TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

otw Archive

View 0 posts and 73 comments by otw on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Oh god that hurts. There's very few people alive who can even re-fabric Stearmans (Stearmen?) that would cost so much and it can take forever.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/21 11:21 PM
3

Men have the option it just ends at conception. No one is forcing you to have unsafe sex or sex at all. Women only get a little extra time because it's a bodily autonomy issue at that point. It's not like women are getting off easy here, abortions are extremely rough on your body and can be mentally damaging for many people and obviously having a kid is life changing. If men had no obligation after conception it would basically put the entirety of safe sex responsibility on women and we'd likely…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 01:11 PM
1

Why would you consider automation not writing code? Well I am talking more about non-coding CICD stuff which I would consider more configuration and you are often just debugging in the UI of the system. But yeah for sure a lot of that is coding. I would argue it's much more difficult to write good tests for code you barely read/comprehend and instead just copy/pasted into your codebase. Well one you should be writing your tests first :P but yes a lot of copying and pasting is just looking up stu…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/20 06:42 PM
1

it would be surprising/slightly depressing to learn any senior devs did that for 5% of their day let alone 30% Be prepared to be depressed then lol But also very little of actual good dev in many environments is even coding, it's often writing tests, reviews, automation, debugging, etc. I would say the average senior dev is spending very very little of their time actually coding even if you grab some very popular libraries there's very few lines of change per dev working on it. There's A LOT of …
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/20 07:20 PM
1

For sure totally
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/20 07:18 PM
1

I think, if admitting you only do 1% actual coding I think that's probably a hyperbole for joking sake but I mean I could probably take most people's code base and analyze their code vs the libraries they pull in or the bootstraps they are basing off of and it would be ~1% of their work. Doesn't mean it's bad probably some of the best made apps are like this. I mean if you want to get even more pedantic, we didn't write to code that is interpreting our code either and that's definitely going to …
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/20 04:21 PM
1

But it is true...I mean it's more nuanced than mindless copy paste but everyone knows what you mean when you say that. I will frequently have to Google really basic stuff and copy straight from the documentation. It's just human nature to not be able to memorize everything especially when you are working in several different environments with several different languages. It's important to make these jokes because a lot of young programmers get discouraged thinking they are failing if everything …
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/20 04:14 PM
3

Yeah I know I am just saying that's kind of implied in the joke she was probably making so it's kind of weird aggressive response to have. It's a common joke and idea even the most prominent programmers make and I think it's important to make because a lot of young programmers probably need to know that everyone has to do research, we don't just memorize everything and it can be discouraging to think that we do.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/20 04:06 PM
1

I'm just saying that "my job is just copy paste and Googling lol" is a really common attitude and joke in programming. Obviously people know it is actually pretty refined skill to know what to Google and what code to use and obviously "copy paste" often means you are making a lot of changing or just following a general algorithm you found or using a library someone suggested. My last paragraph was just people with non-collaborative attitudes are often terribly programmers in practice because the…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/20 04:01 PM
1

I don't know if it changed but for awhile there was some stat going around that Google and some other top tech companies had most of their new senior devs (between some level) from acquisitions. But yeah if that changed or wasn't true my bad.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/20 03:45 PM
20

It's really not that hard to get hired at Google. I know a lot of really stupid people who work there. These companies hire a lot more than they used to and there's a huge tech deficit now that every company needs tech so they're more willing to take what they can get. Google also doesn't really hire senior devs directly, they usually aquire them. Before companies are about to be aquired, they often surge hiring efforts and accept nearly anyone to make their company appear more valuable. You can…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/20 11:02 AM
32

I mean I am senior software architect and that is pretty true and common joke in programming. She was quick to cry misogyny but the other guy also just seems like a douchey peacock developer or something. A huge part of programming is research and reuse (Google and copy paste or pulling in a library) I don't really like when people pretend to just be able to memorize or come up with every solution themselves. And if you are doing that, you are probably missing a lot of optimal techniques or wast…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/20 10:51 AM
-3

I agree but it being in pussypassdenied is a little eh. The point of grabbing him in the crotch was that the president was talking about how he could get away with the same thing to a woman. Pussypassdenied is about women doing stuff they think they can get away with because they are women that men couldn't while this action was specifically a reference to a thing a man got away with. Still wrong I just don't feel like it's the same "justice" and is missing the poi t of ppd.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/19 11:29 AM
1

What part of this makes it seem like they are being sympathetic because she is a women? The article titled is literally just saying what is happening.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/19 02:23 PM
1

Yeah I get what you're saying, I also feel that way sometimes where it's like, you shouldn't have to transition to feel comfortable doing feminine things. But there's also part of me that does think it's kind of dumb how ingrained sex and gender is in our social lives. Like you can get beat up in some areas for wearing pink because it's feminine but less than a century ago pink was a masculine color. It's like having some weird social order built in to blood types or something.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/17 04:09 PM
–

I mean would you prefer it just be "my genitals don't define my gender role?" In my opinion, gender has a long history of relating to social habits while sex has a long history of being purely biological. At this point you're just arguing fairly minor semantics.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/17 07:33 PM
1

I haven't really met anyone who claimed that. You could I guess argue that some DNA sequencing might affect your predisposition to transgenderism mentally, but I don't think many transgender people claim they are the some special chromosome or something.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/17 06:38 PM
–

But gender is typically the social part, sex is the genetic part. If they said my chromosomes don't define my sex, I would say they were being really dumb unless they have a sexual disorder or something (which only 1 - 2% of the population actually has). If they want to say their genitals don't define their gender, then yeah whatever that can be technically correct I don't care. I can think it's stupid in many cases, but I'm fine with it on a technical level.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/17 06:36 PM
–

I really think that's just marketing I highly doubt that much science goes in to shampoo.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/17 04:23 PM
–

I get what you're saying but those people don't argue against the genetics. They argue for the right to behave socially opposite or indifferent to their physical genetics. There's nothing in genetics that says a man can't wear a dress.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/05/17 02:18 PM
–

Not based on dating site data.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/17 05:58 PM
–

It's not you can look at the data. Black women are often less pursued by their own race than any other race.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/17 05:58 PM
–

It's just another point that this sub is more about pointing out the flaws of women then promoting men's rights...
/r/MensRights07/01/17 04:07 PM
–

That's where this whole hashtag comes from. It's about how black men often try hard to not date black women. Statistically speaking, black women do have the hardest time finding partners according to many dating sites and polls. So they are understandably a little upset.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/01/17 08:44 PM
1

The internet was useful advocacy resource a decade ago but not any more. I've noticed that too. I argue against misinterpretations on both feminist and men's rights side online, and honestly I don't know if I'm just arguing with kids but conversations online just seem filled with a lot of pretty crazy people. I've found the actual organizations to be a lot more receptive and balanced.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 02:56 AM
–

Oh okay sorry I thought you were just being an ass. My name is Frank Simon I am located in the East Coast area. I'm not anyone one big but I have talked at a lot of domestic shelters and various political organizations (largely ones with gender politics on a forefront) mainly in NYC.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 09:23 PM
–

ignorant extremists hijack both these movements
/r/MensRights02/01/17 12:58 AM
–

I'm confused you aren't the person I was talking to? What is the relevance of this comment?
/r/MensRights02/01/17 12:58 AM
4

If being a homemaker was so glamorous why did so many of them fight against it? For every pampered wife you have a lot of oppressed women in bad conditions and back then wife beating was completely legal and even encouraged. Even being a pampered lazy homemaker isn't always amazing if it's your only choice. Many were just glorified servants and breeders.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 03:37 AM
–

Well if you really stalked my post you'd realize I'm a pretty big MRA, was raped by a women and am very active in real life men's rights and men's rape awareness, and I simply try to stamp out extremism (misogyny and misandry) in both communities. And I just try to educate. I think men's rights and feminism really want the same goals and I think ignorant extremists hijack both these movements without really trying to be empathetic to each other's side. But it's fine dude we can disagree.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 03:35 AM
1

This is the second time you're deliberately ignoring the fact that women have birth control options other than abortion. If a woman doesn't want kids, she can take her own birth control. I've already mentioned this 2 times, but you're avoiding it for some reason. I'm avoiding it because I'm trying to limit the amount of points we arguing and it really doesn't change anything. It still compromises bodily autonomy. If you can prove you both agreed to not have kids, and she lied about birth control…
/r/MensRights31/12/16 01:12 AM
–

Dude following posts around is weird. That's a separate argument and yes, I already thoroughly explained to you how I believe that's a non-issue that only makes men's rights look bad. I'm happy to talk about it more but leave it in that thread, don't post stalk me.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 12:59 AM
–

Yeah really, during the war women did do most if not all of these jobs just fine, then they were forced to give men back their jobs afterwards. Also you could argue we owe women for giving birth or doing most of all textile and electronic assembly or for doing most house chores blah blah etc. It's a dumb argument. We should appreciate each other because we are both human beings. Not because one gender does something more than the other.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 08:32 PM
1

This doesnt change if men are given an out. It's still the mistake of two people. But it's not a fair out. Men can just walk away, no consequence. Women have to have the baby or suffer through abortion. The ability of men to walk out after conception coerces someone else's bodily autonomy and I don't think that should be fair. I think the responsibility for men simply needs to emphasis preventing conception. It's not totally fair but it's far more fair than having bodily autonomy compromised in …
/r/MensRights29/12/16 05:54 PM
–

"If you don't want to be a single mom, don't have sex." And that's valid advice. An unplanned baby (except in cases of rape obviously) is the mistake and responsibility of two people. They are both immediately responsible for that child at conception. This isn't political for me it's logical/legal. You can't just say "well if the woman doesn't want to have an abortion and the man does, he can just leave." Like very very many women won't have an abortion, we would have tens of thousands of babies…
/r/MensRights28/12/16 05:22 PM
1

That's the same argument pro-life people make: use birth control (which includes abstinence) or face the consequences. Except it's not because in one situation it's asking a party to lose autonomy over their own body. If men and women had sex and laid an egg second afterwords I'd be fine with abortion being illegal because at that point you aren't asking a party to force carry something in their body.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 10:45 PM
1

Eh if the man has control at conception (i.e. it's not rape) then I don't see a problem. Wear a condom or don't have sex. After that it's the woman's body and her choice until birth. We shouldn't be able to coerce people about what they can do with their bodies. That'd be like threatening someone to donate a kidney to give it to a sick person. You can't let father "opt out" of parenthood because that could be used as coercion to abort or the father could opt out after it's too late to abort. Yes…
/r/MensRights22/11/16 05:04 AM
1

How is one at odds with the other? Each person controlling their own body does not conflict with the others rights. Custody is a different issue of course.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 04:33 AM
1

I don't man I think we just have to agree to disagree. I understand some of where you are coming from but you are making huge leaps to completely ignore the massive amounts of oppression women have faced. You can acknowledge and accept women faced oppression and also support men's rights it's not exclusive. You don't have to do ridiculous mental gymnastics to try to support your viewpoint and in my opinion it only makes you extremely less credible. You're acting like men were commonly forced to …
/r/MensRights22/11/16 12:43 AM
1

(First off, thanks for the interesting conversation, not trying to be antagonistic this is generally interesting, sorry if my tone comes off kind of rude just how I work off arguments I'm generally trying to understand your point while arguing my own) I would 100% be a man still are you joking? You could legally beat and rape your wife. Wives were essentially property. Yes, some women got taken care, an option men usually didn't have, but men still had way more options in general. I would rather…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 10:26 PM
1

Just because other people also had it bad doesn't mean there wasn't a hierarchy with women being towards the bottom and getting rights later than most men most of the time. Yes, poor women might have been on par with many poor men at certain times, but there's almost no instances (other than extremely rare and special occasions) of women being on par with men at the top (almost no women leaders, rulers, politicians) and to pretend that this did not negatively effect women as a whole is some seri…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:45 PM
1

The truth is women were never ever oppressed relative to men Lol okay buddy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_rights#History I'm willing to entertain the idea that some men today don't see modern women's rights issues as important but to pretend that women were not super oppressed in history is absolutely redeemable ignorance.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 03:58 PM
0

Or you could come join the adults table. Please where.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 03:56 PM
6

I think I'm laying my points out pretty fairly you're free to address them if you want.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 05:43 AM
1

Oh okay maybe I misread you on that I thought you meant you no longer support any women in the workplace because of one bad experience and that came off as rather extreme to me. Sorry for the misunderstanding I didn't realize you meant you were literally one man removed from a workplace who supported women.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 05:42 AM
4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism#Victims_of_McCarthy
/r/MensRights20/11/16 05:40 AM
1

I've never done horrid to women. I had actively supported several who were victims of harassment where I studied and worked. But then I refused to date one and she waged a feminist holy war against me as the personification of all male evil. Purely and transparently because I refused to date her. So that's one less man supporting women in the workplace. You no longer support any women in the workplace because of one bad experience though?
/r/MensRights20/11/16 05:17 AM
0

If someone said all MRAs were misogynist because of one MRA I would say that is factually immature and wrong of them. Same goes if you generalize feminists. But okay.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 04:54 AM
-1

Does it not make sense that an issue affecting more people gets more attention? If Google did a doodle for cancer awareness day but not MS awareness day, it's not great, but I also understand because cancer generally affects more people. I don't think that means Google is saying fuck you to people with MS.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 04:49 AM
0

I don't really see how that is a personal attack and I don't get why you have to keep reaffirming yourself that you aren't affected. Generalizing is an immature thing to do.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 04:47 AM
2

I don't think men's rights or this sub should be about this. There's too many posts in contrast to women or women's rights or antagonizing women and women's rights. I have been involved in men's rights for a long long time and it's disheartening to see a lot of people joining this movement as a backlash to feminism rather than a legitimate concern for male victims. The men's rights movement spawned from a generally feminist view point. Unfortunately in the last decade or so, it's becoming ridicu…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 04:30 AM
1

I can't speak for everyone, but my issue with your line of thinking is not that women's issues don't matter, it's that women's issues matter so much to everyone that they eclipse men's issues. I 100% agree with that and that's where I come from with men's rights. Unfortunately a lot of people here turn it in to a pissing contest and want all or nothing. So many people here respond to me and PM me asking for one example of how women are oppressed. It shows a general detachment from reality if you…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 04:23 AM
-5

How very feminist of you. More generalizing. How mature of you.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 04:19 AM
0

Also we should only support women's issues and should never talk about men's issues Did not say that I'm a very large advocate of men's rights and have been saying just the opposite. You can talk about both without disparaging the other.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 04:19 AM
0

I don't know I don't work at Google but I don't think it's some crazy injustice. If I had to guess IWD is just on more people's radar as internationally women's issues are more prominent especially when it comes to third world countries.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 04:18 AM
-1

I mean I don't think you should discount a movement because of one person that's incredibly immature. And I don't think stooping to your enemies is great either. I agree a lot of the feminist movement is terrible and does terrible things but that should never be justification.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 03:54 AM
2

To A: I'm not trying to do that I just feel like sometimes people here really try hard to pretend like it's completely ridiculous that women's rights are taking more seriously and have a larger movement. It's ignoring a lot of history and ignoring a lot of modern issues. This isn't placing women's issues above men's, it's just maintaining perspective. Cancer research and MS research are both important. Both diseases can cause horrible suffering and death. I would never say a cancer patient is mo…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 03:53 AM
-1

I mean that varies person to person, but I personally think international issues regarding women not having the right to vote and being treated like property puts a lot of men's rights in to perspective. In developed countries I think reproductive rights are more severe than say family court bias against men. A lot of women also don't feel safe walking streets alone in cities at night and sexual harassment is pretty pervasive. I also think a lot of men's rights issues are often internalized (i.e…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 03:44 AM
1

Yeah then maybe we agree sorry if I didn't realize that I'm also mentally drained getting a ton of messages and private messages right now about this issue.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 02:35 AM
1

Agree to disagree, sorry about your experience I was also abused with female on male rape as a kid so I understand the pain. I just don't think acknowledging the issues women face invalidates the issues men face. I think men's issues need to be approached from the point of view that we are not on the radar, not that they are more important.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 02:11 AM
–

Exactly. It's about saying how we need these issues on the radar not that it's a pissing contest and men are more important.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 02:08 AM
-5

A lot of feminism takes it too far for sure and America is definitely much better than a lot of the world (ranked 20 currently for equality) but there's a very long list of issues that affects women in America. Obviously that's great you don't feel oppressed, many women and men in history have worked very hard to make sure that many women today feel they are equal and I'm not saying you should feel oppressed, but certain things like reproductive rights and sexual harassment are still a very real…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 01:45 AM
-1

And you should be able to. Which is why I push for this. I think the problem with a lot of people perceiving white men are sexist/racist is because these movements are hijacked so often and we need to fight that.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 01:43 AM
2

Rape is almost never how it's portrayed in media. It's rarely someone pinning you down and forcing you have sex. It's usually someone you know taking advantage of you. Subtly forcing you because they are in a position of authority or power. Pressuring you because they are a loved one you don't want to disappoint. Taking advantage of you because you are too naive to understand what they're doing. I was abused when I was very young in to young adulthood. At some point I even thought I was the one …
/r/MensRights20/11/16 01:36 AM
0

No there's obviously issues both men and women need to push in the US.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 01:30 AM
-19

Severity is obviously subjective though and everyone is entitled to their opinion, but as a big proponent of certain men's rights, I still believe women have a much larger uphill battle while men's rights is larger defensive or attacking rather small pockets of extreme injustice. I think my line of thinking is less divisive and would help us progress faster, but just my opinion. Men's rights is relatively new while women's rights has a very very large history and a much more tangible injustices …
/r/MensRights20/11/16 01:26 AM
0

You can both have issues and still acknowledge that the other's might be more severe than your own while still pushing that yours not be forgotten. They are not at odds so one doesn't have to win over the other. I can acknowledge that women being property and not being able to vote in other countries is more severe than biased family courts in developed countries but I still can support change for both. Severity is obviously subjective though and everyone is entitled to their opinion, but as a b…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 01:17 AM
1

Could not agree more. That is exactly what is happening.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 01:14 AM
4

Sorry wasn't meant to be patronizing I just meant to say that you need to understand the biases we have in our culture and try to rise above them. Less than a century ago is not a long time. Many people are still alive today from the red scare and those ideas have persisted in our culture and a lot of our understanding of history was shaped from that time period. Even if it's not as apparently it's still subtlety pervasive in our culture. But somehow atrocities always happen. Can you point to a …
/r/MensRights20/11/16 01:13 AM
-5

I say that because it's core to men's rights. Men's rights is not saying we are the oppressed and we must rise up and win because we are the disenfranchised. Men's rights is saying we cannot forget men in the wake of women's rights. Obviously severity is subjective and if you really think men's issues severe, that's fine. But as a huge proponent for various men's rights, I can still acknowledge that historically women have had a much more uneven power balance generally. They had to fight for the…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 01:03 AM
–

If I mis understood what you said please correct me. I mean I'm just saying a lot of the reason men's rights isn't taking seriously is because people often bring it up in retaliation to women's rights focus. I think we would be taken more seriously if we were allies instead. I also think people in this movement need to understand the history of women's rights and the severity of women's rights to this day. Women are still property in many countries. Women had to fight for the right to vote. Wome…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 12:56 AM
–

Keep in mind we also live in a society where anti-communism propaganda was extremely strong to the point where we were literally on a witch hunt for commies. A lot of these people have been highlighted as evil specifically to discredit communism in the mid 1900s. I'm not saying they aren't guilty of atrocities, but if you took everything bad capitalist leaders did you could similarly highlight capitalism as evil. Furthermore, the atrocities these people committed had nothing to do with communist…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 12:13 AM
–

Okay I'm sorry but can we stop with this shit? I am a victim of female on male abuse and support a lot of men's rights issues but I feel like a lot of people in this movement and on this subreddit just hijack men's rights in order to shit on women's rights or make some dumbass comparison. Men's rights and women's rights are not at odds it's not a pissing competition over who gets the most recognition. Women's rights ARE a huge deal and have historically been a larger deal and are still a MUCH la…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 12:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter