’t be a good outcome for everyone. I understand that abusers lie but women are usually believed in those lies. The odds are stacked against us. Feminists will be nice to you because you agree with them, the second you don’t you’ll see a different side to them. Equally banning anyone who disagrees with you isn’t because of trolls. We get lots of trolls on this sun but people don’t get banned for having a different point of view.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 05:22 PM
1

People have done. They usually get banned as soon as they do…… Feminists will actively deny that women abuse men. I’ve seen it and fallen victim to it. My abusive ex was actively supported by a feminist organisation. She claimed I was the abuser and they tried very hard to have me imprisoned luckily the jury saw through it. Feminists hate men and would absolutely never do anything to help us.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 05:03 PM
1

Why are you downplaying the issue?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:55 PM
1

Again why aren’t women held to that same standard?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:55 PM
1

I don’t know what your country is like but what I say is an accurate representation of life in the uk. Also there is no patriarchy, if you honestly think that there is you’ve been brainwashed.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:37 PM
1

Most men don’t talk of it because they know they’ll be laughed at, ridiculed or ostracised if they do. There was actually a study done in 2010 in the USA by the CDC which indicated most men don’t recognise when they’re being abused. Basically they asked outright have you been a victim of domestic abuse and most of the men said no. Then they asked about specific behaviours. For example; have you ever been punched by an intimate partner. They found that most of the men then said yes.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:35 PM
1

You’re being incredibly inconsistent. You’re saying you’re not insulting my mental health but then when I point out you directly did you’re saying it’s a figure of speech. You’re saying you aren’t trolling but doing a pretty good job of showing otherwise. You’re saying that you can’t judge women as a gender by the actions of some but judging men as a gender by the actions of some. I think maybe you should look at your own mental health.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:17 PM
1

Then you’re in the wrong place. Also you are insulting my mental health. You directly stated that I’m out of my mind.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:07 PM
1

I didn’t say every time I talk to a women I said the majority of women are abusers. Stop making things up.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:05 PM
2

No what you said is we should do better. And on that note why don’t women call out their abusive counterparts?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:04 PM
2

Also you should look around. I actually posted on this very sub less than a week ago that the lack of therapeutic resources for male victims of abuse is a worry. But still constantly trying to insult my mental health doesn’t discredit my experience
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:03 PM
0

Victim blaming too. Nice.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:01 PM
1

It is bashing. You’re pretty much saying men are all rapists by saying we all need to be better. If another man is a rapist it’s entirely on him not anyone else.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:51 PM
2

It’s not just my experience though. I have hundreds of colleagues who say the same thing, some of whom are women themselves. Also I’m not out of my mind. I would appreciate it you avoided personal insults like that.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:49 PM
2

I openly stated in my first comment that I’m here because of mistreatment by women. My mother was abusive, every girlfriend I’ve had had also has been. I take verbal and physical abuse from people at work daily and the majority of it comes from women. The root of the issue is that women are free to be as abusive as they like. That does not mean that my experiences are somehow invalid. This whole thing of putting men down because they’ve been victimised is wrong.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:47 PM
2

No you are bashing. You might want to reread what you said. Besides who holds women accountable? When did that happen?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:45 PM
3

Women are much more likely to become violent. The reason being that they have no fear of consequences. She knows that she’s unlikely to be hit back and even she is bystanders are likely to attack any man who hits back and if they don’t then the man is likely to be arrested. If however the police become involved in her attacking someone she is unlikely to face charges.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:42 PM
2

Also did you say the same to your girlfriend when she implied that the majority of men are rapists? No instead you came here to bash us.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:39 PM
3

My mother is abusive. I was abused as a child.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:38 PM
3

And to say it’s ridiculous is jus ignorant. I’ve literally never met a woman who isn’t abusive.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:33 PM
3

You’ll find that women commit a lot of abuse that society just doesn’t care about. If you’ve got any real experience in security you will know that women are very violent.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:31 PM
7

That’s not what most men are like. You’ll find a lot of men in this sub are here because of the way they’ve been mistreated by women. That’s certainly how I came to be here. The majority of women are at minimum emotionally abusive. They can conduct that abuse in the open and not only will most people ignore it but they’ll actively blame the man. It’s bs and needs to change. Women aren’t victimised anywhere near as much as they claim. I’ve spent my entire adult life in security. I work as a doorm…
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:15 PM
8

Like I say though individual choice isn’t the issue. Social pressure is. Likewise dishonest women claiming they want to work but then once they have the opportunity changing that the lab or otherwise trapping the man is also an issue.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 02:10 PM
14

The trouble is that for her to have that choice means that a man has to provide for her. Now that’s ok if he he is doing so by choice. However that’s often not the case. If pressure to be a homemaker is off women the pressure to be a provider should come off men as well which it hasn’t and feminists will not let that happen. Plus, that approach requires an honest woman who won’t manipulate the man into the arrangement. How often do you see such a woman?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 01:54 PM
27

True but also there’s a lot of pressure on men to provide and most crumble under that pressure. The best way would be a mgtow approach to show the women some reality. If all men stopped providing for these women they would have to adapt and d’ovidé for themselves this breaking the cycle but that won’t happen because barely any men will do it.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 10:25 AM
4

I have been thinking that for a while
/r/MensRights26/11/22 05:34 AM
10

I follow IFLscience on Facebook and for a few months now it’s been spamming man bashing articles.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 05:27 PM
5

Op isn’t making his point well but it a actually is a valid one. He’s referring to the double standard. You see as a man if you express any kind preference at all women will consider you a misogynist whereas women are allowed to have any preferences they like. For example if a woman says she refuses to even talk to any man who is less than 6ft tall that’s fine. If a man was to say he refuses to date overweight women however he’s labelled as a misogynist. That’s the type of thing op is referring …
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/22 08:37 AM
4

You’re completely wrong but I must ask, why does the idea of mens rights offend you so much that you would seek out a sub to troll on the subject?
/r/AntiFeminists23/11/22 03:04 PM
8

This sub is not about dating.
/r/AntiFeminists23/11/22 02:54 PM
7

Thank you
/r/MensRights19/11/22 08:28 PM
11

I was asked “have you ever tried discord” I said no I don’t know what it is. That is an honest answer to what I was asked that’s all it is. You clearly have an issue to label it anything else.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 05:13 PM
7

What exactly is your problem?
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:48 PM
8

And maybe you should look again because 2 minutes before you posted your reply I posted that I would look into discord. Does that fit with accusation that I’m rejecting help?
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:45 PM
9

Not knowing knowing what something is, isn’t the same as rejecting it so you might want to consider that. I was asked if I had tried discord and I gave an honest reply. I have made genuine efforts to seek help I’m not rejecting it at all. So maybe stop posting false information about people.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:39 PM
3

I’ll look into that thanks
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:32 PM
17

That’s the problem, they actively try to hide the fact that male victims exist because it’s a detriment to them
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:25 PM
1

I have never used discord, I don’t really know what it is to be honest
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:24 PM
3

They’re way too expensive unfortunately.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:21 PM
1

Ask them to help you find local resources for supporting men who are victims of domestic violence. Ask them to explain why the homeless community is primarily made up of men. Ask them why the vast majority of workplace fatalities are men. Ask them why only men are ever forced to fight wars. The list goes on but when you’re done with that ask them when was the last time they discussed these issues.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 10:12 AM
15

Or become one himself….. A lot of these women don’t realise this type of thing causes psychological damage that could cause the boys raised this way to become the very thing that they claim to be in fear of. He could easily adopt a mindset of being whatever his mother is telling him men are, because after all he will be a man. Equally he could just end up hating women because he believes they have wronged him by making him feel that he is wrong for existing, based on his mothers brainwashing. He…
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/22 05:42 PM
494

Play them at their own game. Email HR about how much the day means to you, point out every one of the issues raised has impacted you personally and the day made you feel valued, but end by pointing out that the action of these women has left you feeling dehumanised and depressed. Ask HR to provide you with therapy to overcome those issues and time off to heal.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 04:24 PM
25

It’s a nice idea. I don’t think it happens often though.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 10:15 AM
2

And I’m going to believe my experience more than I believe someone who set up a Reddit just to leave troll comments in this sub. Frankly, I’ve told you reality, I don’t care if you believe it or not.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 10:13 AM
1

No it’s what i face out there every night. It looks to me like you’re the one with confirmation bias. Seeing as you’re making an effort to invalidate everyone’s experiences on this thread.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 10:09 AM
1

A few men do, but the scale is totally different. It’s rare to find a woman who can be told no without getting like that.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 10:04 AM
1

You fail to realise that there’s a lot of women who will use any insult they think will hurt you if you don’t give them whatever they want. Incel is currently a buzzword. A lot of women use it simply because they perceive it as something that would cause emotional pain. I’ve spent most of my adult life in night club security and I can tell you that saying no to a woman, for anything, mostly ends in irrational insults. For example I once had a woman call me a pedophile because I wouldn’t let her …
/r/MensRights18/11/22 09:55 AM
1

They may not all be murderers but a large number of them are abusers. The system is setup to take their side so it’s not worth taking a chance
/r/MensRights18/11/22 09:48 AM
1

The nature of the UK family courts makes it pretty much impossible to give an example. They’re shrouded in secrecy.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 05:11 PM
2

There’s been suggestion of such but it’s not exactly reliable. The brain scan only picks up an increase in activity but you can’t tell if it’s empathy or something else. It’s basically a guess based on which parts of the brain are active. The whole scan for psychopathy thing is in early days too but it actually looks at brain development as opposed to activity. The theory being that certain parts of a psychopaths brain are have less volume than that of non-psychopaths but the research leaves a l…
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:38 PM
6

That’s what feminists would have the world believe…
/r/MensRights13/11/22 08:36 PM
16

I don’t see it that way, I don’t need women to obey me. Having respect and empathy for each other however is totally different.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 05:25 PM
25

Which tells you they care less about men. Take a look around you, how often do women show men empathy? As I said above most men have not experienced women showing them empathy.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 02:52 PM
23

I believe otherwise. If they are willing to deliver potentially fatal electric shocks only to one gender. That indicates they don’t care much for members of that gender.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 02:43 PM
25

Yes, but that doesn’t explain why they were less likely to shock women than they were to shock men.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 02:41 PM
42

How does one gauge empathy? What you mean is that they report feeling empathetic more often than men do. That doesn’t make it real. I was studying psychology a while, I did not finish the course, but I remember discussing milgram’s obedience experiments. There was replications of his experiments which pointed to this. In these experiments people were tested to see if they would continuously deliver electric shocks of increasing intensity to a person who had complained of a heart condition and wo…
/r/MensRights13/11/22 01:21 PM
110

Not many women are capable of empathy towards men. It’s always nice to see the occasional one who does.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:06 AM
17

Most men on this sub have suffered the real life effects of misandry. Your comment is hateful and sexist.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 05:53 AM
13

Feminists actively fight against equality. Take a look at their actions instead of their words
/r/AntiFeminists03/11/22 04:57 PM
8

None of that brings back her victims. She was evil, how she came to be that doesn’t mean very much. She does not deserve any sympathy. Equally if you actually heard her in court how she reacted to being sentenced. For her it very much was an excuse.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 03:03 PM
12

That doesn’t justify what she did. I’ve had a hard life, that doesn’t make it ok for me to be violent. Many others have had a hard life but aren’t killing anyone
/r/MensRights02/11/22 11:20 AM
6

It’s reality look around you you’ll see it. I know I’ve lived it. And try family courts and social workers they are the ones telling us it is normal.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 09:51 AM
4

And yet almost every woman uses this tactic. That’s what this post is about. We all know this is what abusers do the question is why do almost all women do it? And of course why are men told it’s normal behaviour and we should accept it?
/r/MensRights01/11/22 09:18 AM
12

I went through seven years as a domestic violence victim but because I’m a man and my abuser is a woman, not only do I not get justice but I actually get punished for speaking up. Men don’t deserve to suffer just because women like you want us too. We deserve our voice to be heard. So fuck you!
/r/AntiFeminists30/10/22 09:01 PM
9

Explain to him how democracy works. You might just blow his mind. It doesn’t matter if more men are in power because if they don’t do what the voters want they will no longer be in power. Since 1980, women have made up the majority of voters…..
/r/MensRights28/10/22 09:07 AM
3

It’s more women than men, any one with half a brain can see that. I guess that would rule you out then….. It’s clear that you are just coming to this sub to troll, why don’t you try getting a life?
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/22 08:08 PM
6

It’s not men using the real man trope it’s women. If you don’t see that then you must be blind. So at best it’s toxic femininity, this idea of you either conform to what women want you to be or you are not a real man. Women don’t just play a part in this culture they are the ones who created and maintain it.
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/22 03:51 PM
4

From their longer lifespans? Is that what gives you the idea that their health is less looked after? Op is posting about his experience with the NHS and I can safely state that he’s right. The NHS most definitely do prioritise women.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 03:53 AM
74

I got permanently banned for telling a woman that she was wrong to deny her child’s father access simply because she was upset by the break up. All I did was point out that a fathers rights to his children shouldn’t depend on the mothers emotions and they banned me for sexism. So I’m not surprised it’s a feminist page
/r/MensRights11/10/22 08:39 PM
8

You mean you won’t accept reality
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/22 03:45 AM
4

I live in London and had never heard of this until now. I could’ve really been doing with it a few years back. It’s definitely a good thing I think it needs to be promoted more though so people are aware of it
/r/MensRights06/10/22 03:19 AM
3

No, not at all. It is not ok to be sexually attracted to children. The reality is that gender should not come into it. The problem however is that society doesn’t recognise woman’s predatory behaviour. When men do this stuff it’s, quite rightly, considered abhorrent and if he acts on it he will be punished. It should be the same for women. I don’t think anyone on this sub wants male predators to be accepted, however we also don’t want female ones to be.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:54 AM
9

Yes of course we should just be willing to serve a life sentence just because some woman says so. The majority of rape allegations are false, but you think that women should be defended when taking a man’s freedom away.
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/22 11:39 PM
3

Has she faced any consequences?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:40 AM
39

You’re exactly right
/r/MensRights28/09/22 12:18 AM
7

I’ve had all but one, the selfishness one.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 01:53 AM
1

Where are you getting that from? The law wasn’t fully repealed until the sexual offences act 2003 so not exactly a century…..
/r/MensRights20/09/22 09:09 PM
1

It isn’t anymore but in 1885 it was criminalised by section 11 of the criminal law amendment act. It was stated as ‘acts of gross indecency. People believe that queen Victoria said she didn’t believe that women were capable of lesbianism, however that’s unlikely to be true. Lesbian relationships were common at the time. Either way she was willing to punish men for being gay but not women. Parliament debated the issue in 1921 but opted to keep the same law. Of course it has since been repealed.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 04:25 PM
2

Yes if she refuses then the case is automatically closed. And rightly so there’s only one reason to refuse
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:40 AM
2

I’ve based my comment on a booklet published by the cms
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:26 AM
6

Besides you’ve already admitted that you’re a troll on a previous post, get a life https://www.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/xcj822/why_are_feminists_so_shameless/io88boe/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 09:25 AM
10

You are a moron. Women were not actually oppressed they were protected, take an objective look and you’ll understand.
/r/AntiFeminists16/09/22 09:19 AM
21

Im in the uk, none of us own guns yet 3 times more men kill themselves than women
/r/MensRights16/09/22 05:40 AM
27

With this I always point out that when it was a crime to be gay in the uk that law only applied to men. Now I in no way support homosexuality being illegal before anyone jumps to that, the law shouldn’t have existed at all but it did exist and was only in relation to men. Same sex relations between women were never illegal. The reason for this being that queen Victoria, the monarch at the time the was passed, would not give royal assent to such a law if it included women.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 01:47 AM
10

I agree but that seems to be how they think. No matter what horrendous act a woman commits they will view her with sympathy
/r/AntiFeminists15/09/22 11:59 PM
31

They’ll probably end up blaming it on her grief over his death. I think it’s similar to the argument that was presented a few years back that women suffer more than men during war, because their brothers and husbands are killed.
/r/AntiFeminists15/09/22 11:46 PM
15

That doesn’t happen, anti feminists are not pointing the finger at women we are simply seeking fair treatment. Feminists do however seek to avoid women taking responsibility for the bad things they do.
/r/AntiFeminists15/09/22 11:41 PM
32

Unfortunately you will initially be presumed as the parent and have to pay child maintenance if she claims it. However you can challenge that decision and get a dna test. You have to pay for the test, but if she refuses it then the case will be closed and you won’t have to pay more. If however, the test is done and shows that you aren’t the father then any money you gave as maintenance will be refunded and so will the cost of the test. As to women judging you, good luck with that…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 11:22 PM
1

You’re just here trolling, honestly do you have nothing better to do? If you believe that of this sub then bye.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 10:33 AM
10

I was thinking exactly the same thing
/r/MensRights08/09/22 09:22 PM
26

Then you’re rambling. Go do that somewhere else.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 09:20 AM
3

Their interpretations dont vary very much though. You’ll find that most of the law is quite well defined. There are certain areas open to be interpreted but nowhere near as much as you seem to believe.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 08:42 AM
3

Maybe try going to the uk courts and watching some cases you might form a better view if you did
/r/MensRights06/09/22 08:16 AM
4

If they stray away from the defined law then the cps can appeal and a judge will declare it a mistrial thus voiding the verdict
/r/MensRights06/09/22 08:04 AM
4

Juries in the uk aren’t as free as you think. The judge will explain the law to them and how it’s defined they just decide decide if the burden of proof has been met. The judge is allowed to even direct them on which verdict to return. They’re not obliged to return the directed verdict but they usually do.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 07:43 AM
3

Are you really that ignorant of your own words? You said layman decide
/r/MensRights06/09/22 07:18 AM
3

“They deliver a verdict….and now you might want to think about why in the Uk stealthing is classified as rape, while In Germany it’s sexual assault? May that be, because in the UK layman decide about that?” You said that, you said that layman decide how the law is defined you later defended that by stating that juries are not lawyers. Did you forget saying that or do you just not know what you’re saying?
/r/MensRights06/09/22 07:16 AM
3

Your asserting that juries get write legal definitions which is absurdly false.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 06:54 AM
3

If they’ve been found not guilty then what choice is there? Are you suggesting that once a person has been acquitted by a jury the cps will insist they’re imprisoned anyway?
/r/MensRights06/09/22 06:36 AM
3

No they won’t. That’s decided by the cps they put forward an indictment. Potentially the jury could find not guilty and the cps could indict for an alternative charge but that means a new trial.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:55 AM
4

You’ve just shown that you do not understand the system at all. The cps decides which charge the defendant is indicted on. The jury can then choose guilty or not guilty. They don’t choose the offence.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:04 AM
3

But they have no say in how the law is written. They are guided by the judge on what the law is, I don’t think you understand how the system works.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 04:43 AM
3

Layman? Uk law is decided in two ways, statue law which is written by parliament or common law which is based around previous judgements made by judges not verdicts that are returned by juries.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 04:35 AM
3

While you’re right about the differences in jurisdictions. I have to correct you relating to your jury comment. In the uk a jury has nothing to do with sentencing they deliver a verdict and that is all. A judge will pass sentence at a later hearing. That said, while stealthing is an offence in the uk I would be very surprised if a woman were to be charged in such circumstances.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 10:15 PM
2

They already have it
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:26 AM
28

There seems to be a direct correlation, at least from what I can see, between losing the looks to be successful in the sex industry and the change of opinion. The pattern is to ride it while in demand take what you can get from it then once the demand is gone denounce it and claim oppression
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:38 PM
15

True, but based on personal experience. Both in my personal life and my experience in the security industry. I would say that women are actually more violent than men. This doesn’t get noticed because they’re less capable of causing injuries and as such it rarely gets taken seriously if reported at all.
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/22 07:29 PM
37

The 2005 study explains it all. Women use indirect aggression. They manipulate others to carry out the attacks so as to avoid the consequences. In reality that is no different to actually committing the attacks
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/22 07:18 PM
11

Well why should the man always pay anyway? Why do women just want free stuff?
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/22 06:52 PM
26

And you have non bias sources to back this up? Women are every bit as violent as men they’re just manipulative enough to portray themselves as victims even when they are perpetrators
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/22 06:50 PM
1

Politicians seek votes and most voters are women…..
/r/MensRights29/08/22 01:08 AM
2

I remember feeling that the uk honestly has no hope of survival after hearing parliament debate the razor vs tampon tax issue. Feminists were arguing that mens razors are exempt from vat due to being an essential item whereas tampons were considered a luxury item and as such subject to vat. Eventually tampons were made exempt from vat. Why this got to me is that mens razors were subject to vat just the same as tampons, razors still are subject to vat. Not a single mp knew that…….. or at least no…
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/22 02:56 AM
8

Total bs It doesn’t even try. Feminists are evil no way round it.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 10:13 PM
4

Unfortunately we live in a time where there’s an agenda, society wants us to believe that only women can be victims.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:00 AM
10

I worked security in a gay bar for 9 months. The only trouble we had was with women. We had to stop letting them in, though you can’t actually tell them why. We would simply say there’s a guest list. The trouble is they go in there saying they don’t want male attention but after a couple of drinks they change their mind and start harassing the gay guys. We were dealing with several sexual assaults each night and you just can’t explain to those woman that what they’ve done is wrong, they just can…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 10:50 AM
32

I still say you’re wrong. Regardless of how sure you feel of my experiences you still do not know. People here may be open minded but that doesn’t mean we have to believe that you are right. Most of us have experienced these things first hand. We know that feminists deliberately manipulate statistics, we know that male victims almost never report what happens to them, we know that system is designed to punish us when we do. How is my reply anything like toxic feminists? Because I don’t blindly f…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 10:20 AM
43

You’re wrong. If you were right sub reddits like mens rights wouldn’t exist at all. You’re clearly ignorant as to what we actually experience as men. Women harassing or abusing men happens way more than you think. The problem is society forces us to ignore it hence the statistics not acknowledging it. There was a study done back in 2010 by the cdc in the USA whereby they asked men if they had been victims of domestic abuse and while I can’t remember the exact numbers, almost all participants sai…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 09:54 AM
26

I’ve never once seen it and I’ve been on this sub for a couple of years, which posts are you referring to?
/r/MensRights19/08/22 05:52 AM
54

Such a popular phrase that I’ve never seen it used in this sub………
/r/MensRights19/08/22 05:50 AM
15

I believe that’s the benefit of Johnny Depp’s case. It made me hope that things will change.
/r/AntiFeminists19/08/22 03:13 AM
5

Do you have any facts to back that up? With such a statement I think you must be completely ignorant to history.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 10:46 PM
1

Yes it requires mass participation. It’d basically be a strike
/r/MensRights14/08/22 09:18 PM
3

I believe you are incorrect. Could you please elaborate?
/r/MensRights14/08/22 09:16 PM
3

Perhaps but all these years of basically being worshipped by men has turned them into narcissists that won’t be solved easily. Ignoring them is the best solution but how effective it will be is another matter.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 09:28 AM
4

I’ve had a similar thought but I honestly don’t think a month is enough. There’s a very skewed dynamic between the sexes these days. I think most women don’t even realise how much they take from us it’ll take time for them to wake up
/r/MensRights14/08/22 09:05 AM
2

Totally disgusting. It’s one of the many injustices that amount to oppression of men and why we need a mens rights movement
/r/MensRights05/08/22 12:43 AM
2

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/ There you go
/r/MensRights04/08/22 11:01 PM
1

Fair enough
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:58 PM
3

Pretty sure he’s older than 4 though. That said a quick look at his comments here show that he hasn’t changed.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:57 PM
5

He hasn’t grown out of it. It was only 13 days ago and he clearly stated that he had never said it until you posted the link. He is just here to troll.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:55 PM
5

Stop being a hypocrite, you are accusing others of the things that you are doing. I won’t be responding further.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:17 PM
3

He is clearly a troll, and a moron.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:14 PM
6

So because it didn’t happen to you the rest of us don’t matter? It happens a lot, to a lot of men. Why have you come to this group? What are you trying to achieve? I already asked but you didn’t answer. I’m here to support men having equal rights, it looks to me like you’re here to argue against that
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:12 PM
6

You’re troll it’s pretty obvious so go do your troll thing elsewhere
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:07 PM
5

Do you speak English? Because if you tell someone you disagree with them you are telling them you believe they are wrong.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:03 PM
5

Opposite way bro, I told you my experience. You are saying I’m wrong. What are you hoping to achieve here?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:59 PM
9

Disagree as much as you like it doesnt change reality
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:41 PM
15

If you ever go through the family courts as a male victim of domestic abuse you’ll understand how men can be oppressed. They will directly tell you that the reason you can’t possibly be victim is that men are abusers not women. Statistical evidence becomes more valuable than physical evidence. It’s completely insane but that’s what happens. In my own case I was even told that my alleging that a woman had abused me was offensive to all women, I never understood how it’s offensive or why but that’…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 09:31 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:19 AM
1

I once heard of a case where a woman gave oral sex to a cab driver, then ran upstairs with his sperm in her mouth which her and her two flat mates impregnated themselves with. All three woman successfully claimed child support. Can’t remember where I read it though. But that’s the type of thing being referred to
/r/MensRights24/07/22 03:29 PM
8

Straight to the no true Scotsman argument. How predictable. You honestly think we haven’t heard these empty words thousands of times?
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 02:37 AM
8

We judge what feminists do, not what they say. If you did the same you’d know they have no interest in equality
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 02:33 AM
2

I posted a reply to some comments on Facebook pointing out that the statement “a real man wouldn’t care about that” is sexist, I got a ton of responses from women calling me sexist, god knows how they refused to explain. Then I got notified that Facebook had removed my comments as they went against community guidelines on spam.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 03:29 AM
53

I tried that argument with them before because it’s very much valid. The comeback is usually to say that the violence is perpetrated by men so men remain as the problem. Or alternatively they say men are targeted for reasons other than gender while women are targeted because of gender Trying to debate with a feminist is like playing chess with a pigeon. It doesn’t matter how well you play the pigeon will knock over the pieces, crap all over the board then strut around triumphantly
/r/MensRights15/07/22 05:51 AM
1

You’re flip flopping because that’s not at all what your previous comment said: That’s not really how that works. You don’t have to play equal, because that’s impossible to reach for women. But they should bring in around the same amount of money. That’s what you said
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:34 AM
2

That’s quite insulting, perhaps you should look at your post, you admit they do not play equal but then say they should bring in around the same money. You didn’t mention the difference in revenue at all. So instead of trying to imply that people can’t read perhaps look at what you’ve actually written
/r/MensRights14/07/22 06:15 AM
2

So you don’t believe in pay equality then? If they are not playing equal then they are not doing an equal job. Pay equality is equal pay for an equal job. Pay Is usually based on the revenue you bring if the male players are selling more tickets, merchandise etc then they will get paid more, and with good reason too.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:04 AM
8

The whole point is that he is not the father, why are you incapable of understanding that? The woman tricking him into being the father doesn’t change the fact that he is not!
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:59 AM
9

The man did not abandon the child, the mother did. You just don’t get it do you? this type of thing is how women enslave men. I was in this guys shoes and did not abandon the girl I had considered my daughter, fast forward to her teen years and she won’t even talk to me because she blames me for the fact that she might not be my daughter, I know how the guy feels and honestly in hindsight, my best option at that time would have been suicide. The guy is not the bad one in this he isn’t the one to…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:58 AM
9

Still he is not to blame for it the mother is, he is a victim just like the child.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:52 AM
8

It’s not his responsibility. Further she is entirely to blame. The man and the child are her victims.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:50 AM
12

Actually it makes a good point, he’s not the father the responsibility is not his to bear. Yet everyone is judging him for simply walking away. The rest of the family, who do have responsibility aren’t being judged. The mother, whose behaviour caused all of this has disappeared, yet the ficus is on the man. He is not the one who abandoned this child.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:49 AM
14

Actually what you’re advocating here is slavery
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:38 AM
20

Actually the article is about the fact that he did not have a child.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:37 AM
25

He didn’t though, he walked away from something he couldn’t cope with. The blame here lies entirely with the mother. Where is she exactly? You’re slamming the man who was a victim of fraud but why did she abandon HER child? Why did the rest of the family abandon him? Why is this child the responsibility of a man who is not even related to him at a time of emotional turmoil?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:36 AM
28

The guy has emotions, he is not a fucking robot. Perhaps he wasn’t able to cope? It happens so stop being such a cunt.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:28 AM
23

That’s the point he didn’t have a child he only thought he did.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:22 AM
18

It’s not that simple, the man has just found out the last 5 years of his life was based on a lie. Abandoning the child isn’t the right way but you can’t really judge him for it.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:21 AM
4

I find that to be a bit of a get out clause for a lot of feminists when debating gender roles. Along the lines of “a woman doesn’t need a man to provide, protect etc but a real man does it anyway” I’ve heard crap like that so many times and it makes my blood boil. Imagine the reverse “ a woman doesn’t have to cook, clean and raise children, but a real woman would anyway” I bet they wouldn’t tolerate that being said.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 05:36 AM
3

I don’t think he’s implying anything really. It could be that in the area he lives there are not many cases of fathers killing children but even so so he only stated that he personally hasn’t heard much on that. Doesn’t mean anything other than him not hearing of those cases.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 06:38 PM
1

Perhaps, but your allegation of faking statistics was wrong. No one faked any statistics. A reference was made to a particular case and the commenter stated that he doesn’t hear much about fathers killing children. Just because you have heard about these thing doesn’t mean that everyone has.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 06:29 PM
1

No he isn’t, he said only that he doesn’t hear much of fathers killing children. You’re saying he made up statistics, he didn’t even mention statistics at all.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 06:24 PM
4

Whose spreading misinformation? Op is asking which gender is most often killed by filicide, no one is faking stats. Which by the way the last study I saw on the matter did suggest that while the numbers among newborns are approximately equal. With older children boys make up the majority of victims. Although which parent kills them is close to even with mothers killing just slightly more than fathers.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 05:33 PM
6

On this sub our anger comes from the disparity in sentencing. Women receive much less jail time when they do these things. It should be a life sentence regardless of gender. My own personal cause is domestic abuse where the system is designed to make male victims look like abusers. The statistics there are heavily manipulated.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 05:19 PM
8

The filicide statistics show that it’s actually almost even numbers.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:00 PM
3

Was that related to the killer though, I saw similar comments but they related to the woman who found the body, apparently this brings another shock as it turns out to have been her grandson if that’s the case I agree, poor woman poor baby. That said if the comment is related to the killer then it just sick
/r/MensRights08/07/22 08:05 AM
2

Yes, and it can happen in either direction. I believe that there’s more false allegations than there are genuine. Although there’s no way any of us can be 100% sure. I do however know a lot of instances where I can be categorically sure that the allegation is false.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 08:27 PM
1

The trouble is that it’s impossible to be sure. There are times when an allegation can be proven false but often times it can’t be proven either way. It makes it impossible to know the scale of the problem. This is why feminism has an issue, they push for an approach of simply accepting women’s words as fact but people of either gender lie. I believe women do it more than men because of the fact that they are more likely to be believed. Every time I’ve spoke of this with a feminist they claim on…
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 08:03 PM
1

They did try to raise awareness of the issues. They’re the only group, to my knowledge, who have actually brought attention to the issues in family courts.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 07:34 PM
3

Fathers 4 justice have tried. The truth is no one listens
/r/MensRights07/07/22 04:51 AM
5

That was brillant!
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 05:37 AM
17

The point is bodily autonomy. Women want it themselves but can’t see that circumcising an infant removes their autonomy. If your fiancé wants to be circumcised then that’s his choice and adults can get circumcised. Not every man wants it and it should be our right to choose. That’s the point and what it shows is that women don’t want equality, if you did you would be against parents circumcising infants so as to extend bodily autonomy to boys/men not just women.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:47 PM
5

Exactly, the problem lies in the double standard rather than with women having preferences. When men having preferences were just as valid as women having them I didn’t hear anyone complaining it’s only now that we are expected not to have any preferences that a problem exists.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 09:15 AM
2

Exactly, and neither does the uk.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:37 AM
23

They said “cry more”
/r/MensRights29/04/22 02:32 AM
34

That’s really your response to child abuse?
/r/MensRights29/04/22 02:00 AM
3

What annoys me here the most is that she caused £10k worth of damage but only had to pay £400.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 06:43 AM
7

I took the survey and to be fair it was gender neutral. Unlike the support services it asks about.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 05:13 AM
8

It’s also the hypocrisy those people display. They will openly state that they blame men’s behaviour for misandrist attitudes displayed by women. If however you present them with a man who is weary of women after having fallen victim to abuse at the hands of one or more women they will equally blame said man for his “misogyny”. They forget that the majority of child abuse is perpetrated by mothers. The two scenarios are exactly the same thing just with genders swapped but feminists will define o…
/r/MensRights25/01/22 08:58 PM
4

I don’t think you understand that these acts are non consensual, just because we are men does not mean that any woman who so chooses can touch our body at their whim. Also I don’t care whether or not you believe me, my experience is real whether you believe it or not.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 12:43 AM
3

As far as I’m concerned it is predatory behaviour. If you witness the things I do on a regular basis you’d understand. Women tend to behave much like wolves hunting their prey when they go out in a group.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 12:35 AM
11

I’m honestly surprised to see this make it into court. Glad though. I work in nightclub security and women sexually assault men in clubs on a nightly basis. They have no concept of consent when applied to men. To them it’s their right to do it. Trouble is that you can’t involve the police because 99.9% of the time they won’t attend. I suspect in this case the real reason for police involvement is the abh charge. Usually they would just be removed from the venue, only to stand at the door abusing…
/r/MensRights19/08/21 04:16 AM
15

I thought the exact same when I read this article. I couldn’t help but compare it to the estate agent who was charged with assault on Chris Whitty. Harassment is laughed off of by a woman or group of women.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 05:36 AM
2

There are plenty of women who support men’s rights. It’s not a good idea to criticise them for that. It’s a good thing when women see beyond feminist narratives and understand our side
/r/MensRights12/03/21 01:29 PM
2

Family courts are already in secret, and my experience there is enough for me to be sure that secret courts are never a good thing.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 04:28 PM
1

For those judges yes, they say it’s to protect juvenile interest but it’s actually to protect them from the consequences of their judgements.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 04:17 PM
2

Family courts are held in secret so naming the judge, or public discussing details of court cases is considered contempt of court.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 04:05 PM
3

The uk I’m fairly certain I’ll end up in prison if I name the judge though.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 02:23 PM
3

Not sure if this one counts but I had a case in family courts, my ex was abusive but she alleged it was actually me who was abusive. We both had to write a schedule of allegations then respond to each other’s allegations. There was one instance where she caused an injury to a sensitive area of my anatomy, I’d rather not give details though. I did however detail the incident in my schedule of allegations. Point is that her response to that allegation was that making such an allegation was offensi…
/r/MensRights14/01/21 01:57 AM
3

The article actually does tell you that that she is actually trans.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 12:59 AM
3

I think the main point should be that the girl didn’t have the right to hit the boy in the first place. That’s something most people miss, regardless of gender violence is wrong. Through my work I see a lot of violence, it makes up the bulk of my job. Usually if the perpetrator is female there are no consequences. Actually a man pushing a woman away to stop her from punching him is more likely to be arrested than the woman who is punching him. The primary aggressor should be the one held respons…
/r/MensRights06/01/21 01:32 PM
5

No it wouldn’t, are you suggesting that intent can only be proven if it were a second incident? That’s utter nonsense. I personally have witnessed judges considering such attacks repeated. I saw judge Lyons do so at Wood Green crown court many times. A second punch is all that it needs to be considered repeated. You’re definitely wrong there Aside from that it wasn’t the first time she’s been arrested for assaulting him. So that kind of negates the point a bit.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 06:33 PM
5

Superficial wounds can still often result in a gbh charge. Above I gave an example of a case where a defendent was convicted of a section 20 despite only giving a superficial wound.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 05:55 PM
11

You might actually want to read the article you posted it proves I’m right. What proves intent: “A repeated or sustained attack” She stabbed him twice, therefore she repeated her initial attack. She prevented him from leaving the premise where the attack took place thereby preventing him from seeking medical aid, thus sustaining his injuries. “The deliberate choice of an offensive weapon or an equivalent such as a razor blade” She left the room, picked up a knife and returned. The fact that it’s…
/r/MensRights02/01/21 05:53 PM
13

Well my experience says it is, leaving the room to arm herself and giving a second wound proves there was intent to cause wounding at minimum
/r/MensRights02/01/21 05:14 PM
23

I have read the article and section 18 Is wounding with intent. I’ve spent enough time around the court system to know that’s the usual charge in these cases. The intent is proven by the fact that there were two wounds, the fact that she left the room to get the the knife and the location of the wounds. I once saw a case where a man who was being abused by his girlfriend began self harming during a fight with her and stabbed a neighbour who intervened causing a superficial wound to his abdomen. …
/r/MensRights02/01/21 02:54 PM
41

Nonetheless the danger of stabbing someone in the chest should be considered it’s still a section 18 not abh. The depth of the wound does not bear any relevance to the intent. At minimum she intended to wound him and that’s enough for it to be a section 18. If it were a man doing so to a women he wouldn’t get off so lightly.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 02:28 PM
150

She stabbed him in the chest twice and got charged with abh!? Is the judge and the prosecutor mentally ill!? That’s a section 18 minimum but realistically it is attempted murder. The fact that the chest was targeted twice shows intent to endanger life, she further tried to make him stay put so no one sees him so she expected him to lay down and die. How the hell is that abh!?
/r/MensRights02/01/21 01:27 PM
1

I realise that this post was aimed at Kamala Harris’ policies and must apologise I’m not at all familiar with them. I’m a Brit and I don’t pay much attention to us politics. I only commented about the pay gap.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 07:08 AM
17

If I were looking for employees and I could pay a woman 25% less than a man to do the same job, why would I hire a man? I wouldn’t.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 06:18 AM
4

Actually read the article I posted, the judge actually says it’s her gender that kept her out of prison. In your articles that doesn’t happen. The sentences may be lenient but it’s not gender based.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 04:22 AM
0

Those are not in the uk, we’re talking about two completely different justice systems But I don’t think think the judge actually told them that she’d send a woman who did this to prison but will let them go because they’re men.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 04:18 AM
1

Also please tell me why this sentencing standard is ok. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-47914832
/r/MensRights30/11/20 04:14 AM
6

Ok, try working on the front line. I’ve literally seen men being arrested for breach of the peace because they’ve walked away from a woman hitting them. Furthermore given that 43% of reported victims of domestic violence are men how come there are 4000 refuge beds for women in the uk but only 33 for men?
/r/MensRights30/11/20 03:58 AM
6

The moj one is from 2018. Not so outdated. But I will say as well that I work in the security industry and see for myself the extent of this. I see violence every night of my life but if the perpetrator is a woman it gets nfa’d on the scene.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 03:33 AM
7

That’s nonsense, http://library.college.police.uk/docs/hofindings/r10.pdf https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/719819/female-offender-strategy.pdf There’s the police and the moj admitting that women are likely to be sentenced to community based sentences rather than prison. If you check through the comments on the thread you’ll also see I posted a link to a case where a judge openly admits that she would’ve sent a man in that particular …
/r/MensRights30/11/20 03:03 AM
10

So why don’t women get sentenced equally to men? It’s that double standard that’s the issue.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 12:59 AM
3

I know, you should see how the family courts operate here.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 08:41 PM
15

I think it highlights the problem perfectly. The judge openly admits she sentences men and women differently and no action was taken.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 08:31 PM
21

Try this one, the judge actually tells the woman it’s her gender that keeps her out of prison. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/id-jailed-you-you-were-2759697.amp
/r/MensRights29/11/20 08:20 PM
130

I was in an abusive relationship for 7 years. When I ended the relationship I got labelled the abuser by family courts, it was insane I had a lot of evidence of her abusing me but she only had her own word, they chose to believe her. She’s been convicted since of violence towards her next boyfriend, child abuse and harassment. I found that out from the police because I had to report her for harassment. Even now I don’t get believed and what you point out is the reason. That’s exactly the reactio…
/r/MensRights28/11/20 03:27 PM
11

What feminists do is blame men for everything. When we state that we have problems feminists scream patriarchy. It’s not helpful at all and it’s delusional. It’s victim blaming even.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 04:19 PM
1

Uk civil courts always find allegations made by women proven, in my own case I had several found proven. None of them are true and one is not even possible.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 02:30 AM
5

Unfortunately women sex offenders are not viewed as seriously as male ones are. It’s another double standard that society pushes on us. Pedophilia is wrong regardless of the perpetrators gender but the majority of people can’t accept that women commit such crimes. For the record, I disagree about her being hot too. I just don’t see it.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 08:16 PM
2

She vetoed the military action against Iraq bill in 1999, pretty sure the USA existed then
/r/MensRights09/08/20 06:48 PM
4

You say that but it was leaked in 2013 that the queen and prince Charles between them had secretly vetoed 39 bills so I’m thinking you might not be wholly correct there.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 06:32 PM
0

She wasn’t voted in but she has the final say on any laws. That’s quite a lot of power. No law can be passed in the uk without royal assent.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:06 PM
13

That’s been my experience if you deal with feminists most of them resort to name calling because you won’t just validate their beliefs
/r/MensRights27/05/20 10:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter