TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

oshout Archive

View 26 posts and 233 comments by oshout on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
77

oshout/r/MensRights27/03/16 02:42 AM
66

Marriage/Childrenoshout/r/MensRights07/06/19 12:02 AM
57

False Accusationoshout/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:14 PM
56

oshout/r/MensRights06/01/17 02:45 PM
49

Social Issuesoshout/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:18 PM
48

Legal Rightsoshout/r/MensRights23/11/18 05:56 PM
41

Fathers/Custodyoshout/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:36 AM
36

oshout/r/MensRights07/11/13 09:55 PM
31

Activism/Supportoshout/r/MensRights13/04/16 11:59 PM
31

oshout/r/MensRights24/01/16 12:17 AM
22

Generaloshout/r/MensRights25/09/15 08:32 PM
19

Generaloshout/r/MensRights20/05/16 12:14 AM
16

oshout/r/MensRights15/05/14 02:15 AM
15

Generaloshout/r/MensRights11/05/16 12:37 PM
14

Discriminationoshout/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:48 PM
14

Social Issuesoshout/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:34 PM
10

Discriminationoshout/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:53 PM
9

Feminismoshout/r/MensRights07/11/15 08:10 PM
7

oshout/r/MensRights14/03/17 10:10 PM
6

oshout/r/MensRights08/03/17 12:43 AM
5

Legal Rightsoshout/r/MensRights17/06/19 01:53 PM
4

Activism/Supportoshout/r/MensRights20/05/20 04:02 PM
1

oshout/r/MensRights09/10/18 11:18 PM
1

Social Issuesoshout/r/MensRights30/08/18 03:12 PM
0

Men's Rights Newsoshout/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:25 AM
0

Edu./Occu.oshout/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:48 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Any source? Who's taking the photo? It could be fake/staged. It seems like something that, recording and doing would both earn criminal charges.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 06:03 PM
8

Anecdote: My boss's wife is a silent, majority partner of the company so the company can get local "woman led business" incentives. I also looked into joining the local LBGT business community, but it was just a website that required a annual fee to be listed on said website. "Your ONLY local LGBT friendly computer shop" sounds nice and market-y.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 04:03 PM
31

Isn't that the credo of "men going their own way"?
/r/MensRights15/10/19 10:33 PM
3

If you ever feel you're not hired for potentially dubious reasons, your state can help you begin an inquiry into who was hired and why. I have a friend who works for the state of GA doing it, she's contacted me a couple of times for input on technical resumes. Often (In my experience) it's gender or age discrimination. Or, bad applicants. But in the cases ive seen, my friend is able to request all hiring documentation. All resumes, notes, and actions. So they can see if there is, and address des…
/r/MensRights02/09/19 03:14 PM
2

There is no like-return and that's about where I'm at with the notion of 'women's rights' vs 'women's superiority' As a man try: - To get a job without shaving your face, thus, a razer is required by society for men. - Try to get free condoms or vasectomy - compare to the litany of woman's birth control options - try to opt out of having a baby, - try and expect a fair trial in your divorce proceedings, [ and, on a tangent in edit: I wonder how many babies are conceived / born at solely a woman'…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 02:22 PM
1

Strange they call it "death by x suspect" like.. what agency is considering a suspected killer the same as an actual killer? I'm interested to see how those stats were derived. am I nitpicking??
/r/MensRights07/03/19 09:35 PM
8

Men's rights groups and activists have also been slandered by the SLPC.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:34 PM
30

It's all over my facebook, reddit, the internet. Do you avoid discussing contentious things while they're popular?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:54 PM
43

Being attacked while your baby is being kidnapped?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 08:02 PM
14

Er-- shouldn't it be, "victim of rape" not "female accuser" ? ya know that women couldn't meet the legal definition of being a rapists until like 2012, and now only if they penetrate. There was a case near me where this happened, a F.Teacher sexed an underage M.Student, penetration and all, headlines still read that she seduced him' and 'alleged sexual impropriety' story disappears a week later. Thankfully every day is mens-rights day, so everyone is keenly aware of this bias
/r/MensRights02/01/19 09:58 PM
4

From https://np.reddit.com/r/Openandgenuine/comments/9znnn8/rbestoflegaladvice_locks_laop_unable_to_get_into/
/r/MensRights23/11/18 05:56 PM
3

Dem leadership is pushing to elect women. Its not coincidence nor happenstance, it's intended. The stat of whether Dems are more inclined to vote for a woman is moot if the only democratic possibilities are women. Said otherwise, the establishment sees women as a wedge issue / differientation of which Delta they can exploit to (Increase their chances to) win, so they're pushing it. Many of my politically active Dem friends outright state they are voting straight ticket (Dem) female.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:10 AM
-1

Girls receive the education that is needed in their respective culture. And in some countries, that means no education at all! They're not kept in a cage while boys go to school. They're kept at home and attacked if they go to school. They learn life skills that are necessary for their participation in society. Something tells me your opinion is not especially educated. If you think what they learn isn't up to your standards, you must admit that this simply reflects your ethnocentric bias. Which…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 12:39 AM
-9

Are there any places where girls go to school and boys don't? To my knowledge: no. But there are places where boys go to school and girls don't. So, in order of need, and disregarding 1st world priorities which puts girls ahead of boys in education, I'm ok with this. I don't think theres an equal and needed action. In fact, this funding may make boys more competitive though it's spent on girls. Especially in typically patriartical society. Plus, I'm sure it enrages the triablistic assholes who k…
/r/MensRights09/06/18 11:22 PM
2

Google has several voices and inflections, including men. As does Siri, which also includes accents.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 12:56 AM
15

"He agreed to do it after his attorneys convinced him it was “the only option” for disproving the description of his penis by the complainant in James’ sexual assault trial. " You're asserting that since the court didn't directly order him to do this, he wasn't forced to do it. I'm asserting that it was this, or face the high probability that he'd go to jail if he didn't do this. So, no, the judge/court' didn't do it, but 'yes' the justice system did.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:47 PM
13

If I had other evidence, I'd show that before my penis. If he hadn't shown his penis, would he be in jail/found guilty?
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:29 PM
1

Great! No one should be paid less if they're similarly productive. I'm glad they're asking for everyone's salary info. Good info makes for good policy. I'm interested to see the data & how it's interpreted.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 07:03 PM
5

Debate the argument, not the person. Else you won't influence them, nor other readers. It stiffles exchange and harms the platform you're trying to support. No better than cancerous, censored subreddits otherwise. People can hold contrary views. Posting in subreddits in support, or otherwise discussing those views does not, in and of itself, invalidate them.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 11:41 PM
18

I submit this reposted, screenshot of an internet conversation: https://m.imgur.com/gallery/aOvbzgv Not scholarly but it may give you some notions to consider and explore.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 01:42 AM
4

"do you think that $SelectionBasedOnImplicitFeature is $SelectionBasedOnImplicitFeature ? "
/r/MensRights28/10/17 02:14 PM
-1

Giving one, random internet person way too much power over you. Yes it's a prolific thought, but address it when you see it, putting it on a pedestal like this solves what? Any solutions in this thread or instead "I knew it" "what about Father's day" "feminazi XD"
/r/MensRights17/10/17 09:53 PM
2

Doesn't the US government follow the SPLC? Are their claims independently verified? If they're pushing an agenda or making false claims - should we press our government leadership & general public to disavow? What else is the SPLC wrong about?
/r/MensRights14/09/17 06:36 PM
8

I've been catcalled, followed and harassed a few times, by women who hit on or flirt with me but to whom I dont return that energy. I've had one or two guys do similar, one of them turned out to be a serial rapist. I've had people I've rejected not get it, or make a fool of themselves if we saw each other in public. One women would scream, "I want to have your babies!" Among other weird things. I've also been followed around the internet for people vying for my attention, "I messaged you on OkCu…
/r/MensRights12/09/17 11:00 PM
6

I offer that it's about equality. Not everyone here is a man. Neither the sub nor notion is about making men universally better than women. Though in the context of what's frequently posted, it may seem like men are promoted above women, the sub is often used for highlighting perceived inequalities, sharing negative experiences and/or drawing parallels in which men are the victim - which I think helps to reinforce the notion of men above women. But, there's also activism and people being genuine…
/r/MensRights14/04/17 09:52 PM
1

Then link to another source like others in this thread, I hope you didn't vote down the content and comments because you didn't like the source.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:51 AM
1

Bug our legislators , rally support /awareness, reference it elsewhere, get the media involved, find programs or options to help them leave.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 03:50 AM
3

Only if she finds out, though you should carry yourself with integrity, honesty, authenticity, in all actions, even if (especially if) those actions are uncomfortable. Quote a line from a movie, like so: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3JaDbMD3hg Here's a good one from Captain America Civil War: I guess I thought – by not telling you about [what happened] I was sparing you, but… I can see now I was really sparing myself. I’m sorry. Hopefully one day you can understand. /3. What do I know I am n…
/r/MensRights03/04/17 11:12 PM
1

Great points! But! Once they receive it, it's up to them/her to put it to use! We've 'finished' our part! Plus, that it's not a bill yet, we're merely protesting! I'm pretty sure that if anyone did this they'd be in jail. Or, satarically obligated to pay child support. Or both, why not both?
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:48 PM
5

Contributors are not employees or really related to the hufpo, as stated by the disclaimer on the page. This post is hosted on the Huffington Post’s Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and post freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 12:46 AM
18

Surely intersectional feminism is on this.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 02:38 PM
21

Please don't listen to this person. The worst that'll happen is you'll be silenced and the best thing to happen would be someone to pause and consider your position. Please don't give up on people. Everyone is faliable. Ignoring or limiting each other or discussion harms progress and creates echo Chambers. there's a fine line between wasting your time arguing with a troll and offering an argument to someone who doesn't believe or want to hear it, but I'd advise to err on the side of .. love. Hav…
/r/MensRights26/02/17 03:12 AM
12

Thanks for trying, sharing, and for the support!
/r/MensRights26/02/17 12:06 AM
1

Trump threatens their freedom of choice regarding abortions. Though if you were to ask these protestors to sign a petition allowing men freedom of choice, in regards to a financial abortion or misjustices in family Court, I bet they would be reluctant. My local newspaper printed articles about how the March wasn't protesting Trump, but then dozens of charter busses funded by ??? Loaded up hundreds of people and took them to DC where it was reported nationally as against Trump.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:53 PM
1

So MRA get flak for not doing anything and just bitching about cosmos covers and now I'm getting flak about doing something? Social progress, complaining about injustice /= SJW. I'm not no platforming nor censoring - in fact I was more than amenable in my responses to those who disagreed with me on the okcupid subreddit. I'm highlighting an injustice, A free woman-centric filter without a like return for men. Put it behind a pay wall it or give men something too - OKC didn't always have a majori…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 03:26 PM
1

I'm getting off topic, but now I'm excited, heh! I'm reading OKC's TOS and so long as the data is kept on the local users machine and I don't charge for the extension, there's no issue. However if I compiled data from OKC (and other sites) centrally for redistribution, that's when things become heated. (because why even use their site when you can browse a much more comprehensive and searchable data-set?) With OKC specifically, it's probably better for users to have a local copy as some of the d…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 10:08 PM
1

If it added features to dating sites normally unavailable or costly, I don't think it needs to be marketed. Does Adblock do marketing? Reddit Enhancement Suite?
/r/MensRights06/01/17 08:36 PM
1

then why is weight a paid feature, if it's so readily apparent?
/r/MensRights06/01/17 08:16 PM
1

match.com bought OKCupid - and the site (OKC) went downhill immediately after. That seems like paying Exon instead of Chevron for gas, because you dislike oil. But I agree with the notion, paid sites == less BS. I'm now very interested in building a dating-site-scraper web extension for 'do it yourself' filters - and more. An online dating companion - perhaps allow users to comment on each other, tie it in with other data ... :))) - though time v. cost is a consideration, at a basic level (for j…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 08:15 PM
10

In the straight-dating world, men are stock, this exacerbates & perpetuates that. Equality would be a free search filter which men could use to filter out the type of women which men usually filter out - akin to filtering by height. (height/weight ratio would be perfect, because they already have that data) Alternatively, make filtering height a paid feature -- but that'll likely hurt OKC's performance with women. Combat inequality. Fight the notion that men are stock to dating sites. /r/OKC com…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 04:09 PM
3

I posted to /r/okcupid and have hit a nerve! https://np.reddit.com/r/OkCupid/comments/5mdytz/its_bs_that_height_is_a_free_search_filter_but/
/r/MensRights06/01/17 03:19 PM
13

Please consider being flexible, don't break dad's and their kids up. Relatedly: offer housing to women who won't stay at the woman's shelter because the shelter won't have male children over a certain age. Also, if you put in the leg-work legally and get the ball rolling, from my un-initiated internet-fellow point of view, if things seem on the up and up, I'd like to donate.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:45 PM
1

Everyone gets one. I have had people ask my why I don't get a DUI expunged. I'm saving that expungement!
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:23 PM
1

When I follow the link it says the event was called off. Perhaps that's unrelated text and you can only buy tickets when it's open ? Edit , Google search for this venue and screening seem to show that its still on. Edit 2, no it does look like the Atlanta screening was cancelled.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 02:05 AM
3

This post contains: Bigotry, stereotyping, straw man, perpetual victimhood and ignorance of the subject matter. Were you sure to screenshot your post and share it on your live journal or Facebook so your peers would know how edgy and progressive you are? Shitposts don't happen without an audience. Good luck getting laid this way, bro! I mean seriously, who are you hoping to influence? Also, most anti mrm narrative is patently false. I hope you enjoy the red pill movie by former feminist Cassie J…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 03:17 AM
1

"Technically it's not censorship" because it's not a government doing it - the authors words and inference. Basically theyre stating that the people writing demanding censorship and the movie theater censoring is free market and thus not censorship.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 01:57 AM
1

I like /r/femradebates - but it's more of a middle ground than a progressive-human drive. The top comment currently has it right, /r/egalitarianism
/r/MensRights27/10/16 08:34 PM
1

The independent.co.uk fabricated treasonous Snowden leaks and passed it on as though it came from him. Not related, but fuck em.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 05:04 PM
3

Why is that advice targeted towards women? It's sound advice for everyone.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 06:19 PM
3

http://www.thenational.scot/politics/womens-group-calls-for-number-of-females-in-prison-to-be-capped-at-100.16465
/r/MensRights28/04/16 07:06 PM
1

I'm sure the same thing is said by those protesting against Trump and look how that has brought people against those protestors
/r/MensRights17/04/16 11:27 AM
-1

He didn't live in a world where everyone has cameras and the internet.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 11:24 AM
1

The MR group which was recently banned by facebook had the decision reversed and is back online. I don't believe that by not participating, you're furthering a cause which is important to you. You're instead volunteering to be silenced. I mean, there are a lot of reasons to avoid facebook like the plague, but I don't see evidence of them going out of their way to persecute MRA. What actions have they taken that's anti-MR?
/r/MensRights14/04/16 05:00 PM
-2

You can't clamor to get her banned if your guys are doing it too. If you think it's wrong and you do it, you're the moron, the moral moron. I dont like it when others litter, it doesn't give me justification to litter. The only time it's acceptable to jump on the cart is when that pressure will create change. and in this instance it may. Facebook may change their systems, but that's the fight then, not her ideological reasons or stopping anti-mra, but that you think that Facebook should have bet…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 10:41 PM
10

That just begets the same thing more and more. Take the high-ground. It's difficult for me to comprehend giving them, or others justification to continue. Either it's acceptable to do and it's pointless to get riled up over it, or it's unacceptable and we must not promote it ourselves.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 04:10 PM
1

"the red pill" was a phrase I noticed becoming common nomenclature reluctantly adopted by the "manosphere" (really?) after Cassie Jaye advertised her awkwardly named movie, "The red pill, down the rabbit hole of gender politics" But the term redpill is more aptly, and originally, correlated to the PUA group known as "the red pill" and as such, shouldn't be correlated with MRM. I believe /r/theredpill was a subreddit before /r/mensrights. I strongly disagree that /r/theredpill or PUA are at all i…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:33 PM
1

The difference between thinking men get fucked (discriminated against) on a judicial and societal level and face different levels of expectations and actions; and tricking women by manipulating your personality & actions in a desperate bid to get them to sleep/interact with you are WORLDS apart. To not draw a distinction between the two because they're both operated by men or seek to redress discrimination is a disservice to the MRM and allows PUA jackoffs to play their BS as acceptable to the w…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 01:29 PM
1

Drop the retarded feminist newspeak, please. We should probably stop the infighting I realize the subject is a man, but spokes person is a valid definition. If someone called you a spokeswoman, would you not think about it? It not inconvenient to replace my verbiage: it's considerate and energy efficient (mentally and in presentation, I've saved tons of energy, not just with this example). It's not mandatory for MRA to oppose every aspect of feminism or progress. An interesting thought; whereas …
/r/MensRights27/03/16 09:33 PM
3

I received this as a forward from a friend. I hope /mr can be rational in pulling it apart. I told my friend that the guy didn't speak for the MRA movement, I explained how redpill was different. That this was a hit piece, biased and on a mission. I explained the wage gap being a contended or flat out wrong bit of info which Bernie continually campaigned on. And that it wasn't likely that Trump's campaign kicked out those black students pre-emptively- he hadn't done it in past or present, the st…
/r/MensRights27/03/16 02:48 AM
2

Which part of my message makes you think that?
/r/MensRights02/03/16 12:27 AM
0

I don't know enough about the subject so I'll give an imaginary situation and also play your argument: "Do you support KKK member Anony Mous?" "Who?" "he was a big proponent of the KKK in the 1960's" "No, I don't support him" "that particular individual was doing KKK protests and saved 500 black babies from a burning orphanage before disavowing the KKK and starting several minority programs- which part of that don't you support?" "Well, I mean.." See, it's not so black and white, even though tha…
/r/MensRights02/03/16 12:18 AM
-1

If I were to name 100 people, some of good importance and some of negative, would you be able to accurately support or refute each one? Did ya know Trump refuted the guy prior? But I suppose one slipup, one moment of forgetfulness is all some need to be able to confirm their bias.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 11:29 PM
4

Not everyone feels that way: friends or dates. And sometimes I do pay, especially for friends, which can also be dates. I think them saying, "you hate women" is contributed by it being known that I participate in /r/mensrights and my counter-points to common narrative. If not from in this discussion alone, then from the entirety of my interaction with them. Though, it becomes a common refrain during this particular discussion. And, being honest, the topic over time has become easier for them to …
/r/MensRights28/02/16 05:14 PM
35

I think most people are conditioned to believe that women demand men to pay. I have friends who talk about my unwillingness to pay. Sometimes, my female friends will relay that to new women I meet before romantic intent is defined. I've had a number of heated discussions with friends of both sexes about it and they come away with "you hate women"
/r/MensRights28/02/16 04:53 PM
1

Obama's asking businesses over 100 employees to report wage data: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/why-publishing-salary-data-won-t-fix-the-gender-wage-gap-204232077.html That's not self reporting, that's regulation.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:31 PM
7

Obama requested hard data from companies a few months back to put this to rest - I wonder what became of that.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:36 PM
7

It depends on your definitions. I think most MRA want equality and are prompted by an observation of inequality. There's likely some contention regarding projects which seek to offset disadvantages but I think on the whole, most MRA would be satisfied if men and women were treated as equals in all areas. The contention part comes into play when you start getting into gender norms and current reality, for example: "man up" might be a common refrain/thought which is repeated in some form but abhor…
/r/MensRights16/02/16 04:09 AM
3

To be fair, they're (feminists) looking at the issue through the lens they're most comfortable with. I equate BB's behavior with that of SJW's - humorous that feminists are aghast when it's used against them. I prefer the term BernieBot, it's equal opportunity bullheadedness. I wonder if who's misappropriating the term, me or them: I consider BernieBot (BernieBro) anyone who's so involved in that cult of personhood they can't accept any criticism of their dear-leader or his proposals, can't hold…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 06:14 PM
4

Where do you draw the line? If your 14 year old kid is sexting and exchanging nudes with a 21 year old you have a parental responsibility to discipline. If your kid bought a pistol, it's not wrong to wrong to take it away. What if the ultimatum was "unlock this phone so I can prosecute the guy you're exchange nudes with or say goodbye to the phone"?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:56 PM
3

Where do you draw the line? If your 14 year old kid is sexting and exchanging nudes with a 21 year old you have a parental responsibility to discipline. If your kid bought a pistol, it doesn't make it wrong to take it away.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 01:55 PM
3

This is the type of poster MRA should be funding to get placed in schools. It takes 0 thought to realize it's unfair and it could also potentially save someone. I agree it's offensive, but them's the breaks - no sense hiding from reality.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 09:30 PM
1

They're methods of conveyance (getting there). We have an engrained system and we're wanting to make changes to get to where we want, we're not creating a new system, but rather evolving. To get there it's important we discuss, highlight, challenge and be challenged. No one's perfect or all-knowing. I realize the MRM is a wide umbrella, but what piques my interest are inequalities; and they do exist. I think especially that by eradicating those inequalities (which first must be identified) we'll…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 11:25 PM
1

Should have pulled a Rosa Parks.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 02:27 PM
6

Impossible? Cut off your arms, legs, penis, nose, tongue and potentially lower jaw. Improbable? star in gay porn. Realistically? Get to know the person before you sleep with them to make sure they're not crazy or drama.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:05 AM
7

It's an interesting platform for discussion: anyone who writes off the documentary or movement as though it was related to TRP presents an opportunity to be corrected. And if they refuse then they're purposely misinterpreting and can be easily (publicly) written off.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 08:46 PM
6

I haven't ever heard of a similar case perpetrated by a male; is this the new normal?
/r/MensRights31/10/15 05:26 PM
0

Are you shamed by the thought of a penis? Who's fault is that and who should curtail to that? "I'm shamed by the color red, please, no stop signs." "I'm shamed by clouds, so get on that. " Yes, it's weird. No, it's not critical. Reverse the roles of students and teachers; if students drew a dick on a paper (which, judging by my own doodles, they do), should the teacher be entitled to outrage and compensation? How can you speak for the environment when you're not there? Meaning, maybe the teacher…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 01:45 PM
1

Take your own advice; I was responding to the comment that contrary opinions were invalid because the commentor posting them didn't post in MR enough. edit; I just realized that this comment is very similar to the topic we're discussing. A little ironic.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 01:41 PM
1

I drew dicks all over my shit. I still draw dicks on shit; who cares. Are you offended by anatomy? And turn in your internet-sleuth badge because there are about a dozen comments stating exactly what I do, even one from last week: I work for a tech shop which has an over abundance of equipment, and an especially loud server. Though I'm not sure how working for a teachers union would invalidate an opinion that drawing a dick isn't a big deal. You want to flip the roles? flip the role of the stude…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 01:40 PM
1

You're using a comparison of posting in /r/mr as validation for related opinion; so I'm doing the same on a broader scale. It's ridiculous, as you can see. Being an account which posts here more frequently doesn't mean your opinion is right, nor that people who have never posted here before have no validity. I'm of the opinion MR should strive to be better than what it views as opposition. To hold itself to higher principals while simultaneously striving for equality. Based on your replies to th…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 06:30 PM
2

Wowee, that sounds like something I'd expect to hear from a feminist/sjw subreddit when they ban someone for not toeing the party line. You've only been on reddit 3 years so why don't you follow your own logic and show yourself the door? edit; not that there's a MRA party-line.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 05:50 PM
0

No that teachers are fired because they were strippers before teachers, or because they have a photo of themselves on facebook drinking out of a red plastic cup. Who cares, i mean really. would the kid be suspended or expelled if he drew a penis on his paperwork?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 05:29 PM
17

I wouldn't be upset if a male did it so I have a difficult time being upset when a female did it. Are there differing levels of expectations? Sure. But I won't take part in victimhood culture - I won't propagate it. It's weird that she did it. It's weird that the school would have fired her for not admitting it, it's weird that the student's parents are looking at taking him to a different school. I hate that we hold teachers to such absurd levels - there needs to be room to be human.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:53 PM
2

How is OP's received response gender biased? I mean, the FBI might not stick to this person's interpretation but the interpretation and this post don't seem to expose anything of the sort.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 10:03 PM
1

Are there any case studies of this happening elsewhere? It'd be interesting to see how this impacts their bottom line over time or if it encourages more women to join STEM.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 04:24 PM
1

Why don't the police do something? They both own the house, who are the police to tell you you can't change your locks or bust out a window? If he breaks in, he would likely be arrested and people like the jerks in the /r/nottheonion thread would believe themselves correct. Wheras if he's hurt from exposure, I'd think she'd be proven callous - for whatever that's worth.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 08:58 PM
3

I found this in /r/nottheonion ... here Frustrating to see anyone questioning the narrative downvoted - so many controversial comments pointing out that we can't know the truth. That allegations aren't convictions.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 04:09 PM
1

This question is asked once a week, it seems.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 06:57 PM
1

"Not these social constructs but THESE social constructs"
/r/MensRights04/10/15 01:57 PM
2

sensationalist headline. The argument was limited, focused repeatedly on the same subject. They made some good points but they were breezed past and brought back to the same discussion. There's so much more than what was brought up, that I think this is a bad introduction to MRM, though not necessarily a bad discussion to have. Regarding the repeated topic of women being home bodies and men being workers: I don't think causation is supported by those statistics. Men and women should be free to d…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 01:23 AM
1

France is suing to enforce their internet censorship laws worldwide. Google is putting together a similar team as to the intent in this article.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 10:21 PM
3

I don't understand how that photo relates to women. Is it implied that 50% of the population (women) have inherent, uncorrectable weaknesses? I understand your intention in correcting, and so I won't fault you for voicing frustration. I also disagree that the subject of this submission is a negative thing. I think of myself as a progressive; I try not to fear the unknown-- still; what are potential drawbacks and alternative? The comprehensive education they reference seems untested in modern tim…
/r/MensRights23/09/15 09:52 PM
8

Opposed to those who don't feel comfortable sharing the bathroom with people of the same sex?
/r/MensRights01/09/15 08:26 PM
2

As a non-gold member you're limited to seeing 50 subreddits at a time which are random each time you load the front page, I believe.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 12:26 AM
1

What about /r/thirdwavefeminism ? Their sidebar and some of the submissions I saw seemed much more clear-headed than /r/feminism and thirdwavefeminism seemed to be created to contrast the authoritarian nature of its counterpart; or maybe that was my bias?
/r/MensRights24/08/15 12:43 PM
7

Both sides have valid points but when you mix emotion in, things become heated, it's hard to remain unbiased. You don't have to be a male to support men's rights, simply recognizing that men have issues which aren't often (or easily) addressed is good help. Similarly with feminism, but I feel like an outsider in that direction: some of the things I think hurt women are also good and hard won. Equal treatment especially in regards to the law would be a negative thing for women but I wont argue fo…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 07:28 PM
-5

No, its a post of Yoda fucking Skywalker, and the top comments insinuate rape. People make funny faces when they're taking it up the ass. Should I find a citation? hehehe
/r/MensRights19/08/15 11:58 PM
5

Whenever this is brought up, there are some very agitated people who say "Think of the bails bondsmen! they didn't do anything wrong!" If you have to have a third party help you out of jail perhaps bail is unreasonable, contrary to what the law requires and what bails bondsmen would like you to believe.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 08:05 PM
0

I concede that if you're accused of a crime, they'll book you. But not every rape accusation ends in conviction, several high profile cases have not. there are chats where 3 girls plan to 'fuck with his mind and his car!' because 'it will be so much fun!' That is not listed in the article linked. There is a vague quote about something being fun but it lacks context. What, are they going to quote "just" "kidding" "i" "lied" as proof? why the fuck would he be guilty without further evidence? have …
/r/MensRights14/06/15 05:46 PM
0

would an innocent man go to jail without evidence? If they retrieved these messages, and there was no conspiracy-, would he be guilty without further evidence? Is there any evidence of this conspiracy? Consider the two direct quotes available in the 98,000 pages of evidence that have available now.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 05:16 PM
7

That's a good distinction, and I didn't realize that. I think it changes the weight of the issue in his favor, in the eye of the public, but I'm not sure that holds true for the law. If his case were to progress, and let's hypothesize that there was either no conspiracy or no access to records - would he be convicted from the allegations from the girls alone? edit; for backstory, I've seen subpoenas for people's mailboxes, where based on limited evidence, likely would have thrown the case into d…
/r/MensRights14/06/15 04:24 AM
3

Because it stands to reason that if they had anything more substantial they would have written that in the article, opposed to what they did: 'Tyler needs to be taught a lesson,' ran one interaction, reports KSAZ, as well as 'We should sacrifice him to Satan.'
/r/MensRights14/06/15 04:18 AM
3

I fail to see how this is different from any privacy issue or the crux of the argument against the NSA's (&similar) data collection. Again I pose to you, would you be comfortable with your records being searched because an online acquaintance said "you'll get yours" to another? Defense attorney, the government, john doe, I don't care. Have some proof, you can't vaguely supenoa the records of a population to find a killer. To top it off, you act as though the defense-lawyer will act properly - wh…
/r/MensRights14/06/15 04:16 AM
5

'It's not the state's job to go on a fishing expedition for the defense, which is very clear within the case law,' he said The article seems a bit sparse here. If they have substantial proof, I'd think the state would allow it a subpoena. Just because someone says "you ought to be taught a lesson" to you, doesn't mean they're excluded from being or have been raped. Since the article is sparse on the verbage, and they went through 90,000 records the worst is : 'Tyler needs to be taught a lesson,'…
/r/MensRights14/06/15 03:37 AM
-20

Hey, one of your friends told someone on the internet, "I hope you get yours", we'd like all your email and social media and chat records to go through.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 03:32 AM
5

The two potential groups of girls, those who have been raped and girls falsely filing rape accusations overlap only incidentally.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 03:28 AM
9

Canada and mensrights do not have good opinions of one another, it seems. Does mensrights mean something different there?
/r/MensRights08/06/15 04:14 PM
49

Sex shaming doesn't ever seem like a valid argument. It reminds me of how when men discuss issues which effect women, you'll hear people say "this is why you'll never get laid." or similar. There's enough content to hate on here without nebulous comments about whether the commenters are justified by their sexual history.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 06:28 PM
2

I realize it's become a norm and that I'm not in the majority, but I disagree with subbing from archive.today because I think page hits, when linked from /r/mensrights gives /r/mensrights presence, and that just because you're viewing a page, doesn't mean the owner is profiting because most people have adblock. That said, I'd be happy to see a system similar to what /r/futurology has.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:00 AM
3

Just like all crimes perpetrated by men against women sentences are halfed because the women were heterosexual. Though, maybe this is the same reasoning which sees female perps get off with relatively less punishment.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:49 PM
3

It's late and I'm reading this before bed, but I think it's more useful to pose: where in men's rights have gay men been excluded? There's a bit of conflicting duality when it comes to fighting gender norms vs. Reducing what it means to be a boy/man. But the distinction between sexualities isn't ever defined. You can be masculine or effemenitely straight, homosexual or anywhere in between. We have empathy for both mtf and ftm transgender. Some of the issues may pertain to certain segments of tha…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:57 AM
1

just because it has some merrit, doesn't mean we should enact it. edit; it's both fun and useful to discuss alternatives and potential outcomes. which is why i suppose we're on a message exchange medium. oh and i don't know if I would identify as liberal - it seems to have a transient meaning to mean boogie-man.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:01 AM
-1

Vasectomy's aren't permanent. I'm not sure women can have their reproductive processes stopped as easily nor efficiently, while still being able to be reversed. Not having looked at the article, I kind of like the idea. It would prevent the situation which occurred in the movie Idiocracy
/r/MensRights13/05/15 11:41 PM
1

I keep extra tooth brushes, tooth paste, and extra bags in the bathroom trash can. they should make a box of tampons and pads for men - so we can store them at our houses easily. like a mixed sample kit. I'd toss a couple in my truck, done deal. Ladies, please carry a condom on you!
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:26 PM
-4

While I am sympathetic, as someone who finds it easy to avoid making babies I can't take care of, I find it difficult to relate. That said, the laws are illogical and needs to be looked at. There's probably a cottage industry propping it up.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:33 PM
2

Not life and death necessary. They throw another couple a's onto your illness as you adapt as an adult. Also the word 'advanced' for some reason. Maybe I'm envious and don't fully understand. Though I've adapted pretty well. If I stated taking those drugs I'd have to adapt all over again. The sigma outweighs the benefit in my opinion.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 01:09 PM
7

A lot of comments saying he deserved it for being in jail. how inhumane. How is anyone supposed to be rehabilited under those conditions? We deserve criminals for not pushing/allowing people to become productive members of society. at least they're trolls and not tied to actual people accounts - people recognize it's not OK at some level.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 01:51 PM
1

I have a friend in a similar situation, I think his lid will be flipped when he sees this video. While I agree that this isn't the best possible use of time, it does serve a purpose.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 01:39 AM
1

There are 107237 subscribers and probably 376 browsing the subreddit when you looked :) There are a lot of issues - read the sticky for this weeks' flavor of recognition. Also read most any submission for a direct example of infringement or disenfranchising. Also, not all MR activists are straight and male :)
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:09 PM
1

I had a similar situation in which I failed to turn in a rough draft and took a hit for the entire project (project accounted for 30% of final grade)- a female classmate later bragged to me about turning on the water works so the teacher would accept her late rough draft and thus her entire project. I was angry at the time, but thought myself a victim of circumstances. I found humor in that the teacher seemed to have a empowered woman mindset but buckled to a crying woman. Anyway, I ended up wri…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:05 PM
-1

Either ignore the content or post directly. Reading through archives is fine if the content had changed. By linking directly an impact is created through referral links. When you follow a link, the site can see where you're coming from, giving us a voice. If a site only sees a feminist presence, guess where content will lean?
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:29 PM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qgnxb-O-CBQ
/r/MensRights23/02/15 03:08 AM
13

Meninism is satire of feminism. Men's rights an ideology and MRA a noun. Meninism should be taken as both satire of and sarcasm against feminism.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 01:27 AM
1

whoaverse redirects to voat.co now but my username was taken and i don't think by me :S
/r/MensRights09/02/15 03:40 AM
4

I'm not sure if that's the entirety of the meninist movement or if it's specific to this thead. I agree it's hard to claim the moral high ground when you're willing to use the same b.s. tactics and arguments. I also think that risk is created when this type of satire is done, people not involved might not get it and assume the same about this movement as that. But golly it's refreshing , perhaps due to the humor. There's definitely a cognitive dissonance of people's acceptance of men's rights vs…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:40 PM
24

Satire. They're turning anti men's rights arguments 180 degrees around.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:21 PM
2

Against it because: I've never seen content removed. And I think the men's right referral link is very important. When you follow a link, the page you arrive at can see where you've come from. Archiving prevents that. If all referral links show feminist but not men's rights, guess where content is going to slant? I think this is a petty idea and I'm disheartened that those disagreeing with archiving have been voted down. Makes me want to resubmit archived articles as direct link and follow them …
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:23 PM
2

Some people would rather you link to an archive of the page to prevent the source from getting page views. I think that's a bad idea because it reduces our presence due to referral links.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 03:51 PM
-1

Please don't be so petty.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 03:50 PM
-1

I didn't think about it being modified, though now the comment to the self-copy-bot makes sense. Have there been any recent cases of this happening? My original comment is influenced by interactions I've experienced recently in /r/mensrights. Archive usage as a means of 'getting back at our enemies' by depriving them of views. I would still be cautious if not fearful of that happening. Though open to the prospect of an archive link. Conversely, if this were accused to have happened or became an …
/r/MensRights24/01/15 03:59 AM
-1

When you follow a link, the website you go to can see where that link originates. So if you go to an article on theatlantic.com from /r/mensrights then theatlantic will see "x unique views from /r/mensrights on this article" and potentially other meta data, like friends of yours who visited the site, or a chain where someone on the web linked to the mensrights thread which linked to their article. I'm not sure what kind of impact direct views would have on an author's bias, but if I were in char…
/r/MensRights24/01/15 02:05 AM
-7

This seems petty. Wouldn't adblock be sufficient? Linking to them directly would show them a referral link on their analytics which would be /r/mensrights. With enough volume on enough articles maybe we could have an indirect voice. Maybe in some instances, rehosting is preferable, like if you didn't want to make an impact or if the content had changed. But rehosting current media for the purpose of denying ad revenue seems cheap and faulty. I think it undermines what should be a vocal and in-si…
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:49 AM
2

People generally like labels, seeking patterns and reinforcing their beliefs. Division is labeling.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 11:33 PM
6

If we live in an infinite universe, there should be a way to change her mind. What is it?
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:15 AM
14

And - if he had blocked and unfriended her before that opportunity - they would have both been at a loss.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:01 AM
3

It seems like there are different values and energy from men & women in regards to this topic. Is there a middle-ground? I think it's dual-fronted: If there were less sexual assaults an increasing number of accusations would be false Both need to be addressed. The number of sexual assaults should be driven down by a collective effort of acknowledgement and potentially* action but also society should have reasonable expectations in regards to justice too. I think there's a big disconnect in our c…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:59 PM
76

Get a vasectomy. Also, communicate with her. Does she respect you?
/r/MensRights02/12/14 05:58 PM
1

Has your mom ever written an essay on this subject?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:05 PM
1

Every little detail meaning none? There are 0 details. Haha oh no you called me a bitch, I have been refuted. There's even a sticky saying to watch out for false flags yet this substanceless hooey, a picture without any details, background and with facts purposely obscured, which could also be fabricated easily is a top mens rights issue? Use your brain, smart guy.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:11 PM
-9

My BS meter is alerting. Not enough substance: No explanation of where this is at, OP is a throwaway. Titles look at different levels. Scared of 'outting' the school? and what repercussions? Why not just post which school it is and do it anonymously so that it could be fact checked? Or any other form of fact check for this issue? I think there are much better things to get riled up about other than something without much evidence behind it.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:53 AM
6

When did this happen? What steps have you taken since?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:50 AM
-1

Like the oceans, which no one swims in. Do you deny there are issues which take place there? How would you recommend resolving them?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:42 PM
3

Funny, I don't watch TV nor think about celebrities and somehow I managed to 'not give a shit' enough not to look. Men's culture? More like media culture. They blame men for the fallout but my data stored online has double factor authentication. I've also encrypted personal things and change my passwords somewhat regularly. I'm not saying that they're at fault for having their password guessed - but if your password is your birthday or something you've used places which have been compromised the…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 07:08 PM
3

Hrm, what about the app LuLu ? Isn't it anonymous for the people commenting on men?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 07:43 PM
2

Oh, the never-ending dishonesty of shit-bag feminists... Who, me? Seems like you're the one with intellectual dishonesty - anyone who disagrees with you is wrong or the enemy? Pigeon-holed and written off. They were free to leave and someone else was willing to sit in the seat and watch it. complaints to be made to whomever organizes this but if they continue to buy it, it's not likely to change. Repeating: They weren't held hostage. there are real world equivalencies. people will take your seat…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:42 PM
6

Like trailers before a movie. Were their eyes held open and their arms strapped down? Forbidden from taking to their neighbors or using their phones? Not that I agree nor know anything about the content but it seems like this would make more enemies than understanding.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 02:20 AM
4

Sounds like icarley gave you an opportunity to discuss with your daughter why you felt this was offensive.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 09:48 PM
4

Why electrical sockets look surprised? Is baby powder made from babies?
/r/MensRights16/07/14 01:35 PM
4

It's adding: Asking a question which should be asked for every article placed here. Which if not outright apparent should be asked. It's not a repeat. The question has elicited a response which elaborates and answers the question. How could that question be asked as to not come across as a whine? I think the inflection is "don't we have more important things to do" which comes across as strict-constructive not neutral/derisive.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 02:14 AM
1

Can we please stop down voting questions..
/r/MensRights06/07/14 05:40 PM
1

What I don't understand is why abortion protestors can be right up on the door because sidewalks are public property but OWS protesters were arrested for protesting on the sidewalk and shuffled to free speech cages.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:09 PM
1

Who made the report? Shouldn't their name be public as well?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:23 PM
7

I have not found that to be common at all. People read and believe what they want - which is usually whatever gets them going. "Alleged" = "Absolute Truth"
/r/MensRights23/06/14 04:22 PM
0

Screw the independent.co.uk - they published information and falsely linked it to Snowden and then tried to use that as proof of Snowden doing something which put people in harm's way. Garbage. I suggest you all block it in your hosts: open notepad as administrator, open c:\windows\system32\drivers\ect\host enter: independent.co.uk <tab> 0.0.0.0 where tab is the actual button and not the word <tab>
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:24 PM
2

I posted an article about how 6 republican governors were not following law/guidelines intended to reduce or address rape in prisons - which was downvoted to a score of 0 and i was told 'let's not be divisive'. There may have been some untruth to the article, or biased slant, but all i saw was 'if it shows republicans in a negative light, fuck whatever it is' even though this was only about 6 reps and not the party as a whole.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:46 PM
5

Yes, being fed makes people homeless, you solved the puzzle. It's an easy correlation though - that if you feed the homeless, the homeless will come to be fed. Which I support in a supportive environment. The worst I've seen it is in Tampa, where I assume the weather is always livable. I just read an article that said Tampa had the highest rate of homelessness in the US - 56 homeless for every 10,000 non-homeless. There are people on every street corner, in every intersection, outside all busine…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:02 AM
1

There's reasoning - it encourages people to be homeless. (Which sounds mean, but hey, when's the last time you housed, tried to help or got to know a homeless person?) I don't think it's a slant against men any more than women. That said, I think men get the short end of being homeless - that there's not enough good resources for them. But I don't think having daily food giveaways helps anyone. At least at the shelter for food they're in a promoting environment - opposed to an easy (I know..) ho…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:01 AM
2

What happens if she's accused of sexual assault?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:47 PM
1

I'm not up to date on the terminology of trans-people. I read through your comments but some things which you critiqued seemed to be repeated in your critiques. So apologies if I step on toes. I don't think there's much coverage of trans-issues in MRM circles, but that doesn't mean they're not a good fit. I think the MRM is still gaining it's bearings. I've been on r/mensrights for a over a year now and besides this thread, think I've seen a total of two trans specific threads. This is also my '…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:31 PM
1

do search on news.google.com for men's rights and read the top results. A lot of is it vitriol which to me seems' grabbing at straws. But they do not seem scared. They seem convicted in their opinions - though I was looking for specific examples of their claims but none of the articles get too specific - all of them make some broad generalizations. It's also sad to see that a recent men's right's 'concert' was canceled and their view point is "the cafe didn't realize the groups beliefs before le…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:33 PM
4

In the us the kid can make the decision where to stay at age 13. I chose to leave my mom and live w/ my dad across the country.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 01:22 PM
1

I had never heard of that interpretation and that you don't know the seed/plant is shows it has another meaning. The wikipedia page cites a tenuious, unlinked sourced on the subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silphium#cite_note-14 Granted, if we're looking at modern adoption it seems to be "health" and love, and not necessarily romantic love. I suppose my original statement on the heart symbol was anecdotal, reinforced by popular media.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:59 PM
-18

Sex sells. The iconic heart shape is a women's bosume. Where's the erect penis iconic shape!? I hard-wiener you. (similar to "I <3 you")
/r/MensRights31/05/14 03:12 PM
5

I think women have it much worse than me as far as being molested or aggressed upon or feeling generally more insecure in their surroundings . That said, I think a lot of the things she's describing happen to everyone sometimes. Maybe not having someone causally molesting them from a passing bicycle; but rather at the receiving end of unwanted attention: physical, emotional or other investment- from both men and women. I'm a tall, red-headed, skinny, yet relatively attractive (toot), nerd. I was…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:12 PM
0

Sad that such a large issue facing men is nullified by partisan politics - by which i mean this post voted down. Makes me re-evauluate the MR movement, especially considered w/ other recent posts which do have upvotes which have little to do w/ advancing the cause and are more like outrage-porn. and re: the 6 repub governors, im not sure how it's partisan because its not all repubs- still, any inkling of negativity toward an individuals chosen ones is met not w/ rebuking but w/ outright denial o…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 11:27 AM
7

Most of the internet are idiots, lewd, reaction seeking trolls. can the same be said about those posters on tumblr hating on men? or are they intelligent enough to know better? If they're idiots, I won't blame them. They don't know anything else. If they're intelligent, that's where I have a problem. It becomes vile and worse, demanding of recognition and affirmation. Some idiot calls me a fag on xbox live? Like I care. But when someone dissects something in such a way to be willfully destructiv…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:38 PM
0

I have known wealthy children who have very similar senses of entitlement. Who don't have anything to show proudly as a product of their own effort. and so clamor to find ways to make people acknowledge whatever they can. They feel they deserve and they desire praise/recognition without doubt: "I'm riding in my BMW, drinking and driving, I don't give a shit, dad will pay the bills. I'm one of the elite." A tower of 'things' which ought to make one feel proud, if they were actually earned and ach…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:14 PM
24

When I was 16 or 17, living with my dad, I had the police at my house telling my dad that it was lawful for parents to assault their children: "Sometimes when I tell parents that, they let loose right infront of me! wink wink, nudge nudge" The officer explained to me I could be charged for assault as an adult if I defended myself or fought back and my dad pressed charges. because of my age. I also couldn't leave the house, because the police could pick me up and bring me home. This was in Texas.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 06:33 PM
12

I didn't watch video. Masturbating in public, around people = not cool. No room to spin it otherwise. It shouldn't take being told you're making someone uncomfortable. And while I agree recording it is throwing gasoline on her outrage I think recording people and holding them accountable is an apt way to coerce people into doing the socially right thing.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:11 PM
7

Er.. seems like you're replacing one discrimination with another. I was a young kid flying by himself on planes. None of that was ever an issue.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 12:51 PM
2

I don't think lemonade is an apt comparison/analogy. I think instead people could be made aware of the important MR issues as I don't think people are likely to be exposed to that without looking for it. Part of me thinks you could give away lemonade and say something like "men working so you don't have to" - but that seems hostile, reactionary, sexist and an cop out as far as what information is out there and what you're sharing.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 02:06 PM
3

Can you participate and ask questions or are they simply trying to make a point? If it's the latter, maybe instead of protesting vociferously you can have a men's rights day and simply counter/respond to their message at a later time.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 01:10 PM
1

A couple of links to share /r/egalitarian/ /r/FeMRADebates/
/r/MensRights20/04/14 05:40 PM
3

My idea: Send a blanket message to every user who has commented in MR the last 30 days That message contains a link to a survey and a unique code. The code is tied to their user name and can only be used once. Meaning it requires both the code and username tied to the code to proceed. The code is generated by hand to be random - to reduce likelyhood that the code will be cracked. Then the survey accounts for non-MR or Anti-MR by asking them to indicate. Not to be used to discredit or not include…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:41 AM
2

Wil lost a lot of my respect - he's been harping blindly on MR for about a year. He used to be one of the few I liked on FB and followed on G.plus, but I've removed him after reading his pigeon holing of mensrights. I roll my eyes when I see him on TBBT now, what a jackass.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 10:05 PM
1

Is she tweeting professionally? As in, tweeting things for her job on her personal account? Does she hold personal views which are contrary to the position she holds? If she's tweeting professionally on a personal account, is she also chosing to block people who don't hold her personal viewpoints? That site was painful to read. I couldn't finish it, I was very lost as to who's who and what their ultimate point was. edit; I'm not trying to be obtuse or difficult. I am open minded and willing to d…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 10:28 PM
2

Thank you for appreciating my humor, you are very direct and I can appreciate that. The stimuli which creates her 'post traumatic stress disorder' is something she submits herself to continually which is a bit on the nose. I am not promoting cyber-stalking or harassment, but it's a reality of existing. I'm also not wanting to say that the solution is to stop being vocal about what's important to you but maybe instead it's, "go on the offensive"- you don't shut down when being DDOS'd, you mitigat…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 10:02 PM
11

The article suggests the accusers were male.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 07:37 PM
1

How.dare.you.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 06:31 PM
3

This comment gave me ptsd and now im going to read it over and over again. /s
/r/MensRights13/04/14 06:31 PM
1

First, fuck labels. Second, why wrap yourself in additional cloaks especially as a means to subdivide? I'm not here for an ego-stroke nor to have my opinions reinforced- I won't ignore that women have equality issues, but what riles me up is that some women and society at large want to ignore men's, and furthermore, those same detractors would denounce even the thought of imbalance, when I can see it plainly exists. I feel like I'm fighting injustice for men by recognizing and discussing the imb…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 01:21 PM
1

But what high profile cases would the office be abuzz about then? It seems like they just transition from one to the next. School shootings are a similar attraction for the people interested in what I think amounts to celebrity news.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 04:56 PM
-1

I often see comments in /r/mensrights that say "there's no use in trying to explain". Simple questions downvoted, as though someone could have the audacity to question the OP or desire more information. Definitely not only a problem of feminism.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:32 PM
1

Helicopter parents do this.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 05:58 PM
6

No commercials on bbc..
/r/MensRights08/03/14 04:11 PM
2

You are wrong on every assumption.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 01:42 PM
1

Our society isn't equal. If you had $1000 to spend to to bring 1000 people 'up' would you give one dollar to each person, or give more to the people who needed more help? I agree that all men need help, role models, but I think that minority men have it especially bad.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:48 PM
1

Funny that someone in MR asked this question but posed in a slightly different way: "when is it OK to rape?" and was blown out of the water by people taking offense to the very existence of the question.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:18 AM
5

White male here. I'm OK with this. I think that any positive progress or energy is good for mens rights, especially so for minorities. Everything doesn't always have to be about me :)
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:14 AM
2

It would build a court case. If a company was hiring explicitly women, advertised or otherwise, and an applicant lied making it to the interview process where they were discovered, sure, they may be DQ'd, but to me that clinches the sexism argument. "My qualifications get me the job as a female, but not as a male." Regardless of the 'typo' being an indicator of professionalism, I think a court could appreciate the obvious parallel. "Qualifications as female = job. Qualifications as male = no job…
/r/MensRights25/02/14 03:22 PM
0

Then instead of saying you didn't notice, tell them you were working a hunch. Perception: Ignorance to problem solving. edit; and I've heard stories of people being hired just so they would sign off on illegal things companies were doing and then later take the blame. So, sometimes they do hire for ignorance.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 02:51 PM
-7

Apply as a female. Then when they want to interview you based on your qualifications, say it was a mistake.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 01:43 PM
1

I wonder how many commentors are men saying they're women... FEAST ON YOUR HATRED; EAT YOURSELF.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:06 PM
1

What country is OP from?
/r/MensRights30/01/14 10:25 PM
12

I agreed with the top commentor about a larger historical definition until I read this comment.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:17 PM
1

Actually.. marijuana is a stimulant, depressant and hallucinogenic - yes, all three simultaneously.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 03:11 PM
0

I don't know how much of Saudi Arabia's news is state-sponsored, but when reading an article about women's driving privileges it seemed as though women were perfectly fine with the ban, some of the quotes said things like: "A woman shouldn't know of the world" "A woman should respect her husbands wishes" "Driving bad for their overies" "A woman's place is at home." I participated in a talk about driving in SA on my facebook when we came across a seperate article which showed the people supportin…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:00 PM
5

This was posted to pics and is currently sitting at the top of my controversial list. Most of the comments in the thread I've linked are arguments which hate on the woman in the photo for daring to disagree: http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1uucgx/you_are_doing_it_right_it_is_2014_not_1914
/r/MensRights10/01/14 01:14 PM
173

I thought one exposing the virtue of men's rights would be a good riposte, but taking a step up to equal rights seems more benevolent and proper. Men Vs. Women turns into a shouting match. Women vs Equality is assimilation and difficult to argue against. Edit: thinking about it more, if women were to up the game to equality for all instead of simply feminism (feminism (and MR) is by definition, unequal) - they could preempt and better control the message but I think there's probably motivation i…
/r/MensRights09/01/14 04:21 PM
2

Their testimony page has both female and male victims. I dont think this charity only supports men.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:07 PM
6

It's twitter.. character limits. Grammar isn't as important as substance.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 04:11 PM
15

$24,000?! for four years of false imprisonment? They could imprison the entirity of the US falsely and then pay $6000 a year per person to keep them there. Why isn't he getting millions, especially if there wasn't any air-tight evidence?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 01:13 AM
-2

People can't learn or change in your book? Criminals should be put to death, eh?
/r/MensRights27/12/13 07:24 PM
1

If your idea of forceful confinement is personal choice, then your statement holds true. You don't HAVE to go to school, live with your parents, ect. It's not like coloring inside the lines - I suppose recognizing that is the true determination of whether or not you're able to be 'forcefully confined'
/r/MensRights26/12/13 02:43 PM
1

You can leave highschool at 13 - get your GED and they legally cant let you back into highschool.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 03:08 PM
6

Porn. You find a porn blog you like, then you subscribe. Then, when you see content you especially like, you follow to the source and subscribe to that. Next thing you know, your main tumblr page is never ending list of photos of anime-elfs peeing on each other in outer space.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 05:43 PM
2

Obviously bisexual people need ghost nurses. Robots have appendages which could be considered sexual.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 02:39 PM
4

I was just thinking about a male version of this app. It wouldn't necessarily be explicitly sexual in nature, rather I'd love to know if the woman I'm dating is a cheater, or if they're the type of insecure person to accuse others of things non stop, or gets off on putting others down -- I imagine women fear that we'd objectify and identify the surest method into their pants but really I want to save time by finding out if they're materialistic, insecure, manipulative, liars, abusive, mean or an…
/r/MensRights26/11/13 05:00 PM
18

Women are strong, so long as a man allows for it, eh? I hear the same sentiment in grappling classes: Women are delicate flowers who deserve respect, who aren't expected to compete seriously thus don't need serious training. But I think: Why bother if you're not giving it your all? I'm often shocked w/ how much women receive from marriage - and in the name of equality no less. It's a bit humorous and dark that I can write off feminism as being an extension of greed. The easy route is seldom the …
/r/MensRights04/11/13 01:26 PM
2

Isn't it proper grammar to decide on a noun and stick with it? Like "them" or "their" isn't appropriate, it's always a choice between him or her or "him or her" So: "tell him or her they are not at fault" or "tell her they are not at fault" not "tell them they are not at fault."
/r/MensRights24/10/13 05:02 PM
1

It seems like public shaming could do the trick. Some sort of open court system records. I know I wouldn't want to hire nor contribute to someone who was obviously a mooch and had no personal respect nor drive. I'm not wanting to trash talk or pigeon hole women, but I do believe this area of court is stacked illogically in their favor.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 07:39 PM
1

That whole area seems like an area ripe for correction. It seems almost too obviously 'perverted justice' - why isn't something like that noticed? It makes me think there is an ulterior reason - IE men are also very manipulative in this regard. I'd think the WRM would fight it too - it's unequal. In my fighting class we'd often have to have reminders not to take it easy on the ladies because in doing so we were making them less prepared and weaker - sure, there are certain aspects a women traini…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 07:22 PM
2

I lived with my dad, so.. Granted he still had to pay childsupport, but it's the thought that counts, right?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:31 PM
-2

I don't understand why more dads don't file for custody. If she has any history of lying or being abusive you'd think it' be an easy win.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 02:43 PM
6

My parents divorced in Washington. I lived with my dad in FL and they were still making him pay my child support payments to my mom in MO. I seem to recall one week him finding his paycheck garnished because he had 'stopped making child support payments'. The people in charge of that process were horrendous cunts who seemed only to give a shit when my dad informed them they were being recorded.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 02:34 PM
3

Tax breaks and loopholes account for more social wellfair than programs designed to help the poor.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 02:23 PM
0

Gives me an idea..: 'If you touch me i'll penetrate myself' Make 'em back off for a couple of reasons ahah
/r/MensRights07/09/13 04:32 PM
6

You thought they were joking when every male in your life told you, "never get married."
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:11 PM
2

I wonder the conviction rate men v. Women considering it's legally impossible for females to rape males.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 09:21 PM
7

I laughed: the director said 'you never know when you're going to touch somebody.'
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:52 AM
3

That's probably the correct definition. If you want to be upset, be upset at the laws which says that women can't rape.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 11:44 PM
2

Can we just make it a social rule that everyone pays for themselves on a first date / meeting someone? I was on a date at a restaurant and when the waitress asked "Split or together?" my date looked like a deer in headlights "oh, I don't have any money." It's kind of become a point of contention with some of my friends who strongly believe it's the guy's responsibility to pay. A female friend said that a guy not paying is a deal breaker - after I told her I had warned a potential (see: failed) d…
/r/MensRights02/07/13 06:05 PM
6

Lesson here: Don't admit to your mistakes. This all started when she admitted through text message that she made it up. If she hadn't done that.. edit; what I'm saying is: this isn't justice being served, this was an idiot being an idiot. There needs to be other safeguards than a lack of common sense by the perpetrators
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:17 PM
2

That status update was an assault on my sanity.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:02 PM
8

Which is why we have an all female military.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:19 PM
2

I chose to live with my dad at age 13. 'Til death do us part ought to be at least 12 years
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:53 AM
1

i thought that was only if used in court. Not preventing you from recording someone and posting it online. Also had to do with it being public vs private place. Expectations of privacy. Why not recording, removing the audio and then providing captions to the live video before sharing it
/r/MensRights09/04/13 09:56 PM
7

This angers me. Maybe it's the constant barrage of seeing men taken advantage of in this manner. I get that children need to be supported, but ex-wifes seem like a hateful drain on resources. I had a room mate with several ex's that often took him to court, he stopped going and just accepted default judgement. From my perspective it seemend like any time they needed money they took him to court. Luckily, he made bank, so he was able to live comfortably with more than 1/2 of his check garnished. …
/r/MensRights27/03/13 08:19 PM
2

You split your estate proper, if it's just a divorce. The one who makes more, pays more. But if the contract is broken by a cheater, the cheater pays alimony, or extra alimony. I have friends who in the process of becoming divorced (IE separated by not divorced), refused to sleep w/ anyone as that's what their lawyer ( i guess?) advised.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 03:47 PM
3

Alimony. Being on the losing end of the split: ie, you receive less
/r/MensRights22/01/13 03:28 PM
2

They could have her committed if you can find another (3 total) who says they know her well enough to decide she needs to be committed.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 11:07 PM
1

I think it's because Rhode Island recognizes gay marriage as well as preforms civil unions. The nuclear family is not the only way and with it things that rely on those roles being the only way will change. I bet the kids with two moms or two dads are happier now.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 12:26 PM
0

Something gives me the feeling my IP address was just farmed.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 09:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter