TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

organicchemistry1119 Archive

View 1 post and 196 comments by organicchemistry1119 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

To start, they should give out at least as many scholarships to men as they do to the supposedly disadvantaged women.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 08:54 AM
1

Ironically, women often make more money if you consider how much they make as a ratio to how much they work. It's just that men work harder to make more money for various reasons, one of which being that men need to make more money than women in order to have an equal quality of life to begin with. Normal men need to organize. Feminism and corrupt rich people are cancers to society. (Non-corrupt rich people are fine, but it seems that many, if not most, of the rich are corrupt.) You are not alon…
/r/MensRights25/07/26 04:31 AM
14

All while being labelled as privileged too.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 08:25 AM
1

Okay, then think of it as someone being able to unearn your kindness, where having it is the default.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 06:27 AM
1

That loss was really a purchase; you purchased clarity about your relationship.
/r/Divorce_Men15/07/26 08:16 AM
2

I always feel like I can't explain things to women without using an overly gentle approach or I'll be accused of "mansplaining." When I explain things to men instead, I feel such a weight off of my shoulders.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 07:15 AM
3

There are three sides to every story.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 06:31 AM
37

I'm shocked! /s
/r/MensRights27/06/26 12:33 PM
5

In my opinion, it's debatable from the point of view of the business, but if it's allowed by law (and the government), then it's sexism. I'm glad to see that it's illegal in the UK.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 07:12 AM
2

I want to be desired for who I am and not what I have or don't have.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 05:58 AM
17

Certain clubs apparently requiring that only men pay entrance fees. (I can't confirm because I don't go to clubs.)
/r/MensRights27/06/26 05:25 AM
1

Yes, knowing one can be in a relationship again afterward makes a huge psychological difference. Don't ever expect women to admit it, though; they'll just gaslight you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 02:59 PM
1

It's the same thing with CTV.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 08:55 PM
2

Yes, but it won't be delivered to us in a bow; we need to fight for it, politically, legally, etc.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 08:19 PM
10

Dating women really does feel like applying to a job, doesn't it? Conversely, womens' complaints are like those of hiring managers saying they can't find anyone qualified enough when there are so many candidates, but unfortunately for the hiring managers, the candidates want a living wage.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 08:08 PM
1

"And society often expects women to put more time and money into their appearance." I'm so fed up of seeing people say that. That's not true, at least for me. Women put that pressure on themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 08:07 PM
1

It affects your brain chemistry and causes physiological changes (with real-world side effects like attention-span and mood-control problems, etc.) that take time to be undone. So, imaginary stuff can in fact lead to physical changes and not noticing that is part of the problem men face without even realizing it.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 08:03 PM
3

There's a similar clause in my jurisdiction. I'm thinking more and more about going elsewhere (where there isn't such a clause or law) because there's a very real price to pay career-wise that will snowball if I stay where I currently reside and I'm struggling to even get a job to begin with (but it's hard to move because of family and friends). Rhetorically, why are there men that support these things? Are they older, unaffected men that don't see the downsides or something and are simultaneous…
/r/MensRights24/06/26 08:00 PM
1

It's because women face less, if any, consequences for speaking out (on an individual basis), unlike men. For men to not face consequences, they / we need huge numbers.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 01:03 PM
1

I don't know if there's more to learn about it, but I think it's understood quite well and there are books about it.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 12:19 PM
0

Porn addiction is worse than it seems on the surface.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 12:11 PM
0

Porn addiction is worse than it seems on the surface.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 12:11 PM
1

"Maybe this guy wants to have more men miserable and sexually frustrated, as to further push them into radical action?" I think this is what he intended, but with the idea that mens' collective action would break us out of this misery and frustration by working together to overcome the problem whereas porn is pacifying us into inaction. That kind of vaguely makes sense to me, actually. (Not that I agree with murdering anyone.)
/r/MensRights24/06/26 12:10 PM
16

I think the video game-playing is a side effect, not a cause, of the situation. I think the cause is seeing how unvalued we are and the so-called DEI policies, etc.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 09:52 AM
6

Non-human animals don't give their females rights either. You're basically proving my point that feminists want gender roles when gender roles convenience them and no gender roles when gender roles inconvenience them. How . . . convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 04:10 AM

I thought feminism was about equality. (I'm just kidding. I know it isn't.) And, I can't imagine someone wanting you for more than just sex, to be honest (based on what you're saying). Unfortunately, you will probably find weak men to exploit so you'll keep being the rotten trash you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:53 AM
4

So, basically, you think the man should pay for you because you're God's gift to him and he's lucky you even go to the restaurant with him (or something along those lines)?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:41 AM
6

Why 50/50? Why not just pay for one's own meal? That way the guy can eat more without feeling guilty he's dumping more financial burden on the girl too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:35 AM
0

I didn't mean asking to be in a relationship, but asking to go to a place like a restaurant.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:34 AM
3

Oh, please. That dynamic is full of deceit. They wait for you to invite them because that's one of the few cases where they care about gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 03:27 AM
2

But, vote in any election on your way out (if applicable) (for the men that are still there).
/r/MensRights19/06/26 06:08 AM
11

Well, I think Shania Twain's then-husband cheated with her next husband's then-wife, so I guess she saw that women harm men too so that situation would have been a "net zero" tally for hatred based on sex.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 04:08 AM
5

Not quickly enough, but progress is still progress.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 03:42 AM
1

If men speak out, they are shunned, so it's basically the men that have nothing to lose and women that have to do the speaking-out.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 03:03 AM
1

Young women also often outearn young men too and yet still claim to be oppressed and in need of assistive measures like female-specific scholarships and general governmental resources!
/r/MensRights07/06/26 06:03 AM
2

I think it'd be more productive if someone posts links like change.org petitions and asks others to sign rather than just venting. Men need to also collectively take voting and elections more seriously. That's why women are winning. They keep whining to government officials and voting while we just take it and even have some feminist men attacking fellow men as well. Even if you leave your country of origin, try to vote before leaving or, if possible, from an embassy or consulate.
/r/MensRights07/06/26 05:46 AM
1

Your last sentence is an assumption that can be incorrect. Are you assuming that the guy in question would know you existed and chose someone else? If so, I understand. Otherwise, it's possible that you'd be the one the guy would want to more than just fuck (i.e., be with in a serious relationship).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 05:35 AM
2

Did you forget a "/s"?
/r/MensRights03/06/26 09:43 AM
1

Actually, I also think that they think they are oppressed, but it's because they compare themselves to the most successful men, not typical men.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 09:42 AM
1

Not fighting back can happen with defection in conscriptions. The payments can be conditional on the war being won and paid out after the war (except perhaps for some minimal living wage during the war). They can also be paid out monthly instead of as a lump sum so as to minimize inflationary effects. No matter what, there is a cost. It's just about deciding which one is the smallest. In my opinion, paying money is the smallest cost.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 06:30 AM
1

I haven't seen that be successful, but I have seen it tried.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 06:26 AM
3

And, they're dominating because of those privileges.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 06:22 AM
1

The cost of fighting against your will and possibly dying after it is even higher. Edit: Also, the money would be held by locals that are protecting the country. That's not exactly a bad thing either.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 06:13 AM
0

I meant only during times of war.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 05:59 AM
1

I wouldn't want to fight for money, but the tax payers paying for it is not a problem if you ask me. It's basically having certain people / taxpayers paying those that actually go to fight spare them from having to go themselves while also having the country be protected. Many people would be willing to risk it for huge bags of money and everyone would do exactly what they chose.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 05:59 AM
4

The answer is no draft and just keep increasing the pay until people join willingly (without ruining other aspects of the economy so as to essentially give people no real choice).
/r/MensRights01/06/26 07:05 AM
1

What about a man that fucks around (or would fuck around if he could), but only when single, and is extremely loyal when commited and sees sex differently in that context?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 04:03 AM
3

You're right, we have a lot to do so that the common man can be treated equally to the common woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 01:09 PM
14

It's not concern for boys; it's concern that girls will be affected by boys not seeking said girls or something similar. Women want to keep their power and they largely use sexuality to get it.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 04:36 AM
5

The feminist cancer has been growing for a long time, I see.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 09:30 PM

Women nowadays are too spoiled to even consider what you're saying. They've been conditioned to think that they truly deserve everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 10:46 AM
10

Little kids are very impressionable, so movies like Barbie being considered to be very obviously propaganda to a non-indoctrinated adult isn't good enough in my opinion. I think we should consider it a threat to mens' rights. I think a good strategy for any propaganda is to not talk about it at all so as to not advertise it, and then if it is encountered anyway, to point out its inaccuracies. I mean this mostly for kids because adults with that mindset would likely just be hostile.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 09:48 AM
2

No problem. :)
/r/MensRights22/05/26 03:21 AM
2

The word you presumably wanted to use is "cues," not "queues." (I'm saying this for learning purposes, not to insult you.)
/r/MensRights22/05/26 03:19 AM
1

I understand that it's probably too much effort, but I'd be interesting in reading the results of you experimenting with various different women by wearing something that makes you look low status, not paying for her stuff like food (assuming she has a job and isn't a tradwife type of person) and then trying to make a romantic move (not necessarily sexual).
/r/MensRights22/05/26 03:16 AM
0

As someone who feels very similarly, I don't know if stopping to hate women can be fully done, but it would probably help to avoid all interactions with them and just focus on money, material things, friends (that are presumably guys) and family. And, I guess you can look at womens' (probably half-naked) bodies on the streets for some entertainment.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 03:08 AM
29

HR's job is to protect the company, not employees. Wouldn't it be better to contact a lawyer? I understand the instinct to avoid that because of cost, but still. There are possibly also some free legal consultation services from law students, etc., in one's area.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 02:57 AM
11

Women not finding any man that meets their needs is like employers complaining that nobody wants to work. That is, they're ignoring a bunch of individuals because of their unreasonable, hyper-inflated standards.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 06:48 AM
2

I meant it as (perhaps a rudimentary version of the) reasoning that, for example, a lawyer could argue in court that this nonsense shouldn't be a thing.
/r/MensRights17/05/26 07:13 AM
2

Even if it is just for the alleged father, so what? One person's rights shouldn't override another's especially when the truth is on their side.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 09:47 PM
1

I need an explanation because it seems like something that's not obvious to me is obvious to you. To try to understand what you're saying, are you saying I should keep a sexual vibe and not let it get overly friendly?
/r/MensRights14/05/26 04:23 AM
9

Things like this make me think it would probably be nice if we could have a man-only society where women are allowed to visit, but not stay.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 06:35 AM
1

Well, if we both can't host then we could still hang out until the opportunity to fuck unexpectedly presents itself and do so in those specific moments. I don't know if you took that in a different way.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 06:30 AM
1

I try, lol. It never works. It always leads to them asking me why I can't host or them not even asking and just ghosting or something (or them also not being able to). (Especially if it's not just a hookup, I'm fine with just hanging out and not having sex (if we can't find a way to do so), but that's not good enough for them either, it seems.)
/r/MensRights09/05/26 11:39 AM
2

I'm kind of an open book with everyone, but specifically about the money and housing, it's because I have no choice: women almost always want to meet at the guy's place and I have no place to which they can go.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 09:54 AM
2

I share your point of view, but what can I say? "Meet meet in this alley"? Edit: That's for getting laid. For all other cases and also for before attempted hookups, I tend to suggest just spending time together outside.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 09:52 AM
1

That's more or less my issue. I lose women in private messages once they figure out I don't have my own place or much money. It happens so consistently that I now just hate almost all women.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:02 AM

TL;DR Society only cares because they're scared that men will do something about their situation that could affect women negatively in one way or another. Otherwise, if the undesired men just rot quietly, then "everything is okay."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 11:18 PM
10

That's because men are competing with each other (because they feel they have to do so) instead of working together. If we worked together, like wingman-ing one another to get laid in turns (for example), then we could bring down simping to a minimum.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 04:48 AM
3

I would say idolizing any pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 03:07 AM

You can't get rid of that competition. If 7' is the average height, women will want 8' tall men "to feel safe." There's no winning unless you're above average, based on what the latest average is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 09:18 AM
2

The woman can communicate her feelings to the man to explain things instead of everyone trying to guess what the exhibited actions mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 04:41 AM
11

In my opinion, abortions should only be allowed for those life-and-death circumstances, but not otherwise. For me, it's about the baby; it has nothing to do with exacting revenge.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 06:50 AM
0

It seems to contradict what the parents -- especially the mother -- are saying, though. It seems like there's mixed messaging.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 10:51 AM
0

I especially agree with your last sentence as of the comma.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 01:00 PM
7

Why are the men doing all the giving (in terms of both effort and money)? Women act like them just showing up is a gift to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 04:32 AM
3

I suspect one big reason is if they're financially stuck in life since they don't have the same support system(s) that women have.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:18 AM
2

Oof. Having to write something like that must have really sucked (at least for me).
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:16 AM
1

Tell your sister how you feel by presenting it as you feeling sad rather than angry about being treated like that. In other words, talk to her using liberal lingo. She may be able to help you be treated right. If she also rejects you, then you probably need a new social group. (The first step is the hardest, and it should get easier after that.)
/r/MensRights08/03/26 07:35 AM
2

IT as in Information Technology?
/r/MensRights08/03/26 06:46 AM
21

Yes, and it's a form of gaslighting too (because they tell you that women replacing men isn't what it means and that it's instead about having a good future for women without it being bad for men or something like that).
/r/MensRights08/03/26 06:24 AM

More like stop teaching girls they're amazing and can do no wrong. Also, stop favouring them unfairly by giving them access to things like scholarships that guys wouldn't get.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 10:57 AM

Why should you be the one paying for her and not the other way around (if one has to pay for the other)?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 10:54 AM
1

A positive spin on this is that the status quo can be changed more because there is more room for change since there are greater numbers of men that weren't voting before that can start voting now.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 05:21 PM
6

They don't want to be cancelled. People need to say that in unison, not individually.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 02:07 PM
14

Why the bitter aftertaste? It sounds like the feminist propaganda got to you. To be fair, you've probably been exposed to it from the moment you were born, loosely speaking.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 09:04 AM
3

I don't live there, but that country seems like a feminist's utopia. I'm guessing many guys want to leave but for various reasons can't?
/r/MensRights02/03/26 08:56 AM
1

But, how, in practice?
/r/MensRights25/02/26 02:46 AM
1

I think and hope this will backfire. In any case, we should help fellow guys (such as younger ones, in this case) see this gaslighting for what it is. It might save them a few years of being lost and confused.
/r/MensRights23/02/26 10:42 AM
1

I'm sorry. One strategy could be to find out if she accuses someone else and support him, which would also end up helping you get justice too.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 02:24 AM
1

Did you try to do this all on your own without asking for help?
/r/MensRights01/02/26 06:06 AM
1

Men (who would be naturally or passionately included for it) should become lawyers and judges as a way to fight for men's rights (and get paid handsomely while they're at it).
/r/MensRights01/02/26 05:00 AM
4

If there's an election of some kind, vote on your way out (to help out the men that will remain there).
/r/MensRights29/01/26 06:18 AM
1

You seem to have been conditioned to see "conservative" as a bad word (probably in large part because of American politics). Other than that, I agree with the sentiment except that I think it just feels that way because that's the male experience with dating. Not that all liberal policies are bad in my opinion.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 03:32 AM
2

Non-meat animal-based products like milk or cheese should fill you up too. If you don't eat meat, you should probably eat things like nuts to be healthy. Consult a doctor or at least do your own research before potentially depriving yourself of necessary nutrients. If I'm saying things you already know, sorry for wasting your time; I'm just trying to be helpful in helping you achieve your "mission." Even though I'm not a vegetarian or vegan, I kind of like the idea of less animals dying, hence w…
/r/MensRights08/01/26 03:10 PM
1

Having discrimination related to being white and pointing it out does not negate discrimination related to being a man (nor does it negate any other discrimination others may face).
/r/MensRights24/12/25 12:25 PM
26

They should ban conscription for both men and women and just raise the wages of the soldiers until they get enough people.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 10:41 AM
2

I don't live in the US, but I'm sorry for what you people are going through with the ICE stuff (which is unacceptable). Having said that, I have my own share of problems, but I don't want to doxx myself. One thing to note, though, is that by making things confrontational with things like DEI, you give rise to Trumpism. If people want equality like they claim, they need to have equality, not "reparations for the past" or anything like that, which is yet another inequality and catalyst of perpetua…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 11:23 AM
4

From my perspective as a poor white man, I have all the disadvantages: everyone assuming I have it better and trying to make things "equal" by giving me even more disadvantages.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 07:01 AM
2

Your "minimum level of respect that everyone is owed" is his "basic human dignity."
/r/MensRights14/12/25 09:49 AM
4

Might this backfire and just make them hate feminists even more (but perhaps with a delay as it takes time for one to realize that they've been lied to)? (However, I think we should help fellow guys see the lies earlier on, so as to not have them waste years of their lives trying to conform and wonder why it's not working out.)
/r/MensRights14/12/25 05:16 AM
5

Yes, but we need to keep pushing or things won't get better for us.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 08:16 AM
6

Guys also lie to them too.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 07:53 AM
3

Thanks for the kind words.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 08:52 AM
3

I didn't read all that, but you matter. Don't kill yourself. Find people who care about you.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 04:46 AM
2

And, those should be available to men too. Otherwise, it'd again be a matter of men risking their lives and women not doing the same.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 03:34 PM
1

I think we're miscommunicating; that was Different-Product-91.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 03:31 PM
2

Well, if they're that desperate, losing more than half their population would be a hard sell.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 09:53 AM
13

I didn't read anything in detail, but this could be a good thing. If women complain, maybe men might get out of conscription too.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 08:59 AM
1

It is a choice; you don't see any other option as viable because your family matters more to you than other things, but it's still a choice.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 05:49 AM
63

You won the metaphorical lottery (no pun intended). :)
/r/MensRights14/11/25 07:13 AM
20

How else would they get superiority?
/r/MensRights14/11/25 03:56 AM
2

I don't see a protest happening during the relative calm of a non-war, though.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 03:28 AM
1

No disrespect intended, but that sounds like a choice you (would) have made, and not an imposition on you.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 03:27 AM
1

I am very much willing to do something even without being asked, just not going to fight on the front lines. I would probably try to build weapons for my country's military while simultaneously trying to reach the other side's soldiers with words (probably through the Internet) so as to avoid killing altogether, but that's easier said than done and possibly unrealistic given constraints like geographical ones which make it hard to escape a military if you're on the aggressor's side (like Russia …
/r/MensRights14/11/25 03:21 AM
2

I think men do that because they feel that when women complain, people listen, whereas when men complain, they're just seen as a violent threat to deal with.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 03:09 AM
2

It's because they feel alone and unsupported. That's why I think it's very important that we support fellow men doing things like that. I'd argue that that's even more important than taking a stand oneself, but I guess that's debatable.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 03:07 AM
2

Actually, I understood your point and agree with it. My comment was a tangent.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 03:05 AM
17

Men that are conscripted should just refuse to fight and if there are huge numbers of men imprisoned at once for that, then maybe that could get women to care (because it would be people they care about, such as their sons) and therefore changed to be had. Edit: For that to work, though, the country would need to win the war. It's best to just flee the country.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:10 AM
6

I wouldn't call that sort of thing "progress."
/r/MensRights11/11/25 05:10 AM
8

Honestly, I think they actually just believe that they're oppressed (but I can't say for sure). After all, that's the messaging they got bombarded with as they grew up.
/r/MensRights09/11/25 02:14 PM
0

The only way I'd be okay with taking on any financial responsibilities would be if she's a tradwife.
/r/MensRights09/11/25 01:47 PM
3

For what it's worth, I understand being lazy in a general situation (such as reading this here), but if you're ever in a position to help mens' rights even a little, you should fight your laziness in that situation (since your effort(s) would actually get something done, no matter how small, and it all adds up). ;P
/r/MensRights03/11/25 07:50 AM
1

This, please. :)
/r/MensRights03/11/25 07:47 AM
5

And/or support those that do (by doing things such as testifying, donating and/or spreading the word).
/r/MensRights03/11/25 07:45 AM
2

For what it's worth, I think that was a very good post, tristanthompsonbeast.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 07:41 AM
1

For what it's worth, I think both parents were good in Young Sheldon.
/r/MensRights02/11/25 03:21 AM
1

The first enables the second.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 02:18 AM
1

Well, what you (and I) (presumably) want is for her to show she cares. That doesn't need to come in the form of flowers (or even anything that costs money). (I guess my first comment was a partial joke and it wasn't exactly the point of the title and video.)
/r/MensRights19/10/25 09:25 PM
1

What happens if one does that and gets caught?
/r/MensRights18/10/25 05:29 AM
1

What happens if one does that and gets caught?
/r/MensRights18/10/25 05:28 AM
11

To be fair, I don't really want flowers.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 05:27 AM
3

To all that are reading (not just OP), just support your fellow men and don't treat one another as competition. Unless a particular woman seems ethical, prioritize men over women (otherwise, provide equal treatment).
/r/MensRights12/10/25 04:55 AM
10

Agreed. The only help people should generally get is free good-enough education, housing, healthy food in sufficient quantities and medical help, and then when they succeed, they can get better versions of those things with their own money. Fuck DEI. DEI "helps" non-white men succeed at a point in time where they've already broken free of any struggles like poverty. That is, it's helping them once they no longer need the help that they may have in fact needed earlier on. Another flaw with DEI is…
/r/MensRights24/09/25 02:03 AM
3

How does that "get-a-divorce" woman even find anyone to date to begin with (presumably for a real relationship)?
/r/MensRights17/09/25 08:38 AM
3

We want to hear them roar.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 11:52 AM
2

Whenever something like this happens, we need to support each other and not be isolated. Us being isolated is why women win in these situations. If you (whoever is reading this) don't want to stand up against this for yourself, then perhaps it'd be easier to stand up for someone else that's standing up to stuff like this? That way, you're already a group of two, and it may add up from there.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 08:43 AM
3

It's worth asking the school if someone else (like another teacher teaching the same course) can grade your work.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 05:45 AM
1

You can wait until you get your entire degree. That's the strategic timing.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 05:43 AM
1

You can wait until you get your entire degree. That's the strategic timing.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 05:43 AM
1

You can wait until you get your entire degree. That's the strategic timing.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 05:42 AM
-2

I recommend you praise a woman in a way that doesn't go against your beliefs (such as praising your mom) in order to not lose participation points.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 04:45 AM
6

Now I see why the older generations of men were how they were with women. I imagine there were also other reasons like paternity testing not being a thing. I imagine things cycling back and forth, like eventually men as a group will revolt when it goes too far even for the feminist ones, and then men from the distant future will be like "Why are we treating women like this? We should treat them better." and then they will and then women will again treat men poorly shortly after that and then ano…
/r/MensRights01/09/25 08:31 AM
1

That's fucked up.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:23 AM
3

No. Women have been raised to think they're special and deserve the world for a while now.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:16 AM
2

I cannot imagine having a kid and not getting a paternity test ... even if I trust the woman (because you never know)!
/r/MensRights26/08/25 07:44 AM
1

For what it's worth, I didn't find the movie Wonder Woman 1984 to be man-hating (and I like it a lot).
/r/MensRights26/08/25 07:43 AM
2

Really? There are other apps where men pay to talk and women get paid to do the same?
/r/MensRights18/08/25 07:26 AM
7

They shouldn't be aborting anyway (unless it's medically necessary to save their life).
/r/MensRights16/08/25 10:29 AM
19

I tend to ask women who say that why the movement can't be called egalitarianism instead. I don't recall ever getting a proper answer.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 03:02 AM
3

If your intentions are in fact good, then thanks for caring (but I can't just trust that that is the case, and I also have other issues with stuff like OnlyFans anyway).
/r/MensRights31/07/25 05:23 AM
-2

But, men probably release more gas and eat more. ;P
/r/MensRights31/07/25 05:07 AM
1

In my opinion, yes, and I think (paid) sex work should just be for disabled people, old people, hideous people and people who have a party mindset (or something similar). Otherwise, it makes women see men as a means for money. Also, in my opinion, online stuff is quite unremarkable even if free, so I don't get why people even feel tempted to pay for that, but I can understand for prostitution. Personally, for what it's worth, I can't get laid or find love and struggle to even smile at a woman or…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 05:04 AM
2

Oh my God! I didn't know she was also married! It does track with my view of women, though ... at least the local ones.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 08:59 PM
5

Would you also lust after a rich ugly man or just have sex with him and take care of the kids, etc.? I'm curious how women are wired in this regard. Also, same question but this time with love, not lust. (I'm not talking about myself here, for what it's worth.)
/r/MensRights29/07/25 08:51 PM
1

In a time of war, I think they should make it mandatory for everyone (women included) to help (like to build weapons, traps for enemy tanks, etc.), but not necessarily as a combatant. Would that not solve all the issues?
/r/MensRights26/07/25 06:39 AM
35

Will it also let men request to avoid being paired with women?
/r/MensRights24/07/25 04:39 AM
10

I think it will make women want marriage less, but it's still a step in the right direction, just like a minimum wage requirement generally makes employers hire less, but it's important to set a minimum standard.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 07:30 AM
3

"Things like only fans is actually mens sexuality being exploited and preyed upon for money." Exactly! Men are the prey here, not the predators!
/r/MensRights19/07/25 07:41 AM
4

That mindset harms good women too. In theory, I think it'd be better to frame it as helping individuals rather than a gender. It's the gender mindset that leads to men being disadvantaged. I'm not exactly sure how to do this in practice.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 01:43 AM
1

It's both. It's a zero-sum game. If women thrive financially, it's at men's expense, both financially and socially (because of being overlooked due to hypergamy).
/r/MensRights22/06/25 09:23 PM
1

For that to happen, they'd first need to deplete men's resources.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 09:21 PM
3

Isn't that a plus for women? They want you to spend it on them, after all.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 12:27 PM
1

Love (which I do not mean as a euphemism for sex).
/r/MensRights12/06/25 09:45 AM
1

One party is likely at least a little less bad than the others, so whether it's for mens' rights and/or other reasons, you really should vote. Also, women vote more than men, so there is a gap to close that could lead to a significant improvement in mens' lives.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 08:20 PM
2

Please keep voting by mail for your own country (Australia) even if you're not there (to help protect the other men there as much as possible). I think men should recommend "escape and vote from afar" as a modern strategy to deal with feminism in both the short- and long-term.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 11:51 AM
2

There should at least be a not-too-small fine, then (if not a more serious punishment).
/r/MensRights01/06/25 11:23 AM
9

You Americans need a sane, compassionate (in a non-woke sense) conservative leader (so, not Trump and not a Democrat).
/r/MensRights31/05/25 08:27 AM
3

I hadn't watched the included video. Having watched it, I'm inclined to agree with you. I still think there should be a fair trial, no matter how obvious something may seem at least at first glance. The trial should probably happen after he's no longer president, otherwise he (the potential victim) could probably just veto it (but I'm not too sure about the legalities of the situation).
/r/MensRights31/05/25 08:06 AM
-44

I agree that there's a double standard, but technically, isn't there some doubt as to whether or not it was the malicious act that many people think it is?
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:46 PM
2

Oof. I'm kind of exhausted as I write this, so I might not express myself very well, but love and respect along with stating problems as soon as possible, but not at the wrong time. So, like if you're upset about something, mention it as soon as possible, but not when he's about to leave to go to work or if he's tired. Think of the two of you as being on the same team solving problems you have in common and not as adversaries in a tug of war. In case the quality of my answers isn't good right no…
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:35 PM
2

Also, you're welcome, and it's okay, I was just a little confused because the problem seemed too simple to solve, lol.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:28 PM
2

If I understand your question correctly, I don't think that a man who wants you to take his last name would be bothered by your specifying that your maiden name is what it is in parentheses (because that is just a matter of pragmatism, not disrespect or anything like that).
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:24 PM
2

But, it would only be for your work, which is what you're concerned about. You wouldn't have that problem in other aspects of life. Plus, people would refer to you without your maiden name if you put your maiden name in parentheses instead of adding it via hyphenation; it would literally just help with consolidating your reputation and marriage (in people's minds and in search engines).
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:18 PM
2

Can't you just put your maiden name in parentheses on reports (and state that it's your maiden name)?
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:05 PM
5

So, we should also use non-standard platforms and browsers like Tor Browser to access "Onion" web sites that can't be taken down, and also spread the word about those things using word of mouth in real life as well. I'm not proposing avoiding mainstream content and going into weird "corners", but rather having more content. Avoiding mainstream content can cause other kinds of problems.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 07:32 AM
1

Why the downvote?
/r/MensRights27/05/25 07:14 AM
43

Men need to work together more and not just "go their own way". I know that saying applies to men going their own way, away from women, but men tend to be lone wolfs in general a lot of the time, so it's important that we at least work together to protect our rights.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 07:13 AM
71

If that's what you're seeing, maybe it's an algorithm feeding you what you've been looking at, which may not be those things (anymore) or just downright censorship.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 07:09 AM
2

Please keep voting by mail for your own country even if you're not there (to help protect the other men there as much as possible).
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:58 AM
1

He's not trying to trap someone; he's trying to not be ruined by someone. It's a self-defence thing.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:52 AM
7

Oh, my God! She really needs to be fired!
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:39 AM
2

I'm trying to formulate an actionable plan for us to be able to collectively follow. What you're saying sounds too much like giving up, unless you have an actionable plan for changing this system. Plus, has what I suggested even been tried? If not, it's worth trying before moving on to more extreme methods. (I don't mean that in a violent way.)
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:31 AM
12

Guys should not spend any money on women. Women will, of course, resist this, so if anyone reading this feels like they can't stick to the principle, at least try hard to find the woman who will be the cheapest (assuming your relationship is not based on love). That should drive the price of pussy down and reduce womens' power too.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 03:36 AM
1

I'm pretty sure it's sarcasm, based at least on the way he spelled the word "awesome".
/r/MensRights24/05/25 03:31 AM
7

Part of the problem is that there are more men who care about womens' rights than there are women who care about mens' ... or at least it feels like it from my lived experience. Men, support other men, even if it's against other men.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 03:28 AM
9

Some guys should at least read about those things because we need to defend ourselves. Women are literally getting degrees on topics specifically regarding furthering their advantages over men.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 03:17 AM
8

Maybe you're not the right person to ask, in which case, this is an open question for everyone, but what can we do to make women face the same accountability for their actions as men? One idea I can think of is to have formal research that shows statistics. This would probably be best done outside of school, though, otherwise your grades would be affected by a feminist system. Perhaps this should be done by someone who is knowledgeable enough and retired and has nothing to lose reputationally, p…
/r/MensRights24/05/25 03:12 AM
3

When I read the title, I thought it was meant figuratively ... until I read some of the text.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 03:01 AM
5

Don't just speak up. Team up and speak up together.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 08:24 AM
2

Porn warps womens' views of men too.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 05:20 AM
2

Oh, I didn't think of that, and I'm not sure. I wonder if there's any problem if you never use the recorded content (except for a court case).
/r/MensRights23/04/25 03:36 PM
1

Carry an audio recorder and always have it recording. Don't tell anyone unless there's a court case.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 08:38 PM
1

"progressive"
/r/MensRights20/04/25 08:34 PM
1

This message will probably only appeal to the people it was not intended for.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 10:47 AM
11

Well, in the cases where you have a strong man that just happens to "wear his heart on his sleeve," just think about the fact that when things matter, he's dependable / strong, possibly (but not necessarily) even stronger than the ones that always seem strong. I doubt that feeling you have would translate to your boys / male children, though, even if you can't overcome it for men in general (because, if I'm right, that's a sexual selection thing, and you presumably wouldn't see your boys / male …
/r/MensRights13/04/25 05:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter