TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

outrageousVoid07 Archive

View 0 posts and 97 comments by outrageousVoid07 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

take a massive economic loss having kids, especially if she is smart and able to do professional work. Not giving paid maternity or paternity leaves does seem like an economic issue to me The majority of the people in the first world country want to have kids but can not due to economic reasons. That's well documented Countries which have provided economic incentives like France did see a growth in birth rate because of it How is this a gender issue
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 04:45 PM
–

Birth rates are declining First World countries who have dropped below the 2 child rate are unable to revert back the numbers Birth rate decline isn't because mothers are treated like shit. It's a huge economic issue
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 02:49 PM
2

I am 90% energy drawn and the looks part is more style, smile, geatures, look in their eyes than whether they are tall, short, fair, dark, etc. Same! People sometimes get rigid about these things
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 10:15 PM
2

I'm denying that genders have their own trend but a statement like men have more variety than women....yeah I don't agree are women more comfortable being average? yes but the rest of bit? not really
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 07:29 PM
1

nobody is "sharing" anybody. Sure, you can say that an individual woman, on those sites, are dating more people than an individual man, which has a lot of its own nuance and factors to account for, but that isn't necessarily "sharing" A reasonable example is Tinder. Since it's, at best, a 3:1 ratio of men to women, those women are probably not sharing the same men. More accurate is that, most women the men get with are shared with the other 100 men in her messages. agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 06:34 PM
2

many of the things you mentioned aren't gendered. Both men and women commit that
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 06:29 PM
2

that even though the intention of that question was simply to spread the awareness of the fear women experience, it was badly phrased which lead to teenagers finding themselves as some kind of monsters and was unsuccessful to tackle the issue because of the bad phrasing and sentiment around the question. I am just saying that issues caused by the bad phrasing and sentiment around the question should be acknowledged again, correct me if I'm misunderstanding you but aren't you saying it is issue o…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 06:07 PM
1

I'm trying to say that tho. The phrasing of the question itself is not good, which lead to this sentiment. As young person is not as smart as adults, generally, it makes sense that they would misunderstand the point. Approaching them while saying they are stupid kind of dismisses why they would feel like that. are you saying that people had issues with the question while knowing better? anyways, in this case, yeah maybe they are stupid then, because they don't have the life experience that adult…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 05:52 PM
0

I have absolutely no respect for a non violent man who defend violent men Definitely, but again we are not talking about defending violent men here. It's about addressing the overall issue that might have been caused by this question We are talking about young boys or teenagers who don't have much experience in life and don't know better. I don't think we should blame them for that, that's how so many generation are very hostile towards each other. It's similar to how it is not helpful to blame …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 05:15 PM
3

Yes, however, that doesn't mean it doesn't have flaws I think we should also acknowledge that consequences of it of how many young men or teenagers who genuinely don't know better(not their mistake) did feel that they are seen as dangerous monsters That kind of protest isn't good either because the message being sent to are people who are no more different than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 04:39 PM
2

that's why everyone chose Bear I agree with the overall statement, but personally, I do consider the bear one to be an overestimation of it
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 04:28 PM
1

I don't think every woman wants a 6ft+ man or straight-up refuse to date something shorter, but Don't you think for women, in general, height is a factor in attraction? Obviously not as overplayed as this sub likes to play it to be. It seems bad faith to me to say that they don't It's a preference, and that's okay
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 03:50 PM
1

Eh not really It's okay for women to have such standards. It's okay for them to want someone taller than them I'm 5'4, that's 4 inches shorter than the average for men in my country. Many women have rejected me solely for the reason of height, and that's fine. You should date who you want to I don't think it's false to say that women do care about height as a factor in attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 03:32 PM
6

That was fascinating to read. As a man, I would say I learned quite a few things myself Have a great day!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 03:22 PM
1

Same It's also quite baffling how many just jump to conclusions
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 03:13 PM
6

Probably because of the way people end up slut shaming them If you don't want to hate a person with a higher body count because statistically they end up cheating more then that's okay What not okay is to generalise someone because of your personal preference
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 03:05 PM
5

infatuated that I find myself mostly attracted to people who look like or remind me of my partner, lol. That is so real
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:23 PM
2

Of course it's a thing Having that good relationship and connection with your partner just enhances attraction towards them overall Also, very sweet to hear!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:23 PM
–

I'm a pansexual guy I find the majority of the men and women to be attractive, even more after I talk to them
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 05:27 AM
2

No People aren't a homogenous group. Don't think what idiots say online as the overall agreed upon answer
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 05:18 AM
1

Men can't change their personalities. People can
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 05:09 AM
1

Ohh that's lovely I am on the same boat at you. Looks are kinda overrated. Just having the person you vibe with is so much better
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 08:49 PM
1

did you meant to reply someone else 😅 because I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 08:06 PM
3

Yeah. men have a huge social pressure to perform financially. Approach first expectation is becoming hard since many people do not wish to bother or make a women feel unsafe
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 06:31 PM
6

yes I agree btw what are those double standards
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 06:04 PM
4

if asked if it will help an avg male or not you agreed it makes them more attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 06:02 PM
3

There is a foundation of attraction But when that other person does make efforts for you, it does become attractive similar to how if you make efforts, I would make you more attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:51 PM
1

What about people who doesn't care about looks as much?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:50 PM
2

An average male with charisma is more attractive than average male without charisma Don't you think that is true?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:48 PM
14

Unrelated, what does fire nation pill offer?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:46 PM
1

Well. I think it is a good time to end our conversation since we have acknowledged our differences It was fun. Have a good day mate!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:44 PM
1

But we are not really talking about no physical attraction, that would imply people are somewhat repulsed by that person It means you are simply below the desired standard
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:37 PM
16

Men and women can be equally promiscuous. However, men do have shown to have a higher libido, an women also have to bother about their safety. I don't think it's a set rule but there is some truth to it. Saying that, en masse generalisation doesn't help anyone. Men must prove himself as worthy to be allowed into bedroom. This fuels courting dynamics and traditional gender roles - exploiting men in exchange of promise of sex. No, not really. Do you want men or anyone to get sex just because? Ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:36 PM
11

I mean, if they makes you happy then good for you I do get actions, it's mostly fwb, I'm 18 so it's not a huge bother
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:31 PM
1

Change not what? You do agree that it does make them more attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:25 PM
19

We do... A lot of people do... Sex is better with people whose personality is suitable to yours
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:19 PM
8

People, is it bad to enjoy sex???????
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:15 PM
3

Yeah, we do disagree on these things and that's okay But I do like to ask, don't you think that are other aspects in life which would make your partner more attractive to you. Keyword, more
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:13 PM
2

I agree that people should be more honest and I just wish to ask Are women really wanting a guy to jump through hoops for them. No one should do if they don't want to. I only have only seen this advice given to men as a way to attract more people Also, people are not that fixated over one thing. If you want to have sex with a hot person, that's okay, and if you think their attractiveness isn't enough but if they have a little bit of something else to offer, which would put them above the bar whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 05:11 PM
15

I'm sorry, I'm failing to understand this but what are you trying to say? Because such things do exist. Some men use women's insecurities for sex and some women using men's sexual thirst for money. This isn't something necessarily gendered but, again, what are you trying to say?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:59 PM
2

Mostly because their standards are so high that they usually don't get a chance with those who they like physically. This is disgusting for me. I personally don't find it disgusting. Attractiveness can be built on other reasons outside of just looks Some people would want to date down, give the other person a chance, and find them attractive because of that. If someone tells me that they are suffering to find a partner because of their standards on looks, then I would recommend them to give a ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:54 PM
20

Then men realize that there is no attraction they need to pass, seek other women who might be attracted to him... And suddenly it is also wrong! No, that's not wrong at all! You should seek people who find you attractive Because men are supposed to invest time, emotions and money to change her mind. Even then, nobody owes you a relationship or sex. But those things help you to attract relationships and sex which you might want
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:48 PM
9

Nah, they do Personality also plays a role in attraction. You would communicate and understand people better if your personality vibes with theirs Sure, personality doesn't play the highest role, but they do Sex is also more enjoyable with a person whom you can communicate better with
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:45 PM
7

There are things outside of just looks that are attractive to people I find "learn to like" a weird wording for that. There are things more than just looks that people also want. Attractive people get an advantage because looks play a factor, but that doesn't disqualify the other point. I believe that's what people are trying to say
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:41 PM
9

What the fuck did I just read
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:36 PM
1

I agree, but that doesn't mean people have to see each other as sexual objects just because no such strings like that are attached
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:34 PM
9

That's not what I'm saying I'm just saying that people can have sex with who they find attractive without viewing one another as some kind of objects If you are a guy or a girl who is looking to simply hook up, then that's okay as long as they are not seeing the other person as sexual objects
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:29 PM
11

Hot guys are "just fun" but a good guy has to wait for sex. Doesn't that just say that women wants to have sex with people they find attractive? What's wrong with that
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:27 PM
22

But you can have sex with women without viewing them as lewd objects Just because someone wants to have sex doesn't mean they would get attracted to anyone. Even then, people have standards, and that is a good thing No one is entitled to it
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:24 PM
3

Not attracted to is not the same as being repulsed. Many people would be repulsed by he idea of have sex with the same gender even though they are not homophobic Fucking people you're not attracted to is not that rare tho, I don't find that line existing much in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:22 PM
20

I think this perfectly sums it up
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:15 PM
2

Because there are few boundaries or lines people don't watch to cross and that's okay
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:13 PM
0

Because it feels good
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 03:35 PM
5

I agree with everything you said overall, but I also don’t see how it’s virtue signaling… like what virtue is being signaled here? It can be. For people to show that unlike the common group, they stand out or that they value things which are objectively more important in comparison to looks
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 03:34 PM
4

Studies show the actual percentage of demisexuals is around 1%. If that's true, then that's a huge number :0
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 03:31 PM
1

I think you have formed a few caricatures in your head about people online It's similar to how some people would stereotype red pill-ers into some kind of hyper conservatives who see women as sex slaves
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 03:22 PM
–

As a guy who prefers chubby ladies and flat chests Preach!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 03:11 PM
8

Eh, maybe it is an uncommon statement for a reason. I don't spend a lot of time on gendered topic forums, but I have never seen this statement before To give it a benefit of a doubt, I think it's badly worded. Women do show more demisexual tendencies than men, even though they might not be demisexual and are as capable of being, for a lack of a better word, promiscuous as men. Those tendencies could be due to many factors that aren't necessarily about demisexuality such as trust and safety
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 03:11 PM
–

That's pretty sweet! I'm happy for you The faster people realise that everyone has different tastes, the better it would be
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 02:58 PM
–

So are you saying that you have an issue with how people are describing those features? Micheal Phelps doesn't have a hyper muscular physique like current olympian body builders.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 02:38 PM
–

Uhh....sure? I'm failing to see the point of the argument. Some, or many, or how does any number of women finding such physique as "dad bod" have to do anything with your initial point
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 02:33 PM
–

??? Are you sure we are discussing the same point Okay, let's restart. Imagine a very hyper muscular guy, now to men, that is attractive and for women, that is not So would you agree that genders see their own and opposite genders differently?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 02:31 PM
–

Yeah but that's not the point The point is that men do consider those olympian physique attractive and in comparison, a lot of women do not
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 02:27 PM
–

We see our own gender in different ways than how the other gender does For many men, a hyper muscular body is attractive. Straight men would consider that attractive For women, not so much. They generally don't like such physique in men and would prefer more leaner physique It's just how it is. It's not that women can't rate other women. They can obviously can. The difference is how they rate those women isn't the same as how men would generally rate them. There's nothing wrong with that. If any…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 02:20 PM
–

Pills are also on spectrum sir/ma'am
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 02:15 PM
–

Having standards is not a bad thing. People can like what they want to This goes for both men and women
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 02:12 PM
1

Eh, both things are not exclusionary
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 07:08 AM
2

Didn't know I would find another WWE mark in here. Awesome
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 07:03 AM
10

Some people are just content being alone
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 07:00 AM
3

Women, or well, people are not a homogenous group tho
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 06:56 AM
1

Two groups of fifty Two people from group A approach every person from group B Two people from group B approach five people from group A Wouldn't that mean that one group is meeting more random people than the other?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 06:52 AM
16

Exactly Try avoiding talking about someone's look unless you know them very well. It's good to find people attractive, but talking about looks can often times be limiting. The other person is also put in a kind of an awkward position where they can't really talk about it, primarily due it coming of as narcissistic and secondly because, well, how much can you talk about something you were born with Things you can compliment them with to start a conversation can be clothes, jewellery, hair, shoes,…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 06:49 AM
1

:o I do wish to research on it, but before that, could you give me a little direction and elaborate a little more, please?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 06:41 AM
6

Women...well, people have lives outside of dating. Men and women have their own problems, which are very different and disproportional to one another This post is very ignorant and dismissive towards the problems that women face on a daily basis Also, suprise! Here in third-world countries, women do genuinely have it worse
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:39 AM
2

Kinda That mostly comes from the top 10%-20% income households
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:36 AM
1

It genuinely is. I have seen women getting groped and taken advantage in public settings. Add in the fact that the economic disparity heavily affects the progress for women Rape cases are often politicised, many times go unpunished, and the majority of the population are only reactionary towards a rape case, not bothering about the victim outside of punishment for the rapist No wonder the youth is leaving the country. sigh I just hope it gets better
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:09 AM
2

Yeah, I agree. especially in rural India areas Casteism also ends up playing a role in shutting down rape cases
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 11:58 PM
1

Indian guy here. No wtf, rape is still very stigmatised in india and not interpreted properly
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 11:51 PM
2

Indian here, I agree that we no way have less rape But I also agree that there is misinterpretation. The question is whether the number is higher or lower There are parents who would file rape case if their daughter ran away and such cases like this do exist However, due to so much stigma, I personally believe that number is definitely higher
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 11:51 PM
3

Indian guy here Jeez wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 11:48 PM
2

Yes I spent time thinking about that. At first, yes, then I questioned, but still, after thinking harder. My clear answer is still yes The economy will hit everyone, but raising a child is the biggest economic decision of someone's life. The economy has magnitude, and in the context where this has taken place. The state of the economy has still been sustainable for people as compared to them simply losing that bodily right and ending up with unwanted kids Having the option of abortion is basic h…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 06:58 PM
1

You know what? I thought about it Yeah bad economy is worse. It hits everyone compared to a subset of people. Saying that, even if that is "selfish" wouldn't you say it is pretty essential?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 06:46 PM
1

Bad economy has magnitudes. Yes, I believe that having a bad economy is better than 50% of the population losing bodily right
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 06:38 PM
2

No, a bad economy is terrible but not as much in comparison to women having rights to their bodily function That's same as saying that me valuing not getting crippled over both of us both of having fever. I acknowledge that that economy is important, but things like abortion or choosing your basic human right don't make you selfish. It's not group b choosing their benefit over everyone else. It's them protecting their basic human right. Needing essential things in life isn't selfish. You can't b…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 06:31 PM
1

Yes Group B are individualistic people Anyways, go on
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 06:00 PM
1

I am answering how an individual would discover that people aren't as selfish as made to be Yeah, that might not be the evidence you need but you need to have a very pessimistic thought process that people would lie on on such a large basis even though there's no incentive to lie in such scenario
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 05:55 PM
2

By talking to people I am a hyper-extrovert who people deem extremely trustable. When you do hear their side, you will realize that they are not out there to get you or narcissists Is there a huge increase in individualistic ideas? Yeah, but that doesn't mean people are purely selfish being suddenly. Everyone has their own lifes to deal with, and some people are more individualistic than others but definitely not as much as portrayed online
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 05:17 PM
1

That's very sweet and gratifying to hear
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 05:11 PM
1

congrats!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 05:01 PM
1

Why are you saying it as if having a fat fetish is bad lol? Unrelated but I found it funny
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 08:31 PM
1

Yeah, be nice to people, like genuinely I go around the supermarkets, parks, etc, greeting them with mornings. If I have to be around them, I may initiate a lil convo at best Yeah, you don't have to go around saying that to everyone, just someone who is close by, around ya or helping you Saying that, I have always seen a +ve response, but yeah, you need to go without an ill will or ulterior motivation
/r/seduction16/08/24 08:02 PM
1

4 billion women in the world, just say hi and have a chat depending on how they react It is not like you talking because of the intention to date or hook up, just normal chat. Say hi to anyone close to you, around you, any acquaintance and chat. Observe how they are replying to you and their body language. If you they are uncomfortable to talk further, stop there and try another time with someone else
/r/seduction21/07/24 01:54 PM
1

Idk man which feminist you are listing because whenever I genuinely look into it Feminist are more focused on normalising than polarising the genders From your comment, it seems you are thinking these people are feminist. A female comedian talking shit about male isn't a feminist nor are other I have listened to both feminist and menlib activist, it is hard to see hate towards the other party. Majority are Tame and these the people you are mention are the minority
/r/MensRights16/03/24 10:08 PM
0

they're still feminists if they believe in stuff feminists believe. But then why shall we blame "feminist" the banner as whole for these extremist
/r/MensRights16/03/24 09:52 PM
0

That sure is an interesting opinion you have something that somebody else has then you both share a common interest so do all the people that choose to follow feminism will also have the common interest and actions. But having a misandrist opinion won't make anyone a feminist. If x follows feminism and fights for equal rights of women in 3rd world countries, why shall be grouped with these misandrist? The same can be applied to tennis lovers, all tennis lovers play tennis because it's a shared b…
/r/MensRights16/03/24 09:26 PM
0

So why should we not apply the same logic to feminists? Because it is the sole thing we are trying to oppose, if a man commits crime and they say all men are criminal, do we not oppose that? If you are using the same logic then you are being a hypocrite mate, it just makes our opinions seem less serious. They ARE feminists extrimists or not. Yeah? I think I clearly mentioned that. If a male commits crime we don't call all males criminal, these women in the pics will They have feminst beliefs How…
/r/MensRights16/03/24 08:55 PM
0

I will always hold support for menlib but those aren't feminist, those are extremist and as they call themselves out, misandrist Let's not blame a particular group because of these stupid extremists, it is the thing we are opposing
/r/MensRights16/03/24 08:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter