~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Update: I dumped him!Lol | /r/FemaleDatingStrategy | 03/04/21 11:53 PM |
| 36 | Male socialization means earnestly expecting women to act as charities that do everything for them👏👏 exactly. The guy in the coment think like many men used to think, that women are there to "fix" Men. And some women still have this idea of "my love will change him" No, it wont. He won't stop drinking if he doesn't want to. We are not nurses neither psicologist. Nobody will fix you but yourself. | /r/FemaleDatingStrategy | 27/07/20 04:23 PM |
| 5 | It’s so mean when Lesbians dunk on straight women 😭. Like damn we know it sucks sis but our sexuality is not a choice.I have known a few girls that were bi, or realized they were lesbians but were with men before, and they said women understand you at a much deeper level that a man will, but the arguments are more "feelings, feelings" and some founded it exausting. You get the good and the bad from both sexes | /r/FemaleDatingStrategy | 27/07/20 03:59 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Short man syndrome is monster created by men as much as women — if not more.And how you had no clue what impediment means :D Have u learn to read? I know what impediment means. Also fat women have "impediments" Getting dates and I dont see you beating your chest about it. y argument how looks don't matter by referring to Jake Gyllenhaal (once touted as a Holywood sex symbol) U havent realized yet that looks are subjective, haven't you? Cause Gillenhal is not in my list of most atractive. Also Adrian Brody was once name one of the most sexiest men in the world. 🤷♀ have … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/04/20 10:04 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Short man syndrome is monster created by men as much as women — if not more.Women choosing men not mainly by their looks is not one case. And there are examples everywhere. But I can say the same thing about men only wanted to date 20yos and back it up with charts https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2751179/amp/Are-girl-22-Then-don-t-bother-online-dating-Alarming-graph-shows-ages-attractive-opposite-sex.html Do I think this happens all the time? Maybe sometimes. But I dont see lots of couples were guys are 20 or 30 years older than the girls. Or maybe is cause gu… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/04/20 09:41 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Short man syndrome is monster created by men as much as women — if not more.It's normal and very common to exclude men for their bodies, but imagine a guy saying "no girls over 130LBS", when the average American female is 170lbs, I agree there. Its like women are allowed, but men not really. As I said earlier, women had our revolution, men didnt. Ever heard of the "attraction inequality" or the "gini coefficient". Basically a study that shows that men found women attractive across wide spectrum, while women on the other hand rated nearly 80% of all men as unattractive. … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/04/20 01:17 PM |
| 3 | CMV: Short man syndrome is monster created by men as much as women — if not more.This had happenes because women are normally the ones that have more presure of being thin and pretty. So there was this revolution trying to add more natural looking women to te the table. Also because even models in the 90's looked normal, now they look like bones and flesh. Men on the other hand never had had that much presure of being thin. Eating disorders affect mainly women, and just a few men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/04/20 11:52 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Short man syndrome is monster created by men as much as women — if not more.And stopping eating disorders | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/04/20 11:48 AM |
| 2 | CMV: Short man syndrome is monster created by men as much as women — if not more.This makes no sense because even girls dont talk only to guys that they find atractive. Maybe the typical bitch barbie of the class, not all girls. In my group of friends there was a very short guy. He was maybe 5.2 his voice was twangy and not very handsome over all. But he was our friend. And majority of the group were girls. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/04/20 11:40 AM |
| 4 | CMV: Short man syndrome is monster created by men as much as women — if not more.I literally have never seen men treated rudely for being short. Never haven seen girls in my class doing that. People talk more to their friends in class, period. I dont see girls bringing rules and mesuring guys. Trust me, there are girls that care about measurements but not the height | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/04/20 11:29 AM |
| 2 | Most men stop the emotional effort they put in from the beginning once they get the girl. Why are men surprised when sex dies down too ?That depends if for that individual any effort its "too much effort". Cause in that case, he wont get any mountain | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/04/20 01:10 PM |
| 2 | Most men stop the emotional effort they put in from the beginning once they get the girl. Why are men surprised when sex dies down too ?Useless men did | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/04/20 02:12 AM |
| 10 | Most men stop the emotional effort they put in from the beginning once they get the girl. Why are men surprised when sex dies down too ?Its only fake cause they weren't really interested in the woman, just in her genitalia. Men that are looking for a relationships and tbat now what to do, will keep the effort, or they will lose the game | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/04/20 02:06 AM |
| -1 | Most men stop the emotional effort they put in from the beginning once they get the girl. Why are men surprised when sex dies down too ?If that would be true I woudnt have been rejected on tinder. No woman would | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/04/20 02:02 AM |
| 6 | Most men stop the emotional effort they put in from the beginning once they get the girl. Why are men surprised when sex dies down too ?Nothing will be good enough for a partner who can never be satisfied, be it emotional or financial attention. Its easier to say that a mountain can't be climb,so you don't have to go and climb it yourself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 22/04/20 01:59 AM |
| 1 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?Ok. So having a job and enough money to not be jobless is a necessary condition for women to love you I never said that. That's your philoaophy, not mine. How does that change anything. The man still has to spend money into becoming attractive to the woman. Even if that woman doesn't want that men to spend anything on her. He already had to pay to get her attention. ??? Do you realize your statement make no sense upon what I said? A man doesnt have to spend money to become atractive. He has to s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/04/20 05:24 PM |
| 1 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?Provide the percentage and the source. Because there is no reason to believe that 51% of men can elicit that response from women. There is no such a thing as percentage of girls falling for joblessness guys. It will be funny, but idt so. know that they will have to pay for everything they enjoy in life because no one will pay for them. Paying for a woman is just another cost. Nothing special. Men pay for dates. . Men pay for bigger houses and apartments so the enviroment they live in is not only… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/04/20 04:22 PM |
| 1 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?You are thoroughly close to believe that men can be love as individuals. I gave you several examples, and you through them away diminishing them because you dont want to believe otherwhise. In my country we say "there is nobody as blind as the one that doesnt want to see". I'll say you must be really happy in your beliefs if you work so hard to maintain them. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/04/20 08:12 PM |
| 1 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?And we know the majority of the male population is not as attractive to elicit that kind of response from women. I don't deny that those minorities exist. I just think they are small and irrelevant. No. They are definetelt not small amount neither minorities. That is because men don't like to pay for somethin that isn't worth the money. If they get their money's worth they don't mind paying. No,its because there was a prior agreement that both were equal in that relationship. If one work for 2, … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/04/20 08:07 PM |
| 1 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?Let me refrase that, you think that men are only valued for what they do. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/04/20 07:45 PM |
| 1 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?I will first adress this. Humans are just bodies. Personalities and ideas an similar things are just processes that happen inside that body. An idea is not different that digestion or the beating of the heart. Just the body being alive. So in your idea of how you see men and woman, for u Body contains ideas and personalities. Mm I dont think I apreciate that much how my bf digest a burger as his intelligence, but ok.. I want that. I have no problem paying for my partner's lifestyle. She does not… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/04/20 07:27 PM |
| 1 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?Good for you. It doesn't change the fact that a human is just a body. A woman is not just a body. It has a mind, and personality. Its quite sad that I have to explain this to a person, but I guess is RP misoginistic ideas, and you have many of them. Good looking is something a woman is. Money is something a man has. Your ideas are so arcaic and gender stereotypical I dont even know what to say at this point. And that is a significant difference. I would rather be loved in a shallow way for somet… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/04/20 06:56 PM |
| 1 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?You are basically saying that men are valued only for what they do, meaning their job, arent you reinforcing that stupid idea that japaneses have? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/04/20 06:28 PM |
| 1 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?Now to the point. The fact that women can work and earn their own money does not change the fact that women care about the money men make. I have yet to meet a woman that is ok loving and mantaining a homeless dude with no aspirations. Well obviously, nobody wants to maintain a lazy person. No men or woman want that, unless the ones that are "buying" something of the other person in return. But you are making the statement like if women only care for men that earn good money, or nothing else, an… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/04/20 06:23 PM |
| 0 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?What I am saying is that a man can love a woman for what/who she is. (Humans are just bodies and the biological processes inside them after all.) While women love men for what they do with said bodies. The man is still capable of loving that woman even if she is doing nothing with her ability to provide that place for a dick. A smart man would not act on that feeling unless she is willing to do something with that ability. I dont know were you live but I dont know any woman that is with a man an… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/04/20 04:54 PM |
| 1 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?Trust me, that man wont feel like the same person | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/04/20 04:06 PM |
| 1 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?In countries like Japan, workers introduce themselves like "I am Takeshi, from Honda" Basically their jobs **defines them" as much as their jobs. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/04/20 04:04 PM |
| 3 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?A man that "love" A woman just for her looks is shallow. Period. Same goes for women. I dont find money being less shallow than looks. What people want to know is if some men will stay for a woman just for her looks, it doesn't matter if she os racist, cant hold a job, treat him badly. There is an actual example of this on a tinder profile that this guy did pretending being a good looking woman, but her bio deacribed her as "racist, rude, single mother, entitle, etc" She still got tons of pms me… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/04/20 04:03 PM |
| 8 | Men who are bothered by the fact that women can’t truly love them for who they are: isn’t that hypocritical?Women have known and told all their lifes that they need to be pretty and sexy to atrack men. If a girl is flat, short, fat, have glasses, short hair, doesnt like to wear sexy clothes they already KNOW that they won't atract men, they are sad about it, but they know. I have rarely seen a girl with most of the above qualities feel as entitle as a man to get a "10guy" Or any guy at all. They normally have to fight against their own judgy stare to get some self steem. Nobody told them "a guy will c… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/04/20 03:31 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter