TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

oursland Archive

View 0 posts and 159 comments by oursland on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

As a liberal, yes I have noticed that. But... not black men. ... or Arab. Just white. Not exactly correct: it's more about placement within the arbitrary Progressive Stack. You can see this in practice with the Arabs who were celebrated when they became the majority of that Michigan town government, but then reviled when they opposed another group higher on the Progressive Stack.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 06:16 AM
4

That sign sends a very interesting message: "1950's WOMEN ARE REVOLTING"
/r/MensRights15/09/20 04:59 PM
24

You done fucked up. They're just as bad. Harry's declares "It's time for a new definition of masculinity." They've since deleted the tweet after Gillette in order to hopefully attract customers like you.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 06:12 PM
1

1920s is correct. That was a time during the Weimar Republic long before the rise of the NAZI party. However, there was a underlying tone and sentiment against Jews that the party capitalized on. It's hard to dispute that men are being cast as the boogeymen that if they were simply removed that the world would be a better place. Men are at the top of the banks, media, business, and government and are therefore the source of problems and should be eliminated. Sound familiar now?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 06:46 PM
1

In the US, many of the female elite are graduates of the Seven Sisters colleges back in their women-only days. For example, take a look at notable alumnae from Wellesley. Among the names are people like Madeline Albright and Hillary Clinton. And Vassar helped produce a plethora of female mathematicians, scientists, and engineers such as Rear Admiral Grace Hopper. I do believe there's considerable truth to the claims that gender segregated educational spaces tend to provide better outcomes for bo…
/r/MensRights13/03/19 04:22 PM
1

Title IX claims have affected black men at higher rates than white men. It can be both sexism and racism.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 05:29 PM
3

Schick and Dorco have not run anti-men advertisements.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 06:47 PM
25

Harry's bashes "Toxic Masculinity" on International Men's Day Then tried to hide it when Gillette demonstrated that attacking your customers is a bad idea
/r/MensRights04/03/19 04:20 PM
2

It’ll take more than a pro-military add to get business back from my congregation. This is an anti-military ad.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:58 PM
7

No. This is more signalling. This time it's the advertising opposite of "support our troops".
/r/MensRights03/03/19 11:09 PM
4

This is an anti-military advertisement.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 11:09 PM
0

Dollar Shave Club and Harry's have both thrown men under the bus for "toxic masculinity" in their social movement campaign videos on Twitter. Schick and Dorco have not, and are better options.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 12:31 PM
2

Just like someone backtracking on "men are trash" is "clarification"?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 04:31 PM
2

Terry Crews isn't running for president. Unless you consider his appearance as President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 04:28 PM
5

'When you're white ... you don't know what it's like to be poor' -- Bernie Sanders, 2016 The full quote: "When you’re white, you don’t know what it’s like to be living in a ghetto. You don’t know what it’s like to be poor. You don’t know what it’s like to be hassled when you walk down the street or you get dragged out of a car," Sanders said.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 06:46 AM
1

"homosexuality was very prevalent" Explain what this sentence, taken in context, is intending to further? Nestled in between vices and torture, it seems to hold a negative connotation.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 03:23 AM
3

I can't help but notice all the homophobic comments in that video you linked to. It sure seems that video is attempting to link the concept of brotherhood to homosexuality and dismiss it altogether.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 10:37 PM
8

That guy also put acid on the clit. I wish people would publicize this more. This is America, boys get circumcised and girls get the carbolic acid. You know, for Jesus.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 05:14 AM
7

Taking offense to this commercial is a bit silly. VW Commercial: Jeff should do better. Gillette Commercial: Men should do better. Sure, you may not see VW make a commercial in which Becky needs to do better, but this advertisement isn't painting all men with a broad brush.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 04:11 PM
5

This is /r/MensRights , not a venue to discuss personal matters of someone else's family, nor a place for paparazzi photos.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 03:06 AM
3

It is not up to the men to build up the trust again. If, and only if, the women stop their witchhunt, get on the side of the wrongly accused men and help punish false accusers then I see a chance of the lost trust to be built up again. Impossible. What trust allows is for someone to be vulnerable; to speak freely and act honest with one's true self. This openness comprises the basis for the strong relationships required for friendship, mentorship, and networking. The problem that's been demonstr…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 04:59 AM
6

Only the negative ones.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:37 PM
1

And made the announcement the day before the California primary, causing people to stay home.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 11:53 AM
3

Intellectual inquiry is now subject to ideological purity. Lysenkoism has come to America.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:12 PM
6

The courts shouldn't be playing these games at all. Instead, they should rule that these extrajudicial proceedings altogether deny people their rights to due process in a court of law, not some kangaroo court staffed by ideologues.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:11 PM
9

CNN considers age, race, and gender as important qualifiers for public office; notably old, white, and male are all apparently bad things. They even put those as negative attributes over his party affiliation which precludes his ability to run for office as a Democrat. You can complain about /u/PanderjitSingh_k's comment, but he isn't simply pushing an opinion unprovoked. The media has taken aim at a large population, expect some people, particularly in /r/MensRights, to take offense and push ba…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 02:35 AM
0

And the men and women who aren't having children? How does this fairly compensate them for their actual work instead of time off?
/r/MensRights24/07/18 01:49 AM
2

It's the makeup style of Pris from Blade Runner.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 02:58 AM
2

You should read Title IX. It will take you 30 seconds and does not specify gender preference. Then there are about a dozen exemptions for things like all boys/all girls schools, religious studies, etc. All of this crap you know about Title IX is due to legal interpretations from the Judicial branch or guidelines from the Executive branch. edit: As you all seem to downvote me instead of replying with any counter argument, here's Title IX in it's entirety. Only portion (a) is relevant to this disc…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 03:00 AM
13

It is a gendered issue. The poster noted that when they identified as female, there were legions of women willing to act in her defense. When they identified as male, women were among the offenders. Someone surprisingly found out about Women are Wonderful Effect the hard way, and discovered they no longer have a privilege they once had.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:20 PM
2

If you know that they’re using you, you’re not a useful idiot. They're not using the likes of Sarkeesian and Quinn, no one is manipulating them. The UN and member states are providing them a venue and promoting their message. As far as Sarkeesian and Quinn are concerned, they're using the UN and member states to further their goals. It happens to also further the goals of totalitarian regimes, which is convenient.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 01:24 PM
41

The term "useful idiots" doesn't actually suggest these people are naive; they have their goals and know the consequences. However, they're useful because if the likes of China, Iran, Saudi Arabia or any other totalitarian regime were to simply state they want to control the Internet to "sanitize" it, then others in the UN would object. Now they have a pretty face and politically correct cause they can hide behind, the UN will accept these thought censorship campaigns with open arms.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 11:06 PM
66

Useful idiots to construct casus belli on Free Speech and the Internet.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 08:30 PM
4

There's irony here that many don't see. The concept of a "safe space" was actually intended to provide a venue to air politically incorrect conversations without suffering the consequences that usually follow. For example, if a female victim of rape was saying she's afraid of all men, or a white person was held at gunpoint by a black person and subsequently felt fear around black people, a support group would be a "safe space" for them to air these feelings without being judged for it. It's poli…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 12:10 AM
1

And how would she pay alimony? It would be her problem to come up with alimony. Would it be in the providing of services like cooking/ cleaning/ etc? What about sex? All of those things have fair market value. If all those things are part of the deal, does the government now include intercourse in the equation? Why not, there are legal brothels in parts of the USA and elsewhere. The market value can be established, no different than considering a man's income for alimony payments. Why should men…
/r/MensRights24/04/18 01:39 PM
1

Also good questions. As a contributing member within the marriage, the SAHM would be required to contribute after the marriage. She may be required to pay alimony to maintain quality of life for the ex-husband.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 01:13 PM
23

There's no need to discuss ancient misguided concepts like Alchemy, when there are recent examples and terrible consequences of this kind of thinking. This is standard post-modernist thought. Under modern thought and Enlightenment Rationality, one uses data to come to a conclusion. Post-modern thought rejects this, makes claims that reason itself is flawed, and proposes a conclusion regardless of the data. This anti-scientific approach pervades all domains, not limited to philosophy, social scie…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 04:29 PM
1

You and I hold the same position on the topic, however that doesn't change that some wish to construct financial value to it to further the wage gap myth. However, I believe should these people succeed, then the SAHM would be considered to be contributing financially to the household and entitled to less alimony due to their percentage of household contributions. After all, after a divorce the man's quality of life is diminished from no longer having these contributions.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 06:30 PM
17

It occurs to me an interesting thought. There's a big push to try to assign monetary value to household work like caring for children, washing dishes and cleaning clothes. Could this not be considered financial contribution and actually lessen alimony payments?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:29 PM
4

This is a tongue in cheek way to ask for citations and sources.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 11:04 PM
4

We Have Lower Testosterone Today Than Our Grandfathers Generational decline in testosterone levels observed You'll find their data sources cited in these articles to back up the claims.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:23 AM
2

It's more likely tied to the decline of testosterone, which is necessary to build muscle in both men and women.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:14 AM
3

LGBTQ was once GLBTQ. Actually this strikes a nerve with me. It used to be Gay and Lesbian, and GLB. The reason for this was to represent those with non-hetero relationships and sexual orientation. The T and Q components somehow got added in, but they're about identity and not orientation. IMO, it really dilutes the movement to the point of ridiculousness. For example what does "queering fat embodiment" have to do with persons who have been struggling with their attraction to persons of the same…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 02:29 PM
2

There's more videos, she admits to cheating on him.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 06:20 AM
16

It's a clear violation of Freedom of Association, a First Amendment right.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 10:17 PM
22

They don't seem to be TERFs, but rather more social conservatives who disagree with men-who-identify-as-women invading their women's spaces.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 12:10 PM
3

In that case she'll never be permitted in schools, voting booths, hospitals, or any other gun free zones.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 12:16 AM
3

/r/atheism on the other hand...
/r/MensRights12/03/18 11:53 PM
6

The Atheism+ crowd killed it when they're more interested in countering "Islamophobia" instead of holding the position that all religion is false.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 10:48 PM
5

It's the new Conformist, Capitalist Punk!
/r/MensRights07/03/18 05:52 PM
3

The movement, in my opinion, is to jumpstart reporting of "sexual assault" which conflates harrassment, touching, abusive sexual contact, and rape. "Sexual misconduct" is the phrase you're looking for. It has no definition and can mean whatever you want it to mean.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 01:48 AM
24

The content of at least one of the talks is basically "boys are falling behind in every stage, and it's ultimately because there's a problem with boys". Not addressed were the proven negative biases in all levels of education nor scholarships and grants denied to young men at college.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:24 AM
91

Some of those TEDx talks are more along the lines of "there's a problem that affects boys: toxic masculinity". They're not helping, they're actively harmful. edit: I missed the obvious "Did you mean" component and was commenting on the list of videos that showed up.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 07:27 PM
14

My father recently went through treatment (radiation, surgery, and chemo) from HPV caused throat cancer. It's completely devastating. There is no test or cure for throat infections. The only thing that matters is a preventive measure such as a vaccine.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 10:44 PM
6

None of that was true in 2009. Your whole argument hinges upon something that isn't true.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 07:23 AM
10

What you are failing to understand is that this feature didn't exist when this analysis was performed. Therefore, the understanding that women view 80% of men as less than "medium" is accurate. OKCupid was founded by statisticians. Their analysis is quite good.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 07:02 AM
13

You're incorrect. The dataset was collected in 2009 well before this automessage feature was implemented.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 05:46 AM
3

I'm sure those fraternities have alumni they can call upon.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 05:21 AM
4

Alt-right are fascists and supremacists... This wasn't the definition until Clinton's "basket of deplorables" comment. After this branding the media has amplified this. Previously the definition was more akin to "not left/liberal, but not religious/traditional conservative". This definition still gets used to describe people, such as Milo, Jordan Peterson, Brett Weinstein, Joe Rogan, and so forth. Then the meaning is silently switched to mean fascist/racist. Consequently, the term "alt-right" is…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 04:46 PM
9

ctrl-left. They're not "alternative" they're mainstream totalitarians.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 03:41 AM
1

I expect cops to be cops And we're back to this. You believe that the police should be obligated to do something, however that's not actually their job. You're upset, but that doesn't change reality.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 07:41 AM
1

HOWEVER, sociatelly we can and do demand more of them. I don't believe this is appropriate. Especially in an era where police departments are militarized and could best the actual militaries of many under-armed nations This should not be acceptable. The idea of the lack of individual duty is meant to excuse not showing up in time to prevent imminent danger reported to 911, not to excuse abject cowardice by officers on the scene unwilling to do what is very clearly a part of their job. Since you …
/r/MensRights27/02/18 04:02 AM
2

This is an accurate assessment. The previous calls to the police and FBI should have led to corrective action prior to the escalation. I know it's often derided, but here's a prime example where the "broken windows" policing could have actually saved lives.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 10:30 PM
0

Don't American cops literally have "Protect and Serve" on their badges? That was a phrase derived from a PR campaign. It's not a description of their job roles. Does the legal right to self-defence make you bullet proof? Nope, however if you cede your right to self-defense, then you're defenseless. It's not anyone else's responsibility to defend you from harm. It's the police's job to investigate and apprehend criminals after the crime.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 10:27 PM
1

Yes, that's correct. The exception is the military. Unless you'd like the military to start enforcing laws, then expect the police to do their job as the police.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 10:25 PM
1

rather than do the job they signed up for The problem here is you're under the mistaken impression that it's the police's responsibility to protect you. That's not their job. The police are there to investigate and apprehend persons guilty of a crime after the fact, which they did. This misunderstanding of what it is the police do leads to some terrible consequences, such as civilians ceding their right to self-defense leading to total defenselessness as it's not the police's job to defend them.…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 07:40 PM
0

It's not actually their job. This has been settled time and time again in court cases up to and including the US Supreme Court. The police system is about responding to a crime after the fact.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 07:36 PM
1

That seems maybe kind of stereotypical or sexist to assume. It's not necessarily stereotypical or sexist. They wanted to capture the demographic that watches the latest Kim Kardashian-type drama. They're an audience receptive to advertising.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:27 AM
3

What do you mean, title IX? I thought that was about prohibiting sex discrimination in schools? You got that right. If you go and read the legislation it's one line, with about a dozen exemptions for things like single-sex schools, religious schools, etc. However, the USA created administrative bodies in the Executive branch capable of writing and altering their own legislation who have no accountability to the public. These bodies have altered Title IX to bring about policy that is not about ge…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:21 AM
2

Neither. The female announcers were likely selected because of their knowledge and enthusiasm for sports. Unfortunately, this coincided with an effort to grow the market to people who normally don't watch sports which means unnecessary backstories and personal life drama. Of course, this failed to bring in the non-sports types and turned off people who watched ESPN for the sports. They could have effectively grown the market by putting on women's sports coverage during the daytime hosted by fema…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:11 AM
8

ESPN attempted to "grow the audience" by moving from sports coverage to coverage of player's personal lives. It isn't strictly that men won't watch women talk sports, it's that men won't watch women talk about sports player drama while ignoring sports.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 04:38 AM
29

Ever seen any "men's only" spaces like there used to be?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:28 PM
1

I think there's a pretty big difference between kids learning to code and determining if that's the right path for them and a mayor learning to code to make it "cool".
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:29 AM
1

The actual nerdy types are getting pushed out because there's too much money at stake. It's political power that's at stake. That's what's upsetting Marlene Jaeckel because she wants to help kids, both boys and girls, further their interests and achieve their dreams in tech. It's people who want to use this as a way to gain political capital that stands in the way.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:11 AM
3

The locations where women are more prevalent in engineering are also patriarchical cultures, in the very literal sense. I recall an article about a decade ago about how to deal with a candidate's father if he shows up at his daughter's job interview. This behavior was common enough with Indian candidates in engineering that an article was distributed within the community. These women were likely guided into engineering by their fathers, not necessarily their first choice in field of study.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 12:32 AM
7

Marlene Jaeckel does a great job of stating from the inside that not only are these "girls only" events, they're actually harmful to the young women because they throw them tech softballs instead of engaging them. Then the turn it into huge political indoctrination for these young women. Is it possible to simply let nerdy types be nerdy types without also demanding them to be identity social warriors?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 12:19 AM
8

She said "collateral details," such as the timeline difference of a year from what she first recalled, "are not important." Facts are not important; only feels.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 04:48 PM
0

Uhh no I didn’t. This is what you said: The govt had a policy to not raid marijuana dispensaries (often?) in states where it was legal. The law wasn’t changed through legislative process. This was never the policy. Obama claimed it, but never followed through. Carmen Ortiz still cracked down on dispensaries. If you’re confused because the person above me deleted his comment Clearly, I'm not confused as I can quote you.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 01:53 AM
0

No, you make it sounds like Obama followed through on his words and then changed his mind. He never did. It was all a PR stunt. The only law that mattered was the one that was written and enforced by the federal prosecutors.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:40 AM
0

President Obama said that, but Federal Prosecutor Carmen Ortiz cracked down on things in California. It's was as two faced as ever.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:17 AM
1

talk to the person who is a problem. Maybe they just haven’t realized? This is known as creating a hostile work environment. if that fails, talk to your boss and/or the boss of the person who is a problem. This may work. if that fails, escalate to HR. HR is there to protect the company, not the employees. If you're a "trouble maker", expect to be let go and your later legal actions considered retaliation for being dismissed. if that fails, consult an employment lawyer and leave your job. This is…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 09:39 PM
18

You're mistaken. Many intelligent people have been caught up in this kind of thinking. Usually this is due to repeated inaccurate statistics which seem to provide a rational basis for terrible ideas.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:14 PM
12

It's not apathy you're sensing, it's antipathy. They're actively against men's spaces, not merely indifferent to them.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:16 PM
1

Everyone is equal when you take everything away from them.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 07:57 PM
1

Can you be specific to this claim of "take accountability" as a fault in JP's argument? Every time I've seen it, he's referring to managing one's own weaknesses and strengths, not dealing with external entities.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:47 PM
5

"I wonder what he did to deserve that."
/r/MensRights05/02/18 11:03 PM
2

These people don't think about individuals, only about arbitrarily defined groups. A sacrifice of an individual means nothing to them as long as it benefits their preferred group. This thinking is doubly-harmful. You don't hire groups, you hire individuals. To ask the individuals you've hired to sacrifice of themselves hurts the employer as well as the individual.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 03:02 PM
9

Largely the thoughts go this way: Claim the system is biased against them. (i.e. "The Patriarchy", "Capitalism", "Racism", "Sexism") Claim that working within the system doesn't change things because the system itself is flawed ("It's a racist system!") Aim to "tear it all down" No thought is considered to: What benefits does the current system provide? ("What did the Romans ever do for us?") Can you place actual definitions to the oppression of the unseen force? (identifying the problems) What …
/r/MensRights04/02/18 05:45 PM
21

Great, they taught a robot to be pissy. The new sexbot future is getting more accurate every day.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 01:03 AM
3

Communications firms (including social media firms) are advertising firms. They are trying to get as many "impressions" as possible, so they end up amplifying awful opinions because they create traffic.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 02:28 PM
3

Eliminating cheerleaders has been discussed lately in the media.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 02:23 PM
2

This is exactly what should be done. File a complaint, file a suit. Change their behavior.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 02:20 PM
1

I don't think I've seen him asking for sacrifices, but for men to do the right thing for themselves. This is in contrast to doing the wrong thing, which leaves someone feeling aimless and worthless.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 03:36 AM
5

Because the sexes are in fact quite different, female totalitarianism would (and does) look different than the male variety. It is rooted more in feelings; we're currently seeing the idea that if a woman (even an unreasonable woman) feels that she has been in some way harmed by a man, that man should be punished. Objective reality be damned. In Stalin's Russia, the very pro-party outspoken words and actions would 5 years later be your death warrant. Totalitarianism rarely comes with subjectivene…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 02:47 AM
1

These people have been raised by TV and movies, and expect future generations to do so as well. Their role models and ideas of reality come not from their parents or community leaders, but from characters on a TV screen. They'll never differentiate between real life and the fictitious world that creative media provide, and consequently their moral policing actions must reach through that barrier to control even the past.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:52 PM
1

Not at all. It simply reveals that when democracy is reduced to a popularity contest that changes opinions faster than clothing models change clothes, you end up bringing about weak but popular leaders. This revelation can bring about change toward strength.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 01:23 AM
2

"I think the key here is it's sort of a decorative role that's making money for men." And there you have it. Somehow the menz are making money and that just cannot be!
/r/MensRights01/02/18 01:18 AM
3

Not a comfort to the men who do get that, including my father.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 04:02 AM
5

If it were throat cancer affecting women, it would not be okay. However, for guys...
/r/MensRights29/01/18 11:22 PM
15

Egalitarian is the word you're looking for.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 12:06 AM
11

Humanism already exists. It's an Atheist movement.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 12:02 AM
1

I disagree whole heartedly. As they have all the rights, and significantly more privileges, there isn't a stopping point where they say they're satisfied. No, it's a supremacy movement. Maternal health is not a focus of feminism either. Feminists are far more concerned with ease of access to abortion than maternal health.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 05:51 PM
15

Disgusting. And you know he knows he has to laugh about it or he'd be laughed at. In some people, laughing is a response to severe stress one cannot control. You'll find people dealing with PTSD who laugh when thinking about the incident, not because it's funny but because that's the way they respond to uncontrollable traumatic incidents.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 07:37 PM
2

You're thinking along the lines of an end product. However, it's quite likely that the technology won't be ready for another 5-10 years and there are still quite a few public policy and political hurdles. The reality of modern automation is closer to Jack in the Box installing ordering kiosks or Royal Bank of Scotland laying off financial planners in favor of "robo-advisors" (web and phone apps). It's not advanced in the since that robotics is advanced, but it is automation and has a very high R…
/r/MensRights26/01/18 01:18 PM
7

You're still stuck in the though process that "automation" = "machinery", which is completely incorrect. Retooling a factory is a very expensive process. Factory workers losses were a part of the previous generation of automation. The RoI gains in that field have largely been realized. The same high cost is true with self-driving automobiles. It won't happen overnight and it will be a very costly process. Replacing office workers with smartphone apps is very cheap. Retooling smartphone apps is a…
/r/MensRights25/01/18 08:37 PM
9

Women are more likely to enter into administrative roles such as human resources, office manager, medical and professional assistant, and middle management. Basically office jobs that can be reduced with a server and smartphone app.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 05:19 PM
3

Wages can go up, or working weeks can go down. Competence goes down with less experience. I'm sure you'd feel a lot less comfortable in the hands of a surgeon who only works 10 hours a week and has done this kind of operation "once or twice" before.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 04:21 PM
10

I don't know where they get the numbers, but I can detail a little of the why behind this. "Automation" is often thought of as industrial robots, like the ones that radically changed farming or manufacturing. This is not strictly the case. The PC revolution with word processors, calendars, email, and spreadsheets made secretaries, typing pools, and mail rooms less necessary. Now there are more advanced software systems that can automate tasks in management, HR, and all sorts of office jobs. Inst…
/r/MensRights25/01/18 04:19 PM
2

But in the 90s-00s, the likes of Valenti would have described meaningless hookups as "empowering." The "empowerment" would have been able to have sex and then decide after the fact whether or not a relationship would continue, the presupposition being that it was her choice to make. The problem here is that men get to make that choice as well, often choosing to end things after the night. No longer is the woman "empowered" with the guarantee that she gets to make that choice as she's again at th…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:12 PM
6

It's the other end of "Women as Sex Objects" -- "Men as Success Objects". She "worked hard" and brought her goods and expected he'd be her success object.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 05:58 AM
3

What rights to men have that women do not? If the premise is that feminism is about equality, then there must be a list of rights of men that women are denied. If there is not, then either the movement is unnecessary or the premise is false.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 11:05 PM
6

As a woman I want to ask them what exactly do you want? They want to live the Disney Princess dreams they've grown up on. Anything less is torture and slavery.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 04:53 AM
1

The future is the "gig economy" in which people are contractors and not granted employees rights. Get used to being and independent contractor, as I have.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 07:47 PM
13

alt-right You mean religious right. There are huge differences between these groups.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 02:20 AM
3

"Bromance" is a term to intentionally mis-characterize male friendships in order to introduce shame or resentment. The term is meant to reinforce the idea that men cannot form close relationships without some sexual characteristic.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 02:41 AM
2

This was really strange. The presenter seemed to think that it "female solidarity" was important as a workplace concept and to be promoted. That's bizarre because it places value exclusively on sex of their coworkers and not on attributes important to business. I've never heard about the opposite being true of men expected to have "male solidarity" in the workplace. In fact, favoritism of individuals over merits is a good way to harm advancement and success.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 11:51 PM
2

The term he questioned was 'is' (search for "'is' is" in that subsection).
/r/MensRights11/01/18 11:43 PM
1

I am contending that we would not predict that and even if we did - it is unverifiable. These are separate sets. If it is unverifiable, then you cannot claim it is true or it is false because you cannot test it. If it is verifiable, then you can determine if it is true or false. Are you recognizing the difference? I'm pretty sure you aren't.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:48 AM
1

Lack of falsification (unverifiable) means you cannot conclusively determine if things are true or false. Either it's in the set of { unfalsifiable } or { true, false}. Not both. This is basic Philosophy of Science material.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:28 AM
85

Sadly, his eyesight is gone. Absolutely tragic for anyone, but especially someone whose life's work was in the visual medium.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 12:32 AM
2

Brendan Eich left Mozilla and founded another browser company, Brave, to provide a secure browsing experience.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 12:15 AM
2

This is completely false and unverifiable Things cannot be both false and unverifiable. You're pushing your own viewpoint here.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 12:10 AM
400

In the last year. Stan Lee is 95 and suffers health concerns that are diminishing his mental capacity requiring on-site nurses 24 hours. Old man dementia is the rumor. So his strange (dementia-related) behavior is practically the same as being raped in an alley at gunpoint.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 12:09 AM
14

Emmanuel Goldstein must be hated!
/r/MensRights10/01/18 07:30 PM
5

The funny thing is that everyone calls tinfoil people insane, yet all the time more and more things are done to undermine marriage, nuclear family and having children. No tinfoil hat needed. People are selfish and marriages take sacrifice to form a lasting partnership. When participants are put in a position where a partnership risky to get into, and penalizing to get out of, there are fewer of such partnerships. Society which doesn't reproduce is a dead one. People will still reproduce. However…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 04:18 AM
13

Number of marriages will drop.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 12:03 AM
3

I'm not sure Paul's take is plausible. Women have waaaaaayy too much social and political power to allow widespread discrimination against them in hiring practices. Even the appearance of discrimination against women (in any capacity whatsoever) will engender a crackdown by the feminist state. There's an increasing trend towards contract-based employment. This lifts many restrictions on employers, mitigates many downsides of employing others, and permits employment often based on the needs of th…
/r/MensRights04/01/18 11:26 PM
5

The freedoms were from Elizabeth Cady Station and other women like Susan B Anthony and Helen Keller There have been profoundly successful women throughout history before them. It's political propaganda in support of a specific feminist movement to say that women were completely removed from providing contributions to society and making a difference before these women. If you look at any American history book (or World History, for that matter) you'll find it littered with contributions of both m…
/r/MensRights27/12/17 01:41 AM
4

“Well Behaved Women Rarely Make History” This statement always irritates me. It's a statement without supporting evidence and acts as awful advice like "follow your heart" or "do what feels good". Successful women throughout history have often been well behaved. Poorly behaved women are rarely successful and are quickly forgotten.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 01:37 AM
1

Jim Corbett wants to help political democrats and progressives cope with the current times by coloring. Alienate majority of voters, that'll help!
/r/MensRights23/12/17 01:44 AM
7

While you wish to defend Al Franken and his actions, we should focus on the incident through the author's lens. She would clearly see this as an affront to feminism, yet here she is writing for everyone to be wary of people holding the feminist supporters to the same standards they want to hold their #metoo targets to. If Al Franken wants everyone to "believe women", as he stated verbatim, then we need to believe Tweeden's account, with photograph as evidence.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:52 AM
4

I was disconcerted that, when Leeanne Tweeden put out a story about her encounters with Al Franken, the alt-right site Infowars and right-wing Trump ally and Infowars associate Roger Stone apparently had advance knowledge of her story. Quite upset when it doesn't work for them. Tweeden even had photos of evidence! This isn't a "believe women" incident, this is one backed up by fact.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:12 AM
0

What they want: Angela Merkel What they'll get: Sarah Palin
/r/MensRights04/12/17 05:53 PM
6

In this case "toxic masculinity" is being used as "male sexuality". The strip club owner, a woman herself, feels that men are being attacked for being, well, men. I think the opposition made an interesting comment that proves this point: Anyone on the feminine spectrum, especially sex workers, already have to deal with the covert problems of toxic masculinity and rape culture, It seems that sex workers taking men's money is just fine, but men finding women attractive and willing to spend money o…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 11:48 PM
11

This is what I've been told by HR. The concept is that if you invite coworkers out, the topics of work or career advancement may come up and you've denied others the opportunity on the basis of sex.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 05:42 AM
9

That's changed in the last generation. Gay men aren't useful to modern feminists. In fact, when men are going through the sexual doubting phase before coming out, many are being convinced that they're not gay, but rather broken women who need to transition. Gay erasure is the tool to eliminate the men who aren't falling over themselves to appease women.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:38 AM
21

If my training was correct, failing to invite female coworkers is sexual discrimination. If you choose to invite your female coworkers to the pub, that's sexual harassment. Whatever you do, you're victimizing women, apparently.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:32 AM
2

Awesome! I've been pushing it for a while after viewing this talk. She pretty much didn't address how men feel until this very moment, and it seems so very profound that she did. I'm glad others are linking to it as well.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 02:26 AM
1

This video is covered by a bunch of outlets. NYT staff admits to bias while stating they're "objective".
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:56 PM
2

However, MSM doesn't have a monopoly on reporting anymore. The MSM has been fighting to de-legitmize "democratic media" sources that compete with their official story. For example, CNN has been caught editing their footage to present a bias, such as removing statements inciting violence, which democratic media has been able to counter with full videos and alternative reporting. However, YouTube has begun demonetizing and blocking videos they don't like. This was under the guise of removing hate …
/r/MensRights10/10/17 04:00 PM
2

Well, media is a reflection of the society that birthed it. Not necessarily true. There's a recent article about the rules dictated to journalists about what stories can be covered, and how they may be covered to send the message the media wants consumers to receive.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:48 PM
1

Anecdotes are not data. The plural of anectdote is data.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 07:14 PM
1

Check out what happens to people with their e2 (a measurement of estrogen) is out of whack ("estriadol imbalance").
/r/MensRights06/10/17 03:54 PM
4

Testosterone is more closely related to assertiveness. Aggression is an emotional response, which is often related to estrogen. However, everyone should have both as they're responsible for a variety of physical systems (muscle and bone repair, soft tissue repair) and social systems (willingness to take a chance or put forward a suggestion, ability to empathize). IOW: You can't blame the hormones.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 12:37 AM
1

No, again, being hit by the bullet would be when she says she's been having an affair and wants a divorce. Getting married isn't necessarily a harmful thing.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 02:06 AM
2

This is being hit by the bullet. Dodging a bullet means avoiding the crazy before it causes harm.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:11 AM
5

I'm pretty sure this is being hit by the bullet. Dodging a bullet would mean identifying the crazy well before it becomes harmful.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 12:10 AM
131

This is standard operating procedure throughout the Western world as a part of the Duluth Model.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:15 PM
1

This is a line of mistaken thinking. At the top elite talent for any given topic, yes men tend to outperform women. This result doesn't generalize to all men and all women. In other words: it's an interesting statistic, but doesn't strengthen any arguments.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 04:45 PM
6

STREAM - the R is for READING
/r/MGTOW24/04/17 06:07 AM
2

It's ridiculous the front you have to put up to meet their desire for an absolutely invulnerable 'tower of strength', but there it is. It's one of the most common traits in dating modern women I find; they seem to often despise any man who shows his vulnerable side, or be totally turned off him sexually at the very least. Brené Brown saying the same thing from her research.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 09:37 PM
2

You argue that things have evolved. They have not. Those organizations are still leading the way, no matter how much you disagree with them. They are the face of feminism, they are where money gets donated, they are who writes the laws, they are who lobbies for things.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 02:55 AM
5

You seem to think that this about the actions of the few. You really should look up the women's rights movement from the 1960s onward. I mention two major names, but they're but just a few of absolutely massive groups. The name "feminist" comes with a lot of history. To ignore that and say you're intent is the true meaning is completely ignorant to the point of insulting those before you.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:52 PM
6

They have evolved, but they're still the mainstream. Again, you can call yourself a feminist, but when Ms. Magazine gets to be the mouthpiece of modern feminism, collect donations, lobby for unequal legislation, then you're going to be painted with that brush as well. Feminism is not about equality. It never was, and it's name even suggests that there's a preference towards women in the movement.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:35 PM
7

They aren't feminazis. They're the mainstream feminists; they literally created the term. These organizations have been around for 40-50 years. They've published countless magazines, articles, and books. They've had many organized meetings, gatherings, and movements. They've successfully lobbied for and against legislation. By calling yourself a feminist, you're joining their movement, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:26 PM
22

What you and the other "actual feminists" miss is that it's not simply a word that replaces "equality between sexes", but an actual political position with their own lobbyists. An example is the National Organization for Women, who are doing such things as actively lobbying to ensure Florida's unlimited alimony remains the norm. If you are unfamiliar with that issue, Florida's current system can result in alimony to be paid for the rest of one's life. It can even be extended to garnish the new s…
/r/MensRights14/04/17 05:04 PM
2

Wendy Tapia and her acceptance to the FDNY may make you want to reconsider your assumptions about whether or not passing minimum fitness tests mandatory for women.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:38 PM
1

Don't for get about his nine kids!
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:31 AM
1

I think the legal barrier thing is a little murky. If the doc were to perform this, I imagine they wouldn't be prosecuted for it, but they could be brought before the board on charges of ethics violation and have their license revoked.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 03:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter