TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

original_sh4rpie Archive

View 0 posts and 9 comments by original_sh4rpie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Are you really pro-man if you hate on that bussy?
/r/MensRights13/06/22 05:34 PM
1

If the burden of proof is on me for posting a response to the OP, then transitively the burden of proof is also on you for posting a response to my response. Syllogism error. And you're arguing they are not. But you've provided no evidence to back that assertion up. Asked and answered. You are either willfully looking past my statements or do not understand them. I am making not assertion. I have shown deficiencies in your data, logic, and conclusions. If it's rained 3 days in a row, without goo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 09:40 PM
1

True, but you haven't shown that the same holds true for OLD stats. That it does not represent the average chick looking for a relationship. I don't have the burden of proof, you do. You are arguing that your stats apply to general population when the surveyed population is not representative of the general population due to a niche behavior. Saying I have to prove a negative is not how debate or logic works at all. Burden of Proof From X, which is the assertion, is not yet disproved. Therefore,…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 08:20 PM
1

I have shown why. You seemingly are either too dense to understand or simply have no common working knowledge of representative statistics. If I were to survey current inmates at the county jail and determined that 50% of them have engaged in domestic abuse, would I be justified in saying 50% of the general population of the entire county engages in domestic abuse? Of course I can't. Why not? Because the surveyed population is not representative of the population I am extrapolating that behavior…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 07:22 PM
1

Did you not read my evidence? More than 75% of women have never used any dating apps, which is the primary source for your thesis. When your entire argument boils down to statistics, we are very much in the realm of proper surveying and mathematics. It is not a random selection of the population. It is a niche community. You cannot with any sort of logical consistency extrapolate data from a niche community to a general one. To take it a step further, 48% of dating app users are 29 or younger (h…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 06:51 PM
1

You haven't proven that it doesn't affect the gen pop Haha, that's not at all how statistics or hypotheses work. Holy shit, that's funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 06:09 PM
1

It does not. It proves that a very select minority of individuals shows evidence of 80/20. Not that gen pop. There was no random selection. It's very, very, bad statistics that does not reflect the greater community.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 03:48 PM
1

You don't think the Venn diagram of dating apps and speed dating isn't almost the exact same? The fact is most people don't use these services. Only a small percentage of the overall population. It's highly suspect to draw general population conclusions from that set of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 02:07 PM
1

Call it whatever you want, but the reality is women only find a small % of men attractive. You need to clarify that at best, this statement is only true of women who use dating apps. The vast majority or women (and people in general) do not use such things. Most of this data is so bias due to the population source. https://www.statista.com/statistics/310335/us-online-dating-app-site-usage-gender/
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 06:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter