TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

oscarasimov Archive

View 0 posts and 93 comments by oscarasimov on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Yup! they say it right in the article This comes after research released last July by the same researchers found most women who freeze their eggs are doing so because they cannot find a similarly successful man.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 01:10 AM
6

Any one else realizing women are not as important as they pretend to be? Sounds like you made it. Welcome to the club
/r/askTRP22/06/18 11:50 PM
4

100%. Op listen to this advice. I was in a similar position to you. Then I started doing jiu jitsu, and now 3x a week, I have big ass dudes literally trying to choke me out or break my arms. Now the idea of a physical confrontation feels, for lack of a better word, normal.
/r/askTRP10/06/18 09:21 PM
15

Why are you judging ops post by his post history?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:57 PM
3

What is your point?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:57 PM
1

100 percent keep them in. I saved it precisely so I could link that to people who think genital mutilation is a female thing.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:07 PM
1

holy fuck that gif. I'm done.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 01:40 AM
9

what state?
/r/MensRights08/02/18 12:27 AM
1

I'm really disappointed you've given up. We got so far and then just at the point where I've met your demands for proof, you've dissapeared. I've never claimed that women don't have it worse, as you said. I did claim that there I haven't seen evidence that such is the case. If you're so certain of your position, and so insulted by this sub, then why won't you present evidence to prove your point? Thus far, I've simply asked questions about why you believe the things you do. I've in no way acted …
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:46 AM
1

The issue isnt nessecarily that women are paid less for the same amount of work, its that gender roles push them to into positions where they make less. But wait holy shit, this is what the first article I sent you explained! Actually the study says the pay gap is a function of choices women make. :)
/r/MensRights30/01/18 03:02 AM
1

mean I read the article you posted and it was a garbage piece where everything they cited was either a dead link or opinion. I also looked up academic reviews of her book and the consensus was that its garbage except for a few misogynist losers who rally around it. I get the feeling you think anyone who disagress with you is a "misogynist loser" which is both cute and predictable :) In any event, here is a link to the study. I'll be really interested to see what your adorable little head does to…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:34 AM
1

I could see how you dont think women are subject to gender roles and systemic sexism. I never claimed women weren't the victims of sexism nor do I believe that to be the case. I do claim that there is no evidence that shows that women's lives today are worse than mens. Plus the author wrote a book called A War on Boys, I'm sure she doesn't have an agenda. Do you make up your mind about all things before you actually learn about them? I find it surprising you haven't seen this before. You really …
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:42 AM
0

You realize most of these women were abused years ago right? So now you don’t think this is current evidence that shows women’s lives are worse? Both genders and all races have been oppressed at one time or another. So then how are determining that women had it worse than men historically? And how are you determining that women have it worse than men today?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 10:46 PM
1

In today's culture you want more oppression? Do you not find the entire me too movement a counter backlash at the perceived systematic oppression when it comes to reporting sexual abuse? I mean its pretty clear cut there is heavy systematic abuse and oppression happening in Hollywood, multiple government workers have resigned from allegations, but none of that is real right? I'm not sure I follow you here. If people are being forced to resign and are blackballed from the entire industry they wor…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 05:41 AM
1

I gave you Are you aware I'm new to this comment chain? pretend like the credit equal act was only passed for political points when you have no evidence of that being the case. On the contrary, it's you who failed to provide evidence to support your claim. The other person demonstrated that just because a bill is passed, it doesn't necessarily indicate that a bill needed to be passed. Now if you want to actually try and refute my examples go ahead My original question was simply asking for two t…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:38 AM
1

If you've reduced someone to the point that the only thing they have left to say is insults, you can be sure it's because they have nothing intelligent left to say. It makes me happy to see reach so low for a group of people you apparently think so little of.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:56 AM
1

They say the purpose of debate isn't to convince your opponent but to convince the audience. You should consider your audience when you participate in these discussions since right now you're completely failing to provide an intelligent response and your border lining on just being insulting. If that's not something you're capable of doing, then maybe you just shouldn't comment to begin with..
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:36 AM
1

Also why did you ignore the rest of my comment? Why are you asking me to defend a claim I didn't make? Do you have evidence of that? Here you are :)
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:20 AM
2

One of the first claims your article makes aims to perpetuate the pay gap myth. Do you realize this has been debunked?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:47 AM
3

I am going by percentages. The percentage of men who are victims sexual assault vs the percentage of women who are victims of sexual assault. Men are victimized at higher rates.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:43 AM
2

To be clear, you can’t provide evidence that women’s lives in the us are currently worse?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:41 AM
2

Nothing you’re saying is a relevant objection to the claim that men are significantly more likely to be the victim of sexual violence. Would you like to offer another way to show that women’s lives are currently worse than men’s?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:28 AM
4

To be clear, you can’t provide evidence that women’s lives in the us are currently worse?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:19 AM
4

How were they used as property? And more importantly, in what way are their lives currently worse?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 12:00 AM
4

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=131113&page=1 Yea. 200k men each year. Even if women in prison were raped at similar rates, they still wouldn’t come close to the number of total male victims of sexual violence.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:58 PM
2

But what your describing isn't a gender issue. Men and women have BOTH been discouraged from coming out after being sexually victimized. Also, if anything, men are victimized at SIGNIFICANTLY higher rates than women if you include prisoners. So there is no good reason, past or present to cite sexual assault as an issue for women.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 09:59 PM
10

My last response to you. I've been nothing but polite to you so I'm not sure why you're leaving so soon but I suspect it's because you don't feel your position is legitimately defendable. Women make less than men This has been debunked by feminist organizations. women are way more likely to be victims of sexual assault, harassment, and misconduct This is also not true. If you include prison rape, men are the victims of sexual violence by a LARGE margin women have to fight tooth and nail to recei…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:31 PM
9

I'm not saying sexual harassment has ceased to exist, I'm asking how you believe women lives are objectively worse in todays world. Are you saying that because women are the victims of sexual assault, this proves gender based discrimination?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:09 PM
12

In years past, people would not have cared or lost their jobs. Ok so then what is a CURRENT example in which women's lives are objectively worse?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:03 PM
13

Please explain your point precisely because I'm confused. The fact that these are scandals, where people are losing there jobs and blackballed from the entire industry seems to indicate that our society takes the victimization of women EXTREMELY seriously.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:57 PM
-7

Yup, it takes most people ~10 seconds to post a comment. So your point is...?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:42 PM
14

Ok, and the second half of that question is what ways are they currently worse?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:38 PM
6

It's an enormous false equivalency to compare Trump and Clinton. I'm not a Clinton supporter, but I voted for her only because she knows how to read and doesn't have donkey brains. What exactly is the false equivalency? Both candidates have very bad qualities about them. It's a pretty modest position to say that if it's okay to look past one candidates terrible features, it should be okay to look past BOTH. You made my point. Just because women have it better in western society doesn't mean they…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:38 PM
3

I asked a pretty simple question that you answered with another question. If you think people aren't understanding you, speak more clearly.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:35 PM
9

Trump wouldn't have been elected This is a pretty weak argument. Presumably you voted for Hilary Clinton. It's really quite easy to cite examples of chicken hawk behavior on her part, where she supported coups in honduras and helped overthrow democratically elected governments. Surely you'd agree that it would be absurd for me to claim since she was the democratic nominee, that the democratic party is made up of heartless bastards with no respect for the sovereignty other countries. The fact is …
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:24 PM
15

He shouldn't have to tell you women historically have been oppressed. If you've read any form of history youd know men were the ones in positions of power. Defining terms and precisely establishing your argument is a critical and non negotiable element of any sincere debate. If you're not here for a sincere debate, then I can only assume you're here to be an asshole. Very quick example the women's right to vote. Right, so that's your example of historical oppression. What is a current example of…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:14 PM
10

I want to make sure I understand your point here. Do you think that if someone makes an illogical argument, that it shouldn't be pointed out? I'm getting the feeling you make a lot of bad arguments, and when people point that out to you, instead of trying to improve your argument, you just say the problem is everyone else.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 07:06 PM
14

If you can't be bothered to present your idea, why did you bother to respond at all? It sounds like you're angry and insulted by the very notion of having your position questioned.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:52 PM
7

If demonstrating that someones argument is logically flawed is NOT debating, then exactly what do you believe constitutes a proper debate? Do you think it's too reasoned? Are there not enough insults? Should there be more feels?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:50 PM
14

I mean, you took the time to come here and do no more than just insult people. I think you're projecting your misery...
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:47 PM
13

What is your point? That our president is an asshole? We can sit here all day going tit for tat citing exampling of people being assholes to men or women.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:45 PM
28

In what way do you think women's lives have been objectively worse and in what ways are they currently worse?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:43 PM
10

Ironically, saying The classic "facts are facts" argument, Is a defacto accusation of a 'logical fallacy'. You're attacking the form of argument and concluding that because the arguement is of a particular form, it is necessarily weak. Nice try tho!
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:34 PM
2

There should be a bot that posts this link everytime someone claims “those aren’t real feminists!!” https://np.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/68v91b/woman_who_lied_about_being_sexually_assaulted/dh23pwo/
/r/MensRights04/11/17 02:17 PM
1

Oh don't go now! I want to see you make a fool of yourself more. You're so much fun powerboy!
/r/MensRights17/12/16 02:12 AM
1

LOL omg the self ownage here is amazing! This is a question of the word "ban" and how it can and can't be used. NOT when a ban is and isn't outrageous. If you'd like to argue that people aren't or shouldn't be outraged that a movie was banned from one theater, go ahead. But that's a separate conversation. As is one about the authority of individual mcdonalds over others. How old are you, powerboy? Are you even allowed up this late?
/r/MensRights17/12/16 01:54 AM
1

not all schools are public ding dong neither is mcdonalds youre batting a thousand, arent cha?
/r/MensRights17/12/16 01:28 AM
1

I can expand the quote in the official capacity if you need me too You mean you can expand the quote in a relevant way instead of a misleading one? Well look at that, HE CAN BE TAUGHT! Don't use the word ban when the movie clearly wasn't banned. The owner chose not to show it. The owner said he wasn't going to play that movie at his theater after he had already agreed to, how is 'ban' NOT a correct word to use? If a school district decides that a book can no longer be a part of the curriculum or…
/r/MensRights17/12/16 01:15 AM
1

Okay, we're going in circles now. Back to my previous comment, what you're saying is that this title is misleading because it should read: The Red pill, the movie banned (because of) Feminists... Is that what you're saying? Because it's fucking nonsense and not worthy of a conversation
/r/MensRights17/12/16 12:56 AM
1

Don't try and back pedal now with some cherry picked quote. Be an adult and include the part where you also said that a law needed to be passed for it to be a ban. Or wait let met guess, you're going to try and dig around in some shit hole like: "I qualified the statement with "indicates" and that leaves room for me to later attempt to undermine my own comment" Dude, stop talking shit.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 12:39 AM
3

You're a troll talking shit, why should I be civil? You're question is intellectually dishonest which is fundamentally uncivil so don't act like a pussy bitch because you got what you're giving. Your previous comment says that laws need to be passed in order to meet the qulifications of a ban. Since laws weren't passed, there can't have been a ban. That is your argument and my argument was a proof by contradiction. I gave you TWO fucking examples of things being banned where laws weren't passed.…
/r/MensRights17/12/16 12:24 AM
3

ugh you fucking dolt. Enough with this damn freshman philosophy try hard shit. So what you're saying is you believe it's impossible for a school to ban a certain book? Or that it's impossible for me to be banned from my local mcdonalds for abusing the free refills? Mcdonalds didn't pass any legislation, did they? I guess the ban is lifted! Woohooo powerboy20 used a google to internet and now he says its okay! My god, think before you talk, you fucking goober
/r/MensRights17/12/16 12:12 AM
7

This is a nonsense distinction. Using your logic, I could argue that nothing could ever be banned. Expect perhaps by a government. Huckleberry Finn banned in some weird backwoods school in north carolina? NOPE! That's another misleading title because that can't happen. The school administration, you know, the people who decide which books are part of the curriculum; They're precisely the ones that decided not to include it so how could that possibly be "banning" the book? Also, the kids can alwa…
/r/MensRights16/12/16 10:49 PM
8

You gotta be fucking kidding me with this troll shit. You mean to tell me this whole "misleading title" conversation is because you think: a. the title should actually read: ..the movie was (effectively) banned (because of) feminists.... and b. you think there's a meaningful distinction between "I won't play this movie in my theater" and "I've banned this movie in my theater"?? Come the fuck on, I mean seriously. And enough with this "I don't know any feminists like that.." trope. I don't know a…
/r/MensRights16/12/16 10:35 PM
11

..very different how?
/r/MensRights16/12/16 09:06 PM
6

Feminists arent banning the movie This is a lie.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 09:05 PM
7

This comment is an outright lie. Why is it being upvoted here?
/r/MensRights16/12/16 07:13 PM
9

You almost sounded like you were my boss for a second there :)
/r/askTRP07/03/16 06:07 AM
5

exactly. in the same way guys inappropriately show a girl loyalty because "hey, that's what I want in a mate", girls try to demonstrate what they want in a mate.
/r/askTRP26/02/16 04:56 PM
8

I'm seeing 3's, 5's and 6's here!?! Are you guys all in highschool or are you really that naive!? As far as I'm concerned, if a 7+ says fewer than 10, I consider her approximately a virgin.
/r/askTRP26/02/16 03:46 PM
1

Good point. I still think this is useful though. Perhaps it should serve as evidence that men and women operate in fundamentally different ways and we should take that into account when evaluating so called "privilege"
/r/MensRights20/08/15 12:59 PM
1

What city are you in?
/r/askTRP17/05/15 09:54 PM
2

Well that's fucking dynamite. Thanks!
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:49 AM
1

I know a lot of people here make big deals about not paying for dinner. I'm kind of in between. I would take her to a taco truck and spend 10 bucks, and drink a 6 pack in the park. Then when you're arranging for the next date, tell her you want her to make you dinner.
/r/askTRP12/03/15 12:38 AM
8

Thats tough and it's hard to give advice with such little info. I will say this, next time a woman ignores you say: "Look at this fucking cunt pretending like she can't hear me?" Be sure to say it proud, indignant and with anger. If she was ignoring you before, she wont be anymore. Hold for a second, then hold for another second and then laugh and say you were just joking and act in a way that would make her look like she was overreacting if she got mad.
/r/askTRP23/02/15 04:29 PM
6

If this is happening with a lot of people then it is likely something you are doing. Serious question, what are you scared of more, being called an asshole or being called a pussy?
/r/askTRP23/02/15 04:12 PM
1

Exactly. One of the ways I look at is it that "negging" is just a buzz word that means "treating her like one of you best guy friends". Ya know how you call your friends out when they say something stupid. Or even sometimes you intentionally misunderstand them as a joke just so it makes what they just said look silly. Then you're just joking with them and it's not some PUA trick.
/r/askTRP20/01/15 10:52 PM
2

I get what you're saying but I always see these post's about dudes getting cheated on and there are all these red flags and the dude doesn't respond to them or where some girl is cheating on her guy for years and he has no clue. There's a certain point where you have to read the writing on the wall, ya know?
/r/askTRP18/01/15 07:08 PM
1

I don't just mean when you're out and someone chats them up. I mean in general. Ya know, like work friends or other guy friends stuff like that
/r/askTRP18/01/15 05:54 PM
5

It's more than that because this is about the actors and actresses playing the roles of characters in a story. old characters are played by old people. Young characters are played by young people. If the story has an older man dating a younger woman well then that's just what the story is and should be cast accordingly.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 12:14 AM
3

I don't understand what happened at all. You asked for a George foreman grill. She made a slavery joke. you didn't like it? Is that basically what happened?
/r/askTRP22/12/14 09:29 PM
6

You gotta lay some mean dick and they'll text
/r/askTRP20/12/14 10:18 PM
44

I know this is hard to hear right now. I'm sure you have so many things running through your mind about why your situation is somehow different and everyone here just doesn't know the details. A lot of us and maybe all of us have been cheated on at one time or another and felt something similar for a brief moment. But after a VERY short amount of time passes, we quickly realize that cutting contact was hands down the best option and anything less was only torturing ourselves. If I were you, I'd …
/r/askTRP12/12/14 09:48 PM
1

This might sound strange if you don't understand the context but in the past one of my go-to's in situations like this is a grab their dick and say something stupid in a high pitched voice like "Hey, whatcha got there? Is that for me?" It probably sounds crazy and that's because it's suppose to be. People like that are expecting one of two things. You to be a bitch or you to puff your chest and try to fight them. When you do something like this youre totally invading their personal space but you…
/r/askTRP12/12/14 01:25 AM
1

? Its like the second text she send on tinder. She's just trying to get to know me...
/r/askTRP09/12/14 03:14 AM
1

Yea, I definitely see that and I agree. But I'm not sure what to say. I don't want to take the question seriously but I don't want to look like a goofball, ya know?
/r/askTRP09/12/14 02:55 AM
1

I'm not sure I understand the question.
/r/askTRP09/12/14 02:44 AM
2

I'm a man and I get my ass grabbed a lot at bars. Sometimes girls will do it in a big group and then laugh about it. I still don't know why this kind of thing is socially acceptable
/r/MensRights14/10/12 02:44 PM
-1

This reminds me of when I went into this yoga studio to buy me and my girlfriend a month of yoga for her birthday and the lady at the counter told me I could buy my girlfriend a free pass but I wasn't allowed to buy one for myself because it was ladies only.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 02:24 PM
9

ive seen this before with my friends and noticed this in movies/television. Most times when a women cheats on a man, its because her bf/husband wasn't giving her enough attention or she felt neglected in some way and infidelity is just her natural response. When a man cheats on a women, its because he wants to have sex with as many people as possible and doesn't care about his partners feelings.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 05:28 PM
2

she called me a 14 year old and hung up.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:32 AM
2

r/videos banned me for calling this women and asking her for her side of the story. edit: i didnt post her info btw, just stated that i called her
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:35 PM
89

can we get a hold of the video poster?
/r/MensRights03/09/12 03:49 PM
27

so at the end of the day, what type of consequences could she face for something like this?
/r/MensRights03/09/12 03:40 PM
15

*sigh. reddit hispters...
/r/MensRights23/07/12 02:00 AM
2

huh i don't follow?
/r/MensRights23/07/12 01:05 AM
13

I guess this is what happens your country is already doing just about everything right but you still need something to bitch about.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 01:53 PM
0

Yes, not all instances where someone references their job are they an asshole. That being said, I stand by my original comment. Doctorstorm's "reference" felt awkward and extremely contrived.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 03:19 AM
1

but surely you don't think a student deserves respect equivalent to that owed a doctor? Well I doubt you're talking about respect in the general sense but in case you are, T-shirt or suite, doctor or janitor, I believe everyone deserves the same degree of respect until proven otherwise. But as for credibility, I believe that depends on the context. Should an M.D. be considered more of an authority on the subject of the housing market than a person who owns a real estate agency and getting their …
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:56 AM
-4

Then I check their comment history and smack myself on the forehead for quarreling with students lol so you're saying people gong to school are beneath you?
/r/MensRights29/04/12 05:34 PM
-2

You were suggesting a thought experiment not presenting data, you're "credentials" wont make the proposition any more or less interesting/thought provoking. Also, unless you have have a doctorate in the social sciences, you're "credentials" are irrelevant. edit: I thought you'd like this.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 04:33 PM
-4

Lol, so you're saying you are to this thread as a mechanic is to a car?
/r/MensRights29/04/12 03:50 PM
-4

Is doctor a nickname or are you actually that clumsy about wedging "i'm a doctor!" into the every conversation?
/r/MensRights29/04/12 03:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter